ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of a required emergency medicine (EM) experience embedded in a new community-based longitudinal integrated clerkship (LIC) for participating students and faculty. METHODS: We developed and implemented a community-based LIC EM experience. The experience included 10 clinical shifts, one emergency medical services prehospital care shift, four didactic sessions, one reflection, and an emergency medicine simulation session. Students' outcomes were assessed using end-of-year surveys, focus groups, an emergency medicine subject examination, simulation performance, and clinical evaluations of the students by faculty. Faculty were recruited, underwent faculty development, and were evaluated by students. Faculty perceptions were gathered from a focus group and faculty retention rates were collected. RESULTS: Three cohorts of LIC students (total N = 61) have completed their core emergency medicine experience in our community-based LIC. Among students, 76% to 95% rated the overall quality of teaching as very good or excellent and 66% to 100% rated the quality of learning in their community-based setting as very good or excellent. All students who passed the EM subject examination achieved the clinical competencies of the experience based on clinical evaluations. Among faculty, we have retained greater than 95% each year and they have reflected positively on their precepting experience. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a required EM experience within a community-based LIC model can be an effective learning experience for students and perceived positively by community-based faculty. This model may offer an opportunity to expand clinical learning experiences in EM.
ABSTRACT
Background: Literature describing the effectiveness of teaching strategies in the clinical setting is limited. This realist synthesis review focuses on understanding the effectiveness of teaching strategies used in the clinical setting.Methods: We searched ten databases for English language publications between 1 January 1970 and 31 May 2017 reporting effective teaching strategies, used in a clinical setting, of non-procedural skills. After screening, we used consensus to determine inclusion and employed a standardised instrument to capture study populations, methodology, and outcomes. We summarised what strategies worked, for whom, and in what settings.Results: The initial search netted 53,642 references after de-duplication; 2037 were retained after title and abstract review. Full text review was done on 82 references, with ultimate inclusion of 25 publications. Three specific teaching strategies demonstrated impact on educational outcomes: the One Minute Preceptor (OMP), SNAPPS, and concept mapping. Most of the literature involves physician trainees in an ambulatory environment. All three have been shown to improve skills in the domains of medical knowledge and clinical reasoning.Discussion/conclusions: Apart from the OMP, SNAPPS, and concept mapping, which target the formation of clinical knowledge and reasoning skills, the literature establishing effective teaching strategies in the clinical setting is sparse.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Health Personnel , Health Personnel/education , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is an incomplete understanding of the most effective approaches for motivating residents to adopt guideline-recommended practices for hospital discharges. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated internal medicine (IM) residents' exposure to educational experiences focused on facilitating hospital discharges and compared those experiences based on correlations with residents' perceived responsibility for safely transitioning patients from the hospital. METHODS: A cross-sectional, multi-center survey of IM residents at 9 US university- and community-based training programs in 2014-2015 measured exposure to 8 transitional care experiences, their perceived impact on care transitions attitudes, and the correlation between experiences and residents' perceptions of postdischarge responsibility. RESULTS: Of 817 residents surveyed, 469 (57%) responded. Teaching about care transitions on rounds was the most common educational experience reported by residents (74%, 327 of 439). Learning opportunities with postdischarge patient contact were less common (clinic visits: 32%, 142 of 439; telephone calls: 12%, 53 of 439; and home visits: 4%, 18 of 439). On a 1-10 scale (10 = highest impact), residents rated postdischarge clinic as having the highest impact on their motivation to ensure safe transitions of care (mean = 7.61). Prior experiences with a postdischarge clinic visit, home visit, or telephone call were each correlated with increased perceived responsibility for transitional care tasks (correlation coefficients 0.12 [P = .004], 0.1 [P = .012], and 0.13 [P = 001], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: IM residents learn to facilitate hospital discharges most often through direct patient care. Opportunities to interact with patients across the postdischarge continuum are uncommon, despite correlating with increased perceived responsibility for ensuring safe transitions of care.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency , Patient Discharge , Physicians/psychology , Problem-Based Learning , Ambulatory Care , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Patient Safety , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Interdisciplinary rounds provide a valuable venue for delivering patient-centered care but are difficult to implement due to time constraints and coordination challenges. In this article, we describe a unique model for fostering a culture of bedside interdisciplinary rounds through adjustment of the morning medication administration time, auditing physician communication with nurses, and displaying physician performance in public areas. Implementation of this model led to measurable improvements in physician-to-nurse communication on rounds, teamwork climate, and provider job satisfaction.
Subject(s)
Communication , Interprofessional Relations , Medical Staff, Hospital/education , Medication Adherence/psychology , Patient Care Team , Teaching Rounds/methods , Attitude of Health Personnel , Education, Medical, Graduate , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Patient-Centered Care/methodsABSTRACT
AIM: To examine differences in the types of teaching activities performed during rounds between the most effective and least effective inpatient teaching attendings. METHODS: Participants included 56 attending physicians supervising 279 trainees. Trained observers accompanied teams during rounds and recorded the frequencies of educational activities that occurred. Students and residents then rated their satisfaction with the teaching on rounds. RESULTS: Attending physicians with the highest learner satisfaction scores performed significantly more teaching activities per patient than attending physicians who were rated as average or less-effective (2.1 vs. 1.4 vs. 1.5; p = .03). There were significant differences in the frequencies of 3 out of the 9 specific teaching activities observed, including answering specific patient-care related questions (77% vs. 66% vs. 47%; p = .003), teaching on learner chosen topics (8% vs. 2% vs. 2%; p = .02), and providing feedback (31% vs. 10% vs. 0.1%; p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Specific categories of teaching activities-patient-specific teaching, teaching on learner-identified topics, and providing real-time feedback-are performed more frequently by the highest-rated attending physicians, which can guide faculty development.
Subject(s)
Internal Medicine/education , Medical Staff, Hospital/standards , Teaching Rounds/organization & administration , Teaching/standards , Attitude of Health Personnel , Behavior , Cross-Sectional Studies , Formative Feedback , Humans , Learning , Teaching Rounds/standardsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Medical residents are routinely entrusted with transitions of care, yet little is known about the duration or content of their perceived responsibility for patients they discharge from the hospital. OBJECTIVE: To examine the duration and content of internal medicine residents' perceived responsibility for patients they discharge from the hospital. The secondary objective was to determine whether specific individual experiences and characteristics correlate with perceived responsibility. DESIGN: Multi-site, cross-sectional 24-question survey delivered via email or paper-based form. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine residents (post-graduate years 1-3) at nine university and community-based internal medicine training programs in the United States. MAIN MEASURES: Perceived responsibility for patients after discharge as measured by a previously developed single-item tool for duration of responsibility and novel domain-specific questions assessing attitudes towards specific transition of care behaviors. KEY RESULTS: Of 817 residents surveyed, 469 responded (57.4 %). One quarter of residents (26.1 %) indicated that their responsibility for patients ended at discharge, while 19.3 % reported perceived responsibility extending beyond 2 weeks. Perceived duration of responsibility did not correlate with level of training (P = 0.57), program type (P = 0.28), career path (P = 0.12), or presence of burnout (P = 0.59). The majority of residents indicated they were responsible for six of eight transitional care tasks (85.1-99.3 % strongly agree or agree). Approximately half of residents (57 %) indicated that it was their responsibility to directly contact patients' primary care providers at discharge. and 21.6 % indicated that it was their responsibility to ensure that patients attended their follow-up appointments. CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine residents demonstrate variability in perceived duration of responsibility for recently discharged patients. Neither the duration nor the content of residents' perceived responsibility was consistently associated with level of training, program type, career path, or burnout, suggesting there may be unmeasured factors such as professional role modeling that shape these perceptions.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Internal Medicine/trends , Internship and Residency/trends , Patient Discharge/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Internal Medicine/methods , Internship and Residency/methods , Male , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: General medicine rounds by attending physicians provide the foundation for patient care and education in teaching hospitals. However, the detailed activities of these rounds in the current era are not well characterized. OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of attending rounds for internal medicine inpatients in a large teaching hospital system. DESIGN: A cross-sectional observational study of attending rounds in internal medicine. Rounds were observed directly by research assistants. SETTING: Four teaching hospitals associated with a large public medical school. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six attending physicians and 279 trainees treating 807 general medicine inpatients. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Duration and location of rounds, composition of teams, and frequency of 19 potential activities during rounds. RESULTS: We observed 90 days of rounds. A typical rounding day consisted of 1 attending with 3 trainees visiting a median of 9 (range, 2-18 [SD, 2.9]) patients for a median of 2.0 hours (range, 25-241 [SD, 2.7] minutes). On rounds, teams most frequently discussed the patient care plan (96.7% of patients), reviewed diagnostic studies (90.7%), communicated with patients (73.4%), and discussed the medication list (68.8%). Teams infrequently discussed invasive lines or tubes (9.3%) or nursing notes (6.2%) and rarely communicated with nurses (12.0%) or taught physical examination skills (14.6%), evidence-based medicine topics (7.2%), or learner-identified topics (3.2%). Many commonly performed activities occurred infrequently at the bedside. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Most activities on attending rounds do not take place at the bedside. The teams discuss patient care plans and test results most of the time but fail to include many items that may be of significant value, including specific aspects of patient care, interprofessional communication, and learner-centered education. Future studies are needed to further assess the implications of these observations.
Subject(s)
Inpatients , Internal Medicine/education , Medical Staff, Hospital/education , Patient Care Team/standards , Quality of Health Care , Teaching Rounds/standards , Colorado , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Physician-Nurse Relations , Teaching Rounds/trendsABSTRACT
Clinician educators and medical trainees face intense pressure to complete numerous patient care and teaching activities in a limited amount of time. To address the need for effective and efficient teaching methods for use in the inpatient setting, the authors used constructivist learning theory, the principles of adult learning, and their expertise as clinician educators to develop the MiPLAN model for bedside teaching. This three-part model is designed to enable clinical teachers to simultaneously provide care to patients while assessing learners, determining high-yield teaching topics, and providing feedback to learners.The "M" refers to a preparatory meeting between teacher and learners before engaging in patient care or educational activities. During this meeting, team members should become acquainted and the teacher should set goals and clarify expectations. The "i" refers to five behaviors for the teacher to adopt during learners' bedside presentations: introduction, in the moment, inspection, interruptions, and independent thought. "PLAN" is an algorithm to establish priorities for teaching subsequent to a learner's presentation: patient care, learners' questions, attending's agenda, and next steps.The authors suggest that the MiPLAN model can help clinical teachers gain more confidence in their ability to teach at the bedside and increase the frequency and quality of bedside teaching. They propose further research to assess the generalizability of this model to other institutions, settings, and specialties and to evaluate educational and patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers , Models, Educational , Teaching Rounds/methods , Algorithms , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Learning , Physician-Patient Relations , Students, Medical/psychology , United StatesSubject(s)
Decision Making , Diagnostic Imaging/adverse effects , Physician-Patient Relations , Adult , Communication , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is the standard test used in clinical practice to detect peripheral artery disease (PAD) and is a powerful predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This study sought to measure the baseline knowledge of the ABI test among a sample of internal medicine residents and to examine the impact of an educational intervention on performance of the test. A total of 29 residents were asked to perform three tasks, with the performance of each task being assessed using a point-based scoring system: measure an ABI on a normal volunteer (15 points), calculate the ABI based on data from a hypothetical patient (3 points), and interpret a range of ABI values (6 points). A standardized educational intervention was then provided and post-education performance was assessed for each task using the same scoring system. At baseline, 4% of residents correctly measured the ABI, 10% correctly calculated the ABI, and 45% correctly interpreted the ABI. Baseline performance was unaffected by year of residency training. Following the educational intervention, 50% of residents correctly measured the ABI, 75% correctly calculated the ABI, and 88% correctly interpreted the ABI. The mean score for the tasks of ABI measurement, calculation and interpretation between baseline and post-education were 4.6 +/- 3 and 13.9 +/- 1.6 (p < 0.0001), 1 +/- 0.9 and 2.3 +/- 1.2 (p = 0.002), and 4.9 +/- 1.6 and 5.9 +/- 0.3 (p = 0.008), respectively. In conclusion, baseline knowledge of the ABI test was poor among a sample of internal medicine residents. These results suggest that instruction regarding the ABI test is deficient in medical school and residency programs and requires action by those responsible for the education of medical students and residents.
Subject(s)
Ankle Brachial Index/standards , Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency/standards , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Ankle Brachial Index/instrumentation , Ankle Brachial Index/methods , Competency-Based Education , Humans , United StatesSubject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Hospitalists , Inservice Training , Stroke , Hospitalists/education , Humans , Neurology , Stroke/physiopathology , Stroke/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Chemotherapy-induced cell death is linked to apoptosis, and there is increasing evidence that multidrug-resistance in cancer cells may be the result of a decrease in the ability of a cell to initiate apoptosis in response to cytotoxic agents. In previous studies, we synthesized two classes of electrophilic tocopheryl quinones (TQ), nonarylating alpha-TQ and arylating gamma- and delta-TQ, and found that gamma- and delta-TQ, but not alpha-TQ, were highly cytotoxic in human acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells (CEM) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) CEM/VLB100. We have now extended these studies on tumor biology with CEM, HL60 and MDR HL60/MX2 human promyelocytic leukemia, U937 human monocytic leukemia, and ZR-75-1 breast adenocarcinoma cells. gamma-TQ, but not alpha-TQ or tocopherols, showed concentration and incubation time-dependent effects on loss of plasma membrane integrity, diminished viable cell number, and stimulation of apoptosis. Its cytotoxicity exceeded that of doxorubicin in HL60/MX2 cells, which express MRP, an MDR-associated protein. Apoptosis was confirmed by TEM, TUNEL, and DNA gel electrophoresis. Kinetic studies showed that an induction period was required to initiate an irreversible multiphase process. Gamma-TQ released mitochondrial cytochrome c to the cytosol, induced the cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase, and depleted intracellular glutathione. Unlike xenobiotic electrophiles, gamma-TQ is a highly cytotoxic arylating electrophile that stimulates apoptosis in several cancer cell lines including cells that express MDR through both P-glycoprotein and MRP-associated proteins. The biological properties of arylating TQ electrophiles are closely associated with cytotoxicity and may contribute to other biological effects of these highly active agents.