Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
J Appl Gerontol ; : 7334648241246472, 2024 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652665

ABSTRACT

Home care (HC) aides experience numerous safety hazards in clients' homes; many hazards also put clients at risk. We hypothesized that safety coaching led by nurse managers (NMs) during their initial HC needs assessment could prompt clients to improve safety conditions in their homes. Following a 2-arm proof-of-concept intervention study design, intervention NMs used motivational interviewing (MI), facilitated by a safety handbook and video, to coach clients on home safety improvements. Control arm NMs performed intake assessments with no changes to usual practices. Intervention effectiveness was assessed by NMs and aides. Three HC agencies and two elder services contributed 35 intervention and 23 control homes. NMs coached 97% of clients and reported that 94% were engaged; 63% implemented improvements. NMs' and aides' assessments were consistent; homes with clients reported by NMs as resistant to safety changes had higher aides' hazard scores. Client coaching can be effective for improving HC safety.

2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38541359

ABSTRACT

Assuring home care (HC) workers' safety is challenging because the work environment is a private home. This paper presents the process evaluation for a proof-of-concept safety intervention study to assess whether nurse-led safety coaching, using motivational interviewing and a safety handbook, could enable HC clients to improve safety in their homes. The process evaluation objectives were to (i) document the intervention's implementation progress and (ii) assess the intervention's dose delivery, dose reception, and fidelity. Five agencies employing liaisons (n = 5) and nurse managers (NMs, n = 8) implemented this study's intervention and control arms. NMs assigned to the intervention arm (n = 6) coached 34 clients. Process evaluation metrics were assessed with mixed-methods data from (i) surveys completed by NMs during the intervention, (ii) postintervention audio-recorded and transcribed interviews (n = 6) with NMs and liaisons, and (iii) study progress tracking tools. The delivered dose efficiency was 85%, measured by the distribution of safety handbook copies to clients. About 94% of clients (n = 32) were considered "engaged" or "maybe engaged" during the safety coaching. Most coached clients (n = 30) were reachable for follow-up by NMs to assess intervention progress. Despite challenges, the intervention was implemented with good fidelity. Safety coaching can be applied in many HC contexts in larger populations.


Subject(s)
Home Care Services , Mentoring , Humans , Nurse's Role
3.
J Appl Gerontol ; 42(4): 571-580, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36565062

ABSTRACT

Retention of the home care (HC) aide workforce is essential to meet the needs of our aging population. Some studies suggest that improving HC safety could increase job retention. This study objective was to explore qualitatively the connection between aide and client safety and factors impacting this care relationship. Data consisted of audio-recorded, verbatim responses to open-ended questions of two focus groups with aides (n = 10), two in-person interviews with HC agency managers, and 37 phone interviews with those working in (aides, n = 16; managers, n = 12) and receiving (clients, n = 9) HC. Clients reported home layout and accessibility as safety concerns. Aides and managers reported that client family members can make the care job more challenging. The aide-client connection was affected by communication style, family and HC agency support, allotted care time, and job task boundaries. Interventions that address the safety of both clients and aides can influence HC job satisfaction and retention.


Subject(s)
Home Care Services , Home Health Aides , Humans , Aged , Focus Groups , Aging
4.
Am J Ind Med ; 63(4): 368-378, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31833084

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Home care (HC) aide is among the fastest-growing jobs. Aides often work in long-term care relationships with elders or people with disabilities in clients' homes, assisting with daily activities. The purpose of this mixed-methods paper is to elucidate aides' experiences around the boundary-challenging behaviors of clients asking for services beyond aides' job duties and to identify possible interventions. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of HC aides in Massachusetts (n = 1249) provided quantitative data. Post-survey qualitative data were collected from nine HC aide focus groups (n = 70) and seven in-depth interviews with HC industry and labor representatives. RESULTS: Quantitatively, aides who reported often being asked to do tasks outside their job duties were more likely to report abuse (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.93; 95%CI: 1.47-2.52 for verbal, PR = 1.81; 95%CI: 1.13-2.91 for physical/sexual) and pain/injury with lost work time or medical care (PR = 1.58; 95%CI: 1.11-2.25). They were also less likely to want to remain in their job (PR = 0.94; 95%CI: 0.89-1.00) or recommend it to others (PR = 0.94; 95%CI: 0.90-0.98). Qualitative data showed that clients' requests for tasks beyond job duties were frequent and can lead to injuries, abuse, and psychosocial stress. Yet, requests often reflected genuine need. Helping clients stay at home, compassion, and feeling appreciated contributed to job satisfaction; therefore, aides can feel conflicted about refusing requests. CONCLUSION: Client task requests outside HC services are a complex problem. Employer support, training, care plans, and feeling part of a care team can help aides navigate professional boundaries while delivering high quality care.


Subject(s)
Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data , Home Health Aides/psychology , Job Satisfaction , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Workplace/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Massachusetts , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Professional-Patient Relations , Qualitative Research , Research Design
5.
Occup Environ Med ; 76(7): 448-454, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31186370

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Violence from care recipients and family members, including both verbal and physical abuse, is a serious occupational hazard for healthcare and social assistance workers. Most workplace violence studies in this sector focus on hospitals and other institutional settings. This study examined verbal abuse in a large home care (HC) aide population and evaluated risk factors. METHODS: We used questionnaire survey data collected as part of a larger mixed methods study of a range of working conditions among HC aides. This paper focuses on survey responses of HC aides (n=954) who reported on verbal abuse from non-family clients and their family members. Risk factors were identified in univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-two per cent (n=206) of aides reported at least one incident of verbal abuse in the 12 months before the survey. Three factors were found to be important in multivariable models: clients with dementia (relative risk (RR) 1.38, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.78), homes with too little space for the aide to work (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.97) and predictable work hours (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.94); two additional factors were associated with verbal abuse, although not as strongly: having clients with limited mobility (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.93) and an unclear plan for care delivery (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.69). Aides reporting verbal abuse were 11 times as likely to also report physical abuse (RR 11.53; 95% CI 6.84 to 19.45). CONCLUSIONS: Verbal abuse is common among HC aides. These findings suggest specific changes in work organisation and training that may help reduce verbal abuse.


Subject(s)
Home Health Aides/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Verbal Behavior , Workplace Violence/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Dementia , Female , Humans , Male , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Mobility Limitation , Physical Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workplace/statistics & numerical data
6.
Am J Infect Control ; 45(4): 377-383, 2017 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28063731

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Home care (HC) aides constitute an essential, rapidly growing workforce. Technology advances are enabling complex medical care at home, including procedures requiring the percutaneous use of sharp medical devices, also known as sharps. Objectives were to quantify risks of sharps injuries (SI) in a large HC aide population, compare risks between major occupational groups, and evaluate SI risk factors. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was administered to aides hired by HC agencies and directly by clients. One thousand one hundred seventy-eight aides completed questions about SI and potential risk factors occurring in the 12 months before the survey. SI rates were calculated and Poisson regression models identified risk factors. RESULTS: Aides had a 2% annual risk of experiencing at least 1 SI (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.6). Client-hired aides, men, and immigrants had a higher risk than their counterparts. Risk factors among all HC aides included helping a client use a sharp device (rate ratio [RR], 5.62; 95% CI, 2.75-11.50), observing used sharps lying around the home (RR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.27-5.67), and caring for physically aggressive clients (RR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.36-5.85). CONCLUSIONS: HC aides experience serious risks of SI. Preventive interventions are needed, including safety training for clients and their families, as well as aides.


Subject(s)
Home Health Aides , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Occup Environ Med ; 73(4): 237-45, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26209318

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In countries with ageing populations, home care (HC) aides are among the fastest growing jobs. There are few quantitative studies of HC occupational safety and health (OSH) conditions. The objectives of this study were to: (1) assess quantitatively the OSH hazards and benefits for a wide range of HC working conditions, and (2) compare OSH experiences of HC aides who are employed via different medical and social services systems in Massachusetts, USA. METHODS: HC aides were recruited for a survey via agencies that employ aides and schedule their visits with clients, and through a labour union of aides employed directly by clients or their families. The questionnaire included detailed questions about the most recent HC visits, as well as about individual aides' OSH experiences. RESULTS: The study population included 1249 HC aides (634 agency-employed, 615 client-employed) contributing information on 3484 HC visits. Hazards occurring most frequently related to musculoskeletal strain, exposure to potentially infectious agents and cleaning chemicals for infection prevention and experience of violence. Client-hired and agency-hired aides had similar OSH experiences with a few exceptions, including use of sharps and experience of verbal violence. CONCLUSIONS: The OSH experience of HC aides is similar to that of aides in institutional healthcare settings. Despite OSH challenges, HC aides enjoy caring for others and the benefits of HC work should be enhanced. Quantification of HC hazards and benefits is useful to prioritise resources for the development of preventive interventions and to provide an evidence base for policy-setting.


Subject(s)
Employment , Home Care Services , Home Health Aides , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Health , Adult , Disinfectants/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Infections/etiology , Male , Massachusetts , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Needles , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupations , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workplace Violence
8.
New Solut ; 24(4): 535-54, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25816169

ABSTRACT

The Safe Home Care Project investigated both qualitatively and quantitatively a range of occupational safety and health hazards, as well as injury and illness prevention practices, among home care aides in Massachusetts. This article reports on a hazard identified by aides during the study's initial focus groups: smoking by home care clients on long-term oxygen therapy. Following the qualitative phase we conducted a cross-sectional survey among 1,249 aides and found that medical oxygen was present in 9 percent of aide visits (314 of aides' 3,484 recent client visits) and that 25 percent of clients on oxygen therapy were described as smokers. Based on our findings, the Board of Health in a local town conducted a pilot study to address fire hazards related to medical oxygen. Medical oxygen combined with smoking or other sources of ignition is a serious fire and explosion hazard that threatens not only workers who visit homes but also communities.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Fires/prevention & control , Home Health Aides/organization & administration , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/adverse effects , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/nursing , Safety Management/organization & administration , Smoking Prevention , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Education/organization & administration , Humans , Massachusetts , Occupational Health , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects , Smoking/adverse effects
10.
Am J Public Health ; 99 Suppl 3: S710-7, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19890177

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We quantified risks of sharp medical device (sharps) injuries and other blood and body fluid exposures among home health care nurses and aides, identified risk factors, assessed the use of sharps with safety features, and evaluated underreporting in workplace-based surveillance. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire survey and workplace-based surveillance, collaborating with 9 home health care agencies and 2 labor unions from 2006 to 2007. RESULTS: Approximately 35% of nurses and 6.4% of aides had experienced at least 1 sharps injury during their home health care career; corresponding figures for other blood and body fluid exposures were 15.1% and 6.7%, respectively. Annual sharps injuries incidence rates were 5.1 per 100 full-time equivalent (FTE) nurses and 1.0 per 100 FTE aides. Medical procedures contributing to sharps injuries were injecting medications, administering fingersticks and heelsticks, and drawing blood. Other contributing factors were sharps disposal, contact with waste, and patient handling. Sharps with safety features frequently were not used. Underreporting of sharps injuries to the workplace-based surveillance system was estimated to be about 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Sharps injuries and other blood and body fluid exposures are serious hazards for home health care nurses and aides. Improvements in hazard intervention are needed.


Subject(s)
Body Fluids , Community Health Nursing , Home Health Aides , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Blood-Borne Pathogens , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 3(4): 182-93; quiz D45, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16531291

ABSTRACT

An integrated pollution prevention (P(2)) and occupational safety and health (OSH) worksite intervention and alternatives assessment strategy was developed in hospitals. It was called the Pollution Prevention-Occupational Safety and Health (P(2)OSH) assessment for the "Sustainable Hospitals Project." Methods included (a) developing a participatory intervention model for introducing more environmentally sound, healthy, and safe materials and work practices for specific hospital procedures; (b) developing an integrated P(2)OSH survey to evaluate environmental and occupational impacts of the intervention; and (c) conducting and evaluating interventions by applying the P(2)OSH assessment pre- and post-intervention. Eleven interventions were performed in six hospitals: an aliphatic fixative replaced xylene in three histology laboratories; a mercury reduction plan was implemented in three clinical laboratories; digital imaging replaced wet chemical film processing in three radiology departments; a less toxic aldehyde replaced formaldehyde in one hospital histopathology laboratory; and conventional mopping was replaced by microfiber mopping in one hospital. Occupational and environmental health and safety impacts were observed for all interventions. The alternatives generally were beneficial, although each had limitations that resulted in process and task changes with potentially negative P(2) and/or OSH impacts. When these were identified in the pilot phase they could be addressed before full-scale implementation. The P(2)OSH method shifts the focus of occupational and environmental hygiene from hazard control to substitution. Because few ideal alternatives exist, the emphasis is on a continuous process to identify, implement, and evaluate alternatives, rather than on a particular alternative. Occupational and environmental health and safety professionals have an important role as agents in hospital organizational change and in the search for healthier and safer alternatives. Through these activities they can become involved in the design/redesign of products, materials, and processes, thus expanding their traditional role.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control , Hospitals , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Health , Data Collection , Facility Design and Construction , Humans , Laboratories , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Radiology Department, Hospital , Safety
12.
AORN J ; 79(3): 579; author reply 582-4; discussion 584-5, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15074517
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...