High-Functioning Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant System Characteristics: The British Columbia Experience With an Opt-In System.

Rationale & Objective: A high level of cooperation between organ procurement organizations and transplant programs may help maximize use of deceased donor kidneys. The practices that are essential for a high functioning organ donation and transplant system remain uncertain. We sought to report metrics of organ donation and transplant performance in British Columbia, Canada, and to assess the association of specific policies and practices that contribute to the system's performance. Study Design: A retrospective observational study. Setting & Participants: Referred deceased organ donors in British Columbia were used in the study from January 1, 2016, to December 31 2019. Exposures: Provincial, organ procurement organization, and center level policies were implemented to improve donor referral and organ utilization. Outcomes: Assessment of donor and kidney utilization along steps of the critical pathway for organ donation. Analytical Approach: Deceased donors were classified according to the critical pathway for organ donation and key donation and transplant metrics were identified. Results: There were 1,948 possible donors referred. Of 1,948, 754 (39%) were potential donors. Of 754 potential donors, 587 (78%) were consented donors. Of 587 consented donors, 480 (82%) were eligible kidney donors. Of 480 eligible kidney donors, 438 (91%) were actual kidney donors. And of 438 actual kidney donors, 432 (99%) were utilized kidney donors. One-year all-cause allograft survival was 95%. Practices implemented to improve the system's performance included hospital donor coordinators, early communication between the organ procurement organization and transplant nephrologists, dedicated organ recovery and implant surgeons, aged-based kidney allocation, and hospital admission of recipients before kidney recovery. Limitations: Assignment of causality between individual policies and practices and organ donation and utilization is limited in this observational study. Conclusions: In British Columbia, consent for donation, utilization of donated kidneys, and transplant survival are exceptionally high, suggesting the importance of an integrated deceased donor and kidney transplant service.

Optimization of all possible opportunities for deceased donor kidney donation and transplantation is essential to meet the need for transplantation. We examined the performance of organ procurement and transplant in a deceased organ donor system in British Columbia, Canada, and reviewed policies and practices that may contribute to the system's performance. We found a high level of donation, transplantation, and survival of donated kidneys and identified policies and practices that likely contribute to the system's performance.

Health System-Level Barriers to Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Protocol for a Comparative Case Study Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best treatment option for patients with kidney failure and offers significant medical and economic advantages for both patients and health systems. Despite this, rates of LDKT in Canada have stagnated and vary significantly across Canadian provinces, the reasons for which are not well understood. Our prior work has suggested that system-level factors may be contributing to these differences. Identifying these factors can help inform system-level interventions to increase LDKT. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to generate a systemic interpretation of LDKT delivery across provincial health systems with variable performance. We aim to identify the attributes and processes that facilitate the delivery of LDKT to patients, and those that create barriers and compare these across systems with variable performance. These objectives are contextualized within our broader goal of increasing rates of LDKT in Canada, particularly in lower-performing provinces. METHODS: This research takes the form of a qualitative comparative case study analysis of 3 provincial health systems in Canada that have high, moderate, and low rates of LDKT performance (the percentage of LDKT to all kidney transplantations performed). Our approach is underpinned by an understanding of health systems as complex adaptive systems that are multilevel and interconnected, and involve nonlinear interactions between people and organizations, operating within a loosely bounded network. Data collection will comprise semistructured interviews, document reviews, and focus groups. Individual case studies will be conducted and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Following this, our comparative analysis will operationalize resource-based theory to compare case study data and generate explanations for our research question. RESULTS: This project was funded from 2020 to 2023. Individual case studies were carried out between November 2020 and August 2022. The comparative case analysis will begin in December 2022 and is expected to conclude in April 2023. Submission of the publication is projected for June 2023. CONCLUSIONS: By investigating health systems as complex adaptive systems and making comparisons across provinces, this study will identify how health systems can improve the delivery of LDKT to patients with kidney failure. Our resource-based theory framework will provide a granular analysis of the attributes and processes that facilitate or create barriers to LDKT delivery across multiple organizations and levels of practice. Our findings will have practice and policy implications and help inform transferrable competencies and system-level interventions conducive to increasing LDKT. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/44172.

Identifying Modifiable System-Level Barriers to Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Introduction: Studying existing health systems with variable living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) performance and understanding factors that drive these differences can inform comprehensive system-level approaches to improve LDKT. We aimed to quantify previously identified barriers and estimate their association with LDKT performance. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of health professionals (HPs). Statements, rated on a Likert scale of "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree", captured themes related to communication; role perception; HP's education, training and comfort; attitudes; referral process; patient; as well as resources and infrastructure. The percentage who agreed with these statements was analyzed and compared by LDKT performance (living donation rates higher or lower than the national average) and participant characteristics. Results: We obtained 353 complete responses. Themes related to poor communication, poor role perception, and HPs education or training or comfort emerged as barriers to LDKT. When compared with HPs from high-performing provinces, those from low-performing provinces had lower odds of agreeing that their province promoted LDKT (adjusted odd ratio [aOR] = 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-0.48). They also had lower odds of initiating discussions about LDKT (aOR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.17-0.55), and higher odds of agreeing that the transplant team is best suited to discuss LDKT (aOR = 2.64, 95% CI: 1.60-4.33) and that more resources would increase LDKT discussions (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.25-3.40). Nonphysician role and less than 10 years of experience were associated with the level of agreement across several themes. Creating guidelines, streamlining evaluations, and improving communication were ranked as priorities to increase LDKT. Conclusion: There are system-level barriers to LDKT and some were more prevalent in low-performing provinces. Interventions to eliminate them should be implemented in conjunction with patient-level interventions as part of a comprehensive system-level approach to increase LDKT.

Health system barriers and facilitators to living donor kidney transplantation: a qualitative case study in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: In patients with kidney failure, living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best treatment option; yet, LDKT rates have stagnated in Canada and vary widely across provinces. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to LDKT in a high-performing health system. METHODS: This study was conducted using a qualitative exploratory case study of British Columbia. Data collection, conducted between October 2020 and January 2021, entailed document review and semistructured interviews with key stakeholders, including provincial leadership, care teams and patients. We recruited participants via purposive sampling and snowballing technique. We generated themes using thematic analysis. RESULTS: After analysis of interviews conducted with 22 participants (5 representatives from provincial organizations, 7 health care providers at transplant centres, 8 health care providers from regional units and 2 patients) and document review, we identified the following 5 themes as facilitators to LDKT: a centralized infrastructure, a mandate for timely intervention, an equitable funding model, a commitment to collaboration and cultivating distributed expertise. The relationship between 2 provincial organizations (BC Transplant and BC Renal Agency) was identified as key to enabling the mandate and processes for LDKT. Five barriers were identified that arose from silos between provincial organizations and manifested as inconsistencies in coordinating LDKT along the spectrum of care. These were divided accountability structures, disconnected care processes, missed training opportunities, inequitable access by region and financial burden for donors and recipients. INTERPRETATION: We found strong links between provincial infrastructure and the processes that facilitate or impede timely intervention and referral of patients for LDKT. Our findings have implications for policy-makers and provide opportunities for cross-jurisdictional comparative analyses.

Scurvy in the Intensive Care Unit.

Scurvy, caused by vitamin C deficiency, is a forgotten disease in the modern era of medicine. The prevalence of vitamin C deficiency in the United States is reported to be 7.1%. We present a case of a 56-year-old man with a history of chronic alcohol use who was admitted to the intensive care unit due to sepsis. He was found to have a rash on his hands and feet which consisted of palpable lesions as well as petechiae. Work up of the patient's skin pathology revealed ascorbic acid deficiency, also known as scurvy. This case highlights the importance of considering severe nutritional deficiency in patients with underlying alcohol use who present with skin findings that may mimic those of a vasculitis. Although rare, vitamin C deficiency still exists, and it is important to be aware of presenting signs and identify those who are at risk.

An Alternative Cause of Encephalopathy: Valerian Root Overdose.

The interest in alternative therapeutics use has increased over the past few decades. Valerian, also known as "plant Valium," is a popular choice as a natural remedy for insomnia or anxiety. In order to ensure patient safety, clinicians need to be knowledgeable about commonly used alternative therapeutic products, their mechanisms of action, and potential pharmacological interactions. We present an unusual case of encephalopathy due to the combination of Valerian root, a plant with putative sedating properties, along with a natural "γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) supplement." This case highlights the importance of thoroughly exploring alternative therapies when evaluating encephalopathy as well as the importance of being educated on the commonly used agents.

Immunoglobulin G-4-Related Retroperitoneal Fibrosis.

Retroperitoneal fibrosis is caused by the replacement of normal retroperitoneal tissue with fibrosis. The majority of the cases are idiopathic, but some secondary causes include malignancy, infection, drugs, and radiotherapy. Immunoglobulin G-4 (IgG-4) related disease is a relatively newer disease and one of the rarer causes of retroperitoneal fibrosis. It usually involves the pancreas, lungs, kidneys, aorta lacrimal and salivary glands, or extrapancreatic bile duct. Elevated serum IgG-4 is the biomarker of the disease and its levels correlate with disease activity. High-dose glucocorticoid is the treatment of choice.

Right Atrial Perforation Leading to Cardiac Tamponade Following Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), as a supportive modality for cardiopulmonary failure, is increasing in its use due to improved advances in technology and experience lending to availability and ease of implementation. Complications with ECMO are quite common, and with increasing use, an increase in complications are a natural result. These complications can be from the underlying disease process or from the ECMO process itself, including cannula insertion. One such complication includes perforation of surrounding structures at site of insertion. We will present a case of right atrial perforation after single lumen cannula insertion, which led to development of cardiac tamponade and subsequently cardiac arrest. In addition to cannula design, lack of wire rigidity can play a role in wire migration and injury to surrounding structures. We emphasize the importance of ultrasound guidance and surveillance with echocardiogram or fluoroscopy during ECMO cannulation, regardless of cannula type, to prevent fatal complications.

Canadian Society of Transplantation and Canadian Society of Nephrology Commentary on the 2017 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review an international guideline on the evaluation and care of living kidney donors and provide a commentary on the applicability of the recommendations to the Canadian donor population. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: We reviewed the 2017 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors and compared this guideline to the Canadian 2014 Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) Protocol for Participating Donors. METHODS: A working group was formed consisting of members from the Canadian Society of Transplantation and the Canadian Society of Nephrology. Members were selected to have representation from across Canada and in various subspecialties related to living kidney donation, including nephrology, surgery, transplantation, pediatrics, and ethics. KEY FINDINGS: Many of the KDIGO Guideline recommendations align with the KPD Protocol recommendations. Canadian researchers have contributed to much of the evidence on donor evaluation and outcomes used to support the KDIGO Guideline recommendations. LIMITATIONS: Certain outcomes and risk assessment tools have yet to be validated in the Canadian donor population. IMPLICATIONS: Living kidney donors should be counseled on the risks of postdonation outcomes given recent evidence, understanding the limitations of the literature with respect to its generalizability to the Canadian donor population.

