Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 762: 143057, 2021 Mar 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33162138

ABSTRACT

The feasibility of use microalgae biotechnology to improve water quality together with the production of biomass to replace fish meal or fish oil in two marine fish farms with different production systems were studied. The samples were taken from a flow-through system (FTS) and a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) with sea bass cultures of 300 g and 120 g, respectively. The most suitable stream for microalgae cultivation was that from RAS as the concentration of N in the microalgae reactor influent should be ≥8 mg TN L-1 to operate at the same hydraulic retention time than the solids retention time, independently of the productivity of the reactor. Tetraselmis chuii were cultured in 18 L bubble column reactors under batch and semi-continuous operation in media that mimic a RAS stream. The results showed that RAS systems enriched with trace metals generate viable streams for microalgae growth with average biomass productivity under semi-continuous operation of 69 mg TSS L-1 d-1. Nutrients concentrations at the end of the experiment under semi-continuous operation were 0.76 mg TDN L-1 and 0.01 mg TDP L-1, similar to those in the make-up water of the RAS. The composition of microalgae biomass obtained shows that it could be optimal as a substitute for fish meal in sea bass feed.


Subject(s)
Microalgae , Wastewater , Aquaculture , Biomass , Nitrogen/analysis , Nutrients
2.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 135: 607-616, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30301079

ABSTRACT

This is the first comprehensive study on the input, occurrence, and distribution of artificial sweeteners (ASs) in coastal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and their receiving coastal waters. Acesulfame (ACE), aspartame (ASP), cyclamate (CYC), saccharine (SAC), and sucralose (SUC) were monitored for 6 months in Cadiz Bay (SW Spain). ASP was always detected at <0.1 µg L-1 and removal efficiencies were >90% for SAC and CYC. Higher ACE removal efficiencies were observed during warmer months. Persistence of ACE and SUC was observed in both WWTPs and their receiving coastal surface waters, where values up to 0.6 and 3 µg L-1 were measured, respectively. The highest concentrations were measured in a sewage-impacted estuary located in the north of the bay, where conservative behavior was confirmed. The source specificity and recalcitrance of ACE and SUC make them suitable for being used as sewage-pollution markers in coastal environments.


Subject(s)
Sweetening Agents/analysis , Wastewater/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Aspartame/analysis , Bays , Environmental Monitoring , Sewage , Spain , Spatio-Temporal Analysis , Sucrose/analogs & derivatives , Sucrose/analysis , Waste Disposal, Fluid
3.
Water Res ; 139: 19-29, 2018 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29621714

ABSTRACT

Microalgae biotechnology is a promising tool for many applications, including the elimination of nutrients and other contaminants from wastewater. In this work, we measured the removal efficiency of two wastewater treatment processes: an activated-sludge based conventional process and another based on microalgae biotechnology using high-rate algae ponds (HRAPs). The latter was tested using two different configurations. In the first one, HRAPs were placed after an UASB reactor and used as a tertiary treatment to remove nutrients. In the second, the UASB reactor was disconnected so the HRAPs were directly fed with pretreated wastewater. Additional treatment was performed using dissolved air flotation (DAF). The performances of both configurations (UASB-HRAP and HRAP-DAF) were compared to that of the conventional line including primary and secondary biological treatments and operating in parallel within the same wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Sixty-four out of 81 target PhACs were detected in the influent of the WWTP, at an average concentration of 223 µg L-1, whereas 55 and 54 were measured in the conventional (14 µg L-1) and non-conventional (17 µg L-1) effluents. Average removal efficiencies were similar (94 vs. 92%) for both treatment lines when comparing total PhACs concentrations. The compositional patterns of the resulting effluents, however, were not, suggesting the occurrence of differential removal mechanisms depending on the chemicals and wastewater treatments considered. Highly consumed compounds such as ibuprofen and acetaminophen were predominant in the non-conventional effluent (>1 µg L-1), denoting lower removal than in the conventional line. On the other hand, elimination of diclofenac and some specific antibiotics and diuretics (e.g., hydrochlorothiazide) was between 15 and 50% higher using HRAPs. Overall, the efficiency of the microalgae technology removing PhACs was found to be comparable to that used in conventional WWTPs. This, combined with a higher efficiency removing nutrients, shows the potential of HRAP technology for wastewater treatment as an alternative (or addition as tertiary treatment) to more conventional approaches based on activated sludge.


Subject(s)
Microalgae/metabolism , Pharmaceutical Preparations/metabolism , Waste Disposal, Fluid/methods , Water Pollutants, Chemical/metabolism , Bioreactors , Cities , Ponds , Wastewater
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL