Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Hum Reprod ; 38(5): 927-937, 2023 05 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36864699

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: Is the total number of oocytes retrieved with dual ovarian stimulation in the same cycle (duostim) higher than with two consecutive antagonist cycles in poor responders? SUMMARY ANSWER: Based on the number of total and mature oocytes retrieved in women with poor ovarian response (POR), there is no benefit of duostim versus two consecutive antagonist cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Recent studies have shown the ability to obtain oocytes with equivalent quality from the follicular and the luteal phase, and a higher number of oocytes within one cycle when using duostim. If during follicular stimulation smaller follicles are sensitized and recruited, this may increase the number of follicles selected in the consecutive luteal phase stimulation, as shown in non-randomized controlled trials (RCT). This could be particularly relevant for women with POR. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a multicentre, open-labelled RCT, performed in four IVF centres from September 2018 to March 2021. The primary outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved over the two cycles. The primary objective was to demonstrate in women with POR that two ovarian stimulations within the same cycle (first in the follicular phase, followed by a second in the luteal phase) led to the retrieval of 1.5 (2) more oocytes than the cumulative number of oocytes from two consecutive conventional stimulations with an antagonist protocol. In a superiority hypothesis, with power 0.8 alpha-risk 0.05 and a 35% cancellation rate, 44 patients were needed in each group. Patients were randomized by computer allocation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Eighty-eight women with POR, defined using adjusted Bologna criteria (antral follicle count ≤5 and/or anti-Müllerian hormone ≤1.2 ng/ml) were randomized, 44 in the duostim group and 44 in the conventional (control) group. HMG 300 IU/day with flexible antagonist protocol was used for ovarian stimulation, except in luteal phase stimulation of the duostim group. In the duostim group, oocytes were pooled and inseminated after the second retrieval, with a freeze-all protocol. Fresh transfers were performed in the control group, frozen embryo transfers were performed in both control and duostim groups in natural cycles. Data underwent intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was no difference between the groups regarding demographics, ovarian reserve markers, and stimulation parameters. The mean (SD) cumulative number of oocytes retrieved from two ovarian stimulations was not statistically different between the control and duostim groups, respectively, 4.6 (3.4) and 5.0 (3.4) [mean difference (MD) [95% CI] +0.4 [-1.1; 1.9], P = 0.56]. The mean cumulative numbersof mature oocytes and total embryos obtained were not significantly different between groups. The total number of embryos transferred by patient was significantly higher in the control group 1.5 (1.1) versus the duostim group 0.9 (1.1) (P = 0.03). After two cumulative cycles, 78% of women in the control group and 53.8% in the duostim group had at least one embryo transfer (P = 0.02). There was no statistical difference in the mean number of total and mature oocytes retrieved per cycle comparing Cycle 1 versus Cycle 2, both in control and duostim groups. The time to the second oocyte retrieval was significantly longer in controls, at 2.8 (1.3) months compared to 0.3 (0.5) months in the duostim group (P < 0.001). The implantation rate was similar between groups. The cumulative live birth rate was not statistically different, comparing controls versus the duostim group, 34.1% versus 17.9%, respectively (P = 0.08). The time to transfer resulting in an ongoing pregnancy did not differ in controls 1.7 (1.5) months versus the duostim group, 3.0 (1.6) (P = 0.08). No serious adverse events were reported. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The RCT was impacted by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and the halt in IVF activities for 10 weeks. Delays were recalculated to exclude this period; however, one woman in the duostim group could not have the luteal stimulation. We also faced unexpected good ovarian responses and pregnancies after the first oocyte retrieval in both groups, with a higher incidence in the control group. However, our hypothesis was based on 1.5 more oocytes in the luteal than the follicular phase in the duostim group, and the number of patients to treat was reached in this group (N = 28). This study was only powered for cumulative number of oocytes retrieved. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first RCT comparing the outcome of two consecutive cycles, either in the same menstrual cycle or in two consecutive menstrual cycles. In routine practice, the benefit of duostim in patients with POR regarding fresh embryo transfer is not confirmed in this RCT: first, because this study demonstrates no improvement in the number of oocytes retrieved in the luteal phase after follicular phase stimulation, in contrast to previous non-randomized studies, and second, because the freeze-all strategy avoids a pregnancy with fresh embryo transfer after the first cycle. However, duostim appears to be safe for women. In duostim, the two consecutive processes of freezing/thawing are mandatory and increase the risk of wastage of oocytes/embryos. The only benefit of duostim is to shorten the time to a second retrieval by 2 weeks if accumulation of oocytes/embryos is needed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This is an investigator-initiated study supported by a research Grant from IBSA Pharma. N.M. declares grants paid to their institution from MSD (Organon France); consulting fees from MSD (Organon France), Ferring, and Merck KGaA; honoraria from Merck KGaA, General Electrics, Genevrier (IBSA Pharma), and Theramex; support for travel and meetings from Theramex, Merck KGaG, and Gedeon Richter; and equipment paid to their institution from Goodlife Pharma. I.A. declares honoraria from GISKIT and support for travel and meetings from GISKIT. G.P.-B. declares Consulting fees from Ferring and Merck KGaA; honoraria from Theramex, Gedeon Richter, and Ferring; payment for expert testimony from Ferring, Merck KGaA, and Gedeon Richter; and support for travel and meetings from Ferring, Theramex, and Gedeon Richter. N.C. declares grants from IBSA pharma, Merck KGaA, Ferring, and Gedeon Richter; support for travel and meetings from IBSA pharma, Merck KGaG, MSD (Organon France), Gedeon Richter, and Theramex; and participation on advisory board from Merck KGaA. E.D. declares support for travel and meetings from IBSA pharma, Merck KGaG, MSD (Organon France), Ferring, Gedeon Richter, Theramex, and General Electrics. C.P.-V. declares support for travel and meetings from IBSA Pharma, Merck KGaA, Ferring, Gedeon Richter, and Theramex. M.Pi. declares support for travel and meetings from Ferring, Gedeon Richetr, and Merck KGaA. M.Pa. declares honoraria from Merck KGaA, Theramex, and Gedeon Richter; support for travel and meetings from Merck KGaA, IBSA Pharma, Theramex, Ferring, Gedeon Richter, and MSD (Organon France). H.B.-G. declares honoraria from Merck KGaA, and Gedeon Richter and support for travel and meetings from Ferring, Merck KGaA, IBSA Pharma, MSD (Organon France), Theramex, and Gedeon Richter. S.G. and M.B. have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registration number EudraCT: 2017-003223-30. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03803228. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: EudraCT: 28 July 2017. ClinicalTrials.gov: 14 January 2019. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 3 September 2018.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Índice de Embarazo , Ovario , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos
2.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 50(6): 455-461, 2022 06.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34999287

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to compare the live birth rate and miscarriage rate after fresh embryo transfer (Fresh ET) when patients are treated either with oral dydrogesterone or micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) as luteal phase support (LPS). The vaginal route is still preferred, despite the discomfort for the patients and recent RCTs showing similar results for dydrogesterone and MVP. METHODS: All 556 consecutive Fresh ET after autologous IVF procedure, from December 2011 to March 2013 in one centre in France were included. Patients were treated either with dydrogesterone 10mg every 12hours (n=267) or MVP 200mg every 12hours (n=289), the physician's arbitrary choice on the day of the oocyte aspiration procedure. RESULTS: The groups were comparable regarding the demographic data and stimulation protocols, except for the rank of the oocyte pickup procedure [1.54±0.80 vs. 1.74±0.96, (P=0.01)], with no significant difference in live birth rates (22.4% vs. 23.8%, P=0.77) and miscarriage rates (4.1% vs. 5.5%, P=0.55) for dydrogesterone vs. MVP respectively. The results were similar in a good prognosis patients' subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: LPS with either dydrogesterone or MVP after Fresh ET showed similar live birth rates and miscarriage rates. The benefits of the oral over vaginal route might be higher tolerance and possibly better compliance. Dydrogesterone seems to be a safe treatment, but its long-term innocuity needs to be further proven.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo , Didrogesterona , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Didrogesterona/efectos adversos , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Humanos , Lipopolisacáridos , Fase Luteínica , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Progesterona
3.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 51(1): 102233, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34571198

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the predictive value of AFC for ovarian response to stimulation for IVF depends on the day of the menstrual cycle when ultrasound is performed. METHODS: 410 women undergoing their first IVF cycle were included. All the women had AFC performed twice. The first measurement, random AFC (r-AFC), was performed during the fertility workup whatever the day of their menstrual cycle. Three groups were constituted according to the period of ultrasound performance: at early follicular phase i.e., day 1 to day 6 (eFP-AFC); at mid follicular phase i.e., day 7 to 12 (mFP-AFC) and at luteal phase i.e., day 13 or after (LP-AFC). A second AFC measurement was performed before the start of the ovarian stimulation (SD1-AFC). AMH dosing was done in the early follicular phase. RESULTS: Random AFC (r-AFC) was correlated to AMH (r = 0.69; p<0.001), SD1-AFC (r = 0.75; p<0.001) and number of oocytes retrieved (r = 0.49; p<0.001). When regarding AFC depending on the cycle day group, the correlation with AMH was 0.65, 0.66 and 0.85 for the eFP-AFC, the mFP-AFC and the LP-AFC respectively (all p were <0.001). The ROC analysis showed the same predictive value for good ovarian response (more than 6 oocytes retrieved) for the eFP-AFC, mFP-AFC and LP-AFC (AUC 0.73, 0.75 and 0.84 respectively; p = 0.28). The AUC of r-AFC (0.76) were similar to those of AMH (0.74) and SD1-AFC (0.74) (p = 0.21 and 0.92 respectively). CONCLUSION: AFC is strongly correlated with AMH and highly predictive of good ovarian response during the whole menstrual cycle.


Asunto(s)
Hormona Antimülleriana/análisis , Fase Folicular/metabolismo , Folículo Ovárico/diagnóstico por imagen , Inducción de la Ovulación/instrumentación , Adulto , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Fertilización In Vitro/tendencias , Fase Folicular/fisiología , Humanos , Folículo Ovárico/fisiología , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Ann Endocrinol (Paris) ; 71(3): 158-62, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20363464

RESUMEN

Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadisms (CHH) are a well-known cause of pubertal development failure in women. In a majority of patients, the clinical spectrum results from an insufficient and concomitant secretion of both pituitary gonadotropins LH and FSH that impedes a normal endocrine and exocrine cyclical ovary functioning after the age of pubertal activation of gonadotropic axis. In exceptional but interesting cases, they can result from an elective deficit of one of the gonadotropins follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or luteinizing hormone (LH) by genetic anomaly of their specific ss sub-unit. CHH prevalence, estimated from teaching hospital series, is considered to be two to five fold less important in women compared to men bearing the disease. This frequency is probably under-estimated in reason of under-diagnosis of forms with partial pubertal development. Isolated or apparently isolated forms (i.e., Kallmann syndrome with anosmia or hyposmia not spontaneously expressed by the patients) of these diseases are most of the time discovered during adolescence or in adulthood in reason of lacking, incomplete or even apparently complete pubertal development, but with almost constant primary amenorrhea. In a minority of cases and mainly in familial forms, genetic autosomal causes have been found. These cases are related to mutations of genes impinging the functioning of the pituitary-hypothalamic pathways involved in the normal secretion of LH and FSH (mutations of GnRHR, GnRH1, KISS1R/GPR54, TAC3, TACR3), which are always associated to isolated non syndromic CHH without anosmia. Some cases of mutations of FGFR1, and more rarely of its ligand FGF8, or of PROKR2 or its ligand PROK2 have been shown in women suffering from Kallmann syndrome or its hyposmic or normosmic variant. In complex syndromic causes (mutations of CHD7, leptin and leptin receptor anomalies, Prader-Willi syndrome, etc.), diagnosis of the CHH cause is most often suspected or set down before the age of puberty in reason of the associated clinical signs, but some rare cases of paucisymptomatic syndromic causes can initially be revealed during adolescence, like isolated non syndromic CHH or Kallmann syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Hipogonadismo/genética , Femenino , Factor 8 de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/deficiencia , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/genética , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/fisiología , Hormonas Gastrointestinales/genética , Humanos , Hipogonadismo/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Kallmann/genética , Leptina/genética , Hormona Luteinizante/deficiencia , Hormona Luteinizante/genética , Hormona Luteinizante/fisiología , Mutación , Neuropéptidos/genética , Folículo Ovárico/citología , Folículo Ovárico/fisiología , Ovulación , Síndrome de Prader-Willi/genética , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/genética , Pubertad , Receptor Tipo 1 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/genética , Receptores de Leptina/genética , Receptores de Péptidos/genética , Células Tecales/citología , Células Tecales/fisiología
5.
Hum Reprod ; 21(11): 2941-7, 2006 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16877377

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In normo-ovulatory infertile women undergoing mild ovarian stimulation out of IVF, FSH stimulation regimen must be carefully adjusted to control the number of recruited follicles and to prevent multiple pregnancies. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effect of the timing of FSH administration (fixed dose and duration) on the number of large follicles. METHODS: Women were prospectively randomized by means of sealed envelopes to receive daily 112.5 IU recombinant FSH (rFSH), either from cycle day (CD) 2-6 (Group A) or from CD 7-11 (Group B). Hormonal measurements and follicular ultrasound assessments were performed on CD 2, 7 and 12. RESULTS: On CD 12, the development rate of exactly two follicles >or=14 mm in diameter was significantly lower in Group A than in Group B (4% of women versus 42%, P = 0.002). Although the pattern of serum estradiol (E(2)) concentrations in Group A displayed a plateau from CD 7, the cancellation rate for overstimulation (more than three follicles >or=14 mm in diameter) was significantly increased (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Preventing the closure of the FSH window by mid to late follicular phase FSH administration better fulfils the objective of obtaining a limited number of large follicles than surpassing the FSH threshold by an early administration.


Asunto(s)
Hormona Folículo Estimulante/farmacología , Fase Folicular/fisiología , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Estradiol/sangre , Femenino , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/sangre , Fase Folicular/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Hormona Luteinizante/sangre , Ciclo Menstrual/efectos de los fármacos , Ciclo Menstrual/fisiología , Folículo Ovárico/diagnóstico por imagen , Folículo Ovárico/fisiología , Ovulación/efectos de los fármacos , Ovulación/fisiología , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacología , Valores de Referencia , Ultrasonografía
6.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun ; 345(2): 754-60, 2006 Jun 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16701564

RESUMEN

The properties of the insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBP-1 to 6) are not limited to modulation of IGF actions. IGFBP-1, which shares an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif in its C-terminal domain, modulates cell motility by binding to integrin alpha5beta1. The cross-talks between integrins and growth factor receptor signalling pathways are extensively documented, particularly in the case of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, whether IGFBP-1 can modulate growth factor signalling through its interaction with integrin alpha5beta1 has not yet been studied. As EGF is involved in the decidualisation of endometrial stromal cells (ESCs) and as decidualised ESCs are a source of IGFBP-1, we investigated if IGFBP-1 can modulate EGF effects on ESCs. RGD- and IGF-independent inhibition of EGF mitogenic activity and EGFR signalling by IGFBP-1 were demonstrated in ESC primary cultures, A431, cells and in mouse fibroblasts lacking IGF receptors.


Asunto(s)
Endometrio/citología , Factor de Crecimiento Epidérmico/efectos de los fármacos , Proteína 1 de Unión a Factor de Crecimiento Similar a la Insulina/farmacología , Mitosis/efectos de los fármacos , Células del Estroma/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Células Cultivadas , Factor de Crecimiento Epidérmico/antagonistas & inhibidores , Factor de Crecimiento Epidérmico/metabolismo , Femenino , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Integrina alfa5beta1/metabolismo , Ratones , Mitosis/fisiología , Oligopéptidos/genética , Receptor IGF Tipo 1/metabolismo , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Células del Estroma/citología , Células del Estroma/metabolismo
7.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 7(2): 179-84, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14567886

RESUMEN

A short follicular phase is an early clinical feature of declining reproductive competence. The shortening of the follicular phase length is related to both advanced recruitment and selection of the dominant follicle secondary to an earlier and higher FSH rise during the luteal-follicular transition, while the late follicular growth is normal. As a short follicular phase may be detrimental for reproduction, it was postulated that increasing the duration of follicular phase could improve conception rate. For that purpose, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist minidoses were administered in the mid-luteal phase to prevent the intercycle FSH rise before tailoring follicular growth by controlled exogenous FSH administration. This regimen, applied to 69 infertile ovulatory women with a short follicular phase (9.6 +/- 1.2 days) actually lengthened the follicular phase by about 3 days. It proved to be effective in 179 cycles to induce paucifollicular development (1.8 +/- 0.9 follicles) with a low cancellation rate (4%) and a moderate requirement for gonadotrophins [13.3 +/- 6.3 ampoules (75 IU)]. In those women with a high frequency (80%) of elevated basal FSH or oestradiol concentrations, the pregnancy rate reached 15.1%/cycle but the miscarriage rate remained high (44%). Thus, increasing the follicular phase length in patients with a short follicular phase may partially restore fecundity.


Asunto(s)
Fase Folicular/efectos de los fármacos , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Infertilidad Femenina/tratamiento farmacológico , Inducción de la Ovulación , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Estradiol/sangre , Femenino , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/administración & dosificación , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/sangre , Humanos , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo
8.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 31(3): 265-74, 2003 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12770812

RESUMEN

Polycystic ovary syndrome is a frequent endocrine disorder often associated with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia which may play a role in hyperandrogenism and anovulation. The use of "insulin sensitizing" agents has been suggested to reduce insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism. In that respect, the use of metformin in polycystic ovary syndrome is reviewed. Although its mechanism of action is still unclear, metformin proved to be effective to restore cyclicity and spontaneous ovulation. The synergistic effect of clomiphene citrate and metformin was demonstrated in some studies, suggesting that metformin could be helpful for women with clomiphene citrate resistance. However, the potential effect of metformin administration for reducing hyperstimulation in women treated with exogenous FSH, or for preventing early miscarriages has to be confirmed. Here, we propose a guideline for the use of metformin, as an adjuvant therapy, to restore cyclicity and ovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Hiperinsulinismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Infertilidad Femenina/tratamiento farmacológico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/tratamiento farmacológico , Clomifeno/uso terapéutico , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Antagonistas de Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hiperandrogenismo/complicaciones , Hiperandrogenismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperinsulinismo/complicaciones , Infertilidad Femenina/complicaciones , Resistencia a la Insulina , Ovulación/efectos de los fármacos , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 87(8): 3893-901, 2002 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12161529

RESUMEN

Our study aims to provide a comprehensive view of the endocrine features in Kennedy's disease (KD). Twenty-two men with KD underwent detailed endocrine investigations. Clinical signs of partial androgen resistance were present in more than 80% of the patients, with gynecomastia being the most prominent. Gynecomastia was postpubertal but appeared before muscular weakness in most cases. Thirteen patients had alteration of testicular exocrine function. Hormonal profile of partial androgen resistance was present in 86% of the patients, with an elevated testosterone level in 68%. Androgen insensitivity seems to appear later in life in KD, similar to the development of neurological signs. Although we confirm the previously reported correlation between the CAG repeat length and the early onset of the neurological disease, we describe a significant correlation between repeat length and the age of onset of gynecomastia as well as biological indexes of androgen insensitivity. This is supported by numerous in vitro data correlating variations in the CAG tract with androgen receptor activity; the longer the CAG repeats, the weaker the receptor transactivation. Ours is the first study to show such a clear and prominent pattern of androgen insensitivity in KD. In clinical practice, KD patients are often misdiagnosed as having amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Careful examination of the endocrine component could avoid such a deleterious misdiagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Andrógenos/metabolismo , Atrofia Muscular Espinal/genética , Atrofia Muscular Espinal/metabolismo , Receptores Androgénicos/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Atrofia , Glucemia , Colesterol/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Estradiol/sangre , Genotipo , Ginecomastia/genética , Ginecomastia/metabolismo , Ginecomastia/patología , Humanos , Hormona Luteinizante/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Debilidad Muscular/genética , Debilidad Muscular/metabolismo , Debilidad Muscular/patología , Atrofia Muscular Espinal/patología , Fenotipo , Receptores Androgénicos/metabolismo , Testículo/patología , Testosterona/sangre , Repeticiones de Trinucleótidos
10.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 18(4): 191-6, 2001 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11432109

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the efficiency and efficacy of two recombinant human FSH (r-FSH) and urinary (u-FSH) preparations in patients undergoing superovulation for IVF-ET using a short-term gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) (Triptorelin) protocol. METHODS: A total of 88 women undergoing IVF-ET were included in this prospective study. They were randomized to receive u-FSH (150 IU/d), follitropin-alpha (100 IU/d), or follitropin-beta (100 IU/d) for 2 days, and dosages were subsequently adjusted according to the ovarian response. RESULTS: The FSH dose required for the overall stimulation was significantly lower in patients treated with r-FSH than in those treated with u-FSH while serum FSH values were higher in the latter group. There were no statistically significant differences in ovarian response and IVF outcome between r-FSH preparations. CONCLUSIONS: Recombinant FSH preparations have a higher efficiency than urinary ones in patients undergoing IVF-ET using a short-term GnRH-a protocol. In this situation, the two recombinant follitropins have comparable effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Embrión , Fertilización In Vitro/efectos de los fármacos , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/farmacología , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/orina , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Adolescente , Adulto , Estradiol/sangre , Femenino , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ovario/efectos de los fármacos , Progesterona/sangre , Radioinmunoensayo , Distribución Aleatoria , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacología , Superovulación/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Tiempo
11.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 28(11): 820-31, 2000 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11127034

RESUMEN

Performance of intra-uterine insemination (IIU) is generally advocated as a first line therapy for infertility related to cercical hostility, male factor, unexplained infertility or mild endometriosis. IIU are usually performed following stimulation of ovulation, even in absence of anovulation. However the rationale for such a systematic ovulation induction is still questionable. Indeed, while an overall assessment of ovarian stimulation tends to conclude to a beneficial effect of these treatments in unexplained or some male infertility, it is clear that no definitive conclusion can be drawn. Indeed, the methodology in many published series is mostly inadequate, data are usually not analysed according to the type of infertility or to the female hormonal features. Finally, adverse effects are imperfectly descripted. A more accurate analysis of these data in relation to the number of recruited follicles definitively shows that, if a bifollicular development is associated with a significant increase in the pregnancy rates, there is no advantage to stimulate further the ovary. Indeed, surpassing the recruitment of two follicles would lead to dramatically increase the risk of OHSS and multiple pregnancies. Thus, further investigations including prospective, randomized studies are needed to better define what should be the most adequate regimen of ovulation induction. Specifically, tailoring the rate of multifollicular development according to the duration, the type of infertility (etiology; primary or secondary; female age) would prove to be a safer approach for getting pregnancy as well as avoiding adverse effects. Such a policy remains to be determined in the light of further clinical studies conducted in the more appropriate manner.


Asunto(s)
Inseminación , Inducción de la Ovulación , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad/etiología , Infertilidad/terapia , Inseminación Artificial , Masculino , Embarazo , Embarazo Múltiple , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA