ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare outcomes in patients with repeated implantation failure undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection/In vitro fertilization (IVF/ICSI) plus immunosuppressants such as prednisolone, prednisone, or cyclosporine A versus the use of IVF/ICSI alone. Data source: Databases were systematically searched in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases in September 2023. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials and observational studies with the outcomes of interest were included. Data collect: We computed odds ratios (ORs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.The main outcomes were live birth, miscarriage, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy, and biochemical pregnancy. Data synthesis: Seven studies with 2,829 patients were included. Immunosuppressive treatments were used in 1,312 (46.37%). Cyclosporine A improved implantation rate (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.01-2.18) and clinical pregnancy (1.89, 95% CI 1.14-3.14). Compared to non-immunosuppressive treatment, prednisolone and prednisone did not improve live birth (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.88-1.46) and miscarriage (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.07-2.09). Prednisolone showed no significant effect in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI, clinical pregnancy (OR 1.34; 95% CI 0.76-2.36), or implantation rate (OR 1.36; 95% CI 0.76-2.42). Conclusion: Cyclosporine A may promote implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. However, given the limited sample size, it is important to approach these findings with caution. Our results indicate that prednisolone and prednisone do not have any beneficial effects on clinical outcomes of IVF/ICSI patients with repeated implantation failure. PROSPERO: CRD42023449655.
Subject(s)
Embryo Implantation , Immunosuppressive Agents , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Pregnancy Rate , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Prednisolone/administration & dosage , Prednisone/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) is a rare autoimmune disease. Although dapsone is the initial treatment, other immunomodulators are used in resistant cases or when dapsone is unavailable. CASE REPORT: A 12-year-old Mexican child, with no relevant medical history, developed in May 2023 a disseminated dermatosis affecting all body segments, including mucous membranes, characterized by erythematous patches and plaques evolving into the formation of serous and serosanguinous blisters and vesicles, distributed in a "string of pearls" pattern. LABD was suspected and confirmed by skin biopsy, which showed a subepidermal blister with neutrophilic infiltration and linear Immunoglobulin A deposits at the dermo-epidermal junction by direct immunofluorescence. Treatment with prednisone (2 mg/kg/day) and cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/day) resulted in improvement and lesion remission within 2 weeks. Both drugs needed to be discontinued for 3 months due to intermittent blistering. Cyclosporine was continued as maintenance therapy at a dose of 4 mg/kg/day for 8 months. CONCLUSIONS: The report highlights the use of cyclosporine as an alternative immunomodulator for DAAL, an immunosuppressive agent used in autoimmune disorders. Few cases, including this one, have described complete remission and control of the dermatosis with cyclosporine, accompanied by prednisone at the start of treatment.
INTRODUCCIÓN: La dermatosis ampollosa por IgA lineal es una enfermedad autoinmunitaria rara. Aunque la dapsona es el tratamiento inicial, se usan otros inmunomoduladores en casos resistentes o cuando la dapsona no está disponible. CASO CLÍNICO: Un niño mexicano de 12 años, sin antecedentes relevantes, desarrolló en mayo de 2023 una dermatosis diseminada a todos los segmentos corporales, incluyendo las mucosas, caracterizada por manchas y placas eritematosas que evolucionaron hacia la formación de ampollas y vesículas serosas y serohemáticas, distribuidas en forma de «cadena de perlas¼. Se sospechó dermatosis ampollosa por IgA lineal y se confirmó mediante biopsia cutánea, que mostró una ampolla subepidérmica con infiltrado neutrófilo y depósitos lineales de IgA en la unión dermoepidérmica mediante inmunofluorescencia directa. El tratamiento con prednisona (2 mg/kg al día) y ciclosporina (5 mg/kg al día) resultó en mejoría y la remisión de las lesiones a las 2 semanas. Fue necesario dejar ambos fármacos durante 3 meses debido a la aparición intermitente de ampollas. Se dejó ciclosporina como terapia de mantenimiento a dosis de 4 mg/kg al día por 8 meses. CONCLUSIONES: El reporte destaca el uso de ciclosporina como inmunomodulador alternativo para la dermatosis ampollosa por IgA lineal, un agente inmunosupresor utilizado en trastornos autoinmunitarios. Pocos casos, incluido este, han descrito la remisión completa y el control de la dermatosis con ciclosporina, acompañada de prednisona al inicio del tratamiento.
Subject(s)
Cyclosporine , Immunosuppressive Agents , Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis , Prednisone , Humans , Cyclosporine/administration & dosage , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Child , Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis/drug therapy , Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis/diagnosis , Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis/pathology , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Drug Therapy, Combination , Treatment Outcome , MexicoABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion. RESULTS: All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy. CONCLUSION: This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.
Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents , Lupus Nephritis , Societies, Medical , Lupus Nephritis/diagnosis , Lupus Nephritis/drug therapy , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil , Creatinine/blood , Proteinuria/diagnosis , Proteinuria/etiology , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Rheumatology/standards , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Biopsy , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Leflunomide/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Remission Induction , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Evidence-Based Medicine , Consensus , Disease Progression , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for pregnancy outcomes and construct a prognostic model for pregnancy outcomes in women with Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions (RSA) treated with cyclosporin A. METHODS: A total of 154 RSA patients treated with cyclosporin A between October 2016 and October 2018 were retrospectively recruited. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify the prognostic factors for pregnancy success in RSA women treated with cyclosporin A. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to construct prognostic value, and the prognostic performance was assessed using area under the ROC. RESULTS: After adjusting potential confounding factors, the authors noted increased age (OR = 0.771; 95 % CI 0.693â0.858; p < 0.001) and positive antinuclear antibodies (OR = 0.204; 95 % CI 0.079â0.526; p = 0.001) were associated with a reduced incidence of pregnancy success, while positive anti-ß2 glycoprotein-I-antibody (OR = 21.941; 95 % CI 1.176â409.281; p = 0.039) was associated with an increased incidence of pregnancy success after treated with cyclosporin A. The AUC of combining these variables for predicting pregnancy failure was 0.809 (95 % CI 0.735â0.880). CONCLUSIONS: This study systematically identified the prognostic factors for pregnancy success in women treated with cyclosporin A, and the constructed prognostic model based on these factors with relatively higher prognostic value. Further large-scale prospective studies should be performed to validate the prognostic value of the constructed model.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Habitual , Cyclosporine , Immunosuppressive Agents , Pregnancy Outcome , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Abortion, Habitual/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , ROC Curve , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate cost-effective pharmacological treatment in adult kidney transplant recipients from the perspective of the Colombian health system. METHODS: A decision tree model for the induction phase and a Markov model for the maintenance phase were built. A review of the clinical literature was conducted to extract probabilities, and the life-years were used as the outcome. Costs were calculated using the administrative databases. The evaluating treatment schemes are organized by groups of evidence with direct comparisons. RESULTS: In the induction phase, anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin+ methylprednisolone is dominant, more effective, and less expensive, compared with basiliximab+methylprednisolone. In the maintenance phase, azathioprine (AZA) is dominant in contrast to mycophenolate mofetil (MFM) both with cyclosporine (CIC)+ corticosteroids (CE); CIC is dominant relative to sirolimus (SIR) and tacrolimus (TAC) (both with MFM+CE or AZA+CE), and TAC is dominant compared with SIR (in addition with MFM+CE or mycophenolate sodium [MFS]+CE); MFM is dominant in relation to MFS and everolimus, and SIR is more effective MFM but it does not exceed the threshold (in sum with TAC+CE); MFS and MFM are dominant relative to everolimus, and SIR is more effective than MFM, but it does not exceed the threshold (in addiction with CIC+CE); MFM is dominant in relation to TAC (in sum with SIR+CE), and CIC+AZA+CE is dominant in relation to TAC+MFM+CE. CONCLUSIONS: The base-case results for all evidence groups are consistent with the different sensitivity analyses.
Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents , Kidney Transplantation , Adult , Humans , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/economics , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Azathioprine/economics , Colombia , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/economics , Decision Trees , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Graft Rejection/economics , Immunosuppressive Agents/economics , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation/economics , Markov Chains , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Mycophenolic Acid/economics , Sirolimus/therapeutic use , Sirolimus/economics , Tacrolimus/economics , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical dataSubject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Cyclosporine , Dermatitis, Atopic , Nephrotic Syndrome , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Nephrotic Syndrome/drug therapy , Nephrotic Syndrome/complications , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Male , Child , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Child, PreschoolABSTRACT
The treatment of aplastic anemia (AA) has significantly advanced in the last 50 years, evolving from a fatal condition to one where survival rates now exceed 80-85%. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) have become the primary treatments, with the latter widely adopted due to factors like the scarcity of compatible donors, patient age, comorbidities, and limited HSCT access. A therapy breakthrough was the introduction of antithymocyte globulin (ATG), with its effectiveness further boosted by cyclosporine. However, it took years to achieve another major milestone in management. Initially, treatments aimed to intensify immunosuppression following the success of the ATG-cyclosporine combination, but these methods fell short of expectations. A major turning point was combining immunosuppression with stem cell stimulation, surpassing the efficacy of IST alone. Earlier, growth factors had shown limited success in AA treatment, but thrombopoietin receptor agonists represented a significant advancement. Initially applied alone as salvage, these were later combined with IST, forming the most effective current regimen for medically managing SAA. Horse ATG is the preferred formulation combined with cyclosporine and eltrombopag. This progress in AA treatment offers improved outcomes for patients afflicted with this once-lethal disease.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Aplastic , Immunosuppressive Agents , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Anemia, Aplastic/drug therapy , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Immunosuppression Therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Kidney transplantation remains the optimal therapy for many patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Chronic pain is one of the most common and distressing symptoms among patients with ESKD, and its treatment is a complex and challenging task to accomplish. The benefits of cannabidiol (CBD) in chronic pain treatment have been reported recently. Cannabidiol is metabolized by cytochrome P450, mainly CYP3A4 and CYP2C19, and can also undergo direct conjugation via UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzymes, with a growing body of evidence suggesting it is also a potent inhibitor or inducer of these pathways. Cannabidiol was also found to be a potent inhibitor of carboxylesterases in vitro. Because cytochrome P450 enzymes and carboxylesterases are also responsible for the clearance and activation of immunosuppressants, respectively, drug-drug interactions are likely to occur. Here, we report a pharmacokinetic drug interaction between CBD and cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil in a patient with ESKD with a kidney transplantation. It is thus crucial to take into account these interactions and monitor drug levels to avoid drug toxicity or a lack of efficacy. This study is in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Declaration of Istanbul.
Subject(s)
Cannabidiol , Chronic Pain , Humans , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Cannabidiol/therapeutic use , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System , Drug Interactions , Carboxylic Ester HydrolasesABSTRACT
Rosacea is a chronic and inflammatory disease that primarily affects the skin, although more than half of cases also present with ocular symptoms ranging from blepharitis to conjunctivitis and keratitis. It represents a frequent reason for consultation with a psychosocial impact, affecting quality of life, and requires management involving ophthalmologists, dermatologists, and primary care physicians. For this paper, a search was conducted in several databases, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, using the MeSH term "rosacea" in conjunction with other relevant keywords such as "ocular rosacea", "management", "treatment", and "guidelines". Available articles were reviewed. International and local guidelines recommend initiating the management of rosacea with lifestyle changes, including ocular hygiene and avoidance of triggers. Topical or oral treatment is recommended as the next step, with topical cyclosporine, topical azithromycin, topical tacrolimus, and oral doxycycline being the treatments most supported by evidence. Combination treatments are also recommended. Current management guidelines mainly focus on cutaneous manifestations, generating few guidelines on ophthalmologic treatment, and most recommendations are issued by experts. This work compares local and international treatment guidelines for rosacea, as well as other available medical literature, and suggests a practical and interdisciplinary treatment scheme for ocular involvement based on the reviewed bibliography.
Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis , Rosacea , Humans , Quality of Life , Rosacea/drug therapy , Doxycycline , Cyclosporine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological treatment in maintenance therapy for adult heart transplant recipients from the Colombian health system perspective. METHODS: We constructed a decision tree model with a 1-year time horizon. A review of the clinical literature was performed to extract probabilities of health events and acute rejections avoided were used as the health outcome. Costs were calculated from the base-case approximation and were obtained from administrative databases in Colombia (Sistema de Información de Precios de Medicamentos 2020 and Suficiencia 2012-2019), and the prices were adjusted to US dollar 2021. RESULTS: Two evaluation results were presented. The first evaluates the tacrolimus + azathioprine + corticosteroid (TAC) scheme compared with cyclosporine + azathioprine + corticosteroid (CAC), in which the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio indicates that 1 additional rejection avoided has a cost of US dollar $5461.09 which, compared with the cost-effectiveness threshold in the base case, indicates that the TAC scheme is not a cost-effective (CE) strategy with respect to the CAC scheme. The second result shows the comparison of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil + corticosteroid (TMC) with cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetil + corticosteroid (CMC) in which TMC was found to be a dominant alternative to CMC. CONCLUSIONS: The tacrolimus-based immunosuppression scheme is not CE in its TAC scheme, versus CAC, and is dominant in its TMC scheme, versus CMC, sensitivity analyses show that tacrolimus could become a CE alternative in any scheme used against higher cost-effectiveness threshold.
Subject(s)
Heart Transplantation , Tacrolimus , Adult , Humans , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Colombia , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Immunosuppression Therapy , Adrenal Cortex HormonesABSTRACT
Tecnologia: Dupilumabe e upadacitinibe. Comparadores: Azatioprina, metotrexato, ciclosporina, micofenolato de mofetila. Indicação: Tratamento de dermatite atópica severa em pacientes adultos. Pergunta: Dupilumabe e upadacitinibe são mais eficazes e tão seguros quanto ciclosporina ou outros agentes imunossupressores para obter os desfechos de saúde no tratamento sistêmico de dermatite atópica moderada a grave refratária à terapia atópica? Métodos: Levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado na base de dados PUBMED e Cochrane Library, seguindo estratégias de buscas predefinidas. Foi feita avaliação da qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas com a ferramenta AMSTAR2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Version 2). Resultados: Foram selecionados três estudos que atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Conclusão: Dupilumabe, upadacitinibe, ciclosporina e azatioprina são mais eficazes que placebo nos desfechos de eficácia (reduzir sinais clínicos em escalas, reduzir sintomas em escalas) para tratamento da dermatite atópica moderada a grave refratária à terapia tópica, mas esses medicamentos não diferem entre si. Dupilumabe, upadacitinibe, ciclosporina e azatioprina são bem tolerados e seguros
Technology: Dupilumab, upadacitinibe. Comparators: Azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil. Indication: Treatment of severe atopic dermatitis in adult patients. Question: Are dupilumab and upadacitinib more effective and as safe as cyclosporine or other immunosuppressive agents for achieving health outcomes in the systemic treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis refractory to atopic therapy? Methods: A bibliographic survey was done in the PUBMED e Cochrane Library databases, following predefined search strategies. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 tool (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Version 2). Results: Three studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. Conclusion: Dupilumab, upadacitinib, cyclosporine, and azathioprine are more effective than placebo on efficacy endpoints (reduce clinical signs on scales, reduce symptoms on scales) for treating moderate to severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy, but these drugs do not differ from each other. Dupilumab, upadacitinib, cyclosporine, and azathioprine are well tolerated and safe
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Janus Kinase InhibitorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) is a validated and widely accepted statistical method that derives indirect comparisons between treatments when head-to-head studies have not been performed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of OC-01 varenicline nasal spray (OC-01 VNS) 0.03 mg to cyclosporine A (CsA) 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion on tear production in patients with dry eye disease based on data from the respective phase 3 clinical trials using the MAIC technique. METHODS: Individual patient data were drawn from the phase 3 registry trial of OC-01 VNS; aggregate data were drawn from 2 phase 3 trials of CsA in the publicly available New Drug Application for CsA 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion (RESTASIS). Using unanchored MAIC methods, the individual patient data were weighted based on 4 clinically relevant baseline variables (age, race, sex, and baseline Schirmer test score [STS]) to produce a weighted OC-01 VNS dataset matched to the key demographics of the CsA dataset. Least-squares mean change from baseline in STS for OC-01 VNS was calculated using the identical analysis of variance model used to calculate the same value for CsA in the RESTASIS New Drug Application, which were then compared. Proportions of subjects with improvement of 10 mm or more from baseline in STS were compared in the weighted OC-01 VNS and CsA dataset. Time points available for comparisons were CsA trials at 3 and 6 months and OC-01 data at 2 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: Data from 511 subjects in the OC-01 VNS phase 3 trial and 585 in the CsA phase 3 trials were analyzed. The least-squares mean STS change from baseline for OC-01 VNS at 2 and 4 weeks was significantly higher than that for CsA at 3 and 6 months (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Mean STS improvements were approximately 6-7 mm for OC-01 VNS and approximately 1 mm for CsA. The proportion of subjects with improvement of 10 mm or more from baseline in STS was significantly higher for OC-01 VNS (50.2%) than CsA (11.7 and 17.1% in the 2 CsA studies; P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: This MAIC analysis demonstrates OC-01 VNS produces significantly greater improvement in mean STS and results in significantly greater numbers of patients with substantial improvement in STS (percentage ≥ 10 mm) compared with CsA. Together, absent more robust data from head-to-head trials, findings may suggest a potentially greater magnitude of improvement achieved with OC-01 VNS compared with CsA for the treatment of dry eye disease within conditions of the analysis methodology. DISCLOSURES: Dr Visco was a consultant for Novartis, Allergan, and Oyster Point, Inc. Ms Hendrix and Drs Macsai and Gibson are employees and shareholders for Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. Drs Sun and Tam participated in clinical research and received funding from Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc sponsored the Phase 3 OC-01 (varenicine solution) clinical study from which analysis data are obtained.
Subject(s)
Cyclosporine , Dry Eye Syndromes , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Dry Eye Syndromes/drug therapy , Emulsions/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Nasal Sprays , Ophthalmic Solutions/therapeutic use , Tears , Treatment Outcome , Varenicline/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The degree of immunosuppression required for adequate graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention, while keeping an adequate graft-versus-leukemia effect, in children with acute leukemia has not been established. We report the results of a retrospective comparison of cyclosporine levels and relapse rate in children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS: Patients <21 y/o with ALL in remission who underwent TBI-based hematopoietic cell transplantation from related or unrelated donors between 2008 and 2021 were included. Cyclosporine levels were measured twice a week and we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) from D0 to D + 7, D + 14, and D + 21. RESULTS: We included 76 patients. There was a trend towards a lower incidence of relapse in patients with a mean AUC < 200 ng/ml at D + 21 (HR = 0.41; p = .08). The 5-year relapse rate was 26.9% for patients with a mean AUC < 200 ng/ml at D + 21 and 43.9% for patients with a mean AUC≥200 ng/ml at D + 21. Relapse protection was restricted to relapses happening after D + 120 (HR = 0.21; p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show evidence that pediatric patients with ALL might benefit from lower cyclosporine levels between D0 and D + 21 without a detectable increase in GVHD. Large prospective studies comparing different cyclosporine levels are awaited.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Child , Chronic Disease , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/complications , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
Abstract Peripheral nerve damage is an important cause of seeking medical attention. It occurs when the continuity of structures is interrupted and the propagation of nervous impulses is blocked, affecting the functional capacity of individuals. To assess the effects of the immunosuppressants tacrolimus and cyclosporine on the regeneration of peripheral nerves, a systematic review of the literature was carried out. The articles included were published until September 2018 and proposed to evaluate the effects of the immunosuppressants tacrolimus and cyclosporine on nerve regeneration and neuroprotection, available in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Oxford Pain Relief Database, and LILACS databases. The research analysed a total of 56 articles, of which 22 were included in the meta-analysis. Statistical analysis suggests the protective effect of tacrolimus in the regeneration of the number of myelinated axons (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-2.39; p< 0.01); however, such effect was not observed in relation to cyclosporine (95%CI: - 0.38-1.18; p» 0.08) It also suggests that there is a significant relationship between the use of tacrolimus and myelin thickness (95%CI» 2.00-5.71; p< 0. 01). The use of immunosuppressants in the regeneration of peripheral nerve damage promotes an increase in the number of myelinated axons in general, regardless of the administered dose. In addition, it ensures greater myelin thickness, muscle weight and recovery of the sciatic functional index. However, heterogeneity was high in most analyses performed.
Resumo As lesões nervosas periféricas são uma causa importante de busca por atendimento médico. Elas ocorrem quando há a interrupção da continuidade das estruturas e do bloqueio da propagação dos impulsos nervosos, afetando a capacidade funcional dos indivíduos. Para avaliar os efeitos dos imunossupressores tacrolimus e ciclosporina na regeneração de nervos periféricos, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Foram incluídos artigos publicados até setembro de 2018, que se propunham avaliar os efeitos dos imunossupressores tacrolimus e ciclosporina na regeneração nervosa e neuroproteção, disponíveis nas bases de dados MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Oxford Pain Relief Database e LILACS. A pesquisa analisou um total de 56 artigos, dos quais 22 foram para metanálise. A análise estatística sugere o efeito protetor do tacrolimus na regeneração do número de axônios mielinizados (intervalo de confiança [IC] 95%: 0,93-2,39; p< 0,01); todavia tal efeito não foi observado em relação à ciclosporina (IC95%: - 0,38-1,18; p» 0,08). Ela também sugere haver uma relação significativa entre o uso do tacrolimus e a espessura da mielina (IC95%: 2,00-5,71; p< 0,01). O uso de imunossupressores na regeneração de lesão nervosa periférica promove um aumento no número de axônios mielinizados de forma geral, independentemente da dose administrada. Além disso, garante uma maior espessura da mielina, um maior peso muscular e restabelecimento do índice da função do nervo ciático. Todavia, a heterogeneidade foi alta na maioria das análises realizadas.
Subject(s)
Peripheral Nerves/pathology , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Nerve Regeneration/drug effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis (PsO) according to different treatments for their skin: topics/no treatment, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (cDMARDs) or biological DMARDs (bDMARDs). METHODS: Patients with PsO without PsA followed at a university hospital were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were classified according to their treatment in topics (topics, phototherapy or no treatment), cDMARDs (methotrexate and cyclosporine) and bDMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin 17 inhibitors (IL-17i) and IL-12-23i ((interleukin (IL) 12/IL-23 inhibitor))) groups. Incident cases of PsA were attributed to one treatment if developed during the administration of that treatment. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the adjusted risk of PsA development by treatment group. RESULTS: 1719 patients with PsO contributed a total of 14 721 patient/years (py). 1387 (81%) patients were in the topics, 229 (13%) in cDMARDs and 103 (6%) in the bDMARDs group. During follow-up, 239 patients (14%) developed PsA (231 under topics, six under cDMARDs and two under bDMARDs). Global incidence was 1.6 per 100 py. The risk of developing PsA in patients with PsO treated with bDMARDs was significantly lower (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.26; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.94; p=0.0111), compared with topics, but not compared with cDMARDs (IRR=0.35; 95% CI 0.035 to 1.96; p=0.1007). Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that male sex, nail involvement and higher body max index were associated with increased risk of developing PsA, while biologics use was protective (HR: 0.19; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.81). CONCLUSION: Treatment with biologics in patients with PsO reduced the risk of PsA development.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Psoriatic/epidemiology , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Argentina/epidemiology , Body Mass Index , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Electronic Health Records , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Male , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Nail Diseases/etiology , Phototherapy , Psoriasis/complications , Psoriasis/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Ustekinumab/therapeutic use , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of topical cyclosporine 0.1% and bevacizumab on experimentally induced corneal neovascularization in a rat model. METHODS: A total of 30 adult Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this experimental study. The central cornea of the rats was cauterized chemically. The rats were randomly enrolled into three groups as follows: Group 1 received bevacizumab 1%, Group 2 received cyclosporine 0.1%, and Group 3 received isotonic saline twice a day for 28 days. Slit-lamp examination of all rats was performed at the 3rd and 28th day. The rats were then sacrificed, and the corneas were excised. The number of blood vessels, state of inflammation, and collagen formation were evaluated histopathologically in the corneal sections. RESULTS: Corneal opacity and edema grades were significantly lower in Group 2 than in Group 3 (p=0.04 and 0.00, respectively). In the histopathological examination, Group 2 demonstrated significantly lesser number of blood vessels than Group 3 (p=0.001). Regarding collagen formation, Group 2 exhibited more regular collagen formation than Groups 1 and 3 (p=0.03). Inflammation grades were significantly lower in Groups 1 and 2 than in Group 3 (p=0.014 and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Topical bevacizumab is effective in inhibiting newly formed corneal neovascularization. The topical cyclosporine 0.1% treatment appears to be more effective than the topical bevacizumab treatment.
Subject(s)
Corneal Neovascularization , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Animals , Corneal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Disease Models, Animal , Rats , Rats, Sprague-DawleyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This case report describes an 8 year old boy unsuccessfully treated for years for Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis. CASE REPORT: We report a VKC resistant to all types of treatment known in the literature, such as topical and oral corticosteroids, topical and oral cyclosporine, immunotherapy, and third generation anti-histamine eye drops, due to unknown HIV co-infection. During further laboratory tests, patient tested positive for HIV even though he did not present any clinical manifestation of HIV disease. Only after antiretroviral treatment was started the allergy symptoms completely regressed. CONCLUSION: This case report suggests considering investigation of HIV infection in patients with refractory allergic conjunctivitis.
Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Allergic , HIV Infections , Male , Humans , Child , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/etiology , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Ophthalmic Solutions , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic useABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of two different doses of topical cyclosporine A used in addition to artificial tears in the treatment of patients with meibomian dysfunction and secondary dry eye. Methods: Fifty patients aged 18 to 40 years, who presented to our clinic between June 2020 and June 2021 were included in our study. Patients were divided into two groups as Group A (topical cyclosporine A 0.05%) and Group B (topical cyclosporine A 0.1%). All the patients underwent a detailed ophthalmological examination, basal Ocular Surface Disease Index measurement, and Schirmer 1 and tear break-up time tests at all visits. Results: The mean age was 32±7.1 years in Group A and 30.7±8.5 years in Group B. In Group A, there were 15 women and ten men, and Group B consisted of 14 women and 11 men. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age and gender distribution (p>0.05). Schirmer 1 and tear break-up time results and Ocular Surface Disease Index score also did not significantly differ between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Cyclosporine A 0.05% and 0.1% eye drops were both seen to be effective in managing dry eye disease in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction.
RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar a eficácia clínica de duas doses diferentes de ciclosporina A tópica utilizada além da lágrima artificial no tratamento de pacientes com disfunção da glândula tarsal e olho seco secundário. Métodos: No estudo, foram incluídos 50 pacientes com idades entre 18 e 40 anos, que se apresentaram em nossa clínica entre junho de 2020 e junho de 2021. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos: Grupo A (ciclosporina A 0,05% tópica) e Grupo B (ciclosporina A 0,1% tópica). Todos os pacientes foram submetidos a um exame oftalmológico detalhado, medição basal do Índice de Doença da Superfície Ocular, e testes de Schirmer 1 e de tempo de ruptura em todas as visitas. Resultados: A idade média foi de 32±7,1 anos no Grupo A e 30,7±8,5 anos no Grupo B. No Grupo A, havia 15 mulheres e dez homens, e o Grupo B consistia de 14 mulheres e 11 homens. Não havia diferença significativa entre os grupos em termos de distribuição por idade e gênero (p>0,05). Os resultados do Schirmer 1 e do tempo de ruptura e do Índice de Doenças da Superfície Ocular também não apresentaram diferença significativa entre os grupos (p>0,05). Conclusão: Observou-se que os colírios de ciclosporina A 0,05% e 0,1% são eficazes no tratamento da síndrome do olho seco em pacientes com disfunção da glândula tarsal.