Clinical benefits and economic cost-savings of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention.

AIMS: Assess the clinical benefits and associated direct and indirect cost-savings from Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention. METHODS: REN, a prescribed, wearable, FDA-cleared neuromodulation-device for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine, recently demonstrated efficacy for migraine prevention when used every-other-day, in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study. Following baseline (4-weeks), subjects underwent treatment with REN or placebo (8-weeks), and electronically reported migraine symptoms and acute treatments daily. Therapeutic-gain was the between-groups difference (REN minus placebo) in change from baseline to the second month of intervention. Health-economics impact was derived as cost-savings associated with REN's clinical benefits. RESULTS: Out of 248 subjects randomized (128 active, 120 placebo), 179 (95:84) qualified for modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Significant therapeutic gains favoring REN vs. placebo were found (Tepper et al. 2023), including mean (±SD) reduction in number of acute medication days (3.5 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.5; gain = 2.2; p = .001) and presenteeism days (2.7 ± 0.3 vs. 1.1 ± 0.4; gain = 1.6, p = .001). Mean changes of provider visits (reduction of 0.09 ± 0.1 vs. increase of 0.08 ± 0.2; p = .297), and reduction of absenteeism days (0.07 ± 0.1 vs. 0.07 ± 0.2; p = .997) were not significant. Mean annual cost-saving for one patient using REN for migraine prevention estimated $10,000 (±$1,777) from reductions in these four clinical outcomes relative to baseline without REN treatment. Extrapolated to a hypothetical US commercial health-plan of one-million covered lives, assuming the national prevalence of migraine patients on preventive treatment, annual mean (±SE) cost-saving from using REN migraine prevention estimated $560.0 million (±$99.5 million) from reduction in direct (∼$330 millionm) and indirect costs (∼$230 millionm) measured. LIMITATIONS: Clinical and cost-savings benefits presented are conservative, assessed only from endpoints measured in the clinical trial. Moreover, some of the endpoints had only scarce or no occurrences during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Coverage of the REN-device for migraine prevention may significantly reduce disease-burden and save a one-million-member payer plan at least $560 million per year.

Migraine affects more than 1 billion people worldwide, causing significant disability and substantial clinical economic burden. Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) is a prescribed, wearable, non-pharmacological, non-invasive device (Nerivio), indicated for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 12 years and older. Efficacy of REN for migraine prevention was recently demonstrated in a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical-trial. This study further analyzes clinical benefits from endpoints measured in the clinical-trial as well as their associated direct and indirect costs. Out of 248 subjects randomized (128 active, 120 placebo), 179 (95:84) qualified for modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Significant therapeutic gains favoring REN over placebo were found, including an average reduction of 3.4 acute medication days/month, and an average reduction of 2.7 presenteeism days/month. A reduction in the number of provider visits and absenteeism days was also reported, though not significantly differed from changes in the control group. Mean annual cost-saving from reductions in these four clinical outcomes relative to baseline without REN treatment for a patient using REN for migraine prevention estimated $10,000. Extrapolated to a hypothetical US commercial health-plan of one million covered lives, annual mean cost-saving from using REN for migraine prevention is estimated to be $560.0 million, composed of $327.8 million direct costs and $232.2 million indirect costs. Thus, REN preventive treatment for migraine reduces disease burden and leads to meaningful cost-saving, both direct and indirect, proposing clinical and financial incentives for patients, health insurance systems, and employers to utilize REN for migraine prevention.

Remote electrical neuromodulation for migraine prevention: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical efficacy of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN), used every other day, for the prevention of migraine. BACKGROUND: Preventive treatment is key to managing migraine, but it is often underutilized. REN, a non-pharmacological acute treatment for migraine, was evaluated as a method of migraine prevention in patients with episodic and chronic migraine. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial, with 1:1 ratio. The study consisted of a 4-week baseline observation phase, and an 8-week double-blind intervention phase in which participants used either REN or a placebo stimulation every other day. Throughout the study, participants reported their symptoms daily, via an electronic diary. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-eight participants were randomized (128 active, 120 placebo), of which 179 qualified for the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis (95 active; 84 placebo). REN was superior to placebo in the primary endpoint, change in mean number of migraine days per month from baseline, with mean reduction of 4.0 ± SD of 4.0 days (1.3 ± 4.0 in placebo, therapeutic gain = 2.7 [confidence interval -3.9 to -1.5], p < 0.001). The significance was maintained when analyzing the episodic (-3.2 ± 3.4 vs. -1.0 ± 3.6, p = 0.003) and chronic (-4.7 ± 4.4 vs. -1.6 ± 4.4, p = 0.001) migraine subgroups separately. REN was also superior to placebo in reduction of moderate/severe headache days (3.8 ± 3.9 vs. 2.2 ± 3.6, p = 0.005), reduction of headache days of all severities (4.5 ± 4.1 vs. 1.8 ± 4.6, p < 0.001), percentage of patients achieving 50% reduction in moderate/severe headache days (51.6% [49/95] vs. 35.7% [30/84], p = 0.033), and reduction in days of acute medication intake (3.5 ± 4.1 vs. 1.4 ± 4.3, p = 0.001). Similar results were obtained in the ITT analysis. No serious device-related adverse events were reported in any group. CONCLUSION: Applied every other day, REN is effective and safe for the prevention of migraine.

Effectiveness comparison of remote electrical neuromodulation and standard-care medications for acute treatment of chronic migraine: a post-hoc analysis.

Aim: The current study compared the effectiveness of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) to that of standard-care medications for acute treatments of migraine, using a within-subjects design. Materials & methods: Post-hoc within-subject analysis was performed on data from 78 adult chronic migraine patients who participated in a clinical trial with REN, on four end points: single-treatment pain relief, single-treatment pain freedom, consistency of pain relief and consistency of pain freedom. Results: No statistical differences were found between REN and the tested medications, in any of the effectiveness outcomes: single-treatment pain relief p = 0.056, single-treatment pain freedom p = 0.532, consistency of pain relief p = 0.369, consistency of pain freedom p = 1.00. Conclusion: The results suggest that REN may provide an effective non-pharmacological alternative for standard care abortive medications in individuals impacted by chronic migraine.

Due to the high frequency of headaches, patients impacted by chronic migraine are struggling with poor quality of life, as well as elevated risk of medication overuse headache (which might cause migraine chronification). Thus, there is a need for non-pharmacological migraine treatments that are both effective and well tolerated. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is a non-pharmacological abortive migraine treatment, which is US FDA cleared for adults and adolescents with episodic or chronic migraine. The current study compared the effectiveness of REN to that of standard-care medications (i.e., over-the-counter medications and triptans), using data from 78 individuals with chronic migraine who participated in a clinical trial. During the study, each participant treated their attacks with their preferred medication for the first 4 weeks, and then treated their attacks with REN (only) for the following four weeks. The participants rated their pain level prior to each treatment, and 2 h after the beginning of the treatment. The results indicate no statistical difference between the effectiveness of REN and standard care medications and suggest that REN may provide an effective non-pharmacological alternative for standard care abortive medications, for individuals with chronic migraine.

Safety and efficacy of remote electrical neuromodulation for the acute treatment of chronic migraine: an open-label study.

INTRODUCTION: Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is an acute treatment of migraine. The results from several studies in patients with episodic migraine suggest that REN is an effective and safe acute treatment of migraine. A recent pilot study provided initial support that REN is effective in patients with chronic migraine as well. OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to validate and provide further evidence for the safety and efficacy of REN in a large sample of patients impacted by chronic migraine. METHODS: In this open-label, single-arm study, patients with chronic migraine treated their headaches with the REN device (Nerivio, Theranica Bio-Electronics Ltd, Israel) for 4 weeks. Participants used an electronic diary to record their symptoms at treatment initiation, 2 hours after treatment, and 24 hours after treatment. The primary end point was the percentage of subjects who achieved pain relief at 2 hours posttreatment. Secondary end points included pain freedom and improvement of associated symptoms and functional disability. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six subjects were enrolled into the study, of which 91 subjects had an evaluable treatment with REN. Pain relief and pain disappearance at 2 hours were achieved by 59.3% (54/91) and 20.9% (19/91) of modified intent-to-treat subjects, respectively (with worst-case sensitivity analysis indicating 54.5% and 19.2%, respectively). Sustained pain relief at 24 hours was observed in 64.4% (29/45) of those who achieved pain relief at 2 hours (with worst-case sensitivity analysis indicating 45.6%). The findings of the study show that REN has a favorable effect on nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia and improves functional ability. One device-related adverse event was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Remote electrical neuromodulation treatments results in the relief of migraine headaches and associated symptoms, thus offering a drug-free acute treatment option for people with chronic migraine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04194008.

Remote Electrical Neuromodulation for the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Patients with Chronic Migraine: An Open-Label Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is a novel acute treatment of migraine. Upper arm peripheral nerves are stimulated to induce conditioned pain modulation (CPM)-an endogenous analgesic mechanism in which conditioning stimulation inhibits pain in remote body regions. The REN device (Nerivio®, Theranica Bio-Electronics LTD., Israel) is FDA-authorized for acute treatment of migraine in adults who do not have chronic migraine. The current study assessed the consistency of response over multiple migraine attacks in people with chronic migraine who are typically characterized with severe pain intensity, high disability, and less robust response to triptans. METHODS: This was an open-label, single-arm, dual-center study conducted on adults with chronic migraine. Participants underwent a 4-week treatment phase in which they treated their migraine headaches with the device for 45 min within 1 h of attack onset. Pain levels were recorded at baseline, 2 h, and 24 h post-treatment. Efficacy outcomes (pain relief and pain-free responses at 2 h, sustained pain relief and sustained pain-free responses at 24 h) focused on intra-individual consistency of response across multiple attacks, which was defined as response in at least 50% of the treatments. RESULTS: Forty-two participants were enrolled, and 38 participants were evaluable for analyses; 73.7% (28/38) achieved pain relief at 2 h, 26.3% (10/38) were pain-free at 2 h, 84.4% (27/32) had sustained pain relief response at 24 h and 45.0% (9/20) had sustained pain relief response at 24 h in at least 50% of their treated attacks. The effects of REN on associated symptoms and improvement in function were also consistent. The incidence of device-related adverse events was low (1.8%). CONCLUSIONS: REN used for a series of migraine attacks was effective and well tolerated across attacks. REN may offer a safe and effective non-pharmacological alternative for acute treatment in patients with chronic migraine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04161807. Retrospectively registered on November 13, 2019.

A novel method for coral explant culture and micropropagation.

We describe here a method for the micropropagation of coral that creates progeny from tissue explants derived from a single polyp or colonial corals. Coral tissue explants of various sizes (0.5-2.5 mm in diameter) were manually microdissected from the solitary coral Fungia granulosa. Explants could be maintained in an undeveloped state or induced to develop into polyps by manipulating environmental parameters such as light and temperature regimes, as well as substrate type. Fully developed polyps were able to be maintained for a long-term in a closed sea water system. Further, we demonstrate that mature explants are also amenable to this technique with the micropropagation of second-generation explants and their development into mature polyps. We thereby experimentally have established coral clonal lines that maintain their ability to differentiate without the need for chemical induction or genetic manipulation. The versatility of this method is also demonstrated through its application to two other coral species, the colonial corals Oculina patigonica and Favia favus.