Improving pre-emptive access to the kidney transplant waiting list between 2017 and 2021: assessment of a regional program in Aquitaine / Amélioration de l'accès préemptif à la liste d'attente de transplantation rénale entre 2017 et 2021 : bilan d'un programme régional en Aquitaine.

Introduction: Pre-emptive access to the kidney transplant (KT) waiting list remains limited in France, with only 3.9% of patients on pre-emptive KT and 5.6% of patients registered at the time of initiation of dialysis. A similar trend was observed in Aquitaine. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a regional program in terms of access to the waiting list for patients initiating a kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Methods: We included all patients assessed for registration on the list between 2017 and 2020, 2017 being the reference year and 2018 the beginning of the program. Using the CRISTAL and REIN registries, we assessed changes in the number of patients on the list at the time of initiation of dialysis or transplantation. Results: The number of new assessed candidates increased gradually each year from 255 in 2017 to 352 in 2020 (+38%). The number of patients on the list sharply increased in 2018 from 229 in 2017 to 319 in 2018 (+39.3%) and then remained stable. At the initiation of KRT, the proportion of patients registered on the waiting list increased gradually from 7.1% in 2017 to 18.2% in 2020. The proportion of pre-emptive KT remained stable between 2017 and 2021 (around 7%) with a decrease in 2020 (4.6%). Approximately 60% of patients had a contraindication to transplantation throughout the study. Conclusion: This study showed that a regional program aimed at providing better information to healthcare professionals and patients and encouraging rapid assessment of transplant candidates could increase the rate of pre-emptive registration on the KT waiting list for eligible patients over 4 years.

Introduction: L'accès préemptif à la liste d'attente de transplantation rénale (TR) reste limité en France, avec seulement 3,9 % de TR préemptives et 5,6 % de patients inscrits lors de l'initiation de la dialyse. Une tendance similaire était observée en Aquitaine. L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer l'impact d'un programme régional en termes d'accès à la liste d'attente chez les patients débutant un traitement de suppléance. Méthodes: Nous avons inclus l'ensemble des patients évalués pour une inscription sur liste entre 2017 et 2020, 2017 étant l'année de référence et 2018 l'année de début du programme régional. Nous avons évalué de façon annuelle, grâce aux registres CRISTAL et REIN, l'évolution du nombre de patients inscrits sur liste lors de l'initiation du traitement de suppléance par dialyse ou transplantation. Résultats: Le nombre de nouveaux candidats évalués a augmenté graduellement chaque année, passant de 255 en 2017 à 352 en 2020 (+ 38 %). Le nombre de patients inscrits sur la liste a fortement augmenté en 2018 passant de 229 en 2017 à 319 en 2018 (+39,3 %), puis est resté stable. À l'initiation du traitement de suppléance, la proportion de patients inscrits a augmenté graduellement passant de 7,1 % en 2017 à 18,2 % en 2020. La proportion de TR préemptive est restée stable entre 2017 et 2021 (environ 7 %) avec une baisse en 2020 (4,6 %). Environ 60 % des patients présentaient une contre-­indication à la transplantation tout au long de cette étude. Conclusion: Cette étude a montré qu'un programme régional visant à mieux informer les professionnels de santé et les patients et favorisant l'évaluation rapide des candidats à la greffe permet d'augmenter en 4 ans le taux d'inscription préemptive sur liste d'attente de TR chez les patients éligibles.

Impact of newly diagnosed prostate cancer at time of evaluation for renal transplantation.

Systematic screening for prostate cancer is widely recommended in candidates for renal transplant at the time of listing. There are concerns that overdiagnosis of low-risk prostate cancer may result in reducing access to transplant without demonstrated oncological benefits. The objective of the study was to assess the outcome of newly diagnosed prostate cancer in candidates for transplant at the time of listing, and its impact on transplant access and transplant outcomes according to treatment options. This retrospective study was conducted over 10 years in 12 French transplant centers. Patients included were candidates for renal transplant at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis. Demographical and clinical data regarding renal disease, prostate cancer, and transplant surgery were collected. The primary outcome of the study was the interval between prostate cancer diagnosis and active listing according to treatment options. Overall median time from prostate cancer diagnosis to active listing was 25.0 months [16.4-40.2], with statistically significant differences in median time between the radiotherapy and the active surveillance groups (p = .03). Prostate cancer treatment modalities had limited impact on access and outcome of renal transplantation. Active surveillance in low-risk patients does not seem to compromise access to renal transplantation, nor does it impact oncological outcomes.

Nurse-led coordinated surgical care pathways for cost optimization of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: medico-economic analysis of the UroCCR-25 AMBU-REIN study.

PURPOSE: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) reduces morbidity, enabling development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and day-case protocols. Additional financial costs limit its integration into clinical practice. We evaluated the medico-economic impact of RAPN using a nurse-led coordinated pathway of care (NLC-RAPN). METHODS: All tumor RAPNs performed in 2017 were prospectively included in nurse-led protocols: NP-RAAC (ERAS) or Ambu-Rein (day case). Clinico-biological and pathological data were prospectively collected within the French Research Network for Kidney Cancer database (NCT03293563). Estimated costs were compared to "average" patients at the national level operated by open partial nephrectomy (OPN) or RAPN, using data from the 2017 French hospital discharge database and the national cost scale. RESULTS: The NLC-RAPN cohort (n = 151) included 27 (18%) outpatients and the average hospital length of stay (LOS) was 2.4 days. In the national control cohorts for OPN (n = 2475) and RAPN (n = 3529), the average LOS were 8.0 and 5.2 days, respectively. The mean incomes per group were €7607 for NLC-RAPN, €9813 for OPN, and €8215 for RAPN. The mean daily cost of stay was €659 for NLC-RAPN, €838 for OPN, and €725 for RAPN. The overall cost for NLC-RAPN was €6594, €8733 for OPN, and €8763 for RAPN. The best operational margin was obtained for day-case NLC-RAPN (€1967). CONCLUSION: Combining RAPN with nurse-led coordinated pathways of care led to a shorter hospital stay and reduced costs versus OPN. This may facilitate the economic sustainability of robotic assistance for hospitals where the extra cost is not covered by the healthcare system.

Partial nephrectomy in solitary kidneys: comparison between open surgery and robotic-assisted laparoscopy on perioperative and functional outcomes (UroCCR-54 study).

PURPOSE: The management of solitary kidney tumors is a surgical challenge, requiring irreproachable results on both oncological and functional outcomes. The goal of our study was to compare the perioperative results of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) to open surgery in this indication. METHODS: We led a multicentric study based on the prospectively maintained French national database UroCCR. Patients who underwent partial nephrectomy on a solitary kidney between 1988 and 2020 were included. Clinical and pathological data were retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome of the study was the analysis of the variation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated according to MDRD at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months depending on the chosen surgical approach. The secondary outcomes were the comparison of Trifecta success, perioperative complications, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: In total, 150 patients were included; 68 (45%) in the RAPN group and 82 (55%) in the open surgery group. The two groups were comparable for all data. The variation of eGFR at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months was comparable without any significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.45). Trifecta was achieved in 40% of the patients in the RAPN group and 33% in the open group (p = 0.42). A significant difference was observed for the length of stay, 5 days for the robot group versus 9 days for the open surgery group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In our study, the surgical approach did not modify functional results and we noted a significant decrease in hospital stay and complications in the RAPN group. RAPN is a safe and efficient method for management of kidney tumors in solitary kidneys.

3D-Image guided robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis (UroCCR study 51).

PURPOSE: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a difficult procedure with risk of significant perioperative complications. The objective was to evaluate the impact of preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance with 3D model reconstructions on perioperative outcomes of RAPN. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent RAPN for kidney tumor by three high-volume expert surgeons from academic centers. Clinical data were collected prospectively after written consent into the French kidney cancer network database UroCCR (CNIL-DR 2013-206; NCT03293563). Our cohort was divided into two groups: 3D-Image guided RAPN group (3D-IGRAPN) and control group. A propensity score according to age, pre-operative renal function and RENAL tumor complexity score was used. Both surgical techniques were compared in terms of perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: The initial study cohort included 230 3D-IGRAPN and 415 control RAPN. Before propensity-score matching, patients in the 3D-IGRAPN group had a larger tumor (4.3 cm vs. 3.5 cm, P < 0.001) and higher RENAL complexity score (9 vs. 8, P < 0.001). Following propensity-score matching, there were 157 patients in both groups. The rate of major complications was lower for patients in the 3D-IGRAPN group (3.8% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.04). The median percentage of eGFR variation recorded at first follow-up was lower in the 3D-IGRAPN group (- 5.6% vs. - 10.5%, P = 0.002). The trifecta achievement rate was higher in the 3D-IGRAPN group (55.7% vs. 45.1%; P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional kidney reconstructions use for pre-operative planning and intraoperative surgical guidance lowers the risk of complications and improve perioperative clinical outcomes of RAPN.

Can Pre-Operative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Help Predict Non-Metastatic Renal Carcinoma Recurrence after Nephrectomy? (UroCCR-61 Study).

Recent studies suggested that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could play a key role in tumor initiation, progression and response to treatments. The main objective was to assess the prognostic value of the pre-operative NLR on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with non-hereditary localized renal cell carcinoma. From the UroCCR database (NCT03293563), factors influencing the disease recurrence of consecutive patients who underwent nephrectomy for cT1-T4 N0M0 were analyzed using multi-variate cox regression and log-rank methods. We included 786 patients, among which 135 (17.2%) experienced a recurrence at a median time of 23.7 [8.5-48.6] months. RFS for patients with a pre-operative NLR of <2.7 was 94% and 88% at 3 and 5 years, respectively, versus 76% and 63% for patients with a NLR of ≥2.7 (p < 0.001, log-rank test). To predict the risk of post-operative recurrence, the NLR was combined with the UCLA integrated staging system (UISS), and we defined four groups of the UroCCR-61 predictive model. The RFS rates at 3 and 5 years were 100% and 97% in the very-low-risk group, 93% and 86% in the low-risk group, 78% and 68% in the intermediate-risk group and 63% and 46% in the high-risk group (p < 0.0001). The pre-operative NLR seems to be an inexpensive and easily accessible prognostic bio-marker for non-metastatic RCCs.

Consequences of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on urological surgery in France: a nationwide analysis of the healthcare system database.

The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak overwhelmed the healthcare systems worldwide. Saturation of hospitals and the risk of contagion led to a reduction in the care of other diseases. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on urological surgery in France during the year 2020. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: An observational descriptive study was conducted on anonymised data collected from the national healthcare database established each year as part of the Program for the Medicalization of Information Systems in Medicine, Surgery, Obstetrics and Odontology. INTERVENTION: None. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We gathered the number of urology surgical procedures carried out between 2010 and 2019, and we observed the difference between the forecast and actual number of urological surgeries performed in 2020. RESULTS: Urological surgeries decreased by 11.4%, non-oncological surgeries being more affected (-13.1%) than oncological ones (-4.1%). Among the most relevant surgeries, female urinary incontinence (-44.7%) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (-20.8%) were the most impacted ones, followed by kidney cancer (-9%), urolithiasis (-8.7%), radical cystectomy for bladder cancer (-6.1%), prostate cancer (-3.6%) and transurethral resection of bladder tumour (-2%). Public hospitals had a more reduced activity (-17.7%) than private ones (-9.1%). Finally, the distribution of the reduction in urological activities by region did not correspond to the regional burden of SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSIONS: Urological care was severely affected during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Even if oncological surgeries were prioritised, the longer it takes to receive appropriate care, the greater the risk on survival impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The data collection and analysis was authorised by the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) under the number1 861 282v2.

Feasibility of salvage robotic partial nephrectomy after ablative treatment failure (UroCCR-62 study).

BACKGROUND: Ablative therapies (AT) are increasingly being offered to patients with kidney tumors. In cases of failure or local relapse, salvage surgery may be required. Such procedures often require an open approach, are difficult and have received little attention in the literature. We aim to evaluate the feasibility of salvage robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (sRAPN) after AT. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric retrospective study of all patients who benefited from sRAPN. Clinical data were collected prospectively after written consent in the French UroCCR database. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2020, 724 RAPN were performed in our center; of these, 11 patients underwent salvage RAPN and four (36.4%) had an imperative indication for a solitary kidney. The median patient age was 54 (49-72) years, median preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 65.5 (42.9-88.4) mL/min/1.73 m2, and median tumor diameter was 34 (16-38) mm. Extensive perinephric fibrosis was present in 90.9% of cases. Postoperative complications occurred in 36.4% of patients, including major complications in 18.2%. The median GFR at three months (56.8 [45.9-63.9] mL/min/1.73 m2) and at last follow-up (52.1 [45.85-68.3] mL/min/1.73 m2) were not significantly different to the preoperative GFR (P=0.51 and P=0.65, respectively). During follow-up (median 12 months), three patients (all with Von Hippel Lindau disease) developed a recurrence, but none were on the sRAPN site. CONCLUSIONS: Our series of sRAPN following AT failure confirms that such surgery is feasible with good functional and oncological results. However, these surgeries remain difficult, are associated with significant complication rate and should be performed in expert centers.

Incidental prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: incidence and predictive factors for clinical progression.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) rate and identify predictive factors for PCa progression after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). METHODS: A retrospective review of all iPCa cases diagnosed after HoLEP procedures between April 2012 and May 2020 was conducted. iPCa was defined as a symptom-free cancer diagnosed after HoLEP in patients without any diagnosis or suspicion of PCa before surgical treatment. PCa progression was suspected by rise in PSA from baseline after HoLEP and confirmed by progressive disease detected on transrectal needle biopsy or by the appearance of metastatic disease. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify predictive factors for cancer progression. RESULTS: The iPCa rate in our cohort was 10.7% (n = 134). Among patients with iPCa, 25 (18.6%) progressed with a mean follow-up of 32 months. Regarding predictive factors, post-operative PSA (OR 2.35, p < 0.001) was significantly associated with PCa progression in multivariate analysis. The cutoff value for post-operative PSA was determined at 2 ng/mL. Among iPCa cases, 14 patients (10.4%) had both T1b stage disease and PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL, while 68 (50.7%) had neither of these factors. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with both factors had the highest risk of progression (OR 49.4; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, post-operative PSA above 2 ng/mL was the only independent risk factor for iPCa progression after HoLEP. Patients with post-operative PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL must be considered to be at risk of progression and may require early curative treatment or closer follow-up in the post-operative period, especially when this is associated with T1b stage disease.

Aseptic cystitis induced by nivolumab and ipilimumab combination for metastatic melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma. Combination of ICI with ipilimumab cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and nivolumab [anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)] improves tumoral response compared to anti-PD1 monotherapy in melanoma patients, but is associated with more severe and multiple immune-related adverse events. We report the first case of aseptic cystitis induced by ipilimumab and nivolumab combination in a 61-year-old melanoma patient. She described after two infusions, diarrhea, pollakiuria, intense bladder pain, urinary urgency, and nocturia. Repeated negative urine culture tests led to perform cystoscopy. Mucosal bladder biopsies showed lymphocytic T-cells infiltration in intraepithelial and in subepithelial connective tissue, which were consistent with the diagnosis of immune-related aseptic cystitis. Aseptic cystitis is a rare and poorly known side-effect related to ICI. Only four other cases with anti-PD1 monotherapy were found in literature, only in Japanese patients. It simulates bacterial cystitis with negative urinary tests, and is often associated with atypical symptoms like diarrhea, which may delay the diagnosis. Oral steroids appear to be the most efficient therapeutic options.

Robot-assisted versus open surgery for radical nephrectomy with level 1-2 vena cava tumor thrombectomy: a French monocenter experience (UroCCR study #73).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper was to assess the feasibility of robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RN) with inferior vena cava thrombectomy (RRVCT) and compare perioperative and oncological outcomes of this approach to open surgery for renal tumors with level 1-2 inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients surgically treated for renal cancer with IVC level 1-2 thrombus in the Urology department of Bordeaux University Hospital between December 2015 and December 2019. Patients were stratified by surgical approach in two groups: open vs. robotic procedures. Pre-, per- and postoperative data were collected within the framework of the UroCCR project (NCT03293563). Univariate and multivariate analysis using regression models were performed. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients underwent RN with IVC tumor thrombus. Open and robotic surgery represented respectively 30 and 10 cases. The two groups were comparable regarding pre-operative tumor and patient characteristics. Robotic procedures were associated with lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (500 vs. 1250 mL, P=0.02), shorter Intensive Care Unit stay (2 vs. 4 days, P=0.03) and decrease of global length of stay (LOS) (7 vs. 10 days, P<0.01). Operative Time (OT) was significantly longer in the robotic group (350.5 vs. 208 min, P<0.01). No difference were observed between the two approaches regarding complications and oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic approach induced lower bleeding and shorter LOS but required longer OT. This technique is feasible and safe for selected cases and experimented surgical teams. Complications rate and oncological outcomes are not different compared to standard open procedures.

Evolution of Day-Case Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Success Rate Over Time.

Objectives: To describe the evolution of day-case success rate over the years and to identify predictive factors for prolonged hospitalization or readmissions. Methods: Retrospective review of all consecutive day-case holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) performed by a single surgeon between January 2013 and February 2019 using a prospective database. Day-case success was defined as discharge within less than 12 hours from admission without any readmission within 48 hours after discharge. Protocol for day-case treatment included systematic bladder catheter insertion with continuous irrigation for ∼2 hours and catheter removal on postoperative day 1. Patients were reached by phone on postoperative day 1 to ensure voiding. For the descriptive statistics, an analysis of variance was performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors. Results: A total of 266 patients were retrieved and dispatched as follows: group 1 (n = 88) from January 2013 to July 2015, group 2 (n = 89) from August 2015 to June 2017, and group 3 (n = 89) from July 2017 to February 2019. The overall success rate was 80.5% (214/266) over the study period. It significantly improved over time from 70% in group 1 to 84% in group 2 and 87% in group 3 (p = 0.014). In the meantime, the operating time and the total energy delivered to the tissue decreased from 77 minutes in the first group to 60.4 minutes in the second group and 55.4 minutes in the third group (p < 0.001), and from 95.2 kJ in the first group to 84 kJ in the second group and 77.9 kJ in the third group (p = 0.041). On multivariate analysis, the only risk factor significantly associated with day-case failure was prostate volume greater than 90 cc (odds ratio = 2.041, p = 0.047). Conclusion: Day-case HoLEP is a reliable and safe procedure with a high success rate. The surgeon's experience seems to be crucial to improve perioperative outcomes, but prostate volume greater than 90 cc remains associated with higher failure rates.

Risk Factors of Early Kidney Graft Transplantectomy.

BACKGROUND: Kidney allograft explant in the first month after transplant is a major concern for medicosurgical teams specialized in kidney transplantation and unacceptable graft loss in the current shortage. The aim of our study was to evaluate the risk factors of early kidney graft explant. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all adult kidney transplantations performed at our center from January 2006 to December 2011. Recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics were collected, as well as operating data and early postoperative complications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine risk factors of early renal allograft explant. RESULTS: From a total of 707 kidney transplantations, 28 transplantectomies were performed in the first month following transplantation (3.96%). The average delay in days ± SD was 7.6 ± 10. Eighty-six percent of transplantectomies were due to vascular complications. In multivariate analysis, obesity (odds ratio [OR] = 9.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63-56.5; P = .0007), range of transplantation (OR = 36.89; 95%CI, 5.5-245; P = .0006), intraoperative complications (OR = 3.99; 95%CI, 1.22-13; P = .026), and early postoperative vascular complications (OR = 85.15; 95%CI, 23.6-306; P < .0001) were independent risk factors. Neither donors nor graft characteristics were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Early renal graft transplantectomies are rare but account for 50% of renal graft loss in the first year. Because obesity, perioperative complications, and early vascular complications are independent factors associated with early transplantectomies, their prevention should be based on meticulous surgery during organ procurement, implantation of the kidney, and on the rehabilitation of future recipients.