[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, full version]. / Recommandations pratiques pour le diagnostic et la prise en charge de la fibrose pulmonaire idiopathique ­ Actualisation 2021. Version intégrale.

BACKGROUND: Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated. METHODS: Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale. RESULTS: After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis. CONCLUSION: These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, short version]. / Recommandations pratiques pour le diagnostic et la prise en charge de la fibrose pulmonaire idiopathique ­ Actualisation 2021. Version courte.

BACKGROUND: Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated. METHODS: Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale. RESULTS: After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis. CONCLUSION: These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

[The biological rationale for immunotherapy in cancer]. / Rationnel biologique de l'immunothérapie des cancers.

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy aims to promote the immune system's activity against malignant cells by stimulating the response to several tumor antigens. STATE OF THE ART: Immunosurveillance may adjust the immunogenicity of tumors. To be effective, immunity must induce the specific activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, as well as activation of innate immunity. Activator and inhibitory costimulatory molecules regulate T lymphocyte activation at immunity checkpoints such as PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4. Adaptive immune resistance confers tumour resistance to immunosurveillance through these immune checkpoints. PERSPECTIVES: Approaches involving the combination of several immunotherapies with each other or with chemotherapy and radiotherapy and antibodies against other molecules of costimulation are under development. The development of biomarkers, which can select a targeted population and predict therapeutic response, represents a major challenge. Tumour high-throughput sequencing could refine "immunoscore". Intratumoral T cell receptor seems to represent a promising biomarker. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous challenges still remain in developing research approaches for the development of immunotherapies.

Detection of PD-L1 in circulating tumor cells and white blood cells from patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells has been associated with improved efficacy to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and emerged as a potential biomarker for the selection of patients to cancer immunotherapies. We investigated the utility of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating white blood cells (WBCs) as a noninvasive method to evaluate PD-L1 status in advanced NSCLC patients. Patients and methods: CTCs and circulating WBCs were enriched from peripheral blood samples (ISET® platform; Rarecells) from 106 NSCLC patients. PD-L1 expression on ISET filters and matched-tumor tissue was evaluated by automated immunostaining (SP142 antibody; Ventana), and quantified in tumor cells and WBCs. Results: CTCs were detected in 80 (75%) patients, with levels ranging from 2 to 256 CTCs/4 ml, and median of 60 CTCs/4 ml. Among 71 evaluable samples with matched-tissue and CTCs, 6 patients (8%) showed ≥1 PD-L1-positive CTCs and 11 patients (15%) showed ≥1% PD-L1-positive tumor cells in tumor tissue with 93% concordance between tissue and CTCs (sensitivity = 55%; specificity = 100%). From 74 samples with matched-tissue and circulating WBCs, 40 patients (54%) showed ≥1% PD-L1-positive immune infiltrates in tumor tissue and 39 patients (53%) showed ≥1% PD-L1 positive in circulating WBCs, with 80% concordance between blood and tissue (sensitivity = 82%; specificity = 79%). We found a trend for worse survival in patients receiving first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy treatments, whose tumors express PD-L1 in CTCs or immune cells (progression-free and overall survival), similar to the effects of PD-L1 expression in matched-patient tumors. Conclusions: These results demonstrated that PD-L1 status in CTCs and circulating WBCs correlate with PD-L1 status in tumor tissue, revealing the potential of CTCs assessment as a noninvasive real-time biopsy to evaluate PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC.

Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Biological Principles and Future Opportunities.

Immunotherapy aims to amplify the anticancer immune response through reactivation of the lymphocytic response raised against several tumor neo-antigens. To obtain an effective immune response, this therapeutic approach requires that a number of immunological checkpoints be passed, such as the activation of excitatory costimulatory signals or the avoidance of coinhibitory molecules. Among the immune checkpoints, the interaction of the membrane-bound ligand PD-1 and its receptor PD-L1 has received much attention because of remarkable efficacy in numerous clinical trials for various cancer types, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, several limitations exist with these therapeutic agents when used as monotherapy, with objective responses observed in only 30-40% of patients, with the majority of patients demonstrating innate resistance, and approximately 25% of responders later demonstrating disease progression. Recent developments in the understanding of cancer immunology have the potential to identify mechanisms of innate and acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors through translational research in human samples. This review focuses on the biological basic principles for immunological checkpoint blockade, and highlights the current status and the perspectives of this therapeutic approach in NSCLC patients.

