Clinician-to-clinician connectedness and access to gastric cancer surgery at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers.

BACKGROUND: For patients with gastric cancer, the pathway from primary care (PC) clinician to gastroenterologist to cancer specialist (medical oncologist or surgeons) is referral dependent. The impact of clinician connectedness on disparities in quality gastric cancer care, such as at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers (NCI-CC), remains underexplored. This study evaluated how clinician connectedness influences access to gastrectomy at NCI-CC. METHODS: Maryland's All-Payer Claims Database was used to evaluate 667 patients who underwent gastrectomy for cancer from 2013 to 2018. Two separate referral linkages, defined as ≥9 shared patients, were examined: (1) PC clinicians to gastroenterologists at NCI-CC and (2) gastroenterologists to cancer specialists at NCI-CC. Multiple logistic regression models determined associations between referral linkages and odds of undergoing gastrectomy at NCI-CC. RESULTS: Only 15% of gastrectomies were performed at NCI-CC. Patients of gastroenterologists with referral links to cancer specialists at NCI-CC were more likely to be <65 years, male, White, and privately insured. Every additional referral link between PC clinician and gastroenterologist at NCI-CC and between gastroenterologist and cancer specialist at NCI-CC increased the odds of gastrectomy at NCI-CC by 71% and 26%, respectively. Black patients had half the odds as White patients in receiving gastrectomy at NCI-CC; however, adjusting for covariates including clinician-to-clinician connectedness attenuated this observation. CONCLUSION: Patients of clinicians with low connectedness and Black patients are less likely to receive gastrectomy at NCI-CC. Enhancing clinician connectedness is necessary to address disparities in cancer care. These results are relevant to policy makers, clinicians, and patient advocates striving for health equity.

The Impact on Medical Student Stress in Relation to a Change in USMLE Step 1 Examination Score Reporting to Pass/Fail.

The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 was designed to be a benchmark measure of knowledge and has been used heavily in the residency application process. Step 1 has moved from 3-digit scoring to a pass/fail scoring system, in part to decrease the stress associated with the exam. Emerging literature suggests that this transition has led to other stresses for students. Our study compared student stress levels, both overall and in relation to Step 1, leading up to the exam between a scored cohort and pass/fail cohort. We administered to each cohort a 14-item survey that included demographics, the PSS-4 stress scale, and 6 other potential stressors. Data was analyzed using two-tailed t test for independent means and analysis of variance. We found that while there was no difference in general overall stress between the students who took Step 1 for a score and students who took Step 1 pass/fail, we did see differences in stress related to the Step 1 exam. Step 1 stress was significantly lower for the pass/fail cohort than the score cohort during the second year of medical education leading up to the exam. However, this difference in Step 1 stress between the cohorts disappeared by the dedicated study period immediately before the exam. The change in scoring appears to have decreased stress specifically related to Step 1, but this reduction was not sustained as students entered their study period to prepare for Step 1.

A retrospective cohort study comparing reconstructive techniques and outcomes in post-mastectomy triple negative breast cancer patients.

Background: Up to 42% of all breast cancer patients undergo post-mastectomy reconstruction, however reconstructive techniques have not been widely studied in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Reconstructive complications may delay adjuvant treatments; in TNBC, which inherently carries an increased risk of locoregional recurrence, this can greatly affect oncological outcomes. Therefore, we evaluate factors influencing choice of reconstructive techniques following mastectomy in TNBC patients and assess operative and oncologic safety outcomes. Methods: A single institution retrospective chart review identified TNBC patients who underwent post-mastectomy reconstruction between 2010 to 2020. Clinical characteristics collected included demographics, cancer history, reconstructive techniques [autologous-based reconstruction (ABR) vs. implant-based reconstruction (IBR)] and surgical and oncologic outcomes such as complications, recurrence, and mortality. Factors impacting whether patients underwent ABR versus IBR were assessed, as well as differences in outcomes between the two procedures. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05. Results: During the 10-year period, 52.9% (n=127) of all post-mastectomy TNBC patients (n=240) underwent breast reconstruction, most frequently immediately after mastectomy (97.0%). Most patients underwent IBR compared to ABR (82.4% vs. 14.5%). Patients undergoing ABR were older than IBR patients (54.3 vs. 46.4 years; P=0.040) and had a higher body mass index (BMI; 30.0 vs. 26.1 kg/m2; P=0.007). Patients more often pursued ABR if they had a prior breast cancer history (36.8% vs. 16.7%; P=0.041) or experienced TNBC recurrence (26.3% vs. 9.3%; P=0.034), while primary TNBC patients more often opted for IBR. Reconstructive type did not impact complications (ABR 31.6% vs. IBR 16.8%, P=0.131), recurrence (ABR 15.8% vs. IBR 13.0%, P=0.719), or mortality (ABR 0.0% vs. IBR 6.5%, P=0.593) rates. Conclusions: Factors such as age, BMI, and breast cancer history impacted choice of reconstructive technique among TNBC women. No differences in complications, recurrence, or mortality occur in these high-risk patients regardless of reconstructive technique, highlighting that neither ABR nor IBR is superior in regard to surgical and oncologic safety in post-mastectomy TNBC patients.

Clinical management of myoid hamartomas of the breast: A case report and literature review.

Background: Myoid Hamartoma of the breast (MHB) is an extremely rare benign breast lesion composed of mammary ducts and lobules, fibrous stroma, adipose tissue, and smooth muscle. Due to its rarity, the clinical management of MHB is not well described. Surgical excision is the most common form of management. This study reviews the current literature on the clinical management of MHB and describes a case report of a young patient presenting with MHB managed with surveillance and shared-decision making. Materials and methods: A healthy 23-year-old female presented with a one-year history of a palpable left breast mass. Her right breast exam was normal. Ultrasound of the left breast revealed a 2.7 cm × 1.4 cm × 2.4 cm lobulated mass at the one o'clock position. The mass caused slight discomfort to palpation but otherwise had no associated skin changes. Ultrasound-guided biopsy revealed a left breast myoid hamartoma. Management options were presented to the patient, and she elected to observe the mass with surveillance imaging. Results: There have been no reported cases in the literature of malignant transformation of MHB. Rather than rely on reflexive surgical excision of MHB, our review suggests that surveillance and routine imaging may be an appropriate form of clinical management in patients who present with a favorable clinical and histopathological profile which includes: a low MIB-1 proliferative index, low breast cancer risk assessment score, lesion size less than 1.2 cm, and radiological-pathological concordance. Conclusion: Further research is needed to determine the clinical significance and threshold levels of these clinical and histopathological factors in patient care. However, given current trends to minimize over treatment in breast pathology, we pose that observation of MHB can be performed when favorable clinical criteria is met.

Triple negative breast cancer and reconstruction: Predictors of recurrence, complications, and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Only 42% of all breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy elect for breast reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate factors impacting complications, recurrence, and mortality in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients undergoing reconstruction. METHODS: Reconstructive TNBC patients at a single institution from 2010 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, cancer characteristics, reconstruction choice, and complications were collected. Statistical significance was defined at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were identified. Average age was 47.8 years, 50.4% were Caucasian and 36.4% were African American. Most patients had invasive ductal carcinoma (90.8%), and most underwent nipple-sparing (41.2%) or skin-sparing (38.9%) mastectomies. Twenty-one patients (16.0%) experienced postoperative complications. Patients with complications tended to be older (52.1 versus 46.9 years, p = 0.052). At mean follow-up of 52.1 months, 14.5% experienced cancer recurrence and 5.3% died. Deceased patients were significantly younger at diagnosis (42.2 versus 48.5 years, p = 0.008) and had a lower BMI compared to surviving patients (21.2 versus 26.9 kg/m2; p = 0.014). Patients younger than age 45 years had higher Ki-67 than those older than 45 years (80.0% versus 60.0%, p = 0.013). Outcomes in autologous- versus implant-based reconstruction were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In TNBC post-mastectomy reconstruction patients, age and BMI were predictors of mortality while race, smoking history, reconstruction choice, or type of implant-based reconstruction had no significant effect on these outcomes. SYNOPSIS: The purpose of this study is to evaluate factors that impact complications, recurrence, and mortality in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients undergoing reconstruction. We identified BMI, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and age as predictors of complications, recurrence, and mortality in TNBC.

Postmastectomy Reconstruction in Male Breast Cancer.

Introduction: Less than 1% of all breast cancers are diagnosed in males. In females, postmastectomy breast reconstruction is associated with increased patient satisfaction. However, there is a paucity of literature describing reconstructive options for postmastectomy deformity in the male chest. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate postmastectomy reconstruction outcomes in males with breast cancer. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were queried for records pertaining to the study question using medical subject heading (MeSH) terms such as "male breast cancer," "mastectomy," and "reconstruction." No limitations were placed on the year of publication, country of origin, or study size. Study characteristics and patient demographics were collected. Primary outcomes of interest included postoperative complications, recurrence rate, and mortality rate. Results: A total of 11 articles examining 29 male patients with breast cancer who underwent postmastectomy reconstruction were included for analysis. Literature was most commonly available in the form of case reports. The average age was 59.6 +/-11.4 years. Reconstruction methods included fat grafting (n = 1, 3.4%), silicone implants (n = 1, 3.4%), and autologous chest wall reconstruction with local flaps (n = 26, 89.7%). Postoperative complications occurred in two patients (6.8%), including partial nipple necrosis (n = 1) and hypertrophic scarring (n = 1). Of the studies reporting patient satisfaction, all patients were pleased with the aesthetic appearance of their chest. Conclusion: This systematic review revealed the limited availability of research regarding postmastectomy chest reconstruction in males with breast cancer. Nevertheless, the evidence available suggests that reconstruction can restore a patient's body image and, thus, should be regularly considered and discussed with male patients. Larger studies are warranted to further shed light on this population.

A comparative analysis of males and females with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy using the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP).

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of literature comparing the postoperative outcomes of males and females with breast cancer who undergo mastectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the comorbidities and 30-day post-mastectomy complication rates among males and females. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy from 2014 to 2016 using the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. Data including patient demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day surgical and medical complications were collected. Statistical analysis included Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Student T-tests for continuous variables. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 15,167 patients were identified. There were 497 males (3.3%) and 14,670 females (96.7%). Age was significantly higher in females compared to males (63.5 vs. 57.6 years, p < 0.001). Body mass index (BMI) at time of surgery was also higher in males (30.0 vs. 29.3 kg/m2, p = 0.011). There was a higher prevalence of diabetes in males (20.1 vs. 16.5%, p = 0.032). Operative duration was significantly longer in females (114.9 vs. 95.0 min, p < 0.001). Median postoperative length of stay was also longer in females (1.2 vs. 0.8 days, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in 30-day medical or surgical complication rates between the two sexes. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that differences in age, BMI, and comorbidities between males and females do not significantly impact 30-day medical or surgical complications following total mastectomy for breast cancer. Further research is warranted to identify perioperative risk factors that influence post-mastectomy complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 (Retrospective cohort study).

Review of Speech Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients at a Nascent Cochlear Implant Program.

INTRODUCTION: The use of cochlear implantation to rehabilitate moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss has become more widespread; however, the adult utilization rate of cochlear implant candidates is still very less. The study aims to examine the percentage of adult patients in a heterogeneous group of cochlear implant recipients at a nascent cochlear implant program who demonstrate improvements in speech outcomes. METHODS: Speech outcome scores were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at three, six, and 12-month intervals using consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words and AzBio sentences in quiet. Mean speech outcome scores at each time point and binomial distribution tables with 95% CI were used to assess individual improvement in speech understanding. RESULTS: 45 patients underwent a total of 49 cochlear implantation surgeries. The mean age at surgery was 62 years. The mean preoperative CNC score in the ear to be implanted was 18%±18, while the mean postoperative CNC score at three, six, and 12 months was 35%±21, 44%±23, and 45%±25, respectively. The mean preoperative AzBio score in the ear to be implanted was 22%±26 while the mean postoperative AzBio score at three, six, and 12 months was 50%±29, 56%±27, and 63%±26, respectively. Of the implantations, 74% (32 of 43) and 69% (22 of 32) showed significant improvement at six months or one year using AzBio and CNC binomial distribution tables, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate significant improvements in speech perception following cochlear implantation for patients not benefiting from hearing aid aural rehabilitation. The study provides realistic expectations for new and emerging programs hoping to demonstrate cochlear implant utility for improving patients' speech outcomes.

National evaluation of patterns and predictors of underuse of multimodal therapy for high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas remains widely varied. Despite growing support for a multimodal approach for treatment of these rare and aggressive neoplasms, its dissemination remains underused. This national study aimed to evaluate variations in treatment patterns and uncover factors predictive of underuse of multimodal therapy in high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas. METHODS: The 2010 to 2015 National Cancer Database was used to evaluate trends in 3 common treatment patterns: surgery alone, surgery + adjuvant therapy, and neoadjuvant therapy + surgery. Demographic-, sarcoma-, hospital-, and treatment-level factors of 6,725 surgically treated patients with stage II or III intermediate- to high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas were evaluated by types of treatment modality. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors predictive of each treatment modality. RESULTS: When compared to surgery alone (34.6%) and adjuvant therapy (41.2%), use of neoadjuvant therapy + surgery for high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas remained low (25.3%). However, time trend analysis demonstrated that neoadjuvant therapy + surgery has significantly increased by 7% per year, whereas surgery alone decreased by 4% every year (P < .05 for both). Factors predictive of surgery alone were older age, nonprivate insurance, increasing travel distance, and multimorbidity (P < .05). Conversely, factors associated with neoadjuvant therapy + surgery were private insurance, higher education, and care at academic or high-volume institutions (for all, P < .05). Tumor-related factors predictive for neoadjuvant therapy + surgery included size <5 cm and higher-grade tumors (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Adoption of multimodality therapy for high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas remains low and gradual in the United States. Dissemination of multimodality therapy will require attention to access and hospital factors to maximize these therapies for high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas.

Did ethno-racial disparities in access to transcatheter aortic valve replacement change over time?

Objective: In this study we sought to evaluate whether disparate use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) among non-White patients has decreased over time, and if unequal access to TAVR is driven by unequal access to high-volume hospitals. Methods: From 2013 to 2017, we used the State Inpatient Database across 8 states (Ariz, Colo, Fla, Md, NC, NM, Nev, Wash) to identify 51,232 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent TAVR versus surgical aortic valve replacement. Hospitals were categorized as low- (<50 per year), medium- (50-100 per year), or high-volume (>100 per year) according to total valve procedures (TAVR + surgical aortic valve replacement). Multivariable logistic regression models with interactions were performed to determine the effect of race, time, and hospital volume on the utilization of TAVR. Results: Non-White patients were less likely to receive TAVR than White patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.83). However, utilization of TAVR increased over time (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.73-1.80) for the total population, with non-White patients' TAVR use growing faster than for White patients (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00-1.12), time × race interaction, P = .034. Further, an adjusted volume-stratified time trend analysis showed that utilization of TAVR at high volume hospitals increased faster for non-White patients versus White patients by 8.6% per year (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.16) whereas use at low- and medium-volume hospitals did not contribute to any decreasing utilization gap. Conclusions: This analysis shows initial low rates of TAVR utilization among non-White patients followed by accelerated use over time, relative to White patients. This narrowing gap was driven by increased TAVR utilization by non-White patients at high-volume hospitals.

ACA Medicaid expansion reduced disparities in use of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Early evaluation of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion demonstrated persistent disparities among Medicaid beneficiaries in use of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery. Longer-term effects of expansion remain unknown. This study evaluated the impact of expansion on the use of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery among Medicaid and uninsured patients. METHODS: State inpatient databases (2012-2017), the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database, and the Area Resource File from the Health Resources and Services Administration, were used to examine 8,264 non-elderly adults who underwent pancreatic surgery in nine expansion and two non-expansion states. High-volume hospitals were defined as performing 20 or more resections/year. Linear probability triple differences models measured pre- and post-Affordable Care Act utilization rates of pancreatic surgery at high-volume hospitals among Medicaid and uninsured patients versus privately insured patients in expansion versus non-expansion states. RESULTS: The Affordable Care Act's expansion was associated with increased rates of utilization of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery by Medicaid and uninsured patients (48% vs 55.4%, P = .047) relative to privately insured patients in expansion states (triple difference estimate +11.7%, P = .022). A pre-Affordable Care Act gap in use of high-volume hospitals among Medicaid and uninsured patients in expansion states versus non-expansion states (48% vs 77%, P < .0001) was reduced by 15.1% (P = .001) post Affordable Care Act. A pre Affordable Care Act gap between expansion versus non-expansion states was larger for Medicaid and uninsured patients relative to privately insured patients by 24.9% (P < .0001) and was reduced by 11.7% (P = .022) post Affordable Care Act. Rates among privately insured patients remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Medicaid expansion was associated with greater utilization of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery among Medicaid and uninsured patients. These findings are informative to non-expansion states considering expansion. Future studies should target understanding referral mechanism post-expansion.

Neurosarcoidosis Directly Involving the Cervical Vagus Nerve.

OBJECTIVES: To present a novel location in which neurosarcoidomatous inflammation is identified and its accompanying presentation. METHODS: The authors present a case of bilateral vocal fold paresis associated with non-caseating granulomatous inflammation of the cervical and intra-axial portions of the vagus nerve masquerading as a cranial nerve tumor. RESULTS: Examination revealed bilateral vocal fold paresis and asymmetric palate elevation. MRI demonstrated enhancing bilateral jugular foramen masses, and neck ultrasound demonstrated bilateral thickened appearance of the vagus nerves. Vagus nerve biopsy demonstrated non-caseating granulomas. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosarcoidosis may contribute to variable cranial neuropathies. Vocal fold paresis is usually thought to arise from mediastinal compression of the left recurrent laryngeal nerve. Rarely, though, lesions may arise in other parts of the vagus nerve. Failure of response to steroids does not rule out the diagnosis, making tissue diagnosis important in some cases.

Cochlear Implantation and Perioperative Management in Autoimmune Inner Ear Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: To assess outcomes in autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED) after cochlear implantation (CI) through systematic review and meta-analysis. Databases Reviewed: PubMed, MedLine, Embase, and CINAHL. Methods: Databases were queried for inclusion of AIED patients who underwent CI with outcomes recorded ≥3 months postoperatively. We examined demographics, pure-tone average (PTA), speech perception, preoperative imaging, intraoperative management, and postoperative complications. Results: Twenty-six articles encompassing 124 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean implantation age was 26.2 years (range 4-65 years) with average length of follow-up at 28.2 months (range 3-120 months). Meta-analysis demonstrated significant improvement in speech perception following CI. There was a statistically significant improvement in speech recognition score (SRS) (standard mean difference [SMD] = 6.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-8.0, P < 0.0001) as well as word recognition score (WRS) (SMD = 5.5, 95% CI, 4.2-6.8, P < 0.0001) after CI. Anomalous preoperative radiologic manifestations were reported by 57.7% (15/26) studies. Disease activity-related intraoperative adjustment was noted in 57.7% (15/26) studies; common consequences were cochlear drill-out (53.3%), difficult round window insertion (26.7%), and scala vestibuli insertion (26.7%). Frequent postoperative complications noted in 26.9% (7/26) studies included systemic AIED flares (71.4%) and wound healing delay (42.9%). Conclusion: Findings of this systematic review of AIED cochlear implant literature demonstrate a lack of consistent reporting standards for PTA and speech perception as well as a lack of long-term follow-up. Despite these findings, meta-analysis suggests that CI is a viable treatment for improving speech perception in AIED patients.

Unintended Consequences of Health Care Reform: Impact of Changes in Payor Mix on Patient Safety Indicators.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion on patient safety metrics at the hospital level by expansion status, across varying levels of safety-net burden, and over time. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Medicaid expansion has raised concerns over the influx of additional medically and socially complex populations on hospital systems. Whether increases in Medicaid and uninsured payor mix impact hospital performance metrics remains largely unknown. We sought to evaluate the effects of expansion on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-endorsed Patient Safety Indicators (PSI-90). METHODS: Three hundred fifty-eight hospitals were identified using State Inpatient Databases (2012-2015) from 3 expansions (KY, MD, NJ) and 2 nonexpansion (FL, NC) states. PSI-90 scores were calculated using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality modules. Hospital Medicaid and uninsured patients were categorized into safety-net burden (SNB) quartiles. Hospital-level, multivariate linear regression was performed to measure the effects of expansion and change in SNB on PSI-90. RESULTS: PSI-90 decreased (safety improved) over time across all hospitals (-5.2%), with comparable reductions in expansion versus nonexpansion states (-5.9% vs -4.7%, respectively; P = 0.441) and across high SNB hospitals within expansion versus nonexpansion states (-3.9% vs -5.2%, P = 0.639). Pre-ACA SNB quartile did not predict changes in PSI-90 post-ACA. However, when hospitals increased their SNB by 5%, they incurred significantly more safety events in expansion relative to nonexpansion states (+1.87% vs -14.0%, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Despite overall improvement in patient safety, increased SNB was associated with increased safety events in expansion states. Accordingly, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services measures may unintentionally penalize hospitals with increased SNB following Medicaid expansion.