The clinical effectiveness of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula in determining the internal length of a nasogastric tube in adults: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate determination of the internal length of nasogastric tubes is essential for the safe and effective completion of blind insertions, a routine nursing procedure. The widely used nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance lacks evidence and effectiveness. A recent randomized controlled trial proposed an alternative, the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula. However, its effectiveness in real-world clinical practice has not yet been studied. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the real-world clinical effectiveness of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula for determining the internal nasogastric tube length in adult patients admitted to hospitalization or intensive care units. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective clinical effectiveness study was conducted, utilizing routinely collected observational data. SETTING AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Between October 2020 and November 2022, 358 adult patients in a general hospital requiring a nasogastric feeding tube were included. The primary outcome involved assessing nasogastric tube tip positioning (>3 cm below the lower esophageal sphincter) by an advanced practice nurse through X-ray verification. Secondary outcomes, obtained from patient records for a random subgroup of 100 participants, were reporting clarity and evaluation of the tip position by reviewing radiologists. RESULTS: Following evaluation by an advanced practice nurse, all nasogastric feeding tubes were determined to be correctly positioned. Among the subgroup of 100 tubes, X-ray protocols, as documented by the reviewing radiologists, showed varying levels of reporting clarity for the tube tip: 4.0 % lacked reporting, 33.0 % had ambiguous reporting and 63.0 % had unambiguous reporting. CONCLUSION: The corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula demonstrates potential to emerge as a safer alternative to existing methods for determining the internal length of nasogastric tubes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: In addition to healthcare provider education and training, a checklist-based framework is recommended for radiologists to unambiguously report nasogastric tube tip positions.

Effectiveness of glutamine and arginine in wound healing of pressure ulcers: A systematic review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Various nutrients play a physiological role in the healing process of pressure ulcers (PUs). Nutritional interventions include the administration of enteral nutritional supplements and formulas containing arginine, glutamine, and micronutrients. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of enteral nutritional supplements and formulas containing arginine and glutamine on wound-related outcomes. These include (1) time to healing, (2) changes in wound size, (3) local wound infection, (4) PU recurrence, and (5) PU-related pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This protocol was developed according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). A search will be conducted in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL (EBSCOhost interface) and Web of Science. In addition, a manual search will be conducted to identify relevant records. Except for systematic reviews, no restrictions will be placed on the study design, the population studied or the setting. Studies that do not address PUs, in vitro studies and studies that do not report wound-related outcomes will be excluded. Study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction will be performed independently by three researchers. Depending on the extent of heterogeneity of interventions, follow-up time and populations, results will be summarised either by meta-analysis or narrative synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review to identify, evaluate and summarise the current evidence for enteral arginine and glutamine supplementation on wound-related outcomes in PUs. The review will provide a solid basis for deriving valid and clinically relevant conclusions in this area.

The accuracy of methods for determining the internal length of a nasogastric tube in adult patients: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Blind insertion of nasogastric (NG) tubes is performed for several reasons: nutrition and medication administration, gastric aspiration/decompression, and other, diagnostic reasons. Accidental intraesophageal and intestinal placement is common, and increases the risk of serious complications. Therefore, accurate determination of the internal length of the NG tube before placement is considered a prerequisite for achieving correct gastric positioning. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify, assess, and summarize the evidence on the accuracy of methods for determining the internal length of an NG tube in adults. METHODS: Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Web of Science were searched up to 31 January, 2022. Studies were eligible when reporting data on the accuracy of methods for determining internal NG tube length in adults. Study selection, risk-of-bias assessment, and data extraction were performed independently by 2 investigators. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cross Sectional Studies. A narrative synthesis of the results was then conducted. RESULTS: Twelve articles were included in this review. All studies were observational, cross-sectional in nature, except for 1 randomized controlled trial. Ten methods for determining the internal length of an NG tube were described. Correctly positioned NG tubes ranged from 13% to 99%. Results showed that the tip of the nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance (NEX) + 10 cm (mean: 59.9-60.7 cm) and (NEX × 0.38696) + 30.37 + 6 cm (mean: 56.6-56.7 cm) could potentially result in accuracy as high as 97.4% and 99.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current data do not provide conclusive evidence of 100% accuracy in finding a correctly placed NG tube when using a method for determining the internal length. Blind placement, using any of the documented methods, cannot be considered safe without additional verification of tube tip positioning. Furthermore, using any of these 10 methods does not reduce the risk of pulmonary intubation.This systematic review was registered at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ as CRD42021243180.

Effect of a dynamic mattress on chest compression quality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: In-hospital cardiac arrest is a medical emergency that occurs on a regular basis. As patients most at risk for an in-hospital cardiac arrest are usually positioned on a dynamic mattress, it is important to measure the effect of mattress compressibility on chest compression quality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). High-quality CPR is essential for patient survival and good neurological outcome. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of an inflated dynamic overlay mattress on chest compression quality during CPR and to explore the predictive effect of health care providers' anthropometric factors, hand positioning and mattress type on chest compression frequency and depth. DESIGN: Manikin-based single-blinded randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Nursing students (N = 70) were randomised to a control (viscoelastic foam mattress) or intervention group (inflated dynamic overlay mattress on top of a viscoelastic foam mattress) and had to perform chest compressions over a 2-minute period. Compression rate, depth and hand positioning were registered. The 2015 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines were used as a reference. RESULTS: The mean difference in chest compression depth between control and intervention groups was 2.86 mm (P = .043). Both groups met the guidelines for adequate chest compression quality, as recommended by the ERC. A predictive effect of health care providers' body height and weight, mattress type and hand positioning on compression depth could be demonstrated (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: CPR in bedridden patients on a dynamic overlay mattress has a negative effect on the quality of chest compressions. Mean chest compression depth decreases significantly. However, clinical significance of the results may be debatable. Mattress type, body weight and hand positioning appear to be significant predictors for adequate chest compression depth. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: A firm surface under the patient is needed during CPR. Special attention must be paid to correct hand positioning during CPR.

Factors associated with insufficient nasogastric tube visibility on X-ray: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Chest X-ray imaging is frequently used for verifying the position of a blindly inserted nasogastric tube. A high-quality X-ray increases the likelihood of conclusive visibility of tube tip positioning, thus avoiding risks due to a misplaced tube (e.g., pulmonary intubation, pneumothorax, small bowel insertion). Therefore, this study aims to determine patient-related and environmental factors affecting the visibility of nasogastric tubes on X-ray in adults. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive analysis of routinely collected clinical data was performed on all included patients (N = 215) from a prospective randomized trial in a general hospital. A chest X-ray was taken of each patient needing a nasogastric feeding tube, after which visibility and positioning of the tube on X-ray was independently evaluated by 3 radiologists. RESULTS: In 14.9% (n = 32) of all patients, image quality was insufficient, so no conclusive visibility of nasogastric tube positioning could be found. A patient-related predictor regression model (sex, age, body mass index) explained 21% of variance for an insufficient visibility of the nasogastric tube (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.21). An environmental factor regression model demonstrates a guidewire being inside the tube or not during X-ray as a predictor for a conclusive visibility on X-ray. CONCLUSIONS: High body mass index, male sex, and the absence of a guidewire inside the nasogastric tube at the time of chest X-ray are associated with a risk of insufficient visibility of the tube on X-ray. Patient profiles can be defined in which supplementary attention is needed when obtaining chest X-rays whose purpose is to confirm nasogastric tube positioning. KEY POINTS: • The quality of chest X-rays to confirm the positioning of nasogastric tubes in adults can be improved considerably. • There are several factors influencing the confirmation of nasogastric tube positioning on X-ray. • Defining patient profiles at risk for an insufficient visibility of the tube on X-ray will indirectly contribute to an improvement of the chest X-ray quality.

Accuracy of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula for determining nasogastric feeding tube insertion length in intensive care unit patients: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: As nasogastric feeding tube insertion is a frequently applied, non-risk-free nursing technique, a high level of evidence-based nursing care is required. Little evidence is available regarding the accurate determination of the insertion length of nasogastric feeding tubes. The method of using the nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance as measurement is inadequate and not supported by evidence. Findings from a recent randomized trial led to an alternative calculation: the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula: (nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance × 0.38696) + 30.37 + 6 cm. OBJECTIVES: To test the accuracy of the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula for determining the required nasogastric feeding tube insertion length in adults admitted on an intensive care unit and to investigate the probability to successfully obtain gastric aspirate for pH measurement. DESIGN: Prospective, single-center observational study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Adult intensive care unit patients in a general hospital (N = 218) needing a small-bore nasogastric feeding tube were included between March and September 2018. Correct tip positioning was defined as a tube tip located > 3 cm under the lower esophageal sphincter. Tip positioning was verified using X-ray. RESULTS: All nasogastric feeding tube tips were correctly positioned > 3 cm under the lower esophageal sphincter. The chance of successfully obtaining gastric aspirate within 2 h after placement of the tube was 77.9%. CONCLUSIONS: With all tips positioned > 3 cm in the stomach and zero tubes migrating back into the esophagus, the corrected nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance formula can be considered a more accurate method to determine nasogastric feeding tube insertion length.

Comparison of Two Methods for Estimating the Tip Position of a Nasogastric Feeding Tube: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that the nose-earlobe-xiphoid distance (NEX) is inadequate to estimate the insertion length of nasogastric tubes. An alternative approach tested in these studies, which leads to > 90% well-placed nasogastric tubes, used a corrected calculation of the NEX: (NEX × 0.38696) + 30.37. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether using the corrected NEX was more successful than the NEX in determining the insertion length. The secondary aim was to investigate the likelihood to successfully obtain gastric aspirate. METHODS: Adult patients in a general hospital (N = 215) needing a nasogastric tube were randomized to the control (NEX) or intervention group (corrected NEX). Tip positioning was verified using X-ray. Correct tip positioning was defined as between 3 and 10 cm under the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). RESULTS: In >20% of all patients, both methods underestimated the required tube length for correct positioning. The NEX showed an overestimation (17.2%) of the insertion length (>10 cm under the LES) compared with the corrected NEX (4.8%). There was no difference (P = 0.938) between the 2 groups in obtaining gastric aspirate (55.6% vs 56%). However, correct tip positioning resulted in a fourfold increase of obtaining gastric aspirate. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods resulted in a high risk of incorrectly placed tubes due to malposition of the tip near the LES or distal esophagus. This may increase the risk of reflux and pulmonary aspiration. Based on these results, the development of more reliable methods requires consideration.