Complications and survival following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is considered a safe and effective method for nutritional support in patients with malnutrition and swallowing impairment with an estimated survival of over two months. Some indications, such as advanced cognitive decline, contraindicate the technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent PEG placement between January 2001 and May 2019 were included. Clinical data, indication, complications, and mortality were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 648 patients (46.5% male, mean age 70±18.5 years) were included. The most common indications for PEG were advanced cognitive decline (31.5%) and cerebrovascular disease (18.8%). The mean follow-up was 12.07 months (IQR 3.27-34.73). 39.5% of patients experienced complications (systemic 17.9%, local 28.5%). The most frequent were bronchoaspiration (9.7%) and rupture/dysfunction (13.9%), respectively. The presence of early complications (HR 1.63 [1.20-2.21]) and age (HR 1.02 [1.01-1.02]) were associated with shorter survival time, while female sex was a protective factor (HR 0.78 [0.66-0.94]). CONCLUSIONS: PEG is not without complications, with 39.5% of patients experiencing them. Patients with advanced dementia, male sex, older age, and systemic complications have lower survival following PEG placement.

Impact of mesalazine on the response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Results of a prospective multicentre study of GETECCU (VACOVEII study). / Impacto de la mesalazina en la respuesta a la vacunación contra la COVID-19 en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Resultados de un estudio prospectivo multicéntrico de GETECCU (VACOVEII).

OBJECTIVE: The recommendations of the Spanish Ministry of Health on vaccination in risk groups include mesalazine among the treatments with a possible negative effect on its effectiveness. However, this is not the recommendation of most experts. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of mesalazine on the humoral response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: VACOVEII is a Spanish, prospective, multicenter study promoted by GETECCU, which evaluates the effectiveness of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with IBD. This study includes IBD patients who have recieved the full vaccination schedule and without previous COVID-19 infection. Seroconversion was set at 260BAU/mL (centralized determination) and was assessed 6 months after full vaccination. In this subanalysis of the study, we compare the effectiveness of the vaccine between patients treated with mesalazine and patients without treatment. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients without immunosuppressive therapy were included, of which 32 did not receive any treatment and 92 received only mesalazine. Six months after full vaccination, no significant differences are observed in the mean concentrations of IgG anti-S between both groups. In the multivariate analysis, antibody titers were independently associated with the use of mRNA vaccines and with SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSION: Mesalazine does not have a negative effect on the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in IBD patients.

A booster dose of SARS-COV-2 vaccine improves suboptimal seroconversion rates in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Results of a prospective multicenter study of GETECCU (VACOVEII study).

BACKGROUND: The response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination decreases in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, specially under anti-TNF treatment. However, data on medium-term effectiveness are limited, specially using new recommended seroconversion rate (>260BAU/mL). Our aim was to evaluate the 6-month>260 BAU-seroconversion rate after full vaccination and after booster-dose. METHODS: VACOVEII is a Spanish multicenter, prospective study promoted by GETECCU. IBD patients full vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and without previous COVID-19 infection, treated or not with immunosuppressants, were included. The booster dose was administered 6 months after the full vaccination. Seroconversion was set at 260BAU/mL, according to most recent recommendations and was assessed 6 months after the full vaccination and 6 months after booster-dose. RESULTS: Between October 2021 and March 2022, 313 patients were included (124 no treatment or mesalazine; 55 immunomodulators; 87 anti-TNF; 19 anti-integrin; and 28 ustekinumab). Most patients received mRNA-vaccines (86%). Six months after full vaccination, overall seroconversion rate was 44.1%, being significantly lower among patients on anti-TNF (19.5%, p<0.001) and ustekinumab (35.7%, p=0.031). The seroconversion rate after booster was 92%. Again, anti-TNF patients had a significantly lower seroconversion rate (67%, p<0.001). mRNA-vaccine improved seroconversion rate (OR 11.720 [95% CI 2.26-60.512]). CONCLUSION: The full vaccination regimen achieves suboptimal response in IBD patients, specially among those anti-TNF or ustekinumab. The booster dose improves seroconversion rate in all patients, although it remains limited in those treated with anti-TNF. These results reinforce the need to prioritize future booster doses in patients on immunosuppressants therapy, specially under anti-TNF, and using mRNA-vaccines.

HLA-DQA1*05 Was Not Associated With Primary Nonresponse or Loss of Response to First Anti-TNF in Real-World Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: We lack predictors of response to biologics in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A recent study has shown a significant association between HLA-DQA1*05 carriers and the development of loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) mediated by immunogenicity. METHODS: Retrospective single-center cohort study including IBD patients who had received anti-TNF therapy as a first biologic and whose HLA-DQA1*05 had been determined. Primary nonresponse and secondary failure (assessed by survival analysis) have been evaluated as well as safety outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 199 IBD patients (161 [81%] with Crohn's disease and 38 [19%] with ulcerative colitis) were included. A total of 42.4% were HLA-DQA1*05 carriers and 60% received combination therapy at the start of anti-TNF treatment. Median follow-up was 24 (interquartile range, 11-66) months. No statistically significant differences were found in primary nonresponse to anti-TNF (89.3% vs 87.8%; P = .825), depending on HLA carriers and noncarriers. No differences in secondary loss of response according to HLA variant in any of the analyses performed (full cohort, according to IBD or anti-TNF type) were observed. Again, no differences were observed in patients treated with combination therapy. In terms of safety, no significant differences were found in the rate of infusion reactions or serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: In our real-life cohort of IBD patients treated for the first time with anti-TNF, being an HLA-DQA1*05 carrier did not act as a predictor of response failure, either primary or secondary. The safety of anti-TNF treatment has also not been influenced by the variant.

The HLA variant DQA1*05 has been identified as a risk factor for the development of antibodies to anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs. We observed that its presence has no impact on clinical outcomes, such as secondary loss of response. These data suggest that caution is required before making decisions based on this HLA variant.

Real-World Evidence of Tofacinitib in Ulcerative Colitis: Short-Term and Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the durability, short-term and long-term effectiveness, and safety of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis (UC) in clinical practice. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study including patients with UC who had received the first tofacitinib dose at least 8 weeks before the inclusion. Clinical effectiveness was based on partial Mayo score. RESULTS: A total of 408 patients were included. Of them, 184 (45%) withdrew tofacitinib during follow-up (mean = 18 months). The probability of maintaining tofacitinib was 67% at 6 m, 58% at 12 m, and 49% at 24 m. The main reason for tofacitinib withdrawal was primary nonresponse (44%). Older age at the start of tofacitinib and a higher severity of clinical activity were associated with tofacitinib withdrawal. The proportion of patients in remission was 38% at week 4, 45% at week 8, and 47% at week 16. Having moderate-to-severe vs mild disease activity at baseline and older age at tofacitinib start were associated with a lower and higher likelihood of remission at week 8, respectively. Of 171 patients in remission at week 8, 83 (49%) relapsed. The probability of maintaining response was 66% at 6 m and 54% at 12 m. There were 93 adverse events related to tofacitinib treatment (including 2 pulmonary thromboembolisms [in patients with risk factors] and 2 peripheral vascular thrombosis), and 29 led to tofacitinib discontinuation. DISCUSSION: Tofacitinib is effective in both short-term and long-term in patients with UC. The safety profile is similar to that previously reported.

Traducción al español y validación de un cuestionario breve de medida del control de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal desde la perspectiva del paciente: IBD-Control, EII-Control / Translation into Spanish and validation of a short questionnaire to measure the control of inflammatory bowel disease from the patient's perspective: IBD-Control, EII-Control

Objetivo: La medida de los resultados percibidos por el paciente en la asistencia de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) adquiere cada vez más importancia. Existe una herramienta sencilla y validada en inglés para este fin: el «IBD-Control». Nuestro objetivo es traducirlo al español, adaptarlo y validarlo.Pacientes y métodos: Se tradujo el IBD-Control, generando el instrumento en español «EII-Control», y se validó prospectivamente. Los pacientes cumplimentaban el EII-Control y otros cuestionarios que servían de comparadores de referencia. El gastroenterólogo realizaba una valoración global de la enfermedad, calculaba índices de actividad y registraba el tratamiento. Un subgrupo de pacientes repitió toda la valoración en una segunda visita. Se analizó también la utilidad de escalas resumidas del EII-Control (el EII-Control-8 y el EII-Control-EVA). Resultados: Se incluyeron 249 pacientes con EII (101 repitieron la segunda visita). Estándares psicométricos del test: consistencia interna: α de Cronbach para EII-Control 0,83 con fuerte correlación entre EII-Control-8 y EII-Control-EVA (r=0,5); reproducibilidad: correlación intraclase 0,70 para EII-Control; validez de constructo: correlaciones de moderadas a fuertes entre EII-Control, EII-Control-8 y EII-Control-EVA frente a comparadores; validez discriminante: p <0,001; sensibilidad al cambio: misma respuesta que índice de calidad de vida. Sensibilidad y especificidad en el punto de corte 14 de 0,696 y 0,903, respectivamente, para determinar el estado quiescente. Conclusiones: El EII-Control es un instrumento válido para medir el control de la EII desde la perspectiva del paciente en nuestro medio y cultura. Su simplicidad lo convierte en una herramienta útil para apoyar la asistencia.(AU)

Objective: Measurement of patient-perceived outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care is becoming increasingly important. A simple and validated tool exists in English for this purpose, the “IBD-Control”. Our aim is to translate it into Spanish, adapt and validate it. Patients and methods: The IBD-Control was translated into the Spanish instrument “EII-Control” and prospectively validated. Patients completed the EII-Control and other questionnaires that served as baseline comparators. The gastroenterologist performed a global assessment of the disease, calculated activity indices and recorded treatment. A subgroup of patients repeated the entire assessment at a second visit. The usefulness of IBD-Control summary scales (IBD-Control-8 and IBD-Control-VAS) was also analysed. Results: A total of 249 IBD patients were included (101 repeated the second visit). Psychometric standards of the test: internal consistency: Cronbach's α for EII-Control 0.83 with strong correlation between EII-Control-8 and EII-Control-EVA (r=0.5); reproducibility: intra-class correlation 0.70 for EII-Control; construct validity: moderate to strong correlations between IBD-Control, IBD-Control-8 and IBD-Control-VAS versus comparators; discriminant validity: P<.001; sensitivity to change: same response as quality of life index. Sensitivity and specificity at cut-off point 14 of 0.696 and 0.903, respectively, to determine quiescent status. Conclusions: The IBD-Control is a valid instrument to measure IBD-Control from the patient's perspective in our environment and culture. Its simplicity makes it a useful tool to support care.(AU)

Translation into Spanish and validation of a short questionnaire to measure the control of inflammatory bowel disease from the patient's perspective: IBD-Control, EII-Control. / Traducción al español y validación de un cuestionario breve de medida del control de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal desde la perspectiva del paciente: IBD-Control, EII-Control.

OBJECTIVE: Measurement of patient-perceived outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care is becoming increasingly important. A simple and validated tool exists in English for this purpose, the "IBD-Control". Our aim is to translate it into Spanish, adapt and validate it. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The IBD-Control was translated into the Spanish instrument "EII-Control" and prospectively validated. Patients completed the EII-Control and other questionnaires that served as baseline comparators. The gastroenterologist performed a global assessment of the disease, calculated activity indices and recorded treatment. A subgroup of patients repeated the entire assessment at a second visit. The usefulness of IBD-Control summary scales (IBD-Control-8 and IBD-Control-VAS) was also analysed. RESULTS: A total of 249 IBD patients were included (101 repeated the second visit). Psychometric standards of the test: internal consistency: Cronbach's α for EII-Control 0.83 with strong correlation between EII-Control-8 and EII-Control-EVA (r=0.5); reproducibility: intra-class correlation 0.70 for EII-Control; construct validity: moderate to strong correlations between IBD-Control, IBD-Control-8 and IBD-Control-VAS versus comparators; discriminant validity: P<.001; sensitivity to change: same response as quality of life index. Sensitivity and specificity at cut-off point 14 of 0.696 and 0.903, respectively, to determine quiescent status. CONCLUSIONS: The IBD-Control is a valid instrument to measure IBD-Control from the patient's perspective in our environment and culture. Its simplicity makes it a useful tool to support care.

Eficacia y seguridad de ustekinumab en la práctica clínica real. Estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo. Cohorte ARAINF / Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in real clinical practice. Retrospective multicentre study. ARAINF cohort

INTRODUCCIÓN: Ustekinumab, anticuerpo monoclonal que bloquea las interleucinas 12/23, ha demostrado en ensayos clínicos su eficacia para inducir y mantener la remisión clínica en la enfermedad de Crohn (EC). Su efectividad y su seguridad en la práctica clínica real es menos conocida y podría diferir respecto a los ensayos. OBJETIVO: Evaluar en la práctica clínica su efectividad y seguridad (pauta de inducción intravenosa esencialmente), como inducción y a largo plazo, en pacientes con EC refractarios a tratamiento biológico. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Análisis retrospectivo multicéntrico (6 hospitales aragoneses), que incluye a todos los pacientes (N=69) con EC en tratamiento con ustekinumab (fuese con inducción intravenosa o subcutánea) que hubiesen alcanzado al menos 16 semanas de seguimiento. La respuesta o remisión clínica se ha evaluado en las semanas 16, 24, 32 y 48 mediante el índice de Harvey-Bradshaw. RESULTADOS: Se han incluido un total de 69 pacientes, edad media 42 años, 54% hombres. Un 89,86% (IC 95% [0,805, 0,949]) de los pacientes ha presentado mejoría clínica en la semana 16 (15,95% remisión, 73,92% respuesta). En el seguimiento posterior dicha respuesta se ha mantenido. Se han identificado mediante un modelo de regresión ordinal la edad (OR 0,95, p = 0.028) y el hábito tabáquico (OR 0,19, p = 0,027) como predictores de mala respuesta al tratamiento, mientras que la necesidad de cambio de biológico por efecto adverso (OR 96, p = 0,00017) y por pérdida de respuesta secundaria (OR 7,07, p = 0,034) han sido factores predictores de buena respuesta. No se han reportado efectos adversos graves que obligasen a interrumpir el tratamiento con ustekinumab. CONCLUSIÓN: Ustekinumab es efectivo y seguro en la práctica clínica real para lograr la inducción y el mantenimiento de la respuesta en pacientes con EC refractaria. El tabaco y la edad han mostrado ser predictores de mala respuesta, mientras que la indicación por efecto adverso a biológico previo y por pérdida de respuesta secundaria han mostrado ser predictores de buena respuesta

INTRODUCTION: Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks interleukins 12/23, has proven in clinical trials its efficacy in inducing and maintaining clinical remission of Crohn's disease (CD). Its effectiveness and safety in actual clinical practice is less known and may differ from trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate its effectiveness and safety in clinical practice (intravenous induction pattern essentially), such as induction and over the long term, in patients with CD refractory to biological treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicentre retrospective analysis (6 hospitals in Aragón), which includes all patients (N=69) with CD undergoing treatment with ustekinumab (either with intravenous or subcutaneous induction), who had at least 16 weeks of follow-up. The clinical response or remission has been evaluated at weeks 16, 24, 32 and 48 using the Harvey-Bradshaw index. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients have been included, mean age 42 years, 54% men. A percentage of 89.86 (95% CI [0.805, 0.949]) of the patients presented clinical improvement at week 16 (15.95% remission, 73.92% response). In the subsequent follow-up, this response has been maintained. Age (OR 0.95, P=.028) and smoking habits (OR 0.19, P=.027) have been identified by an ordinal regression model as predictors of poor treatment response while the need for biological change due to adverse effect (OR 96, P=.00017) and due to loss of secondary response (OR 7.07, P=.034) have been predictors of good response. No serious adverse effects have been reported that forced them to stop taking ustekinumab. CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab is effective and safe in real clinical practice to achieve induction and maintenance of the response in patients with refractory CD. Tobacco and age have been shown to be predictors of poor response, while the indication for adverse effect to previous biological and for loss of secondary response has been shown to be predictors of good response

Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in real clinical practice. Retrospective multicentre study. ARAINF cohort. / Eficacia y seguridad de ustekinumab en la práctica clínica real. Estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo. Cohorte ARAINF.

INTRODUCTION: Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks interleukins 12/23, has proven in clinical trials its efficacy in inducing and maintaining clinical remission of Crohn's disease (CD). Its effectiveness and safety in actual clinical practice is less known and may differ from trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate its effectiveness and safety in clinical practice (intravenous induction pattern essentially), such as induction and over the long term, in patients with CD refractory to biological treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicentre retrospective analysis (6 hospitals in Aragón), which includes all patients (N=69) with CD undergoing treatment with ustekinumab (either with intravenous or subcutaneous induction), who had at least 16 weeks of follow-up. The clinical response or remission has been evaluated at weeks 16, 24, 32 and 48 using the Harvey-Bradshaw index. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients have been included, mean age 42 years, 54% men. A percentage of 89.86 (95% CI [0.805, 0.949]) of the patients presented clinical improvement at week 16 (15.95% remission, 73.92% response). In the subsequent follow-up, this response has been maintained. Age (OR 0.95, P=.028) and smoking habits (OR 0.19, P=.027) have been identified by an ordinal regression model as predictors of poor treatment response while the need for biological change due to adverse effect (OR 96, P=.00017) and due to loss of secondary response (OR 7.07, P=.034) have been predictors of good response. No serious adverse effects have been reported that forced them to stop taking ustekinumab. CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab is effective and safe in real clinical practice to achieve induction and maintenance of the response in patients with refractory CD. Tobacco and age have been shown to be predictors of poor response, while the indication for adverse effect to previous biological and for loss of secondary response has been shown to be predictors of good response.