16th GCC Closed Forum: ICH M10 implementation; NGS, qPCR/dPCR, flow cytometry validation; tissue biomarkers; IS response; immunogenicity harmonization; bioanalytical industry status.

The 16th GCC Closed Forum was held in Orlando, FL, USA, on 23 June 2023. Representatives from international bioanalytical Contract Research Organizations were in attendance in order to discuss scientific and regulatory issues specific to bioanalysis. The issues discussed at the meeting included: IS response, flow cytometry, changes to the bioanalytical industry, NGS assays, biomarker assay for tissues, dPCR validation, immunogenicity harmonization and ICH M10 implementation. Conclusions and consensus from discussions of these topics are included in this article.

Neutralizing Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization.

Evolving immunogenicity assay performance expectations and a lack of harmonized neutralizing antibody validation testing and reporting tools have resulted in significant time spent by health authorities and sponsors on resolving filing queries. A team of experts within the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists' Therapeutic Product Immunogenicity Community across industry and the Food and Drug Administration addressed challenges unique to cell-based and non-cell-based neutralizing antibody assays. Harmonization of validation expectations and data reporting will facilitate filings to health authorities and are described in this manuscript. This team provides validation testing and reporting strategies and tools for the following assessments: (1) format selection; (2) cut point; (3) assay acceptance criteria; (4) control precision; (5) sensitivity including positive control selection and performance tracking; (6) negative control selection; (7) selectivity/specificity including matrix interference, hemolysis, lipemia, bilirubin, concomitant medications, and structurally similar analytes; (8) drug tolerance; (9) target tolerance; (10) sample stability; and (11) assay robustness.

Biological Matrix Supply Chain Shortages: More Matrices Are Now Rare-the Case for Surrogate Matrices.

The COVID-19 pandemic has strained the biological matrix supply chain. An upsurge in demand driven by numerous COVID-19 therapeutic and vaccine development programs to combat the pandemic, along with logistical challenges sourcing and transporting matrix, has led to increased lead times for multiple matrices. Biological matrix shortages can potentially cause significant delays in drug development programs across the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry. Given the current circumstances, discussion is warranted around what will likely be increased use of surrogate matrices in support of pharmacokinetic (PK), immunogenicity, and biomarker assays for regulatory filings. Regulatory authorities permit the use of surrogate matrix in bioanalytical methods in instances where matrix is rare or difficult to obtain, as long as the surrogate is appropriately selected and scientifically justified. Herein, the scientific justification and possible regulatory implications of employing surrogate matrix in PK, immunogenicity, and biomarker assays are discussed. In addition, the unique challenges that cell and gene therapy (C>) and other innovative therapeutic modalities place on matrix supply chains are outlined. Matrix suppliers and contract research organizations (CROs) are actively implementing mitigation strategies to alleviate the current strain on the matrix supply chain and better prepare the industry for any future unexpected strains. To maintain ethical standards, these mitigation strategies include projecting matrix needs with suppliers at least 6 months in advance and writing or updating study protocols to allow for additional matrix draws from study subjects and/or re-purposing of subject matrix from one drug development program to another.

Bioanalytical challenges and unique considerations to support pharmacokinetic characterization of bispecific biotherapeutics.

Compared with conventional (monospecific) therapeutics, bispecific protein therapeutics present unique challenges for pharmacokinetic (PK) characterization - namely, the characterization of multiple functional domains as well as the consideration of biotransformation or interference by the formation of antitherapeutic antibodies against each functional domain. PK characterization is essential to the success of the overall drug development plan and for molecules with multiple binding domains; multiple bioanalytical methods may be needed to answer critical questions for each phase of drug development. The number of bispecific protein therapeutics entering drug development continues to increase, and therefore, a bioanalytical strategy for the PK characterization of bispecific molecules and study of their in vivo structure-function relationship is needed. This review presents case studies and a regulatory perspective.

The 10th GCC Closed Forum: rejected data, GCP in bioanalysis, extract stability, BAV, processed batch acceptance, matrix stability, critical reagents, ELN and data integrity and counteracting fraud.

The 10th Global CRO Council (GCC) Closed Forum was held in Orlando, FL, USA on 18 April 2016. In attendance were decision makers from international CRO member companies offering bioanalytical services. The objective of this meeting was for GCC members to meet and discuss scientific and regulatory issues specific to bioanalysis. The issues discussed at this closed forum included reporting data from failed method validation runs, GCP for clinical sample bioanalysis, extracted sample stability, biomarker assay validation, processed batch acceptance criteria, electronic laboratory notebooks and data integrity, Health Canada's Notice regarding replicates in matrix stability evaluations, critical reagents and regulatory approaches to counteract fraud. In order to obtain the pharma perspectives on some of these topics, the first joint CRO-Pharma Scientific Interchange Meeting was held on 12 November 2016, in Denver, Colorado, USA. The five topics discussed at this Interchange meeting were reporting data from failed method validation runs, GCP for clinical sample bioanalysis, extracted sample stability, processed batch acceptance criteria and electronic laboratory notebooks and data integrity. The conclusions from the discussions of these topics at both meetings are included in this report.

Evaluation of the blood stabilizers TransFix and Cyto-Chex BCT for low-cost CD4 T-cell methodologies.

