Malignant pleural mesothelioma: clinical experience and prognostic value of derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and PD-L1 expression.

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive tumor, with a poor prognosis. MPM needs to find prognostic factors of survival. We provided the management of patients with MPM and sought to determine whether pre-treatment levels of derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) as well as PD-L1 expression were reliable prognostic factors of survival. METHODS: We conducted a single-institution retrospective study, including all patients with MPM treated at La Paz University Hospital between December 2009 and March 2018. Baseline disease, demographics, clinical data, treatment characteristics and complete blood cell counts were collected. We examined dNLR at baseline and data for PD-L1 expression were analyzed in tumor cells by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: We included 25 patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 15.7 months (95% CI 11.3-20.0). 5 patients had a dNLR greater than 3 (20%). Patients with a dNLR greater than 3 had shorter median OS (8.5 months), than patients with a dNLR less than 3 (17.0 months), with statistically significant differences (p = 0.038). Ten patients (40%) had positive PD-L1 expression (≥ 1%). Patients with positive PD-L1 expression had shorter median OS (8.5 months) than patients with negative PDL1 expression (15.7 months), but without statistically significant association (p = 0.319). CONCLUSION: The survival data obtained in our sample are consistent with those previously reported. Pretreatment levels of dNLR greater than 3 and positive PD-L1 expression could be significant prognostic factors for poor survival in patients with MPM. Further and prospective studies are needed to explore this relationship and to derive definitive conclusions.

Mesothelin, Calretinin, and Megakaryocyte Potentiating Factor as Biomarkers of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

PURPOSE: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly lethal cancer caused by exposure to asbestos. Currently, the diagnosis is a challenge, carried out by means of invasive methods of limited sensitivity. This is a case-control study to evaluate the individual and combined performance of minimally invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis of MPM. METHOD: A study of 166 incident cases of MPM and 378 population controls of Mestizo-Mexican ethnicity was conducted. Mesothelin, calretinin, and megakaryocyte potentiating factor (MPF) were quantified in plasma by ELISA. The samples were collected from 2011 to 2016. RESULTS: Based on ROC analysis and a preset specificity of 95%, the combination of the three biomarkers reached an AUC of 0.944 and a sensitivity of 82% in men. In women, an AUC of 0.937 and a sensitivity of 87% were reached. In nonconditional logistic regression models, the adjusted ORs in men were 7.92 (95% CI 3.02-20.78) for mesothelin, 20.44 (95% CI 8.90-46.94) for calretinin, and 4.37 (95% CI 1.60-11.94) for MPF. The ORs for women were 28.89 (95% CI 7.32-113.99), 17.89 (95% CI 3.93-81.49), and 2.77 (95% CI 0.47-16.21), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating a combination of mesothelin, calretinin, and MPF, and demonstrating a sex effect for calretinin. The biomarker panel showed a good performance in a Mestizo-Mexican population, with high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of MPM.

Biomarkers for Predicting Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in a Mexican Population.

Background: Diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains a challenge, especially when resources in pathology are limited. The study aimed to evaluate cost-effective tumor markers to predict the probability of MPM in plasma samples in order to accelerate the diagnostic workup of the tissue of potential cases. Methods: We conducted a case-control study stratified by gender, which included 75 incident cases with MPM from three Mexican hospitals and 240 controls frequency-matched by age and year of blood drawing. Plasma samples were obtained to determine mesothelin, calretinin, and thrombomodulin using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). We estimated the performance of the markers based on the area under the curve (AUC) and predicted the probability of an MPM diagnosis of a potential case based on the marker concentrations. Results: Mesothelin and calretinin, but not thrombomodulin were significant predictors of a diagnosis of MPM with AUCs of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.94), and 0.51 (95% CI: 0.41-0.61) in males, respectively. For MPM diagnosis in men we estimated a true positive rate of 0.79 and a false positive rate of 0.11 for mesothelin. The corresponding figures for calretinin were 0.81 and 0.18, and for both markers combined 0.84 and 0.11, respectively. Conclusions: We developed prediction models based on plasma concentrations of mesothelin and calretinin to estimate the probability of an MPM diagnosis. Both markers showed a good performance and could be used to accelerate the diagnostic workup of tissue samples in Mexico.

Determinación de péptidos solubles relacionados a mesotelina para la detección precoz del mesotelioma maligno / Soluble mesothelin-related protein for malignant pleural mesothelioma screening

Introduction: Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) is a tumor of the mesothelial cells related to asbestos exposure. This malignancy is extremely aggressive, with poor response to different treatment modalities, and it has a mean survival of 8 months since diagnosis. With the introduction of new chemotherapeutic agents and trimodality protocols, five-year survival of 40 percent in initial stages has been reported. Serum detection of Soluble Mesothelin-related Protein (SMRP) could be used for screening of MPM. Using the MESOMARK® test, 53 percent of MPM patients had levels greater than 1,5 nM, while 99 percent of control patients had lower concentrations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of this test in Chile and determine its utility for screening ofMPM. Methods: Quantitative blind measurement of serum SMRP by MESOMARK® test. We studied 3 groups: 8 workers exposed to asbestos, 5 patients with diagnosed MPM and 14 age matched workers without known exposure to asbestos. Participants were informed of the study. Results: Mean +/- standard deviation SMRP levels in the control group was 0,53 +/- 0,4 nM, 0,89 +/- 0,46 nM in patients exposed to asbestos and 10,68 +/- 10,28 nM in MPMpatients. Differences between the groups were statistically significant (p = 0,02). In the MPM group, 3 patients were found to have SMRP levels greater than 1,5 nM (17,27 nM; SD 6,95) and 2 patients normal values (0,79 nM; SD 0,32). Using a cut-off value of 1,5 nM, sensitivity of the test was 60 percent and specificity was 100 percent. Conclusions: Detection of SMRP levels allowed to identify patients with MPM, three of whom had very high concentrations. The sensitivity and specificity found is similar to that previously reported. If our results are confirmed in greater studies, SMRP detection could be used for screening of MPM.

Resumen Introducción: El Mesotelioma Maligno (MM) es un tumor de las células mesoteliales relacionado a la exposición a asbesto, altamente agresivo, con pobre respuesta al tratamiento y con una sobrevida promedio de 8 meses después del diagnóstico. Sin embargo, nuevos agentes quimioterapéuticos y protocolos de terapia trimodal han logrado sobrevidas de hasta 40 por ciento en etapas iniciales. La detección en sangre periférica de Péptidos Solubles Relacionados a Mesotelina (SMRP) podría ser útil para el diagnóstico precoz de MM. Utilizando el test MESOMARK® para la determinación de SMRP, 53 por ciento de los pacientes con MM tenían valores mayores a 1,5 nM mientras que 99 por ciento de los controles mostraron valores inferiores. El objetivo del presente trabajo es evaluar la implementación de este test en Chile y determinar su utilidad para el diagnóstico precoz en MM. Métodos: Medición cuantitativa de SMRP en suero humano por test MESOMARK®. Se realizaron mediciones en forma ciega a 8 trabajadores con exposición a asbesto, a 5 pacientes con MMy a 14 voluntarios sin exposición. Todos los participantes fueron informados del estudio. Resultados: El promedio +/- desviación estándar de SMRP en el grupo control fue de 0,53 +/- 0,4 nM, de 0,89 +/- 0,46 nM en los expuestos sin MMy de 10,68 +/- 10,28 nM en el grupo con MM; encontrándose una diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre los valores de estos tres grupos (p = 0,02). En el grupo con MM, 3 pacientes tuvieron concentraciones mucho mayores a 1,5 nM (17,27 nM; DS 6,95) y 2 valores normales (0,79 nM; DS 0,32). Utilizando un valor de 1,5 nM como punto de corte, la sensibilidad fue de 60 por ciento y la especificidad de 100 por ciento. Conclusiones: La medición de SMRP permitió diferenciar a los pacientes con MM, presentando 3 de ellos concentraciones muy elevadas. La sensibilidad y especificidad encontrada es similar con datos previamente reportados. De confirmarse estos resultados en estudios con mayor ...