Pre-existing Immunocompromising Conditions and Outcomes of Acute COVID-19 Patients Admitted for Pediatric Intensive Care.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine if pre-existing immunocompromising conditions (ICCs) were associated with the presentation or outcome of patients with acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted for pediatric intensive care. METHODS: Fifty-five hospitals in 30 US states reported cases through the Overcoming COVID-19 public health surveillance registry. Patients <21 years admitted 12 March 2020-30 December 2021 to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) or high-acuity unit for acute COVID-19 were included. RESULTS: Of 1274 patients, 105 (8.2%) had an ICC, including 33 (31.4%) hematologic malignancies, 24 (22.9%) primary immunodeficiencies and disorders of hematopoietic cells, 19 (18.1%) nonmalignant organ failure with solid-organ transplantation, 16 (15.2%) solid tumors, and 13 (12.4%) autoimmune disorders. Patients with ICCs were older, had more underlying renal conditions, and had lower white blood cell and platelet counts than those without ICCs, but had similar clinical disease severity upon admission. In-hospital mortality from COVID-19 was higher (11.4% vs 4.6%, P = .005) and hospitalization was longer (P = .01) in patients with ICCs. New major morbidities upon discharge were not different between those with and without ICC (10.5% vs 13.9%, P = .40). In patients with ICCs, bacterial coinfection was more common in those with life-threatening COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: In this national case series of patients <21 years of age with acute COVID-19 admitted for intensive care, existence of a prior ICCs were associated with worse clinical outcomes. Reassuringly, most patients with ICCs hospitalized in the PICU for severe acute COVID-19 survived and were discharged home without new severe morbidities.

Genomes for Nurses: Understanding and Overcoming Barriers to Nurses Utilizing Genomics.

Background: Genomic testing is an increasingly important technology within pediatric oncology that aids in cancer diagnosis, provides prognostic information, identifies therapeutic targets, and reveals underlying cancer predisposition. However, nurses lack basic knowledge of genomics and have limited self-assurance in using genomic information in their daily practice. This single-institution project was carried out at an academic pediatric cancer hospital in the United States with the aim to explore the barriers to achieving genomics literacy for pediatric oncology nurses. Method: This project assessed barriers to genomic education and preferences for receiving genomics education among pediatric oncology nurses, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. An electronic survey with demographic questions and 15 genetics-focused questions was developed. The final survey instrument consisted of nine sections and was pilot-tested prior to administration. Data were analyzed using a ranking strategy, and five focus groups were conducted to capture more-nuanced information. The focus group sessions lasted 40 min to 1 hour and were recorded and transcribed. Results: Over 50% of respondents were uncomfortable with or felt unprepared to answer questions from patients and/or family members about genomics. This unease ranked as the top barrier to using genomic information in clinical practice. Discussion: These results reveal that most nurses require additional education to facilitate an understanding of genomics. This project lays the foundation to guide the development of a pediatric cancer genomics curriculum, which will enable the incorporation of genomics into nursing practice.

Patient-Centered Quality Measures for Dialysis Care: A Report of a Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation.

Providing high-quality patient-centered care is the central mission of dialysis facilities. Assessing quality and patient-centeredness of dialysis care is necessary for continuous dialysis facility improvement. Based predominantly on readily measured items, current quality measures in dialysis care emphasize biochemical and utilization outcomes, with very few patient-reported items. Additionally, current metrics often do not account for patient preferences and may compromise patient-centered care by limiting the ability of providers to individualize care targets, such as dialysis adequacy, based on patient priorities rather than a fixed numerical target. Developing, implementing, and maintaining a quality program using readily quantifiable data while also allowing for individualization of care targets that emphasize the goals of patients and their care partners provided the motivation for a September 2022 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Workshop on Patient-Centered Quality Measures for Dialysis Care. Workshop participants focused on 4 questions: (1) What are the outcomes that are most important to patients and their care partners? (2) How can social determinants of health be accounted for in quality measures? (3) How can individualized care be effectively addressed in population-level quality programs? (4) What are the optimal means for collecting valid and robust patient-reported outcome data? Workshop participants identified numerous gaps within the current quality system and favored a conceptually broader, but not larger, quality system that stresses highly meaningful and adaptive measures that incorporate patient-centered principles, individual life goals, and social risk factors. Workshop participants also identified a need for new, low-burden tools to assess patient goals and priorities.

