Beneficios y limitaciones de la planificación centrada en la persona en el campo de la discapacidad intelectual y del desarrollo: una revisión sistemática según las directrices de PRISMA / Benefits and limitations of person-centered planning in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines

La metodología de Planificación Centrada en la Persona (PCP) cada vez tiene mayor impacto en España. Comenzando desde las distintas legislaciones que regulan la atención a este colectivo en las diferentes autonomías y terminando en los centros que proveen este servicio. No obstante, existe escasa literatura internacional de estudios empíricos a grandes escalas que sitúen este enfoque metodológico en una posición relevante que garantice la eficacia de la PCP. El objetivo principal de este estudio es conocer el estado del uso de la metodología de PCP a través de estudios avalados empíricamente que sostengan tanto beneficios como limitaciones durante los últimos 10 años (2012-2022). Para ello, se ha realizado una revisión sistemática desde las directrices de PRISMA (2020), que incluye un total de 31 artículos. Como conclusión, se han descubierto más beneficios que limitaciones entre las que destacan las ventajas en su uso para las personas con discapacidad intelectual y del desarrollo y las mejoras de aspectos relacionados con la autodeterminación. No obstante, las limitaciones prevalecen por la falta de apoyos y recursos adecuados de las organizaciones para responder a una planificación centrada en la persona y la necesidad de formación de las personas implicadas en la elaboración de la PCP, lo que genera la incógnita de si se están realizando buenas prácticas en el uso de dicha metodología. (AU)

The methodology of Person Centered Planning (PCP) is having an increasing impact in Spain. Starting from the different legislations that regulate the attention to this group in the different autonomous regions and ending in the centers that provide this service. However, there is little international literature on large-scale empirical studies that place this methodological approach in a relevant position to guarantee the efficacy of PCP. The main objective of this study is to know the status of the use of PCP methodology through empirically supported studies that sustain both benefits and limitations during the last 10 years (2012-2022). For this purpose, a systematic review has been conducted since the PRISMA guidelines (2020), including a total of 31 articles. As a conclusion, more benefits than limitations have been found, among which the advantages in its use for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and improvements in aspects related to self-determination stand out. However, limitations prevail due to the lack of adequate support and resources from organizations to respond to person-centered planning and the need for training of the people involved in the development of the PCP, which raises the question of whether good practices are being carried out in the use of this methodology. (AU)

Beneficios y limitaciones de la planificación centrada en la persona en el campo de la discapacidad intelectual y del desarrollo: una revisión sistemática según las directrices de PRISMA / Benefits and limitations of person-centered planning in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines

La metodología de Planificación Centrada en la Persona (PCP) cada vez tiene mayor impacto en España. Comenzando desde las distintas legislaciones que regulan la atención a este colectivo en las diferentes autonomías y terminando en los centros que proveen este servicio. No obstante, existe escasa literatura internacional de estudios empíricos a grandes escalas que sitúen este enfoque metodológico en una posición relevante que garantice la eficacia de la PCP. El objetivo principal de este estudio es conocer el estado del uso de la metodología de PCP a través de estudios avalados empíricamente que sostengan tanto beneficios como limitaciones durante los últimos 10 años (2012-2022). Para ello, se ha realizado una revisión sistemática desde las directrices de PRISMA (2020), que incluye un total de 31 artículos. Como conclusión, se han descubierto más beneficios que limitaciones entre las que destacan las ventajas en su uso para las personas con discapacidad intelectual y del desarrollo y las mejoras de aspectos relacionados con la autodeterminación. No obstante, las limitaciones prevalecen por la falta de apoyos y recursos adecuados de las organizaciones para responder a una planificación centrada en la persona y la necesidad de formación de las personas implicadas en la elaboración de la PCP, lo que genera la incógnita de si se están realizando buenas prácticas en el uso de dicha metodología. (AU)

The methodology of Person Centered Planning (PCP) is having an increasing impact in Spain. Starting from the different legislations that regulate the attention to this group in the different autonomous regions and ending in the centers that provide this service. However, there is little international literature on large-scale empirical studies that place this methodological approach in a relevant position to guarantee the efficacy of PCP. The main objective of this study is to know the status of the use of PCP methodology through empirically supported studies that sustain both benefits and limitations during the last 10 years (2012-2022). For this purpose, a systematic review has been conducted since the PRISMA guidelines (2020), including a total of 31 articles. As a conclusion, more benefits than limitations have been found, among which the advantages in its use for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and improvements in aspects related to self-determination stand out. However, limitations prevail due to the lack of adequate support and resources from organizations to respond to person-centered planning and the need for training of the people involved in the development of the PCP, which raises the question of whether good practices are being carried out in the use of this methodology. (AU)

Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso en conducta suicida: una revisión sistemática / Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on suicidal behavior: a systematic review

El suicidio se ha convertido en un problema social y de salud pública a nivel mundial. En este sentido, la Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso (ACT) podría ser eficaz en su abordaje, existiendo evidencia sobre la relación entre algunos de sus componentes y la conducta suicida. Así, el presente estudio tuvo por objetivo realizar una revisión sistemática sobre la eficacia de ACT en conducta suicida. Para ello se siguió el protocolo PRISMA, empleando las siguientes bases de datos: PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus y PsicoDoc. Inicialmente se obtuvieron 108 publicaciones potencialmente relevantes, de las cuales, finalmente, 13 fueron incluidas en la revisión. La calidad de los estudios se analizó a través de un instrumento de evaluación de riesgo de sesgos. Como resultados, a nivel general se observaron disminuciones estadísticamente significativas en ideación suicida (IS) y factores de riesgo de suicidio. Además, algunos estudios señalaron relaciones estadísticamente significativas entre un aumento de flexibilidad psicológica y la disminución de IS. Si bien los datos apuntaron a una posible eficacia de ACT en la reducción de IS, es necesario llevar a cabo mayor número de estudios experimentales que contemplen la complejidad de la conducta suicida y exploren los procesos de cambio implicados.(AU)

Suicide has emerged as a pressing global issue affecting both so-ciety and public health.In this context, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) could prove effective in its approach, supported by evi-dence of the relationship between certain components of ACT and suicidal behavior. Thus, the present study aims to conduct a systematic review on the efficacy of ACT in suicidal behavior. For this, the PRISMA protocol was followed, using thefollowing databases: PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus and PsicoDoc. Initially, 108 potentially relevant publicationswereobtained,13ofwhichwerefinallyincludedinthereview.Weanalyzedstudy qualityus-ingariskofbiasassessmentinstrument.Asaresult,statisticallysignificantdecreases in suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide risk factors were observed. In addition, some studies indicated statistically significant relationships be-tween increased psychological flexibility and decreasedSI.WhilethedatasuggestedthepotentialeffectivenessofACTinreducingsuicidal ideation (SI), more experimental studies are needed to consider the complexity of suicidal behavior and explore the processes of changeinvolved.(AU)

Factores de riesgo transdiagnósticos de los trastornos emocionales en adultos: una revisión sistemática / Transdiagnostic risk factors of emotional disorders in adults: A systematic review

La comorbilidad es más la regla que la excepción en salud mental y, sobre todo, en el caso de la ansiedad y la depresión. Los modelos transdiagnósticos estudian los procesos subyacentes para mejorar el tratamiento y la comprensión de la salud mental. Objetivo: Esta revisión sistemática busca evidencias sobre los factores de riesgo transdiagnósticos para la ansiedad y la depresión en la población clínica diagnosticada de estas condiciones psicopatológicas, analizando los diferentes tipos o categorías de factores identificados. Método: Se registró una revisión sistemática en PROSPERO (número de registro CRD42022370327) y se diseñó de acuerdo con las guías PRISMA-P. La calidad del estudio fue evaluada por dos revisores independientes con conocimiento del campo para reducir el posible sesgo. Resultados: Cincuenta y tres artículos fueron examinados y las variables transdiagnósticas fueron agrupadas en tres categorías: psicológicas, biológicas y socioculturales. Conclusiones: La categoría más estudiada fue la de variables psicológicas, en especial los procesos cognitivos, afecto negativo y neuroticismo, intolerancia a la incertidumbre, sensibilidad a la ansiedad. Los factores biológicos y socioculturales requieren más estudio para sustentar su enfoque transdiagnóstico.(AU)

Comorbidity is more the rule than the exception in mental health, specifically in the case of anxiety and depression. Transdiagnostic models studied the underlying processes to improve mental health treat-ment and understating. Objective:This systematic review searchs for evi-dence on transdiagnostic risk factors for anxiety and depression in the clin-ical population diagnosed with these psychopathological conditions, by an-alysing the different types or categories of factors identified.Methods:A sys-tematic review was registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022370327) and was designed according to PRISMA-P guidelines. Two independent reviewers with field knowledge assessed the study quality to reduce bias.Results: Fifty-three articles were examined, and the transdi-agnostic variables were grouped into three categories: psychological, bio-logical, and sociocultural.Conclusions:The most studied category was that of psychological variables, especially cognitive processes, negative affect, and neuroticism, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety sensitivity. Biological and sociocultural factors require more study to support their transdiagnos-tic approach.(AU)

Revision after prior failed pectus excavatum repair: higher risks and greater complications than primary surgery.

Background: Revision of a prior failed pectus excavatum (PE) repair is occasionally required. These procedures may be technically more complex and have a greater risk of complications. This study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of adult patients undergoing revision procedures. Methods: A retrospective review of adult patients who underwent revision of a prior PE repair from 2010 to 2023 at Mayo Clinic Arizona was performed. Patients were classified by prior procedure [minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE), Open/Ravitch, and both] and the type of revision procedure performed [MIRPE, hybrid MIRPE, complex hybrid reconstruction, or complex reconstruction of acquired thoracic dystrophy (ATD)]. Outcomes and complications of these groups were analyzed and compared. Results: In total, 190 revision cases were included (mean age was 33±10 years; 72.6% males, mean Haller Index: 4.4±1.8). For the initial repair procedure, 90 (47.4%) patients had a previous MIRPE, 87 (45.8%) patients a prior open repair, and thirteen (6.8%) patients had both. Furthermore, 30 (15.8%) patients had two or more prior interventions. Patients having had a prior MIRPE were able to be repaired with a revision MIRPE in 82.2% of the cases. Conversely, patients with a prior open repair (including those who had both prior MIRPE and open repairs) were much more likely to require complex reconstructions (85%) as none of the ATD patients in this group had an attempted MIRPE. Operative times were shortest in the MIRPE redo approach and longest in the complex reconstruction of the ATD patients (MIRPE 3.5±1.3 hours, ATD 6.9±1.8 hours; P<0.001). The median length of hospital stay was 5 days [interquartile range (IQR), 3.0 days] with the shortest being the MIRPE approach and the longest occurring in the complex reconstruction of the ATD patients [MIRPE 4 days (IQR, 3.0 days); ATD 7 days (IQR, 4.0 days); P<0.001]. Major and minor complications were more frequent in the ATD complex reconstruction group. Preoperative chronic pain was present in over half of the patients (52.6%). Although resolution was seen in a significant number of patients, significant pain issues persisted in 8.8% of the patients postoperatively. Overall, persistent, long term chronic pain was greatest in the post open/Ravitch patient group (open 13.6% vs. MIRPE 3.6%, P=0.02). Conclusions: Revision of a prior failed PE repair can be technically complex with a high risk of complications, prolonged duration of surgery, and lengthy hospitalization. Chronic pain is prevalent and its failure to completely resolve after surgery is not uncommon. The initial failed repair will influence the type of procedure that can be performed and potentially subsequent complications. Even when some recurrences after previous PE surgeries can be repaired with acceptable results, this study demonstrates the importance of proper primary repair due to these increased risks.

Long-term patient reported outcomes after revision surgery for lower extremity nonunion: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Ongoing lower extremity long-bone nonunion is a devastating condition and associated with substantial patient morbidity. There is limited evidence regarding physical and mental function after surgical management of lower extremity nonunions. The purpose of this study was to assess general physical and mental health and lower extremity specific physical function of patients that underwent surgery for a lower extremity long-bone nonunion. METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-four adult patients who underwent successful surgical management for a lower extremity long-bone nonunion between June 2002 and December 2021 were evaluated at an average follow-up of 8.6 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 4 - 12). General physical and mental health was assessed with the Short-Form 12 (SF-12) physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summaries, and lower extremity specific physical function with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify variables that were independently associated with outcomes. RESULTS: The median LEFS was 50 (IQR: 37 - 63) and the median SF-12 PCS was 43 (IQR: 33 - 52), which are both lower than normative population scores (LEFS: 77 and PCS: 51, p < 0.0001). The median SF-12 MCS was 50, which was comparable to the normative population score of 51 (p < 0.0001). The number of previous surgeries before the index nonunion treatment (p = 0.018 and p = 0.041) and the number of revision surgeries after the index nonunion treatment (p = 0.022 and p = 0.041) were associated with lower LEFS and SF-12 PCS scores. CONCLUSION: At an average of 8.6 years after lower extremity nonunion surgery that led to bone healing, patients continue to report lower general and lower extremity specific physical functioning compared to the normative population. The number of surgical attempts to obtain definitive healing was associated with compromised physical function scores. Mental health scores may return close to normative population scores. These results can be used to inform patients and guide treatment strategies and healthcare policies.

High Rates of Early Septic Failure, But Low Rates of Aseptic Loosening after Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Contemporary Rotating-Hinge Prostheses.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine implant survivorship and functional outcomes for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) with contemporary rotating-hinge knee implants. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 115 rTKAs using contemporary rotating-hinge implants from 2014 to 2018 for the treatment of instability (34, 30%), reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (33, 29%), aseptic loosening (25, 22%), arthrofibrosis (14, 12%), periprosthetic fracture (4, 3%), osteolysis (4, 3%), and femoral component fracture (1, 1%). There were 70 women (61%), and the mean age was 67 years (range, 27 to 94). The mean follow-up was 3 years (range, 2 to 6). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models estimated survivorship. RESULTS: The re-revision rate was 20% (23 of 115) at an average of 18 months postoperatively. Re-revision indications included PJI (n = 14), aseptic loosening (n = 4), arthrofibrosis (n = 2), instability/malalignment (n = 1), femoral stem fracture (n = 1), and hinge mechanism disruption (n = 1). At 2 and 5 years, survivorship free from all-cause re-revision was 86% and 64%, and survivorship free from re-revision for aseptic loosening was 100% and 87%, respectively. Use of a rotating-hinge implant in reimplantation after PJI was a risk factor for subsequent re-revision (hazard ratio = 2.4, P = 0.046). On a radiographic review of unrevised rotating-hinges, there were major radiolucent lines around 2 femoral and 5 tibial components. The mean Knee Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) increased from 43 preoperatively to 60 at 1 year (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients treated with a rotating-hinge implant for rTKA, there were relatively poor 2-year (86%) and 5-year (64%) survivorship free from all-cause re-revision, most commonly due to PJI. Mid-term survivorship free from re-revision for aseptic loosening was modest (87%). There should be a goal to mitigate complications in complex rTKAs with rotating-hinge implants, namely PJI.

The Impact of Surgeon Volume on Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Survivorship: A Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has remained low when compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), possibly due to higher rates of revision and reoperation. This study aimed to quantify surgeon UKA case-volumes and measure the effect of surgeon volume on early revision. We hypothesized that surgeons who have high case volumes would have lower revision rates compared to medium- and low-volume surgeons. METHODS: Primary UKAs were performed between February 2012 and November 2021, and associated revisions were identified utilizing the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI). Surgeon information, including total cases and annual UKA volume, was collected. Case volume per year was stratified as High (≥ 35 cases per year), Medium (15 to 34 cases per year), and low (< 15 cases per year). RESULTS: There were a total of 15,542 UKAs performed. Of these, 701 (4.5%) were revised, and 412 (58.8%) revisions occurred within 2 years. Of the 287 surgeons who performed an UKA in the registry, 237 (82.6%) were low-volume surgeons, 36 (12.5%) were medium-volume, and 14 (4.9%) were high-volume. High-volume surgeons were more likely to operate on older patients (P < 0.01), Medicare patients (P < 0.01), and patients who had ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) scores of III and IV (P < 0.01). High-volume surgeons had significantly lower 5-year revision rates compared to medium and low-volume surgeons (high: 4.3% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 3.70 to 4.90), medium: 5.2% (4.44 to 6.12), low: 7.2% (6.37 to 8.02); P < 0.001). In comparison, the 5-year revision rate for TKA in Michigan was 3.0% (95% CI: 2.90 to 3.08). CONCLUSION: When UKAs were performed by high-volume surgeons in the state of Michigan, there was better survivorship when compared to low-volume and medium-volume surgeons. High-volume surgeons were more likely to perform UKA on older patients, Medicare patients, and patients who had ASA scores of III and IV. The revision rate for the high-volume surgeons still exceeded the 5-year revision rate for total knee arthroplasty in Michigan.

Readmission rate after adult scoliosis surgery on primary cases over 45 years-old with long term follow-up.

PURPOSE: Scoliosis surgery is becoming increasingly frequent. Rate of readmission is little discussed in the literature. It is an interesting data for the patient's information and for public authorities to calculate cost-effectiveness. Aim of the study was to evaluate rate and causes of short and long-term readmissions in patients > 45 years old operated on for a scoliosis primary cases, then to look for predictors of these readmissions. METHODS: In this monocentric retrospective cohort study, over 45 years-old scoliosis primary cases operated on between 2015 and 2018 and with a minimum of 2 years follow-up were included. The number of readmissions and their causes were analyzed. Rehospitalized patients (RH) were then compared to non-rehospitalized patients (NRH). Risk factors were sought using a multivariate analysis by logistic regression. RESULTS: 105 patients were included (90% female; 64 ± 8 years). 56% were readmitted at least once. Main cause of readmission as pseudarthrosis (70%). Among the RH patients, fifty-eight required at least one revision. We found no significant difference between RH and NRH, apart from the rate of immediate post-operative medical complications which was significantly higher in RH (17% (n = 11) vs. 4% (n = 2), p = 0.04). According to multivariate analysis, BMI and age were found as predictors of readmission of mechanical origin, and BMI for readmissions of septic origin. CONCLUSION: The readmission rate after scoliosis surgery was 56%. The main cause was pseudarthrosis. Rehospitalized patients had more immediate post-operative medical complications. The elderly and overweight patients are more likely to be readmitted for mechanical or septic reasons.

Risk Factors for Perioperative Nerve Injury Related to Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Background: Nerve injury following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a rare but serious adverse event. While prior studies have reported risk factors for nerve injury related to THA, they are limited to institutional data or small sample sizes. The current study aimed to leverage a large, national database to assess independent risk factors for sustaining nerve injury with THA. Methods: The 2010-2021 PearlDiver M157 database was queried for adult THA cases. Those with nerve injury within 90 days of THA were identified. Patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI), fracture indication, and surgery type (index vs revision) were assessed for correlation with nerve injury by multivariate analyses. Results: Out of 750,695 THAs, 2659 (0.35%) had nerve injuries. Multivariate analysis revealed independent predictors of nerve injury in decreasing odds ratio (OR) order to include: revision procedure (OR: 2.13), female sex (OR 1.35), ECI (ECI 1-2 [OR 1.27], ECI 3-4 [OR 1.43], and ECI ≥5 [OR 1.59]) and age (OR 1.02 per decade decrease) (P < .05 for each). Pertinent negatives by multivariate analysis included underweight BMI (<20), and fracture indication. Individuals with morbidly obese BMI status (≥35) had a decreased risk of nerve injury (OR 0.84, P = .019). Conclusions: THA-related nerve injury was found to be low at 0.35%. Factors independently associated with this adverse outcome were defined, of which the greatest risk was seen in revision procedures. These risk factors, derived from the largest cohort to date, may be helpful for risk stratification and patient counseling.

Intraoperative computerised tomography scan for percutaneous fixation of the pelvis: a retrospective case series.

PURPOSE: Fractures and dislocations of the pelvic ring are complex injuries that when treating require meticulous attention to detail and often specialized technical skill. These injuries can be the result of high-energy trauma, particularly in younger patients, or low energy trauma more often found in the elderly. Regardless of mechanism, these injuries lie on a spectrum of severity and can be treated conservatively or surgically. Percutaneous fixation under fluoroscopic guidance is the preferred standard technique when treating these fractures. This technique can be challenging for a variety of reasons including patient characteristics, intra-operative image quality, fracture morphology, among others. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the use of intra-operative computed tomography (CT) using an O-arm imaging system for critical evaluation of fluoroscopic-guided screw placement in twenty-three patients. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of patients who were treated by three fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists during a one-year span. Patients undergoing percutaneous pelvis fixation using both standard fluoroscopy and intraoperative CT with the Medtronic O-arm® (Minneapolis, MN) imaging system. Additionally, procedures performed included open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the pelvic ring, acetabulum, and associated extremity fractures. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included in this study. On average, the use of intraoperative CT added 24.4 min in operative time. Five patients (21.7%) required implant adjustment after O-arm spin. Fourteen patients underwent additional post-operative CT. No secondary revision surgeries were attempted after any post-operative CT. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that intra-operative CT scan, compared to post-operative CT scan, can be utilized to prevent take-back surgery for misplaced implants and allow for adjustment in real-time.

Managing B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: ORIF vs stem-revision.

BACKGROUND: The gold-standard treatment for Vancouver type B2 and B3 fractures is revision arthroplasty. This procedure can be prolonged and complex, posing challenges for patients with severe medical comorbidities and reduced physical status. Recently, osteosynthesis has been proposed as an alternative treatment for B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) in frail patients, though its efficacy compared to revision arthroplasty has not been studied in detail. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from 2012 to 2022, comparing complications, mortality, length of stay, gait ability, hemoglobin decrease, and blood transfusion rates between 44 patients undergoing treatment for B2 or B3 PPF with either stem-revision arthroplasty (n = 28) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and screws (n = 16). RESULTS: The results showed no significant differences in mortality, complications, hemoglobin decrease, blood transfusion rate, or length of stay between the two groups. In the stem-revision group, 11 patients (60.7 %) experienced a medical complication, while 7 patients (43.8 %) in the ORIF group had complications (p = 0.778). The mortality rate within the first year post-surgery was 17.9 % (5 patients) in the stem-revision group compared to 18.8 % (3 patients) in the ORIF group (p = 0.943). Surgical complications occurred in 2 patients (7.1 %) in the stem-revision group and in 4 patients (25 %) in the ORIF group (p = 0.101). Blood transfusions were required in 17 patients (60.7 %) in the stem-revision group and in 8 patients (50 %) in the ORIF group (p = 0.829). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that ORIF is an acceptable treatment option for patients with B2 or B3 PFF, especially for those with severe medical comorbidities and reduced physical status who may not tolerate revision arthroplasty. However, further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is needed to confirm these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The application of proximal tibial anterior closing wedge osteotomy in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Introduction: Posterior tibial slope (PTS) plays a vital role in knee stability. PTS of more than 12° may be considered with increased strain on the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) fibers. To handle the instability caused by changes in PTS degree, Proximal Tibial Anterior Closing Wedge Osteotomy (PT-ACWO) is adopted by surgeons. Methods: Between October 2015 and October 2019, our department conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who experienced anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) graft failures, with a particular focus on pathological PTS. The time from initial ACLR to revision ranged from 1 to 10 years, with a mean of 2.5 years. Radiological assessments of PTS were conducted, and outcomes were quantified using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale. The surgical technique and the use of 3D Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) were outlined. Preoperative imaging included the use of Kirschner wires to establish tibial plateau reference points, and 3D-PSI was employed to guide the location and depth of the tibial osteotomy, which was performed obliquely. In a notable instance, a novel tibial tunnel was mapped out, and ortho-bridge system (OBS) fixation was utilized to ensure adequate space for the new tunnel. Results: In a cohort of seven patients with a mean follow-up of 28.1 months, a significant reduction in PTS was noted postoperatively (median [interquartile range, IQR], from 15.27° [13.46°, 16.60°] to 6.25° [5.89°, 6.78°]; P = 0.002). IKDC score improved to 85.10 (80.25, 88.10), P < 0.001; the Lysholm score to 88.00 (73.00, 90.50), P < 0.001; and the Tegner score to 8.00 (7.20, 8.05), P = 0.025 at final follow-up. Skin incision healing delays occurred in two instances, yet achieved closure by six weeks. Radiographs at three months demonstrated faster bone healing in oblique osteotomies than transverse ones. Knee joint stability was maintained, with no additional complications or evidence of instability noted. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed graft integrity in all patients, without signs of enlargement or mispositioning at last observation. Conclusion: An augmented PTS angle exceeding 12 may constitute a potential etiology for the failure of ACLR grafts. In such patients, the implementation of ACLR combined with PT-ACWO could mitigate the risk of surgical failure during initial ACLR or subsequent revision procedures.

Isolated Mediastinal Goitre: A Case Report.

Retrosternal goitre is not an uncommon entity owing to various reasons - ignorance, fear, lack of access to safe surgical technique, incomplete thyroid surgery. Retrosternal goitre could have varied presentations, especially in cases with prior thyroid surgery. Fifty-three-year-old female with history of thyroid surgery 20 years back presented with a large neglected anterior neck swelling. Computed tomography imaging revealed the rare entity of an isolated mediastinal goitre type 3 with no communication with the cervical thyroid gland. Careful evaluation of computed tomography and pathology indicated the need for extra - cervical approach. Patient underwent total thyroidectomy and mediastinal goitre excision via cervical and median sternotomy approach. Post operative histopathology revealed benign adenomatous goitre. CT imaging of retrosternal goitre is of primary importance along with appropriate CT grading. Mediastinal seeding of thyroid goitre could occur in cases with prior thyroid surgery. Extra cervical approaches for primary mediastinal goitre are recommended. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-024-04663-2.

Functional Outcomes and a Review of Management Options for Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Introduction: Increase in the number of primary shoulder arthroplasty has led to an increase in the number of revisions which presents many complex challenges and often has inferior outcomes. Materials and Methods: Data was collected retrospectively, and patients were classified using Dines classification. Comprehensive case reviews were done to identify preoperative and intra-operative challenges. The primary outcome measure was Oxford shoulder score (OSS). The secondary measures were range of motion (ROM) and patient satisfaction (very satisfied, satisfied, not satisfied or worse). Results: A total of 32 patients were identified with a mean age of 67.64 years and the most common cause of revision was a combination of bone and soft tissue failure (39.3%). All patients (n=8) with hemiarthroplasty had rotator cuff deficiency while patients with resurfacing had both rotator cuff failure and bony erosion. Four patients needed a proximal humeral osteotomy and six patients needed allograft reconstruction of the glenoid for bone loss. Twenty-one shoulders were revised to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), 2 to anatomical TSA and 5 were left with cement spacer in situ. Mean duration of follow-up was 41.6 months. Mean OSS at the last follow-up was 26.88 with statistically significant improvement in ROM. There was no statistical difference in clinical outcomes (p>0.05) based on the type of primary prosthesis or cause of revision. A total of 70% patients were pain free. Patients with infection had inferior outcomes with a mean OSS of 17. Conclusion: Management of patients with failed shoulder arthroplasty is often challenging but has good clinical outcome except in infections.

Periprosthetic Transpatellar Fracture Replacement With Autogenous Iliac Graft: A Technical Note.

Periprosthetic fractures involving total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components, particularly involving the patella, can present a significant challenge regarding orthopedic surgery. This technical note outlines an approach for the reconstruction of complicated periprosthetic transpatellar fractures, with poor bone stock, utilizing autogenous iliac graft. This kind of procedure requires careful preoperative evaluation of imaging, precise intraoperative planning, and strict postoperative management to achieve adequate postoperative results. The inventive option of utilizing an autogenous iliac graft for reconstruction suggests its potential benefits in addressing the unique biomechanical demands of patellar fractures in TKA patients with poor bone stock. Key technical aspects of this approach are highlighted and include graft harvest, graft preparation, and fixation techniques. Overall, this technique can provide a golden standard bailout for periprosthetic transpatellar fracture reconstruction and potentially offer orthopedic surgeons a comprehensive framework for addressing this challenging clinical scenario.

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Relatively High His-Bundle Capture Threshold After Permanent His-Bundle Pacing　- A Multicenter Clinical Study.

Background: Outcomes in patients with relatively high His-bundle (HB) capture thresholds at implantation are unknown. This study aimed to compare changes in the HB capture threshold and prognosis between patients with a relatively high threshold and those with a low threshold. Methods and Results: Forty-nine patients who underwent permanent HB pacing (HBP) were divided into two groups: low (<1.25 V at 1.0 ms; n=35) and high (1.25-2.49 V; n=14) baseline HB capture threshold groups. The HB capture threshold was evaluated at implantation, and after 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter. HB capture threshold rise was defined as threshold rise ≥1.0 V at 1.0 ms compared with implantation measures. We compared outcomes between the groups. During a mean follow-up period of 34.6 months, the high-threshold group showed a trend toward a higher incidence of HB capture threshold of ≥2.5 V (50% vs. 14%; P=0.023), HBP abandonment (29% vs. 8.6%; P=0.091), lead revision (21% vs. 2.9%; P=0.065), and clinical events (all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, and new-onset or progression of atrial fibrillation; 50% vs. 23%; P=0.089) than the low-threshold group. A baseline HB capture threshold of ≥1.25V was an independent predictor of clinical events. Conclusions: A relatively high HB capture threshold is associated with increased risk of HBP abandonment, lead revision, and poor clinical outcomes.

Methodological evaluation of systematic reviews based on the use of artificial intelligence systems in chest radiography.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, systems that use artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging have been developed, such as the interpretation of chest X-ray to rule out pathology. This has produced an increase in systematic reviews (SR) published on this topic. This article aims to evaluate the methodological quality of SRs that use AI for the diagnosis of thoracic pathology by simple chest X-ray. MATERIAL AND METHODS: SRs evaluating the use of AI systems for the automatic reading of chest X-ray were selected. Searches were conducted (from inception to May 2022): PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Two investigators selected the reviews. From each SR, general, methodological and transparency characteristics were extracted. The PRISMA statement for diagnostic tests (PRISMA-DTA) and AMSTAR-2 were used. A narrative synthesis of the evidence was performed. Protocol registry: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/4b6u2/. RESULTS: After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 7 SRs were selected (mean of 36 included studies per review). All the included SRs evaluated "deep learning" systems in which chest X-ray was used for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. Only 2 (29%) SRs indicated the existence of a review protocol. None of the SRs specified the design of the included studies or provided a list of excluded studies with their justification. Six (86%) SRs mentioned the use of PRISMA or one of its extensions. The risk of bias assessment was performed in 4 (57%) SRs. One (14%) SR included studies with some validation of AI techniques. Five (71%) SRs presented results in favour of the diagnostic capacity of the intervention. All SRs were rated "critically low" following AMSTAR-2 criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The methodological quality of SRs that use AI systems in chest radiography can be improved. The lack of compliance in some items of the tools used means that the SRs published in this field must be interpreted with caution.

Radiological Landmarks for Joint Line Level in Challenging Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

Background: Although Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA) is primarily performed for post-traumatic ankle arthritis with joint disruption, anatomical landmarks for Joint Line (JL) level are typically preserved. However, severe Post-Traumatic Bone Loss (PTBL) or TAA revision may render some landmarks unidentifiable, challenging JL restoration. Methods: Patients undergoing customized TAA for severe PTBL or revision were enrolled. Custom-made implants, based on 3D CT scans, were designed to address bone defects and provide adequate bone support. Evaluated parameters, measured on bilateral ankle weight-bearing radiographs taken preoperatively and 6-8 months postoperatively, included JL Height Ratio (JLHR) and the distances from JL to the Lateral Malleolus apex (LM-JL), the posterior colliculus of the Medial Malleolus (MM-JL), and the Gissane Calcaneal Sulcus (CS-JL). Reproducibility and variability were assessed, and comparisons were made between radiological parameters measured at TAA and those at the contralateral ankle. Results: Thirteen patients were included. Intra- and interobserver reliability demonstrated excellent values. The least variability was observed in the LM-JL distance. Statistically significant correlations were found between CS-JL and MM-JL distances in the operated limb and between the CS-JL of the operated limb and the contralateral ankle. While TAA parameters did not show statistically significant differences compared with the contralateral ankle, a trend toward proximalization of the JL was noted. Conclusions: This study demonstrated good reproducibility of the analyzed parameters for evaluating JL in TAA among patients with severe PTBL or undergoing revision surgery. However, these parameters cannot be deemed fully reliable. Given their potential weaknesses, it is crucial to identify more reproducible values, preferably ratios.

Impact of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on outcomes following aseptic and septic revision total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of the 2005-2018 nationwide inpatient sample.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can adversely affect surgical outcomes, and the impact on revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes is unclear. This study aimed to explore the impact of SLE on in-patient outcomes of revision TKA. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2005 to 2018 was searched for patients aged ≥ 18 years old who received revision TKA. Patients with and without SLE were propensity score matched (PSM) at a 1:4 ratio. Associations between SLE and in-hospital outcomes were examined using regression analyses. The study included 133,054 patients, with 794 having SLE. After 1:4 PSM, data of 3,970 patients were analyzed (SLE, 794; non-SLE, 3,176). Multivariate-adjusted analyses revealed that SLE patients had a significantly higher risk of postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.44, p = 0.011), non-routine discharge (aOR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.02-1.46, p = 0.028), major blood loss (aOR = 1.19), respiratory failure/mechanical ventilation (aOR = 1.79), acute kidney injury (AKI) (aOR = 1.47), and wound dehiscence (aOR = 2.09). SLE patients also had a longer length of hospital stay (aBeta = 0.31) and greater total hospital costs (aBeta = 6.35) compared to non-SLE patients. Among those with aseptic failure, SLE patients had a significantly higher risk of postoperative complications (aOR = 1.23) and non-routine discharge (aOR = 1.36). SLE is independently associated with worse in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing revision TKA. This study highlights the importance of heightened vigilance and tailored perioperative management for patients undergoing major surgeries in the background of SLE. Key Points • SLE significantly increases the risk of non-routine discharge, major blood loss, respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, and wound dehiscence, in patients undergoing aseptic and septic revision TKA. • Patients with SLE experience longer hospital stays and higher hospital costs compared to those without SLE. • The study's findings highlight the necessity for healthcare providers to consider the presence of SLE as a critical factor in preoperative planning and postoperative care to improve outcomes in revision TKA patients.