Differential in vitro susceptibility to ampicillin/ceftriaxone combination therapy among Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis clinical isolates.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the genomic diversity and ß-lactam susceptibilities of Enterococcus faecalis collected from patients with infective endocarditis (IE). METHODS: We collected 60 contemporary E. faecalis isolates from definite or probable IE cases identified between 2018 and 2021 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. We used whole-genome sequencing to study bacterial genomic diversity and employed antibiotic checkerboard assays and a one-compartment pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to investigate bacterial susceptibility to ampicillin and ceftriaxone both alone and in combination. RESULTS: Genetically diverse E. faecalis were collected, however, isolates belonging to two STs, ST6 and ST179, were collected from 21/60 (35%) IE patients. All ST6 isolates encoded a previously described mutation upstream of penicillin-binding protein 4 (pbp4) that is associated with pbp4 overexpression. ST6 isolates had higher ceftriaxone MICs and higher fractional inhibitory concentration index values for ampicillin and ceftriaxone (AC) compared to other isolates, suggesting diminished in vitro AC synergy against this lineage. Introduction of the pbp4 upstream mutation found among ST6 isolates caused increased ceftriaxone resistance in a laboratory E. faecalis isolate. PK/PD testing showed that a representative ST6 isolate exhibited attenuated efficacy of AC combination therapy at humanized antibiotic exposures. CONCLUSIONS: We find evidence for diminished in vitro AC activity among a subset of E. faecalis IE isolates with increased pbp4 expression. These findings suggest that alternate antibiotic combinations against diverse contemporary E. faecalis IE isolates should be evaluated.

In vitro activity of clindamycin, doxycycline, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole against clinical isolates of ß-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. via BD Phoenix and broth microdilution.

We tested 85 isolates of ß-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. against trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), clindamycin, and doxycycline by broth microdilution (BMD) and BD Phoenix. Susceptibility rates via BMD for TMP/SMX, clindamycin, and doxycycline were 100%, 85.5%, and 56.6%, respectively. TMP/SMX is a potential monotherapy agent for ß-hemolytic Streptococcus skin and soft tissue infections.

Mutations in ompK36 differentially impact in vitro synergy of meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftazidime/avibactam in combination with other antibiotics against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Objectives: Ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are preferred agents for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections and are often used in combination with other agents. We aimed to characterize the synergy of combinations against KPC-Kp with varying ompK36 genotypes. Methods: KPC-Kp that harboured ompK36 WT, IS5 or glycine-aspartic acid duplication (GD) genotypes were selected. MICs were determined in triplicate. Synergy was assessed by time-kill assays for ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam in combination with colistin, gentamicin, tigecycline, meropenem or fosfomycin against 1 × 108 cfu/mL KPC-Kp. Results: KPC-Kp harboured ompK36 WT (n = 5), IS5 (n = 5) or GD (n = 5); 11 were KPC-2 and 4 were KPC-3. All were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. In time-kill analysis, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam 1 × MIC exhibited mean 24 h log-kills of -2.01 and -0.84, respectively. Ceftazidime/avibactam was synergistic in combination with colistin independent of ompK36 genotype. Ceftazidime/avibactam combinations impacted by porin mutations (compared to WT) were meropenem (-5.18 versus -6.62 mean log-kill, P < 0.001) and fosfomycin (-3.98 versus -6.58, P = 0.058). Mean log-kills with meropenem/vaborbactam were greatest in combination with gentamicin (-5.36). In the presence of porin mutations, meropenem/vaborbactam killing activity was potentiated by the addition of colistin (-6.65 versus -0.70, P = 0.03) and fosfomycin (-3.12 versus 1.54, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Our results shed new light on the synergy of ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam combinations against KPC-Kp with or without porin mutations. Killing activity of ceftazidime/avibactam with other cell wall active agents was decreased against isolates with porin mutations. On the other hand, some meropenem/vaborbactam combinations demonstrated enhanced killing in the presence of porin mutations.

Impact of ompk36 genotype and KPC subtype on the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae clinical isolates.

