Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine Is an Effective Ambulatory Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis Refractory to JAK2 Inhibitor Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes are dismal for patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who are no longer responsive to JAK2 inhibitors (JAKi) and/or have increasing blast cell numbers. Although prior reports have suggested the benefits of intravenous decitabine (DAC) combined with ruxolitinib for patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) accelerated/blast phase (AP/BP), decitabine-cedazuridine (DEC-C), an oral fixed-dose combination providing equivalent pharmacokinetic exposure, has not been evaluated in MF. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 14 patients with high-risk MF refractory to ruxolitinib or MPN-AP (10-19% blasts) treated with DEC-C +/- JAKi at Mount Sinai Hospital from 2021 to 2024. RESULTS: The cohort was elderly (median age,76 years) and almost uniformly possessed high risk mutations with 13 of the 14 patients progressing on JAKi therapy. With a median follow-up of 9.4 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 29 months for the entire cohort. Median OS was 10.8 months for MPN-AP and was not reached for ruxolitinib refractory MF patients. All patients (n = 9) receiving > 4 cycles of DEC-C had clinical benefit exemplified by a reduction in blast cell numbers, spleen size, and lack of progression to MPN-BP (78%). Furthermore, 3/14 patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant. Myelosuppression was a common adverse event which was managed by reducing the number of days of administration of DEC-C from 5 to 3 per cycle. CONCLUSIONS: This report demonstrates the feasibility, tolerability, and clinical benefit of an exclusively ambulatory regimen for high-risk, elderly patients with advanced MF which warrants further evaluation in a prospective clinical trial.

Recovery of chronic motor neuropathy due to acute intermittent porphyria after givosiran treatment in a young boy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: We describe the first case of a pediatric patient with acute intermittent porphyria and severe chronic porphyric neuropathy treated with givosiran, a small-interfering RNA that drastically decreases delta-aminolevulinic acid production and reduces porphyric attacks' recurrence. CASE REPORT: A 12-year-old male patient with refractory acute intermittent porphyria and severe porphyric neuropathy was followed prospectively for 12 months after givosiran initiation (subcutaneous, 2.5 mg/kg monthly). Serial neurological, structural, and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations were performed, including clinical scales and neurophysiological tests. Delta-aminolevulinic acid urinary levels dropped drastically during treatment. In parallel, all the administered neurological rating scales and neurophysiological assessments showed improvement in all domains. Moreover, an improvement in central motor conduction parameters and resting-state functional connectivity in the sensory-motor network was noticed. At the end of the follow-up, the patient could walk unaided after using a wheelchair for 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: A clear beneficial effect of givosiran was demonstrated in our patient with both clinical and peripheral nerve neurophysiologic outcome measures. Moreover, we first reported a potential role of givosiran in recovering central motor network impairment in acute intermittent porphyria (AIP), which was previously unknown. This study provides Class IV evidence that givosiran improves chronic porphyric neuropathy.

Clinical activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of oral hypomethylating agents for myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemia: A multidisciplinary review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles, disease setting, dosing, and safety of oral and parenteral hypomethylating agents (HMAs) for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and to provide a multidisciplinary perspective on treatment selection and educational needs relating to HMA use. DATA SOURCES: Clinical and real-world data for parenteral decitabine and azacitidine and two oral HMAs: decitabine-cedazuridine (DEC-C) for MDS and azacitidine (CC-486) for AML maintenance therapy. DATA SUMMARY: Differences in the PK-PD profiles of oral and parenteral HMA formulations have implications for their potential toxicities and planned use. Oral DEC-C (decitabine 35 mg and cedazuridine 100 mg) has demonstrated equivalent systemic area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) exposure to a 5-day regimen of intravenous (IV) decitabine 20 mg/m2 and showed no significant difference in PD. The AUC equivalence of oral DEC-C and IV decitabine means that these regimens can be treated interchangeably (but must not be substituted within a cycle). Oral azacitidine has a distinct PK-PD profile versus IV or subcutaneous azacitidine, and the formulations are not bioequivalent or interchangeable owing to differences in plasma time-course kinetics and exposures. Clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate oral HMA combinations and novel oral HMAs, such as NTX-301 and ASTX030. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with oral HMAs has the potential to improve quality of life, treatment adherence, and disease outcomes versus parenteral HMAs. Better education of multidisciplinary teams on the factors affecting HMA treatment selection may help to improve treatment outcomes in patients with MDS or AML.

Phase 2/3 Trial of Molnupiravir for Treatment of Covid-19 in Nonhospitalized Adults.

