Preoperative coagulation tests: A narrative review of current guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: Hemostasis tests are traditionally requested for all patients requiring any surgical act or invasive diagnostic-therapeutic procedure to prevent hemorrhagic complications. The aim of this study is to assess the necessity of requesting standard pre-procedure hemostasis tests. METHODOLOGY: A narrative literature review was conducted using the PubMed data-base. Search terms included «Hemostasis¼ or «Blood coagulation¼ in combination with «Preoperative care¼, «Preoperative period¼, or «Preoperative procedure¼. Additionally, a targeted search was performed to find recommendations from international societies related to the topic. RESULTS: A total of 233 articles were found, 17 were pre-selected, and after full-text evaluation, 14 relevant articles were identified. The targeted search yielded an additional 12 articles. The request for tests should be individualized according to the clinical history. Standardized screening questionnaires for hemostasis disorders are useful and complement the aforementioned approach. Factors such as age, ASA classification, bleeding potential-complexity of the procedure, and anesthetic technique may influence their request. DISCUSSION: The incidence of hemostasis disorders in the general population is very low, and these can mostly be detected through clinical history. Thus, it is the clinical history that should guide the need for laboratory test requests. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative hemostasis tests should not be indiscriminately requested for all patients needing an intervention or invasive diagnostic-therapeutic procedure, but rather when there are doubts about their hemostatic competence or as advised by the nature of the procedure they are undergoing.

Coloides perioperatorios: de la teoría a la práctica / Perioperative colloids: From theory to practice

Introducción: La administración intravenosa de fluidos constituye un elemento fundamental en la reanimación de pacientes con hipovolemia. Las guías clínicas restringen el uso de coloides en favor de los cristaloides. Actualmente, no conocemos con exactitud cuál es la práctica clínica habitual al respecto durante el periodo perioperatorio. El objetivo del presente estudio es describir el uso perioperatorio de coloides y analizar las posibles causas que motivan su utilización. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional, transversal, multicéntrico. Subanálisis del estudio Fluid Day. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes mayores de 18 años sometidos a cirugía durante las 24h de los 2 días del estudio (18 y 20 de febrero de 2019). Se registraron datos demográficos, comorbilidades, datos referentes al acto anestésico y el procedimiento quirúrgico, fluidos administrados, sangrado perioperatorio y tipo de monitorización utilizado durante el periodo perioperatorio. Resultados: Se analizaron 5.928 casos. Un total de 542 pacientes (9,1%) recibieron algún tipo de coloides, siendo el hidroxietilalmidón el más utilizado (5,1%). Los pacientes que recibieron coloides tuvieron intervenciones más prolongadas (150 [90-255] vs. 75 [45-120] min), fueron intervenidos de urgencia (13,7 vs. 7,5%) y se clasificaron como de alto riesgo (22 vs. 4,8%) más frecuentemente. Su recuperación inmediata mayoritariamente transcurrió en unidades de críticos (45,1 vs.15,8%). Los pacientes que presentaron una hemorragia menor de 500ml recibieron coloides en un 5,9% frente al 45,9% cuando se superó esta cifra. Los pacientes que recibieron coloides presentaban anemia más frecuentemente: 29,4 vs. 16,3%. La administración de coloides supuso un mayor riesgo de transfusión (OR 15,7). La monitorización avanzada también aumentó la probabilidad de administrar coloides (OR 9,43). Conclusiones: En nuestro medio y en condiciones de práctica clínica habitual, la utilización de los coloides es escasa...(AU)

Introduction: Fluid administration is the cornerstone in hypovolemic patient's reanimation. Clinical guidelines restrict colloid administration favouring crystalloids. Currently, we don’t know exactly which is the daily clinical practice during the perioperative period. The objective of this study is to describe perioperative use of colloids analysing possible reasons aiming to use them. Material and Methods: Prospective, cross-section, national, multicentre observational study. Fluid Day sub-study. We enrolled all patient's older than 18 years old who underwent surgery during the 24h of the 2-days study (February, 2019, 18th and 20th). We registered demographic data, comorbidities, anaesthetic and surgical procedure data, fluids administered, perioperative bleeding and monitoring type used during the perioperative period. Results: A total of 5928 cases were analysed and 542 patients (9.1%) received any type of colloids, being hydroxiethyl-starch the most frequently used (5.1%). Patients receiving colloids suffered more longing surgery (150 [90-255] vs. 75 [45-120] min), were urgently operated (13.7 vs. 7.5%) and were more frequent classified as high risk (22 vs. 4.8%). Their recovery was mostly in critical care units (45.1 vs.15.8%). Patients with bleeding less than 500mL received colloids in a percentage of 5.9 versus 45.9% when this figure was overcome. Patients who received colloids were anaemic more frequently: 29.4 vs. 16.3%. Colloids administration had a higher risk for transfusion (OR 15.7). Advanced monitoring also increased the risk for receiving colloids (OR 9.43). Conclusions: In our environment with routine clinical practice, colloids administration is limited and close linked to perioperative bleeding.(AU)

Perioperative colloids: From theory to practice.

INTRODUCTION: Fluid administration is the cornerstone in hypovolemic patient's reanimation. Clinical guidelines restrict colloid administration favouring crystalloids. Currently, we don't know exactly which is the daily clinical practice during the perioperative period. The objective of this study is to describe perioperative use of colloids analysing possible reasons aiming to use them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, cross-section, national, multicentre observational study. Fluid Day sub-study. We enrolled all patient's older than 18 years old who underwent surgery during the 24 h of the 2-days study (February, 2019, 18th and 20th). We registered demographic data, comorbidities, anaesthetic and surgical procedure data, fluids administered, perioperative bleeding and monitoring type used during the perioperative period. RESULTS: A total of 5928 cases were analysed and 542 patients (9.1%) received any type of colloids, being hydroxiethyl-starch the most frequently used (5.1%). Patients receiving colloids suffered more longing surgery (150 [90-255] vs. 75 [45-120] min), were urgently operated (13.7 vs. 7.5%) and were more frequent classified as high risk (22 vs. 4.8%). Their recovery was mostly in critical care units (45.1 vs.15.8%). Patients with bleeding less than 500 ml received colloids in a percentage of 5.9 versus 45.9% when this figure was overcome. Patients who received colloids were anaemic more frequently: 29.4 vs. 16.3%. Colloids administration had a higher risk for transfusion (OR 15.7). Advanced monitoring also increased the risk for receiving colloids (OR 9.43). CONCLUSIONS: In our environment with routine clinical practice, colloids administration is limited and close linked to perioperative bleeding.

Damage Control Resuscitation in polytrauma patient. / Damage Control Resuscitation en el paciente traumático.

Haemorrhagic shock is one of the main causes of mortality in severe polytrauma patients. To increase the survival rates, a combined strategy of treatment known as Damage Control has been developed. The aims of this article are to analyse the actual concept of Damage Control Resuscitation and its three treatment levels, describe the best transfusion strategy, and approach the acute coagulopathy of the traumatic patient as an entity. The potential changes of this therapeutic strategy over the coming years are also described.