Management of oligometastatic/metastatic sarcomas and place of local treatments with focus on modern radiotherapy approaches.

Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous disease. For localized disease, treatment is based on surgery and radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy depending on risk factors. Upfront metastases are present in 7 to 20% of cases, and are localized to the lungs in most of cases. Disseminated disease is generally considered incurable but in selected cases, aggressive local treatment of metastases allowed long survival. Treatment of primary tumour is often debated. Our purpose is to evaluate the literature concerning the role of radiotherapy in the management of primary metastatic soft tissue sarcomas.

Radiotherapy in the management of lung oligometastases.

In recent years, the development of both medical imaging and new systemic agents (targeted therapy and immunotherapy) have revolutionized the field of oncology, leading to a new entity: oligometastatic disease. Adding local treatment of oligometastases to systemic treatment could lead to prolonged survival with no significant impact on quality of life. Given the high prevalence of lung oligometastases and the new systemic agents coming with increased pulmonary toxicity, this article provides a comprehensive review of the current state-of-art for radiotherapy of lung oligometastases. After reviewing pretreatment workup, the authors define several radiotherapy regimen based on the localization and size of the oligometastases. A comment on the synergistic combination of medical treatment and radiotherapy is also made, projecting on future steps in this specific clinical setting.

Radiotherapy in the management of synchronous metastatic lung cancer.

Metastatic lung cancer classically portends a poor prognosis. The management of metastatic lung cancer has dramatically changed with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapy and due to a better understanding of the oligometastatic process. In metastatic lung cancers, radiation therapy which was only used with palliative intent for decades, represents today a promising way to treat primary and oligometastatic sites with a curative intent. Herein we present through a literature review the role of radiotherapy in the management of synchronous metastatic lung cancers.

Intraoperative motive for incomplete resection in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical resection is the current standard of care for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Recent data suggests that up to 5% of patient have incomplete (R2) resection. The exact reason why patients scheduled for surgery with a curative intent to treat ended up with an R2 resection is largely unknown. AIM OF THE STUDY: To identify intraoperative findings responsible for incomplete (R2) resection in primary RPS. METHODS: All records of consecutive patients scheduled for a non-metastatic primary RPS surgery between 1995 and 2020 in a tertiary care sarcoma centre were retrospective analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 347 patients scheduled for surgery, 13 (3.7%) had an incomplete (R2) resection. The reasons for incomplete surgery were intraoperative finding of vascular involvement of great vessels in 5 patients, previously undetected peritoneal metastases in 5 patients, invasion of contralateral kidney/ureter in 2 patients and the need to preserve both kidneys in 1 patient because of his past medical history. Among these patients, 3 had a laparotomy without resection and 10 had a partial resection (i.e. debulking surgery). Severe postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients. The median length of stay in hospital was 19days. After a median follow-up of 12months, the median survival of patients after incomplete resection was 18months. The 1-y, 5-y and 8-y overall survival (OS) for these patients were 46%, 14%, and 7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Incomplete (R2) resection for a primary RPS surgery is rare in specialized sarcoma center. The next steps should be to identify the preoperative criteria that lead to this accurate selection and to define the best practice in front of a peroperative discovery of an unresectable RPS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Histology-tailored multidisciplinary management of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas.

Until recently, the recommendation for primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) was to perform a complete en-bloc gross excision, (neo) adjuvant treatments being options which were not validated by randomized studies, with a large discrepancy of use between centers. The heterogeneity of RPS, with their different biological behaviour, renders a homogenous therapeutic and surgical approach probably inappropriate. Recent studies, both surgical and dedicated to adjuvant treatments, allow refining these recommendations. This review summarizes recent advances and directions.

Final results of the IFCT-0803 study, a phase II study of cetuximab, pemetrexed, cisplatin, and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, stage III, non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Roughly 20% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer exhibit locally advanced, unresectable, stage III disease. Concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy is the backbone treatment, which is followed by maintenance immunotherapy, yet with poor long-term prognosis. This phase II trial (IFCT-0803) sought to evaluate whether adding cetuximab to cisplatin and pemetrexed chemoradiotherapy would improve its efficacy in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients received weekly cetuximab (loading dose 400mg/m2 day 1; subsequent weekly 250mg/m2 doses until two weeks postradiotherapy). Chemotherapy comprised cisplatin (75mg/m2) and pemetrexed (500mg/m2), both delivered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle of maximally four. Irradiation with maximally 66Gy started on day 22. Disease control rate at week 16 was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: One hundred and six patients were included (99 eligible patients). Compliance exceeded 95% for day 1 of chemotherapy cycles 1 to 4, with 76% patients receiving the 12 planned cetuximab doses. Maximal grade 3 toxicity occurred in 63% patients, and maximal grade 4 in 9.6%. The primary endpoint involving the first 95 eligible patients comprised two (2.1%) complete responses, 57 (60.0%) partial responses, and 27 (28.4%) stable diseases. This 90.5% disease control rate (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 84.6%-96.4%) was achieved at week 16. After median 63.0-month follow-up, one-year and two-year survival rates were 75.8% and 59.5%. Median overall survival was 35.8months (95% CI: 23.5-NR), and median progression-free survival 14.4months (95% CI: 11.2-18.8), with one-year and two-year progression-free survival rates of 57.6% and 34.3%. CONCLUSION: These survival rates compare favourably with published data, thus justifying further development of cetuximab-based induction chemoradiotherapy.

Early phase trials in soft-tissue sarcomas: clinical benefit of inclusion in early lines of treatment, molecular screening, and histology-driven trials.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) remains dismal, and systemic therapeutic options are limited. Early phase trials are becoming increasingly safe and effective. This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all STS patients participating in early phase trials at Gustave Roussy and Léon Bérard between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020. RESULTS: Overall, 199 patients accounted for 214 inclusions in advanced STS. The most frequent histotypes were well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcomas (n = 55), leiomyosarcomas (n = 53), synovial sarcomas (n = 22), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (n = 15), angiosarcomas (n = 12), and myxoid liposarcomas (n = 10). The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval 2.7-4.1 months). The median PFS in the first, second, and later lines was 8.3, 5.4, and 2.6 months, respectively (P = 0.00015). The median PFS was 2.8 months in case of molecular screening, 4.1 months in case of histology-driven screening, and 1.6 months (P = 0.00014) in the absence of either screening modalities. In univariate analysis, histotype (P = 0.026), complex genomics (P = 0.008), number of prior lines (P < 0.001), prior anthracyclines (P < 0.001), number of metastatic sites (P = 0.003), liver metastasis (P < 0.001), lung metastasis (P < 0.001), absence of molecular or histology-driven screening (P < 0.001), first-in-human trials (P < 0.001), dose-escalation cohorts (P = 0.011), and Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score >1 (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with shorter PFS. In multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for shorter PFS were myxoid liposarcoma (P = 0.031), ≥2 prior lines of treatment (P = 0.033), liver metastasis (P = 0.007), and RMH score >2 (P = 0.006). Factors associated with improved PFS were leiomyosarcomas (P = 0.010), molecular screening (P = 0.025), and histology-driven screening (P = 0.010). The median overall survival rates were 36.3, 12.6, and 9.2 months in the first, second, and later lines, respectively (P = 0.0067). The grade 3-4 toxicity rate was 36%. CONCLUSIONS: Early phase trials provide an active therapeutic option for STS, even in first-line settings. Molecular screening and histology-driven trials further improve the clinical benefit.

Conformal radiotherapy in management of soft tissue sarcoma in adults.

We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of radiation oncology on soft tissue sarcomas. Currently, the initial management of sarcomas is very important as it may impact on patients' quality of life, especially in limb soft tissue sarcomas, and on overall survival in trunk sarcomas. Radiotherapy has to be discussed within a multidisciplinary board meeting with results of biopsy, eventually reexamined by a dedicated sarcoma pathologist. The role of radiotherapy varies according to localization of soft tissue sarcoma. It is part of the standard treatment in grade 2 and 3 sarcomas of the extremities and superficial trunk>5cm. In case of R1 or R2 resection, reexcision should be discussed. In such cases, it may be delivered preoperatively (50Gy/25 fractions of 2Gy) or postoperatively. In retroperitoneal sarcomas, preoperative conformal radiotherapy with or without modulated intensity cannot be proposed systematically in daily practice. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy cannot be considered a standard treatment. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy has become widely available. Other soft tissue sarcoma sites such as trunk, head and neck and gynaecological soft tissue sarcomas will be addressed, as well as other techniques that may be used such as brachytherapy and proton therapy.

Consolidation nivolumab and ipilimumab versus observation in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer after chemo-radiotherapy - results from the randomised phase II ETOP/IFCT 4-12 STIMULI trial.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is the standard treatment in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC), with 5-year overall survival (OS) of only 25% to 33%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: STIMULI is a 1:1 randomised phase II trial aiming to demonstrate superiority of consolidation combination immunotherapy versus observation after chemo-radiotherapy plus PCI (protocol amendment-1). Consolidation immunotherapy consisted of four cycles of nivolumab [1 mg/kg, every three weeks (Q3W)] plus ipilimumab (3 mg/kg, Q3W), followed by nivolumab monotherapy (240 mg, Q2W) for up to 12 months. Patient recruitment closed prematurely due to slow accrual and the statistical analyses plan was updated to address progression-free survival (PFS) as the only primary endpoint. RESULTS: Of the 222 patients enrolled, 153 were randomised (78: experimental; 75: observation). Among the randomised patients, median age was 62 years, 60% males, 34%/65% current/former smokers, 31%/66% performance status (PS) 0/1. Up to 25 May 2020 (median follow-up 22.4 months), 40 PFS events were observed in the experimental arm, with median PFS 10.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.0-not estimable (NE)] versus 42 events and median 14.5 months (8.2-NE) in the observation, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02 (0.66-1.58), two-sided P = 0.93. With updated follow-up (03 June 2021; median: 35 months), median OS was not reached in the experimental arm, while it was 32.1 months (26.1-NE) in observation, with HR = 0.95 (0.59-1.52), P = 0.82. In the experimental arm, median time-to-treatment-discontinuation was only 1.7 months. CTCAE v4 grade ≥3 adverse events were experienced by 62% of patients in the experimental and 25% in the observation arm, with 4 and 1 fatal, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The STIMULI trial did not meet its primary endpoint of improving PFS with nivolumab-ipilimumab consolidation after chemo-radiotherapy in LD-SCLC. A short period on active treatment related to toxicity and treatment discontinuation likely affected the efficacy results.

Radiotherapy for primary lung cancer.

Herein are presented the recommendations from the Société française de radiothérapie oncologique regarding indications and modalities of lung cancer radiotherapy. The recommendations for delineation of the target volumes and organs at risk are detailed.

[Rôle of radiotherapy for sarcomas]. / Place de la radiothérapie dans la prise en charge des sarcomes.

The quality of the initial management of sarcomas is fundamental because it conditions the patient's quality of life and his overall survival. Radiotherapy should be discussed in a multidisciplinary consultation meeting within the framework of the Netsarc+network. The place of radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue or bone sarcoma depends on the histology and tumour location, knowing that it is most often associated with surgery which remains the main treatment. It is part of the standard treatment for grade II and III deep limb sarcomas of 5cm or greater in size and Ewing's sarcomas. In these indications, conformal radiotherapy with modulation of intensity is used routinely, in combination with IGRT. In other locations, such as retroperitoneal sarcomas or uterine sarcomas, radiotherapy is not a standard of care and must be discussed according to the prognostic criteria related to the patient, the tumour, and the previously received treatments. New techniques, such as proton therapy, hadron therapy (carbon ions) are techniques particularly suited to bone sarcomas considered to be radioresistant. However, large prospective trials are lacking in these rare indications, explaining the lack of recommendations of a high level of evidence.

[Radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients]. / Place de la radiothérapie dans la prise en charge des patients atteints d'un cancer bronchique non à petites cellules oligométastatique.