TransFix(TM) and Cyto-Chex((R)) BCT (blood collection tube) reagents have been shown to maintain whole blood integrity for delayed immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. We evaluated the ability of these blood-stabilizing reagents to preserve HIV-seropositive blood for delayed CD4(+) T-cell quantification utilizing the Dynal((R)) Biotech T4 Quant Kit. TransFix was added to EDTA-anticoagulated whole blood and tested at a 1:10 dilution over 7 d using the Dynal (n = 21) manual method. Compared to baseline analysis, a significant decrease in mean CD4(+) counts was observed over time. Cyto-Chex BCT-preserved samples (n = 20) were tested for CD4(+) counts by Dynal over 7 d, with storage at varying temperatures: room temperature (21 degrees C), 37 degrees C, and 37 degrees C with intermittent storage at 42 degrees C. A significant decline in mean CD4(+) counts was observed in samples at all temperatures compared to baseline (p < 0.05). Increases in temperature to and above 37 degrees C resulted in a greater decline in mean CD4(+) counts over time. Our findings indicated that neither TransFix or Cyto-Chex BCT was a suitable blood stabilizer when used for delayed CD4(+) quantification with a low-cost manual CD4(+) bead-based method.

Stabilization of white blood cells and immunologic markers for extended analysis using flow cytometry.

We evaluated whole blood samples drawn from 25 healthy donors and 20 HIV-infected donors into K3EDTA and Cyto-Chex BCT blood collection tubes for CD4, CD8, and CD3 cell counts (HIV Panel). Samples collected in Cyto-Chex BCT were stored at room temperature and tested by 4-color flow cytometry at 6 h, 3 days, and 7 days after isolation for CD4, CD8, and CD3 absolute cell counts/microl and compared with samples collected in K3EDTA tubes and tested at 6 h. Regardless of donor type, the samples collected in Cyto-Chex BCT and tested on day 7 yielded results that were statistically indistinguishable (with correlation coefficients of 0.96 or greater) from samples collected in K3EDTA tubes and tested at 6 h. We conclude that whole blood samples collected in Cyto-Chex BCT are stabilized for their marker phenotype for at least 7 days after phlebotomy.

Human papillomavirus L1L2-E7 virus-like particles partially mature human dendritic cells and elicit E7-specific T-helper responses from patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer in vitro.

We evaluated the ability of autologous dendritic cells (DC) pulsed with recombinant human papillomavirus 16 L1L2-E7 virus-like particles (VLPs) to stimulate E7-specific CD4+ T-cell responses from normal donors and patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions or cervical carcinoma in vitro. Exposure to VLPs partially matured DCs, as evidenced by upregulated expression of costimulatory and major histocompatibility complex molecules and the reduced capacity of treated DCs to process exogenous antigens. However, VLP treatment failed to promote strong expression of the CD83 or CCR7 markers or to modulate interleukin-12p70 secretion, indicators of terminal DC maturation. Notably, both normal donor- and patient-derived DCs behaved similarly after exposure to VLPs. A single round of in vitro stimulation of CD4+ T cells with DCs exposed to L1L2-E7 VLPs promoted specific anti-E7 responses in the majority of donors. In particular, DCs exposed to VLPs effectively stimulated type 1 biased E7-specific CD4+ T-cell responses in patients with premalignant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I-III lesions, but type 2 or Treg biased responses in patients with cervical cancer. Given the high rate of CD4+ T-cell responses (14 [93%] of 15 patients) against DC-L1L2-E7 VLP stimulation, this vaccine modality could serve as a foundation for developing a general treatment option for patients with human papillomavirus 16-associated malignancies.

Disease-stage variance in functional CD4(+) T-cell responses against novel pan-human leukocyte antigen-D region presented human papillomavirus-16 E7 epitopes.

Given the anticipated clinical importance of helper and regulatory CD4(+) T cells reactive against human papillomavirus-16 E7 in the cervical carcinoma setting, we performed this study to identify novel E7-derived T helper (Th) epitopes and to characterize functional anti-E7 Th responses in normal donors and patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I-III or cervical cancer. Candidate pan-HLA-DR (D region) binding peptides were identified and synthesized based on results obtained using a predictive computer algorithm, then applied in short-term in vitro T-cell sensitization assays. Using IFN-gamma/IL-5 (interleukin 5) enzyme-linked immunospot assays as readouts for Th1-type and Th2-type CD4(+) T-cell responses, respectively, we identified three E7-derived T helper epitopes (E7(1-12), E7(48-62), and E7(62-75)), two of which are novel. Normal donor CD4(+) T cells failed to react against these E7 peptides, whereas patients with premalignant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I-III lesions displayed preferential Th1-type responses against all three E7 epitopes. Th1-type responses were still observed to the E7(48-62) but not to the E7(1-12) and E7(62-75) peptides in cancer patients, where these latter two epitopes evoked Th2-type responses. Notably all responders to the E7(1-12) and E7(62-75) peptides expressed the HLA-DR4 or -DR15 alleles, whereas all responders to the E7(48-62) peptide failed to express the HLA-DR4 allele. Our results are consistent with a model in which cervical cancer progression is linked to an undesirable Th1- to Th2-type shift in functional CD4(+) T cell responses to two novel E7-derived epitopes. These peptides may prove important in vaccines to promote and maintain protective Th1-type antihuman papillomavirus immunity and in the immune monitoring of treated patients harboring HPV-16(+) malignancies.