BACKGROUND: Safe and effective oral treatments are needed to improve clinical outcomes for nonhospitalized patients with Covid-19. Molnupiravir is an orally administered, small-molecule ribonucleoside prodrug shown to inhibit replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in vitro and in animal models. METHODS: MOVe-OUT is an ongoing, phase 2/3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study evaluating the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of molnupiravir in nonhospitalized adults. In the phase 2 component, participants had mild or moderate, laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 with sign/symptom onset up to (and including) 7 days before randomization. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to receive 200, 400, or 800 mg of molnupiravir or placebo twice daily for 5 days, stratified by time since sign/symptom onset and by being at increased risk for severe illness from Covid-19. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of participants who were hospitalized and/or died through day 29. RESULTS: The phase 2 component randomly assigned 302 participants to treatment; baseline characteristics were comparable across treatment groups. Molnupiravir had no apparent dose-related effect on adverse events, and no clinically meaningful abnormalities in laboratory test results were observed in relation to dose or treatment. Eleven participants were hospitalized or died through day 29. Of 225 participants in the combined molnupiravir group, 7 (3.1%) were hospitalized or died, compared with 4 of 74 participants (5.4%) in the placebo group. Subgroup analyses suggested lower incidences of hospitalization and/or death in the molnupiravir versus placebo groups in participants older than 60 years of age, those with increased risk for severe illness, those with symptom onset up to (and including) 5 days before randomization, and those with both symptom onset up to (and including) 5 days before randomization and increased risk for severe illness. CONCLUSIONS: These interim study results support further evaluation of molnupiravir as a potential treatment to reduce hospitalizations and/or death in nonhospitalized patients with Covid-19. (Funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04575597.)

Oral hypomethylating agents: beyond convenience in MDS.

Oral hypomethylating agents (HMAs) represent a substantial potential boon for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who have previously required between 5 and 7 visits per month to an infusion clinic to receive therapy. For patients who respond to treatment, ongoing monthly maintenance visits represent a considerable burden to quality of life, and for those who are early in therapy, these sequential visits may tax transportation and financial resources that would be optimally distributed over the treatment cycle to facilitate transfusion support. The availability of oral HMAs may support the optimal application of these agents by contributing to adherence and lessening the burden of therapy, potentially encouraging patients to stay on longer-term treatment. Distinct pharmacokinetic profiles for the recently approved oral HMAs (oral azacitidine and decitabine-cedazuridine) result in differential toxicity profiles and have prompted their clinical trial development in lower- and higher-risk MDS, respectively.

The path to approval for oral hypomethylating agents in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.

Two oral hypomethylating agents, oral azacitidine (CC-486) and decitabine/cedazuridine (ASTX727), have recently entered the clinical domain. CC-486 has been shown to improve overall survival as maintenance therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission, whereas the combination of decitabine with cedazuridine, a cytidine deaminase inhibitor, is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with intermediate-1, or higher, International Prognostic Scoring System risk. This article briefly summarizes the clinical development of both drugs, the pivotal studies that led to their approval and some of the issues faced in extending the use of these drugs to other indications.

Lay abstract One of the key challenges in treating acute myeloid leukemia is to prevent relapse after remission has been achieved. This means that developing an effective maintenance treatment is very important. Maintenance treatment is given for a prolonged period and so it needs to be easy to give and well tolerated. Oral azacitidine is an example of this type of treatment and is the first drug that has been shown to improve survival as maintenance therapy for acute myeloid leukemia patients. This article describes the key studies that led to the approval of this important therapy.

Role of cedazuridine/decitabine in the management of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders. Complex disease biology has posed significant challenge to the development of novel therapeutics. Despite myriad clinical trials, none have been superior to azacitidine and decitabine (DEC) therapy. These therapies present a substantial burden for patients with 5 and 7 days of parenteral treatment in an infusion clinic. To overcome this limitation, a fixed drug combination of oral DEC-cedazuridine (C-DEC), a cytidine deaminase inhibitor with documented safety profile was developed. This drug was recently approved by the US FDA, Australian TGA and Health Canada for newly diagnosed or previously treated intermediate or high risk by international prognostic scoring system, MDS and CMML. In this review, we detail the pharmacokinetic and clinical activity of C-DEC in the management of MDS and CMML.

Lay abstract Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia are rare types of blood cancers. When treatment for these conditions is required, azacitidine or decitabine are the most commonly used chemotherapies. These medications are administered into blood through a medical port. Since these cancers are common in elderly, management of the port and frequent visits to infusion centers for treatment leads to noncompliance with treatment plan. With addition of a new compound by name cedazuridine to decitabine, now a new US FDA-approved medication, INQOVI^® (decitabine and cedazuridine) can be taken by mouth at home. This new treatment has shown to be equally effective with a similar safety profile to decitabine. In this review article, we describe the investigational details and drug development of the oral medication, INQOVI^®.

Enhancement of Ketone Supplements-Evoked Effect on Absence Epileptic Activity by Co-Administration of Uridine in Wistar Albino Glaxo Rijswijk Rats.

Both uridine and exogenous ketone supplements decreased the number of spike-wave discharges (SWDs) in a rat model of human absence epilepsy Wistar Albino Glaxo/Rijswijk (WAG/Rij) rats. It has been suggested that alleviating influence of both uridine and ketone supplements on absence epileptic activity may be modulated by A1 type adenosine receptors (A1Rs). The first aim was to determine whether intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of a specific A1R antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX; 0.2 mg/kg) and a selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist (7-(2-phenylethyl)-5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo [1,5-c]pyrimidine) (SCH 58261; 0.5 mg/kg) have a modulatory influence on i.p. 1000 mg/kg uridine-evoked effects on SWD number in WAG/Rij rats. The second aim was to assess efficacy of a sub-effective dose of uridine (i.p. 250 mg/kg) combined with beta-hydroxybutyrate salt + medium chain triglyceride (KSMCT; 2.5 g/kg, gavage) on absence epilepsy. DPCPX completely abolished the i.p. 1000 mg/kg uridine-evoked alleviating effect on SWD number whereas SCH 58261 was ineffective, confirming the A1R mechanism. Moreover, the sub-effective dose of uridine markedly enhanced the effect of KSMCT (2.5 g/kg, gavage) on absence epileptic activity. These results demonstrate the anti-epilepsy benefits of co-administrating uridine and exogenous ketone supplements as a means to treat absence epilepsy.

Uridine-responsive epileptic encephalopathy due to inherited variants in CAD: A Tale of Two Siblings.

We report two siblings with intractable epilepsy, developmental regression, and progressive cerebellar atrophy due to biallelic variants in the gene CAD. For the affected girl, uridine started at age 5 resulted in dramatic improvements in seizure control and development, cessation of cerebellar atrophy, and resolution of hematological abnormalities. Her older brother had a more severe course and only modest response to uridine started at 14 years old. Treatment of this progressive condition via uridine supplementation provides an example of precision diagnosis and treatment using clear outcome measures and biomarkers to monitor efficacy.

Oral cedazuridine/decitabine for MDS and CMML: a phase 2 pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic randomized crossover study.

This phase 2 study was designed to compare systemic decitabine exposure, demethylation activity, and safety in the first 2 cycles with cedazuridine 100 mg/decitabine 35 mg vs standard decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV. Adults with International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate-1/2- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) were randomized 1:1 to receive oral cedazuridine/decitabine or IV decitabine in cycle 1, followed by crossover to the other treatment in cycle 2. All patients received oral cedazuridine/decitabine in subsequent cycles. Cedazuridine and decitabine were given initially as separate capsules in a dose-confirmation stage and then as a single fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet. Primary end points: mean decitabine systemic exposure (geometric least-squares mean [LSM]) of oral/IV 5-day area under curve from time 0 to last measurable concentration (AUClast), percentage long interspersed nuclear element 1 (LINE-1) DNA demethylation for oral cedazuridine/decitabine vs IV decitabine, and clinical response. Eighty patients were randomized and treated. Oral/IV ratios of geometric LSM 5-day AUClast (80% confidence interval) were 93.5% (82.1-106.5) and 97.6% (80.5-118.3) for the dose-confirmation and FDC stages, respectively. Differences in mean %LINE-1 demethylation between oral and IV were ≤1%. Clinical responses were observed in 48 patients (60%), including 17 (21%) with complete response. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events regardless of causality were neutropenia (46%), thrombocytopenia (38%), and febrile neutropenia (29%). Oral cedazuridine/decitabine (100/35 mg) produced similar systemic decitabine exposure, DNA demethylation, and safety vs decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV in the first 2 cycles, with similar efficacy. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02103478.

