Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 227
Filter
2.
IJTLD Open ; 1(7): 283-284, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39035430

ABSTRACT

The launch of IJTLD OPEN, which is fully compliant with Plan S, has extended our author base and allowed readers worldwide to access the content for free. PubMed Central (PMC) has recently approved the journal for indexing (including indexing by PubMed), which will further improve visibility and access. Because authors retain copyright they can use their articles without restriction (e.g., to post on free digital repositories), helping to further disseminate their research. All these factors help to ensure that IJTLD OPEN has maximum reach and impact. However, we recognise that fees for open access may present a barrier for authors based in low- to middle-income countries. We call on the international community to ensure funding support for open access is broadly available, with equal opportunity for researchers worldwide.

3.
IJTLD Open ; 1(3): 103-110, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38966407

ABSTRACT

In 2022, the WHO European Region accounted for 15.1% of all incident rifampicin-resistant/multidrug-resistant TB (RR/MDR-TB) cases. Most occurred in 18 high-priority countries of eastern Europe and central Asia, many of which joined an initiative led by the WHO Regional Office for Europe. The aim was to introduce three, fully oral, 9-month modified shorter treatment regimens (mSTR) to treat RR/MDR-TB under operational research conditions. The three regimens were: 1) bedaquiline + linezolid + levofloxacin + clofazimine + cycloserine (BdqLzdLfxCfzCs); 2) BdqLzdLfxCfz + delamanid (Dlm) for children over 6 years of age and adults; and 3) DlmLzdLfxCfz for children under 6 years of age. The project aimed to enhance treatment success, facilitate mSTR implementation, promote quality of care and build research capacity, while also contributing to global knowledge on all-oral mSTR use. Between April 2020 and June 2022, >2,800 patients underwent mSTR treatment in the WHO European Region. This unique experience promoted further collaboration with national tuberculosis programmes, health authorities, experts and donors within and outside Europe, with a focus on implementing operational research and improving the quality of care in high TB burden countries of the region. In the hope of encouraging others to adopt this model, we have described the principles of the initiative, its strengths and weaknesses and next steps.


En 2022, la Région européenne de l'OMS a recensé 15,1% de l'ensemble des cas de TB résistante à la rifampicine/multirésistante aux médicaments (RR/MDR-TB). La majorité de ces cas ont eu lieu dans 18 pays hautement prioritaires d'Europe orientale et d'Asie centrale, parmi lesquels de nombreux ont adhéré à une initiative dirigée par le Bureau régional de l'OMS pour l'Europe. L'objectif était de mettre en place trois schémas thérapeutiques modifiés plus courts de 9 mois, entièrement oraux, (mSTR, pour l'anglais "fully oral, 9-month modified shorter treatment regimens ¼) pour le traitement de la RR/MDR-TB dans le cadre d'une recherche opérationnelle. Ces trois schémas étaient les suivants 1) bédaquiline + linézolide + lévofloxacine + clofazimine + cyclosérine (BdqLzdLfxCfzCs) ; 2) BdqLzdLfxCfz + delamanid (Dlm) pour les enfants de plus de 6 ans et les adultes ; et 3) DlmLzdLfxCfz pour les enfants de moins de 6 ans. Le projet visait à améliorer l'efficacité des traitements, à faciliter l'application des mSTR, à promouvoir la qualité des soins et à renforcer les capacités de recherche, tout en contribuant aux connaissances mondiales sur l'utilisation des mSTR par voie orale. Entre avril 2020 et juin 2022, plus de 2 800 patients ont reçu un traitement par mSTR dans la Région Européenne de l'OMS. Cette expérience unique a encouragé la continuation de la collaboration avec les programmes nationaux de lutte contre la TB, les autorités sanitaires, les experts et les donateurs tant en Europe qu'à l'étranger. L'accent est mis sur la mise en œuvre de la recherche opérationnelle et l'amélioration de la qualité des soins dans les pays de la région où la TB est fortement prévalente. Nous avons détaillé les principes de l'initiative, ses avantages et ses inconvénients, dans l'espoir d'inciter d'autres pays à suivre cet exemple, tout en exposant les étapes à venir.

