The Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score Combined with Procalcitonin and Lung Ultrasound (CPIS-PLUS), a Good Tool for Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Early Diagnosis in Pediatrics.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is common in Pediatric Intensive Care Units. Although early detection is crucial, current diagnostic methods are not definitive. This study aimed to identify lung ultrasound (LUS) findings and procalcitonin (PCT) values in pediatric patients with VAP to create a new early diagnosis score combined with the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS), the CPIS-PLUS score. Prospective longitudinal and interventional study. Pediatric patients with suspected VAP were included and classified into VAP or non-VAP groups, based on Centers of Disease Control (CDC) criteria for the final diagnosis. A chest-X-ray (CXR), LUS, and blood test were performed within the first 12 h of admission. CPIS score was calculated. A total of 108 patients with VAP suspicion were included, and VAP was finally diagnosed in 51 (47%) patients. CPIS-PLUS showed high accuracy in VAP diagnosis with a sensitivity (Sn) of 80% (95% CI 65-89%) and specificity (Sp) of 73% (95% CI 54-86%). The area under the curve (AUC) resulted in 0.86 for CPIS-PLUS vs. 0.61 for CPIS. In conclusion, this pilot study showed that CPIS-PLUS could be a potential and reliable tool for VAP early diagnosis in pediatric patients. Internal and external validations are needed to confirm the potential value of this score to facilitate VAP diagnosis in pediatric patients.

Predictores del estado de salud funcional posingreso en cuidados intensivos en pacientes sépticos / Predictors of Post-Admission Functional Health Status in Intensive Care in Septic Patients

Introducción: Los pacientes críticos pediátricos son susceptibles de presentar alteraciones del flujo sanguíneo cerebral que impliquen un deterioro de su estado de salud funcional. Objetivo: Identificar factores predictores de mayor riesgo de mala evolución funcional en pacientes pediátricos críticos con sepsis. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo con menores de 18 años de edad con sepsis, ingresados en la unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos. Se recogieron variables epidemiológicas, clínicas y del estado de salud funcional previas al ingreso, al alta y a los 6 meses. El estado de salud funcional se evaluó mediante la escala de categorías de estado global y cerebral pediátrico. Se evaluó el cambio del estado funcional entre el ingreso y a los 6 meses del alta. Se realizó un análisis univariante para comparar grupos considerando el mal pronóstico y el cambio del estado funcional y su relación con las variables. Resultados: Se incluyeron 46 pacientes. A los 6 meses del alta, cuatro (8,7 por ciento) presentaron mal pronóstico funcional y ocho (17,4 por ciento) empeoramiento funcional respecto al ingreso. No se encontraron asociaciones entre las variables predictoras y la morbilidad, aunque se observó cierta tendencia en algunas como mayor soporte inotrópico (VIS > 20: 12,5 por ciento vs. 50 por ciento, p= 0,075), extracorpóreo y de reemplazo renal (25 por ciento vs. 2,6 por ciento, p= 0,074) y estancia hospitalaria más prolongada (50 por ciento vs. 15,8 por ciento , p= 0,055). Conclusiones: El soporte en la unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos no fue un predictor de morbilidad funcional en la muestra(AU)

Introduction: Critically ill pediatric patients are susceptible to cerebral blood flow alterations that imply a deterioration of their functional health status. Objective: To identify predictors of a higher risk of poor functional outcome in critically ill pediatric patients with sepsis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with children under 18 years of age with sepsis, who were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Epidemiological, clinical, and functional health status variables were collected prior to admission, discharge, and after 6 months. Functional health status was assessed using the Pediatric Global State and Brain Status Category Scale. The change in performance status between admission and 6 months after discharge was assessed. A univariate analysis was performed to compare groups considering poor prognosis and change in functional status and their relationship with the variables. Results: A total of 46 patients were included. At 6 months after discharge, four (8.7 percent) had a poor functional prognosis and eight (17.4 percent) had functional worsening at admission. No associations were found between the predictor variables and morbidity, although some trends were observed in some variables, such as greater inotropic support (SIV > 20: 12.5 percent vs. 50 percent, p = 0.075), extracorporeal and renal replacement (25 percent vs. 2.6 , percent p = 0.074), and longer hospital stay (50 percent vs. 15.8 percent , p = 0.055). Conclusions: Support in the pediatric intensive care unit was not a predictor of functional morbidity in the sample(AU)

End-of-life decision-making in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Most paediatric deaths occur in the neonatal period, many of them in neonatal intensive care units after withdrawal of life support or the decision not to initiate new treatments. In these circumstances, discussions with families and decision-making are fundamental elements of the care and attention given to newborn babies. In this context, bioethical deliberation can help us to identify the values at stake, the different courses of action to be taken, and the means to ensure that family-shared decision-making is appropriate to the patient's situation and in accordance with the family's values.

Lung Recruitment Maneuvers Assessment by Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

The use of recruitment maneuvers (RMs) is suggested to improve severe oxygenation failure in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a non-invasive, safe, and easily repeatable tool. It could be used to monitor the lung recruitment process in real-time. This paper aims to evaluate bedside LUS for assessing PEEP-induced pulmonary reaeration during RMs in pediatric patients. A case of a child with severe ARDS due to Haemophilus influenzae infection is presented. Due to his poor clinical, laboratory, and radiological evolution, he was placed on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Despite all measures, severe pulmonary collapse prevented proper improvement. Thus, RMs were indicated, and bedside LUS was successfully used for monitoring and assessing lung recruitment. The initial lung evaluation before the maneuver showed a tissue pattern characterized by a severe loss of lung aeration with dynamic air bronchograms and multiple coalescent B-lines. While raising a PEEP of 30 mmH2O, LUS showed the presence of A-lines, which was considered a predictor of reaeration in response to the recruitment maneuver. The LUS pattern could be used to assess modifications in the lung aeration, evaluate the effectiveness of RMs, and prevent lung overdistension.

Randomized trial: inflammatory response to corticoids versus placebo in moderate and severe bronchiolitis. COTHEB study

ABSTRACT Introduction: The use of corticosteroids has been shown not to improve the prognosis of patients with bronchiolitis, but it could be assumed that steroids will reduce inflammation. Objective: This study aimed to assess whether corticoid therapy influenced the inflammatory and clinical response of critically ill infants. Methods: Prospective, randomized, double blind placebo-controlled trial of glucocorticoids (GCT) in infants of less than 12 months with severe or moderate bronchiolitis. Patients were randomized to receive systemic corticoid therapy (low dose for 7 days) or placebo. The main outcomes were: a) levels of lymphocyte subsets; b) levels of IL-2, IL-12, and IFNγ as pro-inflammatory factors, and c) levels of IL-4 and IL-10 as anti-inflammatory response. Secondary outcomes related with the clinical response were also analyzed. Results: 97 patients were randomized. Evolution of lymphocyte subsets was similar in both groups. Pro-inflammatory interleukins and interferon decreased, but without differences. Anti-inflammatory interleukins showed a significant decrease from baseline to the end of the study, and IL-10 values were significantly lower (p = 0.046) in the GCT group [1.82 pg/ml (1.2-3.5)] vs non-GCT [4 pg/ml (1.5-6.3)]. GCT group showed a lower time of mechanical ventilation and of hospitalization, but without statistically significant differences. No cases of severe adverse reaction to steroids were detected. Conclusions: Administration of systemic GCT did not modify the inflammatory nor the clinical response of patients with severe bronchiolitis, except for IL-10 levels that were significantly lower in the GCT group. This can open a line of investigation about the relation of IL-10 and response to bronchiolitis.

RESUMEN Introducción: Se ha demostrado que los glucocorticoides no mejoran el pronóstico de pacientes con bronquiolitis, pero se podría suponer que reducen la inflamación. Objetivo: Evaluar si los glucocorticoides influyen en la respuesta inflamatoria y clínica de los lactantes críticos. Métodos: Ensayo prospectivo, aleatorizado, doble ciego, controlado con placebo en lactantes < 12 meses con bronquiolitis grave y administración de glucocorticoides sistémicos (dosis bajas 7 días). Se examinaron: a) concentraciones de subconjuntos de linfocitos; b) concentraciones de IL-2, IL-12 e IFNγ como factores proinflamatorios, y c) concentraciones de IL-4 e IL-10 como respuesta antiinflamatoria. También se analizaron los resultados relacionados con la respuesta clínica. Resultados: Se aleatorizaron 97 pacientes. La evolución de los subconjuntos de linfocitos fue similar en ambos grupos. Disminuyeron las interleucinas proinflamatorias y el interferón, pero sin diferencias. Las interleucinas antiinflamatorias mostraron una disminución significativa desde el inicio hasta el final del estudio, y los valores de IL-10 fueron significativamente más bajos (p= 0,046) en el grupo de glucocorticoides [1,82 pg/ml (1,2-3,5)] frente a los no glucocorticoides [4 pg/ml (1,5 - 6,3)]. El grupo glucocorticoides mostró menor tiempo de ventilación mecánica y de hospitalización, pero sin diferencias significativas. No se detectaron reacciones adversas graves a glucocorticoides. Conclusiones: La administración de glucocorticoides sistémicos no modificó la respuesta inflamatoria ni clínica de los pacientes con bronquiolitis severa, excepto las concentraciones de IL-10 que fueron significativamente menores en el grupo de glucocorticoides. Esto puede abrir una línea de investigación sobre la relación de IL-10 y la respuesta a la bronquiolitis.

Hipertensión pulmonar grave como inicio de la enfermedad metabólica / Severe Pulmonary Hypertension as the Debut of Metabolic Disease

No disponible

Comparison in the Management of Respiratory Failure due to Bronchiolitis in a Pediatric ICU Between 2010 and 2016.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, respiratory support in severe bronchiolitis has changed in several aspects: increased use of noninvasive ventilation, new equipment, and implementation of high-flow nasal cannula therapy. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness of the changes progressively introduced in the respiratory support of patients with bronchiolitis to reduce the intubation rate. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, descriptive study. Patients admitted to the pediatric ICU of Hospital Sant Joan de Déu (Barcelona, Spain) with respiratory failure due to bronchiolitis in the 2010-2011 and 2016-2017 periods were included. Exclusion criteria were the following: patients who were previously intubated and tracheostomized and patients > 1 y. Data collected were demographic, clinical, and ventilatory variables, including the type, equipment used, and length of the respiratory support received. RESULTS: A total of 161 subjects were included: 53 in the 2010-2011 period and 108 in the 2016-2017 period. No clinical differences were observed except the incidence of previous apnea, a diagnosis of sepsis, and procalcitonin values on admission that were higher in the first period. High-flow nasal cannula use before pediatric ICU admission was significantly higher in 2016-2017. A significant increase in the use of the total face mask was observed. The need for invasive ventilation decreased from 37.7% to 17.5%. In the multivariate study, use of interfaces other than the total face mask was identified as the only independent predictive factor for noninvasive ventilation failure, with an odds ratio of 2.5, 95% CI 1.04-6.2 (P = .040). CONCLUSIONS: An important reduction in invasive ventilation was observed. An independent predictive factor for noninvasive ventilation failure was in using an interface other than the total face mask. Implementation of high-flow nasal cannula has not been identified as an independent protective factor for intubation.

[Admission, discharge and triage guidelines for paediatric intensive care units in Spain]. / Guias de ingreso, alta y triage para las unidades de cuidados intensivos pediátricos en España.

A paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is a separate physical facility or unit specifically designed for the treatment of paediatric patients who, because of the severity of illness or other life-threatening conditions, require comprehensive and continuous inten-sive care by a medical team with special skills in paediatric intensive care medicine. Timely and personal intervention in intensive care reduces mortality, reduces length of stay, and decreases cost of care. With the aim of defending the right of the child to receive the highest attainable standard of health and the facilities for the treatment of illness and rehabilitation, as well as ensuring the quality of care and the safety of critically ill paediatric patients, the Spanish Association of Paediatrics (AEP), Spanish Society of Paediatric Intensive Care (SECIP) and Spanish Society of Critical Care (SEMICYUC) have approved the guidelines for the admission, discharge and triage for Spanish PICUs. By using these guidelines, the performance of Spanish paediatric intensive care units can be optimised and paediatric patients can receive the appropriate level of care for their clinical condition.

Guias de ingreso, alta y triage para las unidades de cuidados intensivos pediátricos en España / Admission, discharge and triage guidelines for paediatric intensive care units in Spain

La unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos (UCIP) es una unidad física asistencial hospitalaria independiente especialmente diseñada para el tratamiento de pacientes pediátricos quienes debido su gravedad o condiciones potencialmente letales requieren observación y asistencia médica intensiva integral y continua por un equipo médico que haya obtenido competencia especial en medicina intensiva pediátrica. La aplicación oportuna de terapia intensiva a los pacientes críticos reduce la mortalidad, el tiempo de estancia y los costes asistenciales. Con los objetivos de respetar el derecho del niño al disfrute del más alto nivel posible de salud y a servicios para el tratamiento de las enfermedades y la rehabilitación de la salud y de garantizar la calidad asistencial y la seguridad de los pacientes pediátricos críticos, la Asociación Española de Pediatría (AEP), la Sociedad Española de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (SECIP) y la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC) han desarrollado y aprobado las guías de ingreso, alta y triage para las UCIP en España. Mediante la aplicación de estas guías se puede optimizar el uso de las UCIP españolas de forma que los pacientes pediátricos reciban el nivel de cuidados médicos más apropiado para su situación clínica

A paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is a separate physical facility or unit specifically designed for the treatment of paediatric patients who, because of the severity of illness or other life-threatening conditions, require comprehensive and continuous inten-sive care by a medical team with special skills in paediatric intensive care medicine. Timely and personal intervention in intensive care reduces mortality, reduces length of stay, and decreases cost of care. With the aim of defending the right of the child to receive the highest attainable standard of health and the facilities for the treatment of illness and rehabilitation, as well as ensuring the quality of care and the safety of critically ill paediatric patients, the Spanish Association of Paediatrics (AEP), Spanish Society of Paediatric Intensive Care (SECIP) and Spanish Society of Critical Care (SEMICYUC) have approved the guidelines for the admission, discharge and triage for Spanish PICUs. By using these guidelines, the performance of Spanish paediatric intensive care units can be optimised and paediatric patients can receive the appropriate level of care for their clinical condition

Admission, discharge and triage guidelines for paediatric intensive care units in Spain. / Guias de ingreso, alta y triage para las unidades de cuidados intensivos pediátricos en España.

A paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is a separate physical facility or unit specifically designed for the treatment of paediatric patients who, because of the severity of illness or other life-threatening conditions, require comprehensive and continuous inten-sive care by a medical team with special skills in paediatric intensive care medicine. Timely and personal intervention in intensive care reduces mortality, reduces length of stay, and decreases cost of care. With the aim of defending the right of the child to receive the highest attainable standard of health and the facilities for the treatment of illness and rehabilitation, as well as ensuring the quality of care and the safety of critically ill paediatric patients, the Spanish Association of Paediatrics (AEP), Spanish Society of Paediatric Intensive Care (SECIP) and Spanish Society of Critical Care (SEMICYUC) have approved the guidelines for the admission, discharge and triage for Spanish PICUs. By using these guidelines, the performance of Spanish paediatric intensive care units can be optimised and paediatric patients can receive the appropriate level of care for their clinical condition.

Más de 3 horas y menos de 3 años: Seguridad de procedimientos anestésicos en menores de 3 años sometidos a cirugía de más de 3 horas / More than 3 hours and less than 3 years: Safety of anaesthetic procedures in infants less than 3 years old subected to surgery for more the 3 hours

La alerta de la FDA de diciembre 2016, sobre la seguridad de la anestesia general y las sedaciones en pacientes menores de 3 años y en mujeres embarazadas, ha suscitado numerosas dudas sobre la actitud que deben tomar los profesionales implicados en el tratamiento de estos pacientes. Ante esta situación, las siguientes sociedades científicas médicas: Sociedad Española de Anestesia y Reanimación (SEDAR), Sociedad Española de Cirugía Pediátrica (SECP), Sociedad Española de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (SECIP) y Sociedad Española de Neonatología (SENeo), han constituido un grupo de trabajo para analizar y clarificar la seguridad de estas técnicas. En este artículo concluimos que en el momento actual tanto la anestesia general como la sedación profunda deben seguir siendo consideradas como técnicas seguras, porque no existen evidencias de lo contrario en estudios con seres humanos. Esta seguridad no nos permite ignorar el problema, que debe ser seguido con atención, fundamentalmente en pacientes de menos de 3 años, sometidos a procedimientos anestésicos de más de 3 horas o a sedaciones prolongadas en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales o Pediátricos (AU)

An FDA alert in December 2016 on the safety of general anesthesia and sedations in patients less than 3 years of age and pregnant women has raised doubts in relation to the attitude that professionals implicated in these procedures should adopt in relation to these specific group of patients. Confronted with this situation, the following medical scientific societies: Sociedad Española de Anestesia y Reanimación (SEDAR), Sociedad Española de Cirugía Pediátrica (SECP), Sociedad Española de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (SECIP) y Sociedad Española de Neonatología (SENeo), have established a working group to analyze and clarify the safety of these techniques. In the present article we conclude that at present both general anesthesia and profound sedation are considered safe procedures because there is no evidence of the opposite in studies with human beings. However, this ascertained safety should not obviate the problem which still needs to be followed with attention, especially in patients less than 3 years of age undergoing anesthetic procedures for more than 3 hours or prolonged sedation in the Neonatal or Pediatric Intensive Care Units (AU)

[More than 3 hours and less than 3 years: Safety of anaesthetic procedures in infants less than 3 years old subected to surgery for more the 3 hours]. / Más de 3 horas y menos de 3 años: Seguridad de procedimientos anestésicos en menores de 3 años sometidos a cirugía de más de 3 horas.

An FDA alert in December 2016 on the safety of general anesthesia and sedations in patients less than 3 years of age and pregnant women has raised doubts in relation to the attitude that professionals implicated in these procedures should adopt in relation to these specific group of patients. Confronted with this situation, the following medical scientific societies: Sociedad Española de Anestesia y Reanimación (SEDAR), Sociedad Española de Cirugía Pediátrica (SECP), Sociedad Española de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (SECIP) y Sociedad Española de Neonatología (SENeo), have established a working group to analyze and clarify the safety of these techniques. In the present article we conclude that at present both general anesthesia and profound sedation are considered safe procedures because there is no evidence of the opposite in studies with human beings. However, this ascertained safety should not obviate the problem which still needs to be followed with attention, especially in patients less than 3 years of age undergoing anesthetic procedures for more than 3 hours or prolonged sedation in the Neonatal or Pediatric Intensive Care Units.

Actitudes éticas de los pediatras de Cuidados Intensivos ante pacientes con atrofia muscular espinal tipo 1 / Ethical attitudes of intensive care paediatricians as regards patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1

INTRODUCCIÓN: La atrofia muscular espinal tipo 1 (AME-1) es una enfermedad progresiva e incurable que plantea problemas éticos entre los profesionales de Pediatría. Nuestro objetivo ha sido conocer las opciones éticas de los pediatras de UCIP ante los pacientes con AME-1 y fracaso respiratorio. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo transversal, mediante una encuesta anónima enviada a las UCIP de España y accesible en la web de la Sociedad Española de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos. RESULTADOS: Analizamos 124 respuestas (70% mujeres, 51% menores de 40 años, 54% de UCIP con más de 10 camas, 69% con experiencia previa con estos niños y 53% con creencias religiosas). En el último caso atendido, la mayoría de los pediatras optó por la ventilación no invasiva (VNI), realizando después limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico (LET). Ante un hipotético caso futuro, la mitad de los pediatras apoyarían la misma opción (VNI+LET) y el 74% apoyaría la decisión de la familia, aunque no coincidiera con la suya. No se observaron diferencias según la edad, la experiencia previa o el sexo. Los pediatras con creencias religiosas son menos partidarios de la LET inicial. El 63% considera que la calidad de vida de un niño con AME-1 y ventilación invasiva es muy mala. CONCLUSIONES: Ante un niño con AME-1 y fracaso respiratorio, la mayoría de los pediatras de UCIP están a favor de iniciar la VNI y realizar LET cuando dicho soporte no sea suficiente, pero apoyarían la decisión de la familia aunque no estuvieran de acuerdo con ella

INTRODUCTION: Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA-1) is a progressive and fatal disease that leads to ethical problems for Paediatric professionals. Our objective was to determine the ethical options of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) paediatricians as regards a child with SMA-1 and respiratory failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using an anonymous questionnaire sent to PICUs in Spain (which can be accessed through the Spanish Society of Paediatric Critical Care web page). RESULTS: Of the 124 responses analysed, 70% were from women, 51% younger than 40 years, 54% from a PICU with more than 10 beds, 69% with prior experience in such cases, and 53% with religious beliefs. In the last patient cared for, most paediatricians opted for non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) and limitation of therapeutic effort (LET) in case of NIV failure. Confronted with a future hypothetical case, half of paediatricians would opt for the same plan (NIV+LET), and 74% would support the family's decision, even in case of disagreement. Age, prior experience and sex were not related to the preferred options. Paediatricians with religious beliefs were less in favour of initial LET. Less than two-thirds (63%) scored the quality of life of a child with SMA-1 and invasive mechanical ventilation as very poor. CONCLUSIONS: Faced with child with SMA-1 and respiratory failure, most paediatricians are in favour of initiating NIV and LET when such support is insufficient, but they would accept the family's decision, even in case of disagreement

[Ethical attitudes of intensive care paediatricians as regards patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1]. / Actitudes éticas de los pediatras de Cuidados Intensivos ante pacientes con atrofia muscular espinal tipo 1.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA-1) is a progressive and fatal disease that leads to ethical problems for Paediatric professionals. Our objective was to determine the ethical options of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) paediatricians as regards a child with SMA-1 and respiratory failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using an anonymous questionnaire sent to PICUs in Spain (which can be accessed through the Spanish Society of Paediatric Critical Care web page). RESULTS: Of the 124 responses analysed, 70% were from women, 51% younger than 40 years, 54% from a PICU with more than 10 beds, 69% with prior experience in such cases, and 53% with religious beliefs. In the last patient cared for, most paediatricians opted for non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) and limitation of therapeutic effort (LET) in case of NIV failure. Confronted with a future hypothetical case, half of paediatricians would opt for the same plan (NIV+LET), and 74% would support the family's decision, even in case of disagreement. Age, prior experience and sex were not related to the preferred options. Paediatricians with religious beliefs were less in favour of initial LET. Less than two-thirds (63%) scored the quality of life of a child with SMA-1 and invasive mechanical ventilation as very poor. CONCLUSIONS: Faced with child with SMA-1 and respiratory failure, most paediatricians are in favour of initiating NIV and LET when such support is insufficient, but they would accept the family's decision, even in case of disagreement.

Suport vital bàsic i avançat pediàtric 2015 / No disponible

No disponible

Transició de les recomanacions en RCP pediàtrica i neonatal entre 2005 i 2015: guies 2010 / No disponible

No disponible

Association of Polymorphisms in IRAK1, IRAK4 and MyD88, and Severe Invasive Pneumococcal Disease.

BACKGROUND: Severe invasive pneumococcal disease (SIPD) has high morbidity and mortality, conditioned by pneumococcus and host factors, such as Toll-like receptors and their Toll-IL1R common signaling pathway. The objectives of this study are (1) to correlate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) involved in some Toll-IL1R signaling pathway proteins (IRAK1, IRAK4, IRAKM and MyD88) with SIPD by comparing patients versus healthy controls. (2) To determine whether these SNPs influence SIPD outcome. METHODS: Case-control prospective observational study: 60 pediatric patients with IPD and systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and 120 healthy volunteers. Well-known immunodeficiencies were excluded. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: SNPs genotypes and alleles. Other variables: demographic, previous infections, and clinical, analytical and microbiological evolution data. RESULTS: We have detected significant disequilibrium of SNPs frequencies between SIPD patients and controls in rs1059701-CC (IRAK1; P = 0.0067), rs4251513-CC (IRAK4; P < 0.0001), rs1461567-T (IRAK4; P = 0.0158) and rs6853-AA (MyD88; P < 0.0001). SIPD patients showed significant association between: leukocytosis > 15,000/mmc and rs1059702-nonTT (IRAK1; P = 0.0460), pleuropneumonia and rs1624395-G (IRAKM; P = 0.0147), and rs1370128-C (IRAKM; P = 0.0055), sequelae, and rs4251513-nonGG (IRAK4; P = 0.0055), death and rs6853-nonAA (P = 0.0054) and rs6853-G (P = 0.0065; MyD88). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show an association between SNPs in IRAK1, IRAK4 and MyD88, and the presence of SIPD. Our data showed that some SNPs may lead to a higher risk of developing SIPD while other are related with the outcome in SIPD patients. Following PIRO score (predisposition, insult, response, organ dysfunction), identifying SNPs predisposing to infectious diseases, such as SIPD might help stratify patients with severe infectious diseases and design specific treatments.

Is a nasopharyngeal tube effective as interface to provide bi-level noninvasive ventilation?

BACKGROUND: The nasopharyngeal tube (NT) is a potential interface for noninvasive ventilation (NIV) available in all health care centers. The aim of the study was to describe our experience in the use of the NT for bi-level NIV in infants and its effectiveness. METHODS: Prospective observational study from January 2007 to December 2010, including all patients ≤ 6 months old admitted to the pediatric ICU (PICU) and treated with NIV with two levels of pressure using the NT. Clinical data collected before starting NIV, and at 2, 8, 12 and 24 h, were analyzed following NIV initiation: first-line or initial NIV (i-NIV), elective postextubation NIV (e-NIV), and rescue postextubation NIV (r-NIV). The need for intubation was considered to be NIV failure. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one episodes of NIV were included in the study, with 65% of patients having bronchiolitis. e-NIV was most frequently used (48%) (i-NIV 44%, r-NIV 8%), and the failure rate, 27% in total, was highest in the i-NIV group (37%) (e-NIV 18%, r-NIV 25%). Case patients with successful outcomes had shorter PICU stays (8.5 vs. 13 d, P = .001) and hospital stays (17 vs. 23 d, P = .03) stays. The NT needed to be changed for another interface in only 5 case patients, few complications (4 of 151 patients) were observed, and mortality (2 of 151 patients) was unrelated to NIV. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the NT showed 73% effectiveness, with few complications. The effectiveness was higher in e-NIV than i-NIV.

Non-invasive ventilation in bronchiolitis: Analysis according to a chronologic classification.

OBJECTIVE: To study patients diagnosed with bronchiolitis receiving ventilatory support with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) according to a chronologic classification: initial support (i-NIV), rescue post-extubation (r-NIV) and elective post-extubation (e-NIV); and to identify predictive factors of failure for each group. Prospective observational study (January 2004-December 2009), including all the patients with bronchiolitis admitted to pediatric intensive care unit and receiving ventilatory support with NIV. Clinical data collected at 0 (pre-NIV), 1, 2, 8, 12, 24 h of treatment were analyzed. Need for intubation was considered as NIV failure. NIV was successful in 65.8% of 152 cases included. Success rates were as follows: i-NIV (52.2%); r-NIV (72.2%); and e-NIV (90.9%) (Anova P < 0.000). Bi-level modes had higher efficacy (73%) than continuous positive airway pressure (61.5%) (Fisher's-test P = 0.049). Predictive factors of success in i-NIV group were inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) at 2 h, P = 0.003, higher pulse oximeter saturation (SpO2)/FiO2 values at 2 h (P = 0.009), and SpO2/FiO2 - 12 h (P = 0.05), lower heart rate (HR) at 12 h (P = 0.01), lower partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) previous to NIV (P = 0.009) and HR decrease-12 h (P = 0.008), In e-NIV: respiratory rate (RR)-1 h (P = 0.02), RR decrease-1 h (P = 0.006) and higher SpO2/FiO2 - 24 h (P = 0.01); in r-NIV: SpO2/FiO2 - 12 h (P = 0.04), lower HR-2 h (P = 0.03) and HR-8 h (P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified the groups as an independent variable (P = 0.04) but didn't show any significant value in any of the analyzed groups. Separate evaluation is advisable for i-NIV, r-NIV and e-NIV.