Challenges in collecting information on sexual orientation and gender identity for cancer patients: perspectives of hospital and central cancer registry abstractors.

PURPOSE: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations experience cancer treatment and survival disparities; however, inconsistent sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection within clinical settings and the cancer surveillance system precludes population-based research toward health equity for this population. This qualitative study examined how hospital and central registry abstractors receive and interact with SOGI information and the challenges that they face in doing so. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 abstractors at five Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries, as well as seven abstractors from commission on cancer (CoC)-accredited hospital programs in Iowa. Interviews were transcribed, cleaned, and coded using a combination of a priori and emergent codes. These codes were then used to conduct a descriptive analysis and to identify domains across the interviews. RESULTS: Interviews revealed that abstractors had difficulty locating SOGI information in the medical record: this information was largely never recorded, and when included, was inconsistently/not uniformly located in the medical record. On occasion, abstractors reported situational recording of SOGI information when relevant to the patient's cancer diagnosis. Abstractors further noticed that, where reported, the source of SOGI information (i.e., patient, physician) is largely unknown. CONCLUSION: Efforts are needed to ensure standardized implementation of the collection of SOGI variables within the clinical setting, such that this information can be collected by the central cancer registry system to support population-based equity research addressing LGBTQ + disparities.

Population based study on the progress in survival of primarily metastatic lung cancer patients in Germany.

Lung cancer is known for its high mortality; many patients already present with metastases at the time of diagnosis. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of new treatment strategies on the survival of primarily metastatic lung cancer patients and to analyze the differences in outcomes between non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. Population-based data, provided by the Robert-Koch Institute in Germany, was used and patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2018 were included in the study. We differentiated between NSCLC and SCLC patients and analyzed the survival over time for both sexes separately, using the Kaplan-Meier method. To evaluate survival advantages, we calculated multivariable hazard ratios. In total, 127,723 patients were considered for the study. We observed a moderate increase in survival over time. All patients showed an increased survival rate when undergoing chemotherapy. Minimal to no increase in survival was shown in NSCLC patients when receiving radiotherapy, whereas SCLC patients' survival time did benefit from it. NSCLC patients receiving immunotherapy showed an increase in survival as well. It can be concluded that advancements in radiotherapy, the application of chemotherapy, and the introduction of immunotherapies lead to an increased survival time of both NSCLC and SCLC primarily metastatic lung cancer patients.

Use of Period Analysis to Timely Assess Five-Year Relative Survival for the Patients With Bone Cancer.

Background: While timely assessment of long-term survival for patients with bone cancer is essential for evaluation on early detection and prognosis level of treatment of bone cancer, those data are extremely scarce in China. We aimed to timely and accurately assess long-term survival for patients with bone cancer in Eastern China. Methods: Patients diagnosed with bone cancer during 2004 - 2018 from four cancer registries with high-quality data from Taizhou, Eastern China were included. Five-year relative survival (RS) of bone cancer patients was calculated by period analysis for overall and the stratification. We further predicted 5-year RS during upcoming 2019 - 2023 using a model-based period analysis and survival data during 2004 - 2018. Results: Overall, 5-year RS for patients with bone cancer during 2014 - 2018 reached 46.6%, being 40.8% for male and 51.0% for female. Five-year RS declined along with aging, decreasing from 58.9% for age < 45 years to 41.5% for age > 60 years, while 5-year RS for urban area was higher compared to rural area (59.1% vs. 44.3%). The 5-year RS during upcoming 2019 - 2023 reached 48.3%. We found a clear upward trend in 5-year RS during 2004 - 2023 for overall and the stratification by sex, age at diagnosis, and region. Conclusions: We found that, for first time in China using period analysis, most up-to-date 5-year RS for patients with bone cancer reached 46.6% during 2014 - 2018, and is projected to reach 48.3% for the period 2019 - 2023, which has important implications for timely evaluation on early detection and prognosis level of treatment for patients with bone cancer in Eastern China.

Trends in incidence of infrequent and frequent synchronous metastases from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Population-based data on the incidence of frequent colorectal metastases are fairly scarce, while that on rare metastatic sites are lacking. AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide epidemiological indicators of metastatic sites frequency in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Incidence was modelled using Poisson and Joinpoint regressions in a population-based cancer registry study including metastatic colorectal cancers diagnosed between 1991 and 2020 (N = 5,199). Tumor molecular markers were collected for the [2016-2020] period. RESULTS: Liver, peritoneum, lung and bone were the most frequent metastatic sites. Among frequent sites, incidence of liver and lung sites decreased in men respectively since 1999 and 2010, whereas in women incidence of liver and peritoneum sites increased steadily throughout the whole period. Each of the other sites concerned less than 3% of metastatic colorectal cancer cases and presented standardized incidence rates between 0.19 and 1.39 per 1,000,000. Among rare sites, incidence of adrenal glands, supraclavicular lymph node, mediastinum and ascites had doubled in [2016-2020] as compared to the 25 previous years. BRAFV600E variant was more frequent in presence of carcinomatosis, and absence of liver and lung metastasis while KRAS variant was more frequent in presence of lung metastasis. CONCLUSION: This study provides unprecedented incidence indicators for rare synchronous metastases of colorectal cancer.

Survival analysis for patients with metachronous contralateral breast cancer: Insights from a retrospective study.

Continued advances in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer (BC) have led to an increase in the number of long-term BC survivors and an increase in the incidence of metachronous BC in the contralateral breast. Therefore, it is important to understand the factors that influence the development of metachronous BC; however, the impact of the laterality of the initial ipsilateral (I)BC as a risk factor for the development of metachronous contralateral (MC)BC has not been extensively investigated. The present study included 17,082 female patients with stage 0-3 IBC from the prospectively maintained Korean Breast Cancer Registry from 1989-2013 and divided them into two groups: Patients with MCBC (n=88) and those without MCBC (n=16,994). Risk factors that present at the initial BC diagnosis that could significantly influence the development of MCBC were screened for and risks were evaluated using the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model. Significant differences in baseline characteristics between MCBC and non-MCBC groups were demonstrated. Patients aged <40 years, those with histological and nuclear grade 3 tumors, and those with the triple-negative BC subtype were significantly more prevalent in the MCBC group than in the non-MCBC group. Additionally, the cumulative incidence of MCBC increased over time, with a notable increase from 0.1% in year 1 to 1.6% in year 10. Survival analysis revealed no significant differences in overall or BC-specific survival between the two groups. Key predictive factors identified for MCBC included an age of <40 years at initial diagnosis, a negative progesterone receptor status, and a Ki-67 score of >14%. Overall, the present study revealed several factors associated with MCBC and emphasized the need for long-term monitoring of BC survivors, considering these newly identified risk factors.

Soft-tissue sarcoma in Japan: National Cancer Registry-based analysis from 2016 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: No previous reports have characterized national profiles of soft-tissue sarcoma overall. We examined the nationwide statistics for soft-tissue sarcoma in Japan using data from the population-based National Cancer Registry. METHODS: We identified 23 522 soft-tissue-sarcoma patients who were entered in the National Cancer Registry during 2016-19 using International Classification of Diseases-Oncology, Third Edition codes for cancer topography and morphology. We extracted data on patient demographics, tumor details (reason for diagnosis, tumor location, histology, extent of disease), hospital volume/type, treatment, and prognosis for each patient. RESULTS: Soft-tissue sarcoma showed a slight male preponderance. Approximately 5500-6000 new cases were diagnosed as soft-tissue sarcoma per year, with the age-adjusted incidence of soft-tissue sarcoma being 3.22/100000/year. The age distribution showed a single peak in the 70-79 age range, and sex-stratified data showed it was higher in men. The most common histologic subtype was liposarcoma. The most frequent tumor locations were the soft tissue and skin, followed by the retroperitoneum. Extent of disease was categorized as: "localized" (31.3%), "regional" (38.9%), or "distant" (10.5%). We found significant associations between overall survival and sex, age, tumor location, facility type, hospital volume, reason for diagnosis, extent of disease, and surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to outline the epidemiology, clinical features, treatment, prognosis, and significant factors affecting prognosis of soft-tissue sarcoma in Japan using the National Cancer Registry. Documenting our data regarding elderly patients' outcomes is essential so other countries showing similar population-aging trends can learn from our experiences. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic studies, Level III.

Blood Cancer Network Ireland (BCNI) and National Cancer Registry Ireland (NCRI) collaboration: challenges and utility of an Enhanced Blood Cancer Outcomes Registry (EBCOR) pilot.

BACKGROUND: The Blood Cancer Network Ireland and National Cancer Registry Ireland worked to create an Enhanced Blood Cancer Outcomes Registry (EBCOR). Enhanced data in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) included an extensive data dictionary, bespoke software and longitudinal follow-up. AIMS: To demonstrate the utility of the database, we applied the data to examine a clinically relevant question: Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) usefulness in predicting AML patients' survival. METHODS: A software designer and consultant haematologists in Cork University Hospital worked together to standardise a data dictionary, train registrars and populate a database. One hundred and forty-one AML patients underwent enhanced data registration. Comorbidities identified by chart review were used to examine the capability of the CCI and age at diagnosis to predict mortality using Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: In regression analysis, a dose-response relationship was observed; patients in the highest CCI tertile displayed a greater risk (HR = 4.90; 95% CI 2.79-8.63) of mortality compared to subjects in tertile 2 (HR = 2.74; 95% CI 1.64-4.57) and tertile 1 (reference). This relationship was attenuated in an analysis which adjusted for age at diagnosis. The area under the curve (AUC) for the CCI was 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.84) while the AUC for age at diagnosis was 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the CCI provides no additional prognostic information beyond that obtained from age alone at AML diagnosis and that an EBCOR can provide a rich database for cancer outcomes research, including predictive models and resource allocation.

Does the cost of cancer care for people in prison differ from those in the general population? Analysis of matched English cancer registry and hospital records.

Background: People in prison experience poorer mental and physical health compared to their peers in the general population. The causes are multi-dimensional ranging from lifestyle factors to poorer access to healthcare. Little is known about cancer in people in prison or how the cost of their care compares to the general population. Methods: Data on people diagnosed with cancer while in English prisons were identified in National Cancer Registration dataset and linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) for the years 2012-2017. General population matched patients were identified using a 1-5 ratio, based on age, gender, year of diagnosis, cancer type and disease stage. Outpatient and inpatient HES data up to six-months from diagnosis were costed using NHS Reference costs and inflated to 2017/2018 costs. Findings: 879 prison and 4326 general population cancer diagnoses were identified in HES. The adjusted six-month cost of cancer care was significantly lower for people in prison (-£1216.95% confidence interval (CI) -1638 to -795), driven by fewer outpatient attendances. However, people diagnosed in prison had higher emergency care costs (£497.95% CI 375-619). Security escorts further increased the total cost of care. Interpretation: Following a cancer diagnosis, people in English prisons have significantly lower planned care costs, but higher emergency care costs and an overall higher cost due to security escorts. Further work is required to identify ways of improving cancer care for people in prisons to ensure it is equivalent to that received by the general population. Funding: National Institute for Health and Social Care Research 16/52/53.

Estimating cure and risk of death from other causes of cancer patients: EUROCARE-6 data on head & neck, colorectal, and breast cancers.

BACKGROUND: To estimate net survival and cancer cure fraction (CF), i.e. the proportion of patients no longer at risk of dying from cancer progression/relapse, a clear distinction needs to be made between mortality from cancer and from other causes. Conventionally, CF is estimated assuming no excess mortality compared to the general population. METHODS: A new modelling approach, that corrects for patients' extra risk of dying (RR) from causes other than the diagnosed cancer, was considered to estimate both indicators. We analysed EUROCARE-6 data on head and neck (H&N), colorectal, and breast cancer patients aged 40-79, diagnosed from 1998 to 2002 and followed-up to 31/12/2014, provided by 65 European cancer registries. FINDINGS: Young male H&N cancer patients have 4 times the risk of dying from other causes than their peers, this risk decreases with age to 1.6. Similar results were observed for female. We observed an absolute increase in CF of 30 % using the new model instead of the conventional one. For colorectal cancer, CF with the new model increased by a maximum of 3 % for older patients and the RR ranged from 1 to 1.2 for both sexes. CF of female breast cancer ranged from 73 % to 79 % using the new cure model, with RR between 1.2 and 1.4. INTERPRETATION: Not considering a RR> 1 leads to underestimate the proportion of patients not bound to die of their diagnosed cancer. Estimates of cancer mortality risk have an important impact on patients' quality of life.

A novel technology for harmonizing and analyzing cancer data. Observations from integrating health connect in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.

Objective: This article aims to describe the implementation of a new health information technology system called Health Connect that is harmonizing cancer data in the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador; explain high-level technical details of this technology; provide concrete examples of how this technology is helping to improve cancer care in the province, and to discuss its future expansion and implications. Methods: We give a technical description of the Health Connect architecture, how it integrated numerous data sources into a single, scalable health information system for cancer data and highlight its artificial intelligence and analytics capacity. Results: We illustrated two practical achievements of Health Connect. First, an analytical dashboard that was used to pinpoint variations in colon cancer screening uptake in small defined geographic regions of the province; and second, a natural language processing algorithm that provided AI-assisted decision support in interpreting appropriate follow-up action based on assessments of breast mammography reports. Conclusion: Health Connect is a cutting-edge, health systems solution for harmonizing cancer screening data for practical decision-making. The long term goal is to integrate all cancer care data holdings into Health Connect to build a comprehensive health information system for cancer care in the province.

The Multi-Institutional Medullary Thyroid Cancer Collaborative Registry: Can a Rare Tumor Registry Accurately Represent the Real-World Patient Population?

Background: Large population-based registries, such as the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Registry, help in the study of rare tumors, including medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), but lack data to understand the natural history of the disease. The Medullary Thyroid Cancer Collaborative Registry (MTCCoRe) is an exhaustive multi-institutional collection of demographic, clinical, and pathological data. To determine the extent to which MTCCoRe represents the real-world MTC population, we compared the characteristics of patients enrolled in MTCCoRe with patients enrolled in population-based cancer registries. Methods: Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of MTC patients who were enrolled in MTCCoRe, Texas Cancer Registry (TCR), California Cancer Registry (CCR), and SEER between 1995 and 2018. Results: A total of 1416 patients were identified in MTCCoRe, 329 in TCR, 2105 in CCR, and 3820 in SEER. Percentages of patients 20-54 years in MTCCoRe were 58.0%, 50.2% in TCR, 47.2% in CCR, and 44.8% in SEER (p < 0.0001). About half of the patients were female (55.9% in MTCCoRe, 61.4% in TCR, 59% in CCR, and 57.5% in SEER (p = 0.3). Percentages of Hispanic and Black patients differed among cohorts (10.1% and 3.8% for MTCCoRe, 23.7% and 8.2% for TCR, 24.8% and 4.9% in CCR, and 15.9% and 8.2% for SEER, respectively; p < 0.001). MTCCoRe patients presented with more advanced T and N classifications than patients in the other registries (MTCCoRe, 28.6% T3-4 and 49.4% N1; TCR, 12.7% and 32.2%; CCR, 18.6% and 32.4%; and SEER, 24% and 37.8%; p < 0.0001). Prevalence of M1 disease was 10% in MTCCoRe, 11.9% in TCR, 14.1% in CCR, and 9.5% in SEER (p < 0.0001). In the MTCCoRe, 11.4% underwent systemic therapy (compared with 0.3% in TCR and 5.6% in CCR). Conclusions: The clinicodemographic profile of patients with MTC enrolled in a multi-institutional registry differs from those enrolled in population-based databases, with lower proportions of Hispanic and Black patients but additive data on treatment modalities. Moving forward, MTCCoRe and other registry and clinical trial enrollment efforts should intentionally include underrepresented groups via community engagement techniques, patient stakeholder involvement, and inclusion of languages other than English in study materials to yield more generalizable results and conclusions.

Survival Among Patients With Multiple Myeloma in the United States Military Health System Compared to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program.

BACKGROUND: Access to health care is an important factor affecting survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in the U.S. general population. The U.S. Military Health System (MHS) provides universal health care to beneficiaries and has been associated with improved survival across multiple malignancies. In this study, we compared survival of MHS beneficiaries with MM with MM patients from the U.S. general population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Department of Defense's Automated Central Tumor Registry (ACTUR) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) databases were used to extract data for MM patients from MHS and the U.S. general population, respectively. Patients had histologically confirmed MM between 1987 and 2013 and were followed through 2015 for overall survival. Two SEER patients were matched to each ACTUR patient by age group, sex, race, and diagnosis year group. Five and 10-year survival was compared between ACTUR and SEER patients to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) with adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: Median survival of the ACTUR patients was 47.1 months (95% CI: 43.9-50.4) compared to 33.0 months (95% CI, 32.0-35.0) of the SEER patients. Five and 10-year death rates were significantly lower for ACTUR patients than the SEER patients with an adjusted HR of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68-0.81) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.74-0.85), respectively. The survival advantage of ACTUR patients was preserved when stratified by age, sex, race, and diagnosis year. CONCLUSION: MHS beneficiaries with MM had improved overall survival compared to MM patients from the U.S. general population.

Clinical benefits of combining oral cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents with radiotherapy in patients with T2N0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma based on the reports of the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan.

BACKGROUND: T2N0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) typically responds well to radiotherapy (RT); however, achieving local control remains challenging. In cases of RT failure, total laryngectomy may be necessary. Improved local control and preservation of the larynx directly enhances patients' quality of life. Our retrospective analysis using the Japan Head and Neck Cancer Registry (JHNCR) aimed to compare the clinical benefits of RT and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with T2N0 glottic SCC. METHODS: Using data from the JHNCR (2011-2015), we included 1,231 patients with T2N0 glottic SCC. Among them, 346 received curative RT and 425 underwent curative CRT. The CRT group was further divided into the oral CRT (Oral CRT, N=120) and intravenous CRT (DIV CRT, N=305) groups. This study assessed local control rate (LCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A 1:1 propensity score-matching analysis was used to adjust for patient characteristics. RESULTS: After matching, 105 pairs compared RT with Oral CRT, and 224 pairs compared RT with DIV CRT. The variables were well-balanced in the matched populations. In the matched populations, the Oral CRT group had significantly better 5-year LCR and PFS than the RT group (LCR, 89.4 % vs. 80.6 %, P=0.043; and PFS, 85.5 % vs. 72.3 %, P=0.025, respectively), while the DIV RT group had significantly better 5-year PFS than the RT group (80.1 % vs. 68.6 %, P=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical benefits of better local and disease controls were observed when oral chemotherapy was added to RT in patients with T2N0 glottic SCC. Thus, the significance of adding oral chemotherapeutic agents to RT in the treatment of T2N0 glottic SCC requires further prospective investigation.

Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022.

Background: The National Cancer Center (NCC) of China regularly reports the nationwide statistics on cancer incidence and mortality in China. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) calculates and publishes the cancer burden of countries around the world every two years. To ensure consistency between the actual surveillance data in China and the data published by IARC, NCC has received approval from the National Health Commission and IARC to simultaneously release the cancer burden data for China in GLOBOCAN 2022. Methods: There were a total of 700 registries reporting high-quality data on cancer incidence and mortality across China in 2018, of which 106 registries with continuous monitoring from 2010 to 2018 were used to establish an age-period-cohort model to simulate the trend of cancer incidence and mortality and to estimate the incidence and mortality in China in 2022. In addition, we analyzed the temporal trends of age-standardized cancer incidence and mortality from 2000 to 2018 using data from 22 continuous cancer registries. Results: It was estimated about 4,824,700 new cancer cases and 2,574,200 new cancer deaths occurred in China in 2022. Cancers of the lung, colon-rectum, thyroid, liver and stomach were the top five cancer types, accounting for 57.42% of new cancer cases. Cancers of the lung, liver, stomach, colon-rectum and esophagus were the five leading causes of cancer deaths, accounting for 67.50% of total cancer deaths. The crude rate and age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) were 341.75 per 100,000 and 201.61 per 100,000, respectively. The crude mortality rate was 182.34 per 100,000 and the age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) was 96.47 per 100,000. The ASIR of all cancers combined increased by approximately 1.4% per year during 2000-2018, while the ASMR decreased by approximately 1.3% per year. We observed decreasing trends in ASIR and ASMR for cancers of the esophagus, stomach, and liver, whereas the ASIR increased significantly for cancers of the thyroid, prostate, and cervix. Conclusions: Cancer remains a major public health concern in China, with a cancer profile that reflects the coexistence of developed and developing regions. Sustained implementation of prevention and control measures has resulted in significant reductions in the incidence and mortality rates of certain historically high incidence cancers, such as esophageal, stomach and liver cancers. Adherence to the guidelines of the Healthy China Action Plan and the Cancer Prevention and Control Action Plan, along with continued efforts in comprehensive risk factor control, cancer screening, early diagnosis and treatment, and standardization of diagnostic and therapeutic protocols, are key strategies to effectively mitigate the increasing cancer burden by 2030.

Cancer survival analysis on population-based cancer registry data in Zhejiang Province, China (2018-2019).

Objective: This is a comprehensive overview of long-term cancer survival in Zhejiang Province, China. Hybrid analysis, a combination of cohort and period analysis, has been proposed to derive up-to-date cancer survival estimates. Using this approach, we aimed to timely and accurately analyze the 5-year relative survival (RS) and net survival (NS) in cancer registries of Zhejiang Province, China. Methods: A total of 255,725 new cancer cases diagnosed during 2013-2017 were included in 14 cancer registries in Zhejiang Province, China, with a follow-up on vital status until the end of 2019. The hybrid analysis was used to calculate the 5-year RS and 5-year NS during 2018-2019 for overall and stratifications by sex, cancer type, region, and age at diagnosis. Results: During 2018-2019, the age-standardized 5-year RS and NS for overall cancer in Zhejiang was 47.5% and 48.6%, respectively. The age-standardized 5-year RS for cancers of women (55.4%) was higher than that of men (40.0%), and the rate of urban areas (49.7%) was higher than that of rural areas (43.1%). The 5-year RS declined along with age, from 84.4% for ages <45 years to 23.7% for ages >74 years. Our results of the RS and NS showed the similar trend and no significant difference. The top five cancers with top age-standardized 5-year RS were thyroid cancer (96.0%), breast cancer (84.3%), testicular cancer (79.9%), prostate cancer (77.2%), and bladder cancer (70.6%), and the five cancers with the lowest age-standardized 5-year RS were pancreatic cancer (6.0%), liver cancer (15.6%), gallbladder cancer (17.1%), esophageal cancer (22.7%), and leukemia (31.0%). Conclusions: We reported the most up-to-date 5-year cancer RS and NS in Zhejiang Province, China for the first time, and found that the 5-year survival for cancer patients in Zhejiang during 2018-2019 was relatively high. The population-based cancer registries are recognized as key policy tools that can be used to evaluate both the impact of cancer prevention strategies and the effectiveness of health systems.

Health Care Utilization Prior to Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis in Publicly Insured Individuals in New York State.

Background: Women with early-stage ovarian cancer may be asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms. We examined health care utilization prior to ovarian cancer diagnosis to assess whether women with higher utilization differed in their prognosis and outcomes compared to women with low utilization. Methods: Using Medicaid, Medicare, and New York State Cancer Registry data for ovarian cancer cases diagnosed in 2006-2015, we examined selected health care visits that occurred 1-6 months before ovarian cancer diagnosis. We used multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for associations of sociodemographic factors with number of prediagnostic visits and number of visits with tumor characteristics, and Cox proportional hazards regression to examine differences in survival by number of visits. Results: Women with >5 vs 0 prediagnostic visits were statistically significantly less likely to be diagnosed with distant vs local stage disease (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.96), and women with 3-5 or >5 vs 0 prediagnostic visits had better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96 and HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98, respectively). In stratified analyses, the association with improved survival was observed only among cases with regional or distant stage disease. Conclusions: Women with high health care utilization prior to ovarian cancer diagnosis may have better prognosis and survival, possibly because of earlier detection or better access to care throughout treatment. Women and their health care providers should not ignore symptoms potentially indicative of ovarian cancer and should be persistent in following up on symptoms that do not resolve.

Prognostic impact of elective tracheotomy in resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Elective tracheotomy is commonly performed in resected oral squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) to maintain airway patency. However, the indications for this procedure vary among surgeons. This nationwide study evaluated the impact of tracheotomy on both the duration of in-hospital stay and long-term survival outcomes in patients with OCSCC. METHODS: A total of 18,416 patients with OCSCC were included in the analysis, comprising 7981 patients who underwent elective tracheotomy and 10,435 who did not. The primary outcomes assessed were 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). To minimize potential confounding factors, a propensity score (PS)-matched analysis was performed on 4301 patients from each group. The duration of hospital stay was not included as a variable in the PS-matched analysis. RESULTS: Prior to PS matching, patients with tracheotomy had significantly lower 5-year DSS and OS rates compared to those without (71% vs. 82%, p < 0.0001; 62% vs. 75%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariable analysis identified tracheotomy as an independent adverse prognostic factor for 5-year DSS (hazard ratio = 1.10 [1.03-1.18], p = 0.0063) and OS (hazard ratio = 1.10 [1.04-1.17], p = 0.0015). In the PS-matched cohort, the 5-year DSS was 75% for patients with tracheotomy and 76% for those without (p = 0.1488). Five-year OS rates were 66% and 67%, respectively (p = 0.0808). Prior to PS matching, patients with tracheotomy had a significantly longer mean hospital stay compared to those without (23.37 ± 10.56 days vs. 14.19 ± 8.34 days; p < 0.0001). Following PS matching, the difference in hospital stay duration between the two groups remained significant (22.34 ± 10.25 days vs. 17.59 ± 9.54 days; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: While elective tracheotomy in resected OCSCC patients may not significantly affect survival, it could be associated with prolonged hospital stays.

Statistics of bone sarcoma in Japan: report from the population-based cancer registry in Japan.

BACKGROUND: No previous reports have characterized national bone sarcoma profiles overall. We examined the nationwide statistics for bone sarcoma in Japan using data from the National Cancer Registry (NCR), a population-based cancer registry. METHODS: We identified 3,755 patients with bone sarcomas entered in the NCR during 2016-2019 using International Classification of Diseases-Oncology, Third Edition codes for cancer topography and morphology. We extracted data on patient demographics, tumor details (reason for diagnosis, tumor location, histology, extent of disease), hospital volume/type, treatment, and prognosis for each patient. RESULTS: Bone sarcoma showed a slight male preponderance. The age distribution peaked at ages 10-20 and 60-80; approximately 44% of patients were aged over 60 years. Chordoma, chondrosarcoma, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone peaked in the elderly, and Ewing's sarcoma peaked in children. Osteosarcoma had two peaks in Japan as well as in Western countries. The most frequent tumor locations were the limb (45%) and the pelvis (21%). Extent of disease was categorized as: "localized" (39%), "regional" (27%), and "distant" (11%). We found significant associations between overall survival and age, tumor location, facility type, hospital volume, histologic subtype, reason for diagnosis, and extent of disease. The latter had the poorest survival. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to outline the epidemiology, clinical features, treatment, prognosis, and significant factors affecting prognosis of bone sarcoma in Japan using the NCR. Documenting our data regarding elderly patients' outcomes is essential so other countries showing similar population-aging trends can learn from our experiences. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic studies, Level III.