Objectives: The availability of new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam have redefined contemporary treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections. We aimed to characterize and contrast the in vitro activity of these agents against genetically diverse KPC-Kp clinical isolates. Methods: We analysed genomes of 104 non-consecutive KPC-Kp isolates and compared the in vitro antibiotic activity by KPC subtype and ompK36 genotype. MICs were determined in triplicate by CLSI methods. Twenty representative isolates were selected for time-kill analyses against physiological steady-state and trough concentrations, as well as 4× MIC for each agent. Results: Fifty-eight percent and 42% of isolates harboured KPC-2 and KPC-3, respectively. OmpK36 mutations were more common among KPC-2- compared with KPC-3-producing Kp (P < 0.0001); mutations were classified as IS5 insertion, glycine-aspartic acid insertion at position 134 (GD duplication) and other mutations. Compared to isolates with WT ompK36, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam MICs were elevated for isolates with IS5 by 2-, 4- and 16-fold, respectively (P < 0.05 for each). Against isolates with GD duplication, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam MICs were increased, but ceftazidime/avibactam MICs were not. In time-kill studies, ceftazidime/avibactam-mediated killing correlated with ceftazidime/avibactam MICs, and did not vary across ompK36 genotypes. Imipenem/relebactam was not bactericidal against any isolate at trough concentrations. At steady-state imipenem/relebactam concentrations, regrowth occurred more commonly for isolates with IS5 mutations. Log-kills were lower in the presence of meropenem/vaborbactam for isolates with GD duplication compared with IS5 mutations. Conclusions: Our investigation identified key genotypes that attenuate, to varying degrees, the in vitro activity for each of the new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors. Additional studies are needed to translate the importance of these observations into clinical practice.

In Vitro Susceptibility of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa following Treatment-Emergent Resistance to Ceftolozane-Tazobactam.

We compared the in vitro susceptibility of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected before and after treatment-emergent resistance to ceftolozane-tazobactam. Median baseline and postexposure ceftolozane-tazobactam MICs were 2 and 64 µg/ml, respectively. Whole-genome sequencing identified treatment-emergent mutations in ampC among 79% (11/14) of paired isolates. AmpC mutations were associated with cross-resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam but increased susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam and imipenem. A total of 81% (12/16) of ceftolozane-tazobactam-resistant isolates with ampC mutations were susceptible to imipenem-relebactam.

Early Experience With Meropenem-Vaborbactam for Treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections.

Twenty patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections were treated with meropenem-vaborbactam. Thirty-day clinical success and survival rates were 65% (13/20) and 90% (18/20), respectively. Thirty-five percent of patients had microbiologic failures within 90 days. One patient developed a recurrent infection due to meropenem-vaborbactam-nonsusceptible, ompK36 porin mutant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Effects of KPC Variant and Porin Genotype on the In Vitro Activity of Meropenem-Vaborbactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Meropenem-vaborbactam is a new agent with the potential to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. We describe the in vitro activity of meropenem-vaborbactam against representative CRE genotypes and laboratory-engineered Escherichia coli isolates harboring mutant blaKPC genes associated with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. We also compared disk diffusion and gradient strip testing methods to standard broth microdilution methods. Against 120 CRE isolates, median ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam MICs were 1 and 0.03 µg/ml, respectively. Ninety-eight percent (117/120) of isolates were susceptible to meropenem-vaborbactam (MICs ≤ 4 µg/ml). Against Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates harboring mutant blaKPC, the addition of vaborbactam lowered the meropenem MICs in 78% of isolates (14/18); 100% were susceptible to meropenem-vaborbactam. Median meropenem-vaborbactam MICs were higher against K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae isolates with mutant ompK36 porin genes (n = 26) than against those with wild-type ompK36 porin genes (n = 54) (0.25 versus 0.03 µg/ml; P < 0.0001). Against E. coli TOP10 isolates with plasmid constructs containing wild-type blaKPC or mutant blaKPC, the addition of vaborbactam at 8 µg/ml lowered the meropenem MICs 2- to 512-fold, resulting in meropenem-vaborbactam MICs of 0.03 µg/ml. The rates of categorical agreement with broth microdilution for disk diffusion or gradient strips ranged from 90 to 95%. Essential agreement rates were higher for research-use-only (RUO) gradient strips manufactured by bioMérieux (82%) than for those manufactured by Liofilchem (48%) (P < 0.0001). Taken together, our data highlight the potent in vitro activity of meropenem-vaborbactam against CRE, including isolates resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Vaborbactam inhibited both wild-type and variant KPC enzymes. On the other hand, KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates with ompK36 mutations displayed higher meropenem-vaborbactam MICs than isolates with wild-type ompK36 The results of susceptibility testing with RUO bioMérieux gradient strips most closely aligned with those of broth microdilution methods.