Phase III study of gefitinib compared with intravenous methotrexate for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck [corrected].

PURPOSE: To compare survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated with gefitinib 250 or 500 mg/day or standard methotrexate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred eighty-six patients with recurrent SCCHN were randomly assigned to oral gefitinib 250 mg/day, gefitinib 500 mg/day, or methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly. Primary end point was overall survival, secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), safety, symptom improvement, and quality of life (QOL). Exploratory end points included association of efficacy with epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number and other biomarkers. RESULTS: Neither gefitinib 250 nor 500 mg/day improved overall survival compared with methotrexate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.57; P = .12; and HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.43; P = .39, respectively). In the gefitinib 250 mg/day, 500 mg/day, and methotrexate groups, respectively, median overall survival was 5.6, 6.0, and 6.7 months; ORRs (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) were 2.7%, 7.6% and 3.9%, with no statistically significant difference between either gefitinib arm and methotrexate. No unexpected adverse events were observed, except for tumor hemorrhage-type events with gefitinib (8.9%, gefitinib 250 mg/day; 11.4%, gefitinib 500 mg/day; 1.9%, methotrexate). QOL improvement rates (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head & Neck total score) were 13.4%, 18.0%, and 6.0% for gefitinib 250 mg/day, 500 mg/day, and methotrexate, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN, while responses with gefitinib were seen, neither gefitinib 250 nor 500 mg/day improved overall survival compared with methotrexate. With the exception of tumor hemorrhage-type events with gefitinib, the adverse event profiles were generally consistent with those previously observed.

A phase I study of pemetrexed (ALIMTA) and cyclophosphamide in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pemetrexed and cyclophosphamide combination therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and WHO performance status 0 to 2 were eligible. Pemetrexed (range, 400-2,400 mg/m(2)) was administered on day 1 of a 21-day schedule followed by cyclophosphamide (range, 400-800 mg/m(2)). Folic acid and vitamin B(12) supplementation began 1 to 2 weeks before the first pemetrexed dose. RESULTS: Fifty-seven pretreated patients were enrolled and received 342 cycles (median, 4 cycles; range, 1-26) through 14 dose levels. The MTD of pemetrexed was 2,400 mg/m(2) (combined with cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m(2)) with dose-limiting toxicities of grade 4 neutropenia with grade 4 infection and grade 3 diarrhea. Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities included (febrile) neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase, and diarrhea. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that pemetrexed clearance and central volume of distribution were 40% lower than single-agent reference data, yielding a 68% increase in total systemic exposure and a 56% increase in maximal plasma concentration. Among the 50 patients evaluable for efficacy, 13 (26%) patients had a partial response and 17 (34%) patients had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed was generally well tolerated. The observed toxicities were consistent with the known toxicity profiles of pemetrexed and cyclophosphamide. Considering the MTD and the toxicity and efficacy results in this and prior studies, a low (600 mg/m(2)) and a high (1,800 mg/m(2)) dose of pemetrexed with cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)) will be evaluated in the consecutive prospective randomized phase II study.

Phase III trial comparing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to leridistim in the prevention of neutropenic complications in breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide: results of the BCIRG 004 trial.

This randomized, double-blind, phase III trial compared granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) and leridistim (formerly myelopoietin), a chimeric dual agonist that binds both G-CSF and interleukin-3 receptors, for the prevention of neutropenic complications in patients with breast cancer receiving TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy. Patients with metastatic (44%) or localized breast cancer (56%) were randomized to G-CSF 5 microg/kg subcutaneously (s.c.) daily (n = 135), leridistim 5 microg/kg s.c. daily (n = 139), or leridistim 10 microg/kg s.c. every other day alternating with placebo (n = 139). Following administration of TAC (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) on day 1, patients received growth factor beginning on day 2 until the postnadir absolute neutrophil count exceeded 1500 cells/ microL. Chemotherapy cycles were repeated every 21 days. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 7% in the G-CSF arm, 19% in the daily leridistim arm (P = 0.003 for comparison with G-CSF) and 22% in the alternate-day leridistim arm (P < 0.001 for comparison with G-CSF). There was no significant difference between treatment arms in the cumulative percentage of patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia at some point during therapy (85%-88%). However, grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 53% of cycles in the G-CSF cohort, 61% of cycles in the daily leridistim group (P = 0.063 for comparison with G-CSF), and 63% of cycles in the alternate-day leridistim group (P = 0.015 for comparison with G-CSF). We conclude that G-CSF is superior to leridistim in the prevention of febrile neutropenia in patients with advanced breast cancer receiving TAC chemotherapy. The up-front prophylactic use of G-CSF is a reasonable supportive therapy for patients treated with docetaxel/anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy.