ABSTRACT
Background: Child maltreatment is associated with a higher probability of mental disorders and suicidal behavior in adolescence. Therefore, accurate psychometric instruments are essential to assess this. Objective: To validate the Spanish version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF) in adolescents with suicide attempts. Methods: Multisite cohort study of 208 adolescents with suicide attempts using data from the following scales: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and CTQ-SF. Statistical analysis: CTQ-SF scores analyzed by descriptive statistics. Internal consistency: McDonald's omega and Cronbach's alpha. Concurrent validity with PHQ-9 and C-SSRS scores: Spearman correlation coefficient. Structural validity: Confirmatory factor analysis. Results: Floor and ceiling effects: Physical abuse and neglect as well as sexual abuse demonstrated high floor effects (50.0, 35.1, and 61.1% of adolescents, respectively). No ceiling effects were found. The CTQ-SF had excellent internal consistency (McDonald's omega = 0.94), as did the majority of its subscales (Cronbach's alpha 0.925-0.831) except for physical neglect (0.624). Its concurrent validity was modest, and the emotional neglect subscale had the lowest Spearman correlation coefficients (0.067-0.244). Confirmatory factor analysis: Compared with alternative factor structures, the original CTQ-SF model (correlated 5-factor) exhibited a better fit [S-B χ 2 = 676.653, p < 0; RMSEA (90% CI = 0.076-0.097) = 0.087; SRMR = 0.078; CFI = 0.980; TLI = 0.978]. Conclusion: The Spanish CTQ-SF is a reliable, valid instrument for assessing traumatic experiences in adolescents at high risk of suicide. It appears appropriate for use in routine clinical practice to monitor maltreatment in this group.
ABSTRACT
Background: Cognitive impairment is a widespread feature of schizophrenia, affecting nearly 80 % of patients. Prior research has linked the anticholinergic burden of psychiatric medications to these cognitive deficits. However, the impact of the anticholinergic burden from medications for physical morbidity remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the anticholinergic burden of psychiatric and physical medications in patients with schizophrenia and assess its impact on cognitive function. Methods: A total of 178 patients with schizophrenia were recruited. The assessments included an ad hoc questionnaire for collecting demographic and clinical data. Anticholinergic burden was evaluated using the cumulative Drug Burden Index (cDBI) for each participant, and cognitive function was assessed using MATRICS. Psychopathology was measured using the PANSS, CDSS, CAINS, and the CGI-S. Statistical analysis included Student's t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regressions. Results: The average cDBI was 1.3 (SD = 0.9). The model developed explained 40.80 % of the variance. The variable with the greatest weight was the cDBI (B = -11.148, p = 0.010). Negative-expression (B = -2.740, p = 0.011) and negative-experiential (B = -1.175, p = 0.030) symptoms were also associated with lower global cognitive score. However, more years of education (B = 5.140, p < 0.001) and cigarettes per day (B = 1.331, p < 0.001) predicted a better global cognitive score. Conclusion: This study identified specific predictors of global cognition in schizophrenia, with anticholinergic burden emerging as the strongest factor. Our findings underscore the importance of considering the anticholinergic burden of treatments, in addition to negative symptoms, when designing interventions to optimize or maintain cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: One of the challenges of psychiatry is the staging of patients, especially those with severe mental disorders. Therefore, we aim to develop an empirical staging model for schizophrenia. METHODS: Data were obtained from 212 stable outpatients with schizophrenia: demographic, clinical, psychometric (PANSS, CAINS, CDSS, OSQ, CGI-S, PSP, MATRICS), inflammatory peripheral blood markers (C-reactive protein, interleukins-1RA and 6, and platelet/lymphocyte [PLR], neutrophil/lymphocyte [NLR], and monocyte/lymphocyte [MLR] ratios). We used machine learning techniques to develop the model (genetic algorithms, support vector machines) and applied a fitness function to measure the model's accuracy (% agreement between patient classification of our model and the CGI-S). RESULTS: Our model includes 12 variables from 5 dimensions: 1) psychopathology: positive, negative, depressive, general psychopathology symptoms; 2) clinical features: number of hospitalizations; 3) cognition: processing speed, visual learning, social cognition; 4) biomarkers: PLR, NLR, MLR; and 5) functioning: PSP total score. Accuracy was 62% (SD = 5.3), and sensitivity values were appropriate for mild, moderate, and marked severity (from 0.62106 to 0.6728). DISCUSSION: We present a multidimensional, accessible, and easy-to-apply model that goes beyond simply categorizing patients according to CGI-S score. It provides clinicians with a multifaceted patient profile that facilitates the design of personalized intervention plans.
Subject(s)
Schizophrenia , Humans , Schizophrenia/classification , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Schizophrenia/blood , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Internet , Severity of Illness Index , Machine Learning , Biomarkers/blood , Psychometrics , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standardsSubject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Substance-Related Disorders , Permeability , Intestinal Absorption , Intestinal Diseases , Schizophrenia/physiopathologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Bipolar disorder (BD) has been reconceptualised as a progressive disorder that develops from mild to severe presentations. An empirical staging model - the Empirically Developed Clinical Staging Model for BD (EmDe-5) - was developed in a previous study. This study aims to further validate that model using a larger and more representative Spanish sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 183 BD outpatients were recruited at 11 sites in Spain. Assessment included clinical characteristics of the BD (number of hospitalisations, number of suicide attempts, comorbid personality disorders), physical health (BMI, metabolic syndrome, number of physical illnesses), cognition (SCIP), functioning (permanently disabled due to BD, FAST), and quality of life (SF-36). The CGI-S, VAS-S, and psychopharmacological treatment pattern were used as external validators. RESULTS: Ten patients (51.5%) were classified as stage 1, 33 (18%) as stage 2, 93 (508%) as stage 3, 37 (202%) as stage 4, and 10 (55%) as stage 5. All profilers, other than number of suicide attempts (p=0.311) and comorbid personality disorder (p=0.061), exhibited worse scores from stage 1 to 5. As expected, VAS-S and CGI-S scores were worse in the later stages. Regarding treatment, early stages (1-2) were associated with the use of one to three drugs while late stages (4-5) were associated with four or more drugs (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the EmDe-5 staging model's construct validity. The ease of obtaining the profilers, together with the operational criteria provided to quantify them, will facilitate the use of the EmDe-5 staging model in daily clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
Background: Since research in schizophrenia mainly focuses on deficits and risk factors, we need studies searching for high-functioning protective factors. Thus, our objective was to identify protective (PFs) and risk factors (RFs) separately associated with high (HF) and low functioning (LF) in patients with schizophrenia. Methods: We collected information (sociodemographic, clinical, psychopathological, cognitive, and functional) from 212 outpatients with schizophrenia. Patients were classified according to their functional level (PSP) as HF (PSP > 70, n = 30) and LF (PSP ≤ 50, n = 95). Statistical analysis consisted of Chi-square test, Student's t-test, and logistic regression. Results: HF model: variance explained: 38.4-68.8%; PF: years of education (OR = 1.227). RFs: receiving a mental disability benefit (OR = 0.062) and scores on positive (OR = 0.719), negative-expression (OR = 0.711), and negative-experiential symptoms (OR = 0.822), and verbal learning (OR = 0.866). LF model: variance explained: 42.0-56.2%; PF: none; RFs: not working (OR = 6.900), number of antipsychotics (OR = 1.910), and scores on depressive (OR = 1.212) and negative-experiential symptoms (OR = 1.167). Conclusion: We identified specific protective and risk factors for high and low functioning in patients with schizophrenia and confirmed that high functioning factors are not necessarily the opposite of those associated with low functioning. Only negative experiential symptoms are a shared and inverse factor for high and low functioning. Mental health teams must be aware of protective and risk factors and try to enhance or reduce them, respectively, to help their patients improve or maintain their level of functioning.
ABSTRACT
The early psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown is greater in people with mental disorders. This study explored the differences in the psychological impact on people with an anxiety disorder by sex in Spain.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Female , Male , Pandemics , Sex Characteristics , Anxiety/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Communicable Disease Control , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , DepressionABSTRACT
Introducción. El impacto psicológico en las etapas iniciales de la pandemia por COVID-19 y el confinamiento fue mayor en personas con trastornos mentales. En este estudio se exploraron las diferencias en el impacto psicológico según el sexo en personas con trastorno de ansiedad en España. Metodología. Estudio transversal, descriptivo y comparativo de los datos aportados por los participantes en una encuesta online anónima realizada entre el 19 y el 26 de marzo de 2020. El cuestionario ad hoc incluyó datos sociodemográficos, clínicos y variables relacionadas con COVID-19,junto con preguntas sobre estrategias de afrontamiento y las versiones en español de la Escala de Escalas de Depresión Ansiedad Estrés (DASS-21) y la Escala de Impacto del Estresor(IES). Se utilizaron análisis descriptivos bivariados y modelos de regresión logística. Resultados. De los 21.207 participantes, se analizaron1617 (7,6%) personas con trastorno de ansiedad autoinformado [1347 (83,3%) mujeres; 270 (16,7%) varones]. El impacto psicológico fue mayor en las mujeres que en los hombres con diferencias estadísticamente significativas en cada subescala del DASS-21 y subescalas del IES. Después de ajustar por posibles variables de confusión, se observó que ser mujer se asoció con puntuaciones más altas en las subescalas de pensamientos intrusivos y evitativos. Conclusiones. Nuestro estudio sugiere que las mujeres con trastorno de ansiedad son un grupo vulnerable a un mayor impacto negativo en la salud mental y, especialmente, en los síntomas relacionados con el trastorno de estrés postraumático. (AU)
Background. The early psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown is greater in peoplewith mental disorders. This study explored the differences in the psychological impact on people with an anxiety disorder by sex in Spain. Methods. Cross-sectional, descriptive, comparative study of the data provided by participants in an anonymous online survey between March 19 and 26, 2020. Thead hoc questionnaire included sociodemographic, clinical,and variable data related to COVID-19, along with questions about coping strategies, and the Spanish versions ofthe Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) andImpact of Event Scale (IES). Descriptive bivariate analyses and logistic regression models were used. Results. Of the 21,207 participants, 1617 (7.6%) people with self-reported anxiety disorder were analyzed [1347(83.3%) females; 270 (16.7%) males]. The psychological impact was greater on women than men with statistically significant differences in each subscale of the DASS-21and subscales of the IES. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, it was observed that being awoman was associated with higher scores on the intrusiveand avoidant thoughts subscales. Conclusions. Our study suggests that women with ananxiety disorder are a group vulnerable to a greater negative impact on mental health and, especially, symptomsr elated to post-traumatic stress disorder. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Psychosocial Impact , Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Sex Distribution , Spain , Cross-Sectional Studies , Epidemiology, Descriptive , PsychologyABSTRACT
The objective was to evaluate outcomes in a heroin-dependent population 35 years after first enrolment in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). An ad hoc protocol was used to assess drug misuse, treatment, and drug-related morbidity in the survivor sample. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. A total of 214 heroin-dependent patients entered MMT between 1982 and 1984 in the Asturias Public Health Service. Information was received on 195 subjects, of whom 146 were deceased. Men accounted for 77.5% of the study cohort. Over the 35-year follow-up period, the SMR was 11.75 (95% CI = 9.95 - 13.77). In the survivor sample, 5.7% were still enrolled in MMT; human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was diagnosed in 38.77% and hepatitis B/C in 73.46%. No differences were found between sexes in mortality or HIV and hepatitis B/C status. None of the female survivors were using heroin at the 35-year follow-up compared with 5.26% of males. In conclusion, our study confirms the high long-term mortality rate of heroin addicts, even after enrollment in MMT.
El objetivo fue evaluar el estado de una población dependiente a la heroína 35 años después de su primera inscripción en un tratamiento de mantenimiento con metadona (TMM). Se utilizó un protocolo ad hoc para evaluar morbilidad, consumo y tratamiento de la adicción en la muestra de supervivientes. Se calculó la razón de mortalidad estandarizada (RME) con un intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95%. Un total de 214 pacientes ingresaron en TMM entre 1982 y 1984 en el Servicio de Salud Pública de Asturias. Se recibió información sobre 195 sujetos, de los cuales 146 habían fallecido. Los hombres representaron el 77,5% de la cohorte del estudio. Durante el período de seguimiento de 35 años, la RME fue de 11,75 (IC 95% = 9,95 13,77). En la muestra de supervivientes, el 5,7% todavía estaba inscrito en TMM; el virus de inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) se diagnosticó en un 38,77% y la hepatitis B/C en un 73,46%; el consumo actual de heroína se informó en un 4,1%. No hubo diferencias de género en la mortalidad o la condición de VIH y hepatitis B/C. Ninguna de las mujeres consumía heroína en el seguimiento de 35 años en comparación con el 5,26% de los hombres. En conclusión, nuestro estudio confirma la alta tasa de mortalidad a largo plazo, incluso después de la inscripción en TMM.
Subject(s)
HIV Seropositivity , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis C , Heroin Dependence , Male , Humans , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Methadone/therapeutic use , Heroin/therapeutic use , Spain/epidemiology , Heroin Dependence/epidemiology , Heroin Dependence/drug therapy , HIV Seropositivity/drug therapy , Hepatitis B/drug therapy , Opiate Substitution TreatmentABSTRACT
El objetivo fue evaluar el estado de una población dependiente a la heroína 35 años después de su primera inscripción en un tratamiento de mantenimiento con metadona (TMM). Se utilizó un protocolo ad hoc para evaluar morbilidad, consumo y tratamiento de la adicción en la muestra de supervivientes. Se calculó la razón de mortalidad estandarizada (RME) con un intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95%. Un total de 214 pacientes ingresaron en TMM entre 1982 y 1984 en el Servicio de Salud Pública de Asturias. Se recibió información sobre 195 sujetos, de los cuales 146 habían fallecido. Los hombres representaron el 77,5% de la cohorte del estudio. Durante el período de seguimiento de 35 años, la RME fue de 11,75 (IC 95% = 9,95 13,77). En la muestra de supervivientes, el 5,7% todavía estaba inscrito en TMM; el virus de inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) se diagnosticó en un 38,77% y la hepatitis B/C en un 73,46%; el consumo actual de heroína se informó en un 4,1%. No hubo diferencias de género en la mortalidad o la condición de VIH y hepatitis B/C. Ninguna de las mujeres consumía heroína en el seguimiento de 35 años en comparación con el 5,26% de los hombres. En conclusión, nuestro estudio confirma la alta tasa de mortalidad a largo plazo, incluso después de la inscripción en TMM. (AU)
The objective was to evaluate outcomes in a heroin-dependent population 35 years after first enrolment in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). An ad hoc protocol was used to assess drug misuse, treatment, and drug-related morbidity in the survivor sample. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. A total of 214 heroin-dependent patients entered MMT between 1982 and 1984 in the Asturias Public Health Service. Information was received on 195 subjects, of whom 146 were deceased. Men accounted for 77.5% of the study cohort. Over the 35-year follow-up period, the SMR was 11.75 (95% CI = 9.95 13.77). In the survivor sample, 5.7% were still enrolled in MMT; human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was diagnosed in 38.77% and hepatitis B/C in 73.46%. No differences were found between sexes in mortality or HIV and hepatitis B/C status. None of the female survivors were using heroin at the 35-year follow-up compared with 5.26% of males. In conclusion, our study confirms the high long-term mortality rate of heroin addicts, even after enrollment in MMT. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Heroin Dependence/mortality , Heroin Dependence/rehabilitation , Heroin Dependence/therapy , Methadone/supply & distribution , Methadone/therapeutic use , Spain , Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Adherence and Compliance/psychologyABSTRACT
Background and objectives: Sleep and circadian disturbances have been widely studied in patients with bipolar disorder. However, there is no clear evidence about the role of peripheral biomarkers of the circadian cycle in this population. This systematic review aims to identify potential endocrine blood biomarkers of circadian rhythms and study their relationship with sleep problems in these patients.MethodsAn electronic search was performed of PubMed and PsycINFO databases. It included articles about the topic from 1991 through 2021. The search strategy was: ("peripheral biomarkers" OR "biological markers" OR biomarker OR cortisol OR melatonin OR orexin OR hypocretin) AND (blood OR serum OR plasma) AND (sleep-wake OR "circadian rhythm" OR sleep OR insomnia) AND "bipolar."ResultsAfter excluding duplicates, 92 records were obtained. Only 5 studies met the inclusion criteria (n=499; bipolar disorder=125; unipolar depression=148; schizophrenia=80; controls=146). The endocrine parameters analyzed were: cortisol (3 studies), melatonin (1 study), and orexin-A (1 study). Overall, no significant associations were detected between these biomarkers and sleep disturbances, assessed with subjective (psychometric evaluation) and/or objective (polysomnography) measures.ConclusionThis review highlights the lack of studies exploring the role of endocrine biomarkers related to circadian function in the pathophysiology of sleep disturbances in bipolar disorder. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Sleep , Circadian Rhythm , Sleep Wake Disorders , Bipolar Disorder , Hydrocortisone , MelatoninABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: A staging model is a clinical tool used to define the development of a disease over time. In schizophrenia, authors have proposed different theoretical staging models of increasing complexity. Therefore, the aims of our study were to provide an updated and critical view of the proposed clinical staging models for schizophrenia and to review the empirical data that support them. METHODS: Systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines. From the PubMed database and backward reference search, a total of 141 records were retrieved, but only 20 were selected according to the inclusion criteria: (a) available in English; (b) participants with schizophrenia ≥ 18 years; and (c) theoretical and empirical research studies intended to develop, validate, and/or improve staging models of schizophrenia. RESULTS: Different clinical staging models for schizophrenia were identified, information about the proposed stages was tabulated and presented in the Results section (Tables 1, 2). Most of which include neuroimaging, functioning, and psychopathology, but only two models add objective biomarkers and none include patient point of view. However, few models have been psychometrically tested or used small samples and thus have been validated only partially. In addition, five studies proposed therapeutic interventions according to the stage of the disorder from a theoretical point of view. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, it is possible to stage schizophrenia, but the models developed have several limitations. Empirical validation and inclusion of more specific biomarkers and measures of other life areas affected by schizophrenia could help in the development of more valid models.
Subject(s)
Schizophrenia , Humans , Schizophrenia/therapyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Apathy is a negative symptom of schizophrenia and is associated with poor real world functioning. Therefore, it is important to have validated psychometric instruments to assess this symptom. This is the first study to validate the Spanish adaptation of the self-rated version of the Apathy Assessment Scale (AES-S) in patients with schizophrenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Naturalistic, cross-sectional, validation study in 104 patients with schizophrenia evaluated using the following scales: Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS), Self-report of Negative Symptoms (SNS), Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and Apathy Evaluation Scale-self-rated version (AES-S). RESULTS: Reliability: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.908. Convergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between AES-S and CAINS-MAP total scores was -0.483 (p<0.001). For SNS, total and avolition subscale scores were -0.803 and -0.639 (p<0.001), respectively. With the MAP-SR, the correlation coefficient was -0.727 (p<0.001). Divergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between AES-S and PSP total scores was 0.504 (p<0.001). Furthermore, with the CDSS, the correlation coefficient was -0.431 (p<0.001). Discriminant validity: The AES-S discriminated between different levels of illness severity according to CGI-S scores. Factor analysis: A three-component solution explained 57.32% of the variance. Pearson correlations between coefficients were 1-2=0.265, 1-3=0.464, and 2-3=0.060. CONCLUSION: The Spanish AES-S is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing apathy in Spanish patients with schizophrenia. It seems to be appropriate for use in everyday clinical practice as a means of monitoring apathy in these patients.
Subject(s)
Apathy , Schizophrenia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Reproducibility of Results , Schizophrenia/diagnosisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Negative symptoms can be grouped into five domains: apathy/avolition, anhedonia, asociality, alogia, and affective flattening. There are few validate self-rated measures that assess these five dimensions. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) in Spanish patients with schizophrenia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, validation study in 104 outpatients with schizophrenia evaluated using the Spanish version of the following scales: Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), Motivation and Pleasure Scale - Self-Report (MAP-SR), 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS). RESULTS RELIABILITY: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.915. Convergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between MAP-SR and SNS Total scores was 0.660 (p<0.001). For PANSS-N, the correlation was 0.437 (p<0.005) and with the CAINS-Total was 0.478 (p<0.005). Divergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between SNS and PSP was r=-0.372 (p≤0.001), and with SF-36 Physical and Mental Summary Component scores were r=-0.213 (p=0.066) and r=-0.144 (p=0.219), respectively. Discriminant validity: SNS Total scores were significantly statistically different according to the severity of the negative symptomatology rated by the CGI-SCH negative scale (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The SNS is a reliable and valid instrument to self-rate the five domains of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia and seems to be appropriate for use in everyday clinical practice as a complementary measure to the evaluation performed by the clinician.
Subject(s)
Schizophrenia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnostic Self Evaluation , Humans , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Schizophrenia/diagnosisABSTRACT
Introduction:Negative symptoms can be grouped into five domains: apathy/avolition, anhedonia, asociality, alogia, and affective flattening. There are few validate self-rated measures that assess these five dimensions. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) in Spanish patients with schizophrenia.Material and methods:Cross-sectional, validation study in 104 outpatients with schizophrenia evaluated using the Spanish version of the following scales: Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), Motivation and Pleasure Scale Self-Report (MAP-SR), 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS).Results Reliability:Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.915. Convergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between MAP-SR and SNS Total scores was 0.660 (p<0.001). For PANSS-N, the correlation was 0.437 (p<0.005) and with the CAINS-Total was 0.478 (p<0.005). Divergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between SNS and PSP was r=−0.372 (p≤0.001), and with SF-36 Physical and Mental Summary Component scores were r=−0.213 (p=0.066) and r=−0.144 (p=0.219), respectively. Discriminant validity: SNS Total scores were significantly statistically different according to the severity of the negative symptomatology rated by the CGI-SCH negative scale (p<0.001). (AU)
Introducción:Los síntomas negativos pueden agruparse en 5 dominios: apatía/abulia, anhedonia, conductas asociales, afasia y aplanamiento afectivo. Existen pocas medidas validadas autocalificadas que evalúen estas 5 dimensiones. Por tanto, el objetivo de este estudio fue validar la herramienta Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS, Autoevaluación de síntomas negativos) en pacientes españoles esquizofrénicos.Material y métodos:Estudio transversal de validación en 104 pacientes esquizofrénicos externos, evaluados utilizando la versión española de las escalas siguientes: Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR), 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) y la SNS.Resultados: Respecto a la fiabilidad,la consistencia interna (α de Cronbach) fue de 0,915. En cuanto a validez convergente, el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson entre las puntuaciones totales de MAP-SR y SNS fue de 0,660 (p < 0,001). Para PANSS-N, la correlación fue de 0,437 (p < 0,005) y de 0,478 (p < 0,005) con CAINS-Total. Respecto a la validez divergente, el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson entre las puntuaciones SNS y PSP fue de r = 0,372 (p ≤ 0,001) y con las puntuaciones de SF-36 Physical and Mental Summary Component fueron de r = −0,213 (p = 0,066) y r = −0,144 (p = 0,219), respectivamente. En la validez discriminante, las puntuaciones totales de SNS fueron diferentes desde un punto de vista estadístico significativo, conforme a la gravedad de la sintomatología negativa calificada por la escala negativa CGI-SCH (p < 0,001). (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Schizophrenia , Psychic Symptoms , Aphasia , ApathyABSTRACT
Introduction: Apathy is a negative symptom of schizophrenia and is associated with poor real world functioning. Therefore, it is important to have validated psychometric instruments to assess this symptom. This is the first study to validate the Spanish adaptation of the self-rated version of the Apathy Assessment Scale (AES-S) in patients with schizophrenia.Materials and methods: Naturalistic, cross-sectional, validation study in 104 patients with schizophrenia evaluated using the following scales: Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS), Self-report of Negative Symptoms (SNS), Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and Apathy Evaluation Scale-self-rated version (AES-S).Results: Reliability: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.908. Convergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between AES-S and CAINS-MAP total scores was −0.483 (p<0.001). For SNS, total and avolition subscale scores were −0.803 and −0.639 (p<0.001), respectively. With the MAP-SR, the correlation coefficient was −0.727 (p<0.001). Divergent validity: The Pearson correlation coefficient between AES-S and PSP total scores was 0.504 (p<0.001). Furthermore, with the CDSS, the correlation coefficient was −0.431 (p<0.001). Discriminant validity: The AES-S discriminated between different levels of illness severity according to CGI-S scores. Factor analysis: A three-component solution explained 57.32% of the variance. Pearson correlations between coefficients were 12=0.265, 13=0.464, and 23=0.060. (AU)
Introducción: La apatía es un síntoma negativo de la esquizofrenia, y está asociada a un mal funcionamiento del mundo real. Por tanto, es importante disponer de instrumentos psicométricos validados para valorar este síntoma. Este es el primer estudio que valida la adaptación al español de la versión auto-evaluada de la escala de evaluación de la apatía (AES-S) en pacientes esquizofrénicos.Material y métodos: Estudio naturalista, transversal y de validación realizado en 104 pacientes esquizofrénicos evaluados utilizando las escalas siguientes: Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS), Self-report of Negative Symptoms (SNS), Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) y Apathy Evaluation Scale-self-rated version (AES-S).Resultados: Fiabilidad: La consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach) fue de 0,908. Validez convergente: El coeficiente de correlación de Pearson entre las puntuaciones totales de AES-S y CAINS-MAP fue de −0,483 (p<0,001). Para SNS, las puntaciones totales y de la subescala de abulia fueron de −0,803 y −0,639 (p<0,001), respectivamente. En cuanto a la escala MAP-SR, el coeficiente de correlación fue de −0,727 (p<0,001). Validez divergente: El coeficiente de correlación de Pearson entre las puntuaciones totales de AES-S y PSP fue de 0,504 (p<0,001). Además, en la escala CDSS, el coeficiente de correlación fue de −0,431 (p<0,001). Validez discriminante: La escala AES-S discriminó entre los diferentes niveles de gravedad de la enfermedad, conforme a las puntuaciones CGI-S. Análisis factorial: Una solución de tres componentes explicó el 57,32% de la varianza. Las correlaciones de Pearson entre los coeficientes fueron de 1-2=0,265, 1-3=0,464 y 2-3=0,060. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Schizophrenia , ApathyABSTRACT
Introduction: Interest in the idea of recovery for certain patients with schizophrenia has been growing over the last decade. Improving symptomatology and functioning is crucial for achieving this. Our study aims to identify those factors that substantially contribute to real-world functioning in these patients. Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional study in stable outpatients with schizophrenia on maintenance antipsychotic monotherapy. Patients: We studied 144 outpatients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR criteria) meeting the following criteria: (1) 18-65 years of age; (2) being clinically stable for at least the previous three months; (3) on maintenance antipsychotic monotherapy (prescriptions ≤ 10 mg olanzapine, ≤200 mg quetiapine, or ≤100 mg levomepromazine as hypnotics were also allowed); and (4) written informed consent. Assessment: We collected information on demographic and clinical variables by using an ad hoc questionnaire. For psychopathology, we employed the Spanish versions of the following psychometric instruments: the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS-Sp), and the Calgary Depression Scale (CDS). In addition, cognitive domains were assessed using the Verbal Fluency Test (VFT), the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and the Trail Making Test, parts A and B (TMT-A and TMT-B). Finally, we employed the Spanish versions of the University of California San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment (Sp-UPSA) and the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) for assessing functional capacity and real-world functioning, respectively. Statistical analysis: A forward stepwise regression was conducted by entering those variables significantly associated with PSP total score into the univariate analyses (Student's t-test, ANOVA with Duncan's post-hoc test, or bivariate Pearson correlation). Results: A total of 144 patients; mean age 40 years, 64% males, mean length of illness 12.4 years, PSP total score 54.3. The final model was a significant predictor of real-world functioning [F (7, 131) = 36.371, p < 0.001] and explained 66.0% of the variance. Variables retained in the model: BNSS-Sp abulia, asociality, and blunted affect, PANSS general psychopathology, Sp-UPSA transportation, TMT-B, and heart rate. Conclusion: Our model will contribute to a more efficient and personalized daily clinical practice by assigning specific interventions to each patient based on specific impaired factors in order to improve functioning.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To provide a population-based characterization of sociodemographic and clinical risk and protective factors associated with consumption of alcohol, tobacco, or both as a coping strategy in a sample of the Spanish general population during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Cross-sectional study based on an online snowball recruiting questionnaire. The survey consisted of an ad hoc questionnaire comprising clinical and sociodemographic information and the Spanish versions of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and the Impact of Event Scale (IES). RESULTS: The final sample included 21,207 individuals [mean age (SD) = 39.7 (14.0); females: 14,768 (69.6%)]. Up to 2867 (13.5%) of participants reported using alcohol, 2545 (12%) tobacco and 1384 (6.5%) both substances as a strategy to cope with the pandemic. Sex-related factors were associated with alcohol consumption as a coping strategy [female, OR = 0.600, p < 0.001]. However, education level, work status, and income played different roles depending on the substance used to cope. Having a current mental disorder was associated only with tobacco consumption as a coping strategy [OR = 1.391, p < 0.001]. Finally, sex differences were also identified. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological factors were associated with consumption of alcohol, tobacco, or both as a coping method for the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown. Our findings may help develop specific intervention programs reflecting sex differences, which could minimize negative long-term outcomes of substance use after this pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Adaptation, Psychological , Anxiety , Communicable Disease Control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression , Female , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tobacco Use/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Background: Depressed patients with early traumatic experiences may represent a clinically and biologically distinct subtype, with worse clinical outcomes and greater risk of suicide. Since early traumatic experiences alter development of systems that regulate the stress response, increasing sensitivity to stress and mood disorders later in life, certain personality features may influence coping strategies, putting individuals with depression and a history of early traumatic experiences at greater risk of suicidal behavior. Objective: To determine whether impulsivity mediates the relationship between early traumatic experiences and suicidal behavior in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: The total sample consists of 190 patients [mean age (SD) = 53.71 (10.37); females: 66.3%], with current MDD (DSM-5 criteria). The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF), the List of Threatening Experiences (LTE), and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11) were used to assess childhood and adulthood adverse life events and impulsivity, respectively. We developed mediation models by bootstrap sampling methods. Results: Eighty-one (42.6%) patients had a history of previous suicide attempts (SA). CTQ-SF-Total and BIS-11-Total scores were significantly higher in MDD patients with previous SA. Correlation analyses revealed significant correlations between the CTQ-SF-Total and BIS-11-Total, CTQ-SF-Total and HDRS-Total, and BIS-11-Total and HDRS-Total scores. Regression models found that CTQ-SF-Total, BIS-11-Total, and HDRS-Total scores were associated with SA. Mediation analyses further revealed the association between CTQ-SF-Total and SA was mediated by the indirect effect of the BIS-11-Total score (b = 0.007, 95% CI = 0.001, 0.015), after statistically controlling for sex, the HDRS-Total, and the LTE-Total. Discussion: Data suggest that impulsivity could mediate the influence of childhood trauma on suicidal behavior. This will help understand the role of risk factors in suicidal behavior and aid in the development of prevention interventions focused on modifiable mediators when risk factors are non-modifiable.