RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Iloprost is recommend worldwide for the treatment of RP and the healing of DUs. The aim of this study is to report the regimens of Iloprost administered in different rheumatological centers within the same regional Health System Methods: A questionnaire exploring different items related to the use of Iloprost was developed and reviewed by three expert rheumatologists. The questionnaire was distributed as an online survey to all local SSc referral centers in Emilia-Romagna (Italy). Data are reported as percentage or median with interquartile range (IQR), as appropriate. An updated review of world literature on this topic was also carried out. RESULTS: All the invited centers completed the survey. There were both local (8) and university hospitals (4). The majority (58%) had a rheumatologist as head physician. All centers used Iloprost: a single monthly administration was the most common treatment (75%). The cycle lasted 1 [IQR 1-2] days with a 0.5-2.0 ng/Kg/min dose according to the drug tolerance of the patients. There were overall 68 spots (beds, reclining armchair, or simple armchair); 2.0 [1.5-4.0] patients were able to receive Iloprost at the same time. University Hospitals had more physicians at their disposal than local hospitals but less paramedic personnel (respectively: 1.8 vs 1.2 physicians, 1.5 vs 2.1 nurses). CONCLUSIONS: These observations were in line with the majority of previous studies reporting different regimens, comparing similar (but not identical) dose and schedule administration, however, despite differences being at times substantial, no standard infusion method is yet available.
Asunto(s)
Iloprost , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Humanos , Iloprost/uso terapéutico , Iloprost/efectos adversos , Epoprostenol/uso terapéutico , Prostaglandinas I , Cicatrización de Heridas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Esclerodermia Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
We reviewed 11 patients with systemic sclerosis-related ILD who were referred to our Scleroderma Unit from January 2020 to January 2021 and started Nintedanib. Non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) was prevalent (45%), usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and UIP/NSIP pattern were both 27%. Only one patient had a history of smoking. Eight patients were on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), eight were treated with corticosteroids (mean dose 5 mg/day of Prednisone or equivalent), and three were on Rituximab. The mean modified British Council Medical Questionnaire (mmRC) decreased from 3 to 2.5. Two patients had to reduce their daily dose to 200 mg/day for severe diarrhoea. Nintedanib was generally well tolerated.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Mixed cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis (MCV) is an immune-complex-mediated systemic vasculitis characterised by heterogeneous clinical manifestations mainly involving lymphatic system, skin, kidney and peripheral nervous system. Although MCV patients have been included in priority programs for vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in Italy, limited information is available for these patients. The aims of this multicentre Italian study were to investigate SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rate in MCV patients and its safety profile. METHODS: All MCV patients referring to participating centres were assessed with an interview-based survey about vaccination, reasons for not getting vaccinated, adverse events (AE), and disease flares within a month after vaccination. RESULTS: A total of 416 patients were included in the study. Among participants, 7.7% did not get vaccinated, mainly for fear related to vaccine side-effects (50%) or medical decision (18.8%). They were more frequently treated with chronic glucocorticoids or rituximab (p=0.049 and p=0.043, respectively). Mild and self-limiting AE were recorded in 31.7% of cases, while post-vaccination vasculitis flares were observed in 5.3% of subjects. Disease relapses were mainly observed in patients with peripheral neuropathy or skin vasculitis (40% and 25%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has been performed in a high percentage of MCV patients with encouraging safety profile. Vasculitis flares rate was in line with that observed for other autoimmune diseases, despite patients with purpura or peripheral neuropathy seem to be at risk for symptoms' exacerbation. Patients' hesitancy, rituximab and glucocorticoids treatment were the main reasons for delaying vaccination.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Crioglobulinemia , Arteritis de Células Gigantes , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis , Poliarteritis Nudosa , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Glucocorticoides , Italia/epidemiología , Rituximab , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of topical cannabidiol (CBD) in treating digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: In total, 45 patients with SSc who had digital ulcers were consecutively enrolled between January 2019 and December 2019. Of the participants, 25 were treated with CBD during surgical debridement and 20 were treated with standard local therapy. A numeric rating scale for pain and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index were administered at the baseline and at the end of treatment. RESULTS: Local treatment with CBD was significantly associated with lower pain scores, higher health assessment scores, and an increase in participants' total hours of sleep. Patients in the control group more frequently required additional analgesic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Topical CBD may be a valuable tool to treat pain related to digital ulcers in patients with SSc.
Asunto(s)
Cannabidiol , Esclerodermia Localizada , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Úlcera Cutánea , Humanos , Cannabidiol/uso terapéutico , Úlcera Cutánea/etiología , Úlcera Cutánea/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Localizada/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , DolorRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Skin ulcers (SU) represent one of the most frequent manifestations of systemic sclerosis (SSc), occurring in almost 50% of scleroderma patients. SSc-SU are often particularly difficult to treat with conventional systemic and local therapies. In this study, a preliminary evaluation of the role and effectiveness of blue light photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy with EmoLED® in the treatment of scleroderma skin ulcers (SSc-SU) was performed. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 12 consecutive SSc patients with a total of 15 SU on finger hands. All patients were treated with adequate systemic therapy and local treatment for SU; after a standard skin ulcer bed preparation with debridement of all lesions, EmoLED® was performed. All patients were locally treated every week during 2 months of follow-up; SU data were collected after 4 weeks (T4) and 8 weeks (T8). Eight SSc patients with comparable SU were also evaluated as controls. RESULTS: The application of EmoLED® in addition to debridement apparently produced faster healing of SU. Complete healing of SU was recorded in 41.6% cases during EmoLED® treatment. Significant improvements in SU area, length, and width, wound bed, and related pain were observed in EmoLED® patients from T0 to T8. Control subjects treated with standard systemic/local therapies merely showed an amelioration of SU area and width at the end of the follow-up. No procedural or post-procedural adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The positive clinical results and the absence of side effects suggest that EmoLED® could be a promising tool in the management of SSc-SU, with an interesting role to play in the healing process in addition to conventional systemic and local treatments.
RESUMEN
Systemic sclerosis is a connective tissue disease with cutaneous involvement. Clinical manifestations result from the balance of inflammations/autoimmunity process and fibrogenesis. Patients suffer from skin ulcers, non-ulcerative lesions including digital pitting scars, telangiectasias, subungual hyperkeratosis, abrasions, fissures, and subcutaneous calcinosis. A review about the pathophysiology of the disease, the physical examination of the patients, the instrumental assessment, and possible treatments is performed.