The oligometastatic disease concept suggests that patients with a limited number of metastases have a favorable prognosis. Radical local treatment of oligometastatic patients has then increased given developments in imaging (mainly positron emission tomography and brain magnetic resonance imaging) and access to effective and better tolerated treatments. Stereotactic radiotherapy has the advantage of being noninvasive, allowing a good rate of local control and a limited number of side effects. A better definition of oligometastatic disease, particularly for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), has recently been published. For patients with NSCLC, two randomized phase II trials also suggested that the addition of a radical local treatment results in encouraging survival data, with a good safety profile. A single-arm phase II finally showed a benefit when combining a radical local treatment with an anti-PD1 immunotherapy. This review describes the definitions of oligometastatic disease, the main prospective findings including radiation therapy, and prospects for oligometastatic NSCLC patients.

Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for the treatment of oligometastatic lung disease.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare efficacy and tolerance between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgery for the treatment of oligometastatic lung disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed patients treated in two institutions for up to 5 pulmonary metastases with a maximal diameter of 4cm and without associated pleural involvement or thoracic lymphadenopathy. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment outcome, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Efficacy endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and pulmonary or local tumor progression rates. RESULTS: Among 204 patients identified, 78 patients (42 men, 36 women; mean age, 53.3±14.9 [SD]; age range: 15-81 years) were treated surgically, while 126 patients (59 men, 67 women; mean age, 62.2±10.8 [SD]; age range: 33-80 years) were treated by RFA. In the RFA cohort, patients were significantly older (P<0.0001), with more extra-thoracic localisation (P=0.015) and bilateral tumour burden (P=0.0014). In comparison between surgery and RFA cohorts, respectively, the 1- and 3-year OS were 94.8 and 67.2% vs. 94 and 72.1% (P=0.46), the 1- and 3-year PFS were 49.4% and 26.1% vs. 38.9% and 14.8% (P=0.12), the pulmonary progression rates were 39.1% and 56% vs. 41.2% and 65.3% (P>0.99), and the local tumour progression rates were 5.4% and 10.6% vs. 4.8% and 18.6% (P=0.07). Tumour size>2cm was associated with a significantly higher local tumor progression in the RFA group (P=0.010). Hospitalisation stay was significantly shorter in the RFA group (median of 3 days; IQR=2 days; range: 2-12 days) than in the surgery group (median of 9 days; IQR=2 days; range: 6-21 days) (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: RFA should be considered a minimally-invasive alternative with similar OS and PFS to surgery in the treatment of solitary or multiple lung metastases measuring less than 4cm in diameter without associated pleural involvement or thoracic lymphadenopathy.

Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas.

Sarcomas are rare tumours arising from mesenchymal tissue. A multimodal management in an expert centre combining surgery and radiotherapy is the current standard of care for localized soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities, to enable limb-sparing strategies. The delivery of pre- radiotherapy or postoperative radiotherapy offers similar local control and survival rates but the toxicity profile is quite different: preoperative radiotherapy increases the risk of wound complications and postoperative radiotherapy affects long-term functional outcomes. While postoperative radiotherapy has long been the rule, especially in Europe, technical improvements with image-guided- and intensity-modulated radiotherapy associated with a better management of postoperative wounds has tended to change practices with more frequent preoperative radiotherapy. More recently the possibilities of a hypofractionated regimen or potentiation by nanoparticles to increase the therapeutic index plead in favour of a preoperative delivery of radiotherapy. The aim of this paper is to report pros and cons of pre- and post-operative radiotherapy for soft-tissue sarcomas.

Treatment of brain metastases in small cell lung cancer: Decision-making amongst a multidisciplinary panel of European experts.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BM) are common in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In recent years, the role of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases in lung cancer is being reevaluated, especially in the context of new systemic treatments available for SCLC. With this analysis, we investigate decision-making in SCLC patients with BM among European experts in medical oncology and radiation oncology. METHODS: We analyzed decision-making from 13 medical oncologists (selected by IASLC) and 13 radiation oncologists (selected by ESTRO) specialized in SCLC. Management strategies of individual experts were converted into decision trees and analyzed for consensus. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic patients, chemotherapy alone is the most commonly recommended first line treatment. In asymptomatic patients with limited volume of brain metastases, a higher preference for chemotherapy without WBRT among medical oncologists compared to radiation oncologists was observed. For symptomatic patients, WBRT followed by chemotherapy was recommended most commonly. For limited extent of BM in symptomatic patients, some experts chose stereotactic radiotherapy as an alternative to WBRT. Significant variation in clinical decision-making was observed among European SCLC experts for the first line treatment of patients with SCLC and BM.

[Role of immunotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer]. / Place de l'immunothérapie dans le cancer bronchique non à petites cellules localement avancé.

Concomitant radiochemotherapy has been the standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), irrespective of histological sub-type or molecular characteristics. Currently, only 15-30 % of patients are alive five years after radiochemotherapy, and this figure remains largely unchanged despite multiple phase III randomised trials. In recent years, immune-checkpoint blockades with anti-PD-(L)1 have revolutionised the care of metastatic NSCLC, becoming the standard front- and second-line strategy. Several preclinical studies reported an increased tumour antigen release, improved antigen presentation, and T-cell infiltration in irradiated tumours. Immunotherapy has therefore recently been evaluated for patients with locally advanced stage III NSCLC. Following the PACIFIC trial, the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab antibody has emerged as a new standard consolidative treatment for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC whose disease has not progressed following concomitant platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. Immunoradiotherapy therefore appears to be a promising association in patients with localised NSCLC. Many trials are currently evaluating the value of concomitant immunotherapy and chemoradiotherapy and/or consolidative chemotherapy with immunotherapy in patients with locally advanced unresectable NSCLC.

[Lung cancer and elective nodal irradiation: A solved issue?] / Cancer du poumon et irradiation ganglionnaire prophylactique : un débat clos ?

Lung cancer treatment is a heavy workload for radiation oncologist and that field showed many evolutions over the last two decades. The issue about target volume was raised when treatment delivery became more precise with the development of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Initially based upon surgical series, numerous retrospective and prospective studies aimed to evaluate the risk of elective nodal failure of involved-field radiotherapy compared to standard large field elective nodal irradiation. In every setting, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, localized non-small cell lung cancer, localized small cell lung cancer, exclusive chemoradiation or postoperative radiotherapy, most of the studies showed no significant difference between involved-field radiotherapy or elective nodal irradiation with elective nodal failure rate under 5% at 2 years, provided staging had been done with modern imaging and diagnostic techniques (positron emission tomography scan, endoscopy, etc.). Moreover, if reducing irradiated volumes are safe regarding recurrences, involved-field radiotherapy allowed dose escalation while reducing acute and late oesophageal, cardiac and pulmonary toxicities. Consequently, major clinical trials involving radiotherapy initiated in the last two decades and international clinical guidelines recommended omission of elective nodal irradiation in favour of in-field radiotherapy.

Surgery in reference centers improves survival of sarcoma patients: a nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 sarcoma reference centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTB) aiming to improve the outcome of sarcoma patients. Since 2010, presentation to an MDTB and expert pathological review are mandatory for sarcoma patients nationwide. In the present work, the impact of surgery in a reference center on the survival of sarcoma patients investigated using this national NETSARC registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients' characteristics and follow-up are prospectively collected and data monitored. Descriptive, uni- and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors were conducted in the entire series (N = 35 784) and in the subgroup of incident patient population (N = 29 497). RESULTS: Among the 35 784 patients, 155 different histological subtypes were reported. 4310 (11.6%) patients were metastatic at diagnosis. Previous cancer, previous radiotherapy, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and Li-Fraumeni syndrome were reported in 12.5%, 3.6%, 0.7%, and 0.1% of patients respectively. Among the 29 497 incident patients, 25 851 (87.6%) patients had surgical removal of the sarcoma, including 9949 (33.7%) operated in a NETSARC center. Location, grade, age, size, depth, histotypes, gender, NF1, and surgery outside a NETSARC center all correlated to overall survival (OS), local relapse free survival (LRFS), and event-free survival (EFS) in the incident patient population. NF1 history was one of the strongest adverse prognostic factors for LRFS, EFS, and OS. Presentation to an MDTB was associated with an improved LRFS and EFS, but was an adverse prognostic factor for OS if surgery was not carried out in a reference center. In multivariate analysis, surgery in a NETSARC center was positively correlated with LRFS, EFS, and OS [P < 0.001 for all, with a hazard ratio of 0.681 (95% CI 0.618-0.749) for OS]. CONCLUSION: This nationwide registry of sarcoma patients shows that surgical treatment in a reference center reduces the risk of relapse and death.