Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Cancer Treat Res Commun ; 35: 100683, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36716534

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have been recently developed and introduced into clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with confirmed HR+/HER2 metastatic breast cancer treated with hormonal therapy in combination with ribociclib (R), palbociclib (P), or abemaciclib (A). OUTCOMES: median progression-free survival (mPFS), time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD), and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Between January 2016 - June 2021, 142 patients were treated with an CDK4/6i (79 P, 42 R, 21 A). The median age was 59 years and 67.6% had recurrent disease. Roughly 35.2%, 36.6%, 28.2% of the patients had 1, 2 or 3+ metastatic sites, respectively, and 55.6% of the patients received CDK4/6i as a first-line treatment. The mPFS was 28m(R) vs. 14m(P) vs. 6m(A) (P = 0.002), with a higher proportion of patients receiving R in the first-line setting. However, no difference was seen when the analysis was restricted to the first-line scenario (P = 0.193). Sixty-four patients required one dose reduction, and 19 patients required two. ORR was 76.2% (R) vs 62% (P) vs 42.9% (A). More patients achieved a complete response with R and P, with no difference in the incidence of partial response and stable disease. Adverse events occurred in 94.4% of the population, with the most common grade 3-4 AE being neutropenia (59.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the efficacy and tolerability of CDK4/6i in routine clinical practice. This is the first real-world data describing and comparing the efficacy and toxicity of CDK4/6i in the Brazilian population.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Brazil , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/antagonists & inhibitors , Progression-Free Survival , Retrospective Studies
2.
Oncologist ; 27(5): 344-351, 2022 05 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35348756

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer outcomes among patients who use safety-net hospitals in the highly populated Harris County, Texas and Southeast Brazil are poor. It is unknown whether treatment delay contributes to these outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer diagnosed between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011 at Harris Health Texas and Unicamp's Women's Hospital, Barretos Hospital, and Brazilian National Institute of Cancer, Brazil. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate association of time to treatment and risk of recurrence (ROR) or death. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred ninety-one patients were included. Women in Brazil were more frequently diagnosed with stage III disease (32.3% vs. 21.1% Texas; P = .002). Majority of patients in both populations had symptom-detected disease (63% in Brazil vs. 59% in Texas). Recurrence within 5 years from diagnosis was similar 21% versus 23%. Median time from diagnosis to first treatment defined as either systemic therapy (chemotherapy or endocrine therapy) or surgery, were comparable, 9.9 weeks versus 9.4 weeks. Treatment delay was not associated with increased ROR or death. Higher stage at diagnosis was associated with both increased ROR and death. CONCLUSION: Time from symptoms to treatment was considerably long in both populations. Treatment delay did not affect outcomes. IMPACT: Access to timely screening and diagnosis of breast cancer are priorities in these populations.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Brazil/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Mass Screening , Retrospective Studies , Time-to-Treatment
3.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet ; 40(7): 403-409, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29991088

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Metastases are rare in early breast cancer (EBC), and international guidelines recommend against routine systemic staging for asymptomatic patients. However, imaging exams remain widely employed in the clinical practice. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the value of imaging for systemic staging in EBC. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of newly-diagnosed breast cancer (BC) patients was performed. Clinical data including BC subtype, stage, presence of symptoms at diagnosis and instrumental procedures performed for staging were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 753 patients were included, with a median age of 57 years. The majority of the patients underwent at least 1 imaging procedure (91%); had invasive ductal carcinoma (83.5%); histological grade 2 (51.4%); stage II (61.8%); and luminal subtype (67.9%). Among the 685 (91%) patients who underwent any radiologic staging, distant metastases (DMs) were detected in 32 (4.7%). In the univariate analyses, stage IIb and pathological lymph node involvement (pN1) showed a statistically significant association with the presence of DMs, versus only a trend for triple negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) positive subtype. In an exploratory analysis performed in this same subgroup, when unfavorable biology (triple negative or Her2 positive) was present, patients had a DM rate of 14.4%, one of the highest reported at this stage of the disease. CONCLUSION: Early breast cancer has a low prevalence of DM at the initial evaluation, and systemic staging of asymptomatic, unselected patients is not warranted as a routine practice. However, we have identified subgroups of patients to whom a full staging could be indicated.


OBJETIVO: Metástases são de ocorrência rara no câncer de mama precoce, e as diretrizes internacionais não recomendam o estadiamento sistêmico de rotina para pacientes assintomáticos. Apesar disso, exames de imagem continuam sendo largamente empregados na prática clínica. O objetivo do presente estudo é avaliar o valor do estadiamento por imagem no câncer de mama precoce. MéTODOS: Análise retrospectiva de pacientes recém-diagnosticados com câncer de mama. Foram registrados os dados clínicos dos pacientes, incluindo subtipo da neoplasia de mama, estadiamento, presença de sintomas no momento do diagnóstico e procedimentos de estadiamento. RESULTADOS: Um total de 753 pacientes foram incluídos, com idade média de 57 anos. Grande parte deles se submeteu a pelo menos um exame de imagem (91%); tinha carcinoma ductal invasivo (83,5%); grau histológico 2 (51,4%); estádio II (61,8%); e subtipo luminal (67,9%). Entre os 685 (91%) pacientes que realizaram algum exame de imagem, metástases à distância foram detectadas em 32 (4,7%). Na análise univariada, estádio IIb e acometimento linfonodal (pN1) tiveram uma associação estatisticamente significativa com a presença de metástase, enquanto os subtipos triplo negativo e receptor tipo 2 do fator de crescimento epidérmico humano (Her2) positivo demonstraram apenas uma tendência para a identificação de metástases. Na análise exploratória deste mesmo subgrupo, diante da presença de biologia desfavorável (triplo negativo e Her2 positivo), os pacientes apresentaram uma taxa de metástase à distância de 14,4%, uma das mais altas relatadas nesse estádio. CONCLUSãO: Neoplasia de mama precoce apresenta baixa baixa prevalência de metástase à distância no momento do diagnóstico, e o estadiamento sistêmico de rotina de pacientes assintomáticos e não selecionados não é justificável. Contudo, identificamos subgrupos de pacientes para os quais o estadiamento completo poderia ser indicado.


Subject(s)
Asymptomatic Diseases , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies
5.
An. bras. dermatol ; 92(6): 830-835, Nov.-Dec. 2017.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-887132

ABSTRACT

Abstract: The stimulation of the immune system, in order to generate an attack against cancer cells, similarly to that which occurs in infectious disease, has long been matter of interest in oncology; however, only limited success has been achieved, with different treatment strategies tested in recent years. The development of new immune checkpoint inhibitors is currently changing this scenario, and immunotherapy is becoming a real choice among traditional cytotoxic treatments to fight cancer. Recent reports have shown efficacy and safety with the use of pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab for the treatment of different neoplasms, especially melanoma. In this article, we propose a review of the mechanisms of action involved in cancer immunology, the response evaluation of immunotherapies, and its toxicity profile, as well as a summary of the main clinical trials that led to the adoption of these new drugs for melanoma treatment.


Subject(s)
Humans , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/methods , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/drug therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Treatment Outcome , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
6.
An Bras Dermatol ; 92(6): 830-835, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29364441

ABSTRACT

The stimulation of the immune system, in order to generate an attack against cancer cells, similarly to that which occurs in infectious disease, has long been matter of interest in oncology; however, only limited success has been achieved, with different treatment strategies tested in recent years. The development of new immune checkpoint inhibitors is currently changing this scenario, and immunotherapy is becoming a real choice among traditional cytotoxic treatments to fight cancer. Recent reports have shown efficacy and safety with the use of pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab for the treatment of different neoplasms, especially melanoma. In this article, we propose a review of the mechanisms of action involved in cancer immunology, the response evaluation of immunotherapies, and its toxicity profile, as well as a summary of the main clinical trials that led to the adoption of these new drugs for melanoma treatment.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/methods , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/immunology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Humans , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Nivolumab , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Med Case Rep ; 10: 60, 2016 Mar 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26971567

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uterine carcinosarcoma is well known for its aggressive behavior. There is little evidence regarding the gold standard combination chemotherapy in metastatic or locally advanced carcinosarcoma, due to poor survival outcomes obtained with conventional scheduled chemotherapy. This case report represents the first-ever reported objective response to a metronomic chemotherapy regimen and adds to the current literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a case of a Caucasian woman diagnosed with metastatic carcinosarcoma that had already been treated with multiple lines of conventional chemotherapy, with progressive disease. This patient had a surprising clinical and imaging response when treated with oral metronomic cyclophosphamide. CONCLUSIONS: We reviewed the mechanism of action implicated in metronomic chemotherapy, and correlated it with the biology of disease in carcinosarcoma. This information may add to the current literature, providing important insights to future clinical trials in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Carcinosarcoma/drug therapy , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal/drug therapy , Uterine Neoplasms/drug therapy , Administration, Metronomic , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/toxicity , Carcinosarcoma/pathology , Cyclophosphamide/toxicity , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Neoplasms/psychology
8.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 40(6): 835-841, Nov-Dec/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-735985

ABSTRACT

Purpose To assess the activity, safety and treatment patterns of sunitinib in patients with poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the charts of poor risk patients treated with sunitinib from October 2006 to July 2013 who met the eligibility criteria. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Tumor radiological response was measured according to RECIST 1.1 and adverse events (AEs) were assessed through standard criteria. Results Median OS was 8.16 months (95% CI, 5.73-10.59). Of the 53 patients included in this analysis, 9 (17.0%) achieved partial response, 12 (22.6%) had stable disease. Median treatment duration was 3.30 months (95% CI: 1.96-4.63) and 26.4% of patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 39.6% of patients, the most common being fatigue (15.1%), neutropenia (9.5%), nausea, vomiting and diarrhea (7.5% each). Discussion Sunitinib may benefit some unselected poor-risk patients, although the rates of AEs and drug discontinuation suggest a need for careful patient monitoring. .


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Indoles/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyrroles/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
Int Braz J Urol ; 40(6): 835-41, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25615253

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the activity, safety and treatment patterns of sunitinib in patients with poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of poor risk patients treated with sunitinib from October 2006 to July 2013 who met the eligibility criteria. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Tumor radiological response was measured according to RECIST 1.1 and adverse events (AEs) were assessed through standard criteria. RESULTS: Median OS was 8.16 months (95% CI, 5.73-10.59). Of the 53 patients included in this analysis, 9 (17.0%) achieved partial response, 12 (22.6%) had stable disease. Median treatment duration was 3.30 months (95% CI: 1.96-4.63) and 26.4% of patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 39.6% of patients, the most common being fatigue (15.1%), neutropenia (9.5%), nausea, vomiting and diarrhea (7.5% each). DISCUSSION: Sunitinib may benefit some unselected poor-risk patients, although the rates of AEs and drug discontinuation suggest a need for careful patient monitoring.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Indoles/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyrroles/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sunitinib , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL