ABSTRACT
Since 1996, the Hospital del Tórax Dr. Antonio A. Centrángolo conducts a pulmonary rehabilitation program that requires patients with chronic pulmonary disease to attend the hospital twice a week. In 2015 the home-based program (HBP) was developed for patients living more than either 10 km or 60 minutes away from the hospital, or with conflicting working schedules. A retrospective study was conducted to describe the adherence to the home-based program by patients with chronic pulmonary disease, and explore adherence-related factors. In 2017, 96 (75.6%) of 127 patients eligible for pulmonary rehabilitation were assigned to the home-based program; they were instructed to complete at least three exercise sessions a week -including aerobic and resistance, segmental strength of upper and lower limbs, and flexibility-; and attend hospital visits every 20 to 30 days; "adherence to the HBP" was determined for patients who attended their final assessment on the fifth visit. A 40.6% (n = 39) of the patients only attended the first visit; 23% (n = 22) adhered to the program. This latter group of patients had shown, at their first assessment, better FVCs (p = 0.013), lower dyspnea scores (p = 0.008), and less than two or more exacerbations during the previous 6 months (p = 0.032). Only one patient needed to take three or more different transportation services to reach the hospital (p = 0.006). The results suggest that adherence to the home-based program was associated to a better clinical status and better access to the hospital.
Desde 1996, el Hospital del Tórax Dr. Antonio A. Cetrángolo aplica un programa de rehabilitación respiratoria, el cual requiere la concurrencia al hospital, dos veces por semana, de los pacientes con enfermedad respiratoria crónica. En 2015, se desarrolló el programa domiciliario (PD) para pacientes que viven a más de 10 km del hospital, o necesitan más de 60 minutos de viaje, o trabajan y tienen incompatibilidad de horarios con el programa hospitalario. Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo con el objetivo de describir la adherencia al programa domiciliario de pacientes con enfermedad respiratoria crónica y explorar los factores relacionados. En 2017, 96 de 127 (75.6%) pacientes elegibles para rehabilitación respiratoria fueron asignados al programa domiciliario y se les indicó cumplimentar al menos tres sesiones semanales de ejercicios de resistencia aeróbica, fuerza segmentaria de miembros superiores e inferiores y flexibilidad; y concurrir al hospital cada 20 o 30 días; a la quinta visita se realizó la reevaluación. Se consideró "adherencia al PD " cuando el paciente completaba la misma. El 40.6% (n = 39) solo asistió a la evaluación inicial y un 23% (n = 22) adhirió al programa. El grupo adherente presentó, al inicio, mejor FVC (p = 0.013), menor score de disnea (p = 0.008), menos de dos o más exacerbaciones en los seis meses previos (p = 0.032). Un solo paciente necesitaba tres o más transportes para llegar al hospital (p = 0.006). Los resultados sugieren que la adherencia al programa domiciliario se relacionó con mejor situación clínica y mejor accesibilidad a la institución.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Treatment Adherence and Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Female , Home Care Services , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
Desde 1996, el Hospital del Tórax Dr. Antonio A. Cetrángolo aplica un programa de rehabilitación respiratoria, el cual requiere la concurrencia al hospital, dos veces por semana, de los pacientes con enfermedad respiratoria crónica. En 2015, se desarrolló el programa domiciliario (PD) para pacientes que viven a más de 10 km del hospital, o necesitan más de 60 minutos de viaje, o trabajan y tienen incompatibilidad de horarios con el programa hospitalario. Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo con el objetivo de describir la adherencia al programa domiciliario de pacientes con enfermedad respiratoria crónica y explorar los factores relacionados. En 2017, 96 de 127 (75.6%) pacientes elegibles para rehabilitación respiratoria fueron asignados al programa domiciliario y se les indicó cumplimentar al menos tres sesiones semanales de ejercicios de resistencia aeróbica, fuerza segmentaria de miembros superiores e inferiores y flexibilidad; y concurrir al hospital cada 20 o 30 días; a la quinta visita se realizó la reevaluación. Se consideró "adherencia al PD" cuando el paciente completaba la misma. El 40.6% (n = 39) solo asistió a la evaluación inicial y un 23% (n = 22) adhirió al programa. El grupo adherente presentó, al inicio, mejor FVC (p = 0.013), menor score de disnea (p = 0.008), menos de dos o más exacerbaciones en los seis meses previos (p = 0.032). Un solo paciente necesitaba tres o más transportes para llegar al hospital (p = 0.006). Los resultados sugieren que la adherencia al programa domiciliario se relacionó con mejor situación clínica y mejor accesibilidad a la institución.
Since 1996, the Hospital del Tórax Dr. Antonio A. Centrángolo conducts a pulmonary rehabilitation program that requires patients with chronic pulmonary disease to attend the hospital twice a week. In 2015 the home-based program (HBP) was developed for patients living more than either 10 km or 60 minutes away from the hospital, or with conflicting working schedules. A retrospective study was conducted to describe the adherence to the home-based program by patients with chronic pulmonary disease, and explore adherence-related factors. In 2017, 96 (75.6%) of 127 patients eligible for pulmonary rehabilitation were assigned to the home-based program; they were instructed to complete at least three exercise sessions a week -including aerobic and resistance, segmental strength of upper and lower limbs, and flexibility-; and attend hospital visits every 20 to 30 days; "adherence to the HBP" was determined for patients who attended their final assessment on the fifth visit. A 40.6% (n = 39) of the patients only attended the first visit; 23% (n = 22) adhered to the program. This latter group of patients had shown, at their first assessment, better FVCs (p = 0.013), lower dyspnea scores (p = 0.008), and less than two or more exacerbations during the previous 6 months (p = 0.032). Only one patient needed to take three or more different transportation services to reach the hospital (p = 0.006). The results suggest that adherence to the home-based program was associated to a better clinical status and better access to the hospital.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Treatment Adherence and Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Retrospective Studies , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based , Home Care ServicesABSTRACT
La Rehabilitación Respiratoria (RR), dirigida a las personas con enfermedad respiratoria crónica, reduce las exacerbaciones y hospitalizaciones, mejora los síntomas, la tolerancia al ejercicio y calidad de vida. Miembros de la Sección de RR de la Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria, se reunieron con el objetivo de preguntarse cuáles son los temas principales de controversia para dar respuesta desde la medicina basada en evidencia (sistema GRADE). Se eligieron diez preguntas. Resultados: La RR se debe indicar en pacientes con EPOC estadio GOLD 1 (1C). La adherencia es fundamental y se relaciona a sus beneficios (1C). La actividad física debe ser evaluada y estimulada (1B). Los beneficios de la RR dentro del mes posterior a una exacerbación de EPOC, reduce los síntomas y exacerbaciones y mejora la calidad de vida (1B). La RR está indicada en algunas enfermedades respiratorias crónicas no-EPOC (1B). Se deben indicar estrategias de entrenamiento especiales en desnutridos (3B) y obesos (3C). Los pacientes deben ser evaluados con prueba de ejercicio, escalas de disnea y calidad de vida (1A). El rol del entrenador de salud es novedoso ya que disminuye hospitalizaciones y mejora la calidad de vida (2C). Las comorbilidades afectan el resultado de la RR (3B). La RR reduce la mortalidad (1B) y la ansiedad-depresión (2B). La RR domiciliaria es efectiva (1A). La RR es fundamental en el tratamiento de enfermedades respiratorias crónicas. Se han actualizado las recomendaciones en RR en base a la evidencia científica con el objetivo que la RR pueda aplicarse en nuestro país.
Respiratory Rehabilitation (RR) is indicated in patients with chronic pulmonary diseases to reduce exacerbations and hospitalizations, and to improve symptoms, exercise tolerance and quality of life. Members of RR Section of the Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria, joined to review critical issues and controversies by an evidence-based system (GRADE). Ten questions were elected.213 Results: RR must be indicated in GOLD 1 COPD (1C). Adherence in RR is critical and related to benefits (1C). Physical activity must be evaluated and stimulated (1B). RR implemented after one month of COPD exacerbation hospitalization, reduces symptoms and exacerbations and improves quality of life(1B). RR is indicated in some no-COPD chronic respiratory diseases (1B). Special training strategies must be used in undernourished (3B) and obeses patients (3C). Exercise tests, dyspnea and quality of life questionnaires must be used to evaluate patients (1A). Health trainer is an original strategy to reduce hospitalizations and improve quality of life (2C). Comorbilities impacts on RR outcomes (3B). RR reduces mortality (1B) and ansiety-depression (2B). Domiciliary RR is efective (1A). RR is a key component of chronic pulmonary diseases treatment. Based in new scientific evidence, local recomendations have been done regarding to improve access in our country.
Subject(s)
Rehabilitation , Respiratory Tract Diseases , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveABSTRACT
Participation in a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program (PRP) improves dyspnea, functional capacity and quality of life in patients with chronic respiratory disease. A retrospective study was carried out to identify variables related to compliance in an out patient PRP at an Argentine center and to evaluate the results in compliant patients. The PRP included an "acquisition" stage consisting of 16 weeks of supervised training twice weekly and lectures on treatment benefits, inhalation devices used, smoking cessation, symptoms recognition and flair up management, among others. Patients were reassessed after this stage. Patients completing the acquisition stage were considered PRP compliant. Of 388 patients evaluated for admission 102 (26.3%) complied with PRP. Multiple logistic regression analysis (Forward Stepwise; p < 0.10 to be eligible for entry into the model) was used to identify factors related to "program compliance". The final model was as follows: having health insurance coverage (OR = 3.99; CI90% = 2.24-7.12), commute time under 60 minutes (OR = 2.07; CI90% = 1.37-3.11) and financial capacity (OR = 2.11; CI90% = 1.03-4.31). All patients complied with the PRP showed significant improvement in the six-minute walking test and quality of life. The results warn about low compliance and their relationship with socioeconomic variables.
Subject(s)
Dyspnea/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy/methods , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
La participación en un Programa de Rehabilitación Respiratoria (PRR) mejora la disnea, la capacidad funcional y la calidad de vida en pacientes con enfermedad respiratoria crónica. Sin embargo, la adherencia a PRR suele ser baja. Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo con el objetivo de identificar variables relacionadas con la adherencia a un PRR ambulatorio en un centro de la Argentina y secundariamente evaluar los resultados en quienes adhirieron. El PRR incluyó una etapa de "adquisición" que consistió en 16 semanas de entrenamiento físico supervisado, dos veces por semana, y clases sobre los beneficios del tratamiento, el uso de los dispositivos de inhalación, cesación tabáquica, reconocimiento de síntomas y manejo de las exacerbaciones, entre otros. Al finalizar el entrenamiento los pacientes fueron re-evaluados. Se consideró "adherencia al PRR" cuando el paciente completó la etapa de adquisición. De 388 pacientes que iniciaron la primera evaluación, 102 (26.3%) adhirieron al PRR. Se utilizó regresión logística múltiple (Forward Stepwise con ingreso de variables con p < 0.10) para identificar factores relacionados con "adherencia al programa". El modelo final fue el siguiente: poseer obra social (OR = 3.99; IC90% = 2.24-7.12), tiempo de viaje al hospital menor de 60 minutos (OR = 2.07; IC90% = 1.37-3.11) e ingreso económico disponible (OR = 2.11; IC90% = 1.03-4.31). Los pacientes que adhirieron al PRR presentaron mejoría significativa en la prueba de marcha de 6 minutos y en la calidad de vida. Los resultados alertan sobre la baja adherencia y su relación con las variables socioeconómicas.
Participation in a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program (PRP) improves dyspnea, functional capacity and quality of life in patients with chronic respiratory disease. A retrospective study was carried out to identify variables related to compliance in an out patient PRP at an Argentine center and to evaluate the results in compliant patients. The PRP included an "acquisition" stage consisting of 16 weeks of supervised training twice weekly and lectures on treatment benefits, inhalation devices used, smoking cessation, symptoms recognition and flair up management, among others. Patients were reassessed after this stage. Patients completing the acquisition stage were considered PRP compliant. Of 388 patients evaluated for admission 102 (26.3%) complied with PRP. Multiple logistic regression analysis (Forward Stepwise; p < 0.10 to be eligible for entry into the model) was used to identify factors related to "program compliance". The final model was as follows: having health insurance coverage (OR = 3.99; CI90% = 2.24-7.12), commute time under 60minutes (OR = 2.07; CI90% = 1.37-3.11) and financial capacity (OR = 2.11; CI90% = 1.03-4.31). All patients complied with the PRP showed significant improvement in the six-minute walking test and quality of life. The results warn about low compliance and their relationship with socioeconomic variables.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Dyspnea/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy/methods , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
La participación en un Programa de Rehabilitación Respiratoria (PRR) mejora la disnea, la capacidad funcional y la calidad de vida en pacientes con enfermedad respiratoria crónica. Sin embargo, la adherencia a PRR suele ser baja. Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo con el objetivo de identificar variables relacionadas con la adherencia a un PRR ambulatorio en un centro de la Argentina y secundariamente evaluar los resultados en quienes adhirieron. El PRR incluyó una etapa de "adquisición" que consistió en 16 semanas de entrenamiento físico supervisado, dos veces por semana, y clases sobre los beneficios del tratamiento, el uso de los dispositivos de inhalación, cesación tabáquica, reconocimiento de síntomas y manejo de las exacerbaciones, entre otros. Al finalizar el entrenamiento los pacientes fueron re-evaluados. Se consideró "adherencia al PRR" cuando el paciente completó la etapa de adquisición. De 388 pacientes que iniciaron la primera evaluación, 102 (26.3%) adhirieron al PRR. Se utilizó regresión logística múltiple (Forward Stepwise con ingreso de variables con p < 0.10) para identificar factores relacionados con "adherencia al programa". El modelo final fue el siguiente: poseer obra social (OR = 3.99; IC90% = 2.24-7.12), tiempo de viaje al hospital menor de 60 minutos (OR = 2.07; IC90% = 1.37-3.11) e ingreso económico disponible (OR = 2.11; IC90% = 1.03-4.31). Los pacientes que adhirieron al PRR presentaron mejoría significativa en la prueba de marcha de 6 minutos y en la calidad de vida. Los resultados alertan sobre la baja adherencia y su relación con las variables socioeconómicas.(AU)
Participation in a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program (PRP) improves dyspnea, functional capacity and quality of life in patients with chronic respiratory disease. A retrospective study was carried out to identify variables related to compliance in an out patient PRP at an Argentine center and to evaluate the results in compliant patients. The PRP included an "acquisition" stage consisting of 16 weeks of supervised training twice weekly and lectures on treatment benefits, inhalation devices used, smoking cessation, symptoms recognition and flair up management, among others. Patients were reassessed after this stage. Patients completing the acquisition stage were considered PRP compliant. Of 388 patients evaluated for admission 102 (26.3%) complied with PRP. Multiple logistic regression analysis (Forward Stepwise; p < 0.10 to be eligible for entry into the model) was used to identify factors related to "program compliance". The final model was as follows: having health insurance coverage (OR = 3.99; CI90% = 2.24-7.12), commute time under 60minutes (OR = 2.07; CI90% = 1.37-3.11) and financial capacity (OR = 2.11; CI90% = 1.03-4.31). All patients complied with the PRP showed significant improvement in the six-minute walking test and quality of life. The results warn about low compliance and their relationship with socioeconomic variables.(AU)
ABSTRACT
Participation in a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program (PRP) improves dyspnea, functional capacity and quality of life in patients with chronic respiratory disease. A retrospective study was carried out to identify variables related to compliance in an out patient PRP at an Argentine center and to evaluate the results in compliant patients. The PRP included an "acquisition" stage consisting of 16 weeks of supervised training twice weekly and lectures on treatment benefits, inhalation devices used, smoking cessation, symptoms recognition and flair up management, among others. Patients were reassessed after this stage. Patients completing the acquisition stage were considered PRP compliant. Of 388 patients evaluated for admission 102 (26.3
) complied with PRP. Multiple logistic regression analysis (Forward Stepwise; p < 0.10 to be eligible for entry into the model) was used to identify factors related to "program compliance". The final model was as follows: having health insurance coverage (OR = 3.99; CI90
= 2.24-7.12), commute time under 60 minutes (OR = 2.07; CI90
= 1.37-3.11) and financial capacity (OR = 2.11; CI90
= 1.03-4.31). All patients complied with the PRP showed significant improvement in the six-minute walking test and quality of life. The results warn about low compliance and their relationship with socioeconomic variables.
ABSTRACT
Respiratory rehabilitation (RR) is a multidisciplinary program of care for patients with chronic respiratory impairment, individually tailored, designed to optimize physical and social performance and patient autonomy. It is particularly indicated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with exercise intolerance. The objectives of respiratory rehabilitation are: reduction in symptoms and exercise intolerance, improvement of health-related quality of life, and reduction of health costs. A group of neumonologists, nutritionists and physical therapists performed a systematic review of the evidence in RR to update previous local guidelines. Inclusion and exclusion criteria, guidelines for initial evaluation and follow up and resources needed are defined. Training characteristics are recommended regarding frequency of the visits, intensity, progression and duration of the exercise training. Aerobic training was recommended for lower limb (1A), upper limb (1B). Strength training must be added (1B). Respiratory muscle training and other physiotherapy techniques were recommended only for specific patients (1C). In addition recommendations have been made for educational objectives of the program including smoking cessation, nutritional and psychological support. The positive impact of RR on reductions of health care costs and reductions on hospitalizations (Evidence A) and mortality (Evidence B) were analized. Respiratory rehabilitation is a key component in the modern treatment of COPD patients. This consensus statement was prepared based on the most recent scientific evidence and adjusted to the local environment with the aim of being implemented nationally.
Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/standards , Exercise Tolerance/physiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Argentina , Disability Evaluation , Forms and Records Control , Humans , Patient Education as Topic , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
La rehabilitación respiratoria (RR) es un tratamiento multidisciplinario para pacientes con enfermedad respiratoria crónica, adaptado individualmente y diseñado para optimizar la capacidad física, la actividad social y la autonomía de los mismos. Está especialmente indicado en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC). Los objetivos de la RR son: reducir los síntomas, mejorar la tolerancia al ejercicio físico y la calidad de vida. Un grupo de neumonólogos, nutricionistas y kinesiólogos realizó un análisis sistemàtico de la evidencia científica con el objetivo de actualizar las normativas anteriores de RR. Se definieron los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, la evaluación inicial y de seguimiento como así también los elementos y material necesarios. Las características del entrenamiento en cuanto a la frecuencia de las visitas, la intensidad, progresión y duración del ejercicio han sido revisadas. Se recomendó el entrenamiento de los miembros inferiores (1A), miembros superiores (1B), complementando el entrenamiento de fuerza (1B). El entrenamiento de músculos respiratorios, otras técnicas kinesiológicas y pautas nutricionales se recomiendan sólo para casos particulares (1C). Se fijan también objetivos educativos para los programas de rehabilitación que incluyen la cesación de fumar, aspectos nutricionales y apoyo psicológico. La RR ha demostrado reducir las exacerbaciones, hospitalizaciones y costos (Evidencia A), y mejoraría la sobrevida (Evidencia B). La RR es un componente fundamental en el tratamiento moderno de la EPOC. Estas pautas basadas en la más reciente evidencia científica, adaptadas al medio local tienen por objetivo que la RR pueda aplicarse en todo el país.
Respiratory rehabilitation (RR) is a multidisciplinary program of care for patients with chronic respiratory impairment, individually tailored, designed to optimize physical and social performance and patient autonomy. It is particularly indicated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with exercise intolerance. The objectives of respiratory rehabilitation are: reduction in symptoms and exercise intolerance, improvement of health-related quality of life, and reduction of health costs. A group of neumonologists, nutritionists and physical therapists performed a systematic review of the evidence in RR to update previous local guidelines. Inclusion and exclusion criteria, guidelines for initial evaluation and follow up and resources needed are defined. Training characteristics are recommended regarding frequency of the visits, intensity, progression and duration of the exercise training. Aerobic training was recommended for lower limb (1A), upper limb (1B). Strength training must be added (1B). Respiratory muscle training and other physiotherapy techniques were recommended only for specific patients (1C). In addition recommendations have been made for educational objectives of the program including smoking cessation, nutritional and psychological support. The positive impact of RR on reductions of health care costs and reductions on hospitalizations (Evidence A) and mortality (Evidence B) were analized. Respiratory rehabilitation is a key component in the modern treatment of COPD patients. This consensus statement was prepared based on the most recent scientific evidence and adjusted to the local environment with the aim of being implemented nationally.
Subject(s)
Humans , Exercise Therapy/standards , Exercise Tolerance/physiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Argentina , Disability Evaluation , Forms and Records Control , Patient Education as Topic , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
A group of pulmonologists and physical therapists from the Asociacion Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria revised the scientific literature on Respiratory Rehabilitation (RR) to elaborate evidence-based national recommendations to promote its use. RR is a multidisciplinary program of care for patients with chronic respiratory impairment, individually tailored, designed to optimize physical and social performance and autonomy of patients. It is particularly indicated in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with exercise intolerance. Inclusion and exclusion criteria, guidelines for initial evaluation and follow up have been defined. The resources needed were defined. It was recommended a hospital ambulatory program with domiciliary complement. A pulmonologist and physical therapist were required for the program as minimum. Aerobic training was recommended for lower limb (LL) (Evidence A) and upper limb (UL) (Evidence B), strength training for LL and UL (Evidence C), as well as respiratory muscles training by resistive inspiratory threshold load (Evidence D) and other physiotherapy techniques were recommended for specific patients. In addition recommendations have been made for educational objectives of the program, nutritional and psychological support. The positive impact of RR on health care was analyzed through the reduction in exacerbation of COPD, length of hospital stay and cost. RR is a key component in the treatment of COPD patients. This evidenced-based consensus statement was prepared to provide recommendations to be implemented nationally.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Argentina , HumansABSTRACT
A group of pulmonologists and physical therapists from the Asociacion Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria revised the scientific literature on Respiratory Rehabilitation (RR) to elaborate evidence-based national recommendations to promote its use. RR is a multidisciplinary program of care for patients with chronic respiratory impairment, individually tailored, designed to optimize physical and social performance and autonomy of patients. It is particularly indicated in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with exercise intolerance. Inclusion and exclusion criteria, guidelines for initial evaluation and follow up have been defined. The resources needed were defined. It was recommended a hospital ambulatory program with domiciliary complement. A pulmonologist and physical therapist were required for the program as minimum. Aerobic training was recommended for lower limb (LL) (Evidence A) and upper limb (UL) (Evidence B), strength training for LL and UL (Evidence C), as well as respiratory muscles training by resistive inspiratory threshold load (Evidence D) and other physiotherapy techniques were recommended for specific patients. In addition recommendations have been made for educational objectives of the program, nutritional and psychological support. The positive impact of RR on health care was analyzed through the reduction in exacerbation of COPD, length of hospital stay and cost. RR is a key component in the treatment of COPD patients. This evidenced-based consensus statement was prepared to provide recommendations to be implemented nationally.
ABSTRACT
Un grupo de neumonólogos y kinesiólogos asociados a la Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria se reinieron con el objetivo de revisar la evidencia científica en Rehabilitacíón Respiratoria (RR), elaborar recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia para su aplicación local y promover su uso. RR es um programa multidisciplinario para el cuidado de pacientes con una alteración respiratoria crónica, ajustado individualmente, con el objetivo de lograr el máximo de actividad física, social y la independencia funcional de paciente a través de la actividad física supervisada. La RR está particularmente indicada en pacientes con Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica (EPOC) que presentem intolerancia al esfuerzo. Se han definidi los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, las mínimas pautas de evaluaíón y cómo realizar el control posterior a la RR. Se elaboraron normativas sobre los recursos para montar un programa. Se recomendó un programa ambulatorio hospitalario con complemento domiciliario, y al personal mínimo necesario (un neumonólogo y un kinesiólogo). Se recomendó para todos los pacientes el entrenamiento aeróbico de resistencia para miembros inferiores (MI) (Evidencia A) y de miembros superiores (MS) (Evidencia B), de fuerza de MI y MS (Evidencia C), como así también para determinados pacientes el entrenamiento muscular respiratorio a carga resistiva umbral inspiratoria (Evidencia D), y otras técnicas kinésicas. Se hicieron recomendaciones sobre los objetivos educativos, apoyo nutricional y psicológico en todo programa de RR. El beneficio de la RR también fue analizado a través de la reducción de las exacerbaciones, hospitalizaciones y costos para el sitema de salud de los programas de RR. La RR es un componente fundamental del tratamiento de un paciente con EPOC. Este Consenso ha elaborado recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia para ser aplicada a nivel local.
Subject(s)
Humans , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , ArgentinaABSTRACT
Un grupo de neumonólogos y kinesiólogos asociados a la Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria se reinieron con el objetivo de revisar la evidencia científica en Rehabilitacíón Respiratoria (RR), elaborar recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia para su aplicación local y promover su uso. RR es um programa multidisciplinario para el cuidado de pacientes con una alteración respiratoria crónica, ajustado individualmente, con el objetivo de lograr el máximo de actividad física, social y la independencia funcional de paciente a través de la actividad física supervisada. La RR está particularmente indicada en pacientes con Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica (EPOC) que presentem intolerancia al esfuerzo. Se han definidi los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, las mínimas pautas de evaluaíón y cómo realizar el control posterior a la RR. Se elaboraron normativas sobre los recursos para montar un programa. Se recomendó un programa ambulatorio hospitalario con complemento domiciliario, y al personal mínimo necesario (un neumonólogo y un kinesiólogo). Se recomendó para todos los pacientes el entrenamiento aeróbico de resistencia para miembros inferiores (MI) (Evidencia A) y de miembros superiores (MS) (Evidencia B), de fuerza de MI y MS (Evidencia C), como así también para determinados pacientes el entrenamiento muscular respiratorio a carga resistiva umbral inspiratoria (Evidencia D), y otras técnicas kinésicas. Se hicieron recomendaciones sobre los objetivos educativos, apoyo nutricional y psicológico en todo programa de RR. El beneficio de la RR también fue analizado a través de la reducción de las exacerbaciones, hospitalizaciones y costos para el sitema de salud de los programas de RR. La RR es un componente fundamental del tratamiento de un paciente con EPOC. Este Consenso ha elaborado recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia para ser aplicada a nivel local. (AU)