Uncontrolled and masked uncontrolled blood pressure in treated pregnant women with chronic hypertension and risk for preeclampsia/eclampsia.

To analyze the relationship between the level of BP achieved with treatment and the risk for development of preeclampsia/eclampsia (PE), we conducted a historical cohort study on 149 consecutive pregnant women with treated chronic hypertension, evaluated between January 1, 2016, and November 31, 2022. According to office BP readings and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) performed after 20 weeks of gestation, the cohort was classified in controlled hypertension, white-coat uncontrolled hypertension, masked uncontrolled hypertension and sustained hypertension. Risks for the development of PE were estimated using logistic regression. One hundred and twenty-four pregnant women with a control BP evaluation were included in this analysis. The rates of PE were 19.4%, 27.3%, 44.8% and 47.1% for controlled, white-coat uncontrolled, masked uncontrolled and sustained uncontrolled hypertension, respectively. Compared with women with controlled hypertension, the relative risk for PE increased markedly in women with sustained uncontrolled (OR 3.69, 95% CI, 1.19-11.45) and masked uncontrolled (OR 3.38, 95% CI, 1.30-11.45) hypertension, but not in those with white-coat uncontrolled (OR 1.56 95% CI, 0.36-6.70); adjustment for covariates did not modify the results. Each mmHg higher of systolic and diastolic daytime ABPM increased the relative risk for PE ~4% and ~5%, respectively. Each mmHg higher of systolic and diastolic nocturnal BP increased the risk ~5% and ~6%, respectively. When these risks were adjusted for ABPM values in opposite periods of the day, only nocturnal ABPM remained as a significant predictor. In conclusion, masked uncontrolled hypertension implies a substantial risk for the development of PE, comparable to those of sustained uncontrolled. The presence of nocturnal hypertension seems important.

Hypertension arising after 20 weeks of gestation: gestational hypertension or masked chronic hypertension?

The objectives of this study were 1-to evaluate the prevalence of masked chronic hypertension in pregnant women classified as gestational hypertension 2-to compare the risks of developing preeclampsia in true gestational hypertension vs those women classified as having gestational hypertension but who had had masked hypertension in the first half of pregnancy. We conducted a cohort study in consecutive high-risk pregnancies who were evaluated before 20 weeks of gestation. Women who developed gestational hypertension (normotension in the office before 20 weeks of gestation and office BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and/or antihypertensive treatment in the second half of gestation) were divided, according to an ABPM performed before 20 weeks of pregnancy, in two subgroups: subgroup 1-if their ABPM was normal, and subgroup 2-if they had masked chronic hypertension. Risks for preeclampsia (PE) were estimated and compared with normotensive women. Before 20 weeks of gestation, 227 women were evaluated (age 32 ± 6 years, median gestation age 15 weeks); 67 had chronic hypertension (29.5%). Of the remaining 160, 39 developed gestational hypertension (16 in subgroup 1 and 23 insubgroup 2. Compared with normotensive pregnant women, subgroup 1 of women with gestational hypertension did not increase the risk of developing PE (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.16-6.65). Conversely, subgroup 2 of gestational hypertension increased the risk of PE more than 4 times (0R = 4.47 CI = 1.16-12.63). Risk estimation did not change substantially after the adjustment for multiple possible confounders. In conclusion, the59% of women initially diagnosed as gestational hypertensive according to current recommendations had masked chronic hypertension and a very high risk of developing PE.

Masked hypertension and neonatal outcome in high-risk pregnancies.

We previously showed that masked hypertension is a frequent finding in high-risk pregnancies and a strong predictor of preeclampsia/eclampsia. However, neonatal consequences of masked hypertension have not been deeply analyzed. Consequently, the aim of this study was to determine if masked hypertension is a risk factor for poor neonatal outcome. We evaluated a cohort of 588 high-risk pregnant women (29 ± 7 years old with 27 ± 6 weeks of gestation at blood pressure evaluation); 22.1%, 8.5%, 2.9%, and 2.6% had history of hypertension, diabetes, collagen diseases and chronic renal disease, respectively. According to the data of office and ambulatory blood pressures monitoring, women was classified as normotension (61.7%), white-coat hypertension (5.4%), masked hypertension (21.6%) and sustained hypertension (11.2%) respectively. Compared to normotension, all neonatal outcomes were worst in women with masked hypertension; neonates had lower mean birth weight (2577 (842) vs. 3079 (688) g, P < 0.001), higher prevalence of very low (12.1% vs 2.0%, P = .002) and extremely low birth weight (4.3% vs 0%, P < 0.001), and low one-minute APGAR score (7.8% vs 1.8%, P < 0.001). Furthermore, 14.2% needed admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICE) (P = 0.001). Compared with normotension the risk for poor the combined neonatal outcome (admission to NICE plus still born) was significantly higher in masked hypertension (adjusted OR 2.58 95% CI 1.23-5.40) but not in white-coat hypertension (adjusted OR 0.41 95% CI 0.05-3.12). In conclusion, in high-risk pregnancies, masked hypertension was a strong and independent predictor for poor neonatal outcomes.

Nocturnal hypertension and risk of developing early-onset preeclampsia in high-risk pregnancies.

To test the hypothesis that nocturnal hypertension identifies risk for early-onset preeclampsia/eclampsia (PE), we conducted an historical cohort study of consecutive high-risk pregnancies between 1st January 2016 and 31st March 2020. Office blood pressure (BP) measurements and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) were performed. The cohort was divided into patients without PE or with early- or late-onset PE (<34 and ≥34 weeks of gestation, respectively). The relative risks of office and ABPM hypertension for the development of late- or early-onset PE were estimated with multinomial logistic regression using no PE as a reference category. Four hundred and seventy-seven women (mean age 30 ± 7 years, with 23 ± 7 weeks of gestation at the time of the BP measurements) were analyzed; 113 (23.7%) developed PE, 69 (14.5%) developed late-onset PE, 44 (9.2%) developed early-onset PE. Office and ambulatory BP increased between the groups, and women who developed early-onset PE had significantly higher office and ambulatory BP values than those with late-onset PE or without PE. Hypertension prevalence increased across groups, with the highest values in early-onset PE. Nocturnal hypertension was the most prevalent finding and was highly prevalent in women who developed early-onset PE (88.6%); only 1.6% of women without nocturnal hypertension developed early-onset PE. Additionally, nocturnal hypertension was a stronger predictor for early-onset PE than for late-onset PE (adjusted OR, 5.26 95%CI 1.67-16.60) vs. 2.06, 95%CI 1.26-4.55, respectively). In conclusion, nocturnal hypertension was the most frequent BP abnormality and a significant predictor of early-onset PE in high-risk pregnancies.

Arterial Stiffness: Its Relation with Prediabetes and Metabolic Syndrome and Possible Pathogenesis.

AIMS: To evaluate arterial stiffness indicators in people with prediabetes (PreD) and its possible pathogenesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pulse wave velocity (PWV) was measured in 208 people with FINDRISC ≥ 13 (57 ± 8 years old, 68.7% women) and thereafter divided into those having either normal glucose tolerance (NGT) or PreD. In each subgroup we also identified those with/out insulin resistance (IR) measured by the triglyceride/HDL-c ratio (normal cut off values previously established in our population). Clinical and metabolic data were collected for all participants. PWV was compared between subgroups using independent t test. RESULTS: Women and men had comparable clinical and metabolic characteristics with obesity (BMI ≥ 30) and antihypertensive-statin treatment, almost half with either NGT or PreD. Whereas 48% of NGT people presented IR (abnormally high TG/HDL-c ratio), 52% had PreD. PWV was significantly higher only in those with a complete picture of metabolic syndrome (MS). CONCLUSIONS: Since PWV was significantly impaired in people with a complete picture of MS, clinicians must carefully search for early diagnosis of this condition and prescribe a healthy life-style to prevent development/progression of CVD. This proactive attitude would provide a cost-effective preventive strategy to avoid CVD's negative impact on patients' quality of life and on health systems due to their higher care costs.

Adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment in Argentina: A multicenter study.

Adherence to antihypertensive medication is an important challenge that doctors often face in the treatment of hypertension. Good adherence is crucial to prevent cardiovascular complications. In consequence, the present study aimed at determining the prevalence of adherence to antihypertensive treatment and identifying associated clinical variables. A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in 12 cities of Argentina. A systematic sampling was performed in order to select patients with hypertension and under pharmacological treatment for at least 6 months. Physicians took three BP measurements, and the level of adherence was assessed using the self-administered Morisky questionnaire (MMAS-8). Participants were classified into three levels of adherence: high adherence-MMAS score of 8; medium adherence-MMAS scores of 6 to <8; and low adherence-MMAS scores of <6. A total of 1111 individuals (62 ± 12 years old, women 49.4%) were included in the present analysis; 159 (14.3%), 329 (29.6%) and 623 (56.1%) patients had low, medium, and high adherence, respectively. The prevalence of controlled hypertension increased only in high adherent patients: 42.8%, 42.2%, and 64.5% for low, medium, and high adherence groups, respectively. Similarly, systolic BP was lower only in the high adherence group. High educational level (OR 3.47, 95% CI 2.68-4.49) and diuretic treatment (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.88) were independent predictors of high adherence. In conclusion, more than a half of treated hypertensive patients had a high level of adherence. These patients had lower BP values and higher control levels. A high educational level predicts high adherence.

Prevalence of isolated nocturnal hypertension according to 2018 European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Hypertension office blood pressure categories.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of isolated nocturnal hypertension (INH) and its relationships with office blood pressure (BP) categories defined by 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in consecutive patients referred to perform an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for diagnosis or therapeutic purposes. Office BP measurements and ABPM were performed in the same visit. The cohort was divided according to office BP in optimal, normal, high-normal and hypertension. The prevalence and adjusted risk for combined daytime and nocturnal hypertension and INH were estimated for each category. RESULTS: We evaluated 1344 individuals, 59.3% women (51 ±â€Š14 years old) and 40.7% men (52 ±â€Š15 years old). 61.5% of the individuals had nocturnal hypertension, 12.9% INH and 48.7% combined daytime and nocturnal hypertension. Prevalence of combined daytime and nocturnal hypertension increased through office BP categories (P < 0.001). Conversely, prevalence of INH was lower in individuals with hypertension than in normotensives (7.4 vs. 17.2%, P < 0.001) and similar between nonhypertensive office BP categories, 16.6, 15 and 19.4% for optimal, normal and high-normal BP, respectively (P < 0.399). In individuals with office BP values less than 140/90 mmHg, the prevalence of masked hypertension phenotypes were 8.6, 17.2 and 30.2% for daytime, INH and combined daytime and nocturnal hypertension, respectively. Adjusted risk for combined daytime and nocturnal hypertension increased significantly through office BP categories; conversely, the risk for INH was similar in all nonhypertensive office BP categories. CONCLUSION: Nocturnal hypertension was the more prevalent phenotype of masked hypertension and more than one-third of the individuals with nocturnal hypertension had INH. The risk for INH was not related to nonhypertensive office BP categories.

Evaluation of ventricular-arterial coupling by impedance cardiography in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: The interplay between cardiac function and the arterial system is currently defined as ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) and it is an expression of global cardiovascular efficiency. VAC involves a variety of complex interactions between the heart and the vasculature. A basic index of VAC is the ratio of effective arterial elastance (Ea)/ end-systolic elastance (Ees). While this is often done with echocardiography, obtaining Ea/Ees using impedance cardiography is feasible, although this possibility has not been explored so far. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the Ea/Ees values obtained using echocardiography and impedance cardiography. APPROACH: Two independent operators estimated Ea/Ees in 91 (41 ± 14 years old, women 51%) untreated apparently healthy individuals using (1) Doppler echocardiography with the single-beat method developed by Chen et al (2001 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 38 2028-34); and (2) data provided by impedance cardiography. The differences between Ea/Ees values were compared and correlation between both methods was estimated. MAIN RESULTS: Although Ea and Ees values calculated by impedance cardiography were lower than those estimated by echocardiography (-0.201 ± 0.457 mmHg ml-1 and -0.193 ± 0.413 mmHg ml-1), Ea/Ees ratio values were similar. Thus, there was no significant difference between the mean values of Ea/Ees estimated by impedance cardiography or echocardiography (Ea/Ees impedance cardiography - Ea/Ees echocardiography = -0.015 ± 0.096, p  = 0.150). Ea/Ees values calculated by both methods were highly correlated (r = 0.85, p  < 0.001), as well as the pre-ejection and left ventricular ejection time (r = 0.83 and r = 0.91, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE: In healthy individuals, estimation of Ea/Ees by impedance cardiography yielded similar values to those obtained using echocardiography.

Office blood pressure values and the necessity of out-of-office measurements in high-risk pregnancies.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if there is an office blood pressure (BP) value below which out-of-office measurements are unnecessary in high-risk pregnant women. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in women in the second half of high-risk pregnancies. Office BP measurements and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed. The cohort was divided according to quartiles of office BP and in normotension, white-coat hypertension, masked hypertension and sustained hypertension. The risks for preeclampsia/eclampsia for each category were estimated. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-three women (30 ±â€Š7 years with 32 ±â€Š4 weeks of gestation) were included; 69 women (18.5%) developed preeclampsia/eclampsia. Risk for preeclampsia/eclampsia increased in a stepwise manner through quartiles of systolic office BP (8.8, 13.4, 19.6 and 32.3%, P < 0.001) and diastolic office BP (6.5, 13.7, 19.6 and 34,4%, P < 0.001). OR increased significantly through quartiles of systolic (P = 0.004) and diastolic (P < 0.001) office BP; the significance becomes evident between the second and third quartile, the cut-off point between these was 125/76 mmHg. Prevalence of white-coat and masked hypertension were 3.8 and 24.7%, respectively. Using ABPM, 14/61 office hypertensive women were reclassified as white-coat hypertension but 92/312 normotensive women as masked hypertension. OR for preeclampsia/eclampsia increased significantly in women with masked hypertension. Absolute risk for preeclampsia/eclampsia in women with office BP less than 125/75 mmHg was similar than that in women with normal ABPM, 7.2 and 7.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Masked hypertension was a prevalent and high-risk condition. Office BP at least 125/75 mmHg in the second half of gestation seems appropriate to indicate out-of-office measurements in high-risk pregnancies.

Nocturnal hypertension in high-risk mid-pregnancies predict the development of preeclampsia/eclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test if hypertension detected by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) performed at mid-pregnancy, is a useful predictor for preeclampsia/eclampsia (PEEC). METHODS: The study was performed in women coursing high-risk mid-pregnancies. Office blood pressure (BP) was estimated as the mean of three values, taken by a specialized nurse after a 15-min interview, and office hypertension defined as at least 140/90 mmHg. Immediately after, an ABPM was started. Diurnal hypertension was defined as ABPM at least 135/85 mmHg during daily activities, nocturnal hypertension as ABPM at least 120/70 mmHg during night rest. The adjusted risk of PEEC was estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Eighty-seven women (mean age 31 ±â€Š7 years) with 23 ±â€Š2 weeks of pregnancy were included. The prevalence of office and ABPM hypertension was 13.8 and 40.2%, respectively. The concordance between both hypertension diagnosis was low (κ = 0.170, P = 0.044). Nocturnal hypertension (35.6%) was more frequent than diurnal hypertension (26.4%). Nocturnal hypertension markedly increased the relative risk of PEEC (OR 5.32, 95% CI 1.48-19.10). The risk of PEEC attributed to diurnal hypertension did not reach statistical significance; and when both, diurnal and nocturnal hypertension were included in the same model, only the second one was a significant predictor (P = 0.012). The relative risk associated with nocturnal hypertension increased for women not taking acetylsalicylic acid (ASA); (OR 11.40, 95% CI 2.35-55.25). CONCLUSION: Nocturnal hypertension at high-risk mid-pregnancy is a frequent condition and a strong predictor for PEEC; the risk doubled for women not taking ASA.

Could self-measured office blood pressure be a hypertension screening tool for limited-resources settings?

Blood pressure (BP) was assessed by patients themselves in recently published trials. Self-measured office blood pressure (SMOBP) seems particularly interesting for limited health resources regions. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between SMOBP values and those estimated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Six hundred seventy-seven patients were evaluated using both, SMOBP and ABPM. The differences between SMOBP and daytime ABPM were evaluated with paired "t" test. The correlations among SMOBP and ABPM were estimated using Pearson's r. The accuracy of SMOBP to identify abnormal ABPM was determined using area under ROC curve (AUC). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for different SMOBP cut-points. Using the average of three readings, systolic SMOBP was higher (3.7 (14.2) mmHg, p < 0.001) and diastolic SMOBP lower (1.5 (8.1) mmHg, p < 0.001) than ABPM. Both BP estimates had a significant correlation, r = 0.67 and r = 0.75 (p < 0.01) for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively. Systolic SMOBP predicted systolic abnormal ABPM; the AUC were 0.80 (0.77-0.84) and 0.78 (0.74-0.81) for daytime and 24 h hypertension, respectively. Diastolic SMOBP predicted diastolic hypertension, AUC 0.86 (0.83-0.88) for both daytime and 24 h hypertension. Neither correlations nor AUCs improved significantly using the average of five readings. SMOBP ≥ 160/90 mmHg was highly specific (>95%) to identify individuals with hypertension in the ABPM; SMOBP < 130/80 mmHg reasonably discarded abnormal ABPM. In conclusion, a high proportion of individuals could be classified adequately using SMOBP, reducing the necessity of healthcare resources and supporting its utility for screening purposes.

Significance of masked and nocturnal hypertension in normotensive women coursing a high-risk pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the prevalence of nocturnal and masked hypertension and the prognostic values of these blood pressure (BP) abnormalities in normotensive women coursing a high-risk pregnancy. METHODS: The study was performed in pregnant women with 20 or more weeks of gestation coursing a high-risk pregnancy, sent to a specialized hypertension department to perform a prospective defined protocol of BP evaluation. Women with office BP at least 140/90 mmHg were excluded. An ambulatory monitoring of BP was performed to identify masked and nocturnal hypertension (defined according to the current guidelines). The adjusted risk for development of preeclampsia/eclampsia (PEEC) was estimated using logistic regression. The ability of SBP and DBP to identify risk of PEEC was estimated using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Eighty-seven women (29 ±â€Š7 years old, 30 ±â€Š5 weeks of pregnancy) were included in this analysis. The prevalence of masked hypertension was 33.3%. Nocturnal hypertension was found in 42.5% of the women. Remarkably, 27.0% of the women with nocturnal hypertension had normal 24-h values according to ambulatory BP monitoring. Twenty-two patients developed PEEC; adjusted relative risks increased with the presence of nocturnal (odds ratio = 4.72, 95% confidence interval 1.25-19.43, P = 0.023) or masked hypertension (odds ratio = 7.81, 95% confidence interval 2.6-22.86, P = 0.001). Nocturnal SBP and DBP had the highest abilities to predict PEEC (area under the curve = 0.77 and 0.80, respectively). CONCLUSION: Masked and nocturnal hypertension are frequent findings in normotensive women coursing a high-risk pregnancy, and their presence implies an increased risk to develop PEEC.

Use of the plasma triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio to identify cardiovascular disease in hypertensive subjects.

This analysis evaluated the hypothesis that the plasma triglyceride (TG)/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration ratio can help identify patients with essential hypertension who are insulin-resistant, with the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profile associated with that defect. Data from a community-based study developed between 2003 and 2012 were used to compare CVD risk factors and outcome. Plasma TG/HDL-C cut-points of 2.5 (women) and 3.5 (men) subdivided normotensive (n = 574) and hypertensive (n = 373) subjects into "high" and "low" risk groups. Metabolic syndrome criteria (MetS) were also used to identify "high" and "low" risk groups. The baseline cardio-metabolic profile was significantly more adverse in 2003 in "high" risk subgroups, irrespective of BP classification or definition of risk (TG/HDL-C ratio vs. MetS criteria). Crude incidence of combined CVD events increased across risk groups, ranging from 1.9 in normotensive-low TG/HDL-C subjects to 19.9 in hypertensive-high TG/HDL-C ratio individuals (P for trends <.001). Adjusted hazard ratios for CVD events also increased with both hypertension and TG/HDL-C. Comparable findings were seen when CVD outcome was predicted by MetS criteria. The TG/HDL-C concentration ratio and the MetS criteria identify to a comparable degree hypertensive subjects who are at greatest cardio-metabolic risk and develop significantly more CVD.

Do differences in waist circumference modify the relationships among body mass index, insulin resistance, and related cardiometabolic risk factors in apparently healthy women?

OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to (1) compare the cardiometabolic risk profile between insulin-resistant and non-insulin-resistant women within similar body mass indexes (BMIs) and waist circumference (WC) groupings and (2) test the hypothesis that measurements of BMI are not inferior to WC in identifying insulin resistance. METHODS: The sample consisted of 899 women without known cardiovascular disease or diabetes. BMI was used to divide participants in normal (<25.0 kg/m(2)), overweight (≥25-29.9 kg/m(2)), and obese (≥30.0 kg/m(2)) subgroups, and waist circumference ≥88 cm was used to identify women with or without abdominal obesity. The 25% of the population with highest fasting insulin concentrations was classified as insulin resistant. BMI, WC, blood pressure, and fasting plasma glucose, insulin, triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were compared using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The relationships between obesity and insulin resistance were analyzed using univariate, multivariate, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Triglyceride and glucose concentrations were higher and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations lower in the insulin-resistant group in each BMI category, as was the case when comparing by abdominal obesity. In the univariate analysis, correlations between obesity and the individual cardiometabolic risk factor were significant but weak. In multivariate analysis including both indices, only body mass independently predicted insulin resistance. CONCLUSION: Insulin-resistant women were at greater cardiometabolic risk, irrespective of adiposity category. Obesity contributed to a modest variability in insulin resistance, and abdominal obesity does not add to the ability of BMI to predict insulin resistance.

Blood pressure response to a community-based program and long-term cardiovascular outcome.

BACKGROUND: The significance in terms of the cardiovascular outcome of different patterns of blood pressure (BP) response to community-based activities has not been previously studied. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between changes of BP observed during a community-based program and long-term rate of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. METHODS: A program focused on the prevention of CVDs was implemented in a small city in Argentina over a 6-year period (1997-2003). The program was evaluated using a cohort of 1,526 randomly selected individuals. The population's mean systolic BP (SBP) decreased approximately 5mm Hg, but BP changes were heterogeneous. Eight years after the intervention had stopped, 1,124 individuals of the cohort were surveyed to evaluate incident CVD events. The sample was divided into 3 SBP change categories during the intervention: decrease (< -5mm Hg), no change (-5 to 5mm Hg) and increase (> 5mm Hg). Cox models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of CVD events for each category adjusted for age, sex, and baseline BP. RESULTS: At the end of the intervention, individuals who had increased their SBP showed an adjusted HR for CVD that was double those whose SBP levels decreased or did not change. An inverse relationship between baseline SBP and ΔSBP was observed: individuals with an increase in BP during the intervention had lower SBP at the beginning of the study. CONCLUSIONS: BP increase during the community-based program was an independent predictor of CVD events.

Comparison of the abilities of the plasma triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and the metabolic syndrome to identify insulin resistance.

This study compares the ability of an elevated triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) ratio, using sex-specific cut-points, to identify insulin-resistant individuals within a population without known cardiac disease or diabetes with that obtained using the diagnostic criteria of the metabolic syndrome (MetS). Measurements were made of waist circumference (WC), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, fasting plasma insulin (FPI), plasma TG and plasma HDL-C concentrations in 1102 women and 464 men. These data were used to classify subjects as being insulin resistant (FPI concentration in the upper quartile) and having the MetS or an elevated TG/HDL-C ratio (>2.5 and >3.5 for women and men, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity with which the two indices identified insulin-resistant subjects were similar (43% and 81% for TG/HDL-C ratio and 45% and 82% for MetS), as the number of individuals was found with either an elevated TG/HDL-C ratio (n = 386) or the MetS (n = 384). Eighty-one per cent of the individuals were identified concordantly. Cardio-metabolic risk profiles in 'low-risk' individuals identified by a low TG/HDL-C ratio were comparable to those who did not have the MetS, and this was also the case when comparing 'high-risk' groups identified by having the MetS or an elevated TG/HDL-C ratio. These findings suggest that TG/HDL-C concentration ratio is as adequate as MetS diagnosis to identify insulin-resistant subjects.

Relation among the plasma triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration ratio, insulin resistance, and associated cardio-metabolic risk factors in men and women.

Results of recent studies using the ratio of plasma triglyceride (TG) to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration to identify insulin-resistant patients at increased cardiometabolic risk have emphasized that the cut point used for this purpose will vary with race. Because TG and HDL cholesterol concentrations vary with gender, this analysis was initiated to define gender-specific plasma TG/HDL cholesterol concentration ratios that best identified high-risk subjects among women (n = 1,102) and men (n = 464) of primarily European ancestry. Insulin resistance was defined as the 25% of the population with the highest values for fasting plasma insulin concentration and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. Using TG/HDL concentration ratios >2.5 in women and >3.5 in men identified subgroups of men and women that were comparable in terms of insulin resistance and associated cardiometabolic risk, with significantly higher values for fasting plasma insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, and glucose and TG concentrations and lower HDL cholesterol concentrations than in women and men below these cut points. The sensitivity and specificity of these gender-specific cut points to identify insulin-resistant subjects were about 40% and about 80%, respectively. In conclusion, the plasma TG/HDL cholesterol concentration ratio that identifies patients who are insulin resistant and at significantly greater cardiometabolic risk varies between men and women.

Optimal uric acid threshold to identify insulin resistance in healthy women.

BACKGROUND: Identifying insulin-resistant (IR) individuals is an issue of particular interest in the assessment of cardiometabolic risk, but there is no simple way to accomplish this task. Our aims were to determine the relationship between uric acid and insulin resistance and to define the optimal uric acid cutoff to identify insulin resistance in women. METHODS: A population-based sample of 588 women without cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, or low glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was divided according to uric acid tertiles. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), fasting glucose, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), TG/HDL-C ratio, insulin [fasting plasma insulin (FPI)], and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were compared between the mentioned tertiles. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determinate the optimal cutoff of uric acid and identify IR individuals defined by the top tertile of FPI and HOMA-IR. The same variables were compared using the top tertile of uric acid and the maximum Youden index as cutoffs. The P values were adjusted by age, GFR, and body mass index (BMI) using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). RESULTS: FPI, HOMA-IR, and all of the cardiometabolic risk factors increased through uric acid tertiles. Both cutoffs of uric acid, estimated by the top tertile and by ROC, were identical (4.0 mg/dL). FPI, HOMA-IR, SBP, DBP, TG, TG/HDL-C ratio, and fasting glucose were higher, whereas HDL-C was lower in women who had uric acid levels >4.0 mg/dL. All of the differences remained significant after the adjustment by age and GFR. CONCLUSION: In healthy women, uric acid levels >4.0 mg/dL were associated with all the markers of IR.