Outcomes with single-agent gilteritinib for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutant AML after contemporary induction therapy.

Gilteritinib is the current standard of care for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML in many countries, however outcomes for patients relapsing after contemporary first-line therapies (intensive chemotherapy with midostaurin, or non-intensive chemotherapy with venetoclax) are uncertain. Moreover, reported data on toxicity and healthcare resource use is limited. Here we describe a large real-world cohort of 152 patients receiving single-agent gilteritinib in 38 UK hospitals. Median age was 61 and 36% had received 2 prior lines of therapy, including a FLT3 inhibitor in 41% and venetoclax in 24%. A median of 4 cycles of gilteritinib were administered, with 56% of patients requiring hospitalisation in the first cycle (median 10 days). Over half of patients required transfusion in each of the first 4 cycles. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 21% and CR with incomplete recovery in a further 9%. Remission rates were lower for patients with FLT3-TKD or adverse karyotype. Day 30 and day 60 mortality were 1% and 10.6% and median overall survival was 9.5 months. On multivariable analysis, increasing age, KMT2A rearrangement and complex karyotype were associated with worse survival while RUNX1 mutations were associated with improved survival. Twenty patients received gilteritinib as first salvage having progressed following first-line therapy with venetoclax, with CR/CRi achieved in 25% and median survival 4.5 months. Real-world results with gilteritinib mirror those seen in the clinical trials but outcomes remain suboptimal, with more effective strategies needed.

Pretransplant MRD detection of fusion transcripts is strongly prognostic in KMT2A-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia.

Pre-transplant detection of KMT2Ar MRD ≥0.001% by quantitative PCR was associated with significantly inferior post-transplant survival (2-year RFS 17% vs 59%; p=0.001) and increased cumulative incidence of relapse (2-year CIR 75% vs 25%, p=0.0004).

Measurable residual disease monitoring in AML: Prospects for therapeutic decision-making and new drug development.

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is strongly associated with risk of relapse and long-term survival outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Apart from its clear prognostic impact, MRD information is also increasingly used to guide therapeutic decision-making, including selection of appropriate patients for stem cell transplant, use of post-transplant maintenance, and candidacy for non-transplant maintenance therapies or MRD-directed clinical trials. While much progress has been made in accurately assessing MRD and understanding its clinical importance, many questions remain about how to optimize MRD testing and guide treatment decisions for individual patients. In this review, we discuss the common methods to assess MRD in AML and the prognostic impact of MRD across common clinical scenarios. We also review emerging and investigational strategies to target MRD and discuss some of the important unanswered questions and challenges in the field.

Molecular, clinical, and therapeutic determinants of outcome in NPM1-mutated AML.

ABSTRACT: Although NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) carries a generally favorable prognosis, many patients still relapse and die. Previous studies identified several molecular and clinical features associated with poor outcomes; however, only FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutation and adverse karyotype are currently used for risk stratification because of inconsistent results and uncertainty about how other factors should influence treatment, particularly given the strong prognostic effect of postinduction measurable residual disease (MRD). Here, we analyzed a large group of patients with NPM1 mutations (NPM1mut) AML enrolled in prospective trials (National Cancer Research Institute [NCRI] AML17 and AML19, n = 1357) to delineate the impact of baseline molecular and clinical features, postinduction MRD status, and treatment intensity on the outcome. FLT3-ITD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.63), DNMT3A (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.32-2.05), WT1 (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.27-2.38), and non-ABD NPM1mut (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.22-2.21) were independently associated with poorer overall survival (OS). These factors were also strongly associated with MRD positivity. For patients who achieved MRD negativity, these mutations (except FLT3-ITD) were associated with an increased cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and poorer OS. However, apart from the few patients with adverse cytogenetics, we could not identify any group of MRD-negative patients with a CIR >40% or with benefit from allograft in first remission. Intensified chemotherapy with the FLAG-Ida (fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and idarubicin) regimen was associated with improved outcomes in all subgroups, with greater benefits observed in the high-risk molecular subgroups.

Clinical networking results in continuous improvement of the outcome of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia.

ABSTRACT: The introduction of all-trans retinoic acid combined with anthracyclines has significantly improved the outcomes for patients diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), and this strategy remains the standard of care in countries in which arsenic trioxide is not affordable. However, data from national registries and real-world databases indicate that low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) still face disappointing results, mainly because of high induction mortality and suboptimal management of complications. The American Society of Hematology established the International Consortium on Acute Leukemias (ICAL) to address this challenge through international clinical networking. Here, we present the findings from the International Consortium on Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia study involving 806 patients with APL recruited from 2005 to 2020 in Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay. The induction mortality rate has notably decreased to 14.6% compared with the pre-ICAL rate of 32%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed as factors associated with induction death: age of ≥40 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 3, high-risk status based on the Programa Español de Tratamiento en Hematologia/Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto classification, albumin level of ≤3.5 g/dL, bcr3 PML/RARA isoform, the interval between presenting symptoms to diagnosis exceeding 48 hours, and the occurrence of central nervous system and pulmonary bleeding. With a median follow-up of 53 months, the estimated 4-year overall survival rate is 81%, the 4-year disease-free survival rate is 80%, and the 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse rate is 15%. These results parallel those observed in studies conducted in high-income countries, highlighting the long-term effectiveness of developing clinical networks to improve clinical care and infrastructure in LMIC.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Pre-emptive Therapy at Molecular Measurable Residual Disease Failure in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Molecular measurable residual disease (MRD, eg, by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, RT-qPCR), is an integral part of response assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with established prognostic and evolving therapeutic significance. MRD failure can occur through several pathways (namely MRD persistence at the end of treatment at a high level, MRD progression from a low level or MRD re-emergence during follow up; the latter two constitute MRD relapse as defined by the European Leukemia Net) and is clinically actionable, with survival benefit reported in AML subgroups. Selection of pre-emptive therapy at MRD failure relies upon an integrated clinico-molecular assessment and is subset-specific. In acute promyelocytic leukemia, arsenic trioxide-based regimen for MRD failure following frontline treatment with all-trans-retinoic acid plus chemotherapy represents standard of care, while hypomethylating agents (eg, azacitidine), salvage chemotherapy (eg, FLAG-IDA) and venetoclax-based regimens are effective in NPM1-mutated AML. Specific inhibitors of FLT3 have emerging use in FLT3-mutated AML and are associated with minimal toxicity. Furthermore, immunotherapeutic approaches such as donor lymphocyte infusions and interferon-⍺ are efficacious options in the post-allogeneic-HSCT settings. Enrollment into clinical trials with genomic-guided assignment of pre-emptive therapy at MRD failure should be prioritized. Finally, with the emergence of novel agents (eg, menin inhibitors) and approaches (eg, adoptive cellular and immunological therapy), an exciting future lies ahead where a broad array of highly active pre-emptive therapeutic options will likely be clinically applicable to a wide range of AML subsets.

Targeting Molecular Measurable Residual Disease and Low-Blast Relapse in AML With Venetoclax and Low-Dose Cytarabine: A Prospective Phase II Study (VALDAC).

PURPOSE: A prospective phase II study examined the safety and efficacy of venetoclax combined with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in AML at first measurable residual disease (MRD) or oligoblastic relapse. METHODS: Patients with either MRD (≥1 log10 rise) or oligoblastic relapse (blasts 5%-15%) received venetoclax 600 mg once daily D1-28 plus LDAC once daily D1-10 in 28-day cycles. The primary objective was MRD response in the MRD relapse cohort or complete remission (CR/CRh/CRi) in the oligoblastic relapse cohort. RESULTS: Forty-eight adults with either MRD (n = 26) or oligoblastic (n = 22) relapse were enrolled. Median age was 67 years (range, 18-80) and 94% had received previous intensive chemotherapy. Patients received a median of four cycles of therapy; 17% completed ≥12 cycles. Patients with oligoblastic relapse had more grade ≥3 anemia (32% v 4%; P = .02) and infections (36% v 8%; P = .03), whereas grade 4 neutropenia (32 v 23%) or thrombocytopenia (27 v 15%) were comparable with the MRD relapse cohort. Markers of molecular MRD relapse included mutant NPM1 (77%), CBFB::MYH11 (4%), RUNX1::RUNX1T1 (4%), or KMT2A::MLLT3 (4%). Three patients with a log10 rise in IDH1/2 (12%) were included. By cycle 2 in the MRD relapse cohort, a log10 reduction in MRD was observed in 69%; 46% achieved MRD negative remission. In the oligoblastic relapse cohort, 73% achieved CR/CRh/CRi. Overall, 21 (44%) underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either cohort. Estimated 2-year OS rate was 67% (95% CI, 50 to 89) in the MRD and 53% (95% CI, 34 to 84) in the oligoblastic relapse cohorts. CONCLUSION: For AML in first remission and either MRD or oligoblastic relapse, venetoclax plus LDAC is well tolerated and highly effective.

Postinduction molecular MRD identifies patients with NPM1 AML who benefit from allogeneic transplant in first remission.

ABSTRACT: Selection of patients with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for allogeneic transplant in first complete remission (CR1-allo) remains controversial because of a lack of robust data. Consequently, some centers consider baseline FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) an indication for transplant, and others rely on measurable residual disease (MRD) status. Using prospective data from the United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute AML17 and AML19 studies, we examined the impact of CR1-allo according to peripheral blood NPM1 MRD status measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction after 2 courses of induction chemotherapy. Of 737 patients achieving remission, MRD was positive in 19%. CR1-allo was performed in 46% of MRD+ and 17% of MRD- patients. We observed significant heterogeneity of overall survival (OS) benefit from CR1-allo according to MRD status, with substantial OS advantage for MRD+ patients (3-year OS with CR1-allo vs without: 61% vs 24%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.64; P < .001) but no benefit for MRD- patients (3-year OS with CR1-allo vs without: 79% vs 82%; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.50-1.33; P = .4). Restricting analysis to patients with coexisting FLT3-ITD, again CR1-allo only improved OS for MRD+ patients (3-year OS, 45% vs 18%; compared with 83% vs 76% if MRD-); no interaction with FLT3 allelic ratio was observed. Postinduction molecular MRD reliably identifies those patients who benefit from allogeneic transplant in first remission. The AML17 and AML19 trials were registered at www.isrctn.com as #ISRCTN55675535 and #ISRCTN78449203, respectively.

Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, and Idarubicin With Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin Improves Event-Free Survival in Younger Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML and Overall Survival in Patients With NPM1 and FLT3 Mutations.

PURPOSE: To determine the optimal induction chemotherapy regimen for younger adults with newly diagnosed AML without known adverse risk cytogenetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to intensified (fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and idarubicin [FLAG-Ida]) or standard (daunorubicin and Ara-C [DA]) induction chemotherapy, with one or two doses of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: There was no difference in remission rate after two courses between FLAG-Ida + GO and DA + GO (complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery 93% v 91%) or in day 60 mortality (4.3% v 4.6%). There was no difference in OS (66% v 63%; P = .41); however, the risk of relapse was lower with FLAG-Ida + GO (24% v 41%; P < .001) and 3-year event-free survival was higher (57% v 45%; P < .001). In patients with an NPM1 mutation (30%), 3-year OS was significantly higher with FLAG-Ida + GO (82% v 64%; P = .005). NPM1 measurable residual disease (MRD) clearance was also greater, with 88% versus 77% becoming MRD-negative in peripheral blood after cycle 2 (P = .02). Three-year OS was also higher in patients with a FLT3 mutation (64% v 54%; P = .047). Fewer transplants were performed in patients receiving FLAG-Ida + GO (238 v 278; P = .02). There was no difference in outcome according to the number of GO doses, although NPM1 MRD clearance was higher with two doses in the DA arm. Patients with core binding factor AML treated with DA and one dose of GO had a 3-year OS of 96% with no survival benefit from FLAG-Ida + GO. CONCLUSION: Overall, FLAG-Ida + GO significantly reduced relapse without improving OS. However, exploratory analyses show that patients with NPM1 and FLT3 mutations had substantial improvements in OS. By contrast, in patients with core binding factor AML, outcomes were excellent with DA + GO with no FLAG-Ida benefit.

Molecular MRD is strongly prognostic in patients with NPM1-mutated AML receiving venetoclax-based nonintensive therapy.

ABSTRACT: Assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction is strongly prognostic in patients with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with intensive chemotherapy; however, there are no data regarding its utility in venetoclax-based nonintensive therapy, despite high efficacy in this genotype. We analyzed the prognostic impact of NPM1 MRD in an international real-world cohort of 76 previously untreated patients with NPM1-mutated AML who achieved complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematological recovery following treatment with venetoclax and hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). A total of 44 patients (58%) achieved bone marrow (BM) MRD negativity, and a further 14 (18%) achieved a reduction of ≥4 log10 from baseline as their best response, with no difference between HMAs and LDAC. The cumulative rates of BM MRD negativity by the end of cycles 2, 4, and 6 were 25%, 47%, and 50%, respectively. Patients achieving BM MRD negativity by the end of cycle 4 had 2-year overall of 84% compared with 46% if MRD was positive. On multivariable analyses, MRD negativity was the strongest prognostic factor. A total of 22 patients electively stopped therapy in BM MRD-negative remission after a median of 8 cycles, with 2-year treatment-free remission of 88%. In patients with NPM1-mutated AML attaining remission with venetoclax combination therapies, NPM1 MRD provides valuable prognostic information.

Venetoclax-based low intensity therapy in molecular failure of NPM1-mutated AML.

ABSTRACT: Molecular failure in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) inevitably progresses to frank relapse if untreated. Recently published small case series show that venetoclax combined with low-dose cytarabine or azacitidine can reduce or eliminate measurable residual disease (MRD). Here, we report on an international multicenter cohort of 79 patients treated for molecular failure with venetoclax combinations and report an overall molecular response (≥1-log reduction in MRD) in 66 patients (84%) and MRD negativity in 56 (71%). Eighteen of 79 patients (23%) required hospitalization, and no deaths were reported during treatment. Forty-one patients were bridged to allogeneic transplant with no further therapy, and 25 of 41 were MRD negative assessed by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction before transplant. Overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort at 2 years was 67%, event-free survival (EFS) was 45%, and in responding patients, there was no difference in survival in those who received a transplant using time-dependent analysis. Presence of FLT3-ITD mutation was associated with a lower response rate (64 vs 91%; P < .01), worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-5.86; P = .036), and EFS (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.06-3.28; P = .03). Eighteen of 35 patients who did not undergo transplant became MRD negative and stopped treatment after a median of 10 months, with 2-year molecular relapse free survival of 62% from the end of treatment. Venetoclax-based low intensive chemotherapy is a potentially effective treatment for molecular relapse in NPM1-mutated AML, either as a bridge to transplant or as definitive therapy.

Optimal Post-Remission Consolidation Therapy in Patients with AML.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances, 40-85% of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) achieve complete remission after intensive chemotherapy. However, without optimal treatment after remission, the risk of relapse remains high. SUMMARY: A variable number of consolidation cycles consisting of intermediate doses of cytarabine are the most commonly used regimens in low-intermediate-risk AML, while patients at higher risk of relapse should consolidate response by proceeding to HSCT. Different post-consolidation (maintenance therapies) have demonstrated their benefit in prolonging relapse-free survival, and others are still under investigation. Careful consideration should be given to which patients benefit most from each of these interventions, considering that the risk of relapse is dynamic. KEY MESSAGES: Patients consolidated with chemotherapy should receive either 2 courses of HDAC or no more than 3-4 cycles of IDAC with dose reduction in patients over 60 years. Patients with mutated FLT3 AML benefit from post-consolidation maintenance with FLT3 inhibitors, and selected patients not fit for adequate consolidation may benefit from CC-468 maintenance. Patients at higher risk of relapse should proceed to allogeneic SCT as soon as possible, opting for a more intensive conditioning in patients younger than 55 years. However, autologous HSCT may still have role in favourable-risk MRD-negative AML. Multiple treatment options targeting MRD are emerging, either as definitive treatment or as a bridge to allogeneic transplantation, and are likely to become increasingly relevant.

Criteria for Diagnosis and Molecular Monitoring of NPM1-Mutated AML.

NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents the largest molecular subgroup of adult AML. NPM1-mutated AML is recognizable by molecular techniques and immunohistochemistry, which, when combined, can solve difficult diagnostic problems (including identification of myeloid sarcoma and NPM1 mutations outside exon 12). According to updated 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines, determining the mutational status of NPM1 (and FLT3) is a mandatory step for the genetic-based risk stratification of AML. Monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) by qRT-PCR, combined with ELN risk stratification, can guide therapeutic decisions at the post-remission stage. Here, we review the criteria for appropriate diagnosis and molecular monitoring of NPM1-mutated AML. SIGNIFICANCE: NPM1-mutated AML represents a distinct entity in the 2022 International Consensus Classification and 5th edition of World Health Organization classifications of myeloid neoplasms. The correct diagnosis of NPM1-mutated AML and its distinction from other AML entities is extremely important because it has clinical implications for the management of AML patients, such as genetic-based risk stratification according to 2022 ELN. Monitoring of MRD by qRT-PCR, combined with ELN risk stratification, can guide therapeutic decisions at the post-remission stage, e.g., whether or not to perform allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Measurable residual disease monitoring in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with lower-intensity therapy: Roadmap from an ELN-DAVID expert panel.

With the availability of effective targeted agents, significant changes have occurred in the management of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) over the past several years, particularly for those considered unfit for intensive chemotherapy. While testing for measurable residual disease (MRD) is now routinely performed in patients treated with intensive chemotherapy to refine prognosis and, possibly, inform treatment decision-making, its value in the context of lower-intensity regimens is unclear. As such regimens have gained in popularity and can be associated with higher response rates, the need to better define the role of MRD assessment and the appropriate time points and assays used for this purpose has increased. This report outlines a roadmap for MRD testing in patients with AML treated with lower-intensity regimens. Experts from the European LeukemiaNet (ELN)-DAVID AML MRD working group reviewed all available data to propose a framework for MRD testing in future trials and clinical practice. A Delphi poll served to optimize consensus. Establishment of uniform standards for MRD assessments in lower-intensity regimens used in treating patients with AML is clinically relevant and important for optimizing testing and, ultimately, improving treatment outcomes of these patients.

Standardising acute myeloid leukaemia classification systems: a perspective from a panel of international experts.

The existence of two acute myeloid leukaemia classification systems-one put forth by WHO and one by the International Consensus Classification in 2022-is concerning. Although both systems appropriately move towards genomic disease definitions and reduced emphasis on blast enumeration, there are consequential disagreements between the two systems on what constitutes a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia. This fundamental problem threatens the ability of heath-care providers to diagnose acute myeloid leukaemia, communicate with patients and other health-care providers, and deliver appropriate and consistent management strategies for patients with the condition. Clinical trial eligibility, standardised response assessments, and eventual drug development and regulatory pathways might also be negatively affected by the discrepancies. In this Viewpoint, we review the merits and limitations of both classification systems and illustrate how the coexistence, as well as application of both systems is an undue challenge to patients, clinicians, hematopathologists, sponsors of research, and regulators. Lastly, we emphasise the urgency and propose a roadmap, by which the two divergent classification systems can be harmonised.

FLT3 inhibitors as MRD-guided salvage treatment for molecular failure in FLT3 mutated AML.

Patients with FLT3-mutated AML have a high relapse rate and suboptimal outcomes. Many have co-mutations suitable for measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring by RT-qPCR and those destined to relapse can be identified by high or rising levels of MRD, called molecular failure.  This provides a window for pre-emptive intervention, but there is little evidence to guide treatment. The use of FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) appears attractive but their use has not yet been evaluated.  We identified 56 patients treated with FLT3i at molecular failure.  The FLT3 mutation was an ITD in 52, TKD in 7 and both in 3. Over half of patients had previously received midostaurin. Molecular failure occurred at a median 9.2 months from diagnosis and was treated with gilteritinib (n = 38), quizartinib (n = 7) or sorafenib (n = 11). 60% achieved a molecular response, with 45% reaching MRD negativity. Haematological toxicity was low, and 22 patients were bridged directly to allogeneic transplant with another 6 to donor lymphocyte infusion. 2-year overall survival was 80% (95%CI 69-93) and molecular event-free survival 56% (95%CI 44-72). High-sensitivity next-generation sequencing for FLT3-ITD at molecular failure identified patients more likely to benefit. FLT3i monotherapy for molecular failure is a promising strategy which merits evaluation in prospective studies.