Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 86(5): 398-403, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35133669

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the traditional understanding is that contact sensitization is less frequent in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), recent studies have shown similar or higher rates of positive patch-test results in AD patients. OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterise the pattern of contact sensitization in patients with and without AD and evaluate the association between AD and contact sensitization. METHOD: This was a single-center, 10-year retrospective review of patients who underwent patch testing between 2007 and 2017. RESULTS: There were 4903 patients (male-to-female ratio = 1:1.4; mean age 40.1 years) included. About half (2499, 51.0%) of all patients developed at least one positive reaction. The top five frequent reactions were to nickel sulfate (45.4%), potassium dichromate (16.0%), p-phenylenediamine (13.4%), Myroxylon pereirae (11.8%), and fragrance mix I (11.2%). The overall prevalence of contact sensitization was not significantly different between patients with or without AD. Patients with AD were less likely to develop contact allergies to budesonide and thiuram mix, and more likely to develop contact allergies to potassium dichromate. CONCLUSIONS: Contact sensitization was detected in 50% of patients who were patch tested. Nickel sulfate was the most frequently sensitizing allergen. The prevalence of contact allergies in atopic patients is comparable to that in non-atopic patients.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Atópica , Dermatología , Adulto , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Atópica/inducido químicamente , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Dicromato de Potasio/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 39(1): 69-76, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34971009

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is increasingly prevalent. Patch testing is the gold-standard diagnostic investigation. The aims of our study were to describe the clinical profile of pediatric patients with ACD in a multi-ethnic Asian population and identify the common contact allergens. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger with clinically suspected ACD who underwent patch testing between January 2007 and March 2020 at two institutions in Singapore. Information pertaining to their demographics, atopy history, clinical presentation, and patch test results was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 252 patients were included. The mean age was 10.9 years (1.0-16.7 years). The majority were Chinese (79.8%) and girls (57.5%). Many (66.3%) had atopic dermatitis (AD), which was mild. The most common presentation was an acral eczematous rash. The sensitization rate was 50.0%. The most frequent reactions were to nickel sulfate (49.2%) and fragrance mix (19.1%). The overall rate of relevant positive patch tests was 72.5%. Patients with AD were less likely to have a reaction to fragrance mix (p = .019) and more likely to have a reaction to disperse blue (p = .041). Compared to younger children, adolescents were less likely to have a positive patch test (p = .008). Indians were also less likely to have a positive reaction (p = .004). CONCLUSION: Metals and fragrances were the most common allergens causing childhood ACD in Singapore. Patients with AD were less likely to be sensitized to fragrances and more likely to be sensitized to disperse blue dye.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Atópica , Adolescente , Alérgenos , Niño , Preescolar , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pruebas del Parche , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
PLoS One ; 14(8): e0218158, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31369586

RESUMEN

Physical education professionals aim to develop quality programmes for physical education. This study aimed to develop and validate a scale using professionals' perceptions of Quality Physical Education QPE in Asia using twenty-four items regarding QPE quality issues. The items covered status and roles, development of educational elements and supportive features in physical education. A sample of N = 799 sport and physical education professionals from eleven Asian cities participated in this questionnaire survey. Twenty-four items relating to QPE were examined via exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using maximum likelihood extraction and direct oblimin rotation methods. Nevertheless, only 20 items were extracted following the EFA examination. Items 1, 9, 14 and 18 were excluded because of low factor loadings. The remaining items were clustered into four subscales: Development and Supportive Elements for Quality Physical Education in Schools (DSFQPE; α = .918), Core Values of Quality Physical Education (CVPE; α = .908), Curriculum Arrangement of Physical Activities (CAPA; α = .884) and Provision and Norms in Physical Education (PNPE; α = .865). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α = .875) indicated excellent internal consistency for the overall measure. Furthermore, the 4 retained factors from the EFA were assessed via robust confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The 4-factor model demonstrated a good fit with the data (CMIN/DF = 3.450, CFI = .928, TLI = .916, PCFI = .801, RMSEA = .078). The study identified a 4-factor structure with internal consistency and acceptable interfactor correlations. The structure seemed to be applicable, including the twenty items identified as useful and necessary tools for the framework of analysis in the investigation of diverse settings for the study of quality physical education.


Asunto(s)
Educación Profesional/normas , Educación y Entrenamiento Físico/métodos , Maestros/psicología , Instituciones Académicas/normas , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
J Glob Oncol ; 2(4): 186-199, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28717701

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The value of screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection before chemotherapy for nonhematopoietic solid tumors remains unsettled. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of universal screening before systemic therapy for sarcomas, including GI stromal tumors (GISTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Drawing from the National Cancer Centre Singapore database of 1,039 patients with sarcomas, we analyzed the clinical records of 485 patients who received systemic therapy. Using a Markov model, we compared the cost effectiveness of a screen-all versus screen-none strategy in this population. RESULTS: A total of 237 patients were screened for HBV infection. No patients developed HBV reactivation during chemotherapy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of offering HBV screening to all patients with sarcomas and patients with GISTs exceeded the cost-effectiveness threshold of SG$100,000 per QALY. This result was robust in one-way sensitivity analysis. Our results show that only changes in mortality rate secondary to HBV reactivation could make the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio cross the cost-effectiveness threshold. CONCLUSION: Universal HBV screening in patients with sarcomas or GISTs undergoing chemotherapy is not cost effective at a willingness to pay of SG$100,000 per QALY and may not be required.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA