Carbapenem combination therapy versus standard of care for persistent methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

BACKGROUND: Successful use of carbapenems in combination with cefazolin or oxacillin for treatment of MSSA bacteraemia has been described; however, comparative data to standard treatment approaches are lacking. METHODS: This was a multicentre, retrospective study of adult patients with MSSA bacteraemia for >48 h. Standard treatment was considered monotherapy with cefazolin, oxacillin or nafcillin. Combination therapy was defined as the addition of ertapenem or meropenem to standard treatment for at least 24 h. The primary outcome was duration of bacteraemia defined as time from administration of an antibiotic with in vitro activity to first negative blood culture. Time to blood culture sterilization was compared through risk-set matching with aid of a propensity score. RESULTS: Overall, 238 patients were included; 66% (157/238) received standard treatment and 34% (81/238) received combination therapy. The median (IQR) time to carbapenem initiation was 4.7 (3.63-6.5) days. Patients who received combination therapy were younger (P = 0.012), more likely to have endocarditis (P = 0.034) and had longer median duration of bacteraemia (P < 0.001). After applying risk-set matching, patients who received combination therapy experienced faster time to blood culture sterilization compared with control patients [HR = 1.618 (95% CI; 1.119-2.339) P = 0.011]. Using a paired hazard model, 90 day mortality rates were not statistically different among patients who received combination therapy versus matched controls [HR = 1.267 (95% CI; 0.610-2.678), P = 0.608]. DISCUSSION: Carbapenem combination therapy resulted in faster time to blood culture sterilization, but no differences in overall mortality rates. Randomized trials are critical to determine the utility of carbapenem combination therapy.

Clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes for patients with Pseudomonas endocarditis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate clinical outcomes of patients with Pseudomonas endocarditis and identify factors associated with treatment failure. METHODS: Adult patients meeting definitive Duke's criteria for Pseudomonas endocarditis at 11 hospitals were identified between May 2000 and February 2024. Failure was defined as death or microbiological failure by day 42. First-line therapy consisted of cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime or ceftolozane/tazobactam alone or in combination. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients met inclusion criteria; 29% were persons who inject drugs and 13% were organ transplant recipients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the causative species in 98% of cases. Patients who experienced 42 day cure were more likely to be initially managed with first-line ß-lactam agents compared with those who experienced clinical failure (97% versus 62%, P = 0.004). Treatment with first-line ß-lactams was associated with shorter time to treatment initiation and a lower likelihood of infection due to MDR Pseudomonas spp. In the univariate model, patients who experienced 90 day mortality were more likely to have prosthetic valve endocarditis (57% versus 24%, P = 0.02), an intracardiac complication (36% versus 9%, P = 0.04) and a higher median (IQR) Pitt bacteraemia score [2.5 (2-3.8) versus 1 (0-2), P = 0.048]. Combination therapy did not improve clinical outcomes but did increase the rate of adverse effects resulting in drug discontinuation compared with monotherapy, (21% versus 0%, P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of Pseudomonas endocarditis to date. We identified improved clinical outcomes when cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime or ceftolozane/tazobactam were used for initial treatment. We did not identify a clinical benefit for combination treatment.

Initial micafungin treatment does not improve outcomes compared to fluconazole treatment in immunocompromised and critically ill patients with candidaemia.

BACKGROUND: Candidaemia is associated with poor outcomes including high mortality rates. Controversy remains regarding whether fluconazole or an echinocandin is the optimal choice for initial candidaemia treatment, particularly among high-risk patients such as the immunocompromised or critically ill. OBJECTIVES: To understand optimal initial treatment of candidaemia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of immunocompromised or ICU adult patients with candidaemia from 2010 to 2014. Patients who received ≥3 consecutive days of initial treatment with fluconazole or micafungin were included. The primary outcome was complete response at day 14, defined as clinical improvement and blood culture sterilization. Secondary outcomes included microbiological and clinical success, survival and recurrent candidaemia. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients were included; 76 received fluconazole and 121 received micafungin. There was no difference in complete response between the fluconazole and micafungin groups (ICU: 38% versus 40%, P = 0.87; immunocompromised: 57% versus 59%, P = 0.80). Secondary outcomes including survival were also similar. In multivariable analysis, among ICU patients, Pitt bacteraemia score < 4 (P = 0.002) and time to antifungal (P = 0.037) were associated with meeting the primary outcome; white blood cell count > 11 cells × 103/µL on day 0 (P < 0.001) and Candida isolated from a non-blood site (P = 0.025) were associated with not meeting the primary outcome. Among immunocompromised patients, white blood cells > 11 × 103/µL (P = 0.003) and Candida isolated from a non-blood site (P = 0.026) were associated with not meeting the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that among ICU or immunocompromised patients, severity of illness rather than initial antifungal choice drove clinical outcomes.

Rates of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam among patients treated for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia or pneumonia.

Among consecutive patients with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia or pneumonia we found those treated with ceftazidime-avibactam were more likely to develop resistance (defined as ≥4-fold increased MIC) than those treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (40% vs. 10%; P=0.002). Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance was associated with new mutations in ampC and efflux regulatory pathways.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Patients with Bacteremia or Nosocomial Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a combination of the third-generation cephalosporin ceftazidime and the novel, non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor avibactam that is approved for the treatment of pediatric (≥ 3 months) and adult patients with complicated infections including hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP), and bacteremia. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022362856) aimed to provide a quantitative and qualitative synthesis to evaluate the effectiveness of CAZ-AVI in treating adult patients with bacteremia or nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (non metallo-ß-lactamase-producing strains) and multi-drug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. METHODS: The databases included in the search, until November 7, 2022, were Embase and PubMed. A total of 24 studies (retrospective: 22, prospective: 2) with separate outcomes for patients with bacteremia or pneumonia were included. RESULTS: The outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality, clinical cure, and microbiological cure. Qualitative (24 studies) and quantitative (8/24 studies) syntheses were performed. The quality of the studies was assessed using the MINORS checklist and the overall risk of bias was moderate to high. CONCLUSIONS: In studies included in the meta-analysis, lower all-cause mortality for patients with bacteremia (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.19-0.46) and improved rates of clinical cure for patients with bacteremia (OR = 4.90, 95% CI 2.60-9.23) and nosocomial pneumonia (OR = 3.20, 95% CI 1.55-6.60) was observed in the CAZ-AVI group compared with the comparator group. Data provided here may be considered while using CAZ-AVI for the treatment of patients with difficult-to-treat infections. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022362856.

Development of Predictive Models to Inform a Novel Risk Categorization Framework for Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli-Caused Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, challenges in identifying patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) at risk of antibiotic nonsusceptibility may lead to inappropriate prescribing and contribute to antibiotic resistance. We developed predictive models to quantify risk of nonsusceptibility to 4 commonly prescribed antibiotic classes for uUTI, identify predictors of nonsusceptibility to each class, and construct a corresponding risk categorization framework for nonsusceptibility. METHODS: Eligible females aged ≥12 years with Escherichia coli-caused uUTI were identified from Optum's de-identified Electronic Health Record dataset (1 October 2015-29 February 2020). Four predictive models were developed to predict nonsusceptibility to each antibiotic class and a risk categorization framework was developed to classify patients' isolates as low, moderate, and high risk of nonsusceptibility to each antibiotic class. RESULTS: Predictive models were developed among 87 487 patients. Key predictors of having a nonsusceptible isolate to ≥3 antibiotic classes included number of previous UTI episodes, prior ß-lactam nonsusceptibility, prior fluoroquinolone treatment, Census Bureau region, and race. The risk categorization framework classified 8.1%, 14.4%, 17.4%, and 6.3% of patients as having isolates at high risk of nonsusceptibility to nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ß-lactams, and fluoroquinolones, respectively. Across classes, the proportion of patients categorized as having high-risk isolates was 3- to 12-fold higher among patients with nonsusceptible isolates versus susceptible isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Our predictive models highlight factors that increase risk of nonsusceptibility to antibiotics for uUTIs, while the risk categorization framework contextualizes risk of nonsusceptibility to these treatments. Our findings provide valuable insight to clinicians treating uUTIs and may help inform empiric prescribing in this population.

The growing threat of NDM-producing E. coli with penicillin-binding protein 3 mutations in the United States - is there a potential role for durlobactam?

We report identification of 5 patients with infections caused by NDM-5-producing E. coli harboring PBP3 mutations that showed reduced susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam and cefiderocol. Durlobactam, a novel diazabicyclooctane ß-lactamase inhibitor, demonstrated minimum inhibitory concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 2 µg/mL supporting future investigations into a potential role in clinical management.

Real-world evaluation of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam across US medical centres.

We assessed 160 patients who received imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam for ≥2 days. At treatment initiation, the median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5, 45% were in the intensive care unit, and 19% required vasopressor support. The in-hospital mortality rate was 24%. These data advance our understanding of real-world indications and outcomes of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam use.

Harnessing the Diversity of Burkholderia spp. Prophages for Therapeutic Potential.

Burkholderia spp. are often resistant to antibiotics, and infections with these organisms are difficult to treat. A potential alternative treatment for Burkholderia spp. infections is bacteriophage (phage) therapy; however, it can be difficult to locate phages that target these bacteria. Prophages incorporated into the bacterial genome have been identified within Burkholderia spp. and may represent a source of useful phages for therapy. Here, we investigate whether prophages within Burkholderia spp. clinical isolates can kill conspecific and heterospecific isolates. Thirty-two Burkholderia spp. isolates were induced for prophage release, and harvested phages were tested for lytic activity against the same 32 isolates. Temperate phages were passaged and their host ranges were determined, resulting in four unique phages of prophage origin that showed different ranges of lytic activity. We also analyzed the prophage content of 35 Burkholderia spp. clinical isolate genomes and identified several prophages present in the genomes of multiple isolates of the same species. Finally, we observed that Burkholdera cenocepacia isolates were more phage-susceptible than Burkholderia multivorans isolates. Overall, our findings suggest that prophages present within Burkholderia spp. genomes are a potentially useful starting point for the isolation and development of novel phages for use in phage therapy.

Harnessing the diversity of Burkholderia spp. prophages for therapeutic potential.

Burkholderia spp. are often resistant to antibiotics, and infections with these organisms are difficult to treat. A potential alternative treatment for Burkholderia spp. infections is bacteriophage (phage) therapy; however, it can be difficult to locate phages that target these bacteria. Prophages incorporated into the bacterial genome have been identified within Burkholderia spp. and may represent a source of useful phages for therapy. Here we investigate whether prophages within Burkholderia spp. clinical isolates can kill conspecific and heterospecific isolates. Thirty-two Burkholderia spp. isolates were induced for prophage release, and harvested prophages were tested for lytic activity against the same 32 isolates. Lytic phages were passaged and their host ranges were determined, resulting in four unique phages of prophage origin that showed different ranges of lytic activity. We also analyzed the prophage content of 35 Burkholderia spp. clinical isolate genomes, and identified several prophages present in the genomes of multiple isolates of the same species. Finally, we observed that B. cenocepacia isolates were more phage-susceptible than Burkholderia multivorans isolates. Overall, our findings suggest that prophages present within Burkholderia spp. genomes are a potentially useful starting point for the isolation and development of novel phages for use in phage therapy.

Bacteriophage and antibiotic combination therapy for recurrent Enterococcus faecium bacteremia.

Enterococcus faecium is a member of the human gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota but can also cause invasive infections, especially in immunocompromised hosts. Enterococci display intrinsic resistance to many antibiotics, and most clinical E. faecium isolates have acquired vancomycin resistance, leaving clinicians with a limited repertoire of effective antibiotics. As such, vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VREfm) has become an increasingly difficult to treat nosocomial pathogen that is often associated with treatment failure and recurrent infections. We followed a patient with recurrent E. faecium bloodstream infections (BSIs) of increasing severity, which ultimately became unresponsive to antibiotic combination therapy over the course of 7 years. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) showed that the patient was colonized with closely related E. faecium strains for at least 2 years and that invasive isolates likely emerged from a large E. faecium population in the patient's gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The addition of bacteriophage (phage) therapy to the patient's antimicrobial regimen was associated with several months of clinical improvement and reduced intestinal burden of VRE and E. faecium. In vitro analysis showed that antibiotic and phage combination therapy improved bacterial growth suppression compared to therapy with either alone. Eventual E. faecium BSI recurrence was not associated with the development of antibiotic or phage resistance in post-treatment isolates. However, an anti-phage-neutralizing antibody response occurred that coincided with an increased relative abundance of VRE in the GI tract, both of which may have contributed to clinical failure. Taken together, these findings highlight the potential utility and limitations of phage therapy to treat antibiotic-resistant enterococcal infections. IMPORTANCE: Phage therapy is an emerging therapeutic approach for treating bacterial infections that do not respond to traditional antibiotics. The addition of phage therapy to systemic antibiotics to treat a patient with recurrent E. faecium infections that were non-responsive to antibiotics alone resulted in fewer hospitalizations and improved the patient's quality of life. Combination phage and antibiotic therapy reduced E. faecium and VRE abundance in the patient's stool. Eventually, an anti-phage antibody response emerged that was able to neutralize phage activity, which may have limited clinical efficacy. This study demonstrates the potential of phages as an additional option in the antimicrobial toolbox for treating invasive enterococcal infections and highlights the need for further investigation to ensure phage therapy can be deployed for maximum clinical benefit.

Differential in vitro susceptibility to ampicillin/ceftriaxone combination therapy among Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis clinical isolates.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the genomic diversity and ß-lactam susceptibilities of Enterococcus faecalis collected from patients with infective endocarditis (IE). METHODS: We collected 60 contemporary E. faecalis isolates from definite or probable IE cases identified between 2018 and 2021 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. We used whole-genome sequencing to study bacterial genomic diversity and employed antibiotic checkerboard assays and a one-compartment pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to investigate bacterial susceptibility to ampicillin and ceftriaxone both alone and in combination. RESULTS: Genetically diverse E. faecalis were collected, however, isolates belonging to two STs, ST6 and ST179, were collected from 21/60 (35%) IE patients. All ST6 isolates encoded a previously described mutation upstream of penicillin-binding protein 4 (pbp4) that is associated with pbp4 overexpression. ST6 isolates had higher ceftriaxone MICs and higher fractional inhibitory concentration index values for ampicillin and ceftriaxone (AC) compared to other isolates, suggesting diminished in vitro AC synergy against this lineage. Introduction of the pbp4 upstream mutation found among ST6 isolates caused increased ceftriaxone resistance in a laboratory E. faecalis isolate. PK/PD testing showed that a representative ST6 isolate exhibited attenuated efficacy of AC combination therapy at humanized antibiotic exposures. CONCLUSIONS: We find evidence for diminished in vitro AC activity among a subset of E. faecalis IE isolates with increased pbp4 expression. These findings suggest that alternate antibiotic combinations against diverse contemporary E. faecalis IE isolates should be evaluated.

Structural insights into the molecular mechanism of high-level ceftazidime-avibactam resistance conferred by CMY-185.

ß-Lactamases can accumulate stepwise mutations that increase their resistance profiles to the latest ß-lactam agents. CMY-185 is a CMY-2-like ß-lactamase and was identified in an Escherichia coli clinical strain isolated from a patient who underwent treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam. CMY-185, possessing four amino acid substitutions of A114E, Q120K, V211S, and N346Y relative to CMY-2, confers high-level ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, and accumulation of the substitutions incrementally enhances the level of resistance to this agent. However, the functional role of each substitution and their interplay in enabling ceftazidime-avibactam resistance remains unknown. Through biochemical and structural analysis, we present the molecular basis for the enhanced ceftazidime hydrolysis and impaired avibactam inhibition conferred by CMY-185. The substituted Y346 residue is a major driver of the functional evolution as it rejects primary avibactam binding due to the steric hindrance and augments oxyimino-cephalosporin hydrolysis through a drastic structural change, rotating the side chain of Y346 and then disrupting the H-10 helix structure. The other substituted residues E114 and K120 incrementally contribute to rejection of avibactam inhibition, while S211 stimulates the turnover rate of the oxyimino-cephalosporin hydrolysis. These findings indicate that the N346Y substitution is capable of simultaneously expanding the spectrum of activity against some of the latest ß-lactam agents with altered bulky side chains and rejecting the binding of ß-lactamase inhibitors. However, substitution of additional residues may be required for CMY enzymes to achieve enhanced affinity or turnover rate of the ß-lactam agents leading to clinically relevant levels of resistance.IMPORTANCECeftazidime-avibactam has a broad spectrum of activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales including strains with or without production of serine carbapenemases. After its launch, emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant strains that produce mutated ß-lactamases capable of efficiently hydrolyzing ceftazidime or impairing avibactam inhibition are increasingly reported. Furthermore, cross-resistance towards cefiderocol, the latest cephalosporin in clinical use, has been observed in some instances. Here, we clearly demonstrate the functional role of the substituted residues in CMY-185, a four amino-acid variant of CMY-2 identified in a patient treated with ceftazidime-avibactam, for high-level resistance to this agent and low-level resistance to cefiderocol. These findings provide structural insights into how ß-lactamases may incrementally alter their structures to escape multiple advanced ß-lactam agents.

In vitro activity of clindamycin, doxycycline, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole against clinical isolates of ß-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. via BD Phoenix and broth microdilution.

We tested 85 isolates of ß-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. against trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), clindamycin, and doxycycline by broth microdilution (BMD) and BD Phoenix. Susceptibility rates via BMD for TMP/SMX, clindamycin, and doxycycline were 100%, 85.5%, and 56.6%, respectively. TMP/SMX is a potential monotherapy agent for ß-hemolytic Streptococcus skin and soft tissue infections.

Stewardship-Guided T2Candida Testing Shortens Time to Antifungal Treatment and Reduces Antifungal Usage Among Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients With Septic Shock.

Background: Diagnosis of invasive candidiasis (IC) is limited by insensitivity and slow turnaround of cultures. Our objectives were to define the performance of T2Candida, a nonculture test, under guidance of a diagnostic stewardship program, and evaluate impact on time to antifungal initiation and antifungal utilization. Methods: This was a retrospective study of adult medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients with septic shock for whom T2Candida testing was performed from March 2017 to March 2020. Patients with positive T2Candida results during this period were compared to MICU patients who did not undergo T2Candida testing but had septic shock and blood cultures positive for Candida from January 2016 through March 2020. Results: Overall, 155 T2Candida tests from 143 patients were included. Nine percent of T2Candida tests were positive compared to 4.5% of blood cultures. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of T2Candida for proven and probable IC were 78%, 95%, 50%, and 99%, respectively. Patients who tested positive for T2Candida (n = 14) were diagnosed earlier and initiated on antifungal therapy sooner than patients with IC (n = 14) diagnosed by blood culture alone (median, 5.6 vs 60 hours; P < .0001). Median antifungal days of therapy/1000 patient-days were 23.3/month preimplementation and 15/month postimplementation (P  = .007). Following a negative T2Candida result, empiric antifungals were either not administered in 58% or discontinued within 72 hours in 96% of patients. Conclusions: Diagnostic stewardship guided T2Candida testing resulted in reduced time to IC diagnosis, faster initiation of antifungal therapy, and lower antifungal usage among MICU patients with septic shock.

Mutations in ompK36 differentially impact in vitro synergy of meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftazidime/avibactam in combination with other antibiotics against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Objectives: Ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are preferred agents for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections and are often used in combination with other agents. We aimed to characterize the synergy of combinations against KPC-Kp with varying ompK36 genotypes. Methods: KPC-Kp that harboured ompK36 WT, IS5 or glycine-aspartic acid duplication (GD) genotypes were selected. MICs were determined in triplicate. Synergy was assessed by time-kill assays for ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam in combination with colistin, gentamicin, tigecycline, meropenem or fosfomycin against 1 × 108 cfu/mL KPC-Kp. Results: KPC-Kp harboured ompK36 WT (n = 5), IS5 (n = 5) or GD (n = 5); 11 were KPC-2 and 4 were KPC-3. All were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. In time-kill analysis, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam 1 × MIC exhibited mean 24 h log-kills of -2.01 and -0.84, respectively. Ceftazidime/avibactam was synergistic in combination with colistin independent of ompK36 genotype. Ceftazidime/avibactam combinations impacted by porin mutations (compared to WT) were meropenem (-5.18 versus -6.62 mean log-kill, P < 0.001) and fosfomycin (-3.98 versus -6.58, P = 0.058). Mean log-kills with meropenem/vaborbactam were greatest in combination with gentamicin (-5.36). In the presence of porin mutations, meropenem/vaborbactam killing activity was potentiated by the addition of colistin (-6.65 versus -0.70, P = 0.03) and fosfomycin (-3.12 versus 1.54, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Our results shed new light on the synergy of ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam combinations against KPC-Kp with or without porin mutations. Killing activity of ceftazidime/avibactam with other cell wall active agents was decreased against isolates with porin mutations. On the other hand, some meropenem/vaborbactam combinations demonstrated enhanced killing in the presence of porin mutations.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrating evolved resistance to novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors.

Background: Cefiderocol demonstrates excellent activity against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa; however, the activity against isolates from patients previously treated with ß-lactam agents is unknown. We aimed to determine the activity of cefiderocol against P. aeruginosa collected before and after treatment with traditional ß-lactams and new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors. Methods: Cefiderocol MICs were determined in triplicate in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth and compared with ß-lactam MICs tested by standard methods. All isolates underwent WGS analysis to identify mutations associated with resistance. Results: One hundred and seventy-eight P. aeruginosa isolates were evaluated; 48% (86/178) were non-susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and/or imipenem/relebactam. The cefiderocol MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.12 and 1 mg/L, respectively. Median cefiderocol MICs did not vary against isolates classified as MDR, XDR, or those non-susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and/or imipenem/relebactam when compared with non-MDR isolates. Against isolates collected from patients previously treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol MICs were increased 4-fold compared with baseline. Cross-resistance to cefiderocol was identified in 21% (3/14) of patients who developed treatment-emergent resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Overall, 6% (11/178) of isolates demonstrated cefiderocol MICs ≥2 mg/L, which were disproportionately collected from patients previously treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam (73%; 8/11). Isolates with reduced cefiderocol susceptibility harboured mutations in ampC, tonB-dependent receptors, the response regulator pirR and ftsI. Conclusions: Cefiderocol demonstrates excellent in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa isolates exposed to other novel ß-lactam agents; however, some exceptions were identified. Cross-resistance between cefiderocol and ceftolozane/tazobactam was evident, but not with ceftazidime/avibactam or imipenem/relebactam. Reduced cefiderocol susceptibility was mediated by mutations in ampC and tonB-dependent receptors.

Serratia endocarditis: antimicrobial management strategies and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of Serratia endocarditis is increasing, yet optimal treatment has not been defined. Our objective was to investigate the outcomes of patients with Serratia endocarditis by treatment strategy. METHODS: We reviewed adult patients with definitive Serratia endocarditis at two independent health systems between July 2001 and April 2023. Combination therapy was defined as receipt of ≥2 in vitro active agents for ≥72 h. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were included; 64% (48/75) were male and 85% (64/75) were people who inject drugs. Compared with monotherapy, receipt of combination therapy was associated with lower rates of microbiological failure (0% versus 15%, P = 0.026) and 90 day all-cause mortality (11% versus 31%, P = 0.049). Antimicrobial discontinuation due to an adverse event was more common among patients receiving combination therapy compared with monotherapy (36% versus 8%, P = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest series of Serratia endocarditis to date, combination antibiotic treatment was associated with improved outcomes. However, larger, prospective studies are warranted.

Impact of Rapid Identification and Stewardship Intervention on Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus Bloodstream Infection.

We investigated the impact of rapid diagnostic testing with and without algorithm-based stewardship recommendations on antibiotic use for bloodstream infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci. A significant reduction in antibiotic days of therapy was achieved in the stewardship intervention group that was not seen with rapid diagnostic testing alone.