JUSTIFICATION: Examiner une directive internationale sur l'évaluation et la prise en charge des donneurs vivants d'un rein et formuler un commentaire sur l'applicabilité de ces recommandations à la population des donneurs canadiens. SOURCES: Nous avons révisé le guide des pratiques cliniques relatives à l'évaluation et à la prise en charge des donneurs vivants d'un rein (Clinical Practice Guideline for Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors) de 2017 du KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) et nous l'avons comparé aux recommandations canadiennes de 2014 du Protocole de don croisé d'un rein par donneurs participants (Kidney Paired Donation Protocol for Participating Donors). MÉTHODOLOGIE: Un groupe de travail réunissant des membres de la Société canadienne de transplantation et de la Société canadienne de néphrologie a été formé. Les membres ont été sélectionnés pour représenter tout le Canada et plusieurs sous-spécialisations relatives au don vivant d'un rein, notamment la néphrologie, la chirurgie, la transplantation, la pédiatrie et l'éthique. PRINCIPALES CONSTATATIONS: Plusieurs des recommandations du KDIGO s'harmonisent aux recommandations du protocole de don croisé d'un rein. Les chercheurs canadiens ont contribué en grande partie aux données sur l'évaluation des donneurs et des résultats utilisées pour appuyer les recommandations formulées dans les lignes directrices du KDIGO. LIMITES: Certains résultats et outils d'évaluation des risques doivent encore être validés dans la population des donneurs canadiens. CONCLUSION: Compte tenu des plus récentes données, les donneurs vivants d'un rein devraient être mis en garde concernant les risques sur leur santé post-don, tout en comprenant les limites de la littérature en ce qui concerne leur généralisabilité à la population de donneurs canadiens.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation-induced consciousness.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation-induced consciousness (CPRIC) is a rare yet confusing event that can cause management issues during resuscitation. The reported incidence of CPRIC is increasing. Being aware of this phenomenon and developing a standardized approach for its management is important to prevent both delay and interruptions during resuscitation efforts. We present a patient who demonstrated purposeful movements suggesting consciousness during cardiopulmonary resuscitation that would repeatedly abate with cessation of chest compressions.

Bariatric Surgery Causing Hyperammonemia.

Bariatric surgery is recognized as a highly effective therapy for obesity but it does carry a risk of short term and long term complications since it results in a permanent alteration of the patient's anatomy. We present a case of 45-year-old female presented with a macular rash on extremities and facial rash from a rehabilitation center after having been discharged a month earlier from a revision surgery on her gastric bypass for anastomotic bleeding. She progressively became lethargic with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the brain showed symmetrically restricted diffusion concerning for hypoxic injury. Her ammonia levels were at 142 micromoles per liter (mmol/L) at the initial check which worsened to 432 mmol/L over a few days, despite treatment. Laboratory investigation later revealed her to be deficient in zinc along with many essential and nonessential amino acids. Supplemental nutrition was initiated, specifically fortifying her parenteral feeds with the essential amino acid combinations that were found deficient on testing. This lead to a slow but progressive improvement in encephalopathy. This case highlights the importance of understanding the short and long term complications of bariatric surgery. Although neurological complications are rare with peripheral neuropathy being the most common one, hyperammonemic encephalopathy is a very severe complication, with incompletely understood mechanisms and predispositions, frequently resulting in failure of recognition and subsequent delays in intervention.

Common Questions and Misconceptions in the Management of Renal Transplant Patients: A Guide for Health Care Providers in the Posttransplant Setting.

Once renal transplant recipients are stabilized and require less frequent follow-up with their transplant team, health care providers outside of the transplant setting play an integral role in patients' ongoing medical care. Given renal transplant recipients' inherent complexity, these health care providers often seek consult regarding decisions that may affect transplant-related medications or outcomes. In this review, we discuss answers to 10 of the questions commonly posed to our renal transplant team by other health care providers.

A vexing case of bone pain in a renal transplant recipient: Voriconazole-induced periostitis.

Immunosuppression increases the risk of opportunistic infections including fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Voriconazole is used to treat invasive aspergillus infections but prolonged usage may rarely lead to periostitis. Increased plasma fluoride concentration leading to osteoblastic upregulation is thought to be the catalyst, and symptom reversal occurs with discontinuation of the offending agent. A renal transplant recipient who was on voriconazole for invasive aspergillosis developed diffuse debilitating symmetrical bone pain. Having ruled out other neurological, metabolic, and drug etiologies, voriconazole-induced periostitis was diagnosed. Increased plasma fluoride level was documented, but bone scan was non-specific. A therapeutic discontinuation of voriconazole and switch to posaconazole provided rapid symptom resolution. The patient accidently restarted voriconazole as an outpatient resulting in the same symptomology, and thus provided further evidence that this was drug related. Voriconazole-induced periostitis is a described entity in immunosuppressed solid organ transplant patients who are treated with a prolonged course of voriconazole. This case study is novel in that it demonstrates drug induced periostitis in a renal transplant recipient who developed debilitating periostitis within a short time after starting voriconazole and equally rapid resolution once it was discontinued. We conclude that patients treated with voriconazole should be routinely monitored for periostitis.

An Examination of the Application of the Kidney Donor Risk Index in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: The Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) is a continuous measure of deceased donor kidney transplant failure risk that was derived in US patients based on 10 donor characteristics. In the United States, the KDRI is utilized to guide organ allocation and to inform clinical decisions regarding organ acceptance. OBJECTIVE: To examine the application of the US-derived KDRI in a large Canadian province. PATIENTS: All deceased donor kidney-only transplant recipients in British Columbia (BC) between 2005 and 2014. METHODS: We examined the predictive performance of KDRI in BC transplant recipients and compared the overall performance of KDRI with donor age alone in predicting transplant failure (from all causes including death). RESULTS: Donors in BC (N = 785) were older but included no black donors and few Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donors compared with the original derivation cohort of the KDRI in the United States. The KDRI was moderately predictive of transplant failure (c statistic, 0.63) and had similar predictive performance to donor age alone (c statistic, 0.64). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the US-derived KDRI does not improve the prediction of kidney transplant failure compared with donor age alone in a Canadian cohort and highlight the need to determine the applicability of KDRI in different regions.

CONTEXTE: L'indice Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) est une mesure continue du risque de rejet d'une greffe d'un rein provenant d'un donneur décédé. Cet indice est dérivé de patients étasuniens et repose sur dix caractéristiques associées au donneur. Aux États-Unis, l'indice KDRI est utilisé pour guider l'attribution des organes et pour éclairer la prise de décisions cliniques concernant l'acceptation des organes. OBJECTIF DE L'ÉTUDE: Vérifier l'application de l'indice KDRI étasunien dans une grande province canadienne. PARTICIPANTS: Tous les receveurs d'une greffe rénale simple en Colombie-Britannique entre 2005 et 2014, et dont l'organe provenait d'un donneur décédé ont été inclus. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons évalué la performance prédictive de l'indice KDRI chez les receveurs d'une greffe de rein. Nous avons aussi comparé la performance globale du KDRI pour la prédiction du rejet de la greffe (toutes causes confondues, y compris le décès) obtenue par rapport à une prédiction basée uniquement sur l'âge du donneur. RÉSULTATS: Comparativement à la cohorte américaine d'où dérive l'indice KDRI, les donneurs britanno-colombiens (N = 785) étaient plus âgés, mais aucun d'eux n'était d'origine afro-américaine et quelques-uns seulement étaient porteurs du virus de l'hépatite C. L'indice KDRI s'est avéré moyennement fiable pour prédire le rejet de la greffe (statistique C = 0,63) et présentait une performance prédictive comparable à celle mesurée à partir de l'âge du donneur seulement (statistique C = 0,64). CONCLUSION: Nos constatations évoquent que, dans une cohorte de patients canadiens, le recours à l'indice KDRI ne permet pas de prédire plus précisément le risque de rejet de la greffe que l'âge du donneur seulement. Ainsi, nos constatations mettent en lumière la nécessité d'évaluer l'applicabilité de l'indice KDRI dans différentes régions.

The Change in Living Kidney Donation in Women and Men in the United States (2005-2015): A Population-Based Analysis.

The factors underlying the decline in living kidney donation in the United States since 2005 must be understood to inform strategies to ensure access to this option for future patients. Population-based estimates provide a better assessment of donation activity than do trends in the number of living donor transplants. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the United States Census, we determined longitudinal changes in living kidney donation between 2005 and 2015, focusing on the effect of sex and income. We used multilevel Poisson models to adjust for differences in age, race, the incidence of ESRD, and geographic factors (including population density, urbanization, and daily commuting). During the study period, the unadjusted rate of donation was 30.1 and 19.3 per million population in women and men, respectively, and the adjusted incidence of donation was 44% higher in women (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.44; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.39 to 1.49). The incidence of donation was stable in women (IRR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.07) but declined in men (IRR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.83). Income was associated with longitudinal changes in donation in both sexes, yet donation was stable in the highest two population income quartiles in women but only in the highest income quartile in men. In both sexes, living related donations declined, irrespective of income. In conclusion, living donation declined in men but remained stable in women between 2005 and 2015, and income appeared to have a greater effect on living donation in men.

Variation in Dialysis Exposure Prior to Nonpreemptive Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in the United States and Its Association With Allograft Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The impact of dialysis exposure before nonpreemptive living donor kidney transplantation on allograft outcomes is uncertain. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adult first-time recipients of kidney-only living donor transplants in the United States who were recorded within the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for 2000 to 2016. FACTORS: Duration of pretransplantation dialysis exposure. OUTCOMES: Kidney transplant failure from any cause including death, death-censored transplant failure, and death with allograft function. RESULTS: Among the 77,607 living donor transplant recipients studied, longer pretransplantation dialysis exposure was independently associated with progressively higher risk for transplant failure from any cause, including death beginning 6 months after transplantation. Compared with patients with 0.1 to 3.0 months of dialysis exposure, the HR for transplant failure from any cause including death increased from 1.16 (95% CI, 1.07-1.31) among patients with 6.1 to 9.0 months of dialysis exposure to 1.60 (95% CI, 1.43-1.79) among patients with more than 60.0 months of dialysis exposure. Pretransplantation dialysis exposure varied markedly among centers; median exposures were 11.0 and 18.9 months for centers in the 10th and 90th percentiles of dialysis exposure, respectively. Centers with the highest proportions of living donor transplantations had the shortest pretransplantation dialysis exposures. In multivariable analysis, patients of black race, with low income, with nonprivate insurance, with less than high school education, and not working for income had longer pretransplantation dialysis exposures. Dialysis exposure in patients with these characteristics also varied 2-fold between transplantation centers. LIMITATIONS: Why longer dialysis exposure is associated with transplant failure could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS: Longer pretransplantation dialysis exposure in nonpreemptive living donor kidney transplantation is associated with increased risk for allograft failure. Pretransplantation dialysis exposure is associated with recipients' sociodemographic and transplantation centers' characteristics. Understanding whether limiting pretransplantation dialysis exposure could improve living donor transplant outcomes will require further study.

Evaluation of Heparin Anticoagulation Protocols in Post-Renal Transplant Recipients (EHAP-PoRT Study).

BACKGROUND: Disturbances in hemostasis are common among renal transplant recipients. Because of the risk of thromboembolism and graft loss after transplant, a prophylactic heparin protocol was implemented at St Paul's Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 2011. Therapeutic heparin is sometimes prescribed perioperatively for patients with preexisting prothrombotic conditions. There is currently limited literature on the safety and efficacy of heparin use in the early postoperative period. OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives were to document, for patients who underwent renal transplant, the incidence of major bleeding and of thrombosis in those receiving therapeutic heparin, prophylactic heparin, and no heparin anticoagulation in the early postoperative period and to compare these rates for the latter 2 groups. The secondary objectives included a comparison of the risk factors associated with major bleeding and thrombosis. METHODS: Adult patients who received a renal transplant at St Paul's Hospital between January 2008 and July 2013 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Electronic health records and databases were used to divide patients into the 3 heparin-use cohorts, to identify cases of major bleeding and thrombosis, and to characterize patients and events. The Fisher exact test was used for the primary outcome analysis, and descriptive statistics were used for all other outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 547 patients were included in the analysis. Major bleeding was observed in 6 (46%) of the 13 patients who received therapeutic heparin; no cases of thrombosis occurred in these patients. Major bleeding occurred in 8 (3.0%) of the 266 patients who received prophylactic heparin and 9 (3.4%) of the 268 who received no heparin (p > 0.99). Thrombosis occurred in 1 (0.4%) and 3 (1.1%) of these patients, respectively (p = 0.62). Major bleeding occurred more frequently among patients with a low-target heparin protocol, but 61% of values for partial thromboplastin time were above target. A larger proportion of deceased-donor transplant recipients who had major bleeding were taking antiplatelet agents, relative to living-donor transplant recipients. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic use of heparin increased the risk of bleeding among renal transplant recipients, but there were no cases of thrombosis. Prophylactic use of heparin did not increase the risk of bleeding and prevented proportionately more cases of thrombosis relative to no anticoagulation; this result supports the continued use of prophylaxis.

CONTEXTE: Les troubles de l'hémostase sont courants chez les patients ayant subi une transplantation rénale. Comme il existe des risques de thromboembolie et de perte du greffon après une greffe, un protocole d'administration d'héparine prophylactique a été mis en place en 2011 à l'hôpital Saint-Paul de Vancouver, en Colombie-Britannique. On prescrit parfois l'héparine thérapeutique en période périopératoire à certains patients affligés d'un état prothrombotique préexistant. Il n'y a actuellement que peu de documentation sur la sécurité et l'efficacité de l'utilisation d'héparine au début de la période postopératoire. OBJECTIFS: Les objectifs principaux étaient de documenter les incidences de cas d'hémorragie importante et de thrombose chez les patients ayant subi une transplantation rénale et ayant reçu des doses thérapeutiques d'héparine, des doses prophylactiques d'héparine ou aucun anticoagulant au début de la période postopératoire ainsi que de comparer les incidences des cas entre les deux derniers groupes. Les objectifs secondaires incluaient la comparaison des facteurs de risque associés à une hémorragie importante et à une thrombose. MÉTHODES: Les patients adultes retenus dans la présente étude de cohorte rétrospective avaient subi une greffe rénale à l'hôpital Saint-Paul entre janvier 2008 et juillet 2013. Des dossiers de santé informatisés et des bases de données ont servi à séparer les patients en trois cohortes selon l'utilisation ou non et la dose d'héparine afin de déceler les cas d'hémorragie importante et de thrombose et afin d'offrir un portrait des patients et des événements. Le test exact de Fisher a été employé pour l'analyse des principaux paramètres alors que l'on a utilisé des statistiques descriptives pour tous les autres paramètres. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 547 patients ont été retenus pour l'analyse. Des hémorragies importantes ont été observées chez 6 (46 %) des 13 patients ayant reçu de l'héparine thérapeutique. Aucune thrombose n'a été relevée chez ces patients. Des hémorragies importantes ont été observées chez 8 (3,0 %) des 266 patients ayant reçu de l'héparine prophylactique et chez 9 (3,4 %) des 268 patients n'ayant pas reçu d'héparine (p > 0,99). Des thromboses ont été observées respectivement chez 1 (0,4 %) et 3 (1,1 %) de ces patients (p = 0,62). Un plus grand nombre de patients ont souffert d'hémorragies importantes avec un protocole à valeurs cibles inférieures pour l'administration d'héparine, mais 61 % des valeurs pour le temps de thromboplastine partielle étaient au-dessus de la cible. Parmi les patients qui ont souffert d'hémorragies importantes et dont le donneur était décédé, une plus grande proportion prenaient des antiplaquettaires. CONCLUSION: L'administration thérapeutique d'héparine a accru les risques d'hémorragie chez les greffés rénaux, mais il n'y a pas eu de cas de thrombose. L'administration prophylactique d'héparine n'a pas augmenté les risques d'hémorragie et elle a permis d'éviter proportionnellement plus de cas de thrombose que l'absence d'anticoagulant; ce résultat vient appuyer l'utilisation d'héparine prophylactique.