JNJ-4178 (adafosbuvir, odalasvir, and simeprevir) in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 2 infection with or without compensated cirrhosis: the Phase IIa OMEGA-3 study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of three direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents (adafosbuvir [also known as AL-335], odalasvir, and simeprevir) were investigated in DAA treatment-naïve Japanese patients with genotype (GT)1 or GT2 chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, with or without compensated cirrhosis. METHODS: In this Phase IIa, open-label, multicenter study-OMEGA-3 (NCT02993250)-patients received JNJ-4178 (adafosbuvir 800 mg once daily [QD], odalasvir 25 mg QD, and simeprevir 75 mg QD) for 8 (non-cirrhotic patients; Cohort 1) or 12 (cirrhotic patients; Cohort 2) weeks. Patients were followed-up to 24 weeks following the end of treatment (EOT). The primary endpoint was safety, including adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Overall, 33 patients were enrolled into Cohort 1 (N = 22) or 2 (N = 11) and received combined treatment with JNJ-4178. During the treatment and follow-up phases, a higher percentage of patients in Cohort 2 (81.8%) experienced AEs compared with Cohort 1 (68.2%), but the incidence of treatment-related AEs was similar. Most AEs were mild-to-moderate in severity and no patients discontinued due to an AE. There was one serious AE (cataract) in a patient in Cohort 2, which was not considered related to treatment. All patients achieved sustained virologic response 12 weeks after EOT (SVR12). No incidences of viral relapse were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In HCV GT1- and GT2-infected Japanese patients, treatment with JNJ-4178 was well tolerated and resulted in 100% of patients achieving SVR12.

Real-time comprehensive toxicology testing in the clinical management of accidental pediatric capecitabine ingestion.

INTRODUCTION: Capecitabine is an orally bioavailable prodrug of the chemotherapeutic agent, fluorouracil. Fluorouracil is converted to several active metabolites that induce a cytotoxic effect. Capecitabine toxicity can be life-threatening with a delayed presentation from ingestion. An oral antidote, uridine triacetate, exists but requires the administration of 20 total doses over a course of five days. CASE REPORT: In this report, we describe a case where timely coordination with a clinical toxicology laboratory was utilized to drive clinical decision making and management. Two children were brought to the emergency department shortly after suspected capecitabine ingestion. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Patients were admitted to the hospital and started on uridine triacetate. Real-time comprehensive toxicology testing of the children's blood was used to rule out capecitabine toxicity and prevent several unnecessary days of hospitalization and doses of antidote. Patients were discharged safely. DISCUSSION: Real-time comprehensive toxicology testing on a patient's blood may be a valuable resource in ruling out or confirming toxic exposure in accidental pediatric ingestion of chemotherapeutic agents like capecitabine when performed in a timely manner.

Fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity and DPD deficiency.. A case report of early onset, lethal capecitabine-induced toxicity and mini review of the literature. Uridine triacetate: Efficacy and safety as an antidote. Is it accessible outside USA?

Fluoropyrimidine-based regimens are among the most commonly used chemotherapy combinations for the treatment of solid tumors. Several genetic polymorphisms that are implicated with fluoropyrimidine anabolism and catabolism have been associated with the development of life-threatening toxicities. Uridine triacetate is an FDA-approved antidote for 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine overdose and early-onset, life-threatening toxicity within 96 h of last chemotherapy dose. To date, it is not accessible for Greek patients as per the current summary of product characteristic's time restrictions. We report and discuss the course and outcome of capecitabine toxicity in a 66-year-old female colorectal cancer patient with heterozygous dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. This paper highlights the difficulty in timely access of this lifesaving medication for Greek and possibly other European patients.

Uridine dynamic administration affects circadian variations in lipid metabolisms in the liver of high-fat-diet-fed mice.

Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in the liver has been reported to follow a certain circadian rhythm. Moreover, uridine supplementation also affected glucose and lipid homeostasis in previous studies; however, the mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate whether uridine supplementation at an appropriate time during the day can alleviate obesity in mice. C57BL/6J mice were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 24 per group) with different diets for 2 weeks: (1) HFD group, fed a diet containing 60% fat calories; (2) DUR group, fed with HFD supplemented with 400 mg/kg uridine during zeitgeber time (ZT0) 0 - zeitgeber time 12 ZT12; (3) NUR group, fed HFD supplemented with 400 mg/kg uridine during ZT12 - ZT24. Starting at ZT4, liver samples were collected every 6 h for 24 h. Results showed that uridine supplementation, independent of the time of administration during the day, significantly reduced body weight gain (P < .05). Furthermore, liver weight and ratio showed a strong time dependence (P < .001). Additionally, oral administration of uridine during daytime or nighttime changed the expression levels of genes involved in the metabolism of uridine (SLC29A1, UMPS, UPP, UGT1A1, and DHODH; P < .05). Furthermore, uridine affected the levels of 10 fatty acids, lipid and glucose gene (FASN, LCAT, PC, PEPCK, GSK3ß, and GLUT2; P < .05) depending on the timing of administration (P < .05). In conclusion, oral supplementation with uridine affected the diurnal variations in liver nucleotide and lipid metabolism, which contributed to the weight loss in HFD-fed mice.

Efficacy and safety of a two-drug direct-acting antiviral agent regimen ruzasvir 180 mg and uprifosbuvir 450 mg for 12 weeks in adults with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6.

Ruzasvir (MK-8408, an NS5A inhibitor) and uprifosbuvir (MK-3682, a nonstructural protein 5B nucleotide inhibitor) are highly potent direct-acting antiviral agents for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. A phase III clinical trial evaluating the two-drug combination of ruzasvir 60 mg plus uprifosbuvir 450 mg suggested suboptimal efficacy in certain HCV genotypes (C-BREEZE 1; NCT02759315). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruzasvir in combination with uprifosbuvir administered at a higher dose than that assessed in the earlier study (C-BREEZE 2: NCT02956629/Merck protocol PN041). Treatment-naïve or interferon (with or without ribavirin)-experienced participants with or without compensated cirrhosis were enrolled. All participants received ruzasvir 180 mg plus uprifosbuvir 450 mg once daily for 12 weeks. The primary objectives were the proportion of participants with HCV RNA <15 lU/mL at 12 weeks after the end of study therapy (SVR12), and safety and tolerability of the study drug. Overall, 282 participants were enrolled. SVR12 (n/N) was 91.3% (42/46) in participants infected with HCV genotype (GT) 1a; GT1b, 96.7% (29/30); GT2, 91.5% (43/47); GT3, 73.8% (45/61); GT4, 98.2% (55/56); GT5, 100.0% (18/18); and GT6, 90.9% (20/22). Adverse events (AEs) were reported by 61.3% of participants; drug-related AEs were reported by 33.3%. The most frequent (≥5% of participants) drug-related AEs in all participants were fatigue (7.8%) and headache (7.4%). In conclusion, the two-drug combination of ruzasvir 180 mg plus uprifosbuvir 450 mg for 12 weeks was highly effective and well tolerated in participants infected with HCV GT1, GT2, GT4, GT5 and GT6, with a lower efficacy in GT3-infected persons.

Evaluation of BBB permeable nucleolipid (NLDPU): A di-C15-ketalised palmitone appended uridine as neuro-tracer for SPECT.

Despite being in routine for onco-diagnostics for years, the applicability of nucleosidic molecular imaging probes is severely restricted in neurological applications due to their low permeability across blood-brain-barrier (BBB). For extending nucleoside tracers utility for neuro-onco early diagnostics, suitable modification which enhances their BBB permeation needs investigation. Among various modifications, lipidization of nucleosides has been reported to enhance cellular permeability. Extending the concept, the aim was to exemplify the possibility of lipidized nucleosides as potential brain tracer with capability to cross intact BBB and evaluate as metal based neuro-imaging SPECT agent. Uridine based non-lipidic (NSDAU) and di-C15-ketal appended lipidic (NLDPU) ligands were conjugated to chelator, DTPA (DTPA-NSDAU and DTPA-NLDPU) using multi-step chemistry. The ligands were evaluated in parallel for comparative physical and biological parameters. Additionally, effects of enhanced lipophilicity on UV-absorption, acid strength, fluorescence and non-specific protein binding were evaluated. Fluorescence quenching of BSA indicated appreciable interaction of DTPA-NLDPU with protein only above 10 mM without inducing conformational changes. In addition, DTPA-NLDPU was found to be haematocompatible and cytocompatible with low dose-dependent toxicity in HEK-cells. The chelator DTPA was used for 99mTc-complexation for SPECT imaging. Optimized 99mTc-radiolabeling parameters resulted in quantitative (≥97%) labeling with good stability parameters in in-vitro serum and cysteine challenge studies. We demonstrate that the nucleolipid radiotracer (99mTc-DTPA-NLDPU) was successfully able to permeate the BBB with brain uptake of 0.2% ID/g in normal mice as compared to 0.06% ID/g uptake of 99mTc-DTPA-NSDAU at 5 min. Blood kinetics indicate biphasic profile and t1/2(distribution) 46 min for 99mTc-DTPA-NLDPU. The preferential accumulation of 99mTc-DTPA-NLDPU in brain tumor intracranial xenograft indicate the targeting capability of the nucleoside. We conclude that as first-of-its-kind, this work presents the potential of the biocompatible nucleolipidic system for brain targeting and early diagnostics.

Clinical update on hypomethylating agents.

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs), azacitidine and decitabine, are standards of care in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and in acute myeloid leukemia patients ineligible for intensive therapy. Over the last 10 years, research efforts have sought to better understand their mechanism of action, both at the molecular and cellular level. These efforts have yet to robustly identify biomarkers for these agents. The clinical activity of HMAs in myeloid neoplasms has been firmly established now but still remains of limited magnitude. Besides optimized use at different stages of the disease, most of the expected clinical progress with HMAs will come from the development of second-generation compounds orally available and/or with improved pharmacokinetics, and from the search, so far mostly empirical, of HMA-based synergistic drug combinations.

An oral fixed-dose combination of decitabine and cedazuridine in myelodysplastic syndromes: a multicentre, open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1 study.

BACKGROUND: Decitabine, a DNA methyltransferase 1 inhibitor or DNA hypomethylating compound, is not readily orally bioavailable because of rapid clearance by cytidine deaminase (CDA) in the gut and liver. This dose-escalation study, guided by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic observations, evaluated whether simultaneous oral administration with the novel CDA inhibitor cedazuridine increases decitabine bioavailability for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. METHODS: In this phase 1 study, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. Eligible patients were assigned to cohorts to receive escalating oral doses of decitabine and cedazuridine. The starting dose was decitabine 20 mg and cedazuridine 40 mg. Treatment cycles lasted 28 days, with 5 days of drug administration. In cycle 1, each patient received a cohort-defined dose of oral decitabine on day -3, a 1-h intravenous infusion of decitabine 20 mg/m2 on day 1, and cohort-defined doses of oral decitabine plus cedazuridine on days 2-5. In cycles 2 and beyond, the oral decitabine and cedazuridine were given on days 1-5. The dose of cedazuridine was escalated first and decitabine was escalated once CDA inhibition by cedazuridine approached the maximum effect. The drug dose was escalated if mean decitabine area under the curve (AUC) of the oral drug was less than 90% of that for intravenous decitabine in the cohort and if no dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as a grade 3 or greater non-haematologic toxicity or grade 4 haematologic toxicity lasting more than 14 days and unrelated to the underlying disease. Once the decitabine AUC target range set as the primary endpoint, and established with intravenous decitabine, was reached at a dose deemed to be safe, the cohort that most closely approximated intravenous decitabine exposure was expanded to 18 evaluable patients. The primary objectives were to assess the safety of decitabine plus cedazuridine, and to determine the dose of each drug needed to achieve a mean AUC for decitabine exposure similar to that for intravenous decitabine exposure. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02103478. FINDINGS: Between Oct 28, 2014, and Nov 13, 2015, we enrolled 44 eligible patients (of 75 screened) with previously treated or newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia; 43 of the enrolled patients were evaluable. Participants were treated in five cohorts: cohorts 1-4 included six evaluable patients each; cohort 5 included 19 patients in a 13-patient expansion. Dose-dependent increases in decitabine AUC and peak plasma concentration occurred with each cohort dose escalation. There was no evident increase in toxicity compared with that reported for intravenous decitabine. Decitabine 30 mg and 40 mg plus cedazuridine 100 mg produced mean day-5 decitabine AUCs (146 ng × h/mL for decitabine 30 mg, and 221 ng × h/mL for decitabine 40 mg) closest to the mean intravenous-decitabine AUC (164 ng × h/mL). The most common grade 3 or more adverse events were thrombocytopenia (18 [41%] of 44 patients), neutropenia (13 [30%]), anaemia (11 [25%]), leukopenia (seven [16%]), febrile neutropenia (seven [16%]), and pneumonia (seven [16%]). Four (9%) patients died because of adverse events, none of which was considered drug related, and three (7%) patients died more than 30 days after discontinuing treatment because of progressive disease (two [5%]) and respiratory failure (one [2%]). INTERPRETATION: Oral decitabine plus cedazuridine emulated the pharmacokinetics of intravenous decitabine, with a similar safety profile and dose-dependent demethylation. Clinical responses were similar to intravenous decitabine treatment for 5 days. Further study of decitabine plus cedazuridine as an alternative to parenteral therapy or in combination with other new oral agents for myeloid disorders is warranted. FUNDING: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.