Early infectious acute respiratory distress syndrome is characterized by activation and proliferation of alveolar T-cells.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in humans is characterized by the infiltration of polymorphonuclears in the alveolar spaces. However, the role of T-cells in ARDS is unknown. Our aim was to characterize the T-cell phenotype in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) during the early phase of acute lung infection(ALI)/ARDS-infected patients in comparison to a control group (CG). BAL lymphocyte phenotypes of two ALI, 16 ARDS, and eight CG were examined by flow cytometry. ALI/ARDS showed a significant increase in CD4 and CD8 T-cell activation as compared to CG. Moreover, a significant level of proliferation was observed using the Ki67 marker in ARDS patients as compared to controls (median): 37 versus 6 % for CD4 T-cells (p = 0.022) and 34 versus 2 % for CD8 T-cells (p = 0.009). In contrast, the percentage of T-regulatory cells and apoptotic T-cells were similar in both groups. Among costimulatory molecules, we observed an overexpression of CTLA-4/CD152 on CD4 T-cells in ALI/ARDS as compared to CG: 30 versus 7 %, respectively (p = 0.063). In further characterizing T-cell subsets expressing high levels of CD152, we found the presence of IL-17 secreting CD4 T-cells in ALI/ARDS. In humans, ALI/ARDS due to infection is associated with a high level of T-cell activation and proliferation, along with the presence of Th17 cells, which are known to attract polymorphonuclears.

Detection of circulating tumor cells from lung cancer patients in the era of targeted therapy: promises, drawbacks and pitfalls.

Interest in biomarkers in the field of thoracic oncology is focused on the search for new robust tests for diagnosis (in particular for screening), prognosis and theragnosis. These biomarkers can be detected in tissues and/or cells, but also in biological fluids, mainly the blood. In this context, there is growing interest in the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the blood of lung cancer patients since CTC identification, enumeration and characterization may have a direct impact on diagnosis, prognosis and theragnosis in the daily clinical practice. Many direct and indirect methods have been developed to detect and characterize CTCs in lung cancer patients. However, these different approaches still hold limitations and many of them have demonstrated unequal sensitivity and specificity. Indeed, these methods hold advantages but also certain disadvantages. Therefore, despite the promises, it is currently difficult and premature to apply this methodology to the routine care of lung cancer patients. This situation is the consequence of the analysis of the methodological approaches for the detection and characterization of CTCs and of the results published to date. Finally, the advent of targeted cancer therapies in thoracic oncology has stimulated considerable interest in non-invasive detection of genomic alterations in tumors over time through the analysis of CTCs, an approach that may help clinicians to optimize therapeutic strategies for lung cancer patients. We describe here the main methods for CTC detection, the advantages and limitations of these different approaches and the potential usefulness and value of CTC characterization in the field of thoracic oncology.

Clinical value of circulating endothelial cells and of soluble CD146 levels in patients undergoing surgery for non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that endothelial injury, as demonstrated by the presence of circulating endothelial cells (CECs), may predict clinical outcome in cancer patients. In addition, soluble CD146 (sCD146) may reflect activation of angiogenesis. However, no study has investigated their combined clinical value in patients undergoing resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Data were collected from preoperative blood samples from 74 patients who underwent resection for NSCLC. Circulating endothelial cells were defined, using the CellSearch Assay, as CD146+CD105+CD45-DAPI+. In parallel, sCD146 was quantified using an ELISA immunoassay. These experiments were also performed on a group of 20 patients with small-cell lung cancer, 60 healthy individuals and 23 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. RESULTS: The CEC count and the plasma level of sCD146 were significantly higher in NSCLC patients than in the sub-groups of controls (P<0.001). Moreover, an increased CEC count was associated with higher levels of sCD146 (P=0.010). Both high CEC count and high sCD146 plasma level at baseline significantly correlated with shorter progression-free survival (P<0.001, respectively) and overall survival (P=0.005; P=0.009) of NSCLC patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides supportive evidence to show that both a high CEC count and a high sCD146 level at baseline correlate with poor prognosis and may be useful for the prediction of clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for NSCLC.

