ABSTRACT
Chronic renal disease patients under chronic dialysis (CRDD) have a multifactorial immunological deterioration with an increased risk of Candida infections. Incidence of Candida infections is increasing. Choice of suitable antifungal agents is limited due to the resistance of some species to several antifungals. Aim of the present study was to identify the distribution and antifungal susceptibility patterns of oral isolated Candida species from infected and colonized patients, as well as to investigate the risk factors for oral infection in patients on dialysis. Cross-sectional study, approved by the institutional bioethics committees was performed in CRDD patients. Demographic, clinic data, and oral mucosa samples were obtained. Infection diagnosis was established clinically and confirmed with exfoliative cytology, each sample was plated on CHROMagar Candida and incubated at 36°C for 2 days. Yeast species were identified by carbohydrate assimilation ID 32C AUX system and the apiweb database. For the antifungal susceptibility test, the M44 A-3 method (CLSI) using fluconazole (FCZ), miconazole (MCZ), nystatin (NYS), and voriconazole (VCZ). Study included 119 participants, the main cause of CRD was nephropathy due to DM2 (58%), and three-fourths of the patients were under hemodialysis. Candida prevalence was 56.3% of 67 colonized or infected patients, 88 isolates were obtained. Principal identified species were C. albicans (51.1%), C. glabrata (25%), and C. tropicalis (14.8%). C. glabrata showed a reduced response to FCZ in 50% of isolates and C. albicans had a reduced response in 16% of the isolates. Antifungal agent with the least efficacious response or with the lowest susceptibility in the isolates of these patients was MCZ, followed by VCZ and FCZ, whereas NYS induced the best antifungal response.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Candida/drug effects , Candida/isolation & purification , Candidiasis, Oral/microbiology , Mouth/microbiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Candida/classification , Candidiasis, Oral/complications , Candidiasis, Oral/diagnosis , Candidiasis, Oral/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/microbiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Diabetic Nephropathies/epidemiology , Diabetic Nephropathies/microbiology , Diabetic Nephropathies/therapy , Drug Resistance, Fungal/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Mexico/epidemiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Renal Dialysis/statistics & numerical data , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Young AdultABSTRACT
In this double-blind, randomized trial, we compared the clinical efficacy of intralesional vinblastine (VNB) and 3% sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) in the treatment of oral Kaposi's sarcoma (OKS). Subjects with OKS were randomly assigned to receive a single intralesional injection of either VNB or STS, at a standard dose (0.2 mg/cm(2)). Differences were evaluated by the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Sixteen HIV-infected patients were included, eight received VNB and eight received STS; clinical response was evaluated at days 7, 14, and 28 following treatment. Tumor size reduction was 0.68 and 0.61 cm in the VNB and STS groups, respectively (P=0.80). Two VNB patients had complete or partial response whereas four STS subjects had partial responses (P=0.61). Patients in both groups experienced minimal toxicity. We conclude that intralesional vinblastine or STS are adequate for the management of OKS. The benefits of STS are its low cost and ease of use.