RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between timing of indwelling catheter removal and urinary retention after cesarean. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight hospitals in suburban, rural, and urban Colorado and Montana. PARTICIPANTS: Women who gave birth by cesarean from January 1, 2021, to April 30, 2022 (N = 3,496). METHODS: We categorized participants who gave birth between January 1, 2021, and June 29, 2021, (before implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery initiative) into Group A and participants who gave birth between July 1, 2021, and April 30, 2022, (after implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery initiative) into Group B. We used descriptive statistics to report the proportion of participants in both groups who experienced urinary retention after birth. We performed chi-square tests to determine the association between the time of catheter removal and incidence of urinary retention. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine the association between length of stay and urinary retention. RESULTS: Urinary retention rates were 5.8% in Group A and 12.6% in Group B (p < .001). In both groups, participants who received epidural anesthesia experienced significantly more urinary retention than those who received spinal anesthesia (p < .001). Participants who received epidural anesthesia and experienced urinary retention pushed 16.9% longer than those without urinary retention (p < .001). The proportion of participants who experienced urinary retention after catheter removal was 19.4% at 7 hours, 4.6% at 16 hours, and 9.9% at 12 hours after birth. Length of stay was determined to be inconclusive. CONCLUSION: We determined that the optimal time of catheter removal to minimize the rate of urinary retention was 12 to 16 hours after cesarean among women who received morphine sulfate as the spinal anesthesia.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: After a motorcycle crash (MCC), emergency medical services (EMS) responders must balance trauma center proximity with clinical needs of patients, which is especially challenging in rural states. The study purpose was to determine if MCC patients treated at lower-level trauma centers (LLTC) experienced higher mortality when compared to patients transported directly to the highest level of trauma care available in the state at Level II trauma centers. PROCEDURES: A retrospective study was conducted on MCC patients transported by EMS to Montana hospitals and met registry inclusion criteria in 2020-2021. The first study group included patients initially transported to state-designated trauma centers (equivalent to Level III-V) or non-designated hospitals (LLTC), and the second group included patients transported directly to American College of Surgeon verified Level II trauma centers (L2TC). Secondary transfer was defined as initial transport to a LLTC and subsequent transfer to a L2TC. Primary study outcome was mortality at the L2TC. Chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for analysis. FINDINGS: In the study period, 337 MCC patients were transported by EMS; 186 (55%) patients were transported to a LLTC while 151 patients (45%) were transported to a L2TC. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality (12% vs 8%, p = 0.30) when comparing secondary transfer patients to patients transported directly to a L2TC. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of patients initially evaluated at a LLTC required transfer to a higher-level of care. Secondary transfer was not associated with increased mortality.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Centros Traumatológicos , Accidentes de Tránsito , Estudios Retrospectivos , Motocicletas , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Triaje , Puntaje de Gravedad del TraumatismoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project was to implement a remote fetal surveillance unit with increased vigilance and timelier responses to electronic fetal monitor tracings to improve neonatal outcomes and increase safety. METHODS: A pilot project, OB HUB, facilitated implementation of a centralized remote fetal surveillance unit including artificial intelligence software and nurse experts dedicated to fetal monitoring interpretation. A telemetry room was established. Notification parameters were created to promote consistent communication between OB HUB nurses and bedside nurses. Outcomes for term neonates included body cooling, arterial cord pH less than 7.0, Apgar scores less than 7 at 5 minutes, emergency cesarean births, and cesarean births. Surveys were used to evaluate team perceptions of fetal safety. RESULTS: There were 2,407 births 6 months pre OB HUB implementation and 2,582 births during the 6-month trial, for a total sample of 4,989 births included in the analysis. Six births (0.25%) resulted in cooling prior to implementation and 2 (0.08%) cooling events occurred during the trial; these differences were not significant (p = .10). There were no significant differences between groups for neonatal outcomes. Average level of safety perceived by nurses and providers remained relatively unchanged when comparing pre- and postimplementation survey results; however, of those responding, 78.8% of nurses indicated the OB HUB improved safety. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: There were few adverse events in either group, thus it was a challenge to demonstrate statistically significant improvement in neonatal outcomes even with a sample of nearly 5,000 births. A larger sample is needed to support clinical utility. The OB HUB was perceived favorably by most of the L&D nurses.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Cardiotocografía , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Cardiotocografía/métodos , Proyectos Piloto , Cesárea , Monitoreo FetalRESUMEN
DESIGN: In a setting with a wider than usual variety of available labor pain relief methods, a prospective, descriptive study was conducted of labor pain relief methods desired by low-risk women prenatally, during labor, and at delivery. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Of all women registering for care between 2017 and 2020, a total of 2562 women were screened for low-risk status and then offered study participation, if eligible. Of 1185 eligible women, 512 remained at low risk until admission in labor and completed the study. Pain relief methods chosen were compared with the type of labor, type of delivery, and between delivery sites. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Hydrotherapy and a "none/unmedicated" labor were favored by a majority of subjects, regardless of ultimate method used. Multiple labor pain relief methods were used by 54.5% of subjects. Epidural analgesia most often occurred with augmented labor. Hydrotherapy was used more by those with spontaneous labors, water birth deliveries, and birth center births. Effectiveness of all pain relief measures was rated above average. Differences between planned hospital and planned birth center births were clear on most variables. Results can be used by childbirth educators, health professionals, and administrators to respect and improve the individualization of care and satisfaction of laboring women.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural , Analgesia Obstétrica , Dolor de Parto , Trabajo de Parto , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de Parto/terapia , Embarazo , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare levels of postoperative oxycodone use and incisional pain between two randomized groups-an intervention and a control. DESIGN: Mixed-methods design; quantitative data achieved via a randomized controlled trial, with qualitative data collected on binder use. The primary variable was oxycodone (in milligrams) required during the first 48 hours after birth, and the secondary variable was incisional pain levels measured on Postoperative Days 1 and 2. SETTING: Acute-care community hospital in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and an acute care urban hospital in Denver, Colorado. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 220 individuals in the postpartum period after having cesarean birth. INTERVENTIONS/MEASUREMENTS: Participants were randomized to the intervention group (binder) or the control group (no binder). Data were collected on opioid usage for the first 48 hours. Participants in both groups were asked to rate their incisional pain on Postoperative Day 1 (24 hours after birth) and Postoperative Day 2 (48 hours after birth). Participants in the binder group were also asked to provide feedback on their experience wearing the binder. RESULTS: A total of 196 participants completed the study. The overall amount of oxycodone taken by individuals in the binder group was lower than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = .10). Pain scores in the binder group were significantly lower on Day 2 compared with the control group (p = .002). The majority of individuals in the binder group provided positive feedback about their experience wearing the binder. CONCLUSION: Individuals routinely receive medications to assist with pain management postoperatively. Because of growing concerns related to the nation's opioid addiction crisis, there is interest in using multimodal treatments to achieve adequate pain control for individuals postoperatively. Abdominal binders are a low-cost intervention to assist with pain management and, given the results of this study, seem like a reasonable option to consider.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Manejo del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , EmbarazoRESUMEN
Mental, emotional, and behavioral (MEB) health problems are prevalent globally. Despite effective programs that can prevent MEB problems and promote mental health, there has not been widespread adoption. UPSTREAM! Together was a planning project in three Colorado communities. Communities partnered with academic and policy entities to 1) translate evidence about MEB problem prevention into locally-relevant messages and materials and 2) develop long-term plans for broad implementation of interventions to prevent high-priority MEB problems. Community members recognized the need to talk about MEB problems to prevent them. The UPSTREAM! communities localized messages designed to start conversations and sustain attention on preventing MEB problems. The communities understood that prevention takes sustained community attention and advocacy, knowing that important outcomes may be years away. Long-term implementation plans aimed to strengthen families and enhance social connections among youth. Despite community readiness and capacity to implement evidence-based programs, there were few funding opportunities, delaying program implementation and revealing gaps between funding policies and community readiness. This community-engaged experience suggests an achievable approach, acceptable to communities, and worthy of further development and testing. Policies that cultivate and support local expertise may help to increase wider community adoption of evidence-based programs that promote mental health among youth.
Asunto(s)
Emociones , Salud Mental , Adolescente , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Poisoning is the leading cause of injury death in pediatric patients. Hospital and provider readiness, including pharmacy stocking, depends on reliable surveillance data describing local patterns of age-specific clinically significant exposures and the therapeutic modalities employed in their treatment. We aimed to characterize trends in clinically significant toxic exposures and their management. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients 18 years or younger in the American College of Medical Toxicology's Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Registry, a self-reporting database completed by bedside consulting medical toxicologists. We reviewed cases from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2015. In 2015, ToxIC included 101 health care facilities. Data collected included demographics, geographic region, encounter and exposure details, survival, and therapeutic modalities employed, including antidotes, antivenoms, gastric decontamination, enhanced elimination, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2015, 11,616 consults were recorded in ToxIC. Pediatric consultations increased from 934 (23.7%) in 2010 to 2425 (29.9%) in 2015 (P < 0.001). Exposures were most commonly reported in females (57.8%) and adolescents (59.4%). Intentional ingestions (55.5%) comprised the majority of cases. The most frequent agents of exposure were analgesics (21.0%). There were 38 deaths reported (0.9%). The antidote used most commonly was N-acetylcysteine (11.0%). Geographic variation was demonstrated in prevalence of envenomations and heavy metal exposures, their respective treatments, and overall use of decontamination. CONCLUSIONS: Toxicology consultations for pediatric exposures increased from 2010 to 2015. Understanding which pediatric exposures require toxicologist management, the therapies most frequently employed, and geographical patterns is paramount to facility-level planning, pharmacy stocking, and provider education.
Asunto(s)
Antídotos , Intoxicación , Adolescente , Niño , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Intoxicación/epidemiología , Intoxicación/terapia , Derivación y Consulta , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High school athletes with lower extremity sports injuries (LESIs) frequently present to the emergency department in the United States. Previous epidemiological studies have presented rates and mechanisms of LESIs in these athletes. No studies, however, have looked at LESIs in gender-comparable sports in an attempt to evaluate what differences exist between LESIs in boys and girls. PURPOSE: To describe the epidemiology of LESIs among US high school athletes using a large national database of athletes in sports that could be considered gender comparable, given the rules of play and protective equipment. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: Descriptive data from 2005 to 2016 were collected using the internet-based High School Reporting Information Online (High School RIO), a national high school sports injury surveillance system, for athletes participating in 8 gender-comparable sports (soccer, volleyball, basketball, baseball/softball, swimming and diving, track and field, cross-country, and tennis). Rates and patterns of injury were evaluated, with injury rates calculated as ratio of injuries per 10,000 athlete-exposures. Rate ratios (RRs) were calculated to compare the LESI rates in girls and boys. RESULTS: In both genders, LESI rates (per 10,000 athlete-exposures) were highest in soccer (girls, 15.87; boys, 11.68) followed by basketball (girls, 11.51; boys, 9.35), and were lowest in swimming and diving (girls, 0.70; boys, 0.39). Although injury rates were significantly higher in girls compared with boys in all sports, only in tennis was the RR greater than 2 (RR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.17-3.54). Girls had a greater proportion of severe LESIs and injuries that received radiographic evaluation, such as magnetic resonance imaging, compared with boys for all sports except volleyball. Consistency in the mechanism of injury was demonstrated between genders within each sport. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that LESIs are common among high school athletes and disproportionately affect girls more than boys, especially when looking at severe injuries and resource utilization. Further studies are needed to elucidate the cause of these findings. We hope that the awareness of gender-based differences in LESIs will lead to improvements in targeted efforts to decrease injury rates and injury severity.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains account for a large proportion of injuries presenting to both United States (US) emergency departments (EDs) as well as high school (HS) and collegiate school athletic training settings. The epidemiologic differences across these settings by both sport and diagnosis have not been well differentiated. Ankle injury data from 3 national surveillance datasets. Athletic training setting data from the National High School Sports-Related Injury Surveillance System and the National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance Program was from academic years 2009/10 through 2013/14 and the US Consumer Product Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (ED setting) data was from calendar years 2009 through 2013. Data was analyzed for patients 14-22 years old participating in 12 sports (male football, baseball, basketball, lacrosse, soccer, and wrestling, and female softball, basketball, lacrosse, soccer, volleyball, and field hockey). We calculated sport-specific injury rates, proportions, and rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: During the study period, the surveillance systems captured 20,261 ankle injuries presenting to EDs plus 5546 HS and 2725 collegiate injuries presenting to school athletic training settings. Rates were higher in collegiate compared to HS athletes presenting in the athletic training setting. Football accounted for the largest proportion of ankle injuries presenting to HS (31.2%) and college (41.0%) athletic training settings; male basketball accounted for the largest proportion presenting to EDs among both HS (41.0%) and college (65.8%) aged patients. Sprains/strains accounted for over 80% of injuries in all three settings. Fractures accounted for a larger proportion of ankle injuries presenting to EDs (9.5%) compared to HS (3.8%) and college (0.8%) athletic training settings. There was no change in injury rates during the study period across the three settings. CONCLUSIONS: Injury rates and patterns varied by sport and presentation setting, with athletic trainers evaluating more ankle injuries overall in the collegiate setting compared to the high school setting. Ankle injuries presenting to EDs were more commonly fractures, suggesting that more severe injuries present to this setting. Understanding the epidemiology of such patterns will help readers interpret differences in publications reporting data from varied clinical settings.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the risk of missed clinician diagnosis of pediatric sepsis requiring care in the intensive care unit (ICU) was greater in community vs tertiary pediatric emergency care settings with sepsis pathways. STUDY DESIGN: An observational cohort study in a tertiary pediatric emergency department (ED) staffed by pediatric emergency physicians and 4 affiliated community pediatric ED/urgent care sites staffed by general pediatricians. Use of an institutional sepsis order set or pathway was considered clinician diagnosis of sepsis. Risk of missed diagnosis was compared for 2 outcomes: suspected infection plus ICU admission (sepsis-ICU) and suspected infection plus vasoactive agent/positive-pressure ventilation (sepsis-VV). RESULTS: From January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015, there were 141 552 tertiary and 139 332 community emergency visits. Clinicians diagnosed sepsis in 1136 visits; median age was 5.7 (2.4, 12.0) years. In the tertiary ED, there were 306 sepsis-ICU visits (0.2%) and 112 sepsis-VV visits (0.08%). In community sites, there were 46 sepsis-ICU visits (0.03%) and 20 sepsis-VV visits (0.01%). The risk of missed diagnosis in community vs tertiary sites was significantly greater for sepsis-ICU (relative risk 4.30, CI 2.15-8.60) and sepsis-VV (relative risk 14.0, CI 2.91-67.24). Sensitivity for sepsis-ICU was 94.4% (91.3%-96.5%) at the tertiary site and 76.1% (62.1%-86.1%) at community sites. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of missed diagnosis of sepsis-ICU was greater in community vs tertiary emergency care settings despite shared pathways and education, but with differences in resources, providers, and sepsis incidence. More research is needed to optimize diagnostic approaches in all settings.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Centros Comunitarios de Salud , Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Prehospital intravenous (IV) access in children may be difficult and time-consuming. Emergency Medical Service (EMS) protocols often dictate IV placement; however, some IV catheters may not be needed. The scene and transport time associated with attempting IV access in children is unknown. The objective of this study is to examine differences in scene and transport times associated with prehospital IV catheter attempt and utilization patterns of these catheters during pediatric prehospital encounters. METHODS: Three non-blinded investigators abstracted EMS and hospital records of children 0-18 years of age transported by EMS to a pediatric emergency department (ED). We compared patients in which prehospital IV access was attempted to those with no documented attempt. Our primary outcome was scene time. Secondary outcomes include utilization of the IV catheter in the prehospital and ED settings and a determination of whether the catheter was indicated based on a priori established criteria (prehospital IV medication administration, hypotension, GCS < 13, and ICU admission). RESULTS: We reviewed 1,138 records, 545 meeting inclusion criteria. IV catheter placement was attempted in 27% (n = 149) with success in 77% (n = 111). There was no difference in the presence of hypotension or median GCS between groups. Mean scene time (12.5 vs. 11.8 minutes) and transport time (16.9 vs. 14.6 minutes) were similar. Prehospital IV medications were given in 38.7% (43/111). One patient received a prehospital IV medication with no alternative route of administration. Among patients with a prehospital IV attempt, 31% (46/149) received IV medications in the ED and 23% (34/396) received IV fluids in the ED. Mean time to use of the IV in the ED was 70 minutes after arrival. Patients with prehospital IV attempt were more likely to receive IV medication within 30 minutes of ED arrival (39.1% vs. 19.0%, p = 0.04). Overall, 34.2% of IV attempts were indicated. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital IV catheter placement in children is not associated with an increase in scene or transport time. Prehospital IV catheters were used in approximately one-third of patients. Further study is needed to determine which children may benefit most from IV access in the prehospital setting.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Transporte de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Intubation in critically ill pediatric patients is associated with approximately 20% rate of adverse events, but rates in the high-risk condition of sepsis are unknown. Our objectives were to describe the frequency and characteristics of tracheal intubation adverse events in pediatric sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of a sepsis registry. SETTING: Two tertiary care academic emergency departments and four affiliated urgent cares within a single children's hospital health system. PATIENTS: Children 60 days and older to 18 years and younger who required nonelective intubation within 24 hours of emergency department arrival. Exclusion criteria included elective intubation, intubation prior to emergency department arrival, presence of tracheostomy, or missing intubation chart data. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The outcome was tracheal intubation adverse event as defined by the National Emergency Airway Registry Tool 4 KIDS. During the study period, 118 of 2,395 registry patients met inclusion criteria; 100% of intubations were successful. First attempt success rate was 57% (95% CI, 48-65%); 59% were intubated in the emergency department, and 28% were intubated in the PICU. First attempts were by a resident (30%), a fellow (42%), attending (6%), and anesthesiologist (13%). Tracheal intubation adverse events were reported in 61 (43%; 95% 43-61%) intubations with severe tracheal intubation adverse events in 22 (17%; 95 CI, 13-27%) intubations. Hypotension was the most common severe event (n = 20 [17%]) with 14 novel occurrences during intubation. Mainstem bronchial intubation was the most common nonsevere event (n = 28 [24%]). Residents, advanced practice providers, and general pediatricians in urgent care settings had the lowest rates of first-pass success. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of tracheal intubation adverse events in this study are higher than in nonelective pediatric intubations in all conditions and highlight the high-risk nature of intubations in pediatric sepsis. Further research is needed to identify optimal practices for intubation in pediatric sepsis.
Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Sepsis/terapia , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The risk of hand/wrist injuries is present across various sports. Little is known about the epidemiology of such injuries. The objective of this study was to calculate the rates of hand/wrist injuries and investigate injury patterns among high school athletes. METHODS: Athlete exposure (AE) and hand/wrist injury data were collected during 11 academic years, 2005/06 through 2015/16, from a large sample of US high schools as part of the National High School Sports-Related Injury Surveillance Study. RESULTS: There were 6723 hand/wrist injuries sustained during 40 195 806 AEs, a rate of 1.7 per 10 000 AEs. The rate of injury in competition (3.3) was higher than in practice (1.1) (95% confidence interval: 2.8-3.1). Rates of hand/wrist injuries varied by sport, with the highest rates in football (4.3), boys' lacrosse (1.9), girls' softball (1.9), wrestling (1.8), girls' field hockey (1.7), boys' ice hockey (1.7), and girls' basketball (1.7). The most common injuries were fracture (45.0%), contusion (11.6%), and ligament sprain (9.0%). Athletes most frequently returned to play in <7 days (45.7%), but 12.4% of injuries kept athletes out ≥3 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: High school athletes are at risk for hand/wrist injuries. Such injuries can keep athletes out of play and many require substantial medical treatment. Stick and ball or puck sports and full contact sports have high rates of hand/wrist injuries relative to other sports, which is indicative of a need for sport-specific prevention efforts.
Asunto(s)
Atletas , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Traumatismos de la Mano/epidemiología , Instituciones Académicas , Traumatismos de la Muñeca/epidemiología , Adolescente , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atomized intranasal midazolam is a common adjunct in pediatrics for procedural anxiolysis. There are no previous studies of validated anxiety scores with pharmacokinetic data to support optimal procedure timing. OBJECTIVES: We describe the clinical and pharmacokinetic profile of atomized intranasal midazolam in children presenting for laceration repair. METHODS: Children 11 months to 7 years of age and weighing <26 kg received 0.4 mg/kg of atomized intranasal midazolam for simple laceration repair. Blood samples were obtained at 3 time points in each patient, and the data were fit with a 1-compartment model. Patient anxiety was rated with the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress. Secondary outcomes included use of adjunctive medications, successful completion of procedure, and adverse events. RESULTS: Sixty-two subjects were enrolled, with a mean age of 3.3 years. The median time to peak midazolam concentration was 10.1 min (interquartile range 9.7-10.8 min), and the median time to the procedure was 26 min (interquartile range 21-34 min). There was a trend in higher Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress scores during the procedure. We observed a total of 2 adverse events, 1 episode of vomiting (1.6%) and 1 paradoxical reaction (1.6%). Procedural completion was successful in 97% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Atomized intranasal midazolam is a safe and effective anxiolytic to facilitate laceration repair. The plasma concentration was >90% of the maximum from 5 to 17 min, suggesting this as an ideal procedural timeframe after intranasal midazolam administration.
Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Anestésicos/farmacocinética , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacocinética , Laceraciones/cirugía , Midazolam/farmacocinética , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Adyuvantes Anestésicos/administración & dosificación , Administración Intranasal , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Lactante , Masculino , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Knowledge of drug use and medication compliance during mental health evaluation can help guide evaluation and treatment. The objective was to evaluate drug use and medication compliance in a pediatric emergency department (PED) psychiatric population by comparing medical history, standard urine drug screen (EIA), and expanded urine drug screen (HPLC-MS/MS). METHODS: A prospective cohort study of admitted psychiatric patients ≥13years and ≤18years in a tertiary-care children's hospital psychiatric ED from January 31, 2013 through April 16, 2014. RESULTS: 100 patients in our PED were enrolled. Marijuana was the most commonly admitted and detected substance; 43% had co-ingestions. HPLC-MS/MS revealed 36 additional substance exposures than identified by history. All substances detected by EIA were also detected by HPLC-MS/MS. Combination of history and HPLC-MS/MS revealed the most substances used. HPLC-MS/MS identified antidepressants in 76% of patients prescribed a detectable antidepressant. CONCLUSION: Marijuana use was greater than nicotine use and was associated with concomitant polysubstance abuse. A combination of history and HPLC-MS/MS was the most thorough in obtaining history of drug use. Almost a quarter of patients did not have their prescribed antidepressant detected by HPLC-MS/MS. A rapid, affordable expanded drug screen should replace the more standard limited drug screen particularly for patients who are refractory to treatment.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Urgencia Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias/métodos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/orina , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Medication organizers may help improve medication compliance; however, they may increase the risk of having an unintentional pediatric exposure. The objective of this study was to measure the association between a pediatric emergency department (ED) visit for an unintentional pharmaceutical ingestion and the use of a medication organizer in the household. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional case control study at a tertiary care children's hospital ED. Cases included subjects <6 years of age who were evaluated in the ED for an unintentional pharmaceutical ingestion. The control group presented to the ED for a non-injury complaint and was matched using age and sex. RESULTS: The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of risk for unintentional pharmaceutical ingestion with use of a medication organizer was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.3, 2.9). After adjusting for the presence of prescription medications in the home, the OR of risk for ingestion remained statistically significant at 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1, 2.7). The child obtained the exposure medication from the medication organizer in 63% of cases where a medication organizer was present in the home. Cases were more likely to have knowledge of, and previous contact with poison control centers (PCC) than non-injury controls. Overall, a large number of caregivers (36%) did not have any knowledge of PCC. There were also differences in smoking and use of seat belts between cases and controls. CONCLUSIONS: The use of medication organizers may be a risk factor for unintentional pediatric pharmaceutical ingestions, even when controlling for the use of prescription medications in the home. Further research is needed to evaluate the specific role of medication organizers, and subsequently, improve prevention strategies.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes Domésticos , Sobredosis de Droga/etiología , Embalaje de Medicamentos , Almacenaje de Medicamentos , Intoxicación/etiología , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/envenenamiento , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Niño , Conducta Infantil , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Sobredosis de Droga/diagnóstico , Sobredosis de Droga/psicología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Intoxicación/diagnóstico , Intoxicación/psicología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Centros de Atención TerciariaAsunto(s)
Bronquiolitis/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicios de Atención a Domicilio Provisto por Hospital , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Factibilidad , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Internet , Alta del Paciente , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The co-administration of ketamine and propofol (CoKP) is thought to maximize the beneficial profile of each medication, while minimizing the respective adverse effects of each medication. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare adverse events between ketamine monotherapy (KM) and CoKP for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in a pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial of KM vs. CoKP in patients between 3 and 21 years of age. The attending physician administered either ketamine 1 mg/kg i.v. or ketamine 0.5 mg/kg and propofol 0.5 mg/kg i.v. The physician could administer up to three additional doses of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg/dose) or ketamine/propofol (0.25 mg/kg/dose of each). Adverse events (e.g., respiratory events, cardiovascular events, unpleasant emergence reactions) were recorded. Secondary outcomes included efficacy, recovery time, and satisfaction scores. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were randomized to KM and 87 patients were randomized to CoKP. There was no difference in adverse events or type of adverse event, except nausea was more common in the KM group. Efficacy of PSA was higher in the KM group (99%) compared to the CoKP group (90%). Median recovery time was the same. Satisfaction scores by providers, including nurses, were higher for KM, although parents were equally satisfied with both sedation regimens. CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant differences in adverse events between the KM and CoKP groups. While CoKP is a reasonable choice for pediatric PSA, our study did not demonstrate an advantage of this combination over KM.
Asunto(s)
Sedación Consciente/efectos adversos , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Ketamina/efectos adversos , Propofol/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Anestésicos Disociativos/farmacología , Anestésicos Disociativos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Ketamina/farmacología , Ketamina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Pediatría/métodos , Propofol/farmacología , Propofol/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laboratory-based experiments demonstrate that fatigue may contribute to lower extremity injury (LEI). Few studies have examined the timing of LEIs during competition and practice, specifically in high school athletes across multiple sports, to consider the possible relationship between fatigue and LEIs during sport events. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to describe the timing of LEIs in high school athletes within games and practices across multiple sports, with a hypothesis that more and severe injuries occur later in games and practices. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiologic study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. METHODS: Using the National High School RIO (Reporting Information Online) sport injury surveillance system, LEI severity and time of occurrence data during practice and competition were extracted for 9 high school sports. RESULTS: During the school years 2005-2006 through 2013-2014, 16,967,702 athlete exposures and 19,676 total LEIs were examined. In all sports surveyed, there was a higher LEI rate, relative risk for LEI, and LEI requiring surgery during competition than practice. During practice, the majority of LEIs occurred over an hour into practice in all sports. In quarter-based competition, more LEIs occurred in the second (31% to 32%) and third quarters (30% to 35%) than in the first (11% to 15%) and fourth quarters (22% to 26%). In games with halves, the majority (53% to 66%) of LEIs occurred in the second half. The greater severity LEIs tended to occur earlier in games. CONCLUSION: Fatigue may play a role in the predominance of injuries in the second half of games, though various factors may be involved. Greater severity of injuries earlier in games may be because of higher energy injuries when athletes are not fatigued. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings can help prepare sports medicine personnel and guide further related research to prevent LEIs.