[Residents in respiratory medicine: Assessment of the course and wishes regarding their career]. / Appréciation du cursus et vœux relatifs à l'exercice futur des internes en pneumologie.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the feelings of residents in respiratory medicine regarding the quality and organization of their training and towards their career prospects. METHODS: A prospective survey conducted over the Internet among all the members of the French Young Pulmonologists Association (AJPO2). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two (71.5%) members responded. The rating given to theoretical training was 6 [5-7] whereas the practical training was rated at 7 [6-8] out of 10. The majority of the residents considered that the length of their course should be adapted (80.3%). Of them, 74.2% wanted to add a mandatory semester. The proposed mandatory semester was in bronchoscopy (40.3%). Seventy-two percent of the resident wanted to acquire a specialisation, the most common of which was in oncology (36.6%). Among the residents, 96.2% wanted to conduct a fellowship. The main reason for this was their feeling of inability to correctly handle patients at the end of their residency. Of the residents, 55.3% were considering working in a public hospital. CONCLUSION: There are opportunities to improve the French respiratory residency training both in its theory and practical aspects. The modalities of this training could also be adapted. Access to a fellowship is a major concern for the residents.

[Cost-effectiveness of lung volume reduction coil treatment in emphysema. STIC REVOLENS]. / Évaluation médico-économique de la réduction volumique endobronchique par spirales. STIC REVOLENS.

BACKGROUND: Medical therapeutic options for the treatment of emphysema remain limited. Lung volume reduction surgery is infrequently used because of its high morbi-mortality. Endobronchial lung volume reduction coil (LVRC(®), PneumRx, Mountain View, CA) treatment has been recently developed and has been shown to be feasible and associated with an acceptable safety profile, while resulting in improvements in dyspnea, exercise capacity and lung function. The objective of this study is to analyze the cost effectiveness of LVRC treatment in severe emphysema. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study, randomized with a 1:1 ratio (LVRC vs conventional treatment) will include 100 patients who will be followed up for 1year. The primary outcome measure is the 6-month improvement of the 6-minute walk test: the percentage of patients showing an improvement of at least 54m will be compared between groups. A cost-effectiveness study will estimate the cost of LVRC treatment, the global cost of this therapeutic option and will compare the cost between patients treated by LVRC and by medical treatment alone. EXPECTED RESULTS: This study should allow validating the clinical efficacy of LVRC in severe emphysema. The cost-effectiveness study will assess the medical-economic impact of the LVRC therapeutic option.

Bronchoscopic treatments for emphysema.

In late stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema can worsen respiratory symptoms, not only via the loss of surface for gas exchange, but also via alterations in mechanical properties of the respiratory system (dynamic and static hyperinflation). Emphysematous lung volume reduction aims at improving respiratory mechanics and symptomatology in patients with advanced emphysema. Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been shown to be effective in selected patient populations, but its morbidity and costs are quite elevated. Alternatives to LVRS do not remove emphysematous lung tissue per se, but rather consist of devices aiming to: 1) reduce the volume that affected lung parenchyma occupies (unidirectional endobronchial valves or plugs, parenchymal injection of bioactive scarring agents); 2) redistribute ventilatory flow (airway bypass systems). Preliminary studies of these devices have shown that they are relatively safe. These also show modest benefits in exercise capacity, although individual subjects can experience spectacular improvement. Current objective is to identify predictors of response to therapy with such devices.