Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.437
Filter
1.
Cureus ; 16(7): e63562, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39087190

ABSTRACT

Pregnant women have been shown to have a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination against the infection is the most effective strategy for preventing both severe disease and related complications. Nevertheless, vaccination hesitancy among pregnant women is an important issue affecting vaccine uptake and a major challenge for Public Health, as high rates of hesitancy can lead to complete refusal of vaccination, with health implications not only for the mother but also for the fetus. Based on the above, this review aims to capture the rates of vaccination against COVID-19 in pregnancy among European countries, from August 2020 to May 2022, as well as to highlight the predictive factors of its acceptance among pregnant women in these countries. The review of the available literature found that in Europe the acceptance of vaccination against COVID-19 among pregnant women varies with rates ranging from 21.3% to 87% for at least one dose and from 29.5% to 82.7%, for two doses of vaccine. Higher maternal education level, older age at pregnancy, previous vaccination against influenza and pertussis, positive attitude towards vaccines, and acceptance of vaccines during pregnancy are the most frequently reported positive predictors that are associated with higher vaccination rates. The information obtained from this study can contribute in the future, during epidemics or pandemics that may occur, to the development of targeted medical and communication strategies for the effective promotion of vaccination programs and the greatest possible coverage of the population, especially those belonging to vulnerable groups such as pregnant women.

2.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(8): e5877, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090813

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reports of adverse menstrual events emerged during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in multiple countries. This raised the question whether these reports were caused by the vaccines. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate comparative studies on this topic (registered at PROSPERO [CRD42022324973]). METHODS: We included observational studies such as cohort studies and surveys comparing the response to self-reported questionnaires between post- versus pre-vaccination data. PubMed and Cochrane Library searches were conducted on 1 September 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of any prespecified adverse menstrual event, and the outcome measure was the risk ratio. The meta-analysis was conducted by using the Mantel-Haenszel method and the random effects model. We summarized the results on risk factors as well as key findings of the studies included. RESULTS: We retrieved 161 references from electronic databases and additional sources such as references lists. Of those, we considered 21 comparative observational studies. The meta-analysis of any adverse menstrual adverse event reported in 12 studies resulted in a pooled estimate (risk ratio 1.13; 95% CI, 0.96-1.31) that did not favor any group. The analysis was constrained by considerable clinical and statistical heterogeneity. Risk factors for self-reported menstrual changes included a history of COVID-19 infection, the concern about COVID-19 vaccines, smoking, previous cycle irregularities, depression, and stress, and other issues. CONCLUSIONS: The risk ratio did not favor any group and heterogeneity was prevalent among the studies. Most studies suggested that the reported changes were temporary, minor, and nonserious.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Observational Studies as Topic , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Female , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Menstruation , Vaccination/adverse effects , Risk Factors
3.
Vaccine ; : 126150, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39095276

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In late 2022, China became the first country to roll out mucosal COVID-19 vaccines. No prior study has yet compared the immunization stress-related responses (ISRR) among different routes of COVID-19 vaccine delivery. We aimed to compare the immunization-related psychological stress and ISRR between mucosal and intramuscular COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey using a biopsychosocial framework design was performed from January 11 to 20, 2023. Adults with COVID-19 vaccination were eligible for the study, and a total of 1073 adults participated with community-based sample. Primary outcomes were the psychological stress levels and prevalence of ISRR. Multivariate regression models were employed to compare these outcomes between the two vaccination groups. The potential mediating effects of stress on vaccination and ISRR were examined using bootstrap sampling method. To further ensure the robustness of our results, sensitivity analysis with propensity score matching was performed. FINDINGS: In the univariate analysis, participants who received mucosal vaccination reported significantly lower stress levels compared to those who received intramuscular vaccination (3.39 ± 3.02 vs. 3.93 ± 3.24, P = .006). The prevalence of overall ISRR was significantly lower in the mucosal group compared to the intramuscular group (38.4% vs. 47.9%, P = .002). Multivariate regression models revealed that participants who received mucosal vaccination had a significantly lower stress level (ß = -0.516, 95% CI: -0.852 to -0.180; P = .003) and 38.7% fewer overall ISRR (OR = 0.613, 95% CI: 0.427 to 0.881; P = .008), particularly in terms of neurological symptoms. The immunization-related stress mediated the association between vaccination type and ISRR, with indirect effects estimated at 0.0663 (95% CI: 0.0195 to 0.1346) for overall ISRR. CONCLUSIONS: Mucosal COVID-19 vaccination was associated with reduced psychological stress and physical responses, as compared to intramuscular vaccination, which may contribute to increased trust and compliance with routine or mass vaccination efforts in the future.

4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39096518

ABSTRACT

Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis (MRH) is the most frequent entity in the group of reticulohistiocytoses. It is usually accompanied by a symmetrical erosive polyarthritis and is frequently associated with cancer and autoimmune disorders. Autoimmune syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) is an inflammatory syndrome triggered by adjuvants such as those contained in vaccines or by silicone implants. Here we report a 71-years old female with a history of breast cancer treated with surgery and subsequent prosthesis who developed a systemic hyperinflammatory syndrome including seronegative symmetric polyarthritis, multiple skin lesions and two large nodular lesions in the oral cavity and larynx. Clinical picture was consistent with a clinical diagnosis of ASIA, with breast implant rupture and/or vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 as possible triggers. Histopathology of skin, oral and laryngeal nodules revealed cutaneous/mucous and submucosal infiltration of large epithelioid mononuclear or binucleated cells with fine granular ground glass-like cytoplasm and round to kidney-shaped nuclei with prominent nucleoli, without atypical features or relevant pleomorphism, accompanied by sparse giant cells and lymphocytes. These cells stained positive for CD68 and CD45 and negative for S100, CD1a, and markers of epithelial or neural/melanocytic differentiation, altogether consistent with a diagnosis of reticulohistiocytosis. Clinic-pathological correlation allowed the final diagnosis of MRH. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a co-occurrence of MRH with ASIA and this is relevant to broaden the spectrum of those both rare diseases.

5.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(6): 104448, 2024 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39096568

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the occurrence of tinnitus following COVID-19 vaccination using data mining and descriptive analyses in two U.S. vaccine safety surveillance systems. METHODS: Reports of tinnitus after COVID-19 vaccination to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from 2020 through 2024 were examined using empirical Bayesian data mining and by calculating reporting rates. In the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) population, ICD-10 coded post-vaccination medical visits were examined using tree-based data mining, and tinnitus visit incidence rates during post-vaccination days 1-140 were calculated by age group for COVID-19 vaccines and for comparison, influenza vaccine. RESULTS: VAERS data mining did not find disproportionate reporting of tinnitus for any COVID-19 vaccine. VAERS received up to 84.82 tinnitus reports per million COVID-19 vaccine doses administered. VSD tree-based data mining found no signals for tinnitus. VSD tinnitus visit incidence rates after COVID-19 vaccines were similar to those after influenza vaccine except for the group aged ≥65 years (Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, 165 per 10,000 person-years; Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, 154; influenza vaccine, 135). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these findings do not support an increased risk of tinnitus following COVID-19 vaccination but cannot definitively exclude the possibility. Descriptive comparisons between COVID-19 and influenza vaccines were limited by lack of adjustment for potential confounding factors.

6.
Ann Med ; 56(1): 2392882, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39155852

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an extensive autoimmune disorder, compromises viral resistance and alters immune responses post respiratory virus vaccines. This study aims to assess immune response levels and safety in SLE patients following respiratory virus vaccines. METHODS: Extensive searches, until 1 March 2024, were conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Outcomes, encompassing seroconversion rate (SCR), antibody and IgG titers, neutralizing antibodies, anti-spike antibodies, anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, and adverse events, were appraised. RESULTS: Sixteen articles, comprising 25 observational studies, were included. SLE patients exhibited lower SCR (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.26 to 0.69), antibody titers (SMD=-2.84, 95%CI: -3.36 to -1.61), and neutralizing antibodies (OR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.13 to 0.56) compared to the healthy population post respiratory virus vaccines. Notably, differences were statistically insignificant for anti-RBD IgG (OR = 1.75, 95%CI: 0.10 to 29.42), IgG titers (SMD=-2.54, 95%CI: -5.57 to -0.49), anti-spike antibodies (OR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.08 to 1.53), injection site discomfort (OR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.52 to 2.06), fatigue (OR = 1.23, 95%CI: 0.74 to 2.03), fever (OR = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.64 to 1.63), localized reactions (OR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.37 to 1.30), systemic reactions (OR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.59 to 1.69), allergic reactions (OR = 5.11, 95%CI: 0.24 to 107.10), self-reported vaccination-related adverse events (OR = 1.61, 95%CI: 0.56 to 4.63), and disease flares after vaccination (OR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.14 to 7.28). CONCLUSION: Despite the reduced immune response and host protection in SLE patients post-Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza vaccines compared to the healthy population, safety profiles are comparable. Therefore, it is recommended that SLE patients receive COVID-19 and influenza viral vaccines to fortify their resistance.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , Immunity, Humoral , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Observational Studies as Topic , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/immunology , Immunity, Humoral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Female , Male , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage
8.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1404800, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39156891

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients suffering from neurological symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination (post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome (PCVS)) have imposed an increasing challenge on medical practice, as diagnostic precision and therapeutic options are lacking. Underlying autoimmune dysfunctions, including autoantibodies, have been discussed in neurological disorders after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Here, we describe the frequency and targets of autoantibodies against peripheral nervous system tissues in PCVS. Methods: Sera from 50 PCVS patients with peripheral neurological symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination and 35 vaccinated healthy controls were used in this study. IgG autoreactivity was measured via indirect immunofluorescence assays on mouse sciatic nerve teased fibers. The frequencies of autoantibodies were compared between groups using Fisher's exact test. Serum anti-ganglioside antibodies were measured in ganglioside blots. Autoantibody target identification was performed using immunoprecipitation coupled to mass spectrometry. Subsequent target confirmation was conducted via cell-based assays and ELISA. Results: Compared with controls, PCVS patients had a significantly greater frequency of autoantibodies against peripheral nervous system structures (9/50(18%) vs 1/35(3%); p=0.04). Autoantibodies bound to paranodes (n=5), axons (n=4), Schmidt-Lanterman incisures (n=2) and Schwann cell nuclei (n=1). Conversely, antibodies against gangliosides were absent in PCVS patients. Target identification and subsequent confirmation revealed various subunits of neurofilaments as well as DFS-70 as autoantibody epitopes. Conclusion: Our data suggest that autoantibodies against nervous system tissue could be relevant in PCVS patients. Autoantibodies against neurofilaments and cell nuclei with so far non-established links to this disease spectrum should be further elucidated to determine their biomarker potential.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunoglobulin G , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Autoantibodies/immunology , Autoantibodies/blood , Male , Female , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Middle Aged , COVID-19/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Aged , Mice , Animals , Adult , Vaccination , Gangliosides/immunology , Peripheral Nerves/immunology
9.
J Vitreoretin Dis ; 8(4): 471-475, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39148575

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To present a case of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) leading to the diagnosis of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss syndrome) within 1 week of an adenovirus vector COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: A case was reviewed. Results: A 50-year-old man with atopic dermatitis and asthma presented with acute painless vision loss in 1 eye. An examination and imaging findings showed CRAO. Further evaluation found eosinophilia and elevated inflammatory markers. A workup for vasculitis showed elevated cytoplasmic-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, perinuclear-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, myeloperoxidase antibody, rheumatoid factor, and total immunoglobulin E. Skin biopsies were consistent with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Steroids, cyclophosphamide, and mepolizumab were initiated. At 1 year, the patient's systemic symptoms had improved but his vision had not. Conclusions: Few reports exist of CRAO associated with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, with no other instances related to an adenovirus vector COVID-19 vaccination. Treating a systemic vasculitis early can be vision saving in the fellow eye and prevent systemic life-threatening complications.

10.
Front Pharmacol ; 15: 1376474, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39175548

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To know the frequency and characteristics of neurological manifestations of probable immune origin occurring after exposure to COVID-19 vaccination. In addition, to pre-study the usefulness of the Spanish pharmacovigilance system and lymphocyte transformation test in establishing causality. Methods: Retrospective case study, including patients admitted to the Neurology department from January 2021 to May 2022 with a probable neuroimmune disorder. Demographic, clinical and COVID-19 vaccination antecedent data were collected from medical records. Results: From a total of 108 patients, 30 were excluded due to a different etiological diagnosis after follow-up. Thirty-six patients (46.2%) had received the COVID-19 vaccine in the previous 3 months (21.8% during the previous month). BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine was the most frequent in this group (63.9%). 69/108 were female and mean age 51.2 years (SD 22.59), with no significant difference with not recently-vaccinated (U-Mann Whitney, p = 0.256). The neurological syndromes found were (vaccinated/total): polyradiculoneuropathy (8/16), encephalitis (5/11), multiple sclerosis relapse (5/16), optic neuritis (1/4), myelitis (3/6), cranial neuropathy (6/10), aseptic meningitis (1/3) and others (7/11). Acute immunosuppressive treatment was administered in 61.1% of cases and 47.2% presented complete clinical improvement, without significant differences with non-vaccinated patients (chi-square, p = 0.570). Eleven vaccinated patients were studied in the pharmacovigilance office for possible adverse drug reaction. Causality according to the Spanish pharmacovigilance system (SPVS) algorithm was "Related" to COVID-19 vaccine (score ≥ 4) in 11 cases with positive in vitro study (lymphocyte transformation test) to polyethylene glycol-2000 and polysorbate-80 in 4 cases. Conclusion: Neuroimmune disorders appearing after administration of COVID-19 vaccine do not seem to present important differentiating clinical and/or evolutive features. Delayed hypersensitivity to vaccine excipients could be one of the pathophysiological mechanisms, and lymphocyte transformation test is a useful tool to identify it.

11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39093376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: County-level barriers (sociodemographic barriers, limited healthcare system resources, healthcare accessibility barriers, irregular healthcare seeking behaviors, low vaccination history) may impact individuals' reasons for receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: This study linked data from REACH-US (Race-Related Experiences Associated with COVID-19 and Health in the United States), a nationally representative, online survey of 5475 adults living in the U.S (January-March 2021) to county-level barriers in the COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage Index. County-level vaccination barriers were measured using the COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage Index. Participants reported why they would or would not receive the COVID-19 vaccine in an open-ended item and their responses were coded using thematic analysis. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests assessed whether reasons for COVID-19 vaccination intentions varied by county-level barriers and whether these distributions varied across racial/ethnic groups. RESULTS: Thematic analysis revealed twelve themes in participants' reasons why they would or would not receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Themes of societal responsibility (9.8% versus 7.7%), desire to return to normal (8.1% versus 4.7%), and trust in science/healthcare/government (7.7% versus 5.1%) were more frequently reported in counties with low/medium barriers (versus high/very high) (p-values < 0.05). Concerns of COVID-19 vaccine side effects/safety/development (25.3% versus 27.9%) and concerns of access/costs/availability/convenience (1.9% versus 3.6%) were less frequently reported in counties with low/medium barriers (versus high/very high) (p-values < 0.05). Trends in the prevalence of these themes varied across racial/ethnic groups (p-values < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Future pandemic responses should consider potential ways county-level barriers shape reasons for COVID-19 vaccination.

12.
eNeurologicalSci ; 36: 100511, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38989276

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are at higher risk of having infections due to receiving disease modifying therapies. The current study was conducted among Iranian MS patients who had experienced at least one episode of COVID-19 infection in order to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 vaccination on symptoms of their infection. Data on demographic information, MS characteristics, COVID-19 infection details, and vaccination status were collected. Statistical analyses, were performed to evaluate the association between vaccination and symptoms of COVID-19 infection. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on confirmed MS patients. Demographic data and COVID-19 related symptoms were gathered via an online questionnaire. Confirmation of patients' who declared to be vaccinated was checked by their COVID-19 vaccination card. Results: A total of 236 MS patients participated in the study. The majority were female (79.7%), with a mean age of 36.1 ± 7.9 years. Among the participants, 72.5% had received the COVID-19 vaccine before their first episode of COVID-19 infection. The analysis showed a significant difference in the incidence of respiratory symptoms (P-value: 0.01) and headache (P-value: 0.04) between vaccinated and non-vaccinated individuals. Logistic regression analysis revealed that vaccinated MS patients had lower odds of developing respiratory symptoms (OR:0.29, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.53, P-value<0.001) or headache (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.98, P-value: 0.04) during their next COVID-19 infection episode. Moreover, MS patients who were receiving immunosuppressive drugs were less likely to have respiratory symptoms (OR:0.35, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.77, P-value:0.009) but not headache (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.60, P-value: 0.39). Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccination can reduce the incidence of respiratory symptoms and headaches in MS patients during COVID-19 infection episodes. Additionally, patients who are receiving immunosuppressive drugs may benefit from COVID-19 vaccination.

13.
J Virus Erad ; 10(2): 100377, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38983868

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Healthcare professionals working in infectious disease units are often engaged in the care of patients with HIV infection. A cocoon vaccination strategy may protect those who are immunocompromised from a severe course of COVID-19. Methods: The research was conducted between January 2021 and June 2022. The study participants were 450 healthcare workers (HCWs) from the Hospital for Infectious Diseases in Warsaw who were vaccinated against COVID-19 with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) -, thefirst available type of vaccine in Poland. Sera were collected according to the schedule of the study. Statistical analyses were performed with non-parametric tests: Wilcoxon's test was used to compare dependent numerical variables, and Fisher's exact test and the Chi-squared test to compare categorical variables. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among the 450 HCWs working in the Hospital for Infectious Diseases in Warsaw 412 (91,5 %) were vaccinated against COVID-19. In total 170 (41,3 %) vaccinated HCWs were included in the final analysis. Their median age was 51 years [interquartile range (IQR): 41-60 years] and median body mass index (BMI) was 25.10 [IQR: 22.68-29.03]. Most of the cohort consisted of women (n = 137, 80.59 %), with the majority working directly with patients (n = 137, 73.21 %). It was found that as early as 14 days after the second dose of the vaccine, 100 % of the study participants achieved a positive result for SARS CoV-2 S-RBD antibodies. There were 168 subjects who had had a COVID-19 diagnosis before entering study and after vaccination 65 HCWs was diagnosed with COVID-19. Conclusions: Due to the fact that people living with HIV with severe immunodeficiency may have an incomplete immune response to COVID vaccination and be at risk of a severe course of the disease, the cocoon strategy of vaccinating medical personnel may be beneficial for these patients.

14.
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne) ; 4: 1352962, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38984132

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The aim of this study was to present a case of severe visual loss due to retinal arteriovenous occlusion and papillitis in one eye following vaccination against coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Methods: A 45-year-old man undergoing treatment for hypertension had severely reduced visual acuity in the right eye 1 day after receiving a third dose of a COVID-19 vaccine manufactured by Moderna. Clinical examination showed that the best-corrected visual acuity in the right eye was counting fingers. Other findings included circumferential retinal hemorrhage, perimacular ischemic color, severe macular edema, and severe optic disc swelling, indicating the presence of central retinal vein occlusion, incomplete central retinal artery occlusion, and papillitis. Based on the possibility of post-vaccination inflammation and/or abnormal immune response, three courses of steroid pulse therapy were administered, and the visual acuity slightly improved to 20/1,000. Results: Three months after the onset of symptoms, macular edema disappeared; conversely, retinal thinning of the macula and extensive non-perfusion areas mainly on the nasal side were noted. Conclusion: The findings in this case suggest that inflammation and abnormal immune response after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination may lead to combined retinal arteriovenous occlusion and papillitis.

15.
J Oral Sci ; 66(3): 193-197, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39010168

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (NVP) are common among pregnant women and can be severe enough to require hospitalization. However, the mechanism underlying NVP pathogenesis remains unclear. This study examined factors associated with adverse events after vaccination, including a past history of NVP. METHODS: A questionnaire-based survey was completed by non-pregnant women working at Nagasaki University Hospital who received two doses of the BNT162b2 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. This study primarily examined the association between a past history of NVP and post-vaccination fever, as fever was determined to be the most objective and reliable indicator of the surveyed adverse events. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that post-vaccination fever was more strongly associated with a past history of NVP (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-3.07) than either age (0.73; 0.56-0.96) or weight (0.85; 0.70-1.15), which were previously considered to be highly associated with the incidence of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSION: These results suggest an involvement of a similar pathological condition in developing NVP and post-vaccination fever.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine , Fever , Nausea , Vomiting , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , BNT162 Vaccine/adverse effects , Nausea/etiology , Fever/etiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Vaccination/adverse effects , Young Adult , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Transpl Int ; 37: 12729, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39050189

ABSTRACT

This study assessed humoral and T cell-mediated immune responses to the BNT162b2 vaccine in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) and lung transplant (LUT) recipients who received three doses of the vaccine from March 2021 at our institution. Serum samples were collected 60 days post-second and third dose to quantify antibodies against the spike region of SARS-CoV-2 while whole blood samples were collected to analyze the SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response using an IFN-γ ELISpot assay. We enrolled 244 OLT and 120 LUT recipients. The third dose increased antibody titres in OLT recipients (from a median value of 131 after the second dose to 5523 IU/mL, p < 0.001) and LUT recipients (from 14.8 to 1729 IU/mL, p < 0.001). T-cell response also increased in OLT recipients (from 8.5 to 23 IFN-γ SFU per 250,000 PBMC, p < 0.001) and LUT recipients (from 8 to 15 IFN-γ SFU per 250,000 PBMC, p < 0.001). A total of 128 breakthrough infections were observed: two (0.8%) OLT recipients were hospitalized due to COVID-19 and one died (0.4%); among LUT recipients, seven were hospitalized (5.8%) and two patients died (1.7%). In conclusion, the three-dose schedule of the BNT162b2 vaccine elicited both humoral and T cell-mediated responses in solid organ transplant recipients. The risk of severe COVID-19 post-vaccination was low in this population.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 , Liver Transplantation , Lung Transplantation , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , Aged , Adult , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Italy , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Immunity, Cellular , Transplant Recipients , Immunity, Humoral
17.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1406959, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39050596

ABSTRACT

Background: Vaccination was a key measure in the COVID-19 pandemic response, though much work was needed to promote vaccine uptake and acceptance. In Kenya, Community Health Volunteers (CHVs) played a key role in vaccine education and promotion. We conducted this study to explore CHVs' experiences of implementing COVID-19 vaccine education and promotion during the pandemic to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake in two areas of Kenya. Methods: In a qualitative descriptive study, we conducted 30 structured in-depth interviews with 20 CHVs and 10 Community Health Assistants from rural Kilifi County and Kangemi, an urban informal settlement of Nairobi County in Kenya between April 2022 and July 2022. Findings: Thematic analysis generated five key themes in relation to CHVs' experiences of implementing COVID-19 vaccine education and promotion: Five key themes emerged regarding CHVs' experiences of implementing COVID-19 vaccine education and promotion: (1) vaccine preferences influenced acceptance, (2) the fear of side effects was a barrier, (3) misinformation was widespread (4) lack of trust in government and politicization of vaccines was a barrier, and (5) CHVs' efforts were a facilitator to increased uptake. Conclusion: Extensive community outreach from CHVs contributed to the high uptake of primary vaccines and boosters during the COVID-19 pandemic. CHVs acting as role models by receiving vaccinations first was particularly important in influencing communities to accept vaccinations. Findings provide evidence for prioritizing CHVs in the planning and implementation of future vaccination initiatives in Kenya and other countries.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Community Health Workers , Qualitative Research , Humans , Kenya , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , Community Health Workers/psychology , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Volunteers/psychology , Health Education , Health Promotion/methods , Vaccination/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Interviews as Topic , SARS-CoV-2
18.
Prev Med Rep ; 44: 102804, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39040951

ABSTRACT

Background: This study aimed to examine the prevalence of menstrual cycle changes (MCs) and their patterns among healthy Syrian women following the administration of the first and second doses of a vaccine. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey following campaigns for COVID-19 vaccines was conducted in 2022 from June 26 to August 3. Data collected included the participants' demographic characteristics, vaccination status, and multiple-choice questions for MCs changes after the first and second doses. Results: Of 236, 89.8 % completed all shots of the vaccine. After the first dose, 36.9 % reported MCs, and 35 % after the second dose. Most women did not experience changes in menstrual cycle frequency-81.8 % after the first dose and 83.4 % after the second dose. Similarly, most women did not observe changes in cycle length, or menstrual flow quantity-5.5 % after the first dose and 8 % after the second dose reported spotting. Dysmenorrhea was reported by 15.7 % and 14.1 % of women after the first and second doses, respectively. Conclusion: MCs are a potential symptom that a healthy woman at childbearing age could have after a different type of COVID-19 vaccine. MCs patterns do not significantly differ following vaccine doses.

19.
Cureus ; 16(6): e63410, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39070394

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Most reported adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination have been transient. However, persistent adverse events may occur with some frequency. This study aimed to analyze patient background characteristics and trends, with a focus on whether adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination were transient or persistent. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at a single institution in Japan. PATIENTS: The study cohort included 47 patients who presented with symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination between May 2021 and September 2023. The patients were classified into two groups based on the duration of symptoms: transient group, less than four weeks; persistent group, greater than or equal to four weeks. Data on age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, underlying conditions, type of COVID-19 vaccination, number of doses, onset, symptoms, and treatments were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: The median age was 51.0 years and 74.5% were females, with a particularly high proportion of women in their 40s. The use of the bivalent omicron-containing booster vaccine (BA.1) was significantly more common in the persistent group than in the transient group (p = 0.0267). Onset in the transient group was more common after the first vaccination, whereas onset in the persistent group was more common after the second and subsequent vaccinations (p = 0.003). Regarding symptoms, pain was more frequent in the persistent group than in the transient group (60% vs. 13.6%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study investigated the presence of persistent symptoms, especially pain, after COVID-19 vaccination. Persistent symptoms were frequently reported after the second vaccination. It should be noted that the study does not negate the usefulness of COVID-19 vaccines.

20.
Cureus ; 16(6): e63305, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39070412

ABSTRACT

Neuralgic amyotrophy, also known as Parsonage-Turner syndrome (PTS), is characterized by severe pain and muscle wasting affecting the anterior body, including the head, shoulder, upper limb, and chest wall. Often triggered by an antecedent event, such as infection, PTS encompasses various conditions historically identified as separate entities. In 1948, Parsonage and Turner unified these conditions under the term neuralgic amyotrophy based on shared features of intense pain and muscular atrophy. Recent studies have highlighted PTS as a spectrum disorder with diverse manifestations, including pure sensory neuropathy, extensive neuropathy, spinal accessory nerve involvement, and diaphragmatic palsy. We reviewed 26 documented cases of PTS following SARS-CoV-2 infection, emphasizing the importance of considering PTS in individuals with a history of COVID-19 due to varied clinical presentations. Standardized diagnostic methods and comprehensive evaluations are crucial for accurate diagnosis and management. Future research should focus on consistent evaluation methods and employing a comprehensive differential diagnosis approach.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL