ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to assess the clinical impact and financial costs of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 5 categories of pediatric and adult hematological cancers. NGS prescriptions were prospectively collected from 26 laboratories, with varied technical and reporting practice (all or only significant targets). Impact was defined by the identification of (1) an actionable mutation, (2) a mutation with prognostic and/or theranostic value, and/or (3) a mutation allowing nosological refinement, reported by local investigators. A microcosting study was undertaken in 4 laboratories, identifying the types and volumes of resources required for each procedural step. Individual index prescriptions for 3961 patients were available for impact analysis on the management of myeloid disorders (two thirds) and, mainly mature B, lymphoid disorders (one third). NGS results were considered to impact the management for 73.4% of prescriptions: useful for evaluation of prognostic risk in 34.9% and necessary for treatment adaptation (actionable) in 19.6%, but having no immediate individual therapeutic impact in 18.9%. The average overall cost per sample was 191 for the restricted mature lymphoid amplicon panel. Capture panel costs varied from 369 to 513 . Unit costs varied from 0.5 to 5.7 per kb sequenced, from 3.6 to 11.3 per target gene/hot-spot sequenced and from 4.3 to 73.8 per target gene/hot-spot reported. Comparable costs for the Amplicon panels were 5-8 per kb and 10.5-14.7 per target gene/hot-spot sequenced and reported, demonstrating comparable costs with greater informativity/flexibility for capture strategies. Sustainable funding of precision medicine requires a transparent discussion of its impact on care pathways and its financial aspects.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated how next generation sequencing (NGS) can modify care pathways in an observational impact study in France. METHODS: All patients with lung cancer, colorectal cancer, or melanoma who had NGS analyses of somatic genomic alterations done in 1 of 7 biomolecular platforms certified by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) between 2013 and 2016 were eligible. We compared patients' pathways before and after their NGS results. Endpoints consisted of the turnaround time in obtaining results, the number of patients with at least 1 genomic alteration identified, the number of actionable alterations, the impact of the genomic multidisciplinary tumor board on care pathways, the number of changes in the treatment plan, and the survival outcome up to 1 year after NGS analyses. RESULTS: 1213 patients with a request for NGS analysis were included. NGS was performed for 1155 patients, identified at least 1 genomic alteration for 867 (75%), and provided an actionable alteration for 614 (53%). Turnaround time between analyses and results was on average 8 days (Min: 0; Max: 95) for all cancer types. Before NGS analysis, 33 of 614 patients (5%) were prescribed a targeted therapy compared with 54 of 614 patients (8%) after NGS analysis. Proposition of inclusion in clinical trials with experimental treatments increased from 5% (n = 31 of 614) before to 28% (n = 178 of 614) after NGS analysis. Patients who benefited from a genotype matched treatment after NGS analysis tended to have a better survival outcome at 1 year than patients with nonmatched treatment: 258 days (±107) compared with 234 days (±106), (P = .41). CONCLUSIONS: NGS analyses resulted in a change in patients' care pathways for 20% of patients (n = 232 of 1155).
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Melanoma/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Female , France , Genomics/methods , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Melanoma/therapy , Middle Aged , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Retrospective Studies , Survival , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
Seventy-five percent of patients with beta thalassemia (ß-thalassemia) do not have human leukocyte antigen-matched siblings and until recently had no access to a curative treatment. Gene therapy is a promising treatment that can be proposed to these patients. This study estimates its cost and efficacy. In a monocentric retrospective study and cost-efficacy analysis, this study compared the two-year outcomes and costs of patients with ß-thalassemia treated by gene therapy and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Grade III and grade IV complications, hospitalizations, and length of stay were extracted from the hospital discharge data. Costs were estimated from hospital accounting information and national cost studies. A total of seven patients with ß-thalassemia treated between 2009 and 2016 were included, of whom four received gene therapy. Patients treated by gene therapy were older and had fewer complications and hospital admissions. Infectious complications were three times more frequent for patients treated with HSCT than for gene therapy. Average costs were 608,086 for patients treated by gene therapy and 215,571 for HSCT. The total cost of the vector was 48% of the total cost of gene therapy. Gene therapy as a curative alternative for patients lacking human leukocyte antigen-matched donors was costlier but resulted in fewer complications than HSCT.