Real-world effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib and abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Objective: We compared the 52-week effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) and abatacept (ABT) in patients with RA in a real-world setting and investigated a role of human leucocyte antigens (HLA)-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) in the effectiveness. Methods: RA patients starting TOF (n = 187) and ABT (n = 183) were enrolled. Effectiveness was compared after reducing the selection bias to a minimum using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores. The influence of SE alleles on effectiveness was compared within each treatment group. A treatment group comparison was also performed within SE-positive and SE-negative groups. Results: Herpes zoster and some laboratory abnormalities were more frequent in the TOF group than in the ABT group. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between treatment groups after adjustments with IPTW. The TOF group had a significantly higher proportion of DAS in 28 joints using ESR (DAS28-ESR) remission at week 52 than the ABT group. The DAS28-ESR at week 12 and thereafter was not affected by the copy number of SE alleles in the TOF group, but decreased significantly as the copy number increased in the ABT group. In SE-positive patients, remission and drug retention rates did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. In SE-negative patients, the TOF group showed significantly higher remission and drug retention rates than the ABT group. Conclusion: The present results suggest that TOF is more effective with regard to remission at week 52 based on treatment responses in SE-negative RA patients.

Impact of the HLA-DRB1 shared epitope on responses to treatment with tofacitinib or abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of tofacitinib and abatacept and clarify the impact of the HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) on responses to these treatments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: After adjustments by propensity score matching, 70 out of 161 patients receiving tofacitinib and 70 out of 131 receiving abatacept were extracted. The clinical effectiveness of both drugs over 24 weeks and the impact of the copy numbers of SE on effectiveness outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: The percentage of patients in remission in the 28-joint count disease activity score using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) did not significantly differ between patients receiving tofacitinib and abatacept at week 24 (32% vs 37%, p = 0.359). The mean change at week 4 in DAS28-ESR from baseline was significantly greater in patients receiving tofacitinib than in those receiving abatacept (- 1.516 vs - 0.827, p = 0.0003). The percentage of patients in remission at week 4 was 30% with tofacitinib and 15% with abatacept (p = 0.016). When patients were stratified by the copy numbers of SE alleles, differences in these numbers did not affect DAS28-ESR scores of patients receiving tofacitinib. However, among patients receiving abatacept, DAS28-ESR scores were significantly lower in patients carrying 2 copies of SE alleles than in those carrying 0 copies at each time point throughout the 24-week period. Furthermore, the percentage of patients in remission with DAS28-ESR at week 24 was not affected by the copy numbers of SE alleles in patients receiving tofacitinib (p = 0.947), whereas it significantly increased as the copy numbers became higher in patients receiving abatacept (p = 0.00309). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed a correlation between the presence of SE and DAS28-ESR remission in patients receiving abatacept (OR = 25.881, 95% CI = 3.140-213.351, p = 0.0025), but not in those receiving tofacitinib (OR = 1.473, 95% CI = 0.291-7.446, p = 0.639). CONCLUSIONS: Although the clinical effectiveness of tofacitinib and abatacept was similar at week 24, tofacitinib was superior to abatacept for changes from baseline in DAS28-ESR and the achievement of remission at week 4. SE positivity was associated with the achievement of DAS28-ESR remission by week 24 in patients receiving abatacept, but not in those receiving tofacitinib.

Predictive value of serum amyloid a levels for requirement of concomitant methotrexate in tocilizumab initiation: A post hoc analysis of the SURPRISE study.

Objectives: To identify predictive factors for remission by tocilizumab monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of the SURPRISE study, a 2-year randomized, controlled study comparing the efficacy of tocilizumab with (ADD-ON) and without methotrexate (SWITCH). The primary endpoint was DAS28-ESR remission (<2.6) at week 24. The change in modified total Sharp score from baseline to week 52 (ΔmTSS/year) was also assessed as an endpoint. The effect of clinical parameters at baseline on remission was estimated by logistic regression analysis.Results: In SWITCH (n = 96), CRP, SAA, RF, and DAS28 at baseline showed predictive value for DAS28 remission in unadjusted analysis. Adjusted analysis confirmed SAA and DAS28 as predictive factors, with SAA having the highest value (ROC-AUC = 0.731). Furthermore, structural remission (ΔmTSS/year ≤ 0.5) rate was significantly higher in patients with SAA of < 50.0 µg/mL than other patients. In contrast, in ADD-ON (n = 98), only DAS28 showed predictive value for DAS28 remission. In patients with SAA < 50.0 µg/mL, both DAS28 remission and structural remission rate were comparable between SWITCH and ADD-ON.Conclusion: RA patients with low SAA levels at baseline may benefit similarly from tocilizumab with and without methotrexate.Trial registration number: NCT01120366.

Current clinical evidence of tocilizumab for the treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis: a prospective case series for microscopic polyangiitis in a combination with corticosteroids and literature review.

The purpose of this study is to report the efficacy and safety of a combination of tocilizumab (TCZ) and high-dose corticosteroid (CS) in two patients with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and review the published current clinical evidence on TCZ in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV), except for large vessel vasculitis (LVV) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). Two MPA patients were treated with TCZ at 8 mg/kg every month for 1 year and CS (prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks, followed by tapering) in a prospective single-arm, single-center, cohort, open-label pilot study (UMIN clinical trials: 000012072). We performed a systematic literature search (PubMed and ICHUSHI [Japan Medical Abstracts Society] until June 30, 2017) to identify published reports on patients with all vasculitis other than LVV/PMR, who were treated with TCZ. We successfully treated the first patient. However, the other patient had serious infection probably associated with the combination of TCZ and high-dose CS. The literature review identified 22 reports with a total of 34 patients who received TCZ for AAV, rheumatoid vasculitis, and other types of vasculitis, in addition to our patients. In 15 of 17 patients (88.2%) with primary and secondary AAV, especially MPA, TCZ induced clinical remission, although TCZ use for rheumatoid vasculitis and vasculitis with mucocutaneous lesions is controversial. This study suggested that TCZ therapy is a potential treatment strategy for patients with AAV. However, TCZ combined with high-dose of CS might not be an appropriate treatment. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Discontinuation of tofacitinib after achieving low disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicentre, observational study.

Objective: To determine whether tofacitinib can be discontinued in patients with RA who achieve low disease activity (LDA). Methods: RA patients with LDA after tofacitinib treatment in a phase III and long-term extension study were enrolled in this multicentre, non-randomized, open, prospective, observational study. The decision of discontinuation or continuation of tofacitinib was determined based on patient-physician decision making with informed consent. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who remained tofacitinib-free at post-treatment week 52. Clinical outcome was compared between those who continued and those who discontinued tofacitinib. The last observation carried forward method was used for patients who could not discontinue tofacitinib before week 52. Results: Of 64 patients, 54 discontinued and 10 continued tofacitinib therapy. At post-treatment week 52, 20 of the 54 patients (37%) of the discontinuation group remained tofacitinib-free without disease flare. Disease activity at post-treatment week 52 was higher in the discontinuation group than the continuation group. Among the discontinuation group, the RF titre at baseline was significantly lower in patients who remained tofacitinib-free than those who did not (40 vs 113 U/ml). In fact, a higher proportion of patients with lower RF remained tofacitinib-free at week 52 compared with those with higher RF at baseline. In patients who could not achieve tofacitinib-free status, re-initiation of tofacitinib or other biologics improved disease activity. Conclusion: It is possible to discontinue tofacitinib without flare in about a third of patients with RA. A low RF predicts maintenance of LDA after discontinuation of tofacitinib.

Comparison of adding tocilizumab to methotrexate with switching to tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate: 52-week results from a prospective, randomised, controlled study (SURPRISE study).

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety between tocilizumab added to methotrexate and tocilizumab switched from methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This is a 2-year randomised, controlled study. RA patients with moderate or high disease activity despite methotrexate were randomly assigned either to tocilizumab added to methotrexate (add-on) or tocilizumab switched from methotrexate (switch). The primary endpoint was the DAS28 remission rate at week 24. Secondary objectives included other clinical efficacy indices, radiological outcomes assessed with the van der Heijde-modified total Sharp scoring system (mTSS), and safety. RESULTS: Of 223 randomised patients, 83% completed 52 weeks. DAS28 remission rates at week 24 were 70% for add-on and 55% for switch (p=0.02), but they became comparable at week 52 (72% vs 70%, p=0.86). Structural remission rates (mTSS≤0.5) at week 52 were not different (66% vs 64%, p=0.92). However, clinically relevant radiographic progression rates (CRRP; mTSS≥3) tended to be higher with the switch than with the add-on (15% vs 7%, p=0.07). Radiographic progression in the CRRP patients was larger with the switch than with the add-on (9.0/year vs 5.0/year, p=0.04). The difference in the mean C-reactive protein of the CRRP patients was significant for the first 24 weeks (1.56 vs 0.49, p=0.001) but not for the following 28 weeks (0.10 vs 0.04, p=0.1). Overall safety was preferable in the switch group. CONCLUSIONS: In RA patients with inadequate response to methotrexate, tocilizumab added to methotrexate more rapidly suppressed inflammation than tocilizumab switched from methotrexate, leading to superior clinical efficacy and prevention of joint destruction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01120366.

Head-to-head comparison of the safety of tocilizumab and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients (RA) in clinical practice: results from the registry of Japanese RA patients on biologics for long-term safety (REAL) registry.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to directly compare the safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) and TNF inhibitors (TNFIs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in clinical practice. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included RA patients starting TCZ [TCZ group, n=302, 224.68 patient-years (PY)] or TNFIs [TNFI group, n=304, 231.01 PY] from 2008 to 2011 in the registry of Japanese RA patients on biologics for long-term safety registry. We assessed types and incidence rates (IRs) of serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious infections (SIs) during the first year of treatment. Risks of the biologics for SAEs or SIs were calculated using the Cox regression hazard analysis. RESULTS: Patients in the TCZ group had longer disease duration (P<0.001), higher disease activity (P=0.019) and more frequently used concomitant corticosteroids (P<0.001) than those in the TNFI group. The crude IR (/100 PY) of SIs [TCZ 10.68 vs. TNFI 3.03; IR ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]), 3.53 (1.52 to 8.18)], but not SAEs [21.36 vs. 14.72; 1.45 (0.94 to 2.25)], was significantly higher in the TCZ group compared with the TNFI group. However, after adjusting for covariates using the Cox regression hazard analysis, treatment with TCZ was not associated with higher risk for SAEs [hazard ratio (HR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.19] or SIs (HR 2.23, 95% CI 0.93 to 5.37). CONCLUSIONS: The adjusted risks for SAEs and SIs were not significantly different between TCZ and TNFIs, indicating an influence of clinical characteristics of the patients on the safety profile of the biologics in clinical practice.

Assessment of risks of pulmonary infection during 12 months following immunosuppressive treatment for active connective tissue diseases: a large-scale prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary infections (PI) are leading causes of death in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD). The PREVENT study (Pulmonary infections in patients REceiving immunosuppressiVE treatmeNT for CTD) assessed risk of PI in patients with active CTD in the contemporary era of advanced immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: In patients who started corticosteroids (n = 763), conventional immunosuppressants or biologics for active CTD were enrolled. Clinical and laboratory data, usage of drugs, and occurrence of PI were collected for 12 months. Baseline risk factors were investigated using Cox regression analysis. A nested case-control (NCC) study was performed with 1:2 matched case-control pairs to assess the risk for each drug category. RESULTS: During the observation period, 32 patients died (4.2%) and 66 patients were lost to followup (8.6%). Patients with PI (n = 61, 8%) had a significantly worse accumulated survival rate than patients without (p < 0.01). Cox hazard regression analysis using baseline data showed that these factors were significantly associated with PI: age ≥ 65 years (HR 3.87, 95% CI 2.22-6.74), ≥ 20 pack-years of smoking (2.63, 1.37-5.04), higher serum creatinine level (1.21, 1.05-1.41 per 1.0 mg/dl increase), and maximum prednisolone (PSL) dose during the first 2 weeks of treatment (2.81, 1.35-5.86 per 1.0 mg/kg/day increase). Logistic regression analysis by an NCC study revealed that maximum PSL dose within 14 days before PI (OR 4.82, 95% CI 1.36-17.01 per 1.0 mg/dl increase; 2.57, 1.28-5.16 if ≥ 0.5 mg/kg/day) was significantly associated with the events, while other immunosuppressants were not. CONCLUSION: Physicians should be aware of the higher risks for corticosteroids of PI than other immunosuppressants and assess these risk factors before immunosuppressive treatment, to prevent PI.

Pulmonary infections following immunosuppressive treatments during hospitalization worsen the short-term vital prognosis for patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: Connective tissue disease-associated interstitial pneumonia (CTD-IP) significantly affects the mortality of patients with CTD. The purpose of the present study is to identify causes and risk factors for death during hospitalization for immunosuppressive treatment of CTD-IP. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted that collected data from patients with CTD who had been hospitalized for commencing or intensifying immunosuppressive treatment of CTD-IP using a standardized case report form. Risk factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: A total of 322 CTD-IP patients were enrolled with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 84), systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 13), polymyositis (n = 33), dermatomyositis (n = 69), systemic sclerosis (n = 55), mixed connective tissue disease (n = 21), microscopic polyangiitis (n = 19), and overlap syndrome (n = 28). Of the 42 patients who died during hospitalization, 22 died from CTD-IP, 15 from CTD-IP and pulmonary infection, 2 from pulmonary infection, and 3 from other causes. Age ≥ 65 years and development of pulmonary infections after commencing or intensifying immunosuppressive treatments were identified as risk factors for death during hospitalization after adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSION: Careful consideration of the benefit-risk balance of immunosuppressive treatment for CTD-IP is indispensable for improving the short-term vital prognosis of these patients.

Efficacy and safety of abatacept in routine care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Orencia(®) as Biological Intensive Treatment for RA (ORBIT) study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of abatacept for treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 137 RA patients who were treated with abatacept for 24 weeks between October 2010 and June 2011 at four rheumatology centers in Japan. Outcomes were compared between biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients. Disease activity was assessed using the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). RESULTS: The retention rate of abatacept at 24 weeks was 79.6%. SDAI (from 24.6 ± 12.5 to 12.9 ± 11.6) and DAS28-ESR (from 5.2 ± 1.4 to 3.9 ± 1.4) decreased significantly from baseline to Week 24 (both P < 0.001). Remission/low disease activity were achieved in 2.2%/11.2% (SDAI) and in 5.3%/2.3% (DAS28-ESR). The change in SDAI and the remission/low disease activity rates at Week 24 was greater in biologic-naïve patients than in biologic-experienced patients. Structural remission (van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score ≤ 0.5) was achieved by 63.4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present results confirm that abatacept is effective in routine clinical practice and support its use as the first-line biologic agent in patients.

The risk of serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors decreased over time: a report from the registry of Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients on biologics for long-term safety (REAL) database.

To investigate changes in the risk for serious infections (SIs) over time in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFIs). This prospective cohort study included Japanese RA patients who began treatment with a TNFI from 2005 to 2007 (2005 group, n = 716, 634.2 patient years [PY]) and from 2008 to 2011 (2008 group, n = 352, 270.1 PY) at the time or after their enrollment in the registry of Japanese RA patients on biologics for long-term safety (REAL) database. Patients were observed for 12 months or until discontinuation of their initial TNFI in the REAL database. Drug discontinuation reasons and retention rates were analyzed. Incidence rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) were calculated with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). The Cox proportional hazard model was applied to estimate the risk for SIs. The retention rate in the 2008 group was significantly lower than the 2005 group (p < 0.001). Discontinuation rates due to lack of efficacy or good control for the 2008 group were significantly higher than the 2005 group (p < 0.001). The crude incidence rate ratios comparing the 2008 group with the 2005 group for SAEs were 0.93 (95 % CI 0.65-1.34) and for SIs were 0.50 (0.24-1.03). The 2008 group had significantly lower risk for SIs than the 2005 group after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio: 0.43 [0.20-0.93]). These results indicate significant decrease of the risk for SIs with TNFI treatment over time; this may be explained by evidence-based risk management of RA patients given TNFIs.

Addition of another disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug to methotrexate reduces the flare rate within 2 years after infliximab discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an open, randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: We examined whether the addition of another conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to methotrexate (MTX) upon infliximab (IFX) discontinuation in well-controlled rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients could suppress subsequent disease flare. METHODS: RA patients maintaining DAS28-CRP (Disease Activity Score of 28 joints with C-reactive protein) scores < 2.6 for ≥ 6 months with IFX were randomized either to receive addition of bucillamine (BUC) to MTX (BUC + MTX group; n = 24) or not (MTX group; n = 31) upon discontinuing IFX. The primary endpoint was the flare rate within 2 years of IFX discontinuation. RESULTS: Six patients discontinuing MTX during the study were excluded from analyses. Seventeen patients (63.0%) experienced flares in the MTX group, which was significantly reduced in the BUC + MTX group (31.8%; p = 0.045). Further, the flare rates differed significantly between remission and non-remission by a Boolean definition upon IFX discontinuation in the MTX group (40.0% vs. 91.7%, respectively; p = 0.014), but they were comparable in the BUC + MTX group. BUC treatment was interrupted in seven patients due to rash, proteinuria and incompliance. CONCLUSIONS: DMARDs combination therapy may be a better treatment strategy than MTX monotherapy for maintaining RA control after successful discontinuation of biological agents.

Effect of interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor, tocilizumab, in preventing joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis showing inadequate response to TNF inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of tocilizumab (TCZ) in preventing joint destruction in patients with inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNF-IR) by assessing X-rays. METHODS: RA patients were extracted from the Retrospective actemra investigation for optimal needs of RA patients (REACTION) study. Parameters and components of disease activity were evaluated during anti-TNF treatment and during TCZ treatment. X-ray images of hands and feet at the beginning of this study during anti-TNF treatment (Pre), at the start point of TCZ treatment (Baseline) and after TCZ treatment (Post) were collected for assessing joint destruction. RESULTS: Forty-five patients from the REACTION study fulfilled the criteria of clinical TNF-IR. During anti-TNF treatment, mean DAS28-ESR rose from 5.35 to 5.87 (mean observation duration, 16 months) but improved significantly to 2.94 (P < 0.0001) at 52 weeks after switching to TCZ. Mean change in van der Heijde-modified Sharp score (TSS) during anti-TNF treatment was 3.17 in this TNF-IR population. After switching to TCZ, mean change in TSS was 1.20 (P < 0.05). Rate of radiographic non-progression improved to 66.7% during TCZ treatment from 40.0% during anti-TNF treatment. The predictive factor for no radiographic progression after switching to TCZ was a HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI) score of ≤ 1.88 at switching to TCZ. CONCLUSION: TCZ was a good treatment option for improving signs and symptoms and inhibiting progression of joint damage in patients with clinical and structural TNF-IR.

A comparison of incidence and risk factors for serious adverse events in rheumatoid arthritis patients with etanercept or adalimumab in Korea and Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence and risk factors of serious adverse events (SAEs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with etanercept (ETN) or adalimumab (ADA) between Korean and Japanese registries. METHODS: We recruited 416 RA patients [505.2 patient-years (PYs)] who started ETN or ADA from Korean registry and 537 RA patients (762.0 PY) from Japanese registry. The patient background, incidence rate (IR) of SAE in 2 years, and risk factors for SAEs were compared. RESULTS: Korean patients were younger and used more nonbiologic DMARDs, higher doses of methotrexate, and lower doses of prednisolone (PSL). The IR of SAEs (/100 PY) was higher in the Japanese registry compared to the Korean [13.65 vs. 6.73]. In both registries, infection was the most frequently reported SAE. The only significant risk factor for SAEs in Korean registry was age by decade [1.45]. In Japanese registry, age by decade [1.54], previous use of nonbiologic DMARDs ≥ 4 [1.93], and concomitant use of oral PSL ≥ 5 mg/day [2.20] were identified as risk factors for SAEs. CONCLUSIONS: The IR of SAE in Japan, especially infection, was higher than that of Korea, which was attributed to the difference of demographic and clinical characteristics of RA patients and treatment profiles.

Successful treatment of class IV+V lupus nephritis with combination therapy of high-dose corticosteroids, tacrolimus and intravenous cyclophosphamide.

A substantial number of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) are refractory to conventional glucocorticoid (GC) treatment. Although many of these patients respond to immunosuppressive drugs such as intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY), azathioprine (AZA), mizoribine, tacrolimus, cyclosporine A (CSA) and mycofenolate mofetil (MMF), some remain refractory to such therapies. Recent studies of multi-target therapies have reported effective outcomes for immunosuppression following renal transplantation and refractory LN when therapy consists of two or more immunosuppressive drugs with different mechanisms of action. We herein report a case of LN unresponsive to IVCY that was successfully treated with the addition of tacrolimus and discuss the usefulness of multi-target therapy for LN.

Efficacy of weekly mizoribine pulse therapy in refractory lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the efficacy of a high-dose intermittent dosing treatment method (weekly mizoribine pulse therapy) conceived in the hope of achieving better efficacy by increasing the peak blood levels of mizoribine in patients with refractory lupus nephritis. METHODS: Seventeen patients with lupus nephritis who had been resistant to corticosteroid and immunosuppressant therapy received weekly mizoribine pulse therapy. Mizoribine (350 mg) was administered three times at 12 h intervals over 2 consecutive days (700 mg for day 1 and 350 mg for day 2), followed by a washout period from day 3 to day 7. RESULTS: This therapeutic strategy enabled the peak blood levels of mizoribine to be increased to more than 3 µg/mL in most of the patients. Although SLEDAI, anti-ds-DNA antibody titer, CH-50, and serum albumin level did not significantly improve, urinary protein levels decreased, and it was possible to taper the dose of concomitant steroids. Using our definition of clinical response, 10 of the 17 patients were responders and 4 of them were nonresponders. The average peak serum mizoribine concentration of the responders was as high as 3.5 µg/mL. Elevation of serum liver enzymes was seen in 1 patient, and hyperuricemia occurred in 4 cases, but none of these adverse events were serious. CONCLUSION: Intermittent administration of mizoribine can increase blood levels and may be effective for refractory lupus nephritis.

A retrospective study of serum KL-6 levels during treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a report from the Ad Hoc Committee for Safety of Biological DMARDs of the Japan College of Rheumatology.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated associations between treatment with methotrexate (MTX) or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and elevation of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Using a standardized form, data were collected retrospectively from medical records and analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Of a total of 198 RA patients with KL-6 serum levels measured at initiation of treatment (month 0) and two or more times by month 12, 27 (17.9 %) of 151 RA patients treated with biological DMARDs, including infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and tocilizumab (the biological DMARDs group), and 5 (10.6 %) of 47 patients treated without biological DMARDs but with MTX (MTX group), met criterion B (max. KL-6 ≥500 U/ml and >1.5-fold from baseline) by 12 months. The majority of patients (n = 28) meeting criterion B had no apparent interstitial lung disease or malignancy. Of these 28 patients, 21 had serum KL-6 levels available after reaching their maximum level, and 13 (61.9 %) of the 21 then met criterion R [decrease to less than 500 U/ml or to less than (baseline + 0.5 × (maximum - baseline))] by month 12. CONCLUSION: Serum KL-6 levels may increase during treatment with MTX or these biological DMARDs without significant clinical events.

Elevation of KL-6 serum levels in clinical trials of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a report from the Japan College of Rheumatology Ad Hoc Committee for Safety of Biological DMARDs.

OBJECTIVE: The associations between elevated levels of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors were investigated in five Japanese clinical trials. METHODS: Percentages and incidence rates were calculated for elevated serum KL-6 levels. Adverse events associated with elevated levels of serum KL-6 were investigated. RESULTS: In RISING, a clinical trial for infliximab, 15.6 % of the enrolled patients met criterion B (KL-6 ≥500 U/ml and >1.5-fold increase over the baseline value) by week 54. In HIKARI, 7.8 % of the certolizumab pegol (CZP) group and 0 % of the placebo group met criterion B during the double-blind (DB) period (p = 0.003). In J-RAPID, 8.4 % of the methotrexate (MTX) + CZP and 3.9 % of the MTX + placebo groups met criterion B during the DB period. In GO-MONO, 1.8 % of the golimumab (GLM) and 1.3 % of the placebo groups met criterion B during the DB period. In GO-FORTH, 7.1 % of the MTX + GLM and 0 % of the MTX + placebo groups met criteron B during the DB period (p = 0.017). No adverse events accompanied the elevation of serum KL-6 levels in 95.7 % of these patients. CONCLUSION: Serum KL-6 levels may increase during anti-TNF therapy without significant clinical events. In these patients, continuing treatment with TNF inhibitors under careful observation is a reasonable option.

Clinical significance of cartilage biomarkers for monitoring structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with anti-TNF therapy.

PURPOSE: With the current use of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there is a need to monitor ongoing structural joint damage due to the dissociation of articular cartilage damage from disease activity of RA. This study longitudinally analyzed levels of serum cartilage biomarkers during 54 weeks of infliximab therapy, to evaluate the feasibility of biomarkers for monitoring structural joint damage. METHODS: Subjects comprised 33 patients with early RA and 33 patients with established RA. All patients received 3 mg/kg of infliximab and methotrexate for 54 weeks. Levels of the following serum cartilage markers were measured at baseline and at weeks 14, 22, and 54: hyaluronan (HA); cartilage oligometric matrix protein (COMP); type II collagen (CII)-related neoepitope (C2C); type II procollagen carboxy-propeptide (CPII); and keratin sulfate (KS). Time courses for each biomarker were assessed, and relationships between these biomarkers and clinical or radiographic parameters generally used for RA were investigated. RESULTS: Levels of CRP, MMP-3, DAS28-CRP, and annual progression of TSS were improved to similar degrees in both groups at week 54. HA and C2C/CPII were significantly decreased compared to baseline in the early RA group (p<0.001), whereas HA and COMP, but not C2C/CPII, were decreased in the established RA group. Strikingly, serum C2C/CPII levels were universally improved in early RA, regardless of EULAR response grade. Both ΔHA and ΔC2C/CPII from baseline to week 54 correlated significantly with not only ΔCRP, but also ΔDAS28 in early RA. Interestingly, when partial correlation coefficients were calculated by standardizing CRP levels, the significant correlation of ΔHA to ΔDAS28 disappeared, whereas correlations of ΔC2C/CPII to ΔDAS28, ΔJNS, and ΔHAQ remained significant. These results suggest a role of ΔC2C/CPII as a marker of ongoing structural joint damage with the least association with CRP, and that irreversible cartilage damage in established RA limits restoration of the C2C/CPII level, even with tight control of joint inflammation. CONCLUSION: The temporal course of C2C/CPII level during anti-TNF therapy indicates that CII turnover shifts toward CII synthesis in early RA, but not in established RA, potentially due to irreversible cartilage damage. ΔC2C/CPII appears to offer a useful marker reflecting ongoing structural joint damage, dissociated from inflammatory indices such as CRP and MMP-3.

A case of multiple giant coronary aneurysms and abdominal aortic aneurysm coexisting with IgG4-related disease.

IgG4-related disease (IgG4RD) is a unique systemic lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by elevated serum IgG4 levels and IgG4-producing plasma cell expansion in the affected tissues, which are accompanied by fibrotic or sclerotic changes. Vascular lesions may also be a part of IgG4RD as a number of case reports have discussed inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms associated with IgG4RD, but coronary artery lesions seem to be rare complications of IgG4RD. A 71-year-old man suffered from multiple giant coronary aneurysms and an abdominal aortic aneurysm with concurrent pancreatic, gall bladder, bile duct, and salivary gland lesions resulting from IgG4RD. The present observations suggest that coronary aneurysms may also develop as a consequence of this disease.