Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nat Methods ; 15(3): 201-206, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29334379

ABSTRACT

Sequencing the RNA in a biological sample can unlock a wealth of information, including the identity of bacteria and viruses, the nuances of alternative splicing or the transcriptional state of organisms. However, current methods have limitations due to short read lengths and reverse transcription or amplification biases. Here we demonstrate nanopore direct RNA-seq, a highly parallel, real-time, single-molecule method that circumvents reverse transcription or amplification steps. This method yields full-length, strand-specific RNA sequences and enables the direct detection of nucleotide analogs in RNA.


Subject(s)
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Nanopores , RNA, Fungal/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Sequence Analysis, RNA/methods
2.
Mol Phylogenet Evol ; 83: 293-304, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25150787

ABSTRACT

Amoebozoa is a key phylum for eukaryote phylogeny and evolutionary history, but its phylogenetic validity has been questioned since included species are very diverse: amoebo-flagellate slime-moulds, naked and testate amoebae, and some flagellates. 18S rRNA gene trees have not firmly established its internal topology. To rectify this we sequenced cDNA libraries for seven diverse Amoebozoa and conducted phylogenetic analyses for 109 eukaryotes (17-18 Amoebozoa) using 60-188 genes. We conducted Bayesian inferences with the evolutionarily most realistic site-heterogeneous CAT-GTR-Γ model and maximum likelihood analyses. These unequivocally establish the monophyly of Amoebozoa, showing a primary dichotomy between the previously contested subphyla Lobosa and Conosa. Lobosa, the entirely non-flagellate lobose amoebae, are robustly partitioned into the monophyletic classes Tubulinea, with predominantly tube-shaped pseudopodia, and Discosea with flattened cells and different locomotion. Within Conosa 60/70-gene trees with very little missing data show a primary dichotomy between the aerobic infraphylum Semiconosia (Mycetozoa and Variosea) and secondarily anaerobic Archamoebae. These phylogenetic features are entirely congruent with the most recent major amoebozoan classification emphasising locomotion modes, pseudopodial morphology, and ultrastructure. However, 188-gene trees where proportionally more taxa have sparser gene-representation weakly place Archamoebae as sister to Macromycetozoa instead, possibly a tree reconstruction artefact of differentially missing data.


Subject(s)
Amoebozoa/classification , Biological Evolution , Phylogeny , Animals , Bayes Theorem , Gene Library , Likelihood Functions , Models, Genetic , Sequence Analysis, DNA
3.
Mol Phylogenet Evol ; 81: 71-85, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25152275

ABSTRACT

Animals and fungi independently evolved from the protozoan phylum Choanozoa, these three groups constituting a major branch of the eukaryotic evolutionary tree known as opisthokonts. Opisthokonts and the protozoan phylum Amoebozoa (amoebae plus slime moulds) were previously argued to have evolved independently from the little-studied, largely flagellate, protozoan phylum, Sulcozoa. Sulcozoa are a likely evolutionary link between opisthokonts and the more primitive excavate flagellates that have ventral feeding grooves and the most primitive known mitochondria. To extend earlier sparse evidence for the ancestral (paraphyletic) nature of Sulcozoa, we sequenced transcriptomes from six gliding flagellates (two apusomonads; three planomonads; Mantamonas). Phylogenetic analyses of 173-192 genes and 73-122 eukaryote-wide taxa show Sulcozoa as deeply paraphyletic, confirming that opisthokonts and Amoebozoa independently evolved from sulcozoans by losing their ancestral ventral groove and dorsal pellicle: Apusozoa (apusomonads plus anaerobic breviate amoebae) are robustly sisters to opisthokonts and probably paraphyletic, breviates diverging before apusomonads; Varisulca (planomonads, Mantamonas, and non-gliding flagellate Collodictyon) are sisters to opisthokonts plus Apusozoa and Amoebozoa, and possibly holophyletic; Glissodiscea (planomonads, Mantamonas) may be holophyletic, but Mantamonas sometimes groups with Collodictyon instead. Taxon and gene sampling slightly affects tree topology; for the closest branches in Sulcozoa and opisthokonts, proportionally reducing missing data eliminates conflicts between homogeneous-model maximum-likelihood trees and evolutionarily more realistic site-heterogeneous trees. Sulcozoa, opisthokonts, and Amoebozoa constitute an often-pseudopodial 'podiate' clade, one of only three eukaryotic 'supergroups'. Our trees indicate that evolution of sulcozoan dorsal pellicle, ventral pseudopodia, and ciliary gliding (probably simultaneously) generated podiate eukaryotes from Malawimonas-like excavate flagellates.


Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Eukaryota/classification , Phylogeny , Amoebozoa/classification , Amoebozoa/genetics , Animals , Bayes Theorem , Eukaryota/genetics , Fungi/classification , Fungi/genetics , Gene Library , Invertebrates/classification , Invertebrates/genetics , Likelihood Functions , Models, Genetic , Sequence Analysis, DNA
4.
Eur J Protistol ; 49(2): 179-200, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23369787

ABSTRACT

Planomonads are widespread gliding zooflagellates from marine and freshwater sediments with seven species. We cultured 13 new strains; morphology and 18S and ITS2 rDNA sequences show that 11 represent eight new species described here. The 15 species form four robust clades, corresponding to revised Planomonas and Ancyromonas and new genera Fabomonas (marine) and Nutomonas (freshwater). Fabomonas tropica differs in shape and is genetically very distant from previously known planomonads, yet ultrastructurally similar. Anterior cilium morphology maps simply onto the rDNA tree forming the basis for two revised families: Ancyromonadidae (Ancyromonas, Nutomonas) have a uniformly thin, entirely acronematic anterior cilium; Planomonadidae (Fabomonas, Planomonas micra, and new species Planomonas elongata, bulbosa, and brevis) have a more conspicuous emergent basal region of the anterior cilium of normal thickness. ITS2 secondary structure is clade-specific, differing most sharply in the main Nutomonas subclade from all marine species, being exceptionally short compared with earlier-diverging marine clades. Nutomonas longa is very distant but Nutomonas howeae subsp. lacustris differs from Nutomonas (Planomonas) howeae and limna (new combinations) mainly by ITS2 compensatory and/or hemi-compensatory mutations. Ancyromonas indica, atlantica, and kenti are genetically more distinct from Ancyromonas sigmoides (=Planomonas mylnikovi). The first soil planomonad (new Nutomonas limna subspecies) was isolated.


Subject(s)
Eukaryota/classification , Eukaryota/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Phylogeny , Cluster Analysis , DNA, Protozoan/chemistry , DNA, Protozoan/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/chemistry , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal Spacer/chemistry , DNA, Ribosomal Spacer/genetics , Eukaryota/cytology , Genes, rRNA , Microscopy , Molecular Sequence Data , Organelles/ultrastructure , RNA, Protozoan/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 18S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA
5.
Protist ; 162(2): 207-21, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20884290

ABSTRACT

Mantamonasis a novel genus of marine gliding zooflagellates probably related to apusomonad and planomonad Apusozoa. Using phase and differential interference contrast microscopy we describe the type species Mantamonas plasticasp. n. from coastal sediment in Cumbria, England. Cells are ∼5µm long, ∼5µm wide, asymmetric, flattened, biciliate, and somewhat plastic. The posterior cilium, on which they glide smoothly over the substratum, is long and highly acronematic. The much thinner, shorter, and almost immobile anterior cilium points forward to the cell's left. These morphological and behavioural traits suggest thatMantamonasis a member of the protozoan phylum Apusozoa. Analyses of 18S and 28S rRNA gene sequences of Mantamonas plasticaand a second genetically very different marine species from coastal sediment in Tanzania show Mantamonasas a robustly monophyletic clade, that is very divergent from all other eukaryotes. 18S rRNA trees mostly placeMantamonaswithin unikonts (opisthokonts, Apusozoa, and Amoebozoa) but its precise position varies with phylogenetic algorithm and/or taxon and nucleotide position sampling; it may group equally weakly as sister to Planomonadida, Apusomonadida or Breviata. On 28S rRNA and joint 18/28S rRNA phylogenies (including 11 other newly obtained apusozoan/amoebozoan 28S rRNA sequences) it consistently strongly groups with Apusomonadida (Apusozoa).


Subject(s)
Eukaryota/classification , Eukaryota/isolation & purification , Phylogeny , Seawater/parasitology , DNA, Protozoan/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Eukaryota/genetics , Eukaryota/growth & development , Molecular Sequence Data , RNA, Ribosomal, 18S/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 28S/genetics
6.
Proc Biol Sci ; 273(1585): 401-7, 2006 Feb 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16615205

ABSTRACT

Hedgehog proteins are important cell-cell signalling proteins utilized during the development of multicellular animals. Members of the hedgehog gene family have not been detected outside the Metazoa, raising unanswered questions about their evolutionary origin. Here we report a highly unusual hedgehog-related gene from a choanoflagellate, a close unicellular relative of the animals. The deduced C-terminal domain, Hoglet-C, is homologous to the autocatalytic domain of Hedgehog proteins and is predicted to function in autocatalytic cleavage of the precursor peptide. In contrast, the N-terminal Hoglet-N peptide has no similarity to the signalling peptide of Hedgehog (Hh-N). Instead, Hoglet-N is deduced to be a secreted protein with an enormous threonine-rich domain of unprecedented size and purity (over 200 threonine residues) and two polysaccharide-binding domains. Structural modelling reveals that these domains have a novel combination of features found in cellulose-binding domains (CBD) of types IIa and IIb, and are expected to bind cellulose. We propose that the two CBD domains enable Hoglet-N to bind to plant matter, tethering an amorphous nucleophilic anchor, facilitating transient adhesion of the choanoflagellate cell. Since Hh-C and Hoglet-C are homologous, but Hh-N and Hoglet-N are not, we argue that metazoan hedgehog genes evolved by fusion of two distinct genes.


Subject(s)
Eukaryotic Cells/metabolism , Proteins/metabolism , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Base Sequence , DNA, Protozoan/chemistry , DNA, Protozoan/genetics , Eukaryotic Cells/physiology , Models, Molecular , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , Proteins/genetics , Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique , Sequence Alignment , Sequence Analysis, DNA
7.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 101(43): 15386-91, 2004 Oct 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15494441

ABSTRACT

The use of nucleotide and amino acid sequences allows improved understanding of the timing of evolutionary events of life on earth. Molecular estimates of divergence times are, however, controversial and are generally much more ancient than suggested by the fossil record. The limited number of genes and species explored and pervasive variations in evolutionary rates are the most likely sources of such discrepancies. Here we compared concatenated amino acid sequences of 129 proteins from 36 eukaryotes to determine the divergence times of several major clades, including animals, fungi, plants, and various protists. Due to significant variations in their evolutionary rates, and to handle the uncertainty of the fossil record, we used a Bayesian relaxed molecular clock simultaneously calibrated by six paleontological constraints. We show that, according to 95% credibility intervals, the eukaryotic kingdoms diversified 950-1,259 million years ago (Mya), animals diverged from choanoflagellates 761-957 Mya, and the debated age of the split between protostomes and deuterostomes occurred 642-761 Mya. The divergence times appeared to be robust with respect to prior assumptions and paleontological calibrations. Interestingly, these relaxed clock time estimates are much more recent than those obtained under the assumption of a global molecular clock, yet bilaterian diversification appears to be approximately 100 million years more ancient than the Cambrian boundary.


Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Fossils , Animals , Likelihood Functions
8.
Mol Biol Evol ; 21(9): 1740-52, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15175415

ABSTRACT

Resolving the relationships between Metazoa and other eukaryotic groups as well as between metazoan phyla is central to the understanding of the origin and evolution of animals. The current view is based on limited data sets, either a single gene with many species (e.g., ribosomal RNA) or many genes but with only a few species. Because a reliable phylogenetic inference simultaneously requires numerous genes and numerous species, we assembled a very large data set containing 129 orthologous proteins ( approximately 30,000 aligned amino acid positions) for 36 eukaryotic species. Included in the alignments are data from the choanoflagellate Monosiga ovata, obtained through the sequencing of about 1,000 cDNAs. We provide conclusive support for choanoflagellates as the closest relative of animals and for fungi as the second closest. The monophyly of Plantae and chromalveolates was recovered but without strong statistical support. Within animals, in contrast to the monophyly of Coelomata observed in several recent large-scale analyses, we recovered a paraphyletic Coelamata, with nematodes and platyhelminths nested within. To include a diverse sample of organisms, data from EST projects were used for several species, resulting in a large amount of missing data in our alignment (about 25%). By using different approaches, we verify that the inferred phylogeny is not sensitive to these missing data. Therefore, this large data set provides a reliable phylogenetic framework for studying eukaryotic and animal evolution and will be easily extendable when large amounts of sequence information become available from a broader taxonomic range.


Subject(s)
Genomics/statistics & numerical data , Phylogeny , Sequence Alignment/statistics & numerical data , Animals , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Eukaryotic Cells , Expressed Sequence Tags , Fungal Proteins/genetics , Fungi/genetics , Likelihood Functions , Molecular Sequence Data , Proteins/genetics , Ribosomal Proteins/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...