ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Serum IGF-1 is an important biochemical tool to diagnose and monitor GH-related disorders. However, ethnic-specific Indian data following consensus criteria for the establishment of normative data, are not available. Our objective was to generate chronological age (CA)-, bone age (BA)- and Tanner stage-specific normative data for IGF-1 in healthy Indian children and adolescents. METHODS: A cross-sectional epidemiological study was conducted in schools and the community, which enrolled apparently healthy children and adolescents with robust exclusion criteria. The outcome measure was serum IGF-1 assessed using an electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). The 2.5th, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th (median), 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97.5th centiles for IGF-1 were estimated using generalized additive models. RESULTS: We recruited 2226 apparently healthy participants and following exclusion, 1948 (1006 boys, 942 girls) were included in the final analysis. Girls had median IGF-1 peak at CA of 13 years (321.7â ng/mL), BA of 14 years (350.2â ng/mL) and Tanner stage IV (345â ng/mL), while boys had median IGF-1 peak at CA of 15 years (318.9â ng/mL) BA of 15 years (340.6â ng/mL) and Tanner stage III (304.8â ng/mL). Girls had earlier rise, peak and higher IGF-1 values. The reference interval (2.5th-97.5th percentile) was broader during peri-pubertal ages, indicating a higher physiological variability. CONCLUSION: This study provides ethnicity-specific normative data on serum IGF-1 and will improve the diagnostic utility of IGF-1 in the evaluation and management of growth disorders in Indian children and adolescents.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a wide spectrum of clinical severity. A cytokine storm is associated with COVID-19 severity. Of these, IL-6 is significantly associated with higher mortality and is also a marker for predicting disease prognosis. IL-6 may act as a target for therapeutics and, a blockade of IL-6 function by Tocilizumab has been described as a treatment of the inflammatory process COVID-19-related. This study aims to describe our experience comparing two different methods, in detail Human IL-6 Instant ELISA and the Elecsys IL-6 based on ECLIA, for the IL-6 assessment. Design and methods: IL-6 levels from serum samples of 104 COVID-19 patients, admitted to the AOU Careggi (Hospital in Florence -Italy), were assessed by using the two above-mentioned methods, and the results were analysed through Passing-Bablok regression fit and Bland-Altman plot. Results: The regression exhibited a linear relation between the methods with a regression equation (y = - 0.13 + 0.63 x; 95 % C.I. intercept = - 0.13 to 4.55; 95 % C.I. slope = 1.03 to 1.26 with R2 = 0.89, p > 0.05), showing a positive slope. The agreement of the two methods reported a bias of -25.0 pg/mL. Thus, the two methods correlate but do not agree in terms of numeric results. Conclusions: The two assays showed good comparability. However, because of the extremely wide linear range of the ECLIA, its throughput and its capacity for immune profiling, it represents an interesting emerging technology in the immunology field.
ABSTRACT
Hemodialysis patients have an increased risk of severe complications when infected with SARS-CoV-2. The introduction of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine represented an important progress in limiting severe forms of the disease. The focus of our study is the detection of the antibody titer in chronic hemodialysis patients vaccinated with the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, Pfizer-BioNTech). The antibody titers were measured in 57 hemodialysis patients, vaccinated with 3 doses according to ministerial criteria, by ElectroChemiLuminescence ImmunoAssay (ECLIA). The response was defined as an antibody titer above the dosable level > 0,8 UI/ml. A good antibody response was defined as titer > 250 UI/ml. Infections with SARS-CoV-2 and adverse effects to the vaccine were recorded. Our study showed in 93% of the hemodialysis patients a dosable antibody response after the second dose of the vaccine. After the third dose of the vaccine, 100% of the hemodialysis patients reached a dosable antibody titer. The vaccine proved to be safe, no serious adverse events were observed. After the third dose, SARS-CoV-2 infections were still observed, but with reduced severity. A vaccination course against SARS-CoV-2 infection with three doses of BNT162b2 in the dialysis patient is associated with a good immune response and protects against severe infections.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , BNT162 Vaccine , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Renal Dialysis , RNA, MessengerABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic, required the development of different diagnostic tests. While reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-PCR) remains the first-line test of choice in acute infection diagnosis, anti-N antibodies serological assays provide a valuable tool to differentiate natural SARS-CoV-2 immunological response from that induced by vaccination, thus the goal of our study was to evaluate three serological tests agreement for these antibodies detection. METHODS: Three anti-N different tests were examined in 74 sera from patients referred or not COVID infection: immunochromatographic rapid test (Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Device Abbott, Germany), ELISA kit (NovaLisa® SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM NovaTech Immunodiagnostic GmbH, Germany) and ECLIA immunoassay (Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Roche Diagnostics, Manheim, Germany). RESULTS: Qualitative comparison of the three analytical methods revealed a moderate agreement between ECLIA immunoassay and immunochromatographic rapid test (Cohen kappa coefficient κ = 0.564). Correlation analysis indicated weak positive correlation between total Ig (IgT) detected by ECLIA immunoassay and IgG by ELISA test (p < 0.0001), the analysis of ECLIA IgT and IgM ELISA detected, showed no statistical correlation. CONCLUSION: Comparison between of three analytical systems available for anti-N SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies showed a general agreement when compared to detect total and G class immunoglobulins, while doubtful or discordant results have been highlighted for IgT and IgM class. Anyway, all the tests examined provide reliable results to assess the serological status of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Humans , Antibodies/immunologyABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC) is a simple and reliable screening test for Cushing syndrome (CS). With improved analytical performance of the current second-generation electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA; Elecsys Cortisol-II; Roche Diagnostics), there is a need to revisit the LNSC cut-offs, especially in a South-Asian population. OBJECTIVE: To derive LNSC cut-offs for diagnosis of CS using second-generation ECLIA kits. DESIGN: Diagnostic accuracy study. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 155 controls aged 18-60 years, including, normal-weight (body mass index [BMI] < 25 kg/m2 and no hypertension or diabetes [n = 53]) and overweight/obese (BMI 25-30 kg/m2 and hypertension and/or diabetes [n = 52] or BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 with/without comorbidities [n = 50]) participants. All participants submitted LNSC samples collected at home; overweight/obese controls additionally underwent dexamethasone suppression test to exclude CS. We also reviewed records of adults with endogenous CS (cases, n = 92) and a valid LNSC result using the same method. RESULTS: The 95th percentile for LNSC in controls was 6.76 nmol/L. The mean ± SD LNSC levels were 40.47 ± 49.63 nmol/L in cases and 3.37 ± 1.18 nmol/L in controls (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed excellent diagnostic performance of LNSC for CS, with area under curves (AUCs) of 0.994 (cases vs. all controls) and 0.993 (cases vs. overweight/obese controls), respectively. The best diagnostic performance was achieved at cut-offs ≥6.73 nmol/L (sensitivity: 97.8%, specificity: 94.8%) and ≥7.26 nmol/L (sensitivity: 97.8%, specificity: 95.1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LNSC measured using second-generation ECLIA demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for CS. Based on this study, we propose a LNSC cutoff ≥6.73 nmol/L to diagnose CS.
Subject(s)
Cushing Syndrome , Adult , Humans , Cushing Syndrome/diagnosis , Hydrocortisone/analysis , Overweight/diagnosis , Saliva/chemistry , Obesity/diagnosis , ImmunoassayABSTRACT
Background: An antibody specific to small-molecule inhibitor-bound TNF has enabled the development of target occupancy biomarker assays to support the development of novel treatments for autoimmune disorders. Materials & methods: ELISAs were developed for inhibitor-bound and total TNF to determine the percentage of TNF occupancy in samples from stimulated blood. Inhibitor-saturated samples allowed measurement of total and inhibitor-bound TNF in a single electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Results: TNF occupancy was proportional to inhibitor concentration in plasma samples. An electrochemiluminescence method for inhibitor-bound TNF was validated for use as a potential clinical occupancy biomarker assay. Conclusion: Development of these assays has allowed measurement of a target occupancy biomarker, which has supported progression of the first small-molecule inhibitors of TNF.
Subject(s)
Antibodies , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayABSTRACT
Vaccination against COVID-19 is the main public health approach to fight against the pandemic. The Spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 is the principal target of the neutralizing humoral response. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performances of a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) compared to conventional neutralization tests (cVNTs) and anti-S eCLIA assays in recovered and/or vaccinated healthcare workers. Our results indicate that sVNTs displayed high specificity and no cross-reactivity. Both eCLIA and sVNT immunoassays were good at identifying cVNT serum dilutions ≥1:16. The optimal thresholds when identifying cVNT titers ≥1:16, were 74.5 U/mL and 49.4 IU/mL for anti-S eCLIA and sVNT, respectively. Our data show that neutralizing antibody titers (Nab) differ from one individual to another and may diminish over time. Specific assays such as sVNTs could offer a reliable complementary tool to routine anti-S serological assays.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Neutralization Tests , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , Antibodies , Health PersonnelABSTRACT
Objectives: Cancer antigen (CA) 72-4 assay is widely used for monitoring gastric and ovarian cancers. The antigen is a mucin-like, tumor-associated glycoprotein known as TAG-72. It has been identified and characterized using two different monoclonal antibodies, CC49 and B72.3, which recognize its glycochain epitopes, Galß(1-3) sialyl-Tn and sialyl-Tn antigens, respectively. This study describes the quantitative analytical performance of a newly developed CA 72-4 assay, ARCHITECT CA 72-4. Design: and Methods: The ARCHITECT CA 72-4 assay was developed using the ARCHITECT i2000SRs and three ARCHITECT i1000SRs. The assay performance was evaluated based on guidance from CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) and correlation against Elecsys CA 72-4. Results: In the total precision study, the minimum coefficient of variation (CV) for Control/Panel samples over 4 U/mL was 1.1%. The measuring interval was from 0.95 to 200 U/mL with good linearity; and limits of blank (LoB), detection (LoD), and quantitation (LoQ) were 0.09, 0.18, and 0.95 U/mL, respectively. High dose hook effect; differences among specimen tube types; and interference of common drugs, potential cross-reactants, and endogenous substances were not observed. Significantly, this assay has high biotin tolerance at 4875 mg/mL and correlates well with the Elecys CA 72-4 assay (correlation coefficient: 0.95). Conclusions: ARCHITECT CA 72-4 is a highly sensitive and precise assay for CA 72-4 measurement in human sera and plasma.
ABSTRACT
【Objective】 To analyze the preliminary screening and follow-up testing data of HBV in Yantai area, and discuss the rationality of following up and re-entry program of HBV reactive blood donors. 【Methods】 Donors who were single reagent reactive by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in initial screening but non-reactive by nucleic acid testing (NAT) were followed up. Individual NAT(ID-NAT) was performed for HBV DNA, ELISA for HBsAg, HBsAb, HBeAb, HBeAg and HBcAb, and ECLIA for the detection of HBsAg. 【Results】 A total of 547 blood donors were HBsAg ELISA-/NAT+, and 97 were followed up, among which 24 met the requirements of re-entry while 73 did not. Of the 24 blood donors who met the re-entry requirements, 13 donated blood again, with test results all qualified. 【Conclusion】 The combination of ELISA, ID-NAT, and ECLIA methods for following up detection for HBsAg ELISA+ blood donors is recommended. Blood donors with HbsAb S/CO ≥ 10 and negative results for other tests met the re-entry requirements, with a re-entry rate at 24.74%, and the re-donation qualified rate of blood donors after re-entry was 100%.
ABSTRACT
【Objective】 To retrospectively analyze the detection results of blood donors with HBsAg reactivity to single reagent detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in our center, so as to provide basis for further consolidating the blood donor team. 【Methods】 Samples of blood donors who had been deferred for at least 6 months due to HBsAg reactivity to sole ELISA assay were collected, and HBsAg ELISA and NAT were further performed. Meanwhile, HBsAg/HBsAb/HBeAg/HBeAb/HBcAb were detected by Roche electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, and the results were statistically analyzed. 【Results】 Among these 51 selected samples, 45 were negative to two assays, 6 were reactive to sole assay, with reactivity-yield rate at 11.76% (6/51). The results of NAT/ECLIA were all negative. For five indicators of hepatitis B virus infection, 23 samples were all negative and 28 were partially positive, mainly anti-HBs, anti-HBc and anti-HBe. 【Conclusion】 The follow-up detection of HBsAg ELISA sole-reagent reactive samples, supplemented with the detection of HBV serological markers, can reduce the number of deferred blood donors, increase the willingness to donate blood again, and protect the rights and interests of blood donors.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: US Food and Drug Administration has issued Emergency Use Authorizations for hundreds of serological assays to support Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate, for the first time in children, the performance of three widely utilized SARS-CoV-2 serology commercial assays, Diesse Diagnostics (IgG, IgA, IgM) and Roche Diagnostics, both Roche Nucleocapsid (N) IgG and Roche Spike (S) IgG assays. METHODS: Sensitivity and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for each of the three different serological tests and mixed and direct comparison were performed. Univariate and multivariate Poisson regression models were fitted to calculate incidence rate ratios and 95% CIs as estimate of the effects of age, gender, time on the serology title. A p-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: Overall, 149 children were enrolled in the study. A low sensitivity was found for Diesse IgA, IgM and IgG. Compare to Diesse, Roche S had a higher sensitivity at 15-28 days from infection (0.94, 95%CI: 0.73-1.0) and Roche N at 28-84 days (0.78, 95%CI: 0.58-0.91). When a direct comparison of IgG tests sensitivity was feasible for patients with pairwise information, Roche S and Roche N showed a statistically significant higher sensitivity compared to Diesse in all the study periods, whereas there was no difference between the two Roche tests. CONCLUSION: Roche S and Roche N serology tests seem to better perform in children. Large prospective studies are needed to better define the characteristics of those tests.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , United States , Child , Humans , Prospective Studies , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin MSubject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Autoantibodies , Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , PeptidesABSTRACT
Background: Vitamin D has recently raised a great deal of controversy, not because of its traditional role of absorbing calcium and maintaining bone health, but because of its unconventional role as an endocrine factor and the extent of its impact when linked to its specific receptors (VDR) found in different tissues. Research has raced trying to find its different roles in those tissues and its association with different clinical or medical conditions, and among these cases, its role in reproductive functions and fertility in women, these studies conflicted between supporting and denying the role of vitamin D in reproductive function and rejecting this hypothesis according to the results of their study. Materials and methods: The in vitro fertilization process allowed us to study the possible hypotheses, as this technique provides an opportunity to study the relationship between vitamin D levels with the in vitro fertilization outcomes, thus providing us with an idea of the relationship of vitamin D with fertility in women. In order to study this relationship, we designed our research as a cross-sectional study to confirm or deny this claim. Vitamin D was measured in the blood and in the follicular fluid for all cases using the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) for the assay of total vitamin D, then IVF outcomes were compared with the levels of vitamin D in the blood. Results: the levels of vitamin D are not related to the criteria of eggs such as the number of eggs and the maturity rate (MR) of eggs, but they are correlated in a statistically significant manner with the fertility rate (FR), and at the same time the levels of vitamin D in the blood were completely independent of the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). Conclusion: blood vitamin D levels will affect the FR when its levels in the blood drop below a specified value, vitamin D did not correlate with the CPR. In the long run, there is scope for more research projects on vitamin D. Future research could include case-control studies of patients on vitamin D supplementation, and the study of its correlation with IVF outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Reliable serological tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among infected or vaccinated individuals are important for epidemiological and clinical studies. Low-cost approaches easily adaptable to high throughput screenings, such as Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA) or electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), can be readily validated using different SARS-CoV-2 antigens. A total of 1,119 serum samples collected between March and July of 2020 from health employees and visitors to the University Hospital at the University of São Paulo were screened with the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay (Elecsys) (Roche Diagnostics) and three in-house ELISAs that are based on different antigens: the Nucleoprotein (N-ELISA), the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD-ELISA), and a portion of the S1 protein (ΔS1-ELISA). Virus neutralization test (CPE-VNT) was used as the gold standard to validate the serological assays. We observed high sensitivity and specificity values with the Elecsys (96.92% and 98.78%, respectively) and N-ELISA (93.94% and 94.40%, respectively), compared with RBD-ELISA (90.91% sensitivity and 88.80% specificity) and the ΔS1-ELISA (77.27% sensitivity and 76% specificity). The Elecsys® proved to be a reliable SARS-CoV-2 serological test. Similarly, the recombinant SARS-CoV-2 N protein displayed good performance in the ELISA tests. The availability of reliable diagnostic tests is critical for the precise determination of infection rates, particularly in countries with high SARS-CoV-2 infection rates, such as Brazil. Collectively, our results indicate that the development and validation of new serological tests based on recombinant proteins may provide new alternatives for the SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic market.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Antibodies, Viral , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/diagnosis , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Hospitals , Humans , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Introduction: There is a need for detailed data on early antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 as this may contribute to the prediction of the clinical course of COVID-19 and the optimization of convalescent plasma treatment. This study aims to gain insight into developing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in health care workers (HCWs) infected in the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the Netherlands. Materials and methods: In this retrospective analysis, sera from PCR-confirmed COVID-19 positive HCWs are included at the time of the initial PCR (T = 0, n = 95) and at least 21 days after the initial serum (T ≥ 21, n = 133). This study assesses correlations between qualitative total Ig, IgM, IgA, IgG, and quantitative anti-S-RBD antibody responses and participant characteristics. Results: Higher Ct values were associated with higher antibody positivity rates for total Ig (OR 1.261 (95% CI 1.095-1.452)), IgM (OR 1.373 (95% CI 1.125-1.675)), and IgA (OR 1.222 (95% CI 1.013-1.475)). Gender was predictive of IgM and IgA antibody positivity rates at T = 0 (OR 0.018 (95% CI 0.001-0.268)) and (OR 0.070 (95% CI 0.008-0.646)). At T ≥ 21, a substantial proportion of HCWs developed IgM (103/133; 77.4%) and total Ig (128/133; 96.2%) antibodies. IgA and IgG seroconversions were observed in only 51.1% (67/131) and 55.7% (73/131) of HCWs. Anti-S-RBD responses were higher when the interval between onset of symptoms and sampling was longer. Conclusion: The findings of this study give insight into early antibody responses and may have implications for the selection of convalescent plasma donors and the further development of monoclonal antibody treatment.
ABSTRACT
Vancomycin and digoxin are associated with potential toxicity and serum concentrations need to be monitored in certain patients. Previous reports suggested IgM paraproteins could interfere with vancomycin assays, and no paraprotein interference has been reported with digoxin assays. Here we present a suspected case of free-kappa light chains-mediated falsely low digoxin and vancomycin concentrations with Abbott particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (PETINIA) method. A 53-year-old patient received multiple doses of vancomycin and digoxin intravenously, but trough vancomycin and random digoxin concentrations repeatedly measured as <1.1 µg/mL and <0.2 ng/mL respectively with Abbott PETINIA method. Results from alternative methods showed concentrations reaching toxic levels and administration of the drugs was immediately terminated. A significantly elevated level of free-kappa light chains, possibly in polymeric form as suggested by protein electrophoresis result, was suspected to be the cause of falsely low results. During the laboratory investigation, absorbance curves revealed increased agglutination in the patient's samples in the latter part of the reaction, suggesting interfering substances led to production of turbidity after reagents were added. Protein-free filtration partially recovered the drugs with Abbott PETINIA. When drug concentrations do not correlate with clinical judgment, clinicians and pharmacists should consult clinical laboratories for investigation of potential interfering substances.
ABSTRACT
Background: Thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies (TSH-RAb) are indispensable biomarkers in the laboratory assessment of thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO). Clinical sensitivity of three different assays for TSH-R-Ab determination was evaluated in patients with TAO. Methods: 87 consecutive TAO patients were enrolled and their serum samples analyzed in parallel with three assays. An ECLIA competitive binding and a chemiluminescent bridge immunoassay were used to measure total and binding TSH-R-Ab concentration, while their functional activity was determined using a stimulatory TSH-R-Ab (TSAb) cellbased bioassay. Results: Compared to the two binding assays (ECLIA p<0.001, bridge p=0.003), the TSAb bioassay was more sensitive pertaining to the positive detection of TSH-R-Ab in TAO patients. No difference (p=0.057) was noted between the ECLIA and bridge assays regarding sensitivity rate. All patients with active and/or moderate-to-severe TAO tested positive in the TSAb bioassay (100% and 100%, respectively), while the positivity rates for bridge and ECLIA binding assays were 89.7% and 82.1% for active TAO, and 90.2% and 86.3% for severe TAO, respectively. Negative predictive values of the bioassay, bridge, and ECLIA assays were 100%, 75%, and 71%, respectively for active TAO, and 100%, 86%, and 71%, respectively for moderate-to-severe TAO. The superiority of the bioassay was most prominent in euthyroid (ET) TAO. Positivity rates of the TSAb bioassay, bridge and ECLIA binding assays were 89.6%, 75%, and 64.6%, respectively for inactive TAO; 86.1%, 69.4%, and 52.8%, respectively for mild TAO; 87.5%, 62.5%, and 12.5%, respectively for euthyroid TAO. The bridge assay correlated better with the ECLIA binding assay (r=0.893, p<0.001), compared to the bioassay (r=0.669, p<0.001). Conclusions: In patients with TAO of various activity and severity, the TSAb bioassay demonstrates a superior clinical performance compared to both ECLIA and bridge binding assays.
ABSTRACT
Complete nutrition drinks with a low glycemic index (GI) provide nutritional support and prevent hyperglycaemia. The present study identified GI and factors predicting individual glucose response to a new complete nutrition drink. A randomised cross-over controlled trial was conducted in eighteen healthy volunteers (FPG < 100 mg/dl). Complete nutrition drinks containing retrograded starch, glucose solution and white bread were assigned in a random sequence with 14-day wash-out intervals. Plasma glucose and insulin levels were measured from baseline to 180 min after consuming each food. Results show the adjusted GIs of the drink was 48.2 ± 10.4 and 46.7 ± 12.7 with glucose and white bread as the reference, respectively. While the drink has low GI (<55), the individual glucose responses varied (GI: 7-149). Comparing characters in individual GI < 55 (n = 12) and GI ≥ 55 (n = 6) groups revealed significantly higher baseline insulin in the low GI group (14.86 ± 16.51 µIU/ml v. 4.9 ± 3.4 µIU/ml, P < 0·05). The correlation matrix confirms only two predictive factors for having individual GI <55 were baseline insulin (r = 0·5, P = 0·03) and HOMA-IR (r = 0·55, P = 0·02). ROC curve reveals fasting insulin above 1.6 µIU/ml and HOMA-IR above 1.05 as the cut-off values. The findings suggest that the complete nutrition drink has a low GI, but there was wide variability in individual responses partly explained by fasting insulin levels and HOMA-IR. Screening for fasting insulin and HOMA-IR may be encouraged to maximise the functional benefit of the drink.
Subject(s)
Fasting , Glucose , Blood Glucose , Humans , Insulin , StarchABSTRACT
Globally, 70 million people are annually affected by TBI. A significant proportion of all TBI cases are actually mild TBI (concussion, 70-85%), which is considerably more difficult to diagnose due to the absence of apparent symptoms. Current clinical practice of diagnosing mTBI largely resides on the patients' history, clinical aspects, and CT and MRI neuroimaging observations. The latter methods are costly, time-consuming, and not amenable for decentralized or accident site measurements. As an alternative (and/or complementary), mTBI diagnostics can be performed by detection of mTBI biomarkers from patients' blood. Herein, we proposed two strategies for the detection of three mTBI-relevant biomarkers (GFAP, h-FABP, and S100ß), in standard solutions and in human serum samples by using an electrochemiluminescence (ECL) immunoassay on (i) a commercial ECL platform in 96-well plate format, and (ii) a "POC-friendly" platform with disposable screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCE) and a portable ECL reader. We further demonstrated a proof-of-concept for integrating three individually developed mTBI assays ("singleplex") into a three-plex ("multiplex") assay on a single SPCE using a spatially resolved ECL approach. The presented methodology demonstrates feasibility and a first step towards the development of a rapid POC multiplex diagnostic system for the detection of a mTBI biomarker panel on a single SPCE.
Subject(s)
Brain Concussion , Biomarkers , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Humans , Immunoassay , Luminescent Measurements/methods , Point-of-Care SystemsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in patients with probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) according to the modified Boston criteria in a retrospective multicentric cohort. METHODS: Beta-amyloid 1-40 (Aß40), beta-amyloid 1-42 (Aß42), total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau181) were measured in 31 patients with probable CAA, 28 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and 30 controls. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analyses were performed for the measured parameters as well as the Aß42/40 ratio to estimate diagnostic parameters. A meta-analysis of all amenable published studies was conducted. RESULTS: In our data Aß42/40 (AUC 0.88) discriminated best between CAA and controls while Aß40 did not perform well (AUC 0.63). Differentiating between CAA and AD, p-tau181 (AUC 0.75) discriminated best in this study while Aß40 (AUC 0.58) and Aß42 (AUC 0.54) provided no discrimination. In the meta-analysis, Aß42/40 (AUC 0.90) showed the best discrimination between CAA and controls followed by t-tau (AUC 0.79), Aß40 (AUC 0.76), and p-tau181 (AUC 0.71). P-tau181 (AUC 0.76), Aß40 (AUC 0.73), and t-tau (AUC 0.71) differentiated comparably between AD and CAA while Aß42 (AUC 0.54) did not. In agreement with studies examining AD biomarkers, Aß42/40 discriminated excellently between AD and controls (AUC 0.92-0.96) in this study as well as the meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: The analyzed parameters differentiate between controls and CAA with clinically useful accuracy (AUC > â¼0.85) but not between CAA and AD. Since there is a neuropathological, clinical and diagnostic continuum between CAA and AD, other diagnostic markers, e.g., novel CSF biomarkers or other parameters might be more successful.