Efficacy of a motilin receptor agonist (ABT-229) for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: ABT-229 is a potent motilin agonist without significant antibiotic activity. It has been shown to improve gastric emptying in humans and to increase lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in cats. AIM: To assess the efficacy of four different doses of ABT-229 (1.25 mg, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg b.d.) compared to placebo in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and to determine its safety in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: In a double-blind, multicentre study, 324 patients with heartburn were randomized to receive four different doses of ABT-229 or placebo for 8 weeks. The efficacy was evaluated by Patient Symptom Questionnaire, daily diary, endoscopy and global evaluation of efficacy. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant improvement scores for any of the ABT-229 treatment groups vs. the placebo group in any of the efficacy parameters. Reflux symptom scores were significantly worse after treatment in the dyspeptic group. ABT-229 appeared to be well tolerated and safe in total daily doses up to 20 mg. CONCLUSION: ABT-229 appears to have limited, if any, clinical utility in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Failure of a motilin receptor agonist (ABT-229) to relieve the symptoms of functional dyspepsia in patients with and without delayed gastric emptying: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Motilin-receptor agonists are prokinetics; whether they relieve the symptoms of functional dyspepsia is unknown. We aimed to test the efficacy of the motilin agonist ABT-229 in functional dyspepsia patients with and without delayed gastric emptying. METHODS: Patients were randomized with postprandial symptoms and documented functional dyspepsia by endoscopy (n=589 in intention-to-treat analysis). Patients were assigned to either the delayed or normal gastric emptying strata, based on a validated 13C octanoic acid breath test. Patients were then further randomized within each strata, to receive one of four doses of ABT-229 (1.25, 2. 5, 5 or 10 mg b.d. before breakfast and dinner) or placebo for 4 weeks, following a 2-week baseline. The primary outcome was the assessment of change in symptom severity over the 2 weeks from baseline to final visit, based on a self-report questionnaire measuring severity on visual analogue scales. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics across the treatment arms were very similar. No significant differences in the upper abdominal discomfort severity score (maximum 800 mm) were observed for any active treatment arm vs. placebo (mean change from baseline -139, -141, -145, -160 and -134 mm for placebo, 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg, respectively, at 4 weeks by intention-to-treat). More patients on placebo reported a good or excellent global response than patients on 1.25 or 5 mg of active therapy (both P < 0.05). The results were very similar in those with and without delayed gastric emptying. Helicobacter pylori status did not predict response. Excluding patients with any baseline heartburn (total remaining n=240), ABT-229 10 mg was inferior to placebo in relief of upper abdominal discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: ABT-229 was of no value for relief of symptoms in functional dyspepsia, compared with placebo.

[Ranitidine in stomach ulcer. Controlled clinical trial of a comparison of administration after the evening meal or before bedtime]. / Ranitidin beim Ulcus ventriculi. Kontrollierte klinische Prüfung zum Vergleich der Einnahme nach dem Abendessen oder vor dem Schlafengehen.

In a randomized, double-blind comparative trial, 44 patients with gastric ulcer received one dose of ranitidine 300 mg following the evening meal (between 17.30 and 20.00 hours), and a placebo tablet just before retiring for the night (21.30 to 23.00 hours) (R-P group). In the comparative group, 43 patients received the same substances in the reverse order (P-R group). After four weeks' treatment, the endoscopic follow-up examinations revealed a 76% healing rate in the R-P group and a 63% healing rate in the P-R group. After six weeks, cumulative healing rates of 98% and 81%, respectively (p less than 0.05) were obtained, showing a better healing effect after early evening ingestion of ranitidine. The number of symptoms recorded at the start of treatment had, after four weeks of treatment, decreased considerably more following early-evening ingestion of ranitidine than after late-evening ingestion (p = 0.05). The results of this trial suggest that, in the treatment of gastric ulcers, the early-evening administration of ranitidine 300 mg is more effective than other modes of ingestion.