Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(10): e2337602, 2023 10 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37824141

RESUMEN

Importance: Live vaccines (measles-mumps-rubella [MMR] and varicella-zoster virus [VZV]) have not been recommended after solid organ transplant due to concern for inciting vaccine strain infection in an immunocompromised host. However, the rates of measles, mumps, and varicella are rising nationally and internationally, leaving susceptible immunocompromised children at risk for life-threating conditions. Objective: To determine the safety and immunogenicity of live vaccines in pediatric liver and kidney transplant recipients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included select pediatric liver and kidney transplant recipients who had not completed their primary MMR and VZV vaccine series and/or who displayed nonprotective serum antibody levels at enrollment between January 1, 2002, and February 28, 2023. Eligibility for live vaccine was determined by individual US pediatric solid organ transplant center protocols. Exposures: Exposure was defined as receipt of a posttransplant live vaccine. Transplant recipients received 1 to 3 doses of MMR vaccine and/or 1 to 3 doses of VZV vaccine. Main Outcome and Measure: Safety data were collected following each vaccination, and antibody levels were obtained at 0 to 3 months and 1 year following vaccination. Comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U test, and factors associated with development of postvaccination protective antibodies were explored using univariate analysis. Results: The cohort included 281 children (270 [96%] liver, 9 [3%] kidney, 2 [1%] liver-kidney recipients) from 18 centers. The median time from transplant to enrollment was 6.3 years (IQR, 3.4-11.1 years). The median age at first posttransplant vaccine was 8.9 years (IQR, 4.7-13.8 years). A total of 202 of 275 (73%) children were receiving low-level monotherapy immunosuppression at the time of vaccination. The majority of children developed protective antibodies following vaccination (107 of 149 [72%] varicella, 130 of 152 [86%] measles, 100 of 120 [83%] mumps, and 124 of 125 [99%] rubella). One year post vaccination, the majority of children who initially mounted protective antibodies maintained this protection (34 of 44 [77%] varicella, 45 of 49 [92%] measles, 35 of 42 [83%] mumps, 51 of 54 [94%] rubella). Five children developed clinical varicella, all of which resolved within 1 week. There were no cases of measles or rubella and no episodes of graft rejection within 1 month of vaccination. There was no association between antibody response and immunosuppression level at the time of vaccination. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that live vaccinations may be safe and immunogenic after solid organ transplant in select pediatric recipients and can offer protection against circulating measles, mumps, and varicella.


Asunto(s)
Varicela , Sarampión , Paperas , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Vacunas Virales , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Adolescente , Varicela/prevención & control , Vacuna contra la Varicela/efectos adversos , Vacunas Combinadas , Receptores de Trasplantes , Estudios de Cohortes , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacunas Atenuadas/efectos adversos
2.
J Pediatr Nurs ; 73: e10-e18, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37442685

RESUMEN

PROBLEM: Overnight vital signs are typically taken every four hours on pediatric acute care units, despite limited evidence supporting the efficacy of this practice. Vital signs are often ordered and collected without considering the patient's clinical status or potential impact that they may have on sleep. We sought to understand the impact that overnight vital sign monitoring has on sleep duration and disruptions among hospitalized children in an acute care setting. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We conducted a scoping review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Studies were included if they addressed the relationship between vital signs monitoring and sleep among children hospitalized in an acute care unit. SAMPLE: Eleven studies from 2012 to 2022 were included in the final review. RESULTS: Vital signs monitoring is the most common sleep disruptor among hospitalized children in acute care units and early evidence suggests that minimizing overnight vital signs may be a safe intervention for clinically stable children. Methods for measuring sleep duration and disruptions are heterogenous and validated tools are not often used. Finally, nurses report comfort with forgoing overnight vital signs when their patient's clinical status is stable. CONCLUSION: Despite a lack of evidence regarding the efficacy of every 4 h vital signs, overnight vital signs monitoring is consistently the greatest disruptor to sleep for hospitalized children. IMPLICATIONS: Nurses should play a central role in guiding vital signs monitoring that maintains safety and improves sleep in hospitalized children.


Asunto(s)
Niño Hospitalizado , Duración del Sueño , Niño , Humanos , Sueño , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Signos Vitales
3.
J Autism Dev Disord ; 51(3): 994-1006, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33591436

RESUMEN

Most children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), in resource-limited settings (RLS), are diagnosed after the age of four. Our work confirmed and extended results of Pierce that eye tracking could discriminate between typically developing (TD) children and those with ASD. We demonstrated the initial 15 s was at least as discriminating as the entire video. We evaluated the GP-MCHAT-R, which combines the first 15 s of manually-coded gaze preference (GP) video with M-CHAT-R results on 73 TD children and 28 children with ASD, 36-99 months of age. The GP-MCHAT-R (AUC = 0.89 (95%CI: 0.82-0.95)), performed significantly better than the MCHAT-R (AUC = 0.78 (95%CI: 0.71-0.85)) and gaze preference (AUC = 0.76 (95%CI: 0.64-0.88)) alone. This tool may enable early screening for ASD in RLS.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista/diagnóstico , Lista de Verificación/métodos , Tecnología de Seguimiento Ocular , Fijación Ocular/fisiología , Recursos en Salud , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/epidemiología , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/fisiopatología , Lista de Verificación/normas , Niño , Preescolar , Tecnología de Seguimiento Ocular/normas , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Perú/epidemiología
4.
J Neurosci Res ; 97(2): 137-148, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30315659

RESUMEN

Neurocysticercosis (NCC) is a helminth infection affecting the central nervous system caused by the larval stage (cysticercus) of Taenia solium. Since vascular alteration and blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption contribute to NCC pathology, it is postulated that angiogenesis could contribute to the pathology of this disease. This study used a rat model for NCC and evaluated the expression of two angiogenic factors called vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF2). Also, two markers for BBB disruption, the endothelial barrier antigen and immunoglobulin G, were evaluated using immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence techniques. Brain vasculature changes, BBB disruption, and overexpression of angiogenesis markers surrounding viable cysts were observed. Both VEGF-A and FGF2 were overexpressed in the tissue surrounding the cysticerci, and VEGF-A was overexpressed in astrocytes. Vessels showed decreased immunoreactivity to endothelial barrier antigen marker and an extensive staining for IgG was found in the tissues surrounding the cysts. Additionally, an endothelial cell tube formation assay using human umbilical vein endothelial cells showed that excretory and secretory antigens of T. solium cysticerci induce the formation of these tubes. This in vitro model supports the hypothesis that angiogenesis in NCC might be caused by the parasite itself, as opposed to the host inflammatory responses alone. In conclusion, brain vasculature changes, BBB disruption, and overexpression of angiogenesis markers surrounding viable cysts were observed. This study also demonstrates that cysticerci excretory-secretory processes alone can stimulate angiogenesis.


Asunto(s)
Barrera Hematoencefálica/fisiopatología , Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Neovascularización Patológica/metabolismo , Neurocisticercosis/fisiopatología , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo , Animales , Vasos Sanguíneos/parasitología , Vasos Sanguíneos/patología , Barrera Hematoencefálica/parasitología , Barrera Hematoencefálica/patología , Encéfalo/parasitología , Células Endoteliales/metabolismo , Células Endoteliales/parasitología , Células Endoteliales/patología , Células Endoteliales de la Vena Umbilical Humana , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/metabolismo , Neovascularización Patológica/parasitología , Neurocisticercosis/parasitología , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Taenia solium
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...