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of canakinumab in children and young adults with sickle cell anemia.

Excessive intravascular release of lysed cellular contents from damaged red blood cells (RBCs) in patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA) can activate the inflammasome, a multiprotein oligomer promoting maturation and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß). We hypothesized that IL-1ß blockade by canakinumab in patients with SCA would reduce markers of inflammation and clinical disease activity. In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 2a study, patients aged 8 to 20 years with SCA (HbSS or HbSß0-thalassemia), history of acute pain episodes, and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein >1.0 mg/L at screening were randomized 1:1 to received 6 monthly treatments with 300 mg subcutaneous canakinumab or placebo. Measured outcomes at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 included electronic patient-reported outcomes, hospitalization rate, and adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). All but 1 of the 49 enrolled patients were receiving stable background hydroxyurea therapy. Although the primary objective (prespecified reduction of pain) was not met, compared with patients in the placebo arm, patients treated with canakinumab had reductions in markers of inflammation, occurrence of SCA-related AEs and SAEs, and number and duration of hospitalizations as well as trends for improvement in pain intensity, fatigue, and absences from school or work. Post hoc analysis revealed treatment effects on weight, restricted to pediatric patients. Canakinumab was well tolerated with no treatment-related SAEs and no new safety signal. These findings demonstrate that the inflammation associated with SCA can be reduced by selective IL-1ß blockade by canakinumab with potential for therapeutic benefits. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02961218.

Evaluation of the Absorption, Metabolism, and Excretion of a Single Oral 1-mg Dose of Tropifexor in Healthy Male Subjects and the Concentration Dependence of Tropifexor Metabolism.

Tropifexor (NVP-LJN452) is a highly potent, selective, nonsteroidal, non-bile acid farnesoid X receptor agonist for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Its absorption, metabolism, and excretion were studied after a 1-mg oral dose of [14C]tropifexor was given to four healthy male subjects. Mass balance was achieved with ∼94% of the administered dose recovered in excreta through a 312-hour collection period. Fecal excretion of tropifexor-related radioactivity played a major role (∼65% of the total dose). Tropifexor reached a maximum blood concentration (Cmax) of 33.5 ng/ml with a median time to reach Cmax of 4 hours and was eliminated with a plasma elimination half-life of 13.5 hours. Unchanged tropifexor was the principal drug-related component found in plasma (∼92% of total radioactivity). Two minor oxidative metabolites, M11.6 and M22.4, were observed in circulation. Tropifexor was eliminated predominantly via metabolism with >68% of the dose recovered as metabolites in excreta. Oxidative metabolism appeared to be the major clearance pathway of tropifexor. Metabolites containing multiple oxidative modifications and combined oxidation and glucuronidation were also observed in human excreta. The involvement of direct glucuronidation could not be ruled out based on previous in vitro and nonclinical in vivo studies indicating its contribution to tropifexor clearance. The relative contribution of the oxidation and glucuronidation pathways appeared to be dose-dependent upon further in vitro investigation. Because of these complexities and the instability of glucuronide metabolites in the gastrointestinal tract, the contribution of glucuronidation remained undefined in this study. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Tropifexor was found to be primarily cleared from the human body via oxidative metabolism. In vitro metabolism experiments revealed that the relative contribution of oxidation and glucuronidation was concentration-dependent, with glucuronidation as the predominant pathway at higher concentrations and the oxidative process becoming more important at lower concentrations near clinical exposure range. The body of work demonstrated the importance of carefully designed in vivo and in vitro experiments for better understanding of disposition processes during drug development.

Association of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D With Prevalence, Incidence, and Clearance of Vaginal HPV Infection in Young Women.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and genital human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence, incidence, and clearance among female participants in the HPV Infection and Transmission among Couples through Heterosexual activity (HITCH) Cohort Study. METHODS: We genotyped HPV DNA in vaginal samples and quantified baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels using Roche's Linear Array and Total vitamin D assay, respectively. We used logistic and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively, to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: There was no association between vitamin D levels (every 10-ng/mL increase) at baseline and HPV prevalence (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, .73-1.03) or incidence (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, .73-1.06), but we observed a modest negative association with HPV clearance (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, .60-.96). Vitamin D levels <30 ng/mL, compared with those ≥30 ng/mL, were not associated with HPV prevalence (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, .57-1.69) or incidence (HR, .87; 95% CI, .50-1.43), but they were associated with a marginally significant increased clearance (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, .99-4.64). We observed consistent results with restricted cubic spline modeling of vitamin D levels and clinically defined categories. HPV type-specific analyses accounting for multiple HPV infections per participant showed no association between vitamin D levels and all study outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided no evidence of an association between low vitamin D levels and increased HPV prevalence, acquisition, or clearance.

Effect of Positioning of the Region of Interest on Bone Density of the Hip.

BACKGROUND: Large changes in positioning of the global region of interest (ROI) influence the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) in the hip and forearm regions. However, it is unknown whether minor shifts in the positioning of the bottom of the global hip ROI affect the measurement of total hip BMD. METHODS: The hip BMDs of 40 clinical densitometry patients were analyzed at baseline with the bottom of the global hip ROI positioned as usual, 10 mm distal to the base of the lesser trochanter (position 0). Then the hip was reanalyzed by shifting the bottom of the global hip ROI 1 mm proximally 10 times (positions +1 through +10) and then by shifting the bottom of the global hip ROI 1 mm distally 10 times (positions -1 through -10). The significance of the differences between mean values at the various distances from baseline was assessed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: The mean total hip area, bone mineral content and BMD decreased as the bottom of the global hip ROI was shifted proximally; the decrease was significant when shifted by even 1 mm (p < 0.001). The mean total hip area, bone mineral content and BMD increased as the bottom of the global hip ROI was shifted distally; the increase was significant when shifted by even 1 mm (p < 0.001). The change in BMD with each 1 mm shift was uniform across the range studied from positions +10 through -10, and was approx 0.54%/mm. When the least significant change was based on 40 pairs of measurements, where each pair was comprised of the baseline scan and the same scan at -1 position, the least significant change was 0.01 g/cm2. CONCLUSIONS: The BMD of the total hip is sensitive to even minor changes in the positioning of the bottom of the global hip ROI. Although a 1 mm change in the bottom of the global hip ROI positioning would make little difference in the reported T-score, it could easily affect the determination of significance in changes in BMD over time.

Effect of Positioning of the ROI on BMD of the Forearm and Its Subregions.

Inconsistent positioning of patients and region of interest (ROI) is known to influence the precision of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements in the spine and hip. However, it is unknown whether minor shifts in the positioning of the ROI along the shaft of the radius affect the measurement of forearm BMD and its subregions. The ultradistal (UD-), mid-, one-third, and total radius BMDs of 50 consecutive clinical densitometry patients were acquired. At baseline the distal end of the ROI was placed at the tip of the ulnar styloid as usual, and then the forearm was reanalyzed 10 more times, each time shifting the ROI 1 mm proximally. No corrections for multiple comparisons were necessary since the differences that were significant were significant at p < 0.001. The UD-radius BMD increased as the ROI was shifted proximally; the increase was significant when shifted even 1 mm proximally (p < 0.001). These same findings held true for the mid- and total radius bone density, though the percent increase with moving proximally was significantly greater for the UD radius than for the other subregions. However, there was no significant change in the one-third radius BMD when shifted proximally 1-10 mm. Minor proximal shifts of the forearm ROI substantially affect the BMD of the UD-, mid- and total radius, while having no effect on the one-third radius BMD. Since the one-third radius is the only forearm region usually reported, minor proximal shifts of the ROI should not influence forearm BMD results significantly.

Direct Comparison of the Precision of the New Hologic Horizon Model With the Old Discovery Model.

Previous publications suggested that the precision of the new Hologic Horizon densitometer might be better than that of the previous Discovery model, but these observations were confounded by not using the same participants and technologists on both densitometers. We sought to study this issue methodically by measuring in vivo precision in both densitometers using the same patients and technologists. Precision studies for the Horizon and Discovery models were done by acquiring spine, hip, and forearm bone mineral density twice on 30 participants. The set of 4 scans on each participant (2 on the Discovery, 2 on the Horizon) was acquired by the same technologist using the same scanning mode. The pairs of data were used to calculate the least significant change according to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines. The significance of the difference between least significant changes was assessed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test of the difference between the mean square error of the absolute value of the differences between paired measurements on the Discovery (Δ-Discovery) and the mean square error of the absolute value of the differences between paired measurements on the Horizon (Δ-Horizon). At virtually all anatomic sites, there was a nonsignificant trend for the precision to be better for the Horizon than for the Discovery. As more vertebrae were excluded from analysis, the precision deteriorated on both densitometers. The precision between densitometers was almost identical when reporting only 1 vertebral body. (1) There was a nonsignificant trend for greater precision on the new Hologic Horizon compared with the older Discovery model. (2) The difference in precision of the spine bone mineral density between the Horizon and the Discovery models decreases as fewer vertebrae are included. (3) These findings are substantially similar to previously published results which had not controlled as well for confounding from using different subjects and technologists.

Enhanced Precision of the New Hologic Horizon Model Compared With the Old Discovery Model Is Less Evident When Fewer Vertebrae Are Included in the Analysis.

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines recommend using locally derived precision data for spine bone mineral densities (BMDs), but do not specify whether data derived from L1-L4 spines correctly reflect the precision for spines reporting fewer than 4 vertebrae. Our experience suggested that the decrease in precision with successively fewer vertebrae is progressive as more vertebrae are excluded and that the precision for the newer Horizon Hologic model might be better than that for the previous model, and we sought to quantify. Precision studies were performed on Hologic densitometers by acquiring spine BMD in fast array mode twice on 30 patients, according to International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines. This was done 10 different times on various Discovery densitometers, and once on a Horizon densitometer. When 1 vertebral body was excluded from analysis, there was no significant deterioration in precision. When 2 vertebrae were excluded, there was a nonsignificant trend to poorer precision, and when 3 vertebrae were excluded, there was significantly worse precision. When 3 or 4 vertebrae were reported, the precision of the spine BMD measurement was significantly better on the Hologic Horizon than on the Discovery, but the difference in precision between densitometers narrowed and was no longer significant when 1 or 2 vertebrae were reported. The results suggest that (1) the measurement of in vivo spine BMD on the new Hologic Horizon densitometer is significantly more precise than on the older Discovery model; (2) the difference in precision between the Horizon and Discovery models decreases as fewer vertebrae are included; (3) the measurement of spine BMD is less precise as more vertebrae are excluded, but still quite reasonable even when only 1 vertebral body is included; and (4) when 3 vertebrae are reported, L1-L4 precision data can reasonably be used to report significance of changes in BMD. When 1 or 2 vertebrae are reported, precision data for 1 or 2 vertebrae, respectively, should be used, because the exclusion of 2-3 vertebrae significantly worsens precision.

Integration of systematic clinical interprofessional training in a student-faculty collaborative primary care practice.

The changing healthcare environment and movement toward team-based care are contemporary challenges confronting health professional education. The primary care workforce must be prepared with recent national interprofessional competencies to practice and lead in this changing environment. From 2012 to 2014, the weekly Beth Israel Deaconess Crimson Care Collaborative Student-Faculty Practice collaborated with Northeastern University to develop, implement and evaluate an innovative model that incorporated interprofessional education into primary care practice with the goal of improving student understanding of, and ability to deliver quality, team-based care. In the monthly interprofessional clinic, an educational curriculum empowered students with evidence-based, team-based care principles. Integration of nursing, pharmacy, medicine, and masters of public health students and faculty into direct patient care, provided the opportunity to practice skills. The TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire was administered pre- and post-intervention to assess its perceived impact. Seventeen students completed the post-intervention survey. Survey data indicated very positive attitudes towards team-based care at baseline. Significant improvements were reported in attitudes towards situation monitoring, limiting personal conflict, administration support and communication. However, small, but statistically significant declines were seen on one team structure and two communication items. Our program provides further evidence for the use of interprofessional training in primary care.

Cleaning practices in the hospital setting: Are high-touch surfaces in isolation and standard precaution patient rooms cleaned to the same standard?

The purpose of this quality improvement project was to identify differences in cleaning practices between isolation rooms and standard precaution rooms in the hospital setting. An ultravoilet marking system was used to evaluate high-touch surfaces throughout the patient environment. Results reveal the importance of refining training systems to reflect staff perceptions and improve evaluation processes across systems in an effort to reduce health care-associated infections.

Effect of Clothing on Measurement of Bone Mineral Density.

It is unknown whether allowing patients to have BMD (bone mineral density) studies acquired while wearing radiolucent clothing adlib contributes appreciably to the measurement error seen. To examine this question, a spine phantom was scanned 30 times without any clothing, while draped with a gown, and while draped with heavy winter clothing. The effect on mean BMD and on SD (standard deviation) was assessed. The effect of clothing on mean or SD of the area was not significant. The effect of clothing on mean and SD for BMD was small but significant and was around 1.6% for the mean. However, the effect on BMD precision was much more clinically important. Without clothing the spine phantom had an least significant change of 0.0077 gm/cm(2), while when introducing variability of clothing the least significant change rose as high as 0.0305 gm/cm(2). We conclude that, adding clothing to the spine phantom had a small but statistically significant effect on the mean BMD and on variance of the measurement. It is unlikely that the effect on mean BMD has any clinical significance, but the effect on the reproducibility (precision) of the result is likely clinically significant.

Utility of Reviewing Radiology Studies in Electronic Medical Records When Preparing Bone Mineral Density Reports.

We quantitated how often review of recent radiology studies provides information useful to the densitometrist. While preparing bone mineral density (BMD) reports on 1012 consecutive patients, radiology reports in electronic medical records (EMRs) for the previous 5 years at potentially relevant sites (lumbar spine X-rays, abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans, and so forth) were reviewed. When a study was found, it received a grade according to how relevant findings were to the BMD report: "1" for studies that were irrelevant, "2" for those that confirmed the impression formed from review of the BMD images, "3" for those that clarified the impression that was unclear after reviewing the BMD images, and "4" for those that revealed new relevant data when no abnormality was noted on review of the BMD images. A total of 562 patients (55.5%) had a radiologic study at a site of potential interest within the past 5 years. Fifty-three patients (5.2% of all patients) had a grade 4 study, 88 patients (8.7% of all patients) had a grade 3 study, and 185 patients (18.3% of all patients) had a grade 2 study. Two hundred sixty-four patients (25.8%) had a grade 2 or 3 study, and 299 (29.5%) had a grade 2-4 study. The radiographic study that was most likely to be found in patients' EMR was chest X-ray (34.7% of all patients), but it was also the one that was least likely to have any relevance to the reader; only 10.5% of the total chest X-rays were graded 2-4. The next most likely studies to be found in patients' EMR were abdominal CT scans (18.0% of all patients) and lumbar spine X-rays (14.4% of all patients), but these studies were much more likely to be useful to the reader, as 62.6% of abdominal CT scans and 78.1% of lumbar spine X-rays were graded 2-4. The likelihood of a patient having radiologic examinations in the EMR at sites potentially relevant to the BMD reader is high, but the likelihood that these clarify abnormalities noted on BMD is only moderate. Review of the EMR is unlikely to be relevant when the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images are normal.

Inconsistency in filling in the bottom of the spine bone map affects reported spine bone mineral density.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that variability from year to year in how much of the bone map was filled in at the bottom of the spine region of interest (ROI) contributes substantially to variability in measurement of spine bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: A total of 110 spine BMDs with defects in the bone mapping at the bottom were reanalyzed, with the only change being manually drawing a straight line across the bottom of the ROI and filling in the bone map. RESULTS: The mean (SD) change in area, bone mineral content, and BMD for total spine when the bottom of the bone map was filled in was 0.919 (0.411) cm2, 0.201 (0.121) g, and -0.0098 (0.0043) g/cm2, respectively, and all changes were significant (P<.0001). The largest individual change in total spine BMD with reanalysis was 0.0238 g/cm2, close to the least significant change (LSC) of 0.026 g/cm2 in our center. To quantify variability due to this change in analysis, we calculated an LSC(fill), in which the pairs of scans consisted of the same scan before and after filling in the bottom of the spine bone map, without any other change. The LSC(fill) attributable just to the reanalysis of missing bone map at the bottom of the spine was 0.021 g/cm2, suggesting substantial variance due to variability in mapping the bottom of the spine. CONCLUSION: When there is a noticeable defect in the bottom of the spine bone map, filling this defect in consistently eliminates a significant source of variability in analysis of spine BMDs and might allow us to achieve smaller LSCs.