RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a common and serious complication arising predominantly in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. International data demonstrate that infection is one of the most common precipitating causes of DKA. Currently there are limited data regarding the role of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in this setting. AIM: To provide epidemiologic data regarding infections precipitating DKA, microbiological aetiology and antimicrobial prescribing practices in order to inform AMS interventions. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all type 1 diabetes mellitus DKA presentations from May 2015 to June 2018. RESULTS: In total, 249 DKA presentations occurred in 111 patients. Suspected infection accounted for 100/249 (40%) presentations, and only 36/249 (14.5%) were proven or probable infections. Skin and soft tissue infection was the most common (9/36, 25%), followed by urinary tract infection (8/36, 22%) and respiratory tract infection (7/36, 19%). A pathogen was identified in 24/100 presumed infections and included Staphylococcus aureus (24, 46%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (4/24, 17%) and Escherichia coli (3/24, 13%). No viral pathogens were identified. Of 80 empirical antimicrobial prescriptions, 75% were inappropriate based on guideline management of the documented suspected infection. Single agent ceftriaxone was appropriately prescribed in 7/23 (30%) cases, and was most frequently prescribed overall 23/80 (29%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a lower incidence of infection compared to most previous publications, and suggests that infection-precipitated DKA may be over reported. Furthermore, our findings provide support for the role of AMS in the management of DKA.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Cetoacidosis Diabética/epidemiología , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/normas , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Queensland/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosAsunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Legionella pneumophila/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/diagnóstico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economía , Humanos , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/epidemiología , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/microbiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Queensland/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The aim of this paper was to determine the correlation between serum cryptococcal antigen and a diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis in the immunocompetent cohort. A retrospective multicentre analysis of immunocompetent patients diagnosed and treated for cryptococcal meningitis between January 2000 and December 2017 was performed. Sixty-seven of the 143 cases of cryptococcosis occurred in immunocompetent patients. The serum cryptococcal antigen titre was significantly higher in the meningitis group [1â:â256 (IQR: 64-1024)] compared with that for non-meningitis patients [1â:â64 (IQR: 8-256)], P=0.012. The relative risk of meningitis with a serum cryptococcal antigen (CRAG) >1â:â64 was 1.8 (95â% CI: 1.15-2.82). This study demonstrates a clear correlation between serum cryptococcal antigen titre and meningitis. While the serum titre is not definitive for meningitis, in resource-limited settings or cases where lumbar puncture may be contraindicated, this evidence may aid diagnosis and subsequent therapeutic decisions.