Effect of footplate neuromuscular electrical stimulation on functional and quality-of-life parameters in patients with peripheral artery disease: pilot, and subsequent randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Supervised exercise programmes for intermittent claudication have poor access and limited compliance. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be an effective alternative. A proof-of-concept study and RCT were conducted. METHODS: In study 1, eligible patients underwent baseline assessment; treadmill testing for initial (ICD) and maximum (MCD) claudication distance; EuroQoL Five Dimensions five-level instrument (EQ-5D-5L™) and Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) assessment; and measurement of ultrasound haemodynamics of the superficial femoral artery. After familiarization with the NMES device, participants underwent a 30-min session of stimulation with concomitant recording of haemodynamic measures at 15 min, and after device cessation. Measurements were repeated after 6 weeks of daily use of NMES. In study 2, consecutive patients underwent baseline assessment before online randomization to a supervised exercise programme only, or adjunctive NMES treatment for 6 weeks, followed by repeat measurements. RESULTS: Study 1 (20 patients) showed a significant improvement in MCD (46 per cent; P < 0·001) and ICD (71 per cent; P < 0·001). The RCT (42 patients) showed a significant adjunctive benefit of NMES in ICD (46 per cent; P = 0·014). Improvements were seen in the ICQ (9 points; P = 0·009) and EQ-5D-5L™ (P = 0·007) in study 1, and there was a significant adjunctive benefit of NMES on the ICQ score in patients who did supervised exercise (11·2 points; P = 0·031). Blood volume flow and time-adjusted mean velocity increased significantly with the device on (P < 0·050). Overall, NMES compliance exceeded 95 per cent. CONCLUSION: Footplate NMES significantly improved walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication when used independently and also as an adjunct to supervised exercise. Registration number: trial 1, NCT02436200; trial 2, NCT02429310 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

ANTECEDENTES: Los programas de ejercicio supervisado (supervised exercise programmes, SEP) para la claudicación intermitente (intermittent claudication, IC) tienen un acceso y un cumplimiento deficientes. La estimulación eléctrica neuromuscular (neuromuscular electrical stimulation, NMES) puede ser una alternativa clínicamente efectiva. Se realizó un estudio de prueba de concepto y un ensayo controlado aleatorizado. MÉTODOS: Estudio 1: Veinte pacientes elegibles se sometieron a una evaluación inicial que incluía una prueba en la cinta de correr para la distancia inicial de claudicación (initial claudication distance, ICD) y la distancia máxima de claudicación (maximum claudication distance, MCD), EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D), valoración mediante el cuestionario de claudicación intermitente (intermittent claudication questionnaire, ICQ), y hemodinámica por ecografía de la arteria femoral superficial. Después de familiarizarse con el dispositivo NMES, los participantes se sometieron a una sesión de estimulación de 30 minutos con el registro concomitante de medidas hemodinámicas a los 15 minutos y después del cese del dispositivo. Se realizaron mediciones repetidas después de 6 semanas de uso diario de NMES. Estudio 2: Se reclutaron 42 pacientes que tras una evaluación inicial y posterior aleatorización al azar en línea, se asignaron al Grupo A, utilizando SEP solamente; o al el Grupo B, con tratamiento NMES complementario durante 6 semanas seguido de medidas repetidas. RESULTADOS: El estudio 1 mostró una mejoría significativa de la MCD (46%, P < 0,0001) y de la ICD (71%, P < 0.004). El ensayo clínico mostró un beneficio coadyuvante significativo de NMES en la ICD (46%, P = 0,014). Se observaron mejorías en la puntuación del ICQ (9 puntos, P < 0,01) y del EQ-5D (P < 0,05) en el estudio 1, con un beneficio coadyuvante significativo de NMES en la puntuación del ICQ (11 puntos, P < 0,05). El flujo de volumen de sangre (CC/min) y TAMV (cm/s) aumentaron significativamente con el dispositivo en funcionamiento (P < 0,05). El cumplimiento global de la NMES superó el 95%. CONCLUSIÓN: La plataforma de NMES para el pie mejora significativamente las distancias de caminar en la claudicación intermitente cuando se usa de forma independiente y también proporciona un beneficio complementario al ejercicio supervisado en la distancia caminada sin dolor. La mejora del flujo sanguíneo puede ser un mecanismo para explicar estos resultados.

Randomised Controlled Trial: Potential Benefit of a Footplate Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Device in Patients with Chronic Venous Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic venous disease (CVD) is common, affecting a quarter of the population. Current conservative methods of treatment aim to prevent progression of disease by reducing ambulatory venous pressure. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) refers to the use of electrical impulses to elicit muscle contraction. This pilot randomised controlled trial investigates the effect of a footplate NMES device (REVITIVE) on venous flow parameters, limb oedema, and quality of life outcome measures in patients with CVD. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with Clinical Etiological Anatomical and Pathophysiological (CEAP) clinical class C2-C4 venous disease were randomised to receive a sham or test device. The recommended duration of use was for 30 minutes daily for 6 weeks. Venous flow parameters (duplex ultrasound), limb volume (optoelectric volumeter), and quality of life outcome measures were measured at baseline and after 6 weeks. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 62 years, body mass index 28.6, with a 15:7 female preponderance. There was a significant difference in the percentage change in femoral vein flow parameters (from baseline) between the test and sham group while using the device (Week 0 time-averaged mean velocity 102.4% vs. -9.1%, p < .0001; volume flow 107.9% vs. -3.7%, p < .0001; peak velocity 377.7% vs. -6.7%, p < .0001). Limb volume was observed to increase significantly in the sham group (2.0% at Week 0 and 1.2% at Week 6; p < .01). This was prevented in the test group (+0.8% at Week 0 and 1.0% at Week 6; p = .06). There was a significant difference in the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire between the two groups over the 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrated a significant difference in venous flow parameters and prevention of orthostatic limb oedema with NMES. There was a positive effect on quality of life. Larger studies are required to determine the clinical significance of this in patients with venous disease.

Non-Invasive Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is common and symptoms can be debilitating and lethal. Risk management, exercise, radiological and surgical intervention are all valuable therapies, but morbidity and mortality rates from this disease are increasing. Circulatory enhancement can be achieved using simple medical electronic devices, with claims of minimal adverse side effects. The evidence for these is variable, prompting a review of the available literature. METHODS: Embase and Medline were interrogated for full text articles in humans and written in English. Any external medical devices used in the management of peripheral arterial disease were included if they had objective outcome data. RESULTS: Thirty-one papers met inclusion criteria, but protocols were heterogenous. The medical devices reported were intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), electronic nerve (NMES) or muscle stimulators (EMS), and galvanic electrical dressings. In patients with intermittent claudication, IPC devices increase popliteal artery velocity (49-70 %) and flow (49-84 %). Gastrocnemius EMS increased superficial femoral artery flow by 140 %. Over 4.5-6 months IPC increased intermittent claudication distance (ICD) (97-150 %) and absolute walking distance (AWD) (84-112 %), with an associated increase in quality of life. NMES of the calf increased ICD and AWD by 82 % and 61-150 % at 4 weeks, and 26 % and 34 % at 8 weeks. In patients with critical limb ischaemia IPC reduced rest pain in 40-100 % and was associated with ulcer healing rates of 26 %. IPC had an early limb salvage rate of 58-83 % at 1-3 months, and 58-94 % at 1.5-3.5 years. No studies have reported the use of EMS or NMES in the management of CLI. CONCLUSION: There is evidence to support the use of IPC in the management of claudication and CLI. There is a building body of literature to support the use of electrical stimulators in PAD, but this is low level to date. Devices may be of special benefit to those with limited exercise capacity, and in non-reconstructable critical limb ischaemia. Galvanic stimulation is not recommended.

A Review of the Evidence to Support Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in the Prevention and Management of Venous Disease.

INTRODUCTION: The prevention and management of venous disease is a therapeutic challenge. Movement of blood through the venous system is augmented by the action of muscles on the deep veins, and can be achieved through the application of electrical current. The efficacy of currently available clinical devices for this purpose is unknown, and is investigated here. METHODS: A literature search of the EMBASE and Medline databases was performed, and studies were included if they were full text articles, written in english, pertaining to venous disease and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). RESULTS: NMES devices increase venous haemodynamic parameters such as peak velocity and volume flow. Studies report them to be non-inferior to intermittent pneumatic compression. They are effective in the prevention of venous thromboembolism, though inferior to low molecular weight heparin. NMES can reduce symptoms of chronic venous disease. DISCUSSION: NMES is an important tool in the prevention and management of venous disease, and avoids the significant risks associated with heparin administration. Data explored here is heterogenous in device, protocol, and reported end-points, therefore should be interpreted with care. Long term effects of treatment with NMES have not been explored.