4.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 28(8): 365-366, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39049173

ABSTRACT

We present an update on how the IJTLD is performing against targets set in our Editorial Plan for 2020-2025. In terms of impact factor, the journal is ahead of schedule, and has recently moved into quartile 1 for respiratory journals. Analysis also indicates that articles within the IJTLD are being incorporated into policy documents by international agencies and leading institutes. Data are presented to illustrate this global reach.


Subject(s)
Journal Impact Factor , Policy Making , Humans , Periodicals as Topic , Editorial Policies , Health Policy
5.
IJTLD Open ; 1(1): 50-55, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38919409

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2022, 11 of 22 Member States of the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) had an estimated TB incidence of <20 cases per 100,000 population. We assessed preparedness for elimination and provided recommendations to pursue the process. METHODS: We surveyed 11 EMR national TB programme managers and collected information on eight TB elimination framework domains using a close-ended data collection tool. We compiled, consolidated and validated data, including a virtual consultation before triangulating data with other sources. RESULTS: Implementation was sufficient (≥74%) for 5 of 8 domains, highest for TB infection management, TB preventive treatment, laboratory service, drug management, drug-resistant TB and TB-HIV collaboration (89%, 83% and 78%, respectively). Countries ranked lowest for commitment (73%), operational research and infection control (63%), and partnership/collaborations (41%). Five countries reached >80% when consolidating the responses, reaching sufficient from all domains. Two reached <50%. CONCLUSION: Key identified obstacles to TB elimination in EMR were insufficient commitment/financing, sub-optimal partnerships/collaborations and operational research calling for 1) all-stakeholder-inclusive, sustainably funded TB elimination plans, 2) cost-effective tools to exchange strategic information and build operational research capacity, and 3) improved collaboration.


CONTEXTE: En 2022, 11 des 22 États membres de la Région de la Méditerranée orientale de l'OMS avaient une incidence de la TB estimée à moins de 20 cas pour 100 000 habitants. Nous avons évalué l'état de préparation à l'élimination et formulé des recommandations pour poursuivre le processus. MÉTHODES: Nous avons interrogé 11 responsables de programmes nationaux de lutte contre la TB dans la région de la Méditerranée orientale et recueilli des informations sur huit domaines du cadre d'élimination de la TB à l'aide d'un outil de collecte de données à questions fermées. Nous avons compilé, consolidé et validé les données, y compris lors d'une consultation virtuelle, avant de les trianguler avec d'autres sources. RÉSULTATS: La mise en œuvre était suffisante (≥74%) pour 5 des 8 domaines, les plus élevés étant la gestion de l'infection tuberculeuse, le traitement préventif de la TB, les services de laboratoire, la gestion des médicaments, la TB pharmacorésistante et la collaboration TB-VIH (89%, 83% et 78%, respectivement). Les pays se sont classés au dernier rang pour l'engagement (73%), la recherche opérationnelle et la lutte contre l'infection (63%) et le partenariat/la collaboration (41%). Cinq pays ont atteint >80% lors de la consolidation des réponses, atteignant un niveau suffisant dans tous les domaines. Deux pays ont atteint un taux de réponse inférieur à 50%. CONCLUSION: Les principaux obstacles à l'élimination de la TB dans les pays de l'Union européenne sont un engagement/un financement insuffisant, des partenariats/collaborations sous-optimaux et une recherche opérationnelle nécessitant 1) des plans d'élimination de la TB incluant toutes les parties prenantes et bénéficiant d'un financement durable, 2) des outils rentables permettant d'échanger des informations stratégiques et de renforcer les capacités de recherche opérationnelle, et 3) une meilleure collaboration.

8.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 28(5): 225-230, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38659141

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTIONAlpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency, an autosomal co-dominant condition, decreases protein concentration and activity at both serum and tissue levels. Few studies investigated whether the type of SERPINA1 gene phenotype in patients with severe asthma can influence symptoms and disease control during follow-up.OBJECTIVETo assess whether the presence of a non-MM genotype of SERPINA1 in patients with severe asthma is associated with disease control, systemic and airway inflammation, lung function and comorbidities prevalence compared to severe asthma patients with a homozygous genotype (MM).METHODSAsthmatic patients belonging to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) step 5 were retrospectively analysed in an Italian reference asthma clinic. We collected clinical, biological and functional variables at baseline and for the three following years.RESULTSOut of 73 patients enrolled, 14 (19.18%) were non-MM and 59 (80.8%) were MM. Asthmatics with non-MM genotype had lower serum AAT concentration (P = 0.004) and higher emphysema prevalence than the MM group (P = 0.003) at baseline. During follow up, only MM patients showed a significant improvement of both ACQ-6 score (P < 0.0001) and eosinophilic systemic inflammation (P < 0.0001).CONCLUSIONSOur findings emphasise the importance of a screening for AAT deficiency in severe asthma, as alleles mutation may influence patient's follow-up..


Subject(s)
Asthma , Genotype , Phenotype , Severity of Illness Index , alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency , alpha 1-Antitrypsin , Humans , Female , alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency/genetics , alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency/complications , alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency/epidemiology , alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , alpha 1-Antitrypsin/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Italy/epidemiology , Prevalence
9.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 28(3): 130-135, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454180

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTIONTo determine the frequency of TB among patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs).METHODSWe performed a comprehensive search in the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and Scopus databases up to 1 August 2023 of studies reporting on the prevalence of TB among patients with ILDs.RESULTSTwelve studies comprising 3,817 patients with ILD were found: the pooled prevalence of TB among ILD patients was 11.0% (95% CI 5.4-21.0). In the subgroup analysis, the TB rate among patients with silicosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) was respectively 35.6% (95% CI 32.6-38.8) and 4.4% (95% CI 3.6-5.3) (P = 0.00). The frequency of TB among ILD patients was higher in high TB burden countries than in low/intermediate-burden countries: 26.3%, 95% CI 17.7-37.3 vs. 4.9%, 95% CI 3.3-7.2; P = 0.00.CONCLUSIONSThis study shows the frequency of TB among ILD patients. The meta-analysis reveals a significantly increased prevalence of TB among ILD patients with silicosis compared to IPF, and among individuals in high TB burden countries than in those with low/intermediate burden. The study results can help physicians and policymakers make efficient decisions for prompt screening and anti-TB treatment initiation in ILD patients..


Subject(s)
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Silicosis , Tuberculosis , Humans , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Prevalence , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/epidemiology , Silicosis/epidemiology , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/epidemiology
13.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 27(12): 879, 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38042978
14.
Pulmonology ; 2023 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37679219

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Post-tuberculosis lung disease (PTLD), as other chronic respiratory disorders, may have infectious complications; some of them can be prevented with vaccinations. So far, no document has discussed the potential role of vaccination in PTLD. Therefore, the objective of this review was to describe vaccination recommendations to prevent infections potentially capable of complicating PTLD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A non-systematic review of the literature was conducted. The following keywords were used: tuberculosis, vaccination, vaccines and PTLD. PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were used as the search engine, focusing on English-language literature only. RESULTS: We identified 9 vaccines potentially useful in PTLD. Influenza, pneumococcal and anti-COVID-19 vaccinations should be recommended. Patients with PTLD can also benefit from vaccination against shingles. Vaccination against pertussis is mainly relevant during childhood. Diphtheria, tetanus and measles vaccination are recommended for general population and should be considered in patients with PTLD not previously vaccinated. Tdap (Tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis) booster should be repeated in every adult every ten years. Vaccination against BCG retains its importance during early childhood in countries where TB is endemic. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination deserves to be considered among the strategies to prevent and/or mitigate PTLD complications. Further evidence is necessary to better understand which vaccines have the greatest impact and cost-benefit.

15.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 27(10): 729-741, 2023 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37749839

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of these clinical standards is to provide guidance on 'best practice' care for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease.METHODS: A panel of international experts representing scientific societies, associations and groups active in post-COVID-19 lung disease was identified; 45 completed a Delphi process. A 5-point Likert scale indicated level of agreement with the draft standards. The final version was approved by consensus (with 100% agreement).RESULTS: Four clinical standards were agreed for patients with a previous history of COVID-19: Standard 1, Patients with sequelae not explained by an alternative diagnosis should be evaluated for possible post-COVID-19 lung disease; Standard 2, Patients with lung function impairment, reduced exercise tolerance, reduced quality of life (QoL) or other relevant signs or ongoing symptoms ≥4 weeks after the onset of first symptoms should be evaluated for treatment and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR); Standard 3, The PR programme should be based on feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness criteria, organised according to local health services and tailored to an individual patient's needs; and Standard 4, Each patient undergoing and completing PR should be evaluated to determine its effectiveness and have access to a counselling/health education session.CONCLUSION: This is the first consensus-based set of clinical standards for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease. Our aim is to improve patient care and QoL by guiding clinicians, programme managers and public health officers in planning and implementing a PR programme to manage post-COVID-19 lung disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Quality of Life , Humans , Disease Progression , Educational Status , Exercise , COVID-19 Testing
16.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 27(9): 658-667, 2023 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37608484

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of these clinical standards is to aid the diagnosis and management of asthma in low-resource settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).METHODS: A panel of 52 experts in the field of asthma in LMICs participated in a two-stage Delphi process to establish and reach a consensus on the clinical standards.RESULTS: Eighteen clinical standards were defined: Standard 1, Every individual with symptoms and signs compatible with asthma should undergo a clinical assessment; Standard 2, In individuals (>6 years) with a clinical assessment supportive of a diagnosis of asthma, a hand-held spirometry measurement should be used to confirm variable expiratory airflow limitation by demonstrating an acute response to a bronchodilator; Standard 3, Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry should be performed in individuals (>6 years) to support diagnosis before treatment is commenced if there is diagnostic uncertainty; Standard 4, Individuals with an acute exacerbation of asthma and clinical signs of hypoxaemia or increased work of breathing should be given supplementary oxygen to maintain saturation at 94-98%; Standard 5, Inhaled short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABAs) should be used as an emergency reliever in individuals with asthma via an appropriate spacer device for metered-dose inhalers; Standard 6, Short-course oral corticosteroids should be administered in appropriate doses to individuals having moderate to severe acute asthma exacerbations (minimum 3-5 days); Standard 7, Individuals having a severe asthma exacerbation should receive emergency care, including oxygen therapy, systemic corticosteroids, inhaled bronchodilators (e.g., salbutamol with or without ipratropium bromide) and a single dose of intravenous magnesium sulphate should be considered; Standard 8, All individuals with asthma should receive education about asthma and a personalised action plan; Standard 9, Inhaled medications (excluding dry-powder devices) should be administered via an appropriate spacer device in both adults and children. Children aged 0-3 years will require the spacer to be coupled to a face mask; Standard 10, Children aged <5 years with asthma should receive a SABA as-needed at step 1 and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) to cover periods of wheezing due to respiratory viral infections, and SABA as-needed and daily ICS from step 2 upwards; Standard 11, Children aged 6-11 years with asthma should receive an ICS taken whenever an inhaled SABA is used; Standard 12, All adolescents aged 12-18 years and adults with asthma should receive a combination inhaler (ICS and rapid onset of action long-acting beta-agonist [LABA] such as budesonide-formoterol), where available, to be used either as-needed (for mild asthma) or as both maintenance and reliever therapy, for moderate to severe asthma; Standard 13, Inhaled SABA alone for the management of patients aged >12 years is not recommended as it is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. It should only be used where there is no access to ICS.The following standards (14-18) are for settings where there is no access to inhaled medicines. Standard 14, Patients without access to corticosteroids should be provided with a single short course of emergency oral prednisolone; Standard 15, Oral SABA for symptomatic relief should be used only if no inhaled SABA is available. Adjust to the individual's lowest beneficial dose to minimise adverse effects; Standard 16, Oral leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) can be used as a preventive medication and is preferable to the use of long-term oral systemic corticosteroids; Standard 17, In exceptional circumstances, when there is a high risk of mortality from exacerbations, low-dose oral prednisolone daily or on alternate days may be considered on a case-by-case basis; Standard 18. Oral theophylline should be restricted for use in situations where it is the only bronchodilator treatment option available.CONCLUSION: These first consensus-based clinical standards for asthma management in LMICs are intended to help clinicians provide the most effective care for people in resource-limited settings.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Developing Countries , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Humans , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/drug therapy , Albuterol , Prednisolone
17.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 27(8): 584-598, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37491754

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: These clinical standards aim to provide guidance for diagnosis, treatment, and management of drug-susceptible TB in children and adolescents.METHODS: Fifty-two global experts in paediatric TB participated in a Delphi consensus process. After eight rounds of revisions, 51/52 (98%) participants endorsed the final document.RESULTS: Eight standards were identified: Standard 1, Age and developmental stage are critical considerations in the assessment and management of TB; Standard 2, Children and adolescents with symptoms and signs of TB disease should undergo prompt evaluation, and diagnosis and treatment initiation should not depend on microbiological confirmation; Standard 3, Treatment initiation is particularly urgent in children and adolescents with presumptive TB meningitis and disseminated (miliary) TB; Standard 4, Children and adolescents should be treated with an appropriate weight-based regimen; Standard 5, Treating TB infection (TBI) is important to prevent disease; Standard 6, Children and adolescents should receive home-based/community-based treatment support whenever possible; Standard 7, Children, adolescents, and their families should be provided age-appropriate support to optimise engagement in care and clinical outcomes; and Standard 8, Case reporting and contact tracing should be conducted for each child and adolescent.CONCLUSION: These consensus-based clinical standards, which should be adapted to local contexts, will improve the care of children and adolescents affected by TB.


Subject(s)
Tuberculosis, Meningeal , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Tuberculosis, Meningeal/drug therapy , Standard of Care , Delphi Technique , Practice Guidelines as Topic
19.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 27(7): 506-519, 2023 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37353868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adverse effects (AE) to TB treatment cause morbidity, mortality and treatment interruption. The aim of these clinical standards is to encourage best practise for the diagnosis and management of AE.METHODS: 65/81 invited experts participated in a Delphi process using a 5-point Likert scale to score draft standards.RESULTS: We identified eight clinical standards. Each person commencing treatment for TB should: Standard 1, be counselled regarding AE before and during treatment; Standard 2, be evaluated for factors that might increase AE risk with regular review to actively identify and manage these; Standard 3, when AE occur, carefully assessed and possible allergic or hypersensitivity reactions considered; Standard 4, receive appropriate care to minimise morbidity and mortality associated with AE; Standard 5, be restarted on TB drugs after a serious AE according to a standardised protocol that includes active drug safety monitoring. In addition: Standard 6, healthcare workers should be trained on AE including how to counsel people undertaking TB treatment, as well as active AE monitoring and management; Standard 7, there should be active AE monitoring and reporting for all new TB drugs and regimens; and Standard 8, knowledge gaps identified from active AE monitoring should be systematically addressed through clinical research.CONCLUSION: These standards provide a person-centred, consensus-based approach to minimise the impact of AE during TB treatment.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Hypersensitivity , Tuberculosis , Humans , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/etiology , Health Personnel
20.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 27(7): 493-494, 2023 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37353877
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL