ABSTRACT
Patients with depressive disorders are especially prone to suicide risk. Among the clinical predictors of suicidality, those specifically related to depressive disorders have not been accurately detailed. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting longitudinal predictors of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and suicide death within depression, including diagnostic subtypes, symptoms, clinical course, and assessment scales. A systematic search of the literature between 2001 and 2022 identified 4422 references, among which 19 studies providing 45 different predictors of suicidality met the inclusion criteria. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for 22 predictors, three for suicidal ideation, eleven for suicide attempts and eight for suicide death. Heterogeneity and publication bias were inspected through I2 tests and Egger's tests respectively. Meta-analysis results showed that severity of hopelessness predicted suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. History of suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, severe depression, and psychotic symptoms predicted subsequent suicide attempts and suicide death. Time to full remission and sleep disturbances were also found as relevant predictors of future suicide behaviours. This review specifies which predictors of suicidality within the clinical features of depression will help clinicians and policy makers to better prevent suicide risk in patients with depressive disorders. Further longitudinal studies are needed to reliably assess the predictive ability of our results and to analyse other possible clinical predictors to prevent suicidality, especially with regard to suicidal ideation.
ABSTRACT
Impaired executive function (EF) is a key feature of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) that several studies have linked to suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. This is the first longitudinal study to examine the association between impaired EF and suicide risk in adult patients with MDD. Longitudinal prospective study with 3 assessment points: baseline, 6 and 12 months. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was used to assess suicidality. The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) was used to assess EF. The association between EF impairments and suicidality was analyzed using mixed-effects models. Out of 167 eligible outpatients, 104 were included in the study. Of these, 72 were re-evaluated at 6 months and 60 at 12 months, obtaining 225 complete observations of the EF. Impaired decision-making and risk-taking behavior were associated with suicidal ideation. Difficulty in impulse control was related to suicidal ideation and to greater severity of suicidal ideation. Impaired spatial planning and working memory was linked to suicide attempts. Our results add to previous literature that the association between EF impairments and suicidality is maintained over the long term, supporting it as a longitudinal risk factor and a possible neurocognitive marker of suicide in patients with MDD.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Adult , Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Follow-Up Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Prospective Studies , Executive Function , Suicide, Attempted/psychology , Suicidal Ideation , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Depression usually worsens lifestyle habits, but previous evidence also suggests that an unhealthy lifestyle (UL) increases the risk of depression. Many studies have analyzed the association between lifestyle and depression in several nationally representative samples, but none have done so in the Spanish adult population. Our aim was to examine the associations between UL habits and depression in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of cross-sectional data from the latest National Health Survey published in 2018 (N=23,089). Data on depression and 4 lifestyle factors (diet, physical exercise, smoking, and alcohol consumption) were used. These factors were combined into an UL index ranging from 0 (healthiest lifestyle) to 4 (unhealthiest lifestyle). The prevalence of depression at different levels of the UL index, and the association between depression and both the cumulative UL index and the 4 UL factors was analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Sedentarism was the most prevalent UL factor, followed by unhealthy diet, smoking and high-risk alcohol consumption. Having ≥1 UL factors was associated with a higher prevalence of depression compared to having 0 UL factors (2.5% vs. ≥5.2%), regardless of the cumulative number UL factors (1, 2, 3 or 4). Being physically inactive (OR=1.6) and a smoker (OR=1.3) increased the likelihood of depression. Being a high-risk wine drinker (OR=0.26) decreased the likelihood of depression. Dietary intake was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of depression changes depending on several modifiable lifestyle factors. Policy makers should therefore spare no resources in promoting strategies to encourage healthy lifestyles and prevent the acquisition of UL habits.
ABSTRACT
Health care for depression is a major challenge. The aim of this review is to capture the status of the detection, diagno- sis and treatment of depression in the Spanish public health system. The data from the latest National Health Survey (ENSE 2017) have been analyzed and a non-systematic search for publications has been carried out in the PubMed and Scopus databases. We highlight the high specificity and low sensitivity in the detection of cases of major depression by Primary Care (PC) physicians in Spain. The detection of depression is supe- rior in specialized care compared to PC. The new healthcare systems based on the shared approach and the hierarchical model of screening, diagnosis and referral are reviewed and we present improvement proposals based on various programs and models of healthcare for depression.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Primary Health Care , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Humans , Mass Screening , SpainABSTRACT
La atención sanitaria de la depresión constituye unreto de primer nivel. El objetivo de esta revisión es plasmarel estado de la detección, diagnóstico y tratamiento de ladepresión en el sistema de salud público español. Se hananalizado los datos de la última Encuesta Nacional de Salud(ENSE 2017) y se ha realizado una búsqueda no sistemáticade publicaciones en las bases de datos PubMed y Scopus.Destacamos la alta especificidad y la baja sensibilidad en ladetección de casos de depresión mayor por parte de los médicos de Atención Primaria (AP) en España. La detección dela depresión es superior en la Atención Especializada que enAP. Se revisan los nuevos sistemas asistenciales basados en elabordaje compartido y en el modelo jerárquico de cribado,diagnóstico y derivación, y planteamos propuestas de mejoraa partir de diversos programas y modelos de atención sanitaria de la depresión. (AU)
Health care for depression is a major challenge. The aim ofthis review is to capture the status of the detection, diagnosis and treatment of depression in the Spanish public healthsystem. The data from the latest National Health Survey (ENSE2017) have been analyzed and a non-systematic search forpublications has been carried out in the PubMed and Scopusdatabases. We highlight the high specificity and low sensitivityin the detection of cases of major depression by Primary Care(PC) physicians in Spain. The detection of depression is superior in specialized care compared to PC. The new healthcaresystems based on the shared approach and the hierarchicalmodel of screening, diagnosis and referral are reviewed andwe present improvement proposals based on various programsand models of healthcare for depression (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , First Aid , Diagnosis , Spain , TherapeuticsABSTRACT
The aim of this systematic review was to determine the adherence to lifestyle interventions for adults with depression and to estimate the dropout rates in trials examining the impact of these interventions. A bibliographic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane library, and several sources of grey literature. We included randomised controlled trials examining the impact of multiple lifestyle interventions on depressive symptomatology in adults when compared to control or other active treatments. Two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted the relevant data, and assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane tools. A random effects meta-analysis of proportions was used to summarise the proportion of participants who completed the intervention and to determine the proportion of dropouts at post-treatment assessment. Multiple subgroup analyses were also carried out. We identified six trials. The meta-analysis of proportions showed that 53% (95%CI 49% to 58%) of the participants assigned to the intervention group fully adhered to the intervention program. The weighted mean proportion of completed intervention sessions was 66%. The pooled trial dropout rate was 22% (95%CI 20% to 24%). Around half of adults with depression adhere to lifestyle interventions. Future research is needed to develop interventions to support adherence to lifestyle interventions in depressive patients.
