Association Between the Dialysate Bicarbonate and the Pre-dialysis Serum Bicarbonate Concentration in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: It is unclear whether the use of higher dialysate bicarbonate concentrations is associated with clinically relevant changes in the pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration. Objective: The objective is to examine the association between the dialysate bicarbonate prescription and the pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting: The study was performed using linked administrative health care databases in Ontario, Canada. Patients: Prevalent adults receiving maintenance in-center hemodialysis as of April 1, 2020 (n = 5414) were included. Measurements: Patients were grouped into the following dialysate bicarbonate categories at the dialysis center-level: individualized (adjustment based on pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration) or standardized (>90% of patients received the same dialysate bicarbonate concentration). The standardized category was stratified by concentration: 35, 36 to 37, and ≥38 mmol/L. The primary outcome was the mean outpatient pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration at the patient level. Methods: We examined the association between dialysate bicarbonate category and pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate using an adjusted linear mixed model. Results: All dialysate bicarbonate categories had a mean pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration within the normal range. In the individualized category, 91% achieved a pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate ≥22 mmol/L, compared to 87% in the standardized category. Patients in the standardized category tended to have a serum bicarbonate that was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.93, 0.43) mmol/L lower than patients in the individualized category. Relative to patients in the 35 mmol/L category, patients in the 36 to 37 and ≥38 mmol/L categories tended to have a serum bicarbonate that was 0.70 (95% CI = -0.30, 1.70) mmol/L and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.14, 1.60) mmol/L higher, respectively. There was no effect modification by age, sex, or history of chronic lung disease. Limitations: We could not directly confirm that all laboratory measurements were pre-dialysis. Data on prescribed dialysate bicarbonate concentrations for individual dialysis sessions were not available, which may have led to some misclassification, and adherence to a practice of individualization could not be measured. Residual confounding is possible. Conclusions: We found no significant difference in the pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration irrespective of whether an individualized or standardized dialysate bicarbonate was used. Dialysate bicarbonate concentrations ≥38 mmol/L (vs 35 mmol/L) may increase the pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate concentration by 0.9 mmol/L.

Contexte: On ignore si des concentrations plus élevées de bicarbonate dans le dialysat sont associées à des changements cliniquement significatifs dans le taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse. Objectif: Examiner l'association entre la prescription de bicarbonate du dialysat et le taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse. Conception: Étude de cohorte rétrospective. Cadre: Étude réalisée en Ontario (Canada) à partir des données administratives de santé. Sujets: Ont été inclus les adultes prévalents qui recevaient une hémodialyse chronique en centre le 1er avril 2020 (n=5 414). Mesures: Les sujets ont été regroupés dans les catégories suivantes de concentration en bicarbonate dans le dialysat utilisée dans leur unité de dialyse: individualisée (ajustée selon le taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse) ou normalisée (même concentration pour >90% des sujets). La catégorie « standardisée ¼ a été stratifiée selon la concentration: 35 mmol/L, 36 à 37 mmol/L et ≥38 mmol/L. Le principal critère d'évaluation était le taux moyen de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse en ambulatoire au niveau du patient. Méthodologie: Nous avons examiné l'association entre la catégorie de concentration en bicarbonate du dialysat et le taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse à l'aide d'un modèle linéaire mixte corrigé. Résultats: Pour toutes les catégories de concentration en bicarbonate du dialysat, le taux moyen de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse était dans la plage normale. Dans la catégorie « individualisée ¼, 91% des sujets avaient un taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse de ≥22 mmol/L, comparativement à 87% dans la catégorie « standardisée ¼. Les patients de la catégorie « standardisée ¼ tendaient à avoir un taux de bicarbonate sérique de 0,25 mmol/L (IC 95%: -0,93 à 0,43) inférieur à celui des patients de la catégorie « individualisée ¼. Comparé aux patients de la catégorie 35 mmol/L, les patients des catégories 36 à 37 mmol/L et ≥38 mmol/L tendaient respectivement à avoir un taux de bicarbonate sérique de 0,70 mmol/L (IC 95%: -0,30 à 1,70) et de 0,87 mmol/L (IC 95%: 0,14 à 1,60) plus élevé. L'âge, le sexe ou les antécédents de maladie pulmonaire chronique n'ont pas semblé modifier l'effet. Limites: Il n'a pas été possible de confirmer directement que toutes les mesures de laboratoire avaient été effectuées avant la dialyse. Les données sur les concentrations de bicarbonate prescrites pour les séances de dialyse individuelles n'étaient pas disponibles, ce qui peut avoir conduit à une classification erronée. De plus, l'observance d'une pratique d'individualisation n'a pas pu être mesurée. Une confusion résiduelle est possible. Conclusion: Nous n'avons observé aucune différence significative dans les taux de bicarbonate sériques prédialyse, qu'on ait utilisé une concentration individualisée ou standardisée de bicarbonate dans le dialysat. L'utilisation d'un dialysat à ≥38 mmol/L (c. 35 mmol/L) de bicarbonate peut entraîner une hausse de 0,9 mmol/L du taux de bicarbonate sérique prédialyse.

Emergency Department Use Among Adults Receiving Dialysis.

Importance: People with kidney failure receiving maintenance dialysis visit the emergency department (ED) 3 times per year on average, which is 3- to 8-fold more often than the general population. Little is known about the factors that contribute to potentially preventable ED use in this population. Objective: To identify the clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with potentially preventable ED use among patients receiving maintenance dialysis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used linked administrative health data within the Alberta Kidney Disease Network to identify adults aged 18 years or older receiving maintenance dialysis (ie, hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2019. Patients who had been receiving dialysis for more than 90 days were followed up from cohort entry (defined as dialysis start date plus 90 days) until death, outmigration from the province, receipt of a kidney transplant, or end of study follow-up. The Andersen behavioral model of health services was used as a conceptual framework to identify variables related to health care need, predisposing factors, and enabling factors. Data were analyzed in March 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of all-cause ED encounters and potentially preventable ED use associated with 4 kidney disease-specific ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (hyperkalemia, heart failure, volume overload, and malignant hypertension) were calculated. Multivariable negative binomial regression models were used to examine the association between clinical and sociodemographic factors and rates of potentially preventable ED use. Results: The cohort included 4925 adults (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [15.5] years; 3071 males [62.4%]) with kidney failure receiving maintenance hemodialysis (3183 patients) or peritoneal dialysis (1742 patients) who were followed up for a mean (SD) of 2.5 (2.0) years. In all, 3877 patients had 34 029 all-cause ED encounters (3100 [95% CI, 2996-3206] encounters per 1000 person-years). Of these, 755 patients (19.5%) had 1351 potentially preventable ED encounters (114 [95% CI, 105-124] encounters per 1000 person-years). Compared with patients with a nonpreventable ED encounter, patients with a potentially preventable ED encounter were more likely to be in the lowest income quintile (38.8% vs 30.9%; P < .001); to experience heart failure (46.8% vs 39.9%; P = .001), depression (36.6% vs 32.5%; P = .03), and chronic pain (60.1% vs 54.9%; P = .01); and to have a longer duration of dialysis (3.6 vs 2.6 years; P < .001). In multivariable regression analyses, potentially preventable ED use was higher for younger adults (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.69 [95% CI, 1.33-2.15] for those aged 18 to 44 years) and patients with chronic pain (IRR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.14-1.61]), greater material deprivation (IRR, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.16-2.12]), a history of hyperkalemia (IRR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.09-1.58]), and historically high ED use (ie, ≥3 ED encounters in the prior year; IRR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.23-1.73). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of adults receiving maintenance dialysis in Alberta, Canada, among those with ED use, 1 in 5 had a potentially preventable ED encounter; reasons for such encounters were associated with both psychosocial and medical factors. The findings underscore the need for strategies that address social determinants of health to avert potentially preventable ED use in this population.

Reducing the Frequency of Surveillance Blood Work in Patients Treated With Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Local Quality Improvement Initiative.

Introduction: There is little evidence on the ideal frequency of routine blood work in maintenance dialysis patients to manage complications, including anemia, mineral bone disease (MBD), and hyperkalemia. Recent quality improvement studies from Ontario showed no negative impacts when decreasing the frequency from monthly to every 6 weeks in conventional in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) patients. In December 2020, Alberta Kidney Care-South (AKC-S) reduced the frequency of routine blood work from every 6 weeks to every 8 weeks for ICHD patients. Objective: We aimed to assess the impact of reducing blood work frequency on patient outcomes. Methods: We compared prevalent AKC-S ICHD patients in 2 cohorts: (1) retrospective control (October 31, 2019-October 31, 2020) and (2) prospective intervention (December 1, 2020-December 1, 2021). Primary outcomes were true frequency of routine blood work, odds of patients being within target for anemia and MBD, and proportion of lab values of hyperkalemia. Furthermore, we compared hospitalizations and mortality. Results: A total of 972 patients in Calgary's ICHD program were included, 787 in each period (with 602 patients overlapping both cohorts). The frequency of routine blood work decreased from every 39.5 days in the control period to every 54.2 days in the intervention period (P < .01). There was a reduction in the odds of phosphate values in targets (P = .02), and an increase in the odds of labs with hyperkalemia (>6.0 mmol/L) during the intervention period (P = .01). There was no significant change in the odds of being within the accepted targets during the intervention period compared with the control period for hemoglobin, Tsat, calcium, or parathyroid hormone (PTH). Fewer patients were hospitalized during the intervention period and the risk of death decreased as well, although additional factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic may have affected this. A cost-savings of $32 962 occurred from the reduced anemia and MBD blood work during the intervention period. Conclusions: When ICHD units in Calgary reduced routine blood work frequency from every 6 weeks to 8 weeks, there were no negative impacts on hospitalizations or deaths. A slightly lower proportion of phosphate values were within target, and a 0.7% increase in potassium values greater than 6 mmol/L was demonstrated. Our study suggests that blood work frequency in ICHD dialysis patients may be further reduced to every 8 weeks safely. Ultimately, additional pragmatic trials are needed to identify the optimal frequency of routine blood work.

Introduction: Il existe peu de données quant à la fréquence idéale des analyses sanguines chez les patients sous dialyse d'entretien pour gérer les complications comme l'anémie, les troubles liés à la densité osseuse (TDO) et l'hyperkaliémie. De récentes études d'amélioration de la qualité menées en Ontario n'ont montré aucune conséquence négative lorsque la fréquence des analyses des patients traités de façon traditionnelle par hémodialyse en centre (HDC) est passée d'une fois par mois à une fois toutes les 6 semaines. L'Alberta Kidney Care-South (AKC-S) a réduit la fréquence des analyses sanguines de routine; depuis décembre 2020, les analyses des patients traités par HDC sont effectuées toutes les 8 semaines plutôt qu'aux 6 semaines. Objectif: Évaluer les effets d'une réduction de la fréquence des analyses sanguines sur les résultats des patients. Méthodologie: Nous avons comparé des patients de l'AKC-S prévalents pour l'HDC dans deux cohortes: a) période témoin ­ rétrospective (31 octobre 2019 au 31 octobre 2020); b) période d'intervention ­ prospective (1er décembre 2020 au 1er décembre 2021). Les principaux critères d'évaluation étaient la fréquence réelle des analyses sanguines de routine, la probabilité que les patients soient dans la cible pour l'anémie et les TDO, et dans la fourchette cible des valeurs de laboratoire pour l'hyperkaliémie. Les hospitalisations et la mortalité ont également été comparées entre les deux cohortes. Résultats: Au total, 972 patients du programme d'HDC de Calgary ont été inclus, soit deux cohortes de 787 patients (602 patients ont chevauché les deux cohortes). Les analyses sanguines étaient effectuées tous les 39,5 jours pendant la période témoin; cette fréquence est passée aux 54,2 jours pendant la période d'intervention (p<0,01). On a observé une réduction des probabilités que le taux de phosphate soit dans les cibles (p=0,02) et une augmentation des valeurs de laboratoire montrant une hyperkaliémie (>6,0 mmol/L) pendant la période d'intervention (p=0,01). Aucun changement significatif n'a été observé entre les deux périodes en ce qui concerne la probabilité que les valeurs de laboratoire soient dans les cibles acceptées pour l'hémoglobine, le TSAT, le calcium ou la PTH. Pendant la période d'intervention, moins de patients ont été hospitalisés et le risque de décès a diminué, mais d'autres facteurs, notamment la pandémie de COVID-19, ont pu influer sur ce résultat. Enfin, le fait de réduire la fréquence des analyses de suivi pour l'anémie et les TDO a entraîné des économies de 32 962 $. Conclusion: Aucune conséquence négative n'a été observée lorsque la fréquence des analyses sanguines des patients des unités d'hémodialyse en centre de Calgary est passée de 6 à 8 semaines. Une proportion légèrement plus faible des valeurs de phosphate se situait dans la fourchette cible et une augmentation de 0,7 % des valeurs de potassium supérieures à 6 mmol/L a été constatée. Notre étude suggère qu'il est sécuritaire d'effectuer les analyses sanguines des patients hémodialysés en centre toutes les 8 semaines. Des essais pragmatiques sont nécessaires pour déterminer la fréquence optimale de ces analyses.

Global variations in funding and use of hemodialysis accesses: an international report using the ISN Global Kidney Health Atlas.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of contemporary data describing global variations in vascular access for hemodialysis (HD). We used the third iteration of the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) to highlight differences in funding and availability of hemodialysis accesses used for initiating HD across world regions. METHODS: Survey questions were directed at understanding the funding modules for obtaining vascular access and types of accesses used to initiate dialysis. An electronic survey was sent to national and regional key stakeholders affiliated with the ISN between June and September 2022. Countries that participated in the survey were categorized based on World Bank Income Classification (low-, lower-middle, upper-middle, and high-income) and by their regional affiliation with the ISN. RESULTS: Data on types of vascular access were available from 160 countries. Respondents from 35 countries (22% of surveyed countries) reported that > 50% of patients started HD with an arteriovenous fistula or graft (AVF or AVG). These rates were higher in Western Europe (n = 14; 64%), North & East Asia (n = 4; 67%), and among high-income countries (n = 24; 38%). The rates of > 50% of patients starting HD with a tunneled dialysis catheter were highest in North America & Caribbean region (n = 7; 58%) and lowest in South Asia and Newly Independent States and Russia (n = 0 in both regions). Respondents from 50% (n = 9) of low-income countries reported that > 75% of patients started HD using a temporary catheter, with the highest rates in Africa (n = 30; 75%) and Latin America (n = 14; 67%). Funding for the creation of vascular access was often through public funding and free at the point of delivery in high-income countries (n = 42; 67% for AVF/AVG, n = 44; 70% for central venous catheters). In low-income countries, private and out of pocket funding was reported as being more common (n = 8; 40% for AVF/AVG, n = 5; 25% for central venous catheters). CONCLUSIONS: High income countries exhibit variation in the use of AVF/AVG and tunneled catheters. In low-income countries, there is a higher use of temporary dialysis catheters and private funding models for access creation.

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect of an Exercise Rehabilitation Program on Symptom Burden in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Clinical Research Protocol.

Background: People receiving hemodialysis experience high symptom burden that contributes to low functional status and poor health-related quality of life. Management of symptoms is a priority for individuals receiving hemodialysis but limited effective treatments exist. There is emerging evidence that exercise programming can improve several common dialysis-related symptoms. Objective: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of an exercise rehabilitation program on symptom burden in individuals receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Design: Multicenter, randomized controlled, 1:1 parallel, open label, prospective blinded end point trial. Setting: Three facility-based hemodialysis units in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Participants: Adults aged 18 years or older with end-stage kidney disease receiving facility-based maintenance hemodialysis for more than 3 months, with at least 1 dialysis-related symptom as indicated by the Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI) severity score >0 (n = 150). Intervention: Supervised 26-week exercise rehabilitation program and 60 minutes of cycling during hemodialysis thrice weekly. Exercise intensity and duration were supervised and individualized by the kinesiologist as per participant baseline physical function with gradual progression over the course of the intervention. Control: Usual hemodialysis care (no exercise program). Measurements: Our primary outcome is change in symptom burden at 12 weeks as measured by the DSI severity score. Secondary outcomes include change in modified DSI severity score (includes 10 symptoms most plausible to improve with exercise), change in DSI severity score at 26 and 52 weeks; time to recover post-hemodialysis; health-related quality of life measured using EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L; physical activity behavior measured by self-report (Godin-Shepherd questionnaire) and triaxial accelerometry; exercise capacity (shuttle walk test); frailty (Fried); self-efficacy for exercise; and 1-year hospitalization and mortality. Methods: Change in primary outcome will be compared between groups by independent 2-tailed t test or Mann-Whitney U test depending on data distribution and using generalized linear mixed models, with study time point as a random effect and adjusted for baseline DSI score. Similarly, change in secondary outcomes will be compared between groups over time using appropriate parametric and nonparametric statistical tests depending on data type and distribution. Limitations: The COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on clinical research at our institution delayed completion of target recruitment and prevented collection of accelerometry and physical function outcome data for 15 months until restrictions were lifted. Conclusions: The application of an exercise rehabilitation program to improve symptom burden in individuals on hemodialysis may ameliorate common symptoms observed in individuals on hemodialysis and result in improved quality of life and reduced disability and morbidity over the long term. Importantly, this pragmatic study, with a standardized exercise intervention that is adaptable to baseline physical function, addresses an important gap in both clinical care of hemodialysis patients and our current knowledge.

Contexte: Les personnes sous hémodialyse éprouvent un grand nombre de symptômes qui contribuent à un faible état fonctionnel et à une mauvaise qualité de vie liée à la santé. La prise en charge des symptômes est une priorité pour les personnes sous hémodialyse, mais les traitements efficaces sont limités. De nouvelles preuves montrent que l'adoption d'un programme d'exercice permettrait d'améliorer plusieurs symptômes courants liés à la dialyse. Objectifs: Le principal objectif de cette étude est d'évaluer l'effet d'un programme de rééducation par l'exercice sur le fardeau des symptômes chez les personnes recevant une hémodialyse d'entretien. Conception: Essai clinique prospectif randomisé-contrôlé, en aveugle, en parallèle 1:1 et ouvert, multicentrique. Cadre: Trois unités d'hémodialyse de Winnipeg, au Manitoba (Canada). Sujets: Des adultes atteints d'insuffisance rénale terminale qui reçoivent des traitements d'hémodialyse d'entretien en centre depuis plus de trois mois et qui présentent au moins un symptôme lié à la dialyse, tel qu'indiqué par un score de gravité de l'indice des symptômes de la dialyse (Dialysis Symptom Index) supérieur à zéro (n = 150). Intervention: Programme supervisé de rééducation par l'exercice d'une durée de 26 semaines et 60 minutes de vélo trois fois par semaine pendant l'hémodialyse. L'intensité et la durée de l'exercice ont été supervisées par un kinésiologue qui les a ensuite personnalisées en fonction de la forme physique initiale du participant en prévoyant une progression graduelle tout au long de l'intervention. Groupe témoin: Soins habituels d'hémodialyse (sans programme d'exercice). Mesures: Notre principal critère de jugement est un changement dans le fardeau lié aux symptômes après 12 semaines, tel que mesuré par le score de gravité de l'indice des symptômes de dialyse (ISD). Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprennent un changement du score modifié de gravité de l'ISD (portant sur 10 symptômes les plus plausibles de s'améliorer avec l'exercice), la modification du score de gravité de l'ISD après 26 et 52 semaines, le temps de récupération après l'hémodialyse, la qualité de vie liée à la santé mesurée par le questionnaire EQ5D-5L, le comportement lié à l'activité physique mesuré par autoévaluation (questionnaire Godin-Shepherd) et par accéléromètre triaxial, la capacité d'effort (test de marche navette), la fragilité (Fried), le sentiment d'efficacité autodéclaré face à l'exercice, ainsi que les hospitalisations et la mortalité à un an. Méthodologie: Les changements pour le principal critère de jugement seront comparés entre les groupes par un test t bilatéral indépendant ou un test U de Mann-Whitney en fonction de la distribution des données, ainsi qu'à l'aide de modèles linéaires mixtes généralisés avec un point temporel de l'étude comme effet aléatoire et corrigé en fonction du score ISD initial. Les changements dans les résultats secondaires seront comparés entre les groupes au fil du temps à l'aide des tests statistiques paramétriques et non paramétriques appropriés selon le type de données et la distribution. Limites: Les restrictions liées à la pandémie de COVID-19 dans notre établissement ont retardé le recrutement des cibles et empêché pendant 15 mois la collecte de données sur les résultats mesurés par l'accéléromètre et les mesures de la fonction physique, soit jusqu'à ce que les restrictions soient levées. Conclusion: L'adoption d'un programme de rééducation par l'exercice visant à réduire le fardeau lié aux symptômes chez les personnes sous hémodialyse peut améliorer les symptômes courants observés dans cette population et se traduire par une amélioration de la qualité de vie et une réduction de l'invalidité et de la morbidité à long terme. Il convient de noter que cet essai pragmatique, avec son intervention d'exercice standardisée adaptable à la condition physique initiale de la personne, comble une lacune importante dans les soins cliniques des patients sous hémodialyse et dans nos connaissances actuelles.

Exercise perceptions and practices of people receiving peritoneal dialysis: An international cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Low physical activity and functional impairment are prevalent and unaddressed in people receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). Exercise has been shown to improve physical function and mental health for people with kidney disease. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive survey aimed at identifying the exercise and physical activity perceptions and practice patterns of people receiving PD. The survey was developed and pretested with persons living with kidney disease, PD clinicians and exercise specialists. RESULTS: There were 108 respondents (people receiving PD) with the majority from Canada (68%) and the United Kingdom (25%). Seventy-one per cent were engaged in physical activity two or more times per week. Most (91.8%) believed that physical activity is beneficial, and 61.7% reported healthcare provider discussion about physical activity. Perceptions regarding weightlifting restrictions varied: 76% were told not to lift weight with a maximum amount ranging from 2 kg to 45 kg. Few (28%) were instructed to drain PD fluid prior to physical activity. Mixed advice regarding swimming ability was common (44% were told they could swim and 44% were told they should not). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge gaps suggest that education for both healthcare providers and patients is needed regarding the practice of exercise for people living with PD. Common areas of confusion include the maximum weight a person should lift, whether exercise was safe with or without intrabdominal PD fluid in situ and whether swimming is allowed. Further research is needed to provide patients with evidence-based recommendations rather than defaulting to restricting activity.

The Association Between Intradialytic Symptom Clusters and Recovery Time in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis: An Exploratory Analysis.

Background: Individuals receiving hemodialysis often experience concurrent symptoms during treatment and frequently report feeling unwell after dialysis. The degree to which intradialytic symptoms are related, and which specific symptoms may impair health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is uncertain. Objectives: To explore intradialytic symptoms clusters, and the relationship between intradialytic symptom clusters with dialysis treatment recovery time and HRQoL. Design/setting: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study of 118 prevalent patients receiving hemodialysis in two centers in Calgary, Alberta and Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Participants: Adults receiving hemodialysis treatment for at least 3 months, not scheduled for a modality change within 6 weeks of study commencement, who could provide informed consent and were able to complete English questionnaires independently or with assistance. Methods: Participants self-reported the presence (1 = none to 5 = very much) of 10 symptoms during each dialysis treatment, the time it took to recover from each treatment, and weekly Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-Item-Short Form (KDQoL-36) assessments. Principal component analysis identified clusters of intradialytic symptoms. Mixed-effects, ordinal and linear regression examined the association between symptom clusters and recovery time (categorized as 0, >0 to 2, >2 to 6, or >6 hours), and the physical component and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) of the KDQoL-36. Results: One hundred sixteen participants completed 901 intradialytic symptom questionnaires. The most common symptom was lack of energy (56% of treatments). Two intradialytic symptom clusters explained 39% of the total variance of available symptom data. The first cluster included bone or joint pain, muscle cramps, muscle soreness, feeling nervous, and lack of energy. The second cluster included nausea/vomiting, diarrhea and chest pain, and headache. The first cluster (median score: -0.56, 25th to 75th percentile: -1.18 to 0.55) was independently associated with longer recovery time (odds ratio [OR] 1.62 per unit difference in score, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-2.12) and decreased PCS (-0.72 per unit difference in score, 95% CI: -1.29 to -0.15) and MCS scores (-0.82 per unit difference in score, 95% CI: -1.48 to -0.16), whereas the second cluster was not (OR 1.24, 95% CI: 0.97-1.58; PCS 0.19, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.83; MCS -0.72, 95% CI: -1.50 to 0.06). Limitations: This was an exploratory analysis of a small data set from 2 centers. Further work is needed to externally validate these findings to confirm intradialytic symptom clusters and the generalizability of our findings. Conclusions: Intradialytic symptoms are correlated. The presence of select intradialytic symptoms may prolong the time it takes for a patient to recover from a dialysis treatment and impair HRQoL.

Contexte: Il arrive fréquemment que les personnes qui reçoivent des traitements d'hémodialyse éprouvent des symptômes concomitants pendant la dialyze et signalent un malaise après le traitement. On en sait toutefois peu sur le degré de corrélation de ce malaise avec les symptômes intradialytiques et sur les symptômes précis qui peuvent altérer la qualité de vie liée à la santé (QVLS). Objectifs: Explorer différents groupes de symptômes intradialytiques et la relation de ceux-ci avec le temps de récupération post-dialyze et la QVLS. Cadre et conception de l'étude: Nous avons procédé à une analyze post-hoc d'une étude de cohorte prospective portant sur 118 patients prévalents recevant une hémodialyse dans deux centers, soit à Calgary (Alberta) et à Hamilton (Ontario) au Canada. Sujets: Des adultes qui recevaient des traitements d'hémodialyse depuis au moins trois mois ­ sans changement de modalité prévu dans les six semaines suivant le début de l'étude ­ qui pouvaient donner leur consentement éclairé et qui étaient en mesure de remplir des questionnaires en anglais de façon autonome ou avec de l'aide. Méthodologie: Pour chaque traitement de dialyze, les participants devaient autoévaluer le degré de présence (de 1 [non présent] à 5 [très présent]) de dix symptômes et le temps nécessaire pour récupérer de chaque traitement, puis remplir des évaluations hebdomadaires à l'aide du questionnaire KDQoL-36. Une analyze des composantes principales a permis de définir des groupes de symptômes intradialytiques. Une régression à effets mixtes, ordinale et linéaire, a servi à examiner l'association entre les groupes de symptômes et le temps de récupération (0 heure; de 0 à 2 heures; de 2 à 6 hures; plus de 6 heures), et les scores des composantes physiques et psychologiques du KDQoL-36. Résultats: Cent seize patients ont rempli un total de 901 questionnaires sur les symptômes intradialytiques. Le symptôme le plus fréquemment déclaré était le manque d'énergie (56 % des traitements). Deux groupes de symptômes intradialytiques ont expliqué 39 % de la variance totale des données disponibles sur les symptômes. Le premier groupe comprenait des douleurs osseuses ou articulaires, des crampes musculaires, des douleurs musculaires, une sensation de nervosité et un manque d'énergie. Le deuxième groupe comprenait des nausées/vomissements, de la diarrhée, des douleurs thoraciques et des maux de tête. Le premier groupe (score médian : ­0,56; du 25e au 75e percentile : ­1, 18 à 0,55) a été indépendamment associé à un temps de récupération plus long (rapport de cotes : 1,62 par unité de différence de score; IC 95 % : 1,23 à 2,12) et à une diminution des scores des composantes physiques (RC : ­0,72; IC 95 % : ­1, 29 à ­0,15) et des scores des composantes psychologiques (RC : ­0,82; IC 95 % : ­1, 48 à ­0,16). Le deuxième groupe n'a pas été associé avec le temps de récupération (RC : 1,24; IC 95 % : 0,97 à 1,58) ni avec le score des composantes physiques (RC : 0,19; IC 95 % : ­0,46 à 0,83) et les scores des composantes psychologiques (RC : ­0,72; IC 95 % : ­1, 50 à 0,06). Limites: Il s'agissait d'une analyze exploratoire d'un petit ensemble de données provenant de deux centers. D'autres études externes sont nécessaires pour valider ces résultats et, ainsi, confirmer nos groupes de symptômes intradialytiques et la généralisabilité de nos résultats. Conclusion: Les symptômes intradialytiques sont corrélés. La présence de certains symptômes intradialytiques peut prolonger le temps de récupération post-dialyze et altérer la qualité de vie des patients.

Nurse Practitioner Care Compared with Primary Care or Nephrologist Care in Early CKD.

BACKGROUND: Early interventions in CKD have been shown to improve health outcomes; however, gaps in access to nephrology care remain common. Nurse practitioners can improve access to care; however, the quality and outcomes of nurse practitioner care for CKD are uncertain. METHODS: In this propensity score-matched cohort study, patients with CKD meeting criteria for nurse practitioner care were matched 1:1 on their propensity scores for ( 1 ) nurse practitioner care versus primary care alone and ( 2 ) nurse practitioner versus nephrologist care. Processes of care were measured within 1 year after cohort entry, and clinical outcomes were measured over 5 years of follow-up and compared between propensity score-matched groups. RESULTS: A total of 961 (99%) patients from the nurse practitioner clinic were matched on their propensity score to 961 (1%) patients receiving primary care only while 969 (100%) patients from the nurse practitioner clinic were matched to 969 (7%) patients receiving nephrologist care. After matching to patients receiving primary care alone, those receiving nurse practitioner care had greater use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blocker (82% versus 79%; absolute differences [ADs] 3.4% [95% confidence interval, 0.0% to 6.9%]) and statins (75% versus 66%; AD 9.7% [5.8% to 13.6%]), fewer prescriptions of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (10% versus 17%; AD -7.2% [-10.4% to -4.2%]), greater eGFR and albuminuria monitoring, and lower rates of all-cause hospitalization (34.1 versus 43.3; rate difference -9.2 [-14.7 to -3.8] per 100 person-years) and all-cause mortality (3.3 versus 6.0; rate difference -2.7 [-3.6 to -1.7] per 100 person-years). When matched to patients receiving nephrologist care, those receiving nurse practitioner care were also more likely to be prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and statins, with no difference in the risks of experiencing adverse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse practitioner care for patients with CKD was associated with better guideline-concordant care than primary care alone or nephrologist care, with clinical outcomes that were better than or equivalent to primary care alone and similar to those with care by nephrologists. PODCAST: This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2023_12_08_CJN0000000000000305.mp3.

Measurement properties of performance-based measures to assess physical function in chronic kidney disease: recommendations from a COSMIN systematic review.

Background: There is wide heterogeneity in physical function tests available for clinical and research use, hindering our ability to synthesize evidence. The aim of this review was to identify and evaluate physical function measures that could be recommended for standardized use in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2022, identifying studies that evaluated a clinimetric property (validity, reliability, measurement error and/or responsiveness) of an objectively measured performance-based physical function outcomes using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) based recommendations. Studies with individuals of all ages and of any stage of CKD were included. Results: In total, 50 studies with 21 315 participants were included. Clinimetric properties were reported for 22 different physical function tests. The short physical performance battery (SPPB), Timed-up-and-go (TUG) test and Sit-to-stand tests (STS-5 and STS-60) had favorable properties to support their use in CKD and should be integrated into routine use. However, the majority of studies were conducted in the hemodialysis population, and very few provided information regarding validity or reliability. Conclusion: The SPPB demonstrated the highest quality of evidence for reliability, measurement error and construct validity amongst transplant, CKD and dialysis patients. This review is an important step towards standardizing a core outcome set of tools to measure physical function in research and clinical settings for the CKD population.

Alignment Among Patient, Caregiver, and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Hemodialysis Vascular Access Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study.

Background: Updates to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access emphasize the "right access, in the right patient, at the right time, for the right reasons." Although this implies a collaborative approach, little is known about how patients, their caregivers, and health care providers engage in vascular access (VA) decision-making. Objective: To explore how the perspectives of patients receiving hemodialysis, their caregivers, and hemodialysis care team align and diverge in relation to VA selection. Design: Qualitative descriptive study. Setting: Five outpatient hemodialysis centers in Calgary, Alberta. Participants: Our purposive sample included 19 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis, 2 caregivers, and 21 health care providers (7 hemodialysis nurses, 6 VA nurses, and 8 nephrologists). Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with consenting participants. Using an inductive thematic analysis approach, we coded transcripts in duplicate and characterized themes addressing our research objective. Results: While participants across roles shared some perspectives related to VA decision-making, we identified areas where views diverged. Areas of alignment included (1) optimizing patient preparedness-acknowledging decisional readiness and timing, and (2) value placed on trusting relationships with the kidney care team-respecting decisional autonomy with guidance. Perspectives diverged in the following aspects: (1) differing VA priorities and preferences-patients' emphasis on minimizing disruptions to normalcy contrasted with providers' preferences for fistulas and optimizing biomedical parameters of dialysis; (2) influence of personal and peer experience-patients preferred pragmatic, experiential knowledge, whereas providers emphasized informational credibility; and (3) endpoints for VA review-reassessment of VA decisions was prompted by access dissatisfaction for patients and a medical imperative to achieve a functioning access for health care providers. Limitations: Participation was limited to individuals comfortable communicating in English and from urban, in-center hemodialysis units. Few informal caregivers of people receiving hemodialysis and younger patients participated in this study. Conclusions: Although patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers share perspectives on important aspects of VA decisions, conflicting priorities and preferences may impact the decisional outcome. Findings highlight opportunities to bridge knowledge and readiness gaps and integrate shared decision-making in the VA selection process.

Contexte: Les mises à jour des lignes directrices de pratiques cliniques en matière d'accès vasculaire de la KDOQI (Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) insistent sur la création « du bon accès, à la bonne personne, au bon moment et pour les bonnes raisons ¼. Ces recommandations sous-entendent une approche collaborative, mais la façon dont les patients, leurs soignants et les prestataires de soins de santé participent à la prise de décision sur l'accès vasculaire (AV) demeure mal connue. Objectif: Explorer les accords et les divergences dans les points de vue des patients sous hémodialyse, leurs soignants et leur équipe de soins relativement à la sélection de l'AV. Conception: Étude qualitative et descriptive. Cadre: Cinq centres d'hémodialyse ambulatoire à Calgary (Alberta). Sujets: Notre échantillon choisi à dessein était composé de 19 patients sous hémodialyse d'entretien, 2 soignants et 21 prestataires de soins de santé (7 infirmières en hémodialyse, 6 infirmières en AV et 8 néphrologues). Méthodologie: Nous avons mené des entrevues semi-structurées auprès des participants consentants. Une approche d'analyse thématique inductive a été employée pour coder les transcriptions en double et caractériser les thèmes répondant à l'objectif de recherche. Résultats: Certains points de vue sur la prise de décision en matière d'AV étaient partagés par tous les participants, mais nous avons identifié quelques domaines de divergence. Les participants s'entendaient sur : 1) l'optimisation de la préparation des patients ­ reconnaître l'état de préparation et le moment de prendre la décision; et 2) la valeur accordée aux relations de confiance avec l'équipe de soins rénaux ­ respecter l'autonomie décisionnelle après conseils. Les points de vue divergeaient sur : 1) les priorités et préférences à l'égard de l'AV ­ l'accent mis par les patients sur la minimisation des perturbations de la vie courante contrastait avec les préférences des prestataires de soins pour les fistules et l'optimisation des paramètres biomédicaux de la dialyse; 2) l'influence de l'expérience personnelle et des pairs ­ les patients préféraient des connaissances pragmatiques et expérientielles, tandis que les prestataires de soins mettaient l'accent sur la crédibilité de l'information; et 3) les critères d'évaluation de l'AV ­ la réévaluation du choix de l'AV est motivée par l'insatisfaction des patients à l'égard de l'accès et, du côté des prestataires de soins, par l'impératif médical de parvenir à un accès fonctionnel. Limites: Seules les personnes fréquentant une unité d'hémodialyse en centre urbain et à l'aise de communiquer en anglais ont pu participer. Les participants comptaient peu de patients plus jeunes et de soignants informels de personnes sous hémodialyse. Conclusion: Bien que les patients, les soignants et les prestataires de soins de santé s'entendent sur certains aspects importants de la décision concernant l'AV, celle-ci pourrait être influencée par des priorités et préférences contradictoires. Nos résultats mettent en évidence des occasions d'intégrer la prise de décision partagée dans le processus de sélection d'un AV et de combler les lacunes dans les connaissances et la préparation des patients.

Health related quality of life during dialysis modality transitions: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Modality transitions represent a period of significant change that can impact health related quality of life (HRQoL). We explored the HRQoL of adults transitioning to new or different dialysis modalities. METHODS: We recruited eligible adults (≥ 18) transitioning to dialysis from pre-dialysis or undertaking a dialysis modality change between July and September 2017. Nineteen participants (9 incident and 10 prevalent dialysis patients) completed the KDQOL-36 survey at time of transition and three months later. Fifteen participants undertook a semi-structured interview at three months. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Four themes and five sub-themes were identified: adapting to new circumstances (tackling change, accepting change), adjusting together, trading off, and challenges of chronicity (the impact of dialysis, living with a complex disease, planning with uncertainty). From the first day of dialysis treatment to the third month on a new dialysis therapy, all five HRQoL domains from the KDQOL-36 (symptoms, effects, burden, overall PCS, and overall MCS) improved in our sample (i.e., those who remained on the modality). CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis transitions negatively impact the HRQoL of people with kidney disease in various ways. Future work should focus on how to best support people during this time.

Advancing Exercise Science for Better Health Outcomes Across the Spectrum of Chronic Kidney Disease.

Despite over 30 years of evidence for improvements in physical function, physical fitness, and health-related quality of life with exercise training in individuals with chronic kidney disease, access to dedicated exercise training programs remains outside the realm of standard of care for most kidney care programs. In this review, we explore possible reasons for this by comparing approaches in other chronic diseases where exercise rehabilitation has become the standard of care, identifying enablers and factors that need to be addressed for continued growth in this area, and discussing knowledge gaps for future research. For exercise rehabilitation to be relevant to all stakeholders and become a sustainable component of kidney care, a focus on the effect of exercise on clinically relevant outcomes that are prioritized by individuals living with kidney disease, use of evidence-based implementation strategies for diverse settings and populations, and approaching exercise as a medical therapy are required.

An International Survey of Peritoneal Dialysis Exercise Practices and Perceptions.

Introduction: Low activity levels and poor physical function are associated with technique failure and mortality in people receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). Adequate levels of physical function are required to maintain independence for people choosing this predominantly home-based therapy. The objective of this study was to identify the exercise-related perceptions and practices of PD clinicians globally. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of PD clinicians from English-, Thai-, Spanish-, and Portuguese-speaking PD-prevalent countries exploring clinicians' perceptions and practices of swimming, activity following PD catheter insertion, lifting, and falls prevention. This study was convened by the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis and Global Renal Exercise Network between July and December 2021. Results: Of 100 of the highest PD-prevalent countries, 85 responded and were represented in the findings. A total of 1125 PD clinicians (448 nephrologists, 558 nephrology nurses, 59 dietitians, and 56 others) responded from 61% high-income, 32% upper middle-income and 7% lower middle-income countries. The majority (n = 1054, 94%) agreed that structured exercise programs would be beneficial for people receiving PD. Most respondents believed people on PD could perform more exercise (n = 907, 81%) and that abdominal strengthening exercises could be safely performed (n = 661, 59%). Compared to clinicians in high-income countries, clinicians from lower middle-income status (odds ratio [OR], 5.57; 1.64 to 18.9) are more likely to promote participation in physical activity. Conclusion: Clinicians know the importance of physical activity in people receiving PD. Exercise counseling and structured exercise plans could be included in the standard care of people receiving PD to maintain independence.

Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians.

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly mandated in kidney care to incorporate patients' perspectives. Objectives: We assessed whether educational support for clinicians using electronic (e)PROs could enhance person-centered care. Design: A process evaluation, using a mixed methods longitudinal comparative concurrent design was undertaken of educational support to clinicians on routine use of ePROs. In two urban home dialysis clinics in Alberta, Canada, patients completed ePROs. At the implementation site, clinicians were provided with ePROs and clinician-oriented education via voluntary workshops. At the non-implementation site, neither were provided. Person-centered care was measured using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care-20 (PACIC-20). Methods: Longitudinal structural equation models (SEMs) compared change in overall PACIC scores. The interpretive description approach, using thematic analysis of qualitative data, further evaluated processes of implementation. Results: Data were collected from questionnaires completed by 543 patients, 4 workshops, 15 focus groups, and 37 interviews. There was no overall difference in person-centered care throughout the study, including after delivery of workshops. The longitudinal SEMs revealed substantial individual-level variability in overall PACIC trajectories. However, there was no improvement at the implementation site and no difference between the sites during both the pre- and post-workshop periods. Similar results were obtained for each PACIC domain. Qualitative analysis provided insights into why there was no substantial difference between sites: (1) clinicians wanted to see kidney symptoms, not quality of life, (2) workshops were tailored to clinicians' educational needs, not patients' needs, and (3) variable use of ePRO data by clinicians. Conclusion: Training clinicians on use of ePROs is complex and likely only part of what is required to enhance person-centered care. Registration: NCT03149328. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03149328.

Association Between the Route of Administration and Formulation of Estrogen Therapy and Hypertension Risk in Postmenopausal Women: A Prospective Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is the leading global cause of cardiovascular disease and premature mortality in women. The effects of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) on blood pressure are uncertain but may be related to route of estrogen administration and formulation of estrogen. We sought to determine the association between route of administration and formulation of estrogen HT and hypertension risk in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Population-based cohort study with women aged ≥45 years who filled ≥2 consecutive prescriptions for estrogen-only HT, identified from linked provincial health administrative data from Alberta, Canada, between 2008 and 2019. The primary outcome, incident hypertension, was identified using standardized International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for hypertension in women using oral HT compared with nonoral HT (transdermal, vaginal, or intramuscular). RESULTS: In total, 112 240 women used an estrogen-only form of HT. Oral estrogen was associated with a higher risk of hypertension compared with both transdermal (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.08-1.20]) and vaginal (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.13-1.25]) estrogens. Conjugated equine estrogen was associated with an increased risk of hypertension compared with estradiol (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.04-1.14]) but not estrone (HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.93-1.10]). Duration of estrogen exposure and cumulative dose of estrogen was positively associated with risk of hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Oral estrogen-only HT use was associated with an increased risk of hypertension in women. In women using estrogen-only HT, nonoral estradiol at the lowest dose and for the shortest time-period is associated with the lowest risk of hypertension.

A Randomized Trial Examining the Impact of Timing of Intradialytic Cycling on Intradialytic Hypotension.

Introduction: Intradialytic cycling is often performed during the first half of hemodialysis because of concerns regarding increased frequency of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) late in hemodialysis. This increases exercise program resource needs and limits utility of intradialytic cycling to treat dialysis-related symptoms. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, crossover trial compared IDH rate when cycling during the first half versus the second half of hemodialysis in 98 adults on maintenance hemodialysis. Group A cycled during the first half of hemodialysis for 2 weeks and subsequently during the second half for 2 weeks. In group B, the cycling schedule was reversed. Blood pressure (BP) was measured every 15 minutes throughout hemodialysis. Primary outcome was IDH rate (systolic BP [SBP] decrease of >20 mm Hg or SBP <90 mm Hg). Secondary outcomes included symptomatic IDH rate and time to recover post hemodialysis. Data were analyzed using negative binomial and gamma distribution mixed regression. Results: Mean age 64.7 (SD 12.0) and 64.7 (SD 14.2) years in group A (n = 52) and group B (n = 46), respectively. Proportions of females were 33% in group A and 43% in group B. Median time on hemodialysis was 4.1 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.5, 6.1]) years in group A and 3.9 years (IQR 2.5, 6.7) in group B. IDH rate per 100 hemodialysis hours (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 34.2 (26.4, 42.0) and 36.0 (28.9, 43.1) during early and late intradialytic cycling, respectively (P = 0.53). Timing of intradialytic cycling was not associated with symptomatic IDH (relative risk [RR]: 1.07 [0.75-1.53]) or time to recover post hemodialysis (odds ratio: 0.99 [0.79-1.23]). Conclusion: We found no association between the rate of overall or symptomatic IDH and the timing of intradialytic cycling in patients enrolled in an intradialytic cycling program. Increased use of cycling late in hemodialysis may optimize intradialytic cycling program resource use and should be studied as a possible treatment for symptoms common in late hemodialysis.

Sex differences in body fluid composition in humans with obstructive sleep apnea before and after CPAP therapy.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in heart and kidney disease, both conditions prone to fluid retention. Nocturnal rostral fluid shift contributes to the pathogenesis of OSA in men more than women, suggesting a potential role for sex differences in body fluid composition in the pathogenesis of OSA, with men having a predisposition to more severe OSA due to an underlying volume expanded state. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) increases intraluminal pressure in the upper airway and mitigates the rostral fluid shift; this, in turn, may prevent fluid redistribution from other parts of the body to the upper airway. We sought to determine the impact of CPAP on sex differences in body fluid composition. Twenty-nine (10 women, 19 men) incident, sodium replete, otherwise healthy participants who were referred with symptomatic OSA (oxygen desaturation index >15/h) were studied pre- and post-CPAP (>4 h/night × 4 weeks) using bioimpedance analysis. Bioimpedance parameters including fat-free mass (FFM, %body mass), total body water (TBW, %FFM), extracellular and intracellular water (ECW and ICW, %TBW), and phase angle (°) were measured and evaluated for sex differences before and after CPAP. Pre-CPAP, despite TBW being similar between sexes (74.6 ± 0.4 vs. 74.3 ± 0.2%FFM, p = 0.14; all values women vs. men), ECW (49.7 ± 0.7 vs. 44.0 ± 0.9%TBW, p < 0.001) was increased, while ICW (49.7 ± 0.5 vs. 55.8 ± 0.9%TBW, p < 0.001) and phase angle (6.7 ± 0.3 vs. 8.0 ± 0.3°, p = 0.005) were reduced in women compared to men. There were no sex differences in response to CPAP (∆TBW -1.0 ± 0.8 vs. 0.7 ± 0.7%FFM, p = 0.14; ∆ECW -0.1 ± 0.8 vs. -0.3 ± 1.0%TBW, p = 0.3; ∆ICW 0.7 ± 0.4 vs. 0.5 ± 1.0%TBW, p = 0.2; ∆Phase Angle 0.2 ± 0.3 vs. 0.0 ± 0.1°, p = 0.7). Women with OSA had baseline parameters favoring volume expansion (increased ECW, reduced phase angle) compared to men. Changes in body fluid composition parameters in response to CPAP did not differ by sex.

Sex differences in COVID-19 symptoms and outcomes in people with kidney failure treated with dialysis: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: People with kidney failure treated with dialysis are at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and severe COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization and death. Though there are well-defined sex differences in outcomes for the general population with COVID-19, we do not know whether this translates into kidney failure populations. We aimed to estimate the differences in COVID-19 symptoms and clinical outcomes between males and females treated with maintenance dialysis. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, we included adults treated with maintenance dialysis in Southern Alberta, Canada that tested positive for COVID-19 between March 2020 and February 2022. We examined the association between sex (dichotomized as male and female) with COVID-19 symptoms including fever, cough, malaise, shortness of breath, muscle joints/aches, nausea and/or vomiting, loss of appetite, diarrhea, headache, sore throat, and loss of smell/taste using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Secondary outcomes included 30-day hospitalization, ICU admission, and death. RESULTS: Of 1,329 cohort participants, 246 (18.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were included in our study, including 95 females (39%). Of 207 participants with symptoms assessed, females had less frequent fever (p = 0.003), and more nausea or vomiting (p = 0.003) compared to males, after correction for multiple testing. Males exhibited no symptoms 25% of the time, compared with 10% of females (p = 0.01, not significant when corrected for multiple testing). We did not identify statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between the sexes, though vaccinated patients had lower odds of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences in COVID-19 symptoms were identified in a cohort of patients treated with maintenance dialysis, which may inform sex-specific screening strategies in dialysis units. Further work is necessary to examine mechanisms for identified sex differences.

Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision Making in Vascular Access Selection: A Qualitative Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Collaborative approaches to vascular access selection are being increasingly encouraged to elicit patients' preferences and priorities where no unequivocally superior choice exists. We explored how patients, their caregivers, and clinicians integrate principles of shared decision making when engaging in vascular access discussions. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative description. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of patients, their caregivers, and clinicians from outpatient hemodialysis programs in Alberta, Canada. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We used a thematic analysis approach to inductively code transcripts and generate themes to capture key concepts related to vascular access shared decision making across participant roles. RESULTS: 42 individuals (19 patients, 2 caregivers, 21 clinicians) participated in this study. Participants identified how access-related decisions follow a series of major decisions about kidney replacement therapy and care goals that influence vascular access preferences and choice. Vascular access shared decision making was strengthened through integration of vascular access selection with dialysis-related decisions and timely, tailored, and balanced exchange of information between patients and their care team. Participants described how opportunities to revisit the vascular access decision before and after dialysis initiation helped prepare patients for their access and encouraged ongoing alignment between patients' care priorities and treatment plans. Where shared decision making was undermined, hemodialysis via a catheter ensued as the most readily available vascular access option. LIMITATIONS: Our study was limited to patients and clinicians from hemodialysis care settings and included few caregiver participants. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that earlier, or upstream, decisions about kidney replacement therapies influence how and when vascular access decisions are made. Repeated vascular access discussions that are integrated with other higher-level decisions are needed to promote vascular access shared decision making and preparedness.

The Association Between Route of Post-menopausal Estrogen Administration and Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Community-Dwelling Women.

Background: Postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Although the route of estrogen administration may play a role in mediating risk, previous studies have not controlled for concomitant progestin use. Objective: To investigate the association between the route of estrogen therapy (oral or non-oral) HT use, without concomitant progestin, and blood pressure and arterial stiffness in postmenopausal women. Methods: Systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP]), arterial stiffness (aortic pulse wave velocity [aPWV] and augmentation index at 75 beats per minute [AIx]) were measured using a validated automated brachial cuff-based oscillometric approach (Mobil-O-Graph) in a community-dwelling sample of 328 women. Results: Fifty-five participants (16.8%) were ever users (current and past use) of estrogen-only HT (oral [n = 16], transdermal [n = 20], vaginal [n = 19]), and 223 were never HT users (control). Ever use of oral estrogen was associated with increased SBP and DBP (Oral: SBP: 137 ± 4 mmHg, DBP: 79 ± 2 mmHg) compared to use of non-oral estrogen (transdermal: SBP: 118 ± 2 mmHg, DBP: 73 ± 1 mmHg; p < 0.01 & p = 0.012, respectively; vaginal: SBP: 123 ± 2 mmHg DBP: 73 ± 2 mmHg; p = 0.02 & p = 0.01, respectively.) and controls (SBP: 124 ± 1 mmHg, DBP: 74 ± 1 mmHg, p = 0.03, p = 0.02, respectively) after adjustment for covariates. aPWV was higher in oral estrogen ever users (9.9 ± 1 m/s) compared to non-oral estrogen (transdermal: 8.6 ± 0.3 m/s, p < 0.01; vaginal: 8.8 ± 0.7 m/s, p = 0.03) and controls (8.9 ± 0.5 m/s, p = 0.03) but these associations were no longer significant after adjustment for covariates. AIx was higher in oral estrogen (29 ± 2 %) compared to non-oral estrogen (transdermal: 16 ± 2 %; vaginal: 22 ± 1.7 %) but this association was no longer significant after adjustment for covariates (p = 0.92 vs. non-oral; p = 0.74 vs. control). Conclusion: Ever use of oral estrogen was associated with increased SBP and DBP compared to non-oral estrogen use and no use. Given the cardiovascular risk associated with both menopause and increased blood pressure, further studies are required exploring the potential benefits of non-oral estrogen in postmenopausal women.