A Retrospective Evaluation of Adjunctive Phenobarbital vs. Benzodiazepine Alone for the Treatment of Moderate Alcohol Withdrawal in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Phenobarbital has been used in the emergency department (ED) as both a primary and adjunctive medication for alcohol withdrawal, but previous studies evaluating its impact on patient outcomes are limited by heterogenous symptom severity. OBJECTIVES: We compared the clinical outcomes of ED patients with moderate alcohol withdrawal who received phenobarbital, with or without benzodiazepines, with patients who received benzodiazepine treatment alone. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single academic medical center utilizing chart review of ED patients with moderate alcohol withdrawal between 2015 and 2020. Patient encounters were classified into two treatment categories based on medication treatment: phenobarbital alone or in combination with benzodiazepines vs. benzodiazepines alone. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact was used to analyze categorical variables and the Student's t-test for continuous data. RESULTS: Among the 287 encounters that met inclusion criteria, 100 received phenobarbital, compared with 187 that received benzodiazepines alone. Patients who received phenobarbital were provided significantly more lorazepam equivalents. There was a significant difference in the percentage of patient encounters that required admission to the hospital in the phenobarbital cohort compared with the benzodiazepine cohort (75% vs. 43.3%, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in admission level of care to the floor (51.2% vs. 52.0%), stepdown (33.8% vs. 28%), or intensive care unit (15% vs. 20%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received phenobarbital for moderate alcohol withdrawal were more likely to be admitted to the hospital, but there was no difference in admission level of care when compared with patients who received benzodiazepines alone. Patients who received phenobarbital were provided greater lorazepam equivalents in the ED.

Implementation of Electronic Health Record Integration and Clinical Decision Support to Improve Emergency Department Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use.

STUDY OBJECTIVE(S): To evaluate the implementation of 3 electronic health record (EHR)-based interventions to increase prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) use in the emergency department (ED): EHR-PDMP integration, addition of a PDMP risk score, and addition of EHR-based clinical decision support alert to review the PDMP when prescribing an opioid. METHODS: Three intervention stages were implemented using a prospective stepped-wedge design at 5 university-affiliated EDs split into 3 practice groups. The PDMP use and prescribing rates during the 3 stages were compared with baseline before EHR integration and a sustainability stage where the clinical decision support alert was removed, but EHR integration and risk score remained. Generalized linear mixed model with logit link function and a random intercept for clinicians was analyzed. RESULTS: The ED provider PDMP review before opioid prescribing was low in all stages. The highest review rate occurred during interruptive clinical decision support alerts, 23.8% (interquartile range 10.6 to 37.5). Overall, opioid prescribing declined, and PDMP review was not associated with a decrease in opioid prescribing. PDMP review was associated with a reduction in the probability of prescribing an opioid as the number of prior opioid prescriptions increased (odds ratio: 0.92 [95% confidence interval: 0.91 to 0.94] for every additional prescription). CONCLUSION: The EHR-PDMP integration did not increase PDMP use in the ED, but a PDMP risk score and a clinical decision support alert were associated with modest increases in the probability of PDMP review. When the PDMP is reviewed, ED clinicians are less likely to prescribe opioids to patients with a high number of prior opioid prescriptions.

Fomepizole Therapy for Acetaminophen-Induced Liver Failure in an Infant.

Acetaminophen overdose is common in the pediatric population. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is effective at preventing liver injury in most patients when started shortly after the overdose. Delays to therapy increase risk of hepatotoxicity and liver failure that may necessitate organ transplant. Animal studies have demonstrated fomepizole may provide added benefit in acetaminophen overdose because of its ability to block the metabolic pathway that produces the toxic acetaminophen metabolite and downstream inhibition of oxidative stress pathways that lead to cell death. Several adult case reports describe use of fomepizole in patients at higher risk for poor outcomes despite NAC. We describe a case of a 7-month-old female who presented in acute liver failure with persistently elevated acetaminophen concentration secondary to repeated supratherapeutic doses of acetaminophen to manage fever. Fomepizole and NAC antidotes were used in the management of the patient. She fully recovered despite demonstrating multiple markers of poor outcome on initial presentation. Although randomized trials are lacking, this case suggests that fomepizole may safely provide additional benefit in pediatric patients at risk for severe acetaminophen toxicity.

