Evaluation of vaccine allergy safety track program to assess potential COVID-19 vaccine allergy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Concerns about new COVID-19 vaccines played a key role in vaccine hesitancy and hampered population uptake. Hong Kong initiated a Vaccine Allergy Safety Track (VAS-Track) program to assess potential COVID-19 vaccine-associated allergies. A 'Hub-and-Spoke' model of predominately non-specialists supported by the allergist hub was established to meet overwhelming demand despite limited specialists. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of VAS-Track as a pre- and post-vaccination assessment service for individuals potentially at high risk of COVID-19 vaccine-related allergy. METHODS: An individual-level decision-analytical model was constructed using data from VAS-Track participants supplemented by published estimates. Analyses were from a health service provider perspective over 12 months. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Willingness-to-pay threshold was based on local GDP per capita (US$ 49,590). Sensitivity analyses examined robustness of findings. RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness varied widely across age groups. VAS-Track was cost-saving for older adults (dominant strategy for age ≥ 50) compared with standard practice across a range of sensitivity analyses. VAS-Track was not cost-effective for younger groups (age 18-49: ICER: US$ 410,914/QALY for pre-vaccination and US$ 213,786/QALY for post-vaccination assessments). Infection rate, cost of treating severe infection, and vaccination rate were most influential on cost-effectiveness estimates. CONCLUSION: VAS-Track was cost-effective both as a pre- and post-vaccination assessment service for adults over 50. The 'Hub-and-Spoke' model using non-specialists with limited allergy specialist resources to provide vaccine allergy assessment services would provide high economic value compared with usual care for adults aged 50 and over.

Extending the role of tryptase in perioperative anaphylaxis: Predicting positive results in basophil activation tests.

Background: Basophil activation tests (BATs) are useful in identifying culprits of perioperative anaphylaxis (PA), but their utility remains limited due to technical limitations, cost, and availability. Being able to prioritize patients with likely higher yields for BAT would be useful in reducing costs and manpower. Objective: We sought to investigate whether tryptase levels and clinical parameters may be useful for selecting patients for BATs. Methods: We performed a 10-year retrospective study in Hong Kong to investigate the performance of BATs associated with tryptase levels (taking during PA) and other clinical parameters. Results: Of 90 patients, 70 (77.8%) showed significant tryptase level elevation and 37 (41.1%) had a positive BAT result. BAT-positive patients presented with significantly higher absolute levels (15.9 µg/L vs 9.1 µg/L; P = .018), absolute elevation (12.8 µg/L vs 7.1 µg/L; P = .012), and fold elevation (5.6- vs 4.1-fold; P = .014) of acute tryptase than did BAT-negative patients. Among patients with positive BAT result, 94.6% (35 of 37) demonstrated elevated acute tryptase, significantly more than the BAT-negative group (66.0%; P < .001). In regression analysis, tryptase elevation was the sole significant factor correlated to BAT positivity (odds ratio, 10.14; 95% CI, 2.15-47.85; P = .003). Overall, elevated acute tryptase demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.7% and a negative predictive value of 90.0% in predicting positive results with BATs. Conclusions: We observed that tryptase elevation is a very sensitive predictor of BAT positivity among patients with identified culprits of PA. Acute elevation of tryptase would not only aid in confirming anaphylaxis but may also help guide the decision toward selecting labor-intensive and costly in vitro tests such as BATs.

Prospective, Multicenter, Head-to-Head Comparison Between Allergists Versus Nonallergists in Low-Risk Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: Effectiveness, Safety, and Quality of Life (HK-DADI2).

BACKGROUND: Penicillin "allergy" labels are prevalent but frequently misdiagnosed. Mislabelled allergies are associated with adverse outcomes and increased antimicrobial resistance. With an urgent need to delabel the overwhelming number of mislabeled allergies, nonallergist evaluations have been advocated for low-risk individuals. Despite growing interest in non-allergist-led initiatives, evidence on their effectiveness, safety, and impact by direct comparisons is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the comparative outcomes of penicillin allergy evaluations conducted by allergists versus nonallergists. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, pragmatic study was conducted at 4 tertiary hospitals (1 allergist- vs 3 non-allergist-led) for low-risk penicillin allergy patients in Hong Kong-the Hong Kong Drug Allergy Delabelling Initiative 2 (HK-DADI2). RESULTS: Among 228 low-risk patients who underwent testing (32.9% by allergists, 67.1% by nonallergists), only 14 (6.1%) had positive penicillin allergy testing results. Delabeling rates (94.1% vs 93.3%; P = .777), positive skin test results (2.6% vs 2.7%; P > .99), and drug provocation test results (3.3% vs 2.7%; P = 1.000) were similar between allergists and nonallergists. There were no systemic reactions in either cohort. All patients had significant improvements in health-related quality of life (Drug Hypersensitivity Quality of Life Questionnaire scores -5.00 vs -8.33; P = .072). Nonallergist evaluations had shorter waiting times (0.57 vs 15.7 months; P < .001), whereas allergists required fewer consultations with higher rate of completing evaluations within a single visit (odds ratio, 0.04; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: With training and support, nonallergists can independently evaluate low-risk penicillin allergies. Compared with allergists, evaluation of low-risk penicillin allergy by nonallergists can be comparably effective, safe, and impactful on quality of life. More multidisciplinary partnerships to empower nonallergists to conduct allergy evaluations should be encouraged.

Disparities in chronic spontaneous urticaria: Eligibility for drug reimbursement associated with clinical outcomes.

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an immunologic condition with an estimated prevalence of 0.1%. For CSU that is poorly controlled despite the use of antihistamines, omalizumab is the only treatment approved and recommended by international guidelines. Objective: Our aim was to outline the impact of treatment accessibility on CSU outcomes in the real world. Methods: Serial data on adult patients with CSU receiving care for at least 6 months at a dedicated, immunologist-led urticaria clinic at Grantham Hospital in Hong Kong between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed. Patients' clinicodemographic data, drug eligibility status (eligible for reimbursement or not), treatment step, and disease activity (weekly Urticaria Activity Score [UAS7]) were collected and compared according to drug eligibility status. Results: This study included 238 patients, 80 (33.6%) of whom were eligible for reimbursement and 158 of whom were not. No significant clinicodemographic differences, including disease activity, were found at baseline. At latest follow-up, significantly more patients in the eligible group were receiving omalizumab (28.7% vs 5.7% [P < .001]), which is equivalent to a multivariate odds ratio of 9.35 (95% CI = 3.689-23.703 [P < .001]). The discrepancy persisted even in patients with moderate-to-severe CSU whose UAS7 was 16 or higher (40.6% [13 of 32] vs 10.2% [6 of 59]; P < .001). In addition, there was significantly less dose reduction (<300 mg every 4 weeks) in the eligible omalizumab users (4.3% vs 44.4% [P = .015]). Clinically, significantly greater improvements in UAS7 were reported by the eligible group (median change -8.0 vs -5.0 [P = .021]). Conclusion: Patterns of management varied largely among patients with different drug eligibility statuses and led to disparities in health outcomes. More efforts to secure equitable access to guideline-based CSU care are warranted.

Enhancing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Drug Hypersensitivity: A Validated 6-Item Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Patients With Drug Hypersensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) can significantly impair patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, tools for HRQoL assessment for patients with DHR are time-consuming and remain underutilized. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an optimized version of the Drug Hypersensitivity Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DrHy-Q) designed for everyday clinical use. METHODS: Item response theory (IRT), a statistical framework for psychometric measurement, was used to evaluate the 15 questions from the original DrHy-Q for their respective item difficulty, discrimination, and information using prospective data from 243 patients with histories of suspected/confirmed DHR before allergy workup. Accordingly, the best-performing items were identified to develop a 6-item optimized version (DrHy-Q6), which was subsequently validated with another prospective cohort of 156 patients. RESULTS: All 15 items of the original DrHy-Q demonstrated satisfactory parameters in IRT analysis, including very high discrimination (>1.7), appropriate difficulty (in between -1.5 and 1.5), and good information (a high and broad peak in the information curve). Six items with top-ranked IRT parameters were identified to construct an optimized version, which we named the DrHy-Q6. The DrHy-Q6 demonstrated a 1-factor structure with an improved fit compared with the original DrHy-Q (comparative fit index = 0.985, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.974), excellent convergent validity (unadjusted Pearson correlation with the full version = 0.955; adjusted = 0.894, P < .001), reliability (Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω = 0.93), divergent validity (Pearson correlation with all Short Form 12-item Health Survey Version 2 subscales <0.60, P < .001), and discriminant validity (significantly higher scores with multiple DHR labels [42.45 ± 27.26 vs 32.93 ± 26.66], P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: From an IRT perspective, the DrHy-Q and all its constituent items are psychometrically valid for HRQoL assessment. We propose an optimized 6-item version (DrHy-Q6) as an abbreviated alternative for assessing HRQoL in patients with DHR, especially for routine use in clinical practice. Patients and physicians may benefit from its streamlined length and simpler scoring algorithm.

Clinical utility of and correlation between Sniffin' Sticks and TIB smell identification test (TIBSIT) among Hong Kong Chinese with or without chronic rhinosinusitis.

Introduction: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is common among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Validated and culturally specific tests, such as the "Sniffin' Sticks" test (SST) and the TIB Smell Identification Test (TIBSIT), are crucial for the diagnosis and monitoring of OD. However, they have not been utilised in Hong Kong Chinese and their correlations are unknown. Methods: Twelve CRS patients and twenty healthy volunteers were prospectively recruited from a joint allergy-otorhinolaryngology clinic in Hong Kong and performed both SST and TIBSIT. Demographics, baseline characteristics and all test results were compared and analysed. Results: Patients with CRS demonstrated significantly lower test scores than healthy controls (all p < 0.001). Significant and strong correlations were observed between all composite and subtest scores, particularly between the composite SST and TIBSIT scores (ρ = 0.789, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of CRS and increasing age were significantly associated with OD. Conclusion: Both SST and TIBSIT are useful olfactory tests and are strongly correlated among Hong Kong Chinese. We advocate that either test can be used for measuring OD among CRS patients.

Identifying the most at-risk age-group and longitudinal trends of drug allergy labeling amongst 7.3 million individuals in Hong Kong.

BACKGROUND: Incorrect drug 'allergy' labels remain a global public health concern. Identifying regional trends of drug allergy labeling can guide appropriate public health interventions, but longitudinal or population drug allergy studies remain scarce. We analysed the serial epidemiology of drug allergy labeling to identify specific subgroups at highest risk of drug allergy labeling for potential interventions. METHODS: Longitudinal, population-wide drug allergy labels and clinical data from over 7,337,778 individuals in Hong Kong between 2016 and 2021 were analysed. RESULTS: The absolute prevalence and incidence of documented drug allergy were 5.61% and 277/100,000 population, respectively. Annual incidence of new allergy labels was stable between 2016 and 2019, until a significant drop in 2020 (-16.3%) during the COVID19 pandemic. The most common allergy labels were anti-infectives (245,832 [44.5%]), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (106,843 [19.3%]), and nervous system drugs (45,802 [8.3%]). The most common labeled culprits for the most severe immediate-type (anaphylaxis) and non-immediate-type (Stevens-Johnson syndrome) reactions were beta-lactams and nervous system drugs, respectively. For individuals at highest risk of labeling, there was significantly higher incidence of overall drug and beta-lactam allergy labeling amongst individuals aged > 40 years which contributed to the majority of newly labeled allergies (377,004, 68.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to traditional dogma, we identified disproportionately higher incidence of drug allergy labeling amongst older individuals, rather than the paediatric age group. We advocate for more population-wide drug allergy studies to investigate this phenomenon in other cohorts as well as future preventative and delabeling efforts focusing on the adult population.

Long-term prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema: Initial experiences with garadacimab and lanadelumab.

Background: With no approved long-term prophylaxis (LTP) for the prevention of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks in Hong Kong, patients rely on compassionate use programs and drug trials. Moreover, studies regarding the use and efficacy of LTP in Asia are lacking. Objectives: Our aim was to assess 2 LTP medications for HAE in Hong Kong: lanadelumab and garadacimab. Methods: A prospective study was performed. Adult patients with a diagnosis of type I or type II HAE with 1 or more expert-confirmed attacks per month were consecutively recruited. The patients had been receiving treatment for at least 6 months. Clinical data were obtained, and questionnaires were administered before treatment periodically for at least 6 months following initiation of LTP. Results: Almost one-third of the patients with HAE experienced frequent attacks and began receiving LTP (8 of the 11 received garadacimab and 3 of the 11 received lanadelumab). At baseline, the time-normalized number of HAE attacks was 2.5 plus or minus 1.3 per month. At month 6, there was an overall reduction of time-normalized number of attacks per month of -2.4 attacks per month (95% CI = -3.3 to -1.5. [P < .01]). The time-normalized number of HAE attacks at month 6 was 0.1 plus or minus 0.1 per month. More than 70% of the patients (8 of 11) were completely attack-free during the 6-month period while receiving LTP, and no patients required hospitalization. LTP improved patients' scores of the Angioedema Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (P < .001) and reduced activity impairment due to health (P = .008). Patients experienced significant improvement across all dimensions of the Treatment Satisfaction for Medication Questionnaire (54.5%-76.8% [P = .002]), and no adverse events were reported. Conclusion: The patients receiving LTP with garadacimab and lanadelumab experienced a significant reduction in number of HAE attacks and improvement in quality of life, and they were satisfied with treatment.

Epidemiology, outcomes, and disproportionate burden of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis from the Hong Kong Multidisciplinary Anaphylaxis Management Initiative (HK-MAMI).

Background: Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening allergic reaction that poses a considerable burden on populations across all ethnicities and age groups. The Hong Kong Multidisciplinary Anaphylaxis Management Initiative (HK-MAMI) was established to streamline the assessment of patients with anaphylaxis via a multidisciplinary and protocol-driven approach. Objective: This prospective study aims to define the etiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment of patients with anaphylaxis in Hong Kong. Methods: Prospective clinical data from allergologic investigations from patients who completed evaluation by the HK-MAMI pathway between January 2017 and August 2022 were analyzed. Results: Of the 161 patients referred via the HK-MAMI, 131 (81.4%) met the diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis. The median delay in diagnosis was 2 years (range 0-30 years). The majority of anaphylaxis cases were attributed to food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA), especially wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. In acute management settings, paired tryptase samples were taken in only around one-third of anaphylaxis cases, with 82.5% of the samples demonstrating significant elevation. There was a general underprescription of adrenaline autoinjectors, especially for food-related anaphylaxis. Patients with FDEIA had later ages of onset and diagnosis, and they presented with more cardiovascular manifestations. Skin prick tests and specific IgE level tests were able to diagnose 95% of FDEIA cases. Conclusion: Our study highlights the significant burden of FDEIA, and especially WDEIA, in Hong Kong, its association with severe presentations, and difficulties encountered in emergency or primary care settings. We advocate appropriate adrenaline use during acute-care management and discharge plans, as well as taking serum mast cell tryptase samples during acute episodes. Interdisciplinary collaboration remains crucial to upholding proper and optimized care for patients with anaphylaxis in Hong Kong.

Validation of the Chinese drug hypersensitivity quality of life questionnaire: Role of delabeling.

The Drug Hypersensitivity Quality of Life Questionnaire (DrHy-Q) is not currently available in Chinese. Besides, penicillin allergy (PA) is a worldwide public health challenge, and delabeling inauthentic PA can improve clinical and economic outcomes. However, its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains poorly known. Objective: The study objective is to translate and validate a Chinese version of DrHy-Q and investigate the effect of PA delabeling on HRQoL using DrHy-Q. Methods: A Chinese DrHy-Q was translated then completed by patients with drug allergy labels for psychometric validation. Afterwards, another cohort of patients finished the Chinese DrHy-Q before and after their PA workup for pre-post comparison. Results: A total of 130 patients were studied. Sixty-three patients (79.4% female; median age = 59 ± 15 years) completed the Chinese DrHy-Q for validation (mean score = 38.9 ± 23.5). It demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.956; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.939-0.971) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.993 [95% CI, 0.969-0.998]). Construct validity was confirmed by its one-dimensional structure in factor analysis. Divergent validity was established because only 2 (out of 9) SF-36 scales showed weak negative correlations to DrHy-Q. Patients with multiple implicated drugs presented significantly higher DrHy-Q scores than those with only a single drug (42.0 ± 22.5 vs 28.7 ± 24.4; P = 0.038), showing discriminant validity. Subsequently, another 67 patients (73.1% female; median age = 56 ± 15 years) underwent PA investigations and completed their pre-post DrHy-Q. A significant drop in DrHy-Q score was shown (40.8 ± 21.7 vs 26.6 ± 22.5; Cohen's d = 0.964; P < 0.001), reflecting improvement in HRQoL. Conclusion: The Chinese DrHy-Q is reliable and valid for HRQoL assessment. PA delabeling significantly benefits patients' HRQoL. Future larger-scale studies are warranted to corroborate our findings.

Prospective Assessment of Penicillin Allergy (PAPA): Evaluating the performance of penicillin allergy testing and post-delabelling outcomes among Hong Kong Chinese.

BACKGROUND: Incorrect penicillin 'allergy' labels predispose patients to adverse outcomes but are under-recognised in many Asian countries. Studies on performance and post-delabelling outcomes of penicillin allergy evaluation among Chinese remain scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of allergy testing and post-delabelling outcomes among Chinese patients in a prospective penicillin allergy cohort - Prospective Assessment of Penicillin Allergy (PAPA). METHODS: All adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who underwent penicillin allergy evaluation between January 2020 to December 2021 were recruited and prospectively reviewed by both medical records and individual interviews at least 6 months after delabelling or allergy confirmation. RESULTS: Out of 372 patients who completed penicillin allergy evaluation, 335 (90%) patients were delabelled. The overall negative predictive value of penicillin skin testing was 95%, but lower for patients with non-immediate type reactions (88%). History of non-immediate symptom onset (OR = 4.501 [95%CI = 2.085-9.716], p < 0.001) and duration since index reaction (OR = 0.942 [95%CI = 0.899-0.987], p = 0.012) were associated with positive skin testing. After at least 6 months, 60 (18%) of de-labelled patients had received penicillins again without any adverse reactions. Fluoroquinolone-use was significantly lower among delabelled patients compared to those with penicillin allergy (38[11%] vs 11[30%], p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: After at least 6 months, one in six delabelled patients already received penicillins again safely, with significantly lower fluoroquinolone usage. None experienced adverse reactions. History of non-immediate onset and shorter duration since index reaction were associated with genuine allergy. In patients with severe non-immediate reactions, skin tests should be supplemented with thorough clinical history and adjunct diagnostic evaluations.

A case of persistent IgE sensitisation almost two decades following ampicillin anaphylaxis

Background: Although most immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated penicillin allergy wanes with time, sensitisation may occasionally persist for many years. Previous reports on the loss of penicillin-specific IgE sensitisation were based on non-anaphylaxis cases and, although uncommon, persistent sensitisation may still be possible in the minority of cases. Objective: This case highlights that irrespective of the elapsed duration since the index reaction, it is important to remain vigilant when approaching patients with a history of severe reactions. Material and Methods: We described a case of persistent IgE sensitisation almost two decades following ampicillin anaphylaxis. Results: A 78-year-old male with a history of perioperative penicillin anaphylaxis in 2003 was referred for allergy workup in 2022 before his knee joint replacement surgery. The patient had strictly avoided all beta-lactams since the index reaction. However, his penicillin-specific sensitisation persisted, evidenced by positive skin tests (with generalised urticaria after intradermal testing) and basophil activation tests. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this was the first case of positive BAT tested around two decades following the index reaction. This case illustrates that a cautious approach may still be warranted in patients with a history of severe reaction to penicillin regardless of the duration since the reported index reaction (AU)

A case of persistent IgE sensitisation almost two decades following ampicillin anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Although most immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated penicillin allergy wanes with time, sensitisation may occasionally persist for many years. Previous reports on the loss of penicillin-specific IgE sensitisation were based on non-anaphylaxis cases and, although uncommon, persistent sensitisation may still be possible in the minority of cases. OBJECTIVE: This case highlights that irrespective of the elapsed duration since the index reaction, it is important to remain vigilant when approaching patients with a history of severe reactions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We described a case of persistent IgE sensitisation almost two decades following ampicillin anaphylaxis. RESULTS: A 78-year-old male with a history of perioperative penicillin anaphylaxis in 2003 was referred for allergy workup in 2022 before his knee joint replacement surgery. The patient had strictly avoided all beta-lactams since the index reaction. However, his penicillin-specific sensitisation persisted, evidenced by positive skin tests (with generalised urticaria after intradermal testing) and basophil activation tests. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this was the first case of positive BAT tested around two decades following the index reaction. This case illustrates that a cautious approach may still be warranted in patients with a history of severe reaction to penicillin regardless of the duration since the reported index reaction.

Ten-year outcomes of Perioperative Anaphylaxis Workup Study in Hong Kong (PAWS-HK): Performance of diagnostic modalities.

BACKGROUND: Studies on perioperative anaphylaxis (PA) in Asia are lacking. Furthermore, allergy workup for PA has largely been limited to the "silver standard" of skin tests (ST). Using in vitro tests as an adjunct to ST may improve and overcome these diagnostic challenges. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and diagnostic tests of patients with suspected PA through the Perioperative Anaphylaxis Workup Study in Hong Kong cohort. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of PA over a 10-year period were recruited into the Perioperative Anaphylaxis Workup Study in Hong Kong. We reviewed the medical records, tryptase elevation, and diagnostic tests including ST, specific immunoglobulin E, and basophil activation tests (BAT). RESULTS: In 151 patients with PA, diagnosis was reached in three-fourths of the cases (113/151, 74.8%). The most common culprits identified were neuromuscular blocking agents (25.8%), ß lactams (17.2%) and chlorhexidine (13.9%). Severe anaphylaxis was associated with female sex, older age, elevated acute tryptase levels, and more cardiovascular manifestations during induction. Skin tests remained the most sensitive diagnostic modality overall (66.2%). BAT showed better performance for chlorhexidine and gelofusine anaphylaxis, with sensitivity of 80.0% and 79.6%, respectively. Specific Immunoglobulin E indicated even higher sensitivity (95.2%) than did ST (85.0%) and BAT (80.0%) for chlorhexidine anaphylaxis but performed poorly for other drugs. CONCLUSION: Neuromuscular blocking agents remain the most common culprit in PA. There was a higher prevalence of gelofusine anaphylaxis in our cohort than was seen in the literature. Skin tests remain the most sensitive testing modality. In vitro tests for chlorhexidine and gelofusine showed promising results, but more studies to further elucidate its use are warranted.

Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Hong Kong: Clinical Characteristics, Real-World Practice and Implications for COVID-19 Vaccination.

PURPOSE: The real-world management and clinical characteristics of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in Hong Kong and its implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination are unknown. We investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with CSU and the role of an immunologist-led Urticaria Clinic as well as the impact of CSU on COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Hong Kong. METHODS: Longitudinal clinical data of 257 CSU patients were collected and analyzed. Association analyses were performed to identify the relationships between variables and factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake. RESULTS: After the immunologist review, the Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) was significantly lower than baseline (median: 0.00 vs. 12.0, P < 0.001). Changes in UAS7 were significantly greater among patients with baseline UAS7 ≥ 16 compared to those with UAS7 < 16 (median: -24.0 vs. -2.00, P < 0.001). CSU patients had lower COVID-19 vaccination rates than the general population with only 176 (68.5%) and 165 (65.0%) receiving at least one dose and 2 doses of vaccination, respectively. The presence of concomitant suspected drug allergy was associated with lower COVID-19 vaccine uptake (odds ratio [OR], 0.47; P = 0.010), while regular pharmacological treatment was associated with higher COVID-19 vaccine uptake among CSU patients (OR, 3.79; P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: A dedicated immunologist-led Urticaria Clinic may effectively improve CSU management and outcomes in Hong Kong.

COVID-19 Vaccine Allergy Safety Track (VAS-Track) pathway: real-world outcomes on vaccination rates and antibody protection.

BACKGROUND: Misdiagnosed vaccine-related "allergies" lead to unnecessary vaccine deferrals and incomplete vaccinations, leaving patients unprotected against COVID-19. To overcome limitations and queues for Allergist assessment, the "VAS-Track" pathway was developed to evaluate patients via a multi-disciplinary triage model including nurses, non-specialists, and Allergists. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effectiveness and safety of VAS-Track and evaluate its real-world impact in terms of vaccination rates and COVID-19 protection. METHODS: Patients referred to VAS-Track between September 2021 and March 2022 were recruited. Subgroup analysis was performed with prospective pre- and post-clinic antibody levels. RESULTS: Nurse-assisted screening identified 10,412 (76%) referrals as inappropriate. 369 patients were assessed by VAS-Track. Overall, 100% of patients were recommended to complete vaccination and 332 (90%) completed their primary series. No patients reported any significant allergic reactions following subsequent vaccination. Vaccination completion rates between patients seen by non-specialists and additional Allergist review were similar (90% vs. 89%, p = 0.617). Vaccination rates were higher among patients with prior history of immediate-type reactions (odds ratio: 2.43, p = 0.025). Subgroup analysis revealed that only 20% (56/284) of patients had seropositive COVID-19 neutralizing antibody levels (≥ 15 AU/mL) prior to VAS-Track, which increased to 92% after vaccine completion (pre-clinic antibody level 6.0 ± 13.5 AU/mL vs. post-clinic antibody level 778.8 ± 337.4 AU/mL, p > 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A multi-disciplinary allergy team was able to streamline our COVID-19 VAS services, enabling almost all patients to complete their primary series, significantly boosting antibody levels and real-world COVID-19 protection. We propose similar multidisciplinary models to be further utilized, especially in the settings with limited allergy services.