BPC 157, L-NAME, L-Arginine, NO-Relation, in the Suited Rat Ketamine Models Resembling "Negative-Like" Symptoms of Schizophrenia.

We attempted throughout the NO-system to achieve the particular counteraction of the ketamine-induced resembling "negative-like" schizophrenia symptoms in rats using pentadecapeptide BPC 157, and NO-agents, NG-nitro-L-arginine methylester (L-NAME), and/or L-arginine, triple application. This might be the find out the NO-system organized therapy (i.e., simultaneously implied NO-system blockade (L-NAME) vs. NO-system over-stimulation (L-arginine) vs. NO-system immobilization (L-NAME+L-arginine)). The ketamine regimen (intraperitoneally/kg) included: 3 mg (cognitive dysfunction, novel object recognition test), 30 mg (anxiogenic effect (open field test) and anhedonia (sucrose test)), and 8 mg/3 days (social withdrawal). Medication (mg/kg intraperitoneally) was L-NAME (5), L-arginine (100), and BPC 157 (0.01), alone and/or together, given immediately before ketamine (L-NAME, L-arginine, and combination) or given immediately after (BPC 157 and combinations). BPC 157 counteracted ketamine-cognition dysfunction, social withdrawal, and anhedonia, and exerted additional anxiolytic effect. L-NAME (antagonization, social withdrawal) and L-arginine (antagonization, cognitive dysfunction, anhedonia) both included worsening cognitive dysfunction, anhedonia, and anxiogenic effect (L-NAME), social withdrawal, and anxiogenic effect (L-arginine). Thus, ketamine-induced resembling "negative-like" schizophrenia symptoms were "L-NAME non-responsive, L-arginine responsive" (cognition dysfunction), "L-NAME responsive, L-arginine non-responsive" (social withdrawal), "L-NAME responsive, L-arginine responsive, opposite effect" (anhedonia) and "L-NAME responsive, L-arginine responsive, parallel effect" (both anxiogening). In cognition dysfunction, BPC 157 overwhelmed NO-agents effects. The mRNA expression studies in brain tissue evidenced considerable overlapping of gene overexpression in healthy rats treated with ketamine or BPC 157. With the BPC 157 therapy applied immediately after ketamine, the effect on Nos1, Nos2, Plcg1, Prkcg, and Ptgs2 (increased or decreased expression), appeared as a timely specific BPC 157 effect on ketamine-specific targets.

Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 counteracts L-NAME-induced catalepsy. BPC 157, L-NAME, L-arginine, NO-relation, in the suited rat acute and chronic models resembling 'positive-like' symptoms of schizophrenia.

In the suited rat-models, we focused on the stable pentadecapeptide BPC 157, L-NAME, NOS-inhibitor, and L-arginine, NOS-substrate, relation, the effect on schizophrenia-like symptoms. Medication (mg/kg intraperitoneally) was L-NAME (5), L-arginine (100), BPC 157 (0.01), given alone and/or together, at 5 min before the challenge for the acutely disturbed motor activity (dopamine-indirect/direct agonists (amphetamine (3.0), apomorphine (2.5)), NMDA-receptor non-competitive antagonist (MK-801 (0.2)), or catalepsy, (dopamine-receptor antagonist haloperidol (2.0)). Alternatively, BPC 157 10 µg/kg was given immediately after L-NAME 40 mg/kg intraperitoneally. To induce or prevent sensitization, we used chronic methamphetamine administration, alternating 3 days during the first 3 weeks, and challenge after next 4 weeks, and described medication (L-NAME, L-arginine, BPC 157) at 5 min before the methamphetamine at the second and third week. Given alone, BPC 157 or L-arginine counteracted the amphetamine-, apomorphine-, and MK-801-induced effect, haloperidol-induced catalepsy and chronic methamphetamine-induced sensitization. L-NAME did not affect the apomorphine-, and MK-801-induced effects, haloperidol-induced catalepsy and chronic methamphetamine-induced sensitization, but counteracted the acute amphetamine-induced effect. In combinations (L-NAME + L-arginine), as NO-specific counteraction, L-NAME counteracts L-arginine-induced counteractions in the apomorphine-, MK-801-, haloperidol- and methamphetamine-rats, but not in amphetamine-rats. Unlike L-arginine, BPC 157 maintains its counteracting effect in the presence of the NOS-blockade (L-NAME + BPC 157) or NO-system-over-stimulation (L-arginine + BPC 157). Illustrating the BPC 157-L-arginine relationships, BPC 157 restored the antagonization (L-NAME + L-arginine + BPC 157) when it had been abolished by the co-administration of L-NAME with L-arginine (L-NAME + L-arginine). Finally, BPC 157 directly inhibits the L-NAME high dose-induced catalepsy. Further studies would determine precise BPC 157/dopamine/glutamate/NO-system relationships and clinical application.

BPC 157 antagonized the general anaesthetic potency of thiopental and reduced prolongation of anaesthesia induced by L-NAME/thiopental combination.

AIM: We hypothesized that certain effects of the general anaesthetic thiopental are dependent on NO-related mechanisms, which were consequently counteracted by stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157. MAIN METHODS: (1) All rats intraperitoneally received thiopental (20, 30, 40, and 50 mg/kg) while medication BPC 157 (10 µg/kg, 10 ng/kg, and 10 pg/kg) was given intraperitoneally at 5 min before thiopental. (2) To determine NO-related mechanisms, all rats received intraperitoneally thiopental 40 mg/kg while BPC 157 (10 µg/kg), L-NAME (10 mg/kg) and L-arginine (30 mg/kg) were applied alone and/or combined. BPC 157 was given at 25 min before thiopental while L-NAME, L-arginine, alone and/or combined, were applied at 20 min before thiopental. KEY FINDINGS: (1) BPC 157 own effect on thiopental anaesthesia: BPC 157 (10 ng/kg and 10 µg/kg) caused a significant antagonism of general anaesthesia produced by thiopental with a parallel shift of the dose-response curve to the right. (2) L-NAME-L-arginine-BPC 157 interrelations: L-NAME: Thiopental-induced anaesthesia duration was tripled. L-arginine: Usual thiopental anaesthesia time was not influenced. Active only when given with L-NAME or BPC 157: potentiating effects of L-NAME were lessened, not abolished; shortening effect of BPC 157: abolished. BPC 157 and L-NAME: Potentiating effects of L-NAME were abolished. BPC 157 and L-NAME and L-arginine: BPC 157 +L-NAME +L-arginine rats exhibited values close to those in BPC 157 rats. SIGNIFICANCE: Thiopental general anaesthesia is simultaneously manipulated in both ways with NO system activity modulation, L-NAME (prolongation) and BPC 157 (shortening/counteraction) and L-arginine (interference with L-NAME and BPC 157).

Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 and anaphylactoid reaction in rats and mice after intravenous dextran and white egg administration.

Anesthetized mice or rats received intravenously 6%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 90% dextran and/or white egg (1ml/rat or 0.15ml/mouse) into their tails. Medication (/kg b.w., 5ml/kg) was given intraperitoneally (BPC 157 10µg, 1µg, 10ng, and 10pg/kg, chloropyramine 20mg/kg, and cimetidine 10mg/kg intraperitoneally, alone or in combination while controls received an equivolume of saline), immediately after challenge or, alternatively, at 5min after or 24 or 48h before challenge. The effect was assessed at 5, 10, 20 and 30min after dextran and/or white egg challenge. We commonly noted prominent edema involving the face, upper and lower lip, snout, paws and scrotum (presented with extreme cyanosis), poor respiration and the number of fatalities after dextran and/or white egg application. Contrary, BPC 157 regimens (10µg, 1µg, 10ng, and 10pg/kg) effectively, may both prevent anaphylactoid reactions that may arise from dextran and/or white egg application and furthermore, rescue already advanced reactions when given after the challenge. Chloropyramine and cimetidine given alone were only moderately effective. When given together with BPC 157, the observed effect correlates with the strong effect of BPC 157 given alone.

[Anesthesiology and economics]. / Anesteziologija i gospodarstvo.

The reform of government financing of health services has caused a lot of significant changes in hospitals. The main points of the reform are limited hospital expenses, and reduced financial calculation. The following three factors are influencing upon hospital expenses is the only factor that hospital management can effectively influence upon. Therefore, management and running of financial services are the most responsible and significant for hospital prosperity. The most convenient and prospective way of payment restriction is expenses accounting according to the case of treatment. Furthermore, general expenses should be reduced too. However, economic evaluation should include the analysis of alternative therapeutic possibilities in the framework of expenses, and the outcome of treatment. Following all these, it has been shown how it is possible to reduce the expenses at the Department of Anesthesiology. There are potential factors of savings such as low-flow anesthesia, ABC-analysis of expenses etc. Other ones are staff expenses, that include improvement of working process and adaptable time-table. Pharmaco-economical evaluation of the new drugs has shown how analysis of expenses structure could be acceptable in the scope of anesthesiology. Because of the permanent deficit of financial resources, permanent decentralized control is indispensable.