Management of Acetaminophen Poisoning in the US and Canada: A Consensus Statement.

Importance: The US and Canada currently have no formal published nationwide guidelines for specialists in poison information or emergency departments for the management of acetaminophen poisoning, resulting in significant variability in management. Objective: To develop consensus guidelines for the management of acetaminophen poisoning in the US and Canada. Evidence Review: Four clinical toxicology societies (America's Poison Centers, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, American College of Medical Toxicology, and Canadian Association of Poison Control Centers) selected participants (n = 21). Led by a nonvoting chairperson using a modified Delphi method, the panel created a decision framework and determined the appropriate clinical management of a patient with acetaminophen poisoning. Unique to this effort was the collection of guidelines from most poison centers in addition to systematic collection and review of the medical literature. Comments from review by external organizations were incorporated before the guideline was finalized. The project began in March 2021 and ended in March 2023. Findings: The search retrieved 84 guidelines and 278 publications. The panel developed guidelines for emergency department management of single or repeated ingestion of acetaminophen. In addition, the panel addressed extended-release formulation, high-risk ingestion, coingestion of anticholinergics or opioids, age younger than 6 years, pregnancy, weight greater than 100 kg, and intravenous acetaminophen use. Differences from current US practice include defining acute ingestion as an ingestion presentation from 4 to 24 hours after overdose was initiated. A revised form of the Rumack-Matthew nomogram was developed. The term massive ingestion was replaced with the term high-risk ingestion and denoted by a specific nomogram line. Other recommendations include specific criteria for emergency department triage, laboratory evaluation and monitoring parameters, defining the role of gastrointestinal decontamination, detailed management of acetylcysteine treatment, associated adverse effects, and stopping criteria for acetylcysteine treatment, as well as criteria for consultation with a clinical toxicologist. Finally, specific treatment considerations, including acetylcysteine dosing, fomepizole administration, and considerations for extracorporeal elimination and transplant evaluation, were addressed. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study provides a consensus statement on consistent evidence-based recommendations for medical, pharmacy, and nursing education and practice to optimize care of patients with acetaminophen poisoning.

Are antimuscarinic effects common in hydroxyzine overdose? A cohort analysis of antimuscarinic effects in hydroxyzine and diphenhydramine-poisoned patients.

INTRODUCTION: Exposures to hydroxyzine, a first-generation H1 antihistamine, have increased rapidly over the last two decades. Many assumptions about hydroxyzine poisoning are based on other antihistamines, like diphenhydramine. However, the receptor affinities of hydroxazine suggest that there should be fewer antimuscarinic findings than diphenhydramine. METHODS: This was a cohort study that compared hydroxyzine and diphenhydramine exposures reported to the National Poison Data System between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2020, and the Toxicologic Investigators Consortium Core Registry between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was to assess for antimuscarinic findings in hydroxyzine-poisoned patients, using diphenhydramine-poisoned patients as a comparison group. The secondary outcomes were to assess for markers of overall toxicity. Inclusion criteria were single-substance exposures with known outcomes. Exclusion criteria for National Poison Data System exposures were chronic exposures, unintentional exposures, and patients younger than 12 years old. There were no exclusion criteria for exposures reported to the Toxicologic Investigators Consortium Core Registry. RESULTS: There were 17,265 hydroxyzine and 102,354 diphenhydramine exposures reported to the National Poison Data System and 134 hydroxyzine and 1,484 diphenhydramine exposures reported to the Toxicologic Investigators Consortium Core Registry that met inclusion criteria. In both datasets, hydroxyzine-poisoned patients had lower rates and relative risk of developing antimuscarinic findings or receiving physostigmine, with the exception of hyperthermia in the Toxicologic Investigators Consortium Core Registry dataset. Coma/central nervous system depression (major), respiratory depression, seizures, ventricular dysrhythmias, intubation, and benzodiazepine administration were less likely in hydroxyzine-poisoned patients, but central nervous system depression (mild) was more likely in exposures reported to the National Poison Data System. The mortality in hydroxyzine-poisoned patients was rare: 0.02% and 0.8% of exposures reported to the National Poison Data System and Toxicologic Investigators Consortium Core Registry, respectively. DISCUSSION: The clinical manifestations of hydroxyzine exposures are consistent with the pharmacology of hydroxazine. The clinical effects were consistent across two United States national datasets. Clinicians should not generalize the illness script of diphenhydramine exposures to hydroxyzine exposures. CONCLUSIONS: Hydroxyzine-poisoned patients were less likely to develop antimuscarinic findings than diphenhydramine-poisoned patients. Hydroxyzine-poisoned patients were more likely to have mild central nervous system depression than an antimuscarinic toxidrome.

A Multi-Omic Mosaic Model of Acetaminophen Induced Alanine Aminotransferase Elevation.

BACKGROUND: Acetaminophen (APAP) is the most common cause liver injury following alcohol in US patients. Predicting liver injury and subsequent hepatic regeneration in patients taking therapeutic doses of APAP may be possible using new 'omic methods such as metabolomics and genomics. Multi'omic techniques increase our ability to find new mechanisms of injury and regeneration. METHODS: We used metabolomic and genomic data from a randomized controlled trial of patients administered 4 g of APAP per day for 14 days or longer with blood samples obtained at 0 (baseline), 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 days. We used the highest ALT as the clinical outcome to be predicted in our integrated analysis. We used penalized regression to model the relationship between genetic variants and day 0 metabolite level, and then performed a metabolite-wide colocalization scan to associate the genetically regulated component of metabolite expression with ALT elevation. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) analyses were conducted for ALT elevation and metabolite level using linear regression, with age, sex, and the first five principal components included as covariates. Colocalization was tested via a weighted sum test. RESULTS: Out of the 164 metabolites modeled, 120 met the criteria for predictive accuracy and were retained for genetic analyses. After genomic examination, eight metabolites were found to be under genetic control and predictive of ALT elevation due to therapeutic acetaminophen. The metabolites were: 3-oxalomalate, allantoate, diphosphate, L-carnitine, L-proline, maltose, and ornithine. These genes are important in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), urea breakdown pathway, glutathione production, mitochondrial energy production, and maltose metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: This multi'omic approach can be used to integrate metabolomic and genomic data allowing identification of genes that control downstream metabolites. These findings confirm prior work that have identified mitochondrial energy production as critical to APAP induced liver injury and have confirmed our prior work that demonstrate the importance of the urea cycle in therapeutic APAP liver injury.

Genetic variants associated with ALT elevation from therapeutic acetaminophen.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested genetic variants associated with acetaminophen induced liver injury (DILI) following overdose. Genetic variation associated with acetaminophen-induced alanine aminotransferase elevation during therapeutic dosing has not been examined. METHODS: We performed genetic analyses on patients that ingested therapeutic doses of 4 grams of acetaminophen for up to 16 days. We examined 20 genes previously implicated in the metabolism of acetaminophen or the development of immune-mediated DILI using the Illumina Multi-Ethnic Global Array 2. Autosomes were aligned and imputed using TOPMed. A candidate gene region analysis was performed by testing each gene individually using linkage disequilibrium (LD) pruned variants with the adaptive sum of powered scores (aSPU) test from the aSPU R package. The highest measured ALT during therapy, the maximum ALT, was used as the outcome. RESULTS: 192 subjects taking therapeutic APAP were included in the genetic analysis. 136 (70.8%) were female, 133 (69.2%) were Caucasian race, and the median age was 34 years (IQR: 26, 46). Age > 50 years was the only clinical factor associated with maximum ALT increase. Variants in SULT1E1, the gene responsible for Sulfotransferase Family 1E Member 1 enzyme production, were associated with maximum ALT. No single variant drove this association, but rather the association was due to the additive effects of numerous variants within the gene. No other genes were associated with maximum ALT increase in this cohort. CONCLUSION: Acetaminophen induced ALT elevation at therapeutic doses was not associated with variation in most genes associated with acetaminophen metabolism or immune-induced DILI in this cohort. The role of SULT1E1 polymorphism in acetaminophen-induced elevated ALT needs further examination.

Significance of temperature in antimuscarinic toxicity: a case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Antimuscarinic toxicity can result in temperature dysregulation, but the clinical significance of this is unclear. The objective of this study was to compare peak temperatures between antimuscarinic patients with and without severe clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a case-control analysis at two large, urban, academic medical centers from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2021. We compared peak temperature (Tmax) amongst antimuscarinic patients who experienced severe outcomes with those who did not. Severe outcome was defined as seizure, ventricular dysrhythmia, hypotension, or intubation. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients met inclusion criteria of which 23 developed severe outcomes: 16 seizures, 9 cases with hypotension, 5 intubations, and 2 ventricular dysrhythmias. Tmax amongst all patients ranged from 36.4-39.2 °C. There were no fatalities. There was no difference in Tmax in the emergency department or throughout hospitalization between groups, and Tmax was not predictive for the development of severe outcomes. DISCUSSION: Maximum temperatures did not differ between patients with and without severe outcomes in the setting of antimuscarinic toxicity, and temperature was poorly predictive of outcomes. Our findings suggest that mild temperature dysregulation in antimuscarinic toxicity is not a key prognostic indicator for severe outcome. Further study is needed to assess implication of severe hyperthermia.

Metabolomic Evaluation of N-Acetyl-p-Benzoquinone Imine Protein Adduct Formation with Therapeutic Acetaminophen Administration: Sex-based Physiologic Differences.

BACKGROUND: Acetaminophen (APAP)-associated transaminase elevation, induced by N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI) protein adduction, remains an area of research interest. Distinct from known genetic, physiologic, and dosage associations dictating severity of hepatic injury, no known factors predict an absence of protein adduct formation at therapeutic APAP dosing. HYPOTHESIS: Sex-based physiology is predictive of APAP-induced protein adduct formation and differential metabolite expression at therapeutic doses. METHODS: This retrospective study interrogated serum samples collected for a prior study investigating fluctuations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) over time with 4G daily APAP dosing for ≥ 16 days in subjects from Denver, Colorado. Subjects were grouped by adduct formation (n = 184) vs no adducts (n = 20). Samples were run on ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry from study days 0, 7, 16, and 31. Significant metabolite expressions were identified using t-tests with false discovery rate correction (FDR), partial least squares discriminant, and ANOVA simultaneous comparison analyses. Demographic and clinical data were explored using t-tests with FDR (age, weight, BMI, ALT) and Chi-square (sex, ethnicity, race) analyses. RESULTS: In pre-treatment samples, relative quantitation caprylic acid was expressed ninefold higher and 6-carboxyhexanoate was expressed threefold lower in subjects who did not develop adducts. Lactate had greater expression in the no adducts group (p = 0.001). Using absolute quantitation, glutathione was expressed 2.6-fold greater among no adduct subjects. Odds of males developing NAPQI protein adducts at therapeutic APAP dosing were 5.91 times lower than females (95% CI = 2.3-14.9; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Multiple metabolites were differentially expressed based on adduct group and sex. Metabolites were identified unique to adduct development independent of sex. At therapeutic APAP dosing, males were less likely to develop APAP protein adducts. Further research into lipid biosynthesis and metabolism may provide further insight into physiology associated with adduct production.

Metabolomic markers predictive of hepatic adaptation to therapeutic dosing of acetaminophen.

BACKGROUND: Drug induced liver injury (DILI) remains a prominent global issue and acetaminophen (APAP) overdose represents a common cause of hepatic injury and DILI. Transient alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations have been documented while adhering to recommended daily dosing. However, no metabolites have been identified in pre-treatment samples predicting which patients will develop these transient increases. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of samples collected from a parent study describing the course of ALT levels in subjects receiving therapeutic APAP dosing. Two hundred and four subjects recruited from Denver, Colorado received 4 g APAP/daily for at least 16 days. Subjects were grouped by ALT at any monitored time point above 60 units/L (n = 25) vs. no increase (n = 179). Serum samples from days 0, 7, 16, and 31 were run on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. We report the metabolomic results of samples analyzed prior to APAP administration and over time. Significant changes in metabolite and demographic variable expressions were explored using t-tests with false discovery rate correction, chi square, and partial least squares discriminant analyses. RESULTS: Within pre-treatment day 0 samples, allantoate and ornithine were significantly elevated in subjects of the ALT elevation group (p = .032). Baseline ALT (p = .011) and alkaline phosphatase (p = .006) were also significant. These metabolites were significant independent of race, ethnicity, gender, or BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Allantoate and ornithine are directly involved in pathways related to nitrogen release and urea production. Further investigation into alterations in the glutathione metabolism and urea cycle pathways may lead to a greater understanding of the mechanisms associated with hepatic adaptation for a variety of pharmaceuticals.

Quantification of prenatal marijuana use: evaluation of the correlation between self-report, serum, urine and umbilical cord assays among women delivering at two urban Colorado hospitals.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To estimate during pregnancy correlations between frequency of self-reported use of marijuana and quantified marijuana metabolite in biospecimens including urine, sera and umbilical cord homogenate. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Two urban hospitals in Colorado with legal recreational and medicinal marijuana. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women (<16 weeks gestation) self-reporting marijuana use. MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed a written self-report survey and provided biospecimens at <16 weeks gestation (n = 46), 18 to 22 weeks gestation (n = 43), 32 to 36 weeks gestation (n = 39), and delivery (n = 37). Self-reported marijuana use frequency was calculated based on past-month days of use multiplied by number of daily uses. Maternal urine and sera were tested for presence (>5 ng/mL) of 11-nor-9-carboxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH). Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry quantified THC-COOH in umbilical cord homogenate (ng/g). Last marijuana use by any measure was recorded to evaluate the time frame over which THC-COOH remains detectable (>0.10 ng/g) in cord. FINDINGS: From December 2017 through May 2019, 51 pregnant women enrolled, and 46 were included in analyses (2 withdrew and 3 had a spontaneous abortion). The majority were normal weight, White or Black race, and insured by Medicaid. At the time of enrollment between 7 to 15 weeks' gestation, 87% had ongoing use by self-report, or positive urine or serum. The majority (33 [66%]) stopped using before delivery. Sera and urine results were strongly correlated with self-reported use frequency (Spearman correlation coefficient [r] range 0.70-0.87 across visits, P < 0.001), and with each other. There was only one positive cord result when use stopped before 22 weeks. Frequency of self-reported marijuana use at delivery had strong correlation with quantified cord THC-COOH (r = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.62-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Quantified umbilical cord THC-COOH appears to strongly correlate with frequency of maternal marijuana use in the last month of pregnancy. Earlier use can be measured by either quantitative urine or serum assay.

Early Outcomes of Bivalirudin Therapy for Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia and Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis After Ad26.COV2.S Vaccination.

Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia is a newly described disease process in the setting of expanding access to COVID-19 vaccination. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends treatment with an alternative to heparin in patients suspected of having vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia. At this time there have been no reported outcomes from the treatment of vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia with bivalirudin as a heparin alternative. We describe the early outcomes from the treatment of vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia with bivalirudin as a heparin alternative. A 40-year-old Caucasian woman was found to have thrombocytopenia, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism following vaccination for COVID-19 with Ad26.COV2.S. She exhibited a steady rise in platelet count: 20×109/L at hospital day 0, 115×109/L at discharge on hospital day 6, and 182×109/L on outpatient follow-up on day 9. While the patient exhibited a transient drop in hemoglobin, there was no clinical evidence of bleeding. This patient did not demonstrate any clinical sequelae of thrombosis, and she reported resolution of her headache. Vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S appears to be associated with a small but significant risk for thrombotic thrombocytopenia within 13 days of receipt. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance to consider an alternative to heparin was not accompanied by specifically recommended alternatives. A single patient treated with bivalirudin for suspected vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia subsequently experienced symptom improvement and a rise in platelet count and did not demonstrate any immediate negative outcomes. A provider may consider bivalirudin as an alternative to heparin in patients with suspected vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia following Ad26.COV2.S vaccination, pending more definitive research.

Approach to the Poisoned Patient.

Audience: This video lecture is appropriate for emergency medical providers who are not comfortable with initial assessment of poisoned patients. Ideal learners include medical students and residents. Introduction: Poisoning is the leading cause of injury-related mortality in the United States, with more than 40,000 deaths annually.1 Of all ED injury-related visits, 2.4% are related to poisoning.2 While providers may have access to support services (poison control center, medical toxicology consulting service), they are often responsible for the initial evaluation of poisoned patients. While a large portion of poisoned patients have good outcomes regardless of the care they receive, inappropriate risk assessment and lack of knowledge about basic interventions can put patients at risk. A standardized approach as outlined in the video will help evaluate and treat the vast majority of poisoned patients. Educational Objectives: By the end of the lecture, learners should be able to: 1) initiate the evaluation of a poisoned patient, 2) identify key interventions to support airway, breathing, and circulation, 3) identify the three components of risk assessment in the poisoned patient, 4) list the four options for gastric decontamination, and 5) select standard diagnostic labs and tests commonly used in evaluating poisoned patients. Educational Methods: This is an enhanced live action greenscreen recording with video animation. Research Methods: This video has been made available for a variety of learners on social medial (Facebook and YouTube) and written feedback has been collected on YouTube. Results: The video has been seen over three thousand times and has received positive comments on social media (Facebook, YouTube). Comments include "dropping some tox knowledge bombs, proving yet again that #ToxRocks," and "This is an excellent talk, thank you very much, but I think it would be worth mentioning antidotes." Discussion: The goal is to expose learners to basic concepts in approaching poisoned patients and focusses on cognitive knowledge and diagnostic frameworks. The learner may watch the on-demand video as part of a flipped classroom experience with clinical cases, or as a just-in-time resource before seeing a patient who has been poisoned. Topics: Poisoning, resuscitation, risk assessment, gastric decontamination, occult ingestion, supportive care.

The Genomics of Elevated ALT and Adducts in Therapeutic Acetaminophen Treatment: a Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic acetaminophen (APAP) ingestion causes asymptomatic drug-induced liver injury in some patients. In most cases, elevations in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are transient and return to the normal range, even with continued APAP ingestion, though ALT elevation persists in some patients unpredictably. The etiology of this liver injury or adaption is unclear. Our objective was to identify new pharmacogenomic variants associated with elevated ALT or elevated protein adduct concentrations in patients receiving therapeutic acetaminophen. METHODS: We performed genome-wide sequencing analysis on eight patients using leftover blood samples from an observational study that administered four grams of acetaminophen for up to 16 days to all patients. Two patients with ALT elevations > two times the upper limit of normal, two patients with no adduct formation, and four control patients were sequenced. The genomes were aligned with the GRCh38 reference sequence, and variants with predicted low, moderate, or high impact on the subsequent proteins were first manually curated for biologic plausibility, then organized and examined in the REACTOME pathway analysis program. RESULTS: We found 394 variants in 107 genes associated with elevated ALT. Variants associated with ALT elevation predominantly involved genes in the immune system (MHC class II complex genes), endoplasmic reticulum stress response (SEC23B and XBP1), oxidative phosphorylation (NDUFB9), and WNT/beta-catenin signaling (FZD5). Variants associated with elevated adducts were primarily in signal transduction (MUC20) and DNA repair mechanisms (P53). CONCLUSIONS: While underpowered, genetic variants in immune system genes may be associated with drug-induced liver injury at therapeutic doses of acetaminophen.

Physician attitudes on buprenorphine induction in the emergency department: results from a multistate survey.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Emergency Departments (ED) are rapidly becoming an important location for initiation of buprenorphine (EDBUP) for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Previous investigations of emergency medicine physicians' perceived barriers and attitudes toward EDBUP exclusively sampled from urban, academic-affiliated physicians. We administered a multistate survey to an institutionally and geographically diverse collection of emergency medicine physicians to better understand the professional opinions of EDBUP implementation across a variety of practice settings. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey study used an online survey instrument to convenience sample emergency medicine physicians. In order to sample from various practice environments, participants were identified from (1) statewide ACEP chapters and (2) Facebook groups exclusive to emergency medicine physicians. The survey explored physicians' attitudes of EDBUP adoption and the perceived barriers to doing so. RESULTS: 162 emergency medicine physicians completed the survey. 76% of respondents agreed that emergency medicine physicians should offer EDBUP in the treatment of OUD. When stratified by practice setting and X-waiver status, 96% of X-waivered physicians, 73% of academic physicians, 49% of non-academic physicians, and 34% of non-X-waivered physicians felt comfortable initiating EDBUP. Lack of access to outpatient MOUD referral was the most frequently cited barrier to EDBUP across all practice settings. CONCLUSIONS: An institutionally and geographically diverse group of emergency medicine physicians endorsed substantial support for EDBUP. Emergency medicine physicians practicing in different clinical environments endorsed similar barriers to EDBUP implementation.

A randomized trial comparing physostigmine vs lorazepam for treatment of antimuscarinic (anticholinergic) toxidrome.

BACKGROUND: Toxicity from antimuscarinic agents precipitates a constellation of signs and symptoms; two of the most significant are agitation and delirium. Benzodiazepines are commonly used for treatment; physostigmine is also effective but is underutilized due to concerns for safety and short duration of action. The objective of this study was to compare lorazepam to physostigmine for the treatment of antimuscarinic delirium and agitation. METHODS: This was a blinded, randomized clinical trial in patients presenting for antimuscarinic toxidrome. Inclusion criteria were: ≥10-<18 years old, at least one central and two peripheral antimuscarinic symptoms, delirium and moderate agitation. Subjects were randomized to either (1) lorazepam bolus (0.05 mg/kg) followed by a 4-h normal saline infusion, or (2) physostigmine 0.02 mg/kg bolus followed by a 4-h physostigmine infusion (0.02 mg/kg/h). Primary outcomes were the control of delirium and agitation after bolus and during the infusion. RESULTS: Ten (53%) subjects were enrolled in the lorazepam arm, 9 (47%) in the physostigmine arm. Diphenhydramine was the most common agent ingested (16, 84%). Fewer patients receiving physostigmine had delirium after the initial bolus (44% vs 100%, p = 0.01) and at the 4th hour of infusion (22% vs 100%, p < 0.001) compared to patients who received lorazepam. There was a significant decrease in agitation scores in the physostigmine arm compared to the lorazepam arm after the initial bolus (89% vs 30%, p = 0.02), but no difference at the 4th hour of infusion (p > 0.99). There were no seizures, bradycardia, bronchorrhea, bronchospasm, intubation, or cardiac dysrhythmias. CONCLUSION: Physostigmine was superior to lorazepam in controlling antimuscarinic delirium and agitation after bolus dosing, and control of delirium after a 4-h infusion. There were no serious adverse events in either treatment arm. Physostigmine bolus and infusion should be considered in adolescent patients with significant delirium and agitation from antimuscarinic agents.

Association of Emergency Department Opioid Administration With Ongoing Opioid Use: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Patients With Back Pain.

OBJECTIVES: Opioids are commonly administered in the emergency department (ED) and prescribed for the treatment of back pain. It is important to understand the unintended consequences of this approach to inform treatment decisions and the consideration of alternative treatments. Recent evidence has shown that ED opioid prescriptions are associated with future opioid use. The objective of this study was to measure the association of opioid administration in the ED to patients treated for back pain with future opioid use. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of opioid-naïve adults discharged from the ED with a diagnosis of back pain. Patients were stratified by opioid therapy (none, ED administration only, prescription only, or ED administration + prescription). Relative risks of ongoing opioid use (filling >90-day supply in 180 days following ED visit as documented in the prescription drug monitoring program) were calculated for each opioid-therapy group and compared to the no-opioid group. RESULTS: We identified 24,487 opioid naïve back pain patients. The median age was 38 years, 55% were female, and 56% were non-Hispanic white. A total of 41% received no opioid, 10% were only administered an opioid in the ED, 18% only received a prescription, and 31% received an opioid in the ED + prescription. The adjusted relative risks of ongoing use compared to the no opioid group were as follows: ED only 1.9, prescription only 2.1, and ED + prescription 2.3. The increased risk persisted for other definitions of ongoing use and after adjustment for baseline pain scores. CONCLUSIONS: For opioid-naïve patients with back pain, both administration of an opioid in the ED and opioid prescriptions are associated with a doubling of the risk of ongoing opioid use compared to patients not treated with opioids. This supports the consideration of minimizing exposure to opioids while treating back pain in the ED.