Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation active surveillance prostate cancer cohort: a characterisation of a prostate cancer active surveillance database.

BACKGROUND: The routine clinical use of serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) testing has allowed earlier detection of low-grade prostate cancer (PCa) with more favourable characteristics, leading to increased acceptance of management by active surveillance (AS). AS aims to avoid over treatment in men with low and intermediate-risk PCa and multiple governing bodies have described several AS protocols. This study provides a descriptive profile of the Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT) AS cohort as a platform for future research in AS pathways in PCa. METHODS: Demographic and baseline characteristics were retrospectively collected in a database for patients at the GSTT AS clinic with prospective collection of follow-up data from 2012. Seven hundred eighty-eight men being monitored at GSTT with histologically confirmed intermediate-risk PCa, at least 1 follow-up appointment and diagnostic characteristics consistent with AS criteria were included in the profile. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox proportion hazards regression models were used to characterize the cohort. DISCUSSION: A relatively large proportion of the cohort includes men of African/Afro-Caribbean descent (22%). More frequent use of magnetic resonance imaging and trans-perineal biopsies at diagnosis was observed among patients diagnosed after 2012. Those who underwent trans-rectal ultrasound diagnostic biopsy received their first surveillance biopsy 20 months earlier than those who underwent trans-perineal diagnostic biopsy. At 3 years, 76.1% men remained treatment free. Predictors of treatment progression included Gleason score 3 + 4 (Hazard ratio (HR): 2.41, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.79-3.26) and more than 2 positive cores taken at biopsy (HR: 2.65, CI: 1.94-3.62). A decreased risk of progressing to treatment was seen among men diagnosed after 2012 (HR: 0.72, CI: 0.53-0.98). CONCLUSION: An organised biopsy surveillance approach, via two different AS pathways according to the patient's diagnostic method, can be seen within the GSTT cohort. Risk of patients progressing to treatment has decreased in the period since 2012 compared with the prior period with more than half of the cohort remaining treatment free at 5 years, highlighting that the fundamental aims of AS at GSTT are being met. Thus, this cohort is a good resource to investigate the AS treatment pathway.

Actualización y optimización de la vigilancia activa en cáncer de próstata en 2021 / Update and optimization of active surveillance in prostate cancer in 2021

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Dentro del cambio de paradigma de la última década en el manejo del cáncer de próstata (CaP), quizás el hecho más relevante haya sido la irrupción de la vigilancia activa (VA) como estrategia obligada en el de bajo riesgo. Realizamos una revisión crítica de las mejoras clínicas, anatomopatológicas y radiológicas que permiten optimizar la VA en 2021. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Revisión crítica narrativa de la literatura en los temas de mejora y en los aspectos controvertidos de la VA. RESULTADOS: El buen uso de los criterios clásicos, optimizados por una mejor técnica de biopsia y cálculo del volumen prostático gracias a la resonancia magnética multiparamétrica (RMmp), permite una mejor selección de pacientes para VA. No se debe restringir la VA en menores de 60 años y se debe seleccionar qué pacientes con CaP de riesgo intermedio pueden incluirse en VA. Las biopsias siguen siendo necesarias en el seguimiento, pero este se puede individualizar según patrones de riesgo. El patólogo ha de reseñar el patrón cribiforme o intraductal en las biopsias para no ser incluidos en VA, al igual que los pacientes con alteraciones en los genes de reparación del ADN. CONCLUSIONES: Se debe seguir optimizando las indicaciones controvertidas, como la inclusión de pacientes de grupo intermedio o el paso a tratamiento activo por progresión exclusiva en volumen tumoral. Es posible que el concurso futuro de biomarcadores tisulares, el refinamiento de parámetros objetivos de la RMmp y la validación de calculadoras cinéticas del PSA puedan subestratificar grupos de riesgo

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Within the paradigm shift of the last decade in the management of prostate cancer (PCa), perhaps the most relevant event has been the emergence of active surveillance (AS) as a mandatory strategy in low-risk disease. We carry out a critical review of the clinical, pathological and radiological improvements that allow optimizing AS in 2021. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Critical narrative review of the literature on improvement issues and controversial aspects of AS. RESULTS: Adequate use of traditional criteria, optimized by enhanced biopsy and calculation of the prostate volume technique thanks to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) allow a better selection of patients for AS. This management should not be limited to patients under 60years of age, and patients with intermediate-risk PCa should be carefully selected to be included. Biopsies are still required in the follow-up, which can be personalized according to risk patterns. The pathologist must identify the cribriform or intraductal histology on biopsies in order to exclude these patients from AS, in the same way as with patients with alterations in DNA repair genes. CONCLUSIONS: Controversial indications such as the inclusion of patients from intermediate-risk groups, or the transition to active treatment due to exclusive progression in tumor volume, should be further optimized. It is possible that the future competition of tissue biomarkers, the refinement of objective parameters of mpMRI and the validation of PSA kinetics calculators may sub-stratify risk groups

Appendectomy Versus Observation for Appendicitis in Neutropenic Children With Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of neutropenic appendicitis (NA) in children undergoing cancer therapy remains undefined. Management strategies include upfront appendectomy or initial nonoperative management. We aimed to characterize the effect of management strategy on complications and length of stay (LOS) and describe implications for chemotherapy delay or alteration. METHODS: Sites from the Pediatric Surgery Oncology Research Collaborative performed a retrospective review of children with NA over a 6-year period. RESULTS: Sixty-six children, with a median age of 11 years (range 1-17), were identified with NA while undergoing cancer treatment. The most common cancer diagnoses were leukemia (62%) and brain tumor (12%). Upfront appendectomy was performed in 41% of patients; the remainder had initial nonoperative management. Rates of abscess or perforation at diagnosis were equivalent in the groups (30% vs 24%; P = .23). Of patients who had initial nonoperative management, 46% (17 of 37) underwent delayed appendectomy during the same hospitalization. Delayed appendectomy was due to failure of initial nonoperative management in 65% (n = 11) and count recovery in 35% (n = 6). Cancer therapy was delayed in 35% (n = 23). Initial nonoperative management was associated with a delay in cancer treatment (46% vs. 22%, P = .05) and longer LOS (29 vs 12 days; P = .01). Patients who had initial nonoperative management and delayed appendectomy had a higher rate of postoperative complications (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric patients with NA from oncologic treatment, upfront appendectomy resulted in lower complication rates, reduced LOS, and fewer alterations in chemotherapy regimens compared to initial nonoperative management.

Observation versus radiotherapy with or without temozolomide in postoperative WHO grade II high-risk low-grade glioma: a retrospective cohort study.

The optimal adjuvant treatment of high-risk low-grade glioma (LGG) is controversial. We performed this retrospective cohort study to compare three treatments including observation, radiotherapy (RT) alone, and radiotherapy combined with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy (STUPP regimen) in patients with high-risk LGG. Patients with high-risk (age > 40 or undergoing subtotal resection or biopsy) LGG treated with observation or radiotherapy alone or STUPP regimen after operation were retrospectively analyzed. Survival rates were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method; the log-rank test was applied to compare differences between groups. A total of 250 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up for living people was 70 months. Overall, patients who received radiotherapy with or without temozolomide had better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when compared with observation (median PFS: observation, 59 months; RT, 82 months; STUPP, not reached; median OS: observation, 96 months; RT, not reached; STUPP, not reached), whereas STUPP regimen did not further prolong PFS or OS than RT alone (PFS, P = 0.203; OS, P = 0.146). In oligodendroglioma (IDH mutant and 1p/19q codeleted) subtype, only STUPP regimen brought longer PFS when compared with observation (P = 0.008). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (P < 0.001) and nausea or vomiting (P = 0.004) was higher in the STUPP group than the figure for the RT alone group. PFS and OS were similarly improved in patients with high-risk LGG receiving RT alone or STUPP regimen. However, only STUPP regimen was able to bring better PFS for oligodendroglioma (IDH mutant and 1p/19q codeleted) subgroup. Longer follow-up time is needed to determine an association with treatment effect in different histological and molecular subgroups.

Trends in the use of active surveillance and treatments in Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The treatment for men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer has changed over time given the increased attention to the harms associated with over-diagnosis and the development of protocols for active surveillance. METHODS: We examined trends in the treatment of men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2004 and 2015, using the most recently available data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER)-Medicare. Patients were stratified by Gleason score, age, and race groups. RESULTS: The use of active surveillance increased from 22% in 2004-2005 to 50% in 2014-2015 for patients with a Gleason score of 6 or below and increased from 9% in 2004-2005 to 13% in 2014-2015 for patients with a Gleason score of 7 or above. Patients with a Gleason score of 7 or above had increased use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and prostatectomy, especially among patients aged 75 years and older. Among patients with a Gleason score of 6 or below non-Hispanic black men were less likely to undergo active surveillance than non-Hispanic white men. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a large increase in the use of active surveillance among men with a Gleason score of 6 or below. However, non-Hispanic black men with a Gleason score of 6 or below are less likely to receive active surveillance.

Marked Decrease Over Time in Conversion Surgery After Active Surveillance of Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma.

Background: Active surveillance for low-risk papillary microcarcinoma (PMC) of the thyroid is an accepted and safe management strategy. However, some patients undergo conversion surgery after the initiation of active surveillance for various reasons. We investigated the reasons for conversion surgery and whether and how they changed over time. Methods: We enrolled 2288 patients with PMC who underwent active surveillance. Of these, 162 (7.1%) underwent conversion surgery >12 months after initiating active surveillance due to disease progression (57 patients), patient preference (43 patients), physician preference (31 patients), other associated thyroid or parathyroid diseases (24 patients), and other reasons (7 patients). We analyzed cumulative conversion rates not only in the whole cohort but also in the first three major subsets based on the reasons for surgery. We also divided our whole cohort into two groups based on the period of active surveillance commencement: the first-half group (February 2005-November 2011; 561 patients) and the second-half group (December 2011-June 2017; 1727 patients). Results: The criteria for PMC progression did not differ between the first- and second-half groups. The proportion of female patients in the physician preference group was significantly higher than that in the disease progression and the patient preference groups. Tumor size at surgery was larger, and tumor volume-doubling rate was higher in the disease progression group than in the other two groups. Patients in the second-half group were significantly less likely to undergo conversion surgery than those in the first-half group. Furthermore, conversion surgery rates in the second-half group were significantly lower than those in the first-half group in the patient preference, physician preference, and disease progression groups. Conclusions: Patients with PMC in the second-half group were significantly less likely to undergo conversion surgery than those in the first-half group regardless of the reason. This is probably because data accumulation of favorable outcomes with active surveillance significantly contributed to physicians' confidence and patients' trust and understanding of this disease.

Update on Multiparametric Prostate MRI During Active Surveillance: Current and Future Trends and Role of the PRECISE Recommendations.

Active surveillance for low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer is a conservative management approach that aims to avoid or delay active treatment until there is evidence of disease progression. In recent years, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has been increasingly used in active surveillance and has shown great promise in patient selection and monitoring. This has been corroborated by publication of the Prostate Cancer Radiologic Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) recommendations, which define the ideal reporting standards for mpMRI during active surveillance. The PRECISE recommendations include a system that assigns a score from 1 to 5 (the PRECISE score) for the assessment of radiologic change on serial mpMRI scans. PRECISE scores are defined as follows: a score of 3 indicates radiologic stability, a score of 1 or 2 denotes radiologic regression, and a score of 4 or 5 indicates radiologic progression. In the present study, we discuss current and future trends in the use of mpMRI during active surveillance and illustrate the natural history of prostate cancer on serial scans according to the PRECISE recommendations. We highlight how the ability to classify radiologic change on mpMRI with use of the PRECISE recommendations helps clinical decision making.

Contemporary Trends in Presentation and Management of Spermatocytic Seminoma.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the presentation and management of spermatocytic seminoma (SS) compared to classic seminoma in adults utilizing a large cancer registry. METHODS: Patients >18 years of age in the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2016 who underwent orchiectomy for testicular tumors were identified. Demographics, oncologic characteristics, and treatment patterns were compared between patients with SS and classic seminoma. RESULTS: Of 53,481 adults receiving orchiectomy, 29,208 were diagnosed with classic seminoma and 299 (1%) with SS. Compared to patients with classic seminoma, SS patients were older (57 vs 39 years) and more likely to be African-American (odds ratio (OR) 1.8) and insured by Medicare (OR 2.0; all P <.05). SS patients had larger tumors on presentation (3-6 cm: OR 1.8; >6 cm: OR 1.8), but were less likely to have ≥pT2 stage (OR 0.5), regional nodal involvement (Clinical Stage II: OR 0.3), or distant metastatic disease (Clinical Stage III: OR 0.1; all P <.01). For postorchiectomy management, 73.6% of SS patients underwent surveillance while 24.5% had active treatment (retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, chemotherapy, radiation, or a combination). When stratified by year, there was an increasing trend toward surveillance compared to active treatment. CONCLUSION: SS is a rare germ cell tumor that typically presents as a larger tumor in older patients. Although these tumors are less likely to be characterized by advanced disease compared to classic seminoma, many patients have undergone aggressive postorchiectomy treatment in the past. Importantly, treatment trends have shifted toward surveillance in recent years with adjuvant therapy limited primarily to higher stage tumors.

Rates of primary and secondary treatments for patients on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer-A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The rate of primary and secondary treatment while on active surveillance (AS) for localized prostate cancer at the general population level is unknown. Our objective was to determine the patterns of secondary treatments after primary surgery or radiation for patients who undergo AS. METHODS: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study of men aged 50-80 years old in Ontario, Canada, between 2008 and 2016. We identified 26 742 patients with prostate cancer, a Gleason grade score ≤7, and an index prostate-specific antigen ≤10 ng/mL. Patients were categorized as undergoing AS with or without delayed primary treatment (DT; treatment >6 months after diagnosis) versus immediate treatment (IT; treatment ≤6 months). Patients receiving DT and IT were propensity score matched and the rate of secondary treatment (surgery or radiation ± androgen deprivation treatment) was compared using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: We identified 10 214 patients who underwent AS and 11 884 patients who underwent IT. Among patients undergoing AS, 3724 (36.5%) eventually underwent DT and among them, 406 (10.9%) underwent secondary treatment. The median time to DT was 1.2 years (IQR 0.5-8.1 years). The relative rate of undergoing secondary treatment was similar in the DT vs IT group (HR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.79-1.08). The risk of death in the DT group was higher compared to patients who did not undergo treatment (HR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.01-1.49). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with localized prostate cancer on AS, one third undergo DT. The rate of secondary treatment was similar between the DT and IT groups. Patients in the DT group may experience a higher risk of mortality compared to those who remained on AS.

Temporal trends in the number of men electing for conservative management for low-risk prostate cancer in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent with the decrease in the number of men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa), the proportion of men with low-risk PCa managed conservatively (active surveillance or watchful waiting) has increased in the United States. We aimed to determine whether this increase is a result of more men being managed conservatively or rather a higher proportion of the diminishing number of low-risk PCa managed this way. METHODS: The SEER "Prostate Watchful Waiting Database" identified men managed initially with conservative management between 2010 and 2016. Men > 40 years old who were diagnosed with low-risk (Gleason score 3 + 3, T1-T2a, PSA level < 10 ng/mL) PCa were included. Age-standardized and age-specific PCa incidence and conservative management rates were calculated per 100,000 man-years. The annual percent change in rates for the entire time period was also calculated. RESULTS: The incidence of low-risk PCa declined by 11.8% per year (95% confidence interval [CI] -15.4% to -8.0%), whereas the number of men assigned to conservative management for low-risk disease did not increase significantly, rising by +3.7% per year (95% CI -0.7% to 8.4%). In age-specific analysis, the number of men < 60 years and those who were 60-69 years managed conservatively increased by +9.6% per year (95% CI 2.7% to 16.9%) and 4.5% per year (95% CI 0.1% to 9.1%), respectively, whereas the number of men ≥ 70 years electing conservative management remained stable at -4% per year (95% CI -11.2% to 3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The number of men electing conservative management has remained largely stable between 2010 and 2016, despite an increase in the proportion of low-risk PCa managed in this manner.

Bloqueo auriculoventricular en pacientes en tratamiento con fármacos bradicardizantes. Variables predictoras de la necesidad de implante de marcapasos / Atrioventricular block in patients undergoing treatment with bradycardic drugs. Predictors of pacemaker requirement

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: El bloqueo auriculoventricular (BAV) en presencia de fármacos bradicardizantes (FBZ) puede ser reversible, y está en controversia el implante de marcapasos. El objetivo es analizar la necesidad de tratamiento con marcapasos a medio plazo, tras la suspensión de los FBZ, e identificar factores predictores. MÉTODOS: Se estudió a una cohorte de pacientes que acudieron a urgencias con BAV de alto grado mientras tomaban FBZ. Se estudió la persistencia de BAV tras la interrupción del fármaco, la recurrencia en los pacientes con resolución del BAV y las variables predictoras asociadas con la necesidad de marcapasos a los 3 años de seguimiento. RESULTADOS: De 127 pacientes (edad, 79 [71-83] años), en 60 (47,2%) se resolvió el BAV; de estos, en 40 (66,6%) el BAV recurrió en los 24 meses de seguimiento medio; 107 pacientes (84,3%) tuvieron indicación de implante de marcapasos pese a suspenderse los FBZ. Las variables asociadas con la necesidad de marcapasos a los 3 años en el multivariable fueron: frecuencia cardiaca<35 lpm (OR=8,12; IC95%, 1,82-36,17); síntomas diferentes del síncope (OR=4,09; IC95%, 1,18-14,13) y QRS ancho (OR=5,65; IC95%, 1,77-18,04). El tratamiento con antiarrítmicos no se asoció con necesidad de marcapasos (OR=0,12; IC95%, 0,02-0,66). CONCLUSIONES: Más del 80% de los pacientes con BAV secundario a FBZ precisan implante de marcapasos a pesar de suspenderlos; los predictores son el QRS ancho, la frecuencia cardiaca <35 lpm y la presentación clínica distinta del síncope

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Atrioventricular block (AVB) in the presence of bradycardic drugs (BD) can be reversible, and pacemaker implantation is controversial. Our objective was to analyze the pacemaker implantation rate in the mid-term, after BD suspension, and to identify predictive factors. METHODS: We performed a cohort study that included patients attending the emergency department with high-grade AVB in the context of BD. We studied the persistence of AVB after BD discontinuation, recurrence in patients with AVB resolution, and the predictive variables associated with pacemaker requirement at 3 years. RESULTS: Of 127 patients included (age, 79 [71-83] years), BAV resolved in 60 (47.2%); among these patients, recurrence occurred during the 24-month median follow-up in 40 (66.6%). Pacemaker implantation was required in 107 patients (84.3%), despite BD discontinuation. On multivariable analysis, the variables associated with pacemaker need at 3 years were heart rate <35 bpm (OR, 8.12; 95%CI, 1.82-36.17), symptoms other than syncope (OR, 4.09; 95%CI, 1.18-14.13), and wide QRS (OR, 5.65; 95%CI, 1.77-18.04). Concomitant antiarrhythmic treatment was associated with AVB resolution (OR, 0.12; 95%CI, 0.02-0.66). CONCLUSIONS: More than 80% of patients with AVB secondary to BD require pacemaker implantation despite drug discontinuation. Predictive variables were wide QRS, heart rate <35 bpm, and clinical presentation other than syncope

National trends in the management of low-risk prostate cancer: analyzing the impact of Medicaid expansion in the United States.

PURPOSE: To evaluate recent trends in the management of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) and analyze differences in adoption of surveillance based on state Medicaid-expansion status in the United States (US). METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified men diagnosed from 2012 to 2016. Men with histologically confirmed low-risk PCa defined as PSA less than 10 ng/ml, Gleason score ≤ 6, and cT1-T2a were included. The Cochran Armitage test was used to evaluate trends in surveillance versus treatment. Comparisons on surveillance adoption based on 2014 Medicaid expansion status and difference-in-difference analysis were performed. RESULTS: The cohort included 84,340 men. During the study period, surveillance as initial management increased from 13.6% in 2012 to 32.1% in 2016 (p < 0.01). When comparing by Medicaid-expansion status, expansion states had higher rates in adoption of surveillance as compared to non-expansion states over the study period (36.6 vs 28.5%). Following expansion, men in expansion states were 1.94% more likely to be treated with surveillance than in earlier years (p < 0.01). Men in non-expansion states were 1.97% more likely to receive surveillance following expansion (p < 0.01) for a relative 0.03% difference in active surveillance adoption among men with low-risk PCa (95% CI - 0.004 to 0.013, p = 0.344). CONCLUSION: Based on the data from 2012 to 2016, there has been a significant increase in active surveillance as initial management for low-risk PCa in the US. Medicaid expansion was not found to be detrimental in adoption of surveillance. Understanding the impact of payer status on health outcomes can aid in the development of future health care policies aiming to mitigate disparities.

The New Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate with Watchful Waiting Database: Opportunities and Limitations.

BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS)/watchful waiting (WW) strategy for localized prostate cancer (PCa) is increasingly and broadly endorsed as a preferred option for initial treatment of men with very low- and low-risk PCa, but outcomes can be difficult to analyze in traditional, population-based registries. The recently released Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Prostate with WW dataset provides an opportunity to understand national patterns and trends in AS/WW, but the data source itself has not been well described. OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive description of this dataset and investigate possible biases due to missing data. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The SEER is a population-based epidemiologic registry in the USA. Newly diagnosed PCa patient data were collected from 18 SEER registries between 2010 and 2015, with inclusion of a new treatment variable for AS/WW. We identified 316 724 patients in the entire cohort and 257 060 men with clinically localized PCa (T1-2N0M0). INTERVENTION: Various primary treatments for PCa. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The degree of missing data for each variable was measured. In order to investigate possible bias due to missing data for cancer characterization, we compared two versions of the data: one that excluded cases with missing data and one dataset generated applying multiple imputations. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Only 46% of cases had complete data on basic cancer characteristics for risk stratification. The excluded dataset (N=118 821) differed significantly from the multiple imputation dataset (N=257 060) in the distribution of every reported variable (all p<0.001). The dataset does not distinguish WW from AS, which is a limitation. CONCLUSIONS: While the SEER Prostate with WW dataset offers a new method to describe treatment trends for men with PCa, including the use of AS/WW, the amount of missing data should not be ignored. PATIENT SUMMARY: While the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate with Watchful Waiting dataset offers a new method to describe treatment trends for men with prostate cancer, including the use of active surveillance, it has a significant amount of missing data, which can be a source of potential bias if not addressed properly.

Contemporary Assessment of Long-Term Survival Rates in Patients With Stage I Nonseminoma Germ-Cell Tumor of the Testis: Population-Based Comparison Between Surveillance and Active Treatment After Initial Orchiectomy.

BACKGROUND: Historical data demonstrated similar survival outcomes in patients with stage I nonseminoma germ-cell tumor of the testis (NSGCTT) subjected to either surveillance or active treatment (AT) after orchiectomy. However, data with long-term follow-up are unavailable. We tested contemporary treatment rates and their effect on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) relative to surveillance, as well as after stratification between chemotherapy (CHT) versus retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients with stage I NSGCTT with initial orchiectomy within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1988-2015). Subsequent surveillance versus CHT versus RPLND use rates were reported. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing-risks regression (CRR) models were used after propensity score (PS) matching. These tests first compared surveillance versus AT (CHT vs. RPLND) and subsequently CHT versus RPLND. RESULTS: Of 5034 patients with stage I NSGCTT, 61.2%, 24.9%, and 13.9%, respectively, underwent surveillance, CHT, and RPLND. Between 1988 and 2015, surveillance (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC]: +1.1%, P < .001) and CHT (EAPC: +2.3%, P < .001) rates increased. RPLND rates decreased (EAPC: -5.7%; P < .001). After PS matching, CRR models failed to identify AT as an independent predictor of lower mortality relative to surveillance. However, after PS matching, CRR models identified RPLND as an independent predictor of lower CSM (hazard ratio, 0.26; P = .002) relative to CHT. No difference in OCM rates was recorded (hazard ratio, 1.25; P = .2). CONCLUSION: Surveillance and CHT use rates increased while RPLND decreased in the last two decades. Virtually the same outcomes were recorded between surveillance and AT. However, within AT, RPLND was associated with lower CSM than CHT.

Trends in the initial management of vestibular schwannoma in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Vestibular schwannomas are benign tumors of the 8th cranial nerve. Initial treatment options include active surveillance, surgery, and/or radiation therapy. We analyzed the United States National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with vestibular schwannomas and evaluated the initial management trends after diagnosis. METHODS: We queried the NCDB for patients with vestibular schwannomas, excluding patients who did not have schwannomas of the vestibulocochlear nerve. Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate for predictors of initial local therapy at diagnosis. All statistical analyses were performed using commercially available software (SPSS, Version 22; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). RESULTS: A total of 28,446 patients met the inclusion criteria. In this cohort, 7351 (25.8%) underwent observation, 12,362 (43.5%) underwent surgical resection, 7785 (27.4%) underwent SRS, 824 (2.9%) underwent EBRT, and 124 (0.4%) underwent RT NOS. On multivariate analysis, younger age, increased distance to treating facility, Charlson/Deyo score of 1, primary payer insurance, facility location and facility type (academic or cancer center) (p < 0.001) were all factors that predicted patients undergoing initial definitive treatment. CONCLUSION: Age, distance to treating facility, Charlson/Deyo score, primary payer, facility location, and facility type are factors that influence initial treatment for patients with vestibular schwannoma. Clinical stratification systems are needed to identify which patients would benefit most from initial local therapy versus active surveillance.

Evolving Trends for Selected Treatments of T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate contemporary trends in the management of small renal masses and how patient age has impacted practice patterns. METHODS: Using the NCDB Participant User File (PUF) from 2002 to 2015, we identified patients with T1a renal masses. The initial treatment was categorized as radical nephrectomy (RN), partial nephrectomy (PN), ablation, or active surveillance (AS). A multinominal logistic regression model was used to identify significant factors impacting treatment. RESULTS: We identified 75,691 patients for analysis. RN, PN, and ablation accounted for 28%, 52%, and 12%, respectively, while 8% were managed with AS. In the past decade the likelihood of undergoing PN, ablation, or surveillance compared to RN has consistently increased, independent of age, sex, race, comorbidity, tumor size, or institution. As age increased, patients were independently less likely to undergo PN and more likely to be managed with ablation or AS. Compared to patients under 40 years of age, patients between 70 and 79 were far less likely to undergo PN (RR 0.58, P< .01), and far more likely to undergo either ablation (RR 5.53, P< .01) or AS (RR 3.7, P< .01). CONCLUSION: Trends in small renal mass management continue to evolve, with PN supplanting RN over the past decade as the predominant surgical treatment. Age significantly impacts treatment selection, particularly in older cohorts whom are much more likely to undergo ablation or AS. While the use of minimally invasive therapies has increased over the past decade, AS lags behind despite quality data supporting its use. When controlling for multiple clinical factors, PN, ablation and surveillance have consistently increased in utilization compared to RN.

[Transition of treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer towards "watch and wait"].

Therapeutic goal for locally advance rectal cancer (LARC) patients includes long-term survival and function preservation of pelvic organs. During the recent two decades, treatment strategy for LARC is gradually shifing to minimally invasive surgery, even avoiding a major surgery. "Watch and wait (W&W)" strategy is effective in dramatically decreasing surgical trauma and significantly improving preservation of defecation, urination and sexual function. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) shifts all or part of adjuvant chemotherapy to the neoadjuvant phase and has showed obvious advantage in tumor shrinkage and complete clinical response (cCR) achievement. This article will summarize the transition of treatment strategy of LARC towards W&W from standard treatment. After more than ten years of development, both NCCN and ESMO guidelines recommend stratified neoadjuvant treatment considerations based on distinct risk classifications and especially suggest TNT for LARC patients with advanced diseases, which affirms the value of TNT in tumor shrinkage. Although accumulating data show that pelvic control and organ preservation using W&W strategy after cCR is equal or non-inferior to standard surgery, impact on long-term survival still needs prospective randomized controlled study; no consensus has been achieved for the detail of the W&W strategy. Thus W&W strategy is suggested to applied in hospitals specialized in the treatment of rectal cancer within the framework of multiple disciplinary treatment. In view of special medical conditions of our country, we still need to accumulate more experience and data of W&W strategy for rectal cancer patients with appeals for sphincter preservation and actively participate in international researches.