Dear Program Director: An Evaluation of Implicit Bias in Letters of Recommendation for Neurosurgery Residency.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite comprising half of medical students, women represent only 29.6% of neurosurgery applicants and 17% of residents, suggesting a "leak" in the career pipeline for women neurosurgeons. Surveys persistently show that neurosurgery programs identify United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE®) Step 1 score and letters of recommendation (LORs) as the most important factors in selecting applicants to interview. A previous study in neurosurgery found no differences in LORs. However, multiple studies in other specialties have demonstrated implicit gender bias in LORs, which may influence resident selection. Our objective is to evaluate neurosurgery residency LORs for evidence of implicit gender bias. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of LORs for interviewed neurosurgery applicants at a single institution during the 2014 to 2020 National Residency Matching Program (NRMP®) match cycles. Letters were evaluated using Linguistic Inquiry & Word Count (LIWC) software (Pennebaker Conglomerates), and additional applicant data were obtained from candidate applications. LIWC (Pennebaker Conglomerates) output data included custom dictionary categories and terms that were analyzed using Prism 10 and Rstudio. RESULTS: Two hundred eighteen applications were reviewed for a total of 827 letters. LIWC (Pennebaker Conglomerates) analysis showed significant differences in word count (331 vs 297, difference = 34, 95% CI: 9-61, P = .008). LORs for applicants who were men were more likely to mention Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society (1.17 vs 0.778, difference = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.13-0.67, P = .023). USMLE® Step 1 scores were significantly lower for women (241 vs 247, difference = 6, 95% CI: 2-10, P = .004). There was no significant difference between letters for men and women for all categories evaluated in the linguistic evaluation. CONCLUSION: LORs are vital to the neurosurgical residency application process. The data exhibit some differences between the men and women applicants but few differences in their LORs, consistent with the results of the previous neurosurgical study.

Critical Care Echocardiography.

Ultrasonography is increasingly applied in the critical care setting. With advancements in technology, ultrasonography has become easier to use, with smaller machines, and more fundamental to patient assessment. Ultrasonography is a hands-on tool that brings real-time, dynamic information to the bedside. Patients in the critical care setting often have unstable hemodynamics or a tenuous respiratory status; thus, the use of ultrasonography to augment the assessment greatly improves patient safety. This article explores how to differentiate the etiology of shock with the adjunct of critical care echocardiography. In addition, the article examines how various ultrasonography techniques can be used to diagnose other life-threatening cardiac conditions, such as pulmonary embolism or cardiac tamponade, and the role of echocardiography in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Critical care providers can add echocardiography and the information it provides to their repertoire to improve diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes.

Gender differences in cardiothoracic surgery letters of recommendation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether or not gender influences letters of recommendation for cardiothoracic surgery fellowship. METHODS: From applications to an Accreditation Council Graduate Medical Education cardiothoracic surgery fellowship program between 2016 and 2021, applicant and author characteristics were examined with descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and Pearson χ2 tests. Linguistic software was used to assess communication differences in letters of recommendation, stratified by author and applicant gender. An additional higher-level analysis was then performed using a generalized estimating equations model to examine linguistic differences among author-applicant gender pairs. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-nine recommendation letters extracted from 196 individual applications were analyzed; 90% (n = 665) of authors were men and 55.8% (n = 412) of authors were cardiothoracic surgeons. Compared with women authors, authors who are men wrote more authentic (P = .01) and informal (P = .03) recommendation letters. When writing for women applicants, authors who are men were more likely to display their own leadership and status (P = .03) and discuss women applicants' social affiliations (P = .01), like occupation of applicant's father or husband. Women authors wrote longer letters (P = .03) and discussed applicants' work (P = .01) more often than authors who are men. They also mentioned leisure activities (P = .03) more often when writing for women applicants. CONCLUSIONS: Our work identifies gender-specific differences in letters of recommendation. Women applicants may be disadvantaged because their recommendation letters are significantly more likely to focus on their social ties, leisure activities, and the status of the letter writer. Author and reviewer awareness of gender-biased use of language will aid in improvements to the candidate selection process.

Controller size matters: User proficiency is affected by endoscopic controller size.

BACKGROUND: Endoscope controllers are traditionally a one-size-fits-all design. However, this design may not fit the modern workforce in endoscopy-related fields. Our study aims to determine if endoscopic controller size, independent of user dexterity, affects user proficiency. METHODS: 54 endoscopically naive participants completed a baseline dexterity test, followed by large-controller endoscopic and small-controller bronchoscopic simulation exercises. Participants were stratified by surgical glove size (≥7.5 and < 7.5) and gender. RESULTS: Endoscopy time was longer in participants with <7.5 size gloves (p = 0.01) and in females (p < 0.001). However, participants with glove size <7.5 had better dexterity measures (p = 0.04). There was no difference in bronchoscopy time based on glove size (p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Participants with larger hands were more proficient with the larger controller despite being less dexterous than their counterparts. This advantage was less pronounced with the smaller controller. Our findings suggest that endoscopic controllers should be modified in design to accommodate all providers.

Comparing learning retention in medical students using mixed-reality to supplement dissection: a preliminary study.

Objectives: To evaluate student impressions of learning anatomy with mixed-reality and compare long-term information retention of female breast anatomy between students who learned with a mixed-reality supplement and their classmates who dissected cadavers. Methods: In Part 1, 38 first-year medical student volunteers, randomly divided into two groups, completed a mixed-reality module and cadaveric dissection on the female breast in a counterbalanced design. Participants also completed post-quizzes and surveys. Part 2 was a non-randomized controlled trial, 8-months after completing Part 1 and 6-months after a final exam on this content. The performance of twenty-two Part 1 participants and 129 of their classmates, who only dissected, was compared on a delayed post-quiz. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and 95% confidence intervals were used to analyze the data. Results: In Part 1, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test determined that participants expressed significantly more positive responses to mixed-reality and found mixed-reality easier for learning and teamwork. In Part 2, the Mann-Whitney U test found mixed-reality participants scored significantly higher on a delayed-post quiz than their classmates who only dissected (U = 928, p < .009). Conclusions:   This study suggests that medical students may prefer mixed-reality and that it may be an effective modality for learning breast anatomy while facilitating teamwork. Results also suggest that supplementing cadaveric dissection with mixed-reality may improve long-term retention for at least one anatomical topic. It is recommended that similar studies evaluate a larger sample and additional anatomical regions to determine the generalizability of these findings.

It's Not About the Money: Continued Treatment and Survival Outcome Disparities in Minority Rectal Cancer Patients After Controlling for Socioeconomic Factors.

BACKGROUND: While the disparities for minority patients with cancer have been well established, few studies have illustrated disparities in cancer outcomes while controlling for potential confounding factors. The current study was designed to address these confounding variables and how they influence the treatment and survival time for patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, black and Hispanic patients were compared with white patients with rectal cancer for the rates of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery in addition to survival time after diagnosis. Following this analysis, confounding variables were controlled for and analysis was repeated with groups of comparable demographic variables. RESULTS: Before controlling for confounding variables, there were significant differences in treatment and survival for both Hispanic and black patients compared with white. Following matching, black patients continued to have lower rates of treatment and shorter survival times. CONCLUSIONS: These differences in treatment methods and survival outcomes for minorities, particularly black patients, highlight the need for more advocacy and focus on these underrepresented populations with rectal cancer.

Procedural-based Specialties Benefit from a Formal Informed Consent and Disclosures Educational Program.

OBJECTIVE: At our tertiary academic center, residents undergo formalized training in obtaining informed consent and disclosing a complication. The informed consent portion has previously been shown to benefit a group of surgical and emergency medicine residents. We aimed to determine if the benefits from training persist across a larger number of procedural-based specialties and to ascertain the benefit of training in disclosing complications. DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study examined first-year residents from seven procedural-based specialties who participated in a formal informed consent and disclosures training program, consisting of a didactic lecture and two-part simulation. Two years after the start of the program, the disclosure scenario was added. Participants were given pre- and post-surveys assessing comfort and confidence in the informed consent and disclosure scenarios. Survey results were compared using the signed-rank test and Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate. SETTING: This study occurred at Temple University Hospital, a tertiary academic institution in Philadelphia, PA. PARTICIPANTS: First-year residents from 2014 to 2020 in seven procedural-based specialties, including general surgery, orthopedic surgery, otolaryngology, obstetrics and gynecology, emergency medicine, radiology, and anesthesia, participated in this study. One hundred and ninety-three residents completed the program and surveys. RESULTS: Residents reported improved confidence in filling out an informed consent form (p = 0.036) and more comfortable in obtaining informed consent (p = 0.041), as well as more confidence (p = 0.018) and comfort (p = 0.001) in disclosing a complication. Surgical residents demonstrated greater confidence in obtaining informed consent (p = 0.009) and disclosing a complication (p = 0.0002) after training than non-surgical residents. CONCLUSIONS: Across multiple procedural-based specialties, formal training in informed consent and disclosure of complications increases resident ability to perform these tasks. A formal training program is valuable for residents who are expected to perform these tasks across various specialties.

Social Disparities in Lung Cancer Risk and Screening.

Significant disparities exist in lung cancer incidence and screening. Geographic, racial, gender, and socioeconomic disparities affect lung cancer incidence. As the leading cause of lung cancer, smoking varies among different racioethnic groups, genders, and socioeconomic statuses. In addition, environmental pollutants, such as radon, industrial toxins, and air pollution, are significant risk factors for lung cancer development that is disproportionately seen in working-class communities, as well as underserved and disabled populations. Lung cancer incidence depends on diagnosis. Literature examining lung cancer incidence and screening disparities have its limitations, as most studies are methodologically limited and do not adjust for important risk factors.

Recurrence and Progression of Head and Neck Paragangliomas after Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the recurrence of head and neck paragangliomas and the factors associated with disease progression after treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In total, 173 adults with 189 paragangliomas (41.3% carotid body, 29.1% glomus jugulare, 19.0% glomus tympanicum, and 10.6% glomus vagale) treated between 1990 and 2010 were evaluated to determine the incidence and risk of recurrence using Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: The mean (SD) follow-up duration was 8.6 (9.1) years. The incidence was 2.92 recurrences per 100 person-years. The rate of recurrence was 8.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-12.7) after 4 years and 17.1% (95% CI, 10.2-24.0) after 10 years. Glomus jugulare tumors were more likely to recur (hazard ratio [HR], 3.69; 95% CI, 1.70-8.01; P < .001) while carotid body tumors were less likely (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.97; P = .041). Radiation had a lower risk of recurrence or progression compared to surgical excision (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-.94; P = .040). Recurrence was associated with right-sided paragangliomas (HR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.63-7.75; P = .001). The median time to recurrence was 18.4 years. Six (3.2%) patients developed metastasis, which was more common with local recurrence (9.5% vs 1.4%, P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence is more common with glomus jugulare tumors and less common with carotid body tumors. Radiation may have a lower risk of recurrence or progression than surgery for some paraganglioma types. Metastasis is rare but more likely with recurrent disease. Surveillance neck imaging is recommended every several years for decades after treatment.

Second primary tumors in patients with a head and neck paraganglioma.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting recommendations and possibly overuse of imaging for surveillance of second primary tumors for patients with a history of head and neck paraganglioma. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 234 adults with head and neck paragangliomas (1990-2010) followed for a mean of 7.5 ± 8.4 years. RESULTS: The rate of second paraganglioma was 1.7% after 5 years and 5.1% after 10 years, yielding an incidence of 6.65 per 1000 person-years. Only 1.3% of patients (2.59 per 1000 person-years) ever had a second paraganglioma in the chest, abdomen, or pelvis. Patients with a hereditary paraganglioma (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52-15.43) or carotid body tumor (HR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.15-10.99) were at greater risk. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate of a second primary paragangliomas is low but increases with hereditary disease. These results question the utility of repeated imaging outside of the neck to screen for second paragangliomas.

Measurement of DNA concentration as a normalization strategy for metabolomic data from adherent cell lines.

Metabolomics is a rapidly advancing field, and much of our understanding of the subject has come from research on cell lines. However, the results and interpretation of such studies depend on appropriate normalization of the data; ineffective or poorly chosen normalization methods can lead to frankly erroneous conclusions. That is a recurrent challenge because robust, reliable methods for normalization of data from cells have not been established. In this study, we have compared several methods for normalization of metabolomic data from cell extracts. Total protein concentration, cell count, and DNA concentration exhibited strong linear correlations with seeded cell number, but DNA concentration was found to be the most generally useful method for the following reasons: (1) DNA concentration showed the greatest consistency across a range of cell numbers; (2) DNA concentration was the closest to proportional with cell number; (3) DNA samples could be collected from the same dish as the metabolites; and (4) cell lines that grew in clumps were difficult to count accurately. We therefore conclude that DNA concentration is a widely applicable method for normalizing metabolomic